Studies: Media

= Media =

{{expandable summary="Study: Interracial Couples in Ads: Do Consumers' Gender and Racial Differences Affect Their Reactions?"}}

4

**Source:** *Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising*

5

**Date of Publication:** *2018*

6

**Author(s):** *Subodh Bhat, Susan Myers, Marla Royne*

7

**Title:** *"Interracial Couples in Ads: Do Consumers' Gender and Racial Differences Affect Their Reactions?"*

8

**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2018.1428249](https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2018.1428249)

9

**Subject Matter:** *Advertising, Interracial Relationships, Consumer Psychology*

10

11

12

1. **General Observations:**

13

- Participants reacted more negatively to ads featuring Black-White interracial couples than to ads with same-race couples.

14

- Ads with interracial couples caused **significantly more negative emotions** (Mean = 2.49) compared to same-race ads (Mean = 2.03).

15

16

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

17

- No significant differences were found between **Black vs. White participants** or **male vs. female participants** in their reactions.

18

- Both racial groups and genders showed the same negative emotional responses to interracial ads.

19

20

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

21

- The average attitude toward the ad (Aad) was lower for interracial ads (Mean = 3.48) compared to same-race ads (Mean = 3.92).

22

- The average attitude toward the brand (Abrand) was also lower for interracial ads (Mean = 2.93) compared to same-race ads (Mean = 3.29).

1. **Primary Observations:**

27

- Interracial couples in ads generated **more negative emotions** and less favorable evaluations of both the ad and the brand.

28

- This effect was **independent of the participant’s race or gender.**

29

30

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

31

- Although previous studies suggested that women or Whites might react more negatively, this study found **no statistically significant gender or race differences.**

32

33

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

34

- Negative emotional reactions included disgust, anger, irritation, contempt, and worry.

35

- The study used a controlled, fictional coffee brand ad to isolate racial dynamics without brand bias.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

40

- Rigorous controlled experiment with random assignment.

41

- Solid statistical reliability (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.87 for all scales).

42

43

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

44

- Student-only sample, which limits generalizability to the broader population.

45

- Only tested Black-White couples; other interracial pairings were not examined.

46

- Relied on self-reported measures without testing implicit bias.

47

48

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

49

- Future research should explore a wider range of racial pairings (e.g., Asian-White, Hispanic-White).

50

- Testing should include diverse age groups and real consumer markets.

51

- Implicit bias testing should be incorporated to capture subconscious reactions.

- This study provides quantitative confirmation that **interracial romantic pairings in media still face significant consumer resistance,** even among younger generations and across racial lines.

56

- It supports the critique that modern media’s push for interracial depictions may not align with audience preferences, despite corporate DEI trends.

57

- The study shows that backlash to interracial representation is measurable, not just anecdotal.

1. Investigate **longitudinal trends** to see if resistance to interracial ads has decreased since 2018.

62

2. Explore **differences by racial pairing types** (e.g., Asian-White vs. Black-White).

63

3. Examine **implicit bias** alongside explicit attitudes to uncover potential hidden consumer prejudices.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:bhat2018.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="Study: White Americans’ Preference for Black People in Advertising Has Increased in the Past 66 Years"}}

73

Source: Journal of Advertising Research

74

Date of Publication: 2022

75

Author(s): Peter M. Lenk, Eric T. Bradlow, Randolph E. Bucklin, Sungeun (Clara) Kim

76

Title: "White Americans’ Preference for Black People in Advertising Has Increased in the Past 66 Years: A Meta-Analysis"

77

DOI: 10.2501/JAR-2022-028

78

Subject Matter: Advertising Trends, Racial Representation, Cultural Shifts

79

80

81

**General Observations:**

82

83

Meta-analysis of 74 studies conducted between 1955 and 2020 on racial representation in advertising.

84

85

Sample included mostly White U.S. participants, with consistent tracking of their preferences.

86

87

**Subgroup Analysis:**

88

89

Found a steady increase in positive responses toward Black models/actors in ads by White viewers.

90

91

Recent decades show equal or greater preference for Black faces compared to White ones.

92

93

**Other Significant Data Points:**

94

95

Study frames this shift as a positive move toward diversity, ignoring implications for displaced White cultural representation.

