Skip to Content

Register
Log-in
Search
- The Free Speech / Pro White Wiki
- Page Index
- User Index
- Global
- What's New
- Wiki Index

0.0
1
2
3
4
5

0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From 119.1 to 120.1 From 121.1 to 122.1

From version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/06/19 06:04

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version

edited by XWikiGuest
on 2025/06/19 19:12

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Author

@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
--XWiki.AdminAngriff
++XWiki.XWikiGuest

Content

@@ -717,6 +717,146 @@
  {{/expandable}}
++{{expandable summary="Study: “A Little More Ghetto, a Little Less Cultured”: Are There Racial Stereotypes about Interracial Daters?"}}
++**Source:** *Sociology of Race and Ethnicity*
++**Date of Publication:** *2020*
++**Author(s):** *Andrew R. Flores and Ariela Schachter*
++**Title:** *"“A Little More Ghetto, a Little Less Cultured”: Are There Racial Stereotypes about Interracial Daters?"*
++**DOI:** [10.1177/2332649219871232](https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649219871232)
++**Subject Matter:** *Interracial Dating, Racial Stereotyping, Online Behavior*
++
++{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
++1. **General Observations:**
++   - Used **experimental survey data** from a nationally representative sample (N = 1,070).
++   - Participants evaluated hypothetical dating profiles of White individuals who expressed interest in Black, Latino, or Asian partners.
++
++2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
++   - **White men interested in Black women** were rated as **less cultured, more aggressive, and lower class**.
++   - White women interested in Black men were **viewed as less intelligent and more promiscuous**.
++   - **Interest in Asian partners** did not carry the same negative stereotypes; in some cases, it improved perceived desirability.
++
++3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
++   - **Latino partners** were seen more neutrally, though men who dated them were seen as more “dominant.”
++   - Across the board, **Whites who dated within their race were viewed most favorably**.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
++1. **Primary Observations:**
++   - Interracial daters—especially those dating Black individuals—are **subject to negative assumptions** about intelligence, class, and morality.
++   - Stereotypes persist even in **hypothetical online contexts**, showing deep cultural associations.
++
++2. **Subgroup Trends:**
++   - White men who prefer Black women face **masculinity-linked stigma**, often tied to “urban” or “ghetto” tropes.
++   - White women dating Black men are **framed as sexually deviant or socially undesirable**, particularly by other Whites.
++
++3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
++   - The most negatively perceived pairing was **White woman/Black man**, reinforcing long-standing cultural anxieties.
++   - Respondents judged interracial daters not just by race but by **projected cultural assimilation or rejection**.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
++1. **Strengths of the Study:**
++   - Reveals **latent racial boundaries** in contemporary dating preferences.
++   - Uses **controlled experimental design** to expose socially unacceptable but real biases.
++
++2. **Limitations of the Study:**
++   - Relies on **self-reported reactions to profiles**, not real-world dating behavior.
++   - **Fails to analyze anti-White framing** in the assumptions about White participants who prefer other races.
++   - Assumes stigma is irrational without investigating **rational in-group preference or cultural concerns**.
++
++3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
++   - Include **reverse scenarios** (e.g., Black or Latino individuals expressing preference for Whites).
++   - Examine how **media portrayal of interracial couples** influences perception and desirability.
++   - Account for **class and education overlaps** that could explain perceived traits.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
++- Highlights how **Whites who date outside their race—particularly with Blacks—are pathologized**, even within their own community.
++- Shows that **Whiteness is penalized** when paired with non-Whiteness, reinforcing social costs for racial mixing.
++- Useful for understanding **how stigma around interracial relationships is unevenly applied**, with anti-White moral overtones.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
++1. Study how **in-group dating preferences differ across races** and are morally interpreted.
++2. Investigate how **class and education** affect perceptions of interracial relationships.
++3. Examine whether **Whites are disproportionately judged** when deviating from group norms vs. other races.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
++[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1177_2332649219871232.pdf]]
++{{/expandable}}
++{{/expandable}}
++
++
++{{expandable summary="Study: E Pluribus, Pauciores (Out of Many, Fewer): Diversity and Birth Rates"}}
++**Source:** *National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)*
++**Date of Publication:** *2024*
++**Author(s):** *Umit Gurun, Daniel Solomon*
++**Title:** *"E Pluribus, Pauciores (Out of Many, Fewer): Diversity and Birth Rates"*
++**DOI:** [10.3386/w31978](https://doi.org/10.3386/w31978)
++**Subject Matter:** *Demography, Social Cohesion, Diversity Effects on Fertility*
++
++{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
++1. **General Observations:**
++   - Used large-scale demographic, economic, and census data across **1,800+ U.S. counties**.
++   - Found a **strong negative correlation between local diversity and White fertility rates**.
++   - Quantified impact: a 1 SD increase in ethnic diversity leads to a **4–6% drop in birth rates**.
++
++2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
++   - Decline most pronounced among **non-Hispanic Whites**, especially in suburban and semi-urban areas.
++   - **No significant birth rate drop observed among Hispanic or Black populations** under the same conditions.
++
++3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
++   - Diversity increases linked to **reduced marriage rates**, especially among Whites.
++   - Authors suggest **“erosion of social cohesion and trust”** as mediating factors.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
++1. **Primary Observations:**
