Immigration - XWiki

= Immigration in the United States =

Immigration has played a central role in shaping American demographics, politics, and identity. While the U.S. was founded and populated predominantly by Europeans, successive waves of immigration—both authorized and unauthorized—have transformed the nation's ethnic, cultural, and fiscal landscape.

4

5

== Early Immigration Policy and Restrictions ==

6

7

=== 1790 Naturalization Act ===

8

The first federal law on naturalization limited U.S. citizenship to "**free White persons of good character**." This defined the racial boundaries of American citizenship at the time, explicitly excluding non-Whites and women from naturalization rights.

9

10

=== 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act ===

11

This act was the **first major federal law** to restrict immigration based on ethnicity. It banned all immigration of Chinese laborers for 10 years and laid the foundation for future exclusionary policies.

12

13

=== 1924 Johnson-Reed Act ===

14

Established a **quota system** that restricted immigration by national origin. Designed to maintain the "historic demographic composition" of the United States, it heavily favored Northern and Western Europeans and barred Asian immigrants entirely.

15

16

=== 1965 Hart-Celler Act ===

17

This landmark legislation **abolished national origin quotas** and shifted immigration priorities to **family reunification and skilled labor**. While intended to be moderate, it radically changed the **ethnic makeup** of U.S. immigration, leading to a surge from Asia, Latin America, and Africa.

18

19

== Projected Demographic Impact ==

20

21

Recent projections by Camarota & Zeigler (2022) reveal that **immigration is responsible for nearly 90% of future U.S. population growth**, with long-term consequences for infrastructure, schools, and entitlement programs.

22

23

(% id="usPopulationProjection" %)

24

|=Year|=With Immigration|=Without Immigration|

|2020|331|331|

|2030|349|334|

|2040|368|336|

|2050|386|336|

|2060|404|336|

{{chart source="xdom" type="bar3D"

32

params="table:usPopulationProjection;range:B2-C6;series:columns;

33

legendVisible:true;

34

plotBorderVisible:false;

35

backgroundColor:FFFFFF;

36

plotBackgroundColor:F9F9F9;

37

borderColor:FFFFFF;

38

colors=4E79A7,F28E2B"

39

title="Projected U.S. Population with vs. without Immigration"

40

width="700" height="350"}}

41

42

43

== Fiscal, Political, and Social Consequences ==

44

45

Immigration is no longer just a cultural phenomenon. As shown by multiple empirical studies, it carries **measurable fiscal burdens**, reshapes **voting patterns**, and introduces new demands on state institutions.

46

47

{{expandable summary="Study: Projecting the Impact of Immigration on the U.S. Population"}}

48

**Source:** *Center for Immigration Studies*

49

**Date of Publication:** *2022*

50

**Author(s):** *Steven Camarota and Karen Zeigler*

51

**Title:** *"Projecting the Impact of Immigration on the U.S. Population"*

52

**DOI:** N/A

53

**Subject Matter:** *Demographics, immigration policy, long-term growth*

54

55

56

1. **Total U.S. Population in 2060:**

57

- With immigration: **404 million**

58

- Without immigration: **336 million**

59

2. **Share of Growth from Immigration (2020–2060):** **89%**

60

3. **Projected Immigrant-Origin Share of U.S. Population (2060):** Over **30%**

1. **Demographic Surge:**

65

Immigration accounts for nearly all growth beyond 2030, driven by both new arrivals and their U.S.-born descendants.

66

67

2. **Educational and Economic Strain:**

68

Most post-1965 immigrants arrive with below-average education, increasing demand on public schools and healthcare.

69

70

3. **Displacement and Fiscal Pressure:**

71

Native employment sectors face downward wage pressure; fiscal impact is negative or neutral for most groups.