96

97

No equivalent data was collected on Black or Hispanic attitudes toward White representation.

**Primary Observations:**

102

103

White Americans have become increasingly receptive or favorable toward Black figures in advertising, even over timeframes of widespread cultural change.

104

105

These preferences held across product types, media formats, and ad genres.

**Subgroup Trends:**

Studies from the 1960s–1980s showed preference for in-group racial representation, which has dropped sharply for Whites in recent decades.

110

111

The largest positive attitudinal shift occurred between 1995–2020, coinciding with major DEI and cultural programming trends.

112

113

**Specific Case Analysis:**

114

115

The authors position this as “progress,” but offer no critical reflection on the effects of displacing White imagery from national advertising narratives.

116

117

Completely omits consumer preference studies in countries outside the U.S., especially in more homogeneous nations.

**Strengths of the Study:**

122

123

Large-scale dataset across decades provides a clear empirical view of long-term trends.

124

125

Useful as a benchmark of how White American preferences have evolved under sociocultural pressure.

126

127

**Limitations of the Study:**

128

129

Fails to ask whether increasing diversity is consumer-driven or culturally imposed.

130

131

Ignores the potential alienation or displacement of White cultural identity from mainstream advertising.

132

133

Assumes “diverse equals better” without testing economic or emotional impact of those shifts.

134

135

**Suggestions for Improvement:**

136

137

Include non-White viewer reactions to all-White or traditional American imagery for balance.

138

139

Test whether consumers notice racial proportions or experience fatigue from overcorrection.

140

141

Explore regional or class-based variance among White viewers, not just aggregate averages.

Demonstrates how White cultural imagery has been steadily replaced or downplayed in the public sphere.

146

147

Useful for showing how marketing professionals and researchers frame White displacement as “progress.”

148

149

Empirically supports the decline of White in-group preference — possibly due to reeducation, guilt framing, or media saturation.

Study how overrepresentation of minorities in advertising compares to actual demographics.

154

155

Examine whether consumers feel represented or alienated by identity-based marketing.

156

157

Investigate the psychological and cultural impact of long-term demographic displacement in national advertising.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:lenk-et-al-white-americans-preference-for-black-people-in-advertising-has-increased-in-the-past-66-years-a-meta-analysis.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="Study: Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice"}}

166

**Source:** *Journal of Communication*

167

**Date of Publication:** *2020*

168

**Author(s):** *John A. Banas, Lauren L. Miller, David A. Braddock, Sun Kyong Lee*

169

**Title:** *"Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice"*

170

**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqz032](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz032)

171

**Subject Matter:** *Media Psychology, Prejudice Reduction, Intergroup Relations*

172

173

174

1. **General Observations:**

175

- Aggregated **71 studies involving 27,000+ participants**.

176

- Focused on how **media portrayals of out-groups (primarily minorities)** affect attitudes among dominant in-groups (i.e., Whites).

177

178

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

179

- **Fictional entertainment** had stronger effects than news.

180

- **Positive portrayals of minorities** correlated with significant reductions in “prejudice”.

181

182

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

183

- Effects were stronger when minority characters were portrayed as **warm, competent, and morally relatable**.

184

- Contact was more effective when it mimicked **face-to-face friendship narratives**.

1. **Primary Observations:**

189

- Media is a **powerful tool for shaping racial attitudes**, capable of reducing “prejudice” without real-world contact.

190

- **Repeated exposure** to positive portrayals of minorities led to increased acceptance and reduced negative bias.

191

192

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

193

- **White participants** were the primary targets of reconditioning.

194

- Minority participants were not studied in terms of **prejudice against Whites**.

195

196

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

197

- “Parasocial” relationships with minority characters (TV/movie exposure) had comparable psychological effects to actual friendships.

198

- Media framing functioned as a **top-down mechanism for social engineering**, not just passive reflection of society.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

203

- High-quality quantitative meta-analysis with clear design and robust statistical handling.

204

- Acknowledges **media’s ability to alter long-held social beliefs** without physical contact.

205

206

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

207

- Only defines “prejudice” as **negative attitudes from Whites toward minorities** — no exploration of anti-White media narratives or bias.

208

- Ignores the effects of **overexposure to minority portrayals** on cultural alienation or backlash.

