0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 99.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/04/16 01:50
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 87.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 07:17
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
2 2  
3 3  
4 4  
5 - Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various important Racial themes. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout. I wanted to make this for a couple of reasons. Number one is organization. There are a ton of useful studies out there that expose the truth, sometimes inadvertently. You'll notice that in this initial draft the summaries are often woke and reflect the bias of the AI writing them as well as the researchers politically correct conclusion in most cases. That's because I haven't gotten to going through and pointing out the reasons I put all of them in here.
5 + Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various important Racial themes. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout. I wanted to make this for a couple of reasons. Number one is organization. There are a ton of useful studies out there that expose the truth, sometimes inadvertently. You'll notice that in this initial draft the summaries are often woke and reflect the bias of the AI writing them as well as the researchers politically correct conclusions in most cases. That's because I haven't gotten to going through and pointing out the reasons I put all of them in here.
6 6  
7 7  
8 8   There is often an underlying hypocrisy or double standard, saying the quiet part out loud, or conclusions that are so much of an antithesis to what the data shows that made me want to include it. At least, thats the idea for once its polished. I have about 150 more studies to upload, so it will be a few weeks before I get through it all. Until such time, feel free to search for them yourself and edit in what you find, or add your own studies. If you like you can do it manually, or if you'd rather go the route I did, just rename the study to its doi number and feed the study into an AI and tell them to summarize the study using the following format:
... ... @@ -110,7 +110,9 @@
110 110  = Genetics =
111 111  
112 112  
113 -{{expandable summary="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
113 +== Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History ==
114 +
115 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
114 114  **Source:** *Nature*
115 115  **Date of Publication:** *2009*
116 116  **Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
... ... @@ -118,7 +118,10 @@
118 118  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
119 119  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
120 120  
121 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
123 +----
124 +
125 +## **Key Statistics**##
126 +
122 122  1. **General Observations:**
123 123   - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
124 124   - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
... ... @@ -130,9 +130,11 @@
130 130  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
131 131   - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
132 132   - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
133 -{{/expandable}}
134 134  
135 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
139 +----
140 +
141 +## **Findings**##
142 +
136 136  1. **Primary Observations:**
137 137   - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
138 138   - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
... ... @@ -144,9 +144,11 @@
144 144  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
145 145   - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
146 146   - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
147 -{{/expandable}}
148 148  
149 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
155 +----
156 +
157 +## **Critique and Observations**##
158 +
150 150  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
151 151   - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
152 152   - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
... ... @@ -158,31 +158,39 @@
158 158  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
159 159   - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
160 160   - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
161 -{{/expandable}}
162 162  
163 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
171 +----
172 +
173 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
164 164  - Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
165 165  - Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
166 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
167 -{{/expandable}}
176 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
168 168  
169 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
178 +----
179 +
180 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
181 +
170 170  1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
171 171  2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
172 172  3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
173 -{{/expandable}}
174 174  
175 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
176 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
177 -##
178 - ##
179 -{{/expandable}}
180 -{{/expandable}}
186 +----
181 181  
182 -{{expandable summary="
188 +## **Summary of Research Study**
189 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
183 183  
191 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
184 184  
185 -Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
193 +----
194 +
195 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
196 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
197 +{{/expand}}
198 +
199 +
200 +== Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations ==
201 +
202 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
186 186  **Source:** *Nature*
187 187  **Date of Publication:** *2016*
188 188  **Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
... ... @@ -190,7 +190,10 @@
190 190  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
191 191  **Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
192 192  
193 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
210 +----
211 +
212 +## **Key Statistics**##
213 +
194 194  1. **General Observations:**
195 195   - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
196 196   - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
... ... @@ -202,9 +202,11 @@
202 202  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
203 203   - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
204 204   - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
205 -{{/expandable}}
206 206  
207 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
226 +----
227 +
228 +## **Findings**##
229 +
208 208  1. **Primary Observations:**
209 209   - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
210 210   - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
... ... @@ -216,9 +216,11 @@
216 216  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
217 217   - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
218 218   - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
219 -{{/expandable}}
220 220  
221 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
242 +----
243 +
244 +## **Critique and Observations**##
245 +
222 222  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
223 223   - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
224 224   - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
... ... @@ -230,39 +230,50 @@
230 230  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
231 231   - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
232 232   - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
233 -{{/expandable}}
234 234  
235 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
258 +----
259 +
260 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
236 236  - Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
237 237  - Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
238 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
239 -{{/expandable}}
263 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
240 240  
241 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
265 +----
266 +
267 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
268 +
242 242  1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
243 243  2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
244 244  3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
245 -{{/expandable}}
246 246  
247 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
248 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
249 -##
250 - ##
251 -{{/expandable}}
252 -{{/expandable}}
273 +----
253 253  
254 -{{expandable summary="
275 +## **Summary of Research Study**
276 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
255 255  
278 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
256 256  
257 -Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
258 -**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
259 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
260 -**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
261 -**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
262 -**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
263 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
280 +----
264 264  
265 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
282 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
283 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
284 +{{/expand}}
285 +
286 +
287 +== Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies ==
288 +
289 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
290 +**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
291 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
292 +**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
293 +**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
294 +**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
295 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
296 +
297 +----
298 +
299 +## **Key Statistics**##
300 +
266 266  1. **General Observations:**
267 267   - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
268 268   - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
... ... @@ -274,9 +274,11 @@
274 274  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
275 275   - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
276 276   - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
277 -{{/expandable}}
278 278  
279 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
313 +----
314 +
315 +## **Findings**##
316 +
280 280  1. **Primary Observations:**
281 281   - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
282 282   - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
... ... @@ -288,9 +288,11 @@
288 288  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
289 289   - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
290 290   - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
291 -{{/expandable}}
292 292  
293 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
329 +----
330 +
331 +## **Critique and Observations**##
332 +
294 294  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
295 295   - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
296 296   - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
... ... @@ -302,29 +302,39 @@
302 302  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
303 303   - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
304 304   - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
305 -{{/expandable}}
306 306  
307 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
345 +----
346 +
347 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
