0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 114.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/06/19 03:54
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 115.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/06/19 05:42
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1122,6 +1122,76 @@
1122 1122  
1123 1123  = Whiteness & White Guilt =
1124 1124  
1125 +{{expandable summary="Study: Reducing Implicit Racial Preferences: I. A Comparative Investigation of 17 Interventions"}}
1126 +**Source:** *Psychological Science*
1127 +**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1128 +**Author(s):** *Caleb E. Lai, Anthony G. Greenwald, et al.*
1129 +**Title:** *"Reducing Implicit Racial Preferences: I. A Comparative Investigation of 17 Interventions"*
1130 +**DOI:** [10.1177/0956797614535812](https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614535812)
1131 +**Subject Matter:** *Implicit Bias, Racial Psychology, Psychological Conditioning*
1132 +
1133 +{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1134 +1. **General Observations:**
1135 + - Tested **17 different interventions** across **6,321 participants**, all measured via IAT (Implicit Association Test).
1136 + - Focused exclusively on reducing **pro-White, anti-Black preferences** β€” no reciprocal testing on anti-White bias.
1137 +
1138 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1139 + - Educational and exposure-based interventions (e.g., multiculturalism, egalitarian messaging) failed to reduce bias significantly.
1140 + - Most effective short-term results came from **trauma-based or emotionally coercive interventions**.
1141 +
1142 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1143 + - The **"Black hero" intervention**, where participants imagined being violently attacked by a White man and rescued by a Black man, was among the most effective.
1144 + - Effects of even the most extreme interventions **dissipated within 24–72 hours**, with no long-term behavioral change.
1145 +{{/expandable}}
1146 +
1147 +{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1148 +1. **Primary Observations:**
1149 + - The interventions that produced the most dramatic IAT changes used **emotionally graphic narratives** depicting Whites as violent aggressors and Blacks as saviors.
1150 + - Merely showing positive Black images or promoting egalitarian values had minimal effect on implicit associations.
1151 +
1152 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1153 + - In the **"Black hero" condition**, participants were asked to imagine being physically beaten by a White person and then rescued by a Black person β€” an intentionally vivid and disturbing scenario.
1154 + - The **"Black victim" intervention** relied on emotionally shocking imagery of anti-Black violence (e.g., lynching) to induce guilt and disrupt positive associations with Whiteness.
1155 +
1156 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1157 + - None of the scenarios reversed the framing (e.g., Black aggressor/White victim), confirming the ideological goal was **to degrade White identity**, not merely reduce bias.
1158 + - The study was **cited by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)** to justify DEI-aligned policy recommendations.
1159 +{{/expandable}}
1160 +
1161 +{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1162 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1163 + - Large sample size and systematic comparison across diverse intervention types.
1164 + - Clearly shows that **implicit preference is resilient** and not easily changed by education or exposure alone.
1165 +
1166 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1167 + - The most β€œeffective” methods **relied on emotional manipulation, not persuasion or evidence**.
1168 + - Assumes **natural in-group preference is pathological** when expressed by White subjects but makes no effort to test other groups.
1169 + - **Zero attention to pro-Black or anti-White bias** β€” only White attitudes are pathologized.
1170 +
1171 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1172 + - Test the **psychological harm** and ethical implications of using graphic racial trauma to coerce attitude change.
1173 + - Include interventions that **strengthen ingroup empathy** without demonizing other groups.
1174 + - Disaggregate bias by **class, region, and individual experience**, rather than racially reducing all bias to β€œWhiteness.”
1175 +{{/expandable}}
1176 +
1177 +{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1178 +- Provides direct evidence that **DEI-style implicit bias training** is based on emotionally abusive and **anti-White psychological framing**.
1179 +- Shows how **social science selectively targets Whites for attitude correction**, often using fictionalized racial trauma scenarios.
1180 +- Demonstrates that even extreme interventions **fail to achieve long-term change**, undermining the scientific justification for such policies.
1181 +{{/expandable}}
1182 +
1183 +{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1184 +1. Investigate **implicit bias training outcomes** in real-world institutional settings.
1185 +2. Study **the ethical limits of psychological reprogramming** in DEI policies.
1186 +3. Explore **natural ingroup preference across all races** using morally neutral frameworks.
1187 +{{/expandable}}
1188 +
1189 +{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1190 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:lai2014.pdf]]
1191 +{{/expandable}}
1192 +{{/expandable}}
1193 +
1194 +
1125 1125  {{expandable summary="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1126 1126  **Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1127 1127  **Date of Publication:** *2019*