209

- Assumes **assimilation into DEI norms is inherently positive**, and any reluctance to accept them is “prejudice”.

210

211

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

212

- Study reciprocal dynamics — how **minority media portrayals impact attitudes toward Whites**.

213

- Investigate whether constant valorization of minorities leads to **resentment, guilt, or political disengagement** among White viewers.

214

- Analyze **media saturation effects**, especially in multicultural propaganda and corporate DEI messaging.

- Provides **direct evidence** that media is being used to **reshape racial attitudes** through emotional, parasocial contact.

219

- Reinforces concern that **“tolerance” is engineered via asymmetric emotional exposure**, not organic consensus.

220

- Useful for documenting how **Whiteness is often treated as a bias to be corrected**, not a culture to be respected.

1. Investigate **reverse parasocial effects** — how negative portrayals of White men affect self-perception and mental health.

225

2. Study how **mass entertainment normalizes demographic shifts** and silences native concerns.

226

3. Compare effects of **Western vs. non-Western media systems** in promoting diversity narratives.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:Banas et al. - 2020 - Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="

235

236

Study: Cultural Voyeurism – A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Interaction"}}

237

**Source:** *Journal of Communication*

238

**Date of Publication:** *2018*

239

**Author(s):** *Osei Appiah*

240

**Title:** *"Cultural Voyeurism: A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Interaction"*

241

**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)

242

**Subject Matter:** *Intergroup contact, racial stereotypes, media, identity formation*

243

244

245

1. **No empirical dataset** — this is a theoretical framework paper, not a quantitative study.

246

2. **Heavily cites prior empirical work**, including:

247

- Czopp & Monteith (2006) on “complimentary stereotypes”

248

- Armstrong et al. (1992), Entman & Rojecki (2000) on media distortion of race

249

- Pettigrew et al. (2011) on intergroup contact

250

251

3. **Statistical implications:** Repeatedly emphasizes the role of media in shaping racial beliefs when direct interracial contact is absent.

1. **Primary Observations:**

256

- Defines *cultural voyeurism* as the process of using media to observe and learn about other racial/ethnic groups.

257

- Claims it can both reinforce stereotypes and reduce prejudice depending on context.

258

- Suggests that Whites’ fascination with Black culture (e.g., hip-hop, athleticism) is a driver of empathy and improved race relations.

259

260

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

261

- White youth are singled out as cultural voyeurs increasingly emulating Black identity for social cachet (“coolness”).

262

- Positive media portrayals of Blacks (e.g., in entertainment) said to reduce racial bias.

263

264

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

265

- No case study provided, but mentions “Duck Dynasty” and “hip-hop culture” as stereotyped White/Black identity constructs respectively.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

270

- Recognizes media’s dual role in shaping intergroup perception.

271

- Accurately captures the obsession with racial “coolness” as a social phenomenon.

272

273

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

274

- Frames White identification with Black culture as inherently progressive, ignoring issues of **anti-White displacement**.

275

- Treats *positive stereotypes of minorities* (e.g., athleticism, musicality) as meaningful substitutes for structural reality.

276

- Lacks any meaningful inquiry into *reverse cultural voyeurism* (i.e., non-Whites voyeuristically consuming and appropriating White identity or values).

277

278

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

279

- Should confront whether “cultural voyeurism” ultimately erodes group boundaries and majority cultural integrity.

280

- Needs empirical validation of claims.

281

- Avoids uncomfortable realities about how White identity is increasingly stigmatized in media — which undermines genuine empathy or parity.

- Helps explain how **media conditioning** primes young Whites to *admire, emulate, and eventually submit* to Black cultural dominance.

286

- Directly supports the narrative that **pro-White identity is systematically delegitimized**, while pro-Black identity is commodified and glamorized — then sold back to White youth.

287

- Useful in chapters/sections covering cultural appropriation *in reverse* — not by Whites, but **of Whiteness** by outsiders for critique and exploitation.

1. Are there longitudinal studies showing cultural voyeurism weakening in-group preference among Whites?

292

2. Does this phenomenon correspond to decreased fertility, civic participation, or political alignment with group interest?

293

3. How do non-Western societies handle voyeuristic consumption of majority culture — do they permit or punish it?

294

295

296