Skip to Content
0 Votes

Wiki source code of But White women are whores

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 05:24
Hide last authors
Ryan C 98.1 1 {{toc/}}
Ryan C 96.1 2
Ryan C 92.1 3 = The latest studies and statistics on interracial relationships =
Imabot fromtelegram 1.1 4
Ryan C 92.1 5 Focusing on:
6 - Online dating and hookups
7 - Marriage
8 - Cohabitation
9 - Birth data and trends
10 - Relationship outcomes
11 From 2014 to 2024
Imabot fromtelegram 1.1 12
Ryan C 99.2 13
Ryan C 99.3 14 [[ https:~~/~~/mashable.com/article/racism-online-dating>>image:GeEgU8MWcAAEOuh.jpg||width="350px"]]
Imabot fromtelegram 1.1 15
Ryan C 99.4 16 == ==
Ryan C 99.2 17
Ryan C 92.1 18 == The earliest data from OkCupid ==
Imabot fromtelegram 3.1 19
Ryan C 92.1 20 White women are the most racially exclusive.
21 Despite liberals outnumbering cons over 2 to 1, and their preference taboo.
22 Exclusivity increased in 2014, despite an altered matching algorithm.
23 Asian women desired Black men more than White women.
Ryan C 88.1 24
Ryan C 99.4 25 [[image:GeEhikVWQAAOdYf.png||width="350px"]]
Ryan C 90.1 26
Ryan C 99.4 27 [[~[~[https:~~~~/~~~~/www.researchgate.net/figure/Response-patterns-in-the-Facebook-dating-app-Are-You-Interested-1-The-numbers-represent_fig1_326561174~>~>https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Response-patterns-in-the-Facebook-dating-app-Are-You-Interested-1-The-numbers-represent_fig1_326561174~]~]>>image:GeEhje9WoAAabKy.png||width="350px"]]
28
Ryan C 99.3 29 {{footnote}}
30 https://www.psychologytoday.com/sg/blog/pop-psych/201401/what-does-online-dating-tell-us-about-racial-views)
31 {{/footnote}}
Ryan C 90.1 32
Ryan C 92.1 33 == OkCupid Matching Scores ==
Ryan C 88.1 34
Ryan C 92.1 35 'QuickMatch score' predicts compatibility based on profile information, rather than visual attraction.
36 'Let's Meet score' predicts the willingness to engage in real-world meeting based on visual attraction (rating).
37 [More info](http://shorturl.at/2zNvc)
Ryan C 88.1 38
Ryan C 92.1 39 [[image:GeEhkDXXwAApqKF.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEhkr4WIAAufIw.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEhrA8WwAAkrdD.jpg||width="350px"]]
Ryan C 91.1 40
Ryan C 92.1 41 == European Online Dating Study (2015) ==
Ryan C 87.2 42
Ryan C 92.1 43 Individuals uniformly prefer to date same-race partners, and there is a hierarchy of preferences among natives and minorities.
44 Non-Arabic minority daters have strong preferences for Europeans.
Ryan C 87.2 45
Ryan C 92.1 46 [[image:GeEhyWlXsAAn9Zd.png||width="300px"]] [[image:GeEhy53WIAAJON_.png||width="300px"]] [[image:GeEhzYlXAAAOZsc.png||width="300px"]]
Ryan C 87.2 47
Ryan C 92.1 48 == Crossracial Differences in Preferences (2016) ==
Ryan C 87.2 49
Ryan C 92.1 50 African-Americans are the least desired dating partners.
51 The percentage of European-Americans willing to date African-Americans is significantly lower than the percentage willing to date Hispanic and Asian-Americans.
Ryan C 87.2 52
Ryan C 92.1 53 [[image:GeEh5f_XkAATVCz.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEh6BIWkAAbeMZ.png||width="350px"]]
Ryan C 87.2 54
Ryan C 92.1 55 == Assortative Mating and Online Dating (2017, Germany) ==
Ryan C 87.2 56
Ryan C 92.1 57 Online dating reduces endogamy compared to other forms of meeting partners, but mainly educational and religious endogamy.
