Research at a Glance

= Research at a Glance =

Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various important Racial themes. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout. I wanted to make this for a couple of reasons. Number one is organization. There are a ton of useful studies out there that expose the truth, sometimes inadvertently. You'll notice that in this initial draft the summaries are often woke and reflect the bias of the AI writing them as well as the researchers politically correct conclusion in most cases. That's because I haven't gotten to going through and pointing out the reasons I put all of them in here.

9

10

11

There is often an underlying hypocrisy or double standard, saying the quiet part out loud, or conclusions that are so much of an antithesis to what the data shows that made me want to include it. At least, thats the idea for once its polished. I have about 150 more studies to upload, so it will be a few weeks before I get through it all. Until such time, feel free to search for them yourself and edit in what you find, or add your own studies. If you like you can do it manually, or if you'd rather go the route I did, just rename the study to its doi number and feed the study into an AI and tell them to summarize the study using the following format:

- Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.

16

- Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.

17

- Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.

18

- If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.

19

- You'll also find a download link to the original full study in pdf form at the bottom of the collapsible block.

= Genetics =

{{expandable summary="

26

27

28

Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}

29

**Source:** *Nature*

30

**Date of Publication:** *2009*

31

**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*

32

**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*

33

**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)

34

**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*

35

36

37

1. **General Observations:**

38

- Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.

39

- Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.

40

41

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

42

- ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.

43

- ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.

44

45

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

46

- ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.

47

- **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.

1. **Primary Observations:**

52

- The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.

53

- Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.

54

55

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

56

- **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.

57

- **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.

58

59

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

60

- **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.

61

- Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

66

- **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.

67

- Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.

68

69

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

70

- Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.

71

- Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.

72

73

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

74

- Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.

75

- Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.

- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.

80

- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.

81

- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.

1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.

86

2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.

87

3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}

96

**Source:** *Nature*

97

**Date of Publication:** *2016*

98

**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*

99

**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*

100

**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)

101

**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*

102

103

104

1. **General Observations:**

105

- Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.

106

- Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.

107

108

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

109

- Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.

110

- Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.

111

112

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

113

- Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.

114

- Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.

1. **Primary Observations:**

119

- **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.

120

- Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.

121

122

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

123

- **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.

124

- **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.

125

126

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

127

- **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.

128

- African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

133

- **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.

134

- High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.

135

136

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

137

- **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.

138

- Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.

139

140

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

141

- Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.

142

- Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.

- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.

147

- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.

148

- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.

1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.

153

2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.

154

3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="

163

164

Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}

165

**Source:** *Nature Genetics*

166

**Date of Publication:** *2015*

167

**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*

168

**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*

169

**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)

170

**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*

171

172

173

1. **General Observations:**

174

- Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.

175

- Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.

176

177

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

178

- Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.

179

- **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.

180

181

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

182

- **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.

183

- Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.

1. **Primary Observations:**

188

- Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.

189

- The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.

190

191

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

192

- **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (70-80%)**.

193

- **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.

194

195

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

196

- Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.

197

- The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

202

- **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.

203

- Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.

204

205

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

206

- **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.

207

- Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.

208

209

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

210

- Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.

211

- **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.

- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.

216

- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.

217

- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.

1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.

222

2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.

223

3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="

232

233

Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}

234

**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*

235

**Date of Publication:** *2002*

236

**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*

237

**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*

238

**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)

239

**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*

240

241

242

1. **General Observations:**

243

- Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.

244

- The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.

245

246

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

247

- African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.

248

- **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.

249

250

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

251

- The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.

252

- LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.

1. **Primary Observations:**

257

- African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.

258

- Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.

259

260

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

261

- **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.

262

- Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.

263

264

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

265

- Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.

266

- SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

271

- Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.

272

- Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.

273

274

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

275

- Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.

276

- Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.

277

278

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

279

- Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.

280

- Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.

- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.

285

- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.

286

- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.

1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.

291

2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.

292

3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="

301

302

Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}

303

**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*

304

**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*

305

**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*

306

**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*

307

**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)

308

**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*

309

310

311

1. **General Observations:**

312

- Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.

313

- Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.

314

315

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

316

- Examines **West Eurasian populations** and their genetic evolution.

317

- Tracks **changes in allele frequencies over millennia**.

318

319

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

320

- **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.

321

- **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.

1. **Primary Observations:**

326

- **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.

327

- Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.

328

329

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

330

- Selection pressure on **energy storage genes** supports the **Thrifty Gene Hypothesis**.