++   - Ethnic diversity significantly **reduces total fertility rates**, independent of economic or educational variables.
++   - **Social fragmentation** and perceived dissimilarity drive fertility suppression.
++
++2. **Subgroup Trends:**
++   - White populations respond to diversity with lower family formation.
++   - **Cultural distance** and loss of shared norms are possible causes.
++
++3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
++   - High-diversity metro areas saw steepest declines in White birth rates over the past two decades.
++   - Study challenges mainstream assumptions that diversity has neutral or positive demographic effects.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
++1. **Strengths of the Study:**
++   - Offers **quantitative backing for claims long treated as taboo** in public discourse.
++   - Applies **robust statistical methods** and cross-validates with multiple data sources.
++
++2. **Limitations of the Study:**
++   - Avoids discussing **racial preference, ethnic tension, or cultural conflict** explicitly.
++   - Authors stop short of acknowledging **the demographic replacement implication** of sustained low White fertility.
++
++3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
++   - Include **qualitative data on reasons for delayed or avoided parenthood** among Whites in diverse areas.
++   - Examine **media messaging and policy environments** that could accelerate these trends.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
++- Confirms a **central premise** of the White demographic decline thesis.
++- Demonstrates that **diversity is not neutral** but **functionally suppressive to White reproduction**.
++- Offers solid **empirical support against the utopian assumptions** of multiculturalism.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
++1. Examine **fertility effects of diversity in European countries** experiencing immigration-driven change.
++2. Study **how school demographics and crime perception** affect reproductive decision-making.
++3. Explore **policy frameworks that support demographic stability for founding populations**.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
++[[Download Full Study>>attach:12.Gurun_Solomon_Diversity_BirthRates.pdf]]
++{{/expandable}}
++{{/expandable}}
++
++
  {{expandable summary="Study: The White Man’s Burden: Gonzo Pornography and the Construction of Black Masculinity"}}
  **Source:** *Porn Studies*
  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
@@ -1473,6 +1473,74 @@
  {{/expandable}}
++{{expandable summary="Study: School Choice Is Not Enough: The Impact of Critical Social Justice Ideology in American Education"}}
++**Source:** *Social Science Research Network (SSRN)*
++**Date of Publication:** *2020*
++**Author(s):** *Eric Kaufmann, David Goldberg*
++**Title:** *"School Choice Is Not Enough: The Impact of Critical Social Justice Ideology in American Education"*
++**DOI:** [10.2139/ssrn.3730517](https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3730517)
++**Subject Matter:** *K–12 Education, CRT, Indoctrination, Teacher Training*
++
++{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
++1. **General Observations:**
++   - Surveyed **over 800 educators** and analyzed **curricula, training materials, and administrator communications**.
++   - Found that **CSJ ideology is deeply embedded in public school systems**, including charter and magnet schools.
++
++2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
++   - Teachers reported being trained to believe **Whiteness = privilege + harm**, not just historical context.
++   - Administrators disproportionately **disciplined or suppressed dissenting White teachers or parents**.
++
++3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
++   - **Majority of educators fear retribution** if they question CSJ orthodoxy.
++   - **Curriculum mandates racial self-critique** primarily for White students, often starting in elementary grades.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
++1. **Primary Observations:**
++   - CSJ ideology **functions as an implicit worldview**, not a neutral teaching tool.
++   - “Equity” in practice means **dismantling of perceived White dominance**, often through emotional manipulation of students.
++
++2. **Subgroup Trends:**
++   - White students and teachers report **feeling targeted or dehumanized** in diversity sessions.
++   - Minority students were often **placed in victim-centric identity frameworks**, reinforcing grievance politics.
++
++3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
++   - In several documented districts, **student activities included “unlearning Whiteness” workshops**.
++   - One district mandated that teachers **“de-center White perspectives”** in all classroom subjects.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
++1. **Strengths of the Study:**
++   - One of the few empirical studies documenting **systemic ideological bias in education**.
++   - Strong evidentiary base drawn from **firsthand educator testimony** and training materials.
++
++2. **Limitations of the Study:**
++   - Study is based on **self-reported perceptions**, though many are substantiated with examples.
++   - Focus is primarily U.S.-centric; international parallels not explored.
++
++3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
++   - Future studies could **quantify the academic and emotional impact** on White students.
++   - Comparative analysis with **non-CSJ schools** (e.g., classical models) would clarify causal impact.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
++- Documents how **CRT-aligned ideology disproportionately targets White students and teachers**.
++- Confirms that **school choice fails to protect against ideological indoctrination** when CSJ is systemic.
++- Supports the need for **explicitly anti-indoctrination educational frameworks** grounded in neutrality and merit.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
++1. Investigate **legal protections for students against compelled ideological speech**.
++2. Study **alternatives to CSJ pedagogy**, such as classical liberal education or civic humanism.
++3. Examine **psychological outcomes** of guilt-based racial framing among White children.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
++[[Download Full Study>>attach:11.Goldberg_Kaufmann_CSJ_Education_Impact.pdf]]
++{{/expandable}}
++{{/expandable}}
++
++
  {{expandable summary="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
  **Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
  **Date of Publication:** *2019*