58 Racial endogamy is twice as prevalent as the former two.
Ryan C 87.2 59
Ryan C 92.1 60 [[image:GeEiBViWcAAO_h1.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEiCdyXAAAB3Bk.png||width="350px"]]
Ryan C 87.2 61
Ryan C 92.1 62 == Tinder Usage and Interracial Dating (2020, Netherlands) ==
Ryan C 87.2 63
Ryan C 92.1 64 Using 24 fake Tinder profiles featuring White and non-White people (minorities in the Netherlands: Turkish, Moroccan, etc).
65 12 White, 12 non-White.
66 All respondents found White-looking profiles more attractive.
Ryan C 87.2 67
Ryan C 92.1 68 [[image:GeEiZQAXAAAitYl.jpg||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEigtRWAAAmzee.png||width="350px"]]
Ryan C 87.2 69
Ryan C 92.1 70 Study limitations: Asking respondents to indicate ethnic similarity could have primed them to the purpose of the study, and led to increased social desirability in their answers.
71 Conclusion: All respondents ranked Caucasian-looking Tinder users as more attractive and dateable.
Ryan C 87.2 72
Ryan C 92.1 73 == Modeling Dating Decisions (2021) ==
Ryan C 87.2 74
Ryan C 92.1 75 "Attractiveness and race were nearly double the influence of other things...
76 While attractiveness played a major role in the participants' decisions to swipe left or right, race was a leading factor."
Ryan C 87.2 77
Ryan C 92.1 78 [[image:GeEingJWUAAhkg4.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEioFUXkAAA8dW.png||width="350px"]]
Ryan C 87.2 79
Ryan C 92.1 80 Conclusion:
81 "When the targets were Black, Asian, or Hispanic, they were less likely to be swiped right on. Among the largest effect sizes was a lower likelihood of swiping right if the target was Black.
82 Negative stereotypes may impact their [perceived] attractiveness."
Ryan C 87.2 83
Ryan C 92.1 84 [[image:GeEix-BWgAApy7S.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEiyiFXcAAUYG6.png||width="350px"]]
Ryan C 87.2 85
Ryan C 92.1 86 == Assortative Online Dating (2022, Netherlands) ==
Ryan C 87.2 87
Ryan C 92.1 88 Respondents with a Dutch ancestry were more likely to select a White person.
89 Both Dutch and non-Dutch ancestry preferred White targets.
90 Race was the most important factor in partner choice.
Ryan C 87.2 91
Ryan C 92.1 92 [[image:GeEi554WwAAO7bQ.jpg||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEi6a0XkAAOvGR.png||width="350px"]]
Ryan C 87.2 93
Ryan C 92.1 94 A dating app experiment with 500 young adults:
95 Visual cues to race determine selection, while related cultural signaling appears irrelevant.
Ryan C 87.2 96
Ryan C 92.1 97 [[image:GeEi_7qWIAA4P-h.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEjAaZWwAAmGAu.png||width="350px"]]
Ryan C 87.2 98
Ryan C 92.1 99 == Romance & Racism (2022) ==
Ryan C 87.2 100
Ryan C 92.1 101 White women particularly had strong same-race preferences.
102 Latinas liked White men over Black and Asian, but not Latinos.
103 Asian women preferred Asian over Black, but not White men.
104 Black women did not show a preference for any race.
Ryan C 87.2 105
Ryan C 92.1 106 [[image:GeEjHvkWIAA-L3h.png||width="300px"]] [[image:GeEjINRW4AAEnMq.png||width="300px"]] [[image:GeEjIuuXAAELMhS.png||width="300px"]]
Ryan C 87.2 107
Ryan C 92.1 108 White women and Latinas were more willing to date White men than Asian and Black men.