308 308  - Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
309 309  - Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
310 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
311 -{{/expandable}}
350 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
312 312  
313 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
352 +----
353 +
354 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
355 +
314 314  1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
315 315  2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
316 316  3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
317 -{{/expandable}}
318 318  
319 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
320 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
321 -{{/expandable}}
322 -{{/expandable}}
360 +----
323 323  
324 -{{expandable summary="
362 +## **Summary of Research Study**
363 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
325 325  
365 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
326 326  
327 -Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
367 +----
368 +
369 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
370 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
371 +{{/expand}}
372 +
373 +
374 +== Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease ==
375 +
376 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
328 328  **Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
329 329  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
330 330  **Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
... ... @@ -332,7 +332,10 @@
332 332  **DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
333 333  **Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
334 334  
335 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
384 +----
385 +
386 +## **Key Statistics**##
387 +
336 336  1. **General Observations:**
337 337   - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
338 338   - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
... ... @@ -344,9 +344,11 @@
344 344  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
345 345   - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
346 346   - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
347 -{{/expandable}}
348 348  
349 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
400 +----
401 +
402 +## **Findings**##
403 +
350 350  1. **Primary Observations:**
351 351   - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
352 352   - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
... ... @@ -358,9 +358,11 @@
358 358  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
359 359   - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
360 360   - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
361 -{{/expandable}}
362 362  
363 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
416 +----
417 +
418 +## **Critique and Observations**##
419 +
364 364  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
365 365   - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
366 366   - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
... ... @@ -372,37 +372,50 @@
372 372  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
373 373   - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
374 374   - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
375 -{{/expandable}}
376 376  
377 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
432 +----
433 +
434 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
378 378  - Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
379 379  - Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
380 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
381 -{{/expandable}}
437 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
382 382  
383 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
439 +----
440 +
441 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
442 +
384 384  1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
385 385  2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
386 386  3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
387 -{{/expandable}}
388 388  
389 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
390 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
391 -{{/expandable}}
392 -{{/expandable}}
447 +----
393 393  
394 -{{expandable summary="
449 +## **Summary of Research Study**
450 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
395 395  
452 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
396 396  
397 -Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
398 -**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
399 -**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
400 -**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
401 -**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
402 -**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
403 -**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*
454 +----
404 404  
405 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
456 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
457 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
458 +{{/expand}}
459 +
460 +
461 +== Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA ==
462 +
463 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
464 +**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
465 +**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
466 +**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
467 +**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
468 +**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
469 +**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
470 +
471 +----
472 +
473 +## **Key Statistics**##
474 +
406 406  1. **General Observations:**
407 407   - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
408 408   - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
... ... @@ -414,9 +414,11 @@
414 414  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
415 415   - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
416 416   - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
417 -{{/expandable}}
418 418  
419 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
487 +----
488 +
489 +## **Findings**##
490 +
420 420  1. **Primary Observations:**
421 421   - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
422 422   - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
... ... @@ -429,9 +429,11 @@
429 429   - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
430 430   - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
431 431   - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
432 -{{/expandable}}
433 433  
434 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
504 +----
505 +
506 +## **Critique and Observations**##
507 +
435 435  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
436 436   - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
437 437   - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
... ... @@ -443,37 +443,48 @@
443 443  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
444 444   - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
445 445   - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
446 -{{/expandable}}
447 447  
448 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
520 +----
521 +
522 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
449 449  - Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
450 450  - Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
451 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.
452 -{{/expandable}}
525 +- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
453 453  
454 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
527 +----
528 +
529 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
530 +
455 455  1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
456 456  2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
457 457  3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
458 -{{/expandable}}
459 459  
460 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
461 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]
462 -{{/expandable}}
463 -{{/expandable}}
535 +----
464 464  
465 -{{expandable summary="
537 +## **Summary of Research Study**
538 +This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
466 466  
540 +----
467 467  
468 -Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
469 -**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
470 -**Date of Publication:** *2013*
471 -**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
472 -**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
473 -**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
474 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
542 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
543 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
544 +{{/expand}}
475 475  
476 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
546 +
547 +== Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age ==
548 +
549 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
550 +**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
551 +**Date of Publication:** *2013*
552 +**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
553 +**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
554 +**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
555 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
556 +
557 +----
558 +
559 +## **Key Statistics**##
560 +
477 477  1. **General Observations:**
478 478   - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
479 479   - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
... ... @@ -485,9 +485,11 @@
485 485  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
486 486   - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
487 487   - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
488 -{{/expandable}}
489 489  
490 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
573 +----
574 +
575 +## **Findings**##
576 +
491 491  1. **Primary Observations:**
492 492   - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
493 493   - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
... ... @@ -499,9 +499,11 @@
499 499  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
500 500   - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
501 501   - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
502 -{{/expandable}}
503 503  
504 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
589 +----
590 +
591 +## **Critique and Observations**##
592 +
505 505  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
506 506   - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
507 507   - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
... ... @@ -513,37 +513,50 @@
513 513  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
514 514   - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
515 515   - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
516 -{{/expandable}}
517 517  
518 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
605 +----
606 +
607 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
519 519  - Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
520 520  - Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
521 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
522 -{{/expandable}}
610 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
523 523  
524 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
612 +----
613 +
614 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
615 +
525 525  1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
526 526  2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
527 527  3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
528 -{{/expandable}}
529 529  
530 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