331

- **Cognitive performance-related alleles** have undergone selection, but their historical advantages remain unclear.

332

333

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

334

- **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.

335

- **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.

336

- **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

341

- **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.

342

- Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.

343

344

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

345

- Findings **may not translate directly** to modern populations.

346

- **Unclear whether observed selection pressures persist today**.

347

348

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

349

- Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.

350

- Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.

- Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.

355

- Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.

356

- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.

1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.

361

2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.

362

3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}

371

**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*

372

**Date of Publication:** *2013*

373

**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*

374

**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*

375

**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)

376

**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*

377

378

379

1. **General Observations:**

380

- The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.

381

- Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.

382

383

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

384

- Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.

385

- Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.

386

387

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

388

- Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.

389

- IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.

1. **Primary Observations:**

394

- Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.

395

- Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.

396

397

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

398

- Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.

399

- Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.

400

401

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

402

- Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.

403

- Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

408

- **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.

409

- **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.

410

411

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

412

- Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.

413

- **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.

414

415

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

416

- Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.

417

- Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.

- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.

422

- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.

423

- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.

1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.

428

2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.

429

3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}

438

**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*

439

**Date of Publication:** *2010*

440

**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*

441

**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*

442

**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)

443

**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*

444

445

446

1. **General Observations:**

447

- The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.

448

- Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.

449

450

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

451

- Discusses **four primary definitions of race/subspecies**: Essentialist, Taxonomic, Population-based, and Lineage-based.

452

- Suggests that **human heterozygosity levels are comparable to species that are classified as polytypic**.

453

454

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

455

- The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.

456

- Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.

1. **Primary Observations:**

461

- Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.

462

- Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.

463

464

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

465

- Discusses **how race concepts evolved over time** in biological sciences.

466

- Compares **human diversity with that of other primates** such as chimpanzees and gorillas.

467

468

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

469

- Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.

470

- Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

475

- Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.

476

- Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.

477

478

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

479

- Controversial topic with **strong opposing views in anthropology and genetics**.

480

- **Relies on broad genetic trends**, but does not analyze individual-level genetic variation in depth.

481

482

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

483

- Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.

484

- Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.

- Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.

489

- Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.

490

- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.

1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.

495

2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.

496

3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]

= IQ =

{{expandable summary="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}

507

**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*

508

**Date of Publication:** *2019*

509

**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*

510

**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*

511

**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)

512

**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*

513

514

515

1. **General Observations:**

516

- Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.

517

- Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.

518

519

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

520

- **90% of experts were from Western countries**, and **83% were male**.

521

- Political spectrum ranged from **54% left-liberal, 24% conservative**, with significant ideological influences on views.

522

523

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

524

- Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.

525

- **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.

1. **Primary Observations:**

530

- Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.

531

- **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.

532

533

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

534

- **Left-leaning experts were more likely to reject genetic explanations for group IQ differences**.

535

- **Right-leaning experts tended to favor a stronger role for genetic factors** in intelligence disparities.

536

537

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

538

- The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.

539

- Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

544

- **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.

545

- Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.

546

547

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

548

- **Sample primarily from Western countries**, limiting global perspectives.

549

- Self-selection bias may skew responses toward **those more willing to engage with controversial topics**.

550

551

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

552

- Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.

553

- Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.

- Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.

558

- Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.

559

- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.

1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.

564

2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.

565

3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}

574

**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*

575

**Date of Publication:** *2015*

576

**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*

577

**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*

578

**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)

579

**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*

580

581

582

1. **General Observations:**

583

- Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.

584

- Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.

585

586

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

587

- Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.

588

- **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.

589

590

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

591

- GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.

592

- Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.

1. **Primary Observations:**

597

- Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.

598

- Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.

599

600

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

601

- **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.

602

- **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.

603

604

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

605

- Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.

606

- Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

611

- **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.

612

- Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.

613

614

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

615

- **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.

616

- **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.

617

618

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

619

- Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.

620

- Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.

- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.

625

- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.

626

- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.

1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.

631

2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.

632

3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding"}}

641

**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology

642

**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15

643

**Author(s):** Smith et al.

644

**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"

645

**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)

646

**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science

= Dating =

{{expandable summary="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}

652

**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*

653

**Date of Publication:** *2020*

654

**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*

655

**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*

656

**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)

657

**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*

658

659

660

1. **General Observations:**

661

- Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.

662

- Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.

663

664

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

665

- Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.

