... |
... |
@@ -1122,6 +1122,76 @@ |
1122 |
1122 |
|
1123 |
1123 |
= Whiteness & White Guilt = |
1124 |
1124 |
|
|
1125 |
+{{expandable summary="Study: Reducing Implicit Racial Preferences: I. A Comparative Investigation of 17 Interventions"}} |
|
1126 |
+**Source:** *Psychological Science* |
|
1127 |
+**Date of Publication:** *2014* |
|
1128 |
+**Author(s):** *Caleb E. Lai, Anthony G. Greenwald, et al.* |
|
1129 |
+**Title:** *"Reducing Implicit Racial Preferences: I. A Comparative Investigation of 17 Interventions"* |
|
1130 |
+**DOI:** [10.1177/0956797614535812](https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614535812) |
|
1131 |
+**Subject Matter:** *Implicit Bias, Racial Psychology, Psychological Conditioning* |
|
1132 |
+ |
|
1133 |
+{{expandable summary="π Key Statistics"}} |
|
1134 |
+1. **General Observations:** |
|
1135 |
+ - Tested **17 different interventions** across **6,321 participants**, all measured via IAT (Implicit Association Test). |
|
1136 |
+ - Focused exclusively on reducing **pro-White, anti-Black preferences** β no reciprocal testing on anti-White bias. |
|
1137 |
+ |
|
1138 |
+2. **Subgroup Analysis:** |
|
1139 |
+ - Educational and exposure-based interventions (e.g., multiculturalism, egalitarian messaging) failed to reduce bias significantly. |
|
1140 |
+ - Most effective short-term results came from **trauma-based or emotionally coercive interventions**. |
|
1141 |
+ |
|
1142 |
+3. **Other Significant Data Points:** |
|
1143 |
+ - The **"Black hero" intervention**, where participants imagined being violently attacked by a White man and rescued by a Black man, was among the most effective. |
|
1144 |
+ - Effects of even the most extreme interventions **dissipated within 24β72 hours**, with no long-term behavioral change. |
|
1145 |
+{{/expandable}} |
|
1146 |
+ |
|
1147 |
+{{expandable summary="π¬ Findings"}} |
|
1148 |
+1. **Primary Observations:** |
|
1149 |
+ - The interventions that produced the most dramatic IAT changes used **emotionally graphic narratives** depicting Whites as violent aggressors and Blacks as saviors. |
|
1150 |
+ - Merely showing positive Black images or promoting egalitarian values had minimal effect on implicit associations. |
|
1151 |
+ |
|
1152 |
+2. **Subgroup Trends:** |
|
1153 |
+ - In the **"Black hero" condition**, participants were asked to imagine being physically beaten by a White person and then rescued by a Black person β an intentionally vivid and disturbing scenario. |
|
1154 |
+ - The **"Black victim" intervention** relied on emotionally shocking imagery of anti-Black violence (e.g., lynching) to induce guilt and disrupt positive associations with Whiteness. |
|
1155 |
+ |
|
1156 |
+3. **Specific Case Analysis:** |
|
1157 |
+ - None of the scenarios reversed the framing (e.g., Black aggressor/White victim), confirming the ideological goal was **to degrade White identity**, not merely reduce bias. |
|
1158 |
+ - The study was **cited by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)** to justify DEI-aligned policy recommendations. |
|
1159 |
+{{/expandable}} |
|
1160 |
+ |
|
1161 |
+{{expandable summary="π Critique & Observations"}} |
|
1162 |
+1. **Strengths of the Study:** |
|
1163 |
+ - Large sample size and systematic comparison across diverse intervention types. |
|
1164 |
+ - Clearly shows that **implicit preference is resilient** and not easily changed by education or exposure alone. |
|
1165 |
+ |
|
1166 |
+2. **Limitations of the Study:** |
|
1167 |
+ - The most βeffectiveβ methods **relied on emotional manipulation, not persuasion or evidence**. |
|
1168 |
+ - Assumes **natural in-group preference is pathological** when expressed by White subjects but makes no effort to test other groups. |
|
1169 |
+ - **Zero attention to pro-Black or anti-White bias** β only White attitudes are pathologized. |
|
1170 |
+ |
|
1171 |
+3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** |
|
1172 |
+ - Test the **psychological harm** and ethical implications of using graphic racial trauma to coerce attitude change. |
|
1173 |
+ - Include interventions that **strengthen ingroup empathy** without demonizing other groups. |
|
1174 |
+ - Disaggregate bias by **class, region, and individual experience**, rather than racially reducing all bias to βWhiteness.β |
|
1175 |
+{{/expandable}} |
|
1176 |
+ |
|
1177 |
+{{expandable summary="π Relevance to Subproject"}} |
|
1178 |
+- Provides direct evidence that **DEI-style implicit bias training** is based on emotionally abusive and **anti-White psychological framing**. |
|
1179 |
+- Shows how **social science selectively targets Whites for attitude correction**, often using fictionalized racial trauma scenarios. |
|
1180 |
+- Demonstrates that even extreme interventions **fail to achieve long-term change**, undermining the scientific justification for such policies. |
|
1181 |
+{{/expandable}} |
|
1182 |
+ |
|
1183 |
+{{expandable summary="π Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} |
|
1184 |
+1. Investigate **implicit bias training outcomes** in real-world institutional settings. |
|
1185 |
+2. Study **the ethical limits of psychological reprogramming** in DEI policies. |
|
1186 |
+3. Explore **natural ingroup preference across all races** using morally neutral frameworks. |
|
1187 |
+{{/expandable}} |
|
1188 |
+ |
|
1189 |
+{{expandable summary="π Download Full Study"}} |
|
1190 |
+[[Download Full Study>>attach:lai2014.pdf]] |
|
1191 |
+{{/expandable}} |
|
1192 |
+{{/expandable}} |
|
1193 |
+ |
|
1194 |
+ |
1125 |
1125 |
{{expandable summary="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}} |
1126 |
1126 |
**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education* |
1127 |
1127 |
**Date of Publication:** *2019* |