109 Asian and Black men were equally disliked.
110 Asian women preferred White and Asian men. (They were more willing to date Black men than White women were.)
111 Black women had no racial preference.
Ryan C 87.2 112
Ryan C 92.1 113 [[image:GeEjRC0XoAAhawH.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEjRm1XgAAfuwa.png||width="350px"]]
Ryan C 87.2 114
Ryan C 92.1 115 == Tinder and Russian Generation Z (2022) ==
Ryan C 87.2 116
Ryan C 92.1 117 Dateability is heavily influenced by racial preferences.
118 Almost everyone stated that they would never swipe right on someone of a different race.
Ryan C 87.2 119
Ryan C 92.1 120 [[image:GeEjdqXWMAAjI8u.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEjeUAWQAAptFT.png||width="350px"]]
Ryan C 87.2 121
Ryan C 92.1 122 Theorized cause: "Sexual racism" from Russian media.
123 Russian children don't see Black people growing up, so they absorb pictures of Blacks from Russian pop culture. This shows them with low social capital, thus zoomers hesitate.
Ryan C 87.2 124
Ryan C 92.1 125 [[image:GeEjmlVWcAATC56.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEjnf6WUAAw71T.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEjn-tXkAAJZDf.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEjoZeXoAAhaRk.jpg||width="250px"]]
Ryan C 87.2 126
Ryan C 92.1 127 == Racial Preferences in Dating Apps (2023, Aldana et al) ==
Ryan C 87.2 128
Ryan C 92.1 129 In a mock tinder app with 2,513 participants:
130 All of the female participants who initiated a conversation in the heterosexual condition with the Black male profile were trans women, according to their bios.
Ryan C 87.2 131
Ryan C 92.1 132 [[image:GeEjydPWgAAKbP-.jpg||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEjzCfWMAA66c0.jpg||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEjzi5WkAALq4c.jpg||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEj0BgXYAAsBef.jpg||width="250px"]]
133
134 Thousands of people saw these profiles.
135 White profiles had more likes in every situation.
136 Conclusion: Homogamous preferences, and rooted problems like sexual racism, can lead users to maintain a racialized sexual hierarchy that privileges Whiteness.
137
138 [[image:GeEkIE6W0AAi6qS.jpg||width="350px"]]
139
140 == Match's Singles in America (2023) ==
141
142 Gen Z Less Likely To Date Outside of Their Race Than Millennials.
143 While Gen Z might be known for their progressive politics, they might not be as progressive when it comes to dating compared with their Millenial elders.
144
145 [[image:GeEkfFQWIAAgOaK.jpg||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEkfnEXUAAajhI.jpg||width="350px"]]
146
147 == Annual Review of Sociology (2024) ==
148
149 It was speculated that Asian men face more discrimination from White women than Black men do.
150 Yet, Black and Asian men outmarry at similar rates.
151 White women discriminate against Black and Asian men equally.
152
153 [[image:GeEkrbsWkAEGDEd.png||width="350px"]]
154
155 Therefore, White men's marriage patterns with Black women are the anomaly, and must be due to anti-Black discrimination.
156 White men's anti-Black discrimination may be a more important explanation for observed intermarriage patterns.
157
158 [[image:GeEkyBdWQAAI1ux.png||width="350px"]]
159
160 == Racial Marriage Preferences and Online Dating (2024) ==
161
162 The rise of dating apps hasn't changed racial marriage preferences:
163 "Our results indicated strong racial preferences... The paper found minimal changes in these preferences over the 2008-21 period, in which online dating dominated marriage selection."
164
165 [[image:GeEk5WXXgAA4E6z.jpg||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEk528WQAAC1zc.png||width="350px"]]
166
167 Conclusion:
168 Our findings of minimal changes in preferences over the 2008-21 period is surprising. Given the proliferation of online dating...
169 Because people have increasingly been marrying someone more like themselves, that can account for the increase in household inequality.