666

- Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.

667

668

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

669

- Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.

670

- Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.

1. **Primary Observations:**

675

- A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.

676

- Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.

677

678

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

679

- More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.

680

- No major change observed for **married adults** over time.

681

682

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

683

- **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.

684

- Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

689

- **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.

690

- **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.

691

692

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

693

- Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.

694

- No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.

695

696

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

697

- Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.

698

- Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.

- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.

703

- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.

1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.

708

2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.

{{expandable summary="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}

717

**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*

718

**Date of Publication:** *2012*

719

**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*

720

**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*

721

**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)

722

**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*

723

724

725

1. **General Observations:**

726

- Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.

727

- **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.

728

729

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

730

- **Maternal race had a stronger influence than paternal race** on birth outcomes.

731

- **Black mother–White father (BMWF) couples** had a higher risk than **White mother–Black father (WMBF) couples**.

732

733

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

734

- **Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for key outcomes:**

735

- **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).

736

- **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).

737

- **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).

1. **Primary Observations:**

742

- **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.

743

- **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.

744

745

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

746

- **Black mothers (regardless of paternal race) had the highest risk of LBW and PTB**.

747

- **White mothers with Black fathers had a lower risk** than Black mothers with White fathers.

748

749

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

750

- The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.

751

- **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

756

- **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.

757

- Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.

758

759

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

760

- Data limited to **Black-White biracial couples**, excluding other racial groups.

761

- **Socioeconomic and healthcare access factors** not fully explored.

762

763

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

764

- Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.

765

- Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.

- Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.

770

- Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.

771

- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.

1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.

776

2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.

777

3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}

786

**Source:** *Current Psychology*

787

**Date of Publication:** *2024*

788

**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*

789

**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*

790

**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)

791

**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*

792

793

794

1. **General Observations:**

795

- Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.

796

- Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.

797

798

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

799

- Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.

800

- **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.

801

802

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

803

- 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.

804

- **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.

1. **Primary Observations:**

809

- Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.

810

- Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.

811

812

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

813

- **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.

814

- **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.

815

816

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

817

- Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.

818

- Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

823

- **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.

824

- **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.

825

826

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

827

- Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.

828

- **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.

829

830

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

831

- Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.

832

- Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.

- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.

837

- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.

838

- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.

1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.

843

2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.

844

3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]

= Crime and Substance Abuse =

853

854

{{expandable summary="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}

855

**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*

856

**Date of Publication:** *2002*

857

**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*

858

**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*

859

**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)

860

**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*

861

862

863

1. **General Observations:**

864

- Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.

865

- Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.

866

867

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

868

- Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.

869

- **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.

870

871

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

872

- **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.

873

- Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.

1. **Primary Observations:**

878

- **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.

879

- **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.

880

881

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

882

- White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.

883

- Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.

884

885

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

886

- **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.

887

- Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

892

- **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.

893

- Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.

894

895

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

896

- Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.

897

- Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.

898

899

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

900

- Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.

901

- Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.

- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.

906

- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.

907

- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.

1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.

912

2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.

913

3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}

922

**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*

923

**Date of Publication:** *2003*

924

**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*

925

**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*

926

**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)

927

**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*

928

929

930

1. **General Observations:**

931

- Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.

932

- Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.

933

934

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

935

- Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.

936

- **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.

937

938

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

939

- **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.

940

- **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.

1. **Primary Observations:**

945

- Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.

946

- **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.

947

948

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

949

- White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.

950

- Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.

951

952

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

953

- Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.

954

- **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

959

- **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.

960

- Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.

961

962

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

963

- Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.

964

- Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.

965

966

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

967

- Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).

968

- Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.

- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.

973

- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.

974

- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.

1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.

979

2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.

980

3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}

989

**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*

990

**Date of Publication:** *2002*

991

**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*

992

**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*

993

**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)

994

**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*

995

996

997

1. **General Observations:**

998

- Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.

999

- Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.

1000

1001

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

1002

- Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.

1003

- **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.

1004

1005

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

1006

- **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.

1007

- Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.

1. **Primary Observations:**

1012

- **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.

1013

- **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.

1014

1015

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

1016

- White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.

1017

- Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.

1018

1019

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

1020

- **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.

1021

- Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

1026

- **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.

1027

- Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.

1028

1029

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

1030

- Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.

1031

- Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.

1032

1033

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

1034

- Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.

1035

- Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.

- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.

1040

- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.

1041

- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.

1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.

1046

2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.

