0 Votes

Immigration

Version 19.1 by Ryan C on 2025/06/21 11:41

Immigration and the Fiscal Burden on the Dutch Welfare State

The 2023 report Borderless Welfare State presents a comprehensive analysis of immigration's impact on Dutch public finances. Between 1995 and 2019, immigration—including the second generation—incurred a net fiscal cost of approximately €400 billion. Projections indicate that, if current patterns continue, this figure could exceed €1 trillion by 2040.

This cost arises from increased per capita spending on education, healthcare, social security, and justice services for immigrants, combined with lower average tax contributions. In 2016 alone, the net fiscal cost of immigration peaked at €32 billion.

Study: Borderless Welfare State – The Fiscal Impact of Immigration in the Netherlands

Source: *Demo-Demo Publisher (Netherlands)*  
Date of Publication: *2023*  
Author(s): *Jan van de Beek, Hans Roodenburg, Joop Hartog, Gerrit Kreffer*  
Title: *"Borderless Welfare State: Immigration and the Sustainability of Dutch Public Finances"*  
DOI: N/A  
Subject Matter: *Immigration policy, fiscal sustainability, welfare state, demographic projections*

📊 Key Statistics
  1. Total Net Cost (1995–2019): €400 billion  
    2. Projected Cost by 2040: Exceeds €1 trillion if trends continue  
    3. Annual Fiscal Cost in 2016: €32 billion  
    4. Second Generation Still Net Negative: Despite education improvements  
    5. Cito Score Correlation: +€20,000 per 1-point increase  
🔬 Findings
  1. By Immigration Motive:

Only labour migration yields positive fiscal returns. Other categories—study, family, asylum—are net burdens.

MotiveLabourStudyFamilyAsylum
Estimate A125000-75000-275000-475000
Estimate B125000-75000-275000-475000

Fiscal Impact by Immigration Motive (3D View)

2. By Region of Origin:

Western migrants contribute marginally, while those from Islamic and African regions are highly negative. Japan/NA/Oceania immigrants are highly positive.

RegionWestern (avg.)Non-Western (avg.)Japan/NA/OceaniaMoroccoHorn of Africa/Sudan
Estimate A25000-275000200000-550000-600000
Estimate B25000-275000200000-550000-600000

Fiscal Impact by Region of Origin (3D View)

3. Demographic Pressure:

Maintaining current dependency ratio would require a population of 100 million by 2100.

📝 Critique & Observations
  1. Strengths of the Study:
       - Includes second-generation effects
       - Clear cost modeling by motive & origin
       - Connects fiscal performance to educational scores

2. Limitations:
   - No cost breakdown by sector
   - Limited modeling of non-fiscal outcomes

3. Suggestions for Improvement:
   - Disaggregate scores by family structure
   - Add enforcement cost modeling
   - Compare against control group baselines

📌 Relevance to Subproject

- Demonstrates the structural fiscal unsustainability of mass immigration
- Highlights the value of selective, skilled migration with native integration
- Useful for countering myths about second-generation economic assimilation

🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration
  1. Compare these fiscal trends to France and Sweden  
    2. Estimate cultural cohesion loss alongside fiscal cost  
    3. Track welfare dependence by cohort length and generation