170
171 [[image:GeEk9p-WgAAE_f6.png||width="350px"]]
172
173 = Marriage =
174
175 Among currently married women in their 1st marriage in 2016, 10 percent were in an interracial/interethnic marriage.
176 10.3% of women
177 5.1% of married non-Hispanic White women
178 8% of married Black women
179 20.6% of Asian women
180 22.4% of Hispanic or Latino (any race)
181
182 [[image:GeElhTVWUAAgkH8.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeElh5kWoAAfp4j.png||width="350px"]]
183
184 Why is the number (5.1%) so low here?
185 Research has shown that interracial couples have higher rates of divorce than other couples, so the percentage of currently married interracial couples shown in the table may be lower than the percentage of interracial couples who married.
186
187 [[image:GeEl0I4WYAAOtU5.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEl0u4XIAAw68r.png||width="350px"]]
188
189 What are the trends?
190 2000-2016, the total % of interracial married households increased from 7.4% to 10.2%.
191 Of this:
192 White/Hispanic: 35% to 40% respectively.
193 White/Asian: 12.5%-14.4%
194 White/Black couples: 7.1%-8.1%.
195 Note: this is % of IR households, not all households
196
197 [[image:GeEmHEXXkAEuRGK.jpg||width="350px"]]
198
199 == Black-White Intermarriage in a Global Perspective (2023) ==
200
201 For the first time, French data includes a proxy for race!
202 White females | White males:
203 Brazil: 5.4% / 4.1%
204 France: 2.0% / 1.4%
205 UK: 0.7% / 0.4%
206 USA: 2.0% / 0.6%
207 SA: 0.5% / 1.0%
208
209 [[image:GeEmn2hXsAA5TMv.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEmoQjWEAAe5dp.png||width="350px"]]
210
211 "We use the term intermarriage in a generic manner; in our study we examine both married and cohabiting couples.
212 A feature of black–white intermarriage in the US is an imbalanced sex ratio; such gender imbalances are not found in any other countries."
213 [Full study](https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol49/28/49-28.pdf)
214
215 [[image:GeEm27LWgAA3msM.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEm4F-XoAAiybb.png||width="350px"]]
216
217 == Marital Instability Among Interracial Couples ==
218
219 White wife/Black husband marriages show twice the divorce rate of White wife/White husband couples by the 10th year of marriage.
220 The highest divorce rate of any combo, including Black-Black marriages.
221
222 [[image:GeEpG5MWUAAPMBw.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEpbHcXYAEvFz6.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEpcyAXAAADxAL.jpg||width="250px"]]
223
224 From a later study "Marital Dissolution...":
225 Black husband-White wife marriages are 185% more likely to end in divorce.
226 White Husband-Black wife, 158%
227 Hispanic Husband-White wife, 133%
228 White Husband-Hispanic wife, 111%
229 Both gender combinations with Asians had lower divorce rates
230
231 [[image:GeEp8eSWQAAPIhS.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEp9BBXIAIMpmK.png||width="350px"]]
232
233 = Cohabitation =
234
235 8% of White adults cohabit, 57% are married.
236 Whites are the least likely to cohabit interracially, at 12%.
237 Of cohabiting households in 2007-2011, 2.7% were Black-White.
238 In 2017-2021, this share increased to 2.8%.
239 A 0.1% increase in the last decade.
240
241 [[image:GeEqJ0sXgAAEK28.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEqKTGW0AAcgV4.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEqKu7XsAAhgue.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEqLMnWEAAuKb5.png||width="250px"]]
242
243 White men and women have the same cohabitation rates: 7.9% each.
244 Cohabitation rates have plateaued over the past decade.
245 Only 26% of non-Hispanic White women remain in their cohabitant union for at least 3 years before separation. 8% survive 5 years.
