... |
... |
@@ -13,13 +13,15 @@ |
13 |
13 |
Only labour migration contributes positively to public finances. All other immigration categories—study, family, and especially asylum—result in significant long-term fiscal burdens per person. |
14 |
14 |
|
15 |
15 |
|
16 |
|
-{{chart type="bar" source="inline" params="series:columns;" width="800" height="350"}} |
17 |
|
-|=Motive|=Labour|=Study|=Family|=Asylum| |
18 |
|
-|Net Contribution (€)|125000|-75000|-275000|-475000| |
|
16 |
+{{chart type="bar" source="inline" params="series:rows;" width="800" height="350"}} |
|
17 |
+|=Motive|=Net Contribution (€)| |
|
18 |
+|Labour|125000| |
|
19 |
+|Study|-75000| |
|
20 |
+|Family|-275000| |
|
21 |
+|Asylum|-475000| |
19 |
19 |
{{/chart}} |
20 |
20 |
|
21 |
21 |
|
22 |
|
- |
23 |
23 |
== Fiscal Impact by Region of Origin == |
24 |
24 |
|
25 |
25 |
Migrants from Western countries have a marginally positive average net contribution. By contrast, migrants from non-Western regions impose large costs on the treasury, particularly those from Morocco and the Horn of Africa. Labour migrants from Japan, North America, and Oceania are the most fiscally beneficial group. |