Studies: Media

= Media =

{{expandable summary="Study: White Americans’ Preference for Black People in Advertising Has Increased in the Past 66 Years"}}

6

Source: Journal of Advertising Research

7

Date of Publication: 2022

8

Author(s): Peter M. Lenk, Eric T. Bradlow, Randolph E. Bucklin, Sungeun (Clara) Kim

9

Title: "White Americans’ Preference for Black People in Advertising Has Increased in the Past 66 Years: A Meta-Analysis"

10

DOI: 10.2501/JAR-2022-028

11

Subject Matter: Advertising Trends, Racial Representation, Cultural Shifts

12

13

14

**General Observations:**

15

16

Meta-analysis of 74 studies conducted between 1955 and 2020 on racial representation in advertising.

17

18

Sample included mostly White U.S. participants, with consistent tracking of their preferences.

19

20

**Subgroup Analysis:**

21

22

Found a steady increase in positive responses toward Black models/actors in ads by White viewers.

23

24

Recent decades show equal or greater preference for Black faces compared to White ones.

25

26

**Other Significant Data Points:**

27

28

Study frames this shift as a positive move toward diversity, ignoring implications for displaced White cultural representation.

29

30

No equivalent data was collected on Black or Hispanic attitudes toward White representation.

**Primary Observations:**

35

36

White Americans have become increasingly receptive or favorable toward Black figures in advertising, even over timeframes of widespread cultural change.

37

38

These preferences held across product types, media formats, and ad genres.

**Subgroup Trends:**

Studies from the 1960s–1980s showed preference for in-group racial representation, which has dropped sharply for Whites in recent decades.

43

44

The largest positive attitudinal shift occurred between 1995–2020, coinciding with major DEI and cultural programming trends.

45

46

**Specific Case Analysis:**

47

48

The authors position this as “progress,” but offer no critical reflection on the effects of displacing White imagery from national advertising narratives.

49

50

Completely omits consumer preference studies in countries outside the U.S., especially in more homogeneous nations.

**Strengths of the Study:**

55

56

Large-scale dataset across decades provides a clear empirical view of long-term trends.

57

58

Useful as a benchmark of how White American preferences have evolved under sociocultural pressure.

59

60

**Limitations of the Study:**

61

62

Fails to ask whether increasing diversity is consumer-driven or culturally imposed.

63

64

Ignores the potential alienation or displacement of White cultural identity from mainstream advertising.

65

66

Assumes “diverse equals better” without testing economic or emotional impact of those shifts.

67

68

**Suggestions for Improvement:**

69

70

Include non-White viewer reactions to all-White or traditional American imagery for balance.

71

72

Test whether consumers notice racial proportions or experience fatigue from overcorrection.

73

74

Explore regional or class-based variance among White viewers, not just aggregate averages.

Demonstrates how White cultural imagery has been steadily replaced or downplayed in the public sphere.

79

80

Useful for showing how marketing professionals and researchers frame White displacement as “progress.”

81

82

Empirically supports the decline of White in-group preference — possibly due to reeducation, guilt framing, or media saturation.

Study how overrepresentation of minorities in advertising compares to actual demographics.

87

88

Examine whether consumers feel represented or alienated by identity-based marketing.

89

90

Investigate the psychological and cultural impact of long-term demographic displacement in national advertising.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:lenk-et-al-white-americans-preference-for-black-people-in-advertising-has-increased-in-the-past-66-years-a-meta-analysis.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="Study: Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice"}}

99

**Source:** *Journal of Communication*

100

**Date of Publication:** *2020*

101

**Author(s):** *John A. Banas, Lauren L. Miller, David A. Braddock, Sun Kyong Lee*

102

**Title:** *"Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice"*

103

**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqz032](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz032)

104

**Subject Matter:** *Media Psychology, Prejudice Reduction, Intergroup Relations*

105

106

107

1. **General Observations:**

108

- Aggregated **71 studies involving 27,000+ participants**.

109

- Focused on how **media portrayals of out-groups (primarily minorities)** affect attitudes among dominant in-groups (i.e., Whites).

110

111

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

112

- **Fictional entertainment** had stronger effects than news.

113

- **Positive portrayals of minorities** correlated with significant reductions in “prejudice”.

114

115

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

116

- Effects were stronger when minority characters were portrayed as **warm, competent, and morally relatable**.

117

- Contact was more effective when it mimicked **face-to-face friendship narratives**.

1. **Primary Observations:**

122

- Media is a **powerful tool for shaping racial attitudes**, capable of reducing “prejudice” without real-world contact.

123

- **Repeated exposure** to positive portrayals of minorities led to increased acceptance and reduced negative bias.

124

125

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

126

- **White participants** were the primary targets of reconditioning.

127

- Minority participants were not studied in terms of **prejudice against Whites**.

