Mainstream Explanation  

The narrative that is maintained throughout the education system and media today is largely that there is no difference at all in IQ between groups. This section will be prefaced with a few facts about what is objectively true.  

There is an IQ gap between racial groups.[^1]  

[^1]: [Brookings Institution](https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-black-white-test-score-gap-why-it-persists-and-what-can-be-done/) - Discusses the Black-White test score gap and factors contributing to it.  

# There is not a country on earth where there has been IQ testing done which shows no gap.

 Key Points of the Mainstream View  

1. IQ Tests Measure Cognitive Ability, Not Innate Intelligence  
      - IQ tests measure problem-solving skills and cognitive abilities shaped by environmental factors rather than fixed, innate intelligence.  

2. Environmental Factors Are the Primary Cause of IQ Differences  
   - Differences in average IQ scores between racial groups are explained by disparities in education, income, healthcare, and exposure to enriching experiences.  

3. Race Is a Social Construct  
   - The concept of race is viewed by many scholars as a social construct with limited biological basis, which complicates any attempt to correlate intelligence with race.  

4. The Flynn Effect  
   - The steady rise in IQ scores across all populations over time (the Flynn Effect) suggests that intelligence is highly malleable and influenced by societal improvements.  

-

 Mainstream Supporting Evidence  

-

 Open Discussion: Alternative Hypotheses  

This section is for users to add evidence or arguments that challenge the mainstream narrative.  

# Genetic Hypothesis  
The genetic hypothesis suggests that some of the observed IQ differences between racial groups may have a genetic basis. Proponents argue that:  
- There are population-level genetic differences that could influence cognitive traits.  
- Environmental factors alone cannot fully account for all disparities.  

# Evidence Supporting the Genetic Hypothesis  

-

 Challenges to the Mainstream View  

Users can list logical flaws or counterpoints to the mainstream explanation.  

-

 Unresolved Questions  

This section invites users to add questions or areas where more research is needed.  

1. How do persistent IQ differences remain across different environments?  
   2. Are there cultural biases inherent in IQ tests that disadvantage certain groups?  
   3. To what extent do genetics contribute to cognitive differences between populations?  

-

 Conclusion  

The relationship between race and IQ is a complex and sensitive topic. The mainstream consensus emphasizes the role of environmental factors in shaping intelligence, while alternative hypotheses highlight the potential influence of genetic differences. Users are encouraged to critically assess the evidence, contribute data, and engage in constructive dialogue to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the issue.  

-

 Contribute Evidence  

Users are encouraged to:  
- Add peer-reviewed studies or historical data.  
- Challenge mainstream explanations with well-supported counterpoints.  
- Engage in respectful debate while adhering to the platform's guidelines.  

[Add Your Evidence Here]  

-

[sjp.2016.88.pdf](/pdfs/peer-reviewed/sjp.2016.88.pdf)  

  
The [toc] macro is a standalone macro and it cannot be used inline. Click on this message for details.
This macro generates standalone content. As a consequence you need to make sure to use a syntax that separates your macro from the content before and after it so that it's on a line by itself. For example in XWiki Syntax 2.0+ this means having 2 newline characters (a.k.a line breaks) separating your macro from the content before and after it.    

  
Figure 1: Sea  

  
Figure 2: Waves