531 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
532 -{{/expandable}}
533 -{{/expandable}}
620 +----
534 534  
535 -{{expandable summary="
622 +## **Summary of Research Study**
623 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
536 536  
625 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
537 537  
538 -Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
539 -**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
540 -**Date of Publication:** *2010*
541 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
542 -**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
543 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
544 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
627 +----
545 545  
546 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
629 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
630 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
631 +{{/expand}}
632 +
633 +
634 +== Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications ==
635 +
636 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
637 +**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
638 +**Date of Publication:** *2010*
639 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
640 +**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
641 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
642 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
643 +
644 +----
645 +
646 +## **Key Statistics**##
647 +
547 547  1. **General Observations:**
548 548   - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
549 549   - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
... ... @@ -555,9 +555,11 @@
555 555  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
556 556   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
557 557   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
558 -{{/expandable}}
559 559  
560 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
660 +----
661 +
662 +## **Findings**##
663 +
561 561  1. **Primary Observations:**
562 562   - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
563 563   - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
... ... @@ -569,9 +569,11 @@
569 569  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
570 570   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
571 571   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
572 -{{/expandable}}
573 573  
574 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
676 +----
677 +
678 +## **Critique and Observations**##
679 +
575 575  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
576 576   - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
577 577   - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
... ... @@ -583,36 +583,50 @@
583 583  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
584 584   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
585 585   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
586 -{{/expandable}}
587 587  
588 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
692 +----
693 +
694 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
589 589  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
590 590  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
591 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
592 -{{/expandable}}
697 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
593 593  
594 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
699 +----
700 +
701 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
702 +
595 595  1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
596 596  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
597 597  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
598 -{{/expandable}}
599 599  
600 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
601 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
602 -{{/expandable}}
603 -{{/expandable}}
707 +----
604 604  
605 -= IQ =
709 +## **Summary of Research Study**
710 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
606 606  
607 -{{expandable summary="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
608 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
609 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
610 -**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
611 -**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
612 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
613 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
712 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
614 614  
615 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
714 +----
715 +
716 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
717 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
718 +{{/expand}}
719 +
720 +
721 +== Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media ==
722 +
723 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
724 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
725 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
726 +**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
727 +**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
728 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
729 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
730 +
731 +----
732 +
733 +## **Key Statistics**##
734 +
616 616  1. **General Observations:**
617 617   - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
618 618   - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
... ... @@ -624,9 +624,11 @@
624 624  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
625 625   - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
626 626   - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
627 -{{/expandable}}
628 628  
629 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
747 +----
748 +
749 +## **Findings**##
750 +
630 630  1. **Primary Observations:**
631 631   - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
632 632   - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
... ... @@ -638,9 +638,11 @@
638 638  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
639 639   - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
640 640   - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
641 -{{/expandable}}
642 642  
643 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
763 +----
764 +
765 +## **Critique and Observations**##
766 +
644 644  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
645 645   - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
646 646   - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
... ... @@ -652,34 +652,50 @@
652 652  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
653 653   - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
654 654   - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
655 -{{/expandable}}
656 656  
657 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
779 +----
780 +
781 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
658 658  - Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
659 659  - Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
660 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
661 -{{/expandable}}
784 +- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
662 662  
663 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
786 +----
787 +
788 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
789 +
664 664  1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
665 665  2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
666 666  3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
667 -{{/expandable}}
668 668  
669 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
670 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
671 -{{/expandable}}
672 -{{/expandable}}
794 +----
673 673  
674 -{{expandable summary="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
675 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
676 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
677 -**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
678 -**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
679 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
680 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
796 +## **Summary of Research Study**
797 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
681 681  
682 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
799 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
800 +
801 +----
802 +
803 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
804 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
805 +{{/expand}}
806 +
807 +
808 +== Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation ==
809 +
810 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
811 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
812 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
813 +**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
814 +**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
815 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
816 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
817 +
818 +----
819 +
820 +## **Key Statistics**##
821 +
683 683  1. **General Observations:**
684 684   - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
685 685   - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
... ... @@ -691,9 +691,11 @@
691 691  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
692 692   - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
693 693   - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
694 -{{/expandable}}
695 695  
696 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
834 +----
835 +
836 +## **Findings**##
837 +
697 697  1. **Primary Observations:**
698 698   - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
699 699   - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
... ... @@ -705,9 +705,11 @@
705 705  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
706 706   - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
707 707   - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
708 -{{/expandable}}
709 709  
710 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
850 +----
851 +
852 +## **Critique and Observations**##
853 +
711 711  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
712 712   - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
713 713   - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
... ... @@ -719,37 +719,78 @@
719 719  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
720 720   - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
721 721   - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
722 -{{/expandable}}
723 723  
724 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
866 +----
867 +
868 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
725 725  - Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
726 726  - Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
727 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
728 -{{/expandable}}
871 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
729 729  
730 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
873 +----
874 +
875 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
876 +
731 731  1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
732 732  2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
733 733  3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
734 -{{/expandable}}
735 735  
736 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
737 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
738 -{{/expandable}}
739 -{{/expandable}}
881 +----
740 740  
741 -{{expandable summary="Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding"}}
742 -**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
743 -**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
744 -**Author(s):** Smith et al.
