Skip to Content
0 Votes

Wiki source code of Studies: Conditioning

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:19
Show last authors
1 {{expandable summary="Study: 2018 European YWCA Study Session Report"}}
2 **Source:** *European YWCA Study Session*
3 **Date of Publication:** *2018*
4 **Author(s):** *European YWCA*
5 **Title:** *"2018 European YWCA Study Session Report"*
6 **DOI:** *Not applicable – Activist training report*
7 **Subject Matter:** *Migration Advocacy, DEI Conditioning, Youth Indoctrination*
8
9 {{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
10 1. **General Observations:**
11 - The report is a **youth-focused activist training session** summary, not an empirical study.
12 - Participants were primarily **young women from across Europe**, explicitly tasked with integrating migrant women into national YWCA structures.
13
14 2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
15 - The program promoted **sexual and reproductive health rights, “safe spaces” for migrant women, and structural diversity in YWCA leadership.**
16 - Targeted **young White European women for re-education** to challenge their “unconscious bias.”
17
18 3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
19 - Integration efforts deliberately emphasized **non-assimilationist policies**, focusing instead on embracing cultural pluralism.
20 - Recommended active collaboration with **NGOs supporting mass migration and refugee resettlement.**
21 {{/expandable}}
22
23 {{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
24 1. **Primary Observations:**
25 - Frames migration as an **unquestionable social good** and frames resistance as driven by ignorance or bias.
26 - Prioritizes **migrant women’s access to leadership positions** within YWCA and affiliated institutions.
27
28 2. **Subgroup Trends:**
29 - Migrant women’s empowerment is framed as requiring **re-education of host societies**, not just support for migrants.
30 - Explicitly encourages **faith-based organizations to become vehicles for DEI activism.**
31
32 3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
33 - Action plans included setting up “safe spaces” within local YWCAs **specifically for migrants**, even when those spaces excluded native participants.
34 - Proposed restructuring local YWCAs to **disrupt existing leadership hierarchies** in favor of “inclusive” criteria.
35 {{/expandable}}
36
37 {{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
38 1. **Strengths of the Study:**
39 - Reveals the depth of **institutional capture within European women’s networks**.
40 - Offers direct documentation of **grassroots DEI activism strategies.**
41
42 2. **Limitations of the Study:**
43 - Lacks any critical evaluation of **assimilation, cultural preservation, or local community consent.**
44 - Entirely one-sided — assumes all pro-migrant policies are neutral or positive by default.
45 - Fails to analyze the social fragmentation and demographic tensions that may arise.
46
47 3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
48 - Include assessments of **host community impact** and social cohesion costs.
49 - Evaluate whether **forced leadership diversity quotas** harm institutional integrity.
50 - Allow for perspectives that question whether **all cultural practices should be uncritically embraced.**
51 {{/expandable}}
52
53 {{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
54 - Illustrates how **pro-migration DEI narratives are embedded in faith-based and youth networks** across Europe.
55 - Provides evidence that **young White women are actively targeted for re-education** in these initiatives.
56 - Highlights the use of **grassroots organizations as vehicles for demographic and cultural transformation.**
57 {{/expandable}}
58
59 {{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
60 1. Study how YWCA and similar organizations are **funded by pro-migration NGOs and EU grants.**
61 2. Examine **long-term leadership shifts** in YWCA networks post-DEI integration.
62 3. Investigate whether **faith-based youth networks in Europe have resisted or embraced DEI pressures.** 
63 {{/expandable}}
64
65 {{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
66 [[Download Full Study>>attach:2018_European YWCA Study Session Report.pdf]]
67 {{/expandable}}
68 {{/expandable}}
69
70 {{expandable summary="Study: Who Marries Whom? The Role of Segregation by Race and Class"}}
71 **Source:** *U.S. Census Bureau Working Paper*
72 **Date of Publication:** *June 2024*
73 **Author(s):** *Benjamin Goldman, Jamie Gracie, Sonya R. Porter*
74 **Title:** *"Who Marries Whom? The Role of Segregation by Race and Class"*
75 **DOI:** [Link to Source](https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/series/ces-wp.html)
76 **Subject Matter:** *Marriage, Race, Class, Residential Segregation, Intergenerational Mobility*
77
78 {{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
79 1. **General Observations:**
80 - Only 0.5% of White individuals married a Black spouse.