1047

3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="

1056

1057

1058

Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}

1059

**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*

1060

**Date of Publication:** *2014*

1061

**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*

1062

**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*

1063

**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)

1064

**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*

1065

1066

1067

1. **General Observations:**

1068

- The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.

1069

- Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.

1070

1071

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

1072

- The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.

1073

- Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.

1074

1075

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

1076

- The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.

1077

- Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.

1. **Primary Observations:**

1082

- Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.

1083

- Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.

1084

1085

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

1086

- A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.

1087

- Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.

1088

1089

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

1090

- Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.

1091

- Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

1096

- **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.

1097

- **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.

1098

1099

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

1100

- Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.

1101

- **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.

1102

1103

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

1104

- Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.

1105

- Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.

- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.

1110

- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.

1111

- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.

1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.

1116

2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.

1117

3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]

= Whiteness & White Guilt =

1126

1127

{{expandable summary="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}

1128

**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*

1129

**Date of Publication:** *2019*

1130

**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*

1131

**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*

1132

**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)

1133

**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*

1134

1135

1136

1. **General Observations:**

1137

- Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.

1138

- Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.

1139

1140

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

1141

- **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.

1142

- **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.

1143

1144

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

1145

- White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.

1146

- Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.

1. **Primary Observations:**

1151

- Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.

1152

- Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.

1153

1154

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

1155

- **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.

1156

- **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.

1157

1158

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

1159

- Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.

1160

- Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

1165

- **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.

1166

- Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.

1167

1168

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

1169

- Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.

1170

- Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.

1171

1172

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

1173

- Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.

1174

- Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.

- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.

1179

- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.

1180

- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.

1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.

1185

2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.

1186

3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}

1195

**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*

1196

**Date of Publication:** *2016*

1197

**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*

1198

**Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*

1199

**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)

1200

**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*

1201

1202

1203

1. **General Observations:**

1204

- Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.

1205

- Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.

1206

1207

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

1208

- **50% of medical students surveyed endorsed at least one false belief about biological differences**.

1209

- Participants who held these false beliefs were **more likely to underestimate Black patients’ pain levels**.

1210

1211

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

1212

- **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.

1213

- The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.

1. **Primary Observations:**

1218

- False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.

1219

- Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.

1220

1221

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

1222

- Physicians who **did not endorse these beliefs** showed **no racial bias** in treatment recommendations.

1223

- Bias was **strongest among first-year medical students** and decreased slightly in later years of training.

1224

1225

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

1226

- Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.

1227

- The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

1232

- **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.

1233

- Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.

1234

1235

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

1236

- The study focuses on **Black vs. white disparities**, leaving other racial/ethnic groups unexplored.

1237

- Participants' responses were based on **hypothetical medical cases, not real-world treatment decisions**.

1238

1239

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

1240

- Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.

1241

- Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.

- Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.

1246

- Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.

1247

- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.

1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.

1252

2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.

1253

3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}

1262

**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*

1263

**Date of Publication:** *2015*

1264

**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*

1265

**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*

1266

**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)

1267

**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*

1268

1269

1270

1. **General Observations:**

1271

- Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.

1272

- This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.

1273

1274

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

1275

- The increase was **most pronounced among those with a high school education or less**.

1276

- Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic mortality continued to decline over the same period.

1277

1278

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

1279

- Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.

1280

- Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.

1. **Primary Observations:**

1285

- The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.

1286

- The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.

1287

1288

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

1289

- The **largest mortality increases** occurred among **whites without a college degree**.

1290

- Chronic pain, functional limitations, and self-reported mental distress **rose significantly in affected groups**.

1291

1292

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

1293

- **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.

1294

- Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

1299

- **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.

1300

- Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.

1301

1302

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

1303

- Does not establish **causality** between economic decline and increased mortality.

1304

- Lacks **granular data on opioid prescribing patterns and regional differences**.

1305

1306

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

1307

- Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.

1308

- Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.

- Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.

1313

- Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.

1314

- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.

1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.

1319

2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.

1320

3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}

1329

**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*

1330

**Date of Publication:** *2023*

1331

**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*

1332

**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*

1333

**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)

1334

**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*

1335

1336

1337

1. **General Observations:**

1338

- Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.

1339

- Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.

1340

1341

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

1342

- Explores differences in **integration, social interactions, and perceptions of diversity**.

1343

- Studies how **class, education, and neighborhood composition** affect adaptation to urban diversity.

1344

1345

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

1346

- The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.

