... |
... |
@@ -133,3 +133,73 @@ |
133 |
133 |
[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.3109_10826087709027235.pdf]] |
134 |
134 |
{{/expandable}} |
135 |
135 |
{{/expandable}} |
|
136 |
+ |
|
137 |
+{{expandable summary="Study: Racial Differences in Marijuana Users’ Risk of Arrest in the United States"}} |
|
138 |
+**Source:** *Drug and Alcohol Dependence* |
|
139 |
+**Date of Publication:** *2006* |
|
140 |
+**Author(s):** *Rajeev Ramchand, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, Martin Y. Iguchi* |
|
141 |
+**Title:** *"Racial Differences in Marijuana Users’ Risk of Arrest in the United States"* |
|
142 |
+**DOI:** [10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.02.010](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.02.010) |
|
143 |
+**Subject Matter:** *Marijuana Use, Policing, Racial Disparities, Drug Markets* |
|
144 |
+ |
|
145 |
+{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} |
|
146 |
+1. **General Observations:** |
|
147 |
+ - African Americans are **2.5× more likely** to be arrested for marijuana possession than Whites. |
|
148 |
+ - Arrest disparity persists **despite similar usage rates** between groups. |
|
149 |
+ |
|
150 |
+2. **Subgroup Analysis:** |
|
151 |
+ - African Americans were: |
|
152 |
+ - **Twice as likely** to buy outdoors (0.31 vs. 0.14) |
|
153 |
+ - **Three times as likely** to buy from a stranger (0.30 vs. 0.09) |
|
154 |
+ - **More likely** to buy away from home (0.61 vs. 0.48) |
|
155 |
+ |
|
156 |
+3. **Other Significant Data Points:** |
|
157 |
+ - Over **39% of all U.S. drug arrests in 2002** were for marijuana possession. |
|
158 |
+ - Nearly **80% of the increase in drug arrests from 1990–2002** was due to marijuana alone. |
|
159 |
+{{/expandable}} |
|
160 |
+ |
|
161 |
+{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} |
|
162 |
+1. **Primary Observations:** |
|
163 |
+ - **Differences in purchasing behavior** partially explain racial arrest disparities. |
|
164 |
+ - Riskier purchasing settings (outdoors, strangers, away from home) increase arrest probability. |
|
165 |
+ |
|
166 |
+2. **Subgroup Trends:** |
|
167 |
+ - African Americans’ higher arrest rates are linked more to **behavioral exposure** than usage frequency. |
|
168 |
+ - Purchasing from strangers and in public **correlates with law enforcement encounters**. |
|
169 |
+ |
|
170 |
+3. **Specific Case Analysis:** |
|
171 |
+ - Results based on **2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)**. |
|
172 |
+ - Multivariate regression models confirm **race remains a significant predictor** even after controlling for demographics and behaviors. |
|
173 |
+{{/expandable}} |
|
174 |
+ |
|
175 |
+{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} |
|
176 |
+1. **Strengths of the Study:** |
|
177 |
+ - Uses **nationally representative survey data** and robust statistical modeling. |
|
178 |
+ - Separates **usage rates from behavior-related arrest risks**. |
|
179 |
+ |
|
180 |
+2. **Limitations of the Study:** |
|
181 |
+ - Focused specifically on **marijuana**, may not generalize to other drugs. |
|
182 |
+ - **Does not directly test law enforcement bias**, only behavioral correlates of arrest risk. |
|
183 |
+ |
|
184 |
+3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** |
|
185 |
+ - Include **law enforcement data** on arrest locations and procedures. |
|
186 |
+ - Extend model to **longitudinal outcomes** (repeat arrest, conviction). |
|
187 |
+{{/expandable}} |
|
188 |
+ |
|
189 |
+{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} |
|
190 |
+- Supports the argument that **behavioral patterns—not usage rates—drive racial arrest disparities**. |
|
191 |
+- Highlights **systemic vulnerability among Black marijuana users** due to social context of purchases. |
|
192 |
+- Reinforces critique of **“race-neutral” enforcement** in drug policy discussions. |
|
193 |
+{{/expandable}} |
|
194 |
+ |
|
195 |
+{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} |
|
196 |
+1. Study **how police patrol patterns** correlate with outdoor purchasing risk. |
|
197 |
+2. Investigate **racial profiling in drug arrests** beyond behavioral correlates. |
|
198 |
+3. Compare marijuana purchase risks in **urban vs. suburban contexts**. |
|
199 |
+{{/expandable}} |
|
200 |
+ |
|
201 |
+{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} |
|
202 |
+[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.drugalcdep.2006.02.010.pdf]] |
|
203 |
+{{/expandable}} |
|
204 |
+{{/expandable}} |
|
205 |
+ |