81 - Only 3.1% of people from high-income families married someone from a low-income family.
82 - 68% of married couples lived within 50 census tracts of each other five years before marriage.
83
84 2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
85 - 19% of individuals from high-income families married someone from a similar high-income background.
86 - Among Black individuals, only 2.1% had a White spouse by age 30.
87
88 3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
89 - The marriage probability drops steeply with geographic distance.
90 - Residential segregation substantially impacts interclass marriage but has minimal impact on interracial marriage.
91 {{/expandable}}
92
93 {{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
94 1. **Primary Observations:**
95 - Interclass marriage is significantly influenced by exposure in residential neighborhoods.
96 - Interracial marriage shows minimal sensitivity to changes in residential exposure.
97
98 2. **Subgroup Trends:**
99 - Small increases in racial integration produce measurable but limited increases in interracial marriages.
100 - Residential moves that desegregate neighborhoods show significant effects on interclass marriage rates but almost no effect on interracial marriage rates.
101
102 3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
103 - Eliminating distance barriers entirely would increase interclass marriage rates by 41% but would only increase interracial marriage rates by about 6%.
104 - The Gautreaux Project, a real-world desegregation initiative, showed similar limited impacts on interracial marriage rates.
105 {{/expandable}}
106
107 {{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
108 1. **Strengths of the Study:**
109 - Robust use of U.S. Census and tax data covering a massive sample size.
110 - Methodologically strong with a spatial model capturing general equilibrium impacts.
111 - Careful attention to isolating causality using sex ratio variations.
112
113 2. **Limitations of the Study:**
114 - Focuses exclusively on White-Black marriage, largely ignoring other racial pairings.
115 - Does not fully explore cultural, ideological, or media-driven factors that may independently influence marriage patterns beyond exposure.
116 - Relies on tax data, which may underreport non-marital unions and cohabitation.
117
118 3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
119 - Broaden the racial analysis beyond just White and Black categories.
120 - Investigate the impact of media saturation and social programming aimed at increasing interracial marriage rates, particularly those that target White women.
121 - Examine the ideological pressure placed on White populations to pursue or normalize interracial relationships as a "progressive" social duty.
122 {{/expandable}}
123
124 {{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
125 - This study provides direct empirical evidence that **physical desegregation alone does little to change entrenched racial marriage patterns.**
126 - The persistent racial homophily in marriage directly contradicts the **mainstream narrative pushed by modern media and DEI campaigns that social exposure will naturally lead to increased racial mixing.**
127 - From a pro-White perspective, the study undermines the ideological push to engineer higher interracial mixing rates through forced proximity, media conditioning, and cultural normalization.
128 - The finding suggests that **deep-seated in-group preferences persist despite decades of aggressive integrationist policy and media efforts**—an important counterpoint to the anti-White agenda frequently present in modern advertising and political rhetoric.
129 {{/expandable}}
130
131 {{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
132 1. Investigate whether **media-driven promotions of interracial relationships, particularly Black male/White female pairings, have measurable impacts on real-world marriage rates.**
133 2. Analyze **other marriage patterns (e.g., Hispanic-White, Asian-White)** to see if similar exposure resistance holds across other racial groups or if specific groups are more affected by cultural programming.
134 3. Explore whether **institutional pressure and educational framing contribute to racial self-selection behaviors, particularly within White populations.**
135 {{/expandable}}
136
137 {{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
138 [[Download Full Study>>attach:Main Categories.Race.White Genocide.WebHome@Who_marries_whom.pdf]]
139 {{/expandable}}
140 {{/expandable}}
141
142 {{expandable summary="Study: The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography"}}
143 **Source:** *Center for Immigration Studies*
144 **Date of Publication:** *October 2001*
145 **Author(s):** *Stephen Steinlight*
146 **Title:** *"The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography: Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy"*
147 **DOI:** Unavailable
148 **Subject Matter:** *Immigration, Demographics, Jewish Political Interests, Assimilation*
149
150 {{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
151 1. **General Observations:**
152 - By the 2000 census, Mexican immigration had surged from fewer than 800,000 in 1970 to nearly 9 million.
153 - Muslims in the U.S. estimated between 2.5 to 6 million, with political activity rapidly increasing.
154 - The Hispanic/Caribbean share of 1990s U.S. immigration was approximately 55%.