745 -**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
746 -**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
747 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
748 -{{/expandable}}
883 +## **Summary of Research Study**
884 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.  ##
749 749  
750 -= Dating =
886 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
751 751  
752 -{{expandable summary="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
888 +----
889 +
890 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
891 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
892 +{{/expand}}
893 +
894 +
895 +== Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding ==
896 +
897 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
898 +**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
899 +**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
900 +**Author(s):** Smith et al.
901 +**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
902 +**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
903 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science 
904 +
905 +**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
906 +
907 + **Key Statistics**
908 +
909 +1. **General Observations:**
910 + - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
911 + - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
912 +
913 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
914 + - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
915 + - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
916 +
917 + **Findings**
918 +
919 +- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
920 +- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
921 +
922 + **Relevance to Subproject**
923 +
924 +- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
925 +- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
926 +{{/expand}}
927 +
928 +
929 +----
930 +
931 += Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
932 +
933 +
934 +== Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018 ==
935 +
936 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
753 753  **Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
754 754  **Date of Publication:** *2020*
755 755  **Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
... ... @@ -757,7 +757,10 @@
757 757  **DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
758 758  **Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
759 759  
760 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
944 +----
945 +
946 +## **Key Statistics**##
947 +
761 761  1. **General Observations:**
762 762   - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
763 763   - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
... ... @@ -769,9 +769,11 @@
769 769  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
770 770   - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
771 771   - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
772 -{{/expandable}}
773 773  
774 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
960 +----
961 +
962 +## **Findings**##
963 +
775 775  1. **Primary Observations:**
776 776   - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
777 777   - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
... ... @@ -783,9 +783,11 @@
783 783  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
784 784   - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
785 785   - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
786 -{{/expandable}}
787 787  
788 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
976 +----
977 +
978 +## **Critique and Observations**##
979 +
789 789  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
790 790   - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
791 791   - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
... ... @@ -797,32 +797,55 @@
797 797  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
798 798   - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
799 799   - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
800 -{{/expandable}}
801 801  
802 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
992 +----
993 +
994 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
803 803  - Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
804 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
805 -{{/expandable}}
996 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
806 806  
807 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
998 +----
999 +
1000 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1001 +
808 808  1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
809 809  2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
810 -{{/expandable}}
811 811  
812 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1005 +----
813 813  
814 -{{/expandable}}
815 -{{/expandable}}
1007 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1008 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.  ##
816 816  
817 -{{expandable summary="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
818 -**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
819 -**Date of Publication:** *2012*
820 -**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
821 -**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
822 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
823 -**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*
1010 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
824 824  
825 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1012 +----
1013 +
1014 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1015 +{{velocity}}
1016 +#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
1017 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
1018 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
1019 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
1020 +#else
1021 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
1022 +#end {{/velocity}}##
1023 +{{/expand}}
1024 +
1025 +
1026 +== Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ==
1027 +
1028 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
1029 +**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
1030 +**Date of Publication:** *2012*
1031 +**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
1032 +**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
1033 +**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
1034 +**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
1035 +
1036 +----
1037 +
1038 +## **Key Statistics**##
1039 +
826 826  1. **General Observations:**
827 827   - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
828 828   - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
... ... @@ -836,9 +836,11 @@
836 836   - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
837 837   - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
838 838   - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
839 -{{/expandable}}
840 840  
841 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1054 +----
1055 +
1056 +## **Findings**##
1057 +
842 842  1. **Primary Observations:**
843 843   - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
844 844   - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
... ... @@ -850,9 +850,11 @@
850 850  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
851 851   - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
852 852   - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
853 -{{/expandable}}
854 854  
855 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1070 +----
1071 +
1072 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1073 +
856 856  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
857 857   - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
858 858   - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
... ... @@ -864,29 +864,37 @@
864 864  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
865 865   - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
866 866   - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
867 -{{/expandable}}
868 868  
869 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1086 +----
1087 +
1088 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
870 870  - Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
871 871  - Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
872 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.
873 -{{/expandable}}
1091 +- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
874 874  
875 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1093 +----
1094 +
1095 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1096 +
876 876  1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
877 877  2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
878 878  3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
879 -{{/expandable}}
880 880  
881 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
882 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]
883 -{{/expandable}}
884 -{{/expandable}}
1101 +----
885 885  
886 -{{expandable summary="
1103 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1104 +This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
887 887  
1106 +----
888 888  
889 -Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
1108 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1109 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
1110 +{{/expand}}
1111 +
1112 +
1113 +== Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness ==
1114 +
1115 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
890 890  **Source:** *Current Psychology*
891 891  **Date of Publication:** *2024*
892 892  **Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
... ... @@ -894,7 +894,10 @@
894 894  **DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
895 895  **Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
896 896  
897 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1123 +----
1124 +
1125 +## **Key Statistics**##
1126 +
898 898  1. **General Observations:**
899 899   - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
900 900   - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
... ... @@ -906,9 +906,11 @@
906 906  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
907 907   - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
908 908   - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
909 -{{/expandable}}
910 910  
911 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1139 +----
1140 +
1141 +## **Findings**##
1142 +
912 912  1. **Primary Observations:**
913 913   - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
914 914   - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
... ... @@ -920,9 +920,11 @@
920 920  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
921 921   - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
922 922   - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
923 -{{/expandable}}
924 924  
925 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1155 +----
1156 +
1157 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1158 +
926 926  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
927 927   - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
928 928   - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
... ... @@ -934,37 +934,53 @@
934 934  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
935 935   - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
936 936   - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
937 -{{/expandable}}
938 938  
939 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1171 +----
1172 +
1173 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
940 940  - Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
941 941  - Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