1347

- **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.

1. **Primary Observations:**

1352

- The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.

1353

- Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.

1354

1355

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

1356

- Young, educated individuals in urban areas **are more open to cultural diversity**.

1357

- Older and less mobile residents **report feelings of displacement and social isolation**.

1358

1359

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

1360

- Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.

1361

- Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

1366

- **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.

1367

- Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.

1368

1369

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

1370

- Limited to **Western European urban settings**, missing perspectives from other global regions.

1371

- Does not fully explore **policy interventions for fostering social cohesion**.

1372

1373

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

1374

- Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.

1375

- Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.

- Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.

1380

- Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.

1381

- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.

1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.

1386

2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.

1387

3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]

= Media =

{{expandable summary="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic"}}

1397

**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*

1398

**Date of Publication:** *2021*

1399

**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*

1400

**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*

1401

**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)

1402

**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*

1403

1404

1405

1. **General Observations:**

1406

- Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.

1407

- Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.

1408

1409

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

1410

- **Anonymity and reduced social cues** in CMC increased hostility.

1411

- **Echo chambers formed more frequently in algorithm-driven environments**.

1412

1413

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

1414

- **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.

1415

- Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.

1. **Primary Observations:**

1420

- **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.

1421

- **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.

1422

1423

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

1424

- Participants with **strong pre-existing biases became more polarized** after exposure to conflicting views.

1425

- **Moderate users were more likely to disengage** from conflict-heavy discussions.

1426

1427

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

1428

- **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.

1429

- **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

1434

- **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.

1435

- Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.

1436

1437

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

1438

- Lacks **qualitative analysis of user motivations**.

1439

- Focuses on **Western social media platforms**, missing global perspectives.

1440

1441

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

1442

- Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.

1443

- Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.

- Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.

1448

- Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.

1449

- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.

1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.

1454

2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.

1455

3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}

1464

**Source:** *Politics & Policy*

1465

**Date of Publication:** *2007*

1466

**Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*

1467

**Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*

1468

**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)

1469

**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*

1470

1471

1472

1. **General Observations:**

1473

- Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.

1474

- Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.

1475

1476

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

1477

- **Equality-based framing decreases opposition** to same-sex marriage.

1478

- **Morality-based framing increases opposition** to same-sex marriage.

1479

1480

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

1481

- When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.

1482

- Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.

1. **Primary Observations:**

1487

- **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.

1488

- **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.

1489

1490

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

1491

- **Religious and conservative audiences** respond more to morality-based framing.

1492

- **Younger and progressive audiences** respond more to equality-based framing.

1493

1494

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

1495

- **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.

1496

- **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

1501

- **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.

1502

- Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.

1503

1504

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

1505

- Focuses **only on U.S. media coverage**, limiting global applicability.

1506

- Does not account for **social media's growing influence** on public opinion.

1507

1508

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

1509

- Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.

1510

- Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.

- Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.

1515

- Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.

1516

- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.

1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.

1521

2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.

1522

3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]

{{expandable summary="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}

1531

**Source:** *Journal of Communication*

1532

**Date of Publication:** *2019*

1533

**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*

1534

**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*

1535

**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)

1536

**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*

1537

1538

1539

1. **General Observations:**

1540

- Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.

1541

- **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.

1542

1543

2. **Subgroup Analysis:**

1544

- **Video-based content was 2x more persuasive** than text-based content.

1545

- Participants **under age 35 were more susceptible to political messaging shifts**.

1546

1547

3. **Other Significant Data Points:**

1548

- **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.

1549

- **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.

1. **Primary Observations:**

1554

- **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.

1555

- **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.

1556

1557

2. **Subgroup Trends:**

1558

- **Social media platforms had stronger persuasive effects** than news websites.

1559

- Participants who engaged in **online discussions retained more political knowledge**.

1560

1561

3. **Specific Case Analysis:**

1562

- **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.

1563

- **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.

1. **Strengths of the Study:**

1568

- **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.

1569

- Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.

1570

1571

2. **Limitations of the Study:**

1572

- Limited to **short-term persuasion effects**, without long-term follow-up.

1573

- Does not explore **the role of misinformation in political persuasion**.

1574

1575

3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**

1576

- Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.

1577

- Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.

- Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.

1582

- Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.

1583

- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.

1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.

1588

2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.

1589

3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.

[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]

1594

1595

1596

Wiki source code of Research at a Glance

Quick Links

Categories