155
156 2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
157 - The Jewish community was described as maintaining high political influence despite declining fertility and increasing intermarriage.
158 - Jewish organizations often supported large-scale immigration publicly, despite internal unease.
159
160 3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
161 - The author predicts a long-term decline in Jewish political power due to rising Latino and Muslim demographics.
162 - Jewish organizations were heavily involved in coalitions promoting immigration, even when the grassroots Jewish population was increasingly skeptical.
163 {{/expandable}}
164
165 {{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
166 1. **Primary Observations:**
167 - Unchecked mass immigration is presented as a potential long-term threat to Jewish political influence and cultural security in America.
168 - Jewish leadership was criticized for ignoring the potential consequences of demographic shifts.
169
170 2. **Subgroup Trends:**
171 - Jewish grassroots sentiment was already diverging from leadership’s pro-immigration advocacy.
172 - The rise of Islamism was explicitly identified as a security threat to Jewish interests.
173
174 3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
175 - Jewish leadership was described as supporting open immigration out of historical habit, guilt over U.S. policies in the 1920s, and fear of returning nativist sentiment.
176 - Latino immigration, specifically Mexican, was seen as politically transformative with limited alignment to Jewish interests.
177 {{/expandable}}
178
179 {{expandable summary="📝 Racial Bias Examination"}}
180 1. **Pro-White Observations:**
181 - The author’s concerns inadvertently validate pro-White critiques: mass immigration reshapes demographics to the detriment of the existing ethnic majority.
182 - The explicit Jewish focus on maintaining group power while simultaneously promoting diversity for the host society reveals an asymmetrical racial strategy.
183
184 2. **Pro-White Concerns:**
185 - The double standard: Jewish organizations openly pursue ethnic self-preservation while promoting policies that erode the ethnic self-preservation of Whites.
186 - The selective concern over Muslim immigration, while continuing to advocate for diversity elsewhere, suggests a targeted rather than universally principled opposition to demographic change.
187
188 3. **Potential Racial Bias:**
189 - Jewish anxieties over declining group influence mirror the exact same concerns often labeled “racist” when voiced by Whites.
190 - The study demonstrates that when other groups face demographic decline, it is framed as a problem to be mitigated, but when Whites face decline, it is often framed as desirable progress.
191 {{/expandable}}
192
193 {{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
194 - This study is critical for understanding the **ethnic double standards in demographic politics.**
195 - It reveals that **ethnic self-interest is normalized for some groups but pathologized for Whites.**
196 - The Jewish community’s historical support for immigration is not universalist—it is self-protective, with limits when their group power is threatened.
197 - The study directly supports critiques of modern immigration policy as a **targeted demographic strategy** rather than a purely humanitarian movement.
198 {{/expandable}}
199
200 {{expandable summary="🔍 Other Wiki Pages That Should Reference This Study"}}
201 1. [[The Great Replacement>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/White%20Decline/The%20Great%20Replacement/]]
202 2. [[Immigration>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Immigration%20and%20Politics/Immigration/]]
203 3. [[Racial Demographics>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Race/Racial%20Demographics/]]
204 4. [[Media Bias>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Media%2C%20Propaganda%2C%20and%20Conditioning/Media%20Bias/]]
205 5. [[Discrimination Against White People>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Discrimination/Discrimination%20Against%20White%20People/]]
206 6. [[Jewish Power and Influence>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Jews/Jewish%20Power%20and%20Influence/]]
207 7. [[Intermarriage and Ethnic Exclusivity>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Jews/Intermarriage%20and%20Ethnic%20Exclusivity/]]
208 8. [[Jewish Influence on Foreign Affairs>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Jews/Jewish%20Influence%20on%20Foreign%20Affairs/]]
209 9. [[Miscegenation>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Dating%20%26%20Social%20Media/Miscegenation/]]
210 10. [[Ethnic Double Standards in Demographic Policy>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Ethnic%20Double%20Standards%20in%20Demographic%20Policy/]] (Suggested New Page)
211 {{/expandable}}
212
213 {{expandable summary="📄Download Full Study"}}
214 [[Download Full Study>>attach:Main Categories.Race.White Genocide.WebHome@Steinlight - The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography.pdf]]
215 {{/expandable}}
216 {{/expandable}}

XWiki AI Chat