942 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
943 -{{/expandable}}
1176 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
944 944  
945 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1178 +----
1179 +
1180 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1181 +
946 946  1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
947 947  2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
948 948  3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
949 -{{/expandable}}
950 950  
951 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
952 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
953 -{{/expandable}}
1186 +----
954 954  
1188 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1189 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
1190 +
1191 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1192 +
1193 +----
1194 +
1195 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1196 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
1197 +{{/expand}}
1198 +
1199 +
955 955  = Crime and Substance Abuse =
956 956  
957 -{{/expandable}}
958 958  
959 -{{expandable summary="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
960 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
961 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
962 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
963 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
964 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
965 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1203 +== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
966 966  
967 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1205 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1206 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1207 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1208 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1209 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1210 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1211 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1212 +
1213 +----
1214 +
1215 +## **Key Statistics**##
1216 +
968 968  1. **General Observations:**
969 969   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
970 970   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -976,9 +976,11 @@
976 976  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
977 977   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
978 978   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
979 -{{/expandable}}
980 980  
981 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1229 +----
1230 +
1231 +## **Findings**##
1232 +
982 982  1. **Primary Observations:**
983 983   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
984 984   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -990,9 +990,11 @@
990 990  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
991 991   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
992 992   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
993 -{{/expandable}}
994 994  
995 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1245 +----
1246 +
1247 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1248 +
996 996  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
997 997   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
998 998   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1004,29 +1004,39 @@
1004 1004  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1005 1005   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1006 1006   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1007 -{{/expandable}}
1008 1008  
1009 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1261 +----
1262 +
1263 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1010 1010  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1011 1011  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1012 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1013 -{{/expandable}}
1266 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1014 1014  
1015 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1268 +----
1269 +
1270 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1271 +
1016 1016  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1017 1017  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1018 1018  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1019 -{{/expandable}}
1020 1020  
1021 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1022 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1023 -{{/expandable}}
1024 -{{/expandable}}
1276 +----
1025 1025  
1026 -{{expandable summary="
1278 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1279 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1027 1027  
1281 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1028 1028  
1029 -Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1283 +----
1284 +
1285 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1286 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1287 +{{/expand}}
1288 +
1289 +
1290 +== Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1291 +
1292 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1030 1030  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1031 1031  **Date of Publication:** *2003*
1032 1032  **Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
... ... @@ -1034,7 +1034,10 @@
1034 1034  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1035 1035  **Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1036 1036  
1037 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1300 +----
1301 +
1302 +## **Key Statistics**##
1303 +
1038 1038  1. **General Observations:**
1039 1039   - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1040 1040   - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
... ... @@ -1046,62 +1046,82 @@
1046 1046  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1047 1047   - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1048 1048   - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1049 -{{/expandable}}
1050 1050  
1051 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1316 +----
1317 +
1318 +## **Findings**##
1319 +
1052 1052  1. **Primary Observations:**
1053 1053   - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1054 1054   - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1055 1055  
1056 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1324 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1057 1057   - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1058 1058   - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1059 1059  
1060 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1328 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1061 1061   - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1062 1062   - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1063 -{{/expandable}}
1064 1064  
1065 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1066 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1332 +----
1333 +
1334 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1335 +
1336 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1067 1067   - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1068 1068   - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1069 1069  
1070 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1340 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1071 1071   - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1072 1072   - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1073 1073  
1074 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1344 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1075 1075   - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1076 1076   - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1077 -{{/expandable}}
1078 1078  
1079 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1348 +----
1349 +
1350 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1080 1080  - Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1081 1081  - Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1082 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1083 -{{/expandable}}
1353 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1084 1084  
1085 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1355 +----
1356 +
1357 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1358 +
1086 1086  1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1087 1087  2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1088 1088  3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1089 -{{/expandable}}
1090 1090  
1091 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1092 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1093 -{{/expandable}}
1094 -{{/expandable}}
1363 +----
1095 1095  
1096 -{{expandable summary="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1097 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1098 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1099 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1100 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1101 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1102 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1365 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1366 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
1103 1103  
1104 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1368 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1369 +
1370 +----
1371 +
1372 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1373 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
1374 +{{/expand}}
1375 +
1376 +
1377 +== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1378 +
1379 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1380 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1381 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1382 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1383 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1384 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1385 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1386 +
1387 +----
1388 +
1389 +## **Key Statistics**##
1390 +
1105 1105  1. **General Observations:**
1106 1106   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1107 1107   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -1113,9 +1113,11 @@
1113 1113  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1114 1114   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1115 1115   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1116 -{{/expandable}}
1117 1117  
1118 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1403 +----
1404 +
1405 +## **Findings**##
1406 +
1119 1119  1. **Primary Observations:**
1120 1120   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1121 1121   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -1127,9 +1127,11 @@
1127 1127  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1128 1128   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1129 1129   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1130 -{{/expandable}}
1131 1131  
1132 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1419 +----
1420 +
1421 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1422 +
1133 1133  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1134 1134   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1135 1135   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1141,38 +1141,117 @@
1141 1141  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1142 1142   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1143 1143   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1144 -{{/expandable}}
1145 1145  