72

73

4. **Voting Trends:**

74

Immigration shifts the electorate leftward; this is especially pronounced in formerly competitive states like Nevada and Georgia.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

79

- Long-range population modeling

80

- Includes second-generation effects

81

- Clear quantitative comparisons with/without immigration

82

83

2. **Limitations:**

84

- No fiscal breakdown by ethnicity

85

- Lacks cultural or cohesion metrics

86

87

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

88

- Track assimilation outcomes

89

- Project infrastructure demand

90

- Compare impact by immigrant cohort

- Supports claims about demographic transformation post-1965

95

- Shows immigration as the primary driver of future U.S. population growth

96

- Validates concerns about long-term fiscal sustainability

1. Recreate model using state-level projections

101

2. Include fertility and intermarriage adjustments

102

3. Compare to EU or Canadian trends

[[Download Full Study>>attach:Camarota and Zeigler - Projecting the Impact of Immigration on the U.S. Population.pdf]]

== Related Topics ==

* [[The Great Replacement Theory>>GreatReplacementTheory.WebHome]]

112

* [[Demographic Engineering in Europe>>Europe.DemographicEngineering]]

113

* [[Race and Citizenship>>Race.Citizenship]]

114

115

== Footnotes ==

116

{{footnote}}Camarota, Steven A., and Karen Zeigler. *Projecting the Impact of Immigration on the U.S. Population*, Center for Immigration Studies (2022). Available at: [[https://cis.org/Report/Projecting-Impact-Immigration-US-Population]]{{/footnote}}

117

118

{{footnote}}Naturalization Act of 1790, 1st Cong., 2nd Sess., Ch. 3, 1 Stat. 103{{/footnote}}

119

120

{{footnote}}Hart-Celler Act, Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments of 1965, Pub.L. 89–236{{/footnote}}

= Immigration and the Fiscal Burden on the Dutch Welfare State =

125

126

The 2023 report //Borderless Welfare State// presents a comprehensive analysis of immigration's impact on Dutch public finances. Between 1995 and 2019, immigration—including the second generation—incurred a net fiscal cost of approximately €400 billion. Projections indicate that, if current patterns continue, this figure could exceed €1 trillion by 2040.

127

128

This cost arises from increased per capita spending on education, healthcare, social security, and justice services for immigrants, combined with lower average tax contributions. In 2016 alone, the net fiscal cost of immigration peaked at €32 billion.

129

130

{{expandable summary="Study: Borderless Welfare State – The Fiscal Impact of Immigration in the Netherlands"}}

131

**Source:** *Demo-Demo Publisher (Netherlands)*

132

**Date of Publication:** *2023*

133

**Author(s):** *Jan van de Beek, Hans Roodenburg, Joop Hartog, Gerrit Kreffer*

134

**Title:** *"Borderless Welfare State: Immigration and the Sustainability of Dutch Public Finances"*

135

**DOI:** N/A

136

**Subject Matter:** *Immigration policy, fiscal sustainability, welfare state, demographic projections*

137

138

139

1. **Total Net Cost (1995–2019):** €400 billion

140

2. **Projected Cost by 2040:** Exceeds €1 trillion if trends continue

141

3. **Annual Fiscal Cost in 2016:** €32 billion

142

4. **Second Generation Still Net Negative:** Despite education improvements

143

5. **Cito Score Correlation:** +€20,000 per 1-point increase

1. **By Immigration Motive:**

148

149

Only labour migration yields positive fiscal returns. Other categories—study, family, asylum—are net burdens.

150

151

(% id="immigrationMotive" %)

152

153

|Estimate A|125000|-75000|-275000|-475000|

154

|Estimate B|125000|-75000|-275000|-475000|

155

156

{{chart source="xdom" type="bar3D" params="table:immigrationMotive;range:B2-E3;series:columns;

157

legendVisible:true;

158

plotBorderVisible:false;

159

backgroundColor:FFFFFF;

160

plotBackgroundColor:F9F9F9;

161

borderColor:FFFFFF;

162

colors=4E79A7,F28E2B,E15759,76B7B2" title="Fiscal Impact by Immigration Motive (3D View)" width="800" height="360"}}{{/chart}}

163

164

2. **By Region of Origin:**

165

166

Western migrants contribute marginally, while those from Islamic and African regions are highly negative. Japan/NA/Oceania immigrants are highly positive.

167

168

(% id="immigrationRegion" %)

169

170

|Estimate A|25000|-275000|200000|-550000|-600000|

171

|Estimate B|25000|-275000|200000|-550000|-600000|

172

173

{{chart source="xdom" type="bar3D" params="table:immigrationRegion;range:B2-F3;series:columns;

174