246
247 [[image:GeEqSZkXcAAP9GH.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEqS3YXgAAvhXt.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEqTUpWoAAnSJn.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GeEqTzZWEAAsfGK.png||width="250px"]]
248
249 = IR Birth Data =
250
251 From the latest CDC Natality Statistics:
252 For White mother births in 2023 (Excluding unknown):
253 87.6% of fathers are non-Hispanic White
254 5.6% are Hispanic-White
255 3.5% are Black (Hisp and non)
256 2.1% are 2 or more races (H&N)
257 1.2% are Asian (H&N)
258
259 [[image:GeEqgXTXwAAwJwc.png||width="350px"]]
260
261 For White father births in 2023 (Excluding unknown):
262 88% of mothers are non-Hispanic White
263 6.2% are Hispanic-White
264 2% are Asian (Hisp and non)
265 2% are 2 or more races (H&N)
266 1.25% are Black (H&N)
267
268 [[image:GeEqqsCWkAAApq-.png||width="350px"]]
269
270 Broken down by single moms and dads (Excl Unknown):
271 White single mothers, by race of dad:
272 Black: 62%
273 2 or more races: 46%
274 Hispanic-White: 43%
275 Asian: 27.3%
276 Non-Hispanic White: 23%
277 For White single fathers:
278 Black: 42%
279 Hispanic-White: 39%
280 Asian: 27%
Ryan C 87.2 281 Non-Hispanic White: 23%
282
Ryan C 92.1 283 [[image:GeEsXgBXUAAeyHw.png||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEsY1kWUAAeXau.png||width="350px"]]
Ryan C 87.2 284
Ryan C 92.1 285 == Birthrate Trends (2016-2023) ==
Ryan C 87.2 286
Ryan C 92.1 287 Like in all previous years, the overall number of IR births is down since 2016.
288 The increases in percentage (0.1% every 3 years for BM-WW births) isn't due to an increase in their number—rather White-White births have simply declined overall.
Ryan C 87.2 289
Ryan C 92.1 290 [[image:GeEsg7WW4AAN6iJ.jpg||width="350px"]] [[image:GeEshc2XQAAWUsg.png||width="350px"]]
Ryan C 87.2 291
Ryan C 92.1 292 Key points from the CDC data:
293 IR couples with non-Whites have higher rates of single parenthood in every case, especially with Black partners.
294 The birth rate between White women and Asian men is equivalent to White women and Black men, when controlling for population size.
Ryan C 87.2 295
Ryan C 92.1 296 [[image:GeEtBKrXsAA4blT.png||width="350px"]]
Ryan C 87.2 297
Ryan C 92.1 298 Note: the CDC data does not include "Unknown or unstated," thus there's a gap in the data.
299 I'll also be adding relevant racial preference data to this thread for easy reference moving forward.
Ryan C 6.1 300
Ryan C 92.1 301 == Positioning Multiraciality in Cyberspace (2015) ==
Ryan C 6.1 302
Ryan C 92.1 303 A 2015 study wanted to find out where multiracial individuals are positioned in the "racial hierarchies of the dating market."
304 For White women:
305 White > Asian-White > Hispanic-White > Black-White > Hispanic > Asian > Black
Ryan C 6.1 306
Ryan C 92.1 307 [[image:Gee_-pHXUAAjjMJ.png||width="250px"]] [[image:Gee__TCXYAEza7Q.png||width="250px"]] [[image:GefADjfWwAA5pnN.png||width="250px"]]
Ryan C 6.1 308
Ryan C 92.1 309 For Asian women: Asian-White > White > Asian
310 For Asian men: Asian-White > Asian > White
311 For Hispanic women: Hispanic-White > White > Hispanic
312 For Hispanic men: Hispanic > White > Hispanic-White
313 For Black women: White men > Black-White > Black
314 For Black men: Black-White > White > Black
315
316 [[image:GefBKNFXkAAHNcu.jpg||width="250px"]] [[image:GefBK9jXMAA_hOO.jpg||width="250px"]] [[image:GefBLoJWkAAelJW.png||width="250px"]]
317
Ryan C 98.2 318 ----
Ryan C 92.1 319
320 doubt.
321
322 === See Also ===
323
Ryan C 6.1 324 Boochi's Breakdowns
Ryan C 99.2 325
326 {{putFootnotes/}}