1146 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1435 +----
1436 +
1437 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1147 1147  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1148 1148  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1149 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1150 -{{/expandable}}
1440 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1151 1151  
1152 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1442 +----
1443 +
1444 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1445 +
1153 1153  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1154 1154  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1155 1155  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1156 -{{/expandable}}
1157 1157  
1158 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1159 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1160 -{{/expandable}}
1161 -{{/expandable}}
1450 +----
1162 1162  
1163 -{{expandable summary="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1452 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1453 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1164 1164  
1165 -{{/expandable}}
1455 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1166 1166  
1167 -{{expandable summary="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1168 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1169 -**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1170 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1171 -**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1172 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1173 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
1457 +----
1174 1174  
1175 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1459 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1460 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1461 +{{/expand}}
1462 +
1463 +
1464 +== Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults ==
1465 +
1466 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1467 + Source: Addictive Behaviors
1468 +Date of Publication: 2016
1469 +Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
1470 +Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
1471 +DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
1472 +Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
1473 +
1474 +Key Statistics
1475 +General Observations:
1476 +
1477 +Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
1478 +Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
1479 +Subgroup Analysis:
1480 +
1481 +Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
1482 +Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
1483 +Other Significant Data Points:
1484 +
1485 +Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
1486 +Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
1487 +Findings
1488 +Primary Observations:
1489 +
1490 +Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
1491 +Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
1492 +Subgroup Trends:
1493 +
1494 +Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
1495 +College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
1496 +Specific Case Analysis:
1497 +
1498 +Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
1499 +Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
1500 +Critique and Observations
1501 +Strengths of the Study:
1502 +
1503 +Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
1504 +Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
1505 +Limitations of the Study:
1506 +
1507 +Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
1508 +Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
1509 +Suggestions for Improvement:
1510 +
1511 +Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
1512 +Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
1513 +Relevance to Subproject
1514 +Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
1515 +Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
1516 +Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
1517 +Suggestions for Further Exploration
1518 +Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
1519 +Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
1520 +Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
1521 +Summary of Research Study
1522 +This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
1523 +
1524 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1525 +
1526 +📄 Download Full Study
1527 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
1528 +{{/expand}}
1529 +
1530 +
1531 +== Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time? ==
1532 +
1533 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1534 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1535 +**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1536 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1537 +**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1538 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1539 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1540 +
1541 +----
1542 +
1543 +## **Key Statistics**##
1544 +
1176 1176  1. **General Observations:**
1177 1177   - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1178 1178   - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
... ... @@ -1184,9 +1184,11 @@
1184 1184  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1185 1185   - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1186 1186   - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1187 -{{/expandable}}
1188 1188  
1189 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1557 +----
1558 +
1559 +## **Findings**##
1560 +
1190 1190  1. **Primary Observations:**
1191 1191   - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1192 1192   - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
... ... @@ -1198,9 +1198,11 @@
1198 1198  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1199 1199   - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1200 1200   - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1201 -{{/expandable}}
1202 1202  
1203 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1573 +----
1574 +
1575 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1576 +
1204 1204  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1205 1205   - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1206 1206   - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
... ... @@ -1212,37 +1212,52 @@
1212 1212  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1213 1213   - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1214 1214   - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1215 -{{/expandable}}
1216 1216  
1217 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1589 +----
1590 +
1591 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1218 1218  - Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1219 1219  - Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1220 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
1221 -{{/expandable}}
1594 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1222 1222  
1223 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1596 +----
1597 +
1598 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1599 +
1224 1224  1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1225 1225  2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1226 1226  3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1227 -{{/expandable}}
1228 1228  
1229 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1230 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
1231 -{{/expandable}}
1604 +----
1232 1232  
1606 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1607 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.  ##
1608 +
1609 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1610 +
1611 +----
1612 +
1613 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1614 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
1615 +{{/expand}}
1616 +
1617 +
1233 1233  = Whiteness & White Guilt =
1234 1234  
1235 -{{/expandable}}
1620 +== Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports ==
1236 1236  
1237 -{{expandable summary="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1238 -**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1239 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1240 -**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1241 -**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1242 -**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1243 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
1622 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1623 +**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1624 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1625 +**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1626 +**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1627 +**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1628 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1244 1244  
1245 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1630 +----
1631 +
1632 +## **Key Statistics**##
1633 +
1246 1246  1. **General Observations:**
1247 1247   - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1248 1248   - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
... ... @@ -1254,9 +1254,11 @@
1254 1254  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1255 1255   - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1256 1256   - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1257 -{{/expandable}}
1258 1258  
1259 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1646 +----
1647 +
1648 +## **Findings**##
1649 +
1260 1260  1. **Primary Observations:**
1261 1261   - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1262 1262   - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
... ... @@ -1268,9 +1268,11 @@
1268 1268  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1269 1269   - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1270 1270   - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1271 -{{/expandable}}
1272 1272  
1273 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1662 +----
1663 +
1664 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1665 +
1274 1274  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1275 1275   - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1276 1276   - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
... ... @@ -1282,34 +1282,50 @@
1282 1282  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1283 1283   - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1284 1284   - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1285 -{{/expandable}}
1286 1286  
1287 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1678 +----
1679 +
1680 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1288 1288  - Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1289 1289  - Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1290 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
1291 -{{/expandable}}
1683 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1292 1292  
1293 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1685 +----
1686 +
1687 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1688 +
1294 1294  1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1295 1295  2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1296 1296  3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1297 -{{/expandable}}
1298 1298  
1299 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1300 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
1301 -{{/expandable}}
1302 -{{/expandable}}
1693 +----
1303 1303  