128

129

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

130

- “Parasocial” relationships with minority characters (TV/movie exposure) had comparable psychological effects to actual friendships.

131

- Media framing functioned as a **top-down mechanism for social engineering**, not just passive reflection of society.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

136

- High-quality quantitative meta-analysis with clear design and robust statistical handling.

137

- Acknowledges **media’s ability to alter long-held social beliefs** without physical contact.

138

139

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

140

- Only defines “prejudice” as **negative attitudes from Whites toward minorities** — no exploration of anti-White media narratives or bias.

141

- Ignores the effects of **overexposure to minority portrayals** on cultural alienation or backlash.

142

- Assumes **assimilation into DEI norms is inherently positive**, and any reluctance to accept them is “prejudice”.

143

144

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

145

- Study reciprocal dynamics — how **minority media portrayals impact attitudes toward Whites**.

146

- Investigate whether constant valorization of minorities leads to **resentment, guilt, or political disengagement** among White viewers.

147

- Analyze **media saturation effects**, especially in multicultural propaganda and corporate DEI messaging.

- Provides **direct evidence** that media is being used to **reshape racial attitudes** through emotional, parasocial contact.

152

- Reinforces concern that **“tolerance” is engineered via asymmetric emotional exposure**, not organic consensus.

153

- Useful for documenting how **Whiteness is often treated as a bias to be corrected**, not a culture to be respected.

1. Investigate **reverse parasocial effects** — how negative portrayals of White men affect self-perception and mental health.

158

2. Study how **mass entertainment normalizes demographic shifts** and silences native concerns.

159

3. Compare effects of **Western vs. non-Western media systems** in promoting diversity narratives.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:Banas et al. - 2020 - Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="

168

169

Study: Cultural Voyeurism – A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Interaction"}}

170

**Source:** *Journal of Communication*

171

**Date of Publication:** *2018*

172

**Author(s):** *Osei Appiah*

173

**Title:** *"Cultural Voyeurism: A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Interaction"*

174

**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)

175

**Subject Matter:** *Intergroup contact, racial stereotypes, media, identity formation*

176

177

178

1. **No empirical dataset** — this is a theoretical framework paper, not a quantitative study.

179

2. **Heavily cites prior empirical work**, including:

180

- Czopp & Monteith (2006) on “complimentary stereotypes”

181

- Armstrong et al. (1992), Entman & Rojecki (2000) on media distortion of race

182

- Pettigrew et al. (2011) on intergroup contact

183

184

3. **Statistical implications:** Repeatedly emphasizes the role of media in shaping racial beliefs when direct interracial contact is absent.

1. **Primary Observations:**

189

- Defines *cultural voyeurism* as the process of using media to observe and learn about other racial/ethnic groups.

190

- Claims it can both reinforce stereotypes and reduce prejudice depending on context.

191

- Suggests that Whites’ fascination with Black culture (e.g., hip-hop, athleticism) is a driver of empathy and improved race relations.

192

193

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

194

- White youth are singled out as cultural voyeurs increasingly emulating Black identity for social cachet (“coolness”).

195

- Positive media portrayals of Blacks (e.g., in entertainment) said to reduce racial bias.

196

197

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

198

- No case study provided, but mentions “Duck Dynasty” and “hip-hop culture” as stereotyped White/Black identity constructs respectively.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

203

- Recognizes media’s dual role in shaping intergroup perception.

204

- Accurately captures the obsession with racial “coolness” as a social phenomenon.

205

206

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

207

- Frames White identification with Black culture as inherently progressive, ignoring issues of **anti-White displacement**.

208

- Treats *positive stereotypes of minorities* (e.g., athleticism, musicality) as meaningful substitutes for structural reality.

209

- Lacks any meaningful inquiry into *reverse cultural voyeurism* (i.e., non-Whites voyeuristically consuming and appropriating White identity or values).

210

211

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

212

- Should confront whether “cultural voyeurism” ultimately erodes group boundaries and majority cultural integrity.

213

- Needs empirical validation of claims.

214

- Avoids uncomfortable realities about how White identity is increasingly stigmatized in media — which undermines genuine empathy or parity.

- Helps explain how **media conditioning** primes young Whites to *admire, emulate, and eventually submit* to Black cultural dominance.

219

- Directly supports the narrative that **pro-White identity is systematically delegitimized**, while pro-Black identity is commodified and glamorized — then sold back to White youth.

220

- Useful in chapters/sections covering cultural appropriation *in reverse* — not by Whites, but **of Whiteness** by outsiders for critique and exploitation.

1. Are there longitudinal studies showing cultural voyeurism weakening in-group preference among Whites?

225

2. Does this phenomenon correspond to decreased fertility, civic participation, or political alignment with group interest?

226

3. How do non-Western societies handle voyeuristic consumption of majority culture — do they permit or punish it?

227

228

229