1304 -{{expandable summary="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1305 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1306 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1307 -**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1695 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1696 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
1697 +
1698 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1699 +
1700 +----
1701 +
1702 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1703 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
1704 +{{/expand}}
1705 +
1706 +
1707 +== Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations ==
1708 +
1709 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1710 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1711 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1712 +**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1308 1308  **Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1309 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1310 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1714 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1715 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1311 1311  
1312 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1717 +----
1718 +
1719 +## **Key Statistics**##
1720 +
1313 1313  1. **General Observations:**
1314 1314   - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1315 1315   - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
... ... @@ -1321,9 +1321,11 @@
1321 1321  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1322 1322   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1323 1323   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1324 -{{/expandable}}
1325 1325  
1326 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1733 +----
1734 +
1735 +## **Findings**##
1736 +
1327 1327  1. **Primary Observations:**
1328 1328   - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1329 1329   - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
... ... @@ -1335,9 +1335,11 @@
1335 1335  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1336 1336   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1337 1337   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1338 -{{/expandable}}
1339 1339  
1340 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1749 +----
1750 +
1751 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1752 +
1341 1341  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1342 1342   - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1343 1343   - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
... ... @@ -1349,26 +1349,39 @@
1349 1349  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1350 1350   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1351 1351   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1352 -{{/expandable}}
1353 1353  
1354 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1765 +----
1766 +
1767 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1355 1355  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1356 1356  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1357 -- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1358 -{{/expandable}}
1770 +- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1359 1359  
1360 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1772 +----
1773 +
1774 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1775 +
1361 1361  1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1362 1362  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1363 1363  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1364 -{{/expandable}}
1365 1365  
1366 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1367 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1368 -{{/expandable}}
1369 -{{/expandable}}
1780 +----
1370 1370  
1371 -{{expandable summary="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1782 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1783 +This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
1784 +
1785 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1786 +
1787 +----
1788 +
1789 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1790 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
1791 +{{/expand}}
1792 +
1793 +
1794 +== Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans ==
1795 +
1796 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1372 1372  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1373 1373  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
1374 1374  **Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
... ... @@ -1376,7 +1376,10 @@
1376 1376  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1377 1377  **Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1378 1378  
1379 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1804 +----
1805 +
1806 +## **Key Statistics**##
1807 +
1380 1380  1. **General Observations:**
1381 1381   - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1382 1382   - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
... ... @@ -1388,9 +1388,11 @@
1388 1388  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1389 1389   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1390 1390   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1391 -{{/expandable}}
1392 1392  
1393 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1820 +----
1821 +
1822 +## **Findings**##
1823 +
1394 1394  1. **Primary Observations:**
1395 1395   - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1396 1396   - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
... ... @@ -1402,9 +1402,11 @@
1402 1402  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1403 1403   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1404 1404   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1405 -{{/expandable}}
1406 1406  
1407 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1836 +----
1837 +
1838 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1839 +
1408 1408  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1409 1409   - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1410 1410   - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
... ... @@ -1416,34 +1416,50 @@
1416 1416  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1417 1417   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1418 1418   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1419 -{{/expandable}}
1420 1420  
1421 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1852 +----
1853 +
1854 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1422 1422  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1423 1423  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1424 -- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1425 -{{/expandable}}
1857 +- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1426 1426  
1427 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1859 +----
1860 +
1861 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1862 +
1428 1428  1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1429 1429  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1430 1430  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1431 -{{/expandable}}
1432 1432  
1433 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1434 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1435 -{{/expandable}}
1436 -{{/expandable}}
1867 +----
1437 1437  
1438 -{{expandable summary="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1439 -**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1440 -**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1441 -**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1442 -**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1443 -**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1444 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1869 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1870 +This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
1445 1445  
1446 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1872 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1873 +
1874 +----
1875 +
1876 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1877 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
1878 +{{/expand}}
1879 +
1880 +
1881 +== Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities? ==
1882 +
1883 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1884 +**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1885 +**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1886 +**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1887 +**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1888 +**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1889 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1890 +
1891 +----
1892 +
1893 +## **Key Statistics**##
1894 +
1447 1447  1. **General Observations:**
1448 1448   - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1449 1449   - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
... ... @@ -1455,9 +1455,11 @@
1455 1455  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1456 1456   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1457 1457   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1458 -{{/expandable}}
1459 1459  
1460 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1907 +----
1908 +
1909 +## **Findings**##
1910 +
1461 1461  1. **Primary Observations:**
1462 1462   - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1463 1463   - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
... ... @@ -1469,9 +1469,11 @@
1469 1469  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1470 1470   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1471 1471   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1472 -{{/expandable}}
1473 1473  
1474 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1923 +----
1924 +
1925 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1926 +
1475 1475  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1476 1476   - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1477 1477   - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
... ... @@ -1483,37 +1483,53 @@
1483 1483  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1484 1484   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1485 1485   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1486 -{{/expandable}}
1487 1487  
1488 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1939 +----
1940 +
1941 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1489 1489  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1490 1490  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1491 -- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1492 -{{/expandable}}
1944 +- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
1493 1493  
1494 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1946 +----
1947 +
1948 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1949 +
1495 1495  1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1496 1496  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1497 1497  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1498 -{{/expandable}}
1499 1499  
1500 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1501 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1502 -{{/expandable}}
1954 +----
1503 1503  
1956 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1957 +This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
1958 +
1959 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1960 +
1961 +----
1962 +
1963 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1964 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
1965 +{{/expand}}
1966 +
1967 +
1504 1504  = Media =
1505 1505  
1506 -{{/expandable}}
1507 1507  
1508 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic"}}
1509 -**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1510 -**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1511 -**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1512 -**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1513 -**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1514 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*
1971 +== Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic ==
1515 1515  
1516 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1973 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"}}
1974 +**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1975 +**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1976 +**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1977 +**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1978 +**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1979 +**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1980 +
1981 +----
1982 +
1983 +## **Key Statistics**##
1984 +
1517 1517  1. **General Observations:**
1518 1518   - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1519 1519   - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
... ... @@ -1525,9 +1525,11 @@
1525 1525  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1526 1526   - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1527 1527   - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1528 -{{/expandable}}
1529 1529  
1530 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1997 +----
1998 +
1999 +## **Findings**##
2000 +
1531 1531  1. **Primary Observations:**
1532 1532   - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1533 1533   - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
... ... @@ -1539,9 +1539,11 @@
1539 1539  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1540 1540   - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1541 1541   - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1542 -{{/expandable}}
1543 1543  
1544 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
2013 +----
2014 +
2015 +## **Critique and Observations**##
2016 +
1545 1545  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1546 1546   - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1547 1547   - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
... ... @@ -1553,34 +1553,48 @@
1553 1553  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1554 1554   - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1555 1555   - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1556 -{{/expandable}}
1557 1557  
1558 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
2029 +----
2030 +
2031 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1559 1559  - Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
1560 1560  - Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1561 -- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
1562 -{{/expandable}}
2034 +- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
1563 1563  
1564 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
2036 +----
2037 +
2038 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2039 +
1565 1565  1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
1566 1566  2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1567 1567  3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1568 -{{/expandable}}
1569 1569  
1570 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1571 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
1572 -{{/expandable}}
1573 -{{/expandable}}
2044 +----
1574 1574  
1575 -{{expandable summary="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
1576 -**Source:** *Politics & Policy*
1577 -**Date of Publication:** *2007*
1578 -**Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
1579 -**Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
1580 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
1581 -**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*
2046 +## **Summary of Research Study**
2047 +This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
1582 1582  
1583 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
2049 +----
2050 +
2051 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
2052 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
2053 +{{/expand}}
2054 +
2055 +
2056 +== Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions ==
2057 +
2058 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
2059 +**Source:** *Politics & Policy*
2060 +**Date of Publication:** *2007*
2061 +**Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
2062 +**Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
2063 +**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
2064 +**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
2065 +
2066 +----
2067 +
2068 +## **Key Statistics**##
2069 +
1584 1584  1. **General Observations:**
1585 1585   - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
1586 1586   - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
... ... @@ -1592,9 +1592,11 @@
1592 1592  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1593 1593   - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
1594 1594   - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
1595 -{{/expandable}}
1596 1596  
1597 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
2082 +----
2083 +
2084 +## **Findings**##
2085 +
1598 1598  1. **Primary Observations:**
1599 1599   - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
1600 1600   - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
... ... @@ -1606,9 +1606,11 @@
1606 1606  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1607 1607   - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
1608 1608   - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
1609 -{{/expandable}}
1610 1610  
1611 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
2098 +----
2099 +
2100 +## **Critique and Observations**##
2101 +
1612 1612  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1613 1613   - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
1614 1614   - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
... ... @@ -1620,34 +1620,48 @@
1620 1620  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1621 1621   - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
1622 1622   - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
1623 -{{/expandable}}
1624 1624  
1625 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
2114 +----
2115 +
2116 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1626 1626  - Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
1627 1627  - Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
1628 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.
1629 -{{/expandable}}
2119 +- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
1630 1630  
1631 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
2121 +----
2122 +
2123 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2124 +
1632 1632  1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
1633 1633  2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
1634 1634  3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
1635 -{{/expandable}}
1636 1636  
1637 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1638 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]
1639 -{{/expandable}}
1640 -{{/expandable}}
2129 +----
1641 1641  
1642 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
1643 -**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
1644 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1645 -**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
1646 -**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
1647 -**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
1648 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*
2131 +## **Summary of Research Study**
2132 +This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
1649 1649  
1650 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
2134 +----
2135 +
2136 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
2137 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
2138 +{{/expand}}
2139 +
2140 +
2141 +== Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion ==
2142 +
2143 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
2144 +**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
2145 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
2146 +**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
2147 +**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
2148 +**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2149 +**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
2150 +
2151 +----
2152 +
2153 +## **Key Statistics**##
2154 +
1651 1651  1. **General Observations:**
1652 1652   - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
1653 1653   - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
... ... @@ -1659,9 +1659,11 @@
1659 1659  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1660 1660   - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
1661 1661   - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
1662 -{{/expandable}}
1663 1663  
1664 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
2167 +----
2168 +
2169 +## **Findings**##
2170 +
1665 1665  1. **Primary Observations:**
1666 1666   - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
1667 1667   - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
... ... @@ -1673,9 +1673,11 @@
1673 1673  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1674 1674   - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
1675 1675   - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
1676 -{{/expandable}}
1677 1677  
1678 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
2183 +----
2184 +
2185 +## **Critique and Observations**##
2186 +
1679 1679  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1680 1680   - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
1681 1681   - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
... ... @@ -1687,22 +1687,29 @@
1687 1687  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1688 1688   - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
1689 1689   - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
1690 -{{/expandable}}
1691 1691  
1692 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
2199 +----
2200 +
2201 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1693 1693  - Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
1694 1694  - Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
1695 -- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
1696 -{{/expandable}}
2204 +- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
1697 1697  
1698 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
2206 +----
2207 +
2208 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2209 +
1699 1699  1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
1700 1700  2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
1701 1701  3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
1702 -{{/expandable}}
1703 1703  
1704 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1705 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
1706 -##~{~{/expand}}##
1707 -{{/expandable}}
1708 -{{/expandable}}
2214 +----
2215 +
2216 +## **Summary of Research Study**
2217 +This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
2218 +
2219 +----
2220 +
2221 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
2222 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
2223 +{{/expand}}
Cultural Voyeurism A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Intera.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -103.1 KB
Content