0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 99.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/04/16 01:50
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 71.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 05:06
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,549 +1,637 @@
1 1  = Research at a Glance =
2 2  
3 +== Introduction ==
3 3  
5 +Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various fields such as **social psychology, public policy, behavioral economics, and more**. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout.
4 4  
5 - Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various important Racial themes. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout. I wanted to make this for a couple of reasons. Number one is organization. There are a ton of useful studies out there that expose the truth, sometimes inadvertently. You'll notice that in this initial draft the summaries are often woke and reflect the bias of the AI writing them as well as the researchers politically correct conclusion in most cases. That's because I haven't gotten to going through and pointing out the reasons I put all of them in here.
7 +=== How to Use This Repository ===
6 6  
9 +- Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
10 +- Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
11 +- Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
12 +- If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
7 7  
8 - There is often an underlying hypocrisy or double standard, saying the quiet part out loud, or conclusions that are so much of an antithesis to what the data shows that made me want to include it. At least, thats the idea for once its polished. I have about 150 more studies to upload, so it will be a few weeks before I get through it all. Until such time, feel free to search for them yourself and edit in what you find, or add your own studies. If you like you can do it manually, or if you'd rather go the route I did, just rename the study to its doi number and feed the study into an AI and tell them to summarize the study using the following format:
14 +{{toc/}}
9 9  
10 -{{example}}
11 -~= Study: [Study Title] =
16 +== Research Studies Repository ==
12 12  
13 -~{~{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
14 -~*~*Source:~*~* *[Journal/Institution Name]*
15 -~*~*Date of Publication:~*~* *[Publication Date]*
16 -~*~*Author(s):~*~* *[Author(s) Name(s)]*
17 -~*~*Title:~*~* *"[Study Title]"*
18 -~*~*DOI:~*~* [DOI or Link]
19 -~*~*Subject Matter:~*~* *[Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]*Β 
20 20  
21 -~-~--
19 += Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding =
20 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
21 +**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
22 +**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
23 +**Author(s):** Smith et al.
24 +**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
25 +**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
26 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
22 22  
23 -~#~# ~*~*Key Statistics~*~*
24 -~1. ~*~*General Observations:~*~*
28 +**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
29 +
30 +=== **Key Statistics** ===
31 +
32 +1. **General Observations:**
33 + - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
34 + - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
35 +
36 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
37 + - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
38 + - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
39 +
40 +=== **Findings** ===
41 +
42 +- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
43 +- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
44 +
45 +=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
46 +
47 +- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
48 +- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
49 +{{/expand}}
50 +
51 +{{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
52 +**Source:** [Journal/Institution Name]
53 +**Date of Publication:** [Publication Date]
54 +**Author(s):** [Author(s) Name(s)]
55 +**Title:** "[Study Title]"
56 +**DOI:** [DOI or Link]
57 +**Subject Matter:** [Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]
58 +
59 +---
60 +
61 +## **Key Statistics**
62 +1. **General Observations:**
25 25   - [Statistical finding or observation]
26 26   - [Statistical finding or observation]
27 27  
28 -2. ~*~*Subgroup Analysis:~*~*
66 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
29 29   - [Breakdown of findings by gender, race, or other subgroups]
30 30  
31 -3. ~*~*Other Significant Data Points:~*~*
69 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
32 32   - [Any additional findings or significant statistics]
33 33  
34 -~-~--
72 +---
35 35  
36 -~#~# ~*~*Findings~*~*
37 -~1. ~*~*Primary Observations:~*~*
74 +## **Findings**
75 +1. **Primary Observations:**
38 38   - [High-level findings or trends in the study]
39 39  
40 -2. ~*~*Subgroup Trends:~*~*
78 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
41 41   - [Disparities or differences highlighted in the study]
42 42  
43 -3. ~*~*Specific Case Analysis:~*~*
81 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
44 44   - [Detailed explanation of any notable specific findings]
45 45  
46 -~-~--
84 +---
47 47  
48 -~#~# ~*~*Critique and Observations~*~*
49 -~1. ~*~*Strengths of the Study:~*~*
86 +## **Critique and Observations**
87 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
50 50   - [Examples: strong methodology, large dataset, etc.]
51 51  
52 -2. ~*~*Limitations of the Study:~*~*
90 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
53 53   - [Examples: data gaps, lack of upstream analysis, etc.]
54 54  
55 -3. ~*~*Suggestions for Improvement:~*~*
93 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
56 56   - [Ideas for further research or addressing limitations]
57 57  
58 -~-~--
96 +---
59 59  
60 -~#~# ~*~*Relevance to Subproject~*~*
98 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
61 61  - [Explanation of how this study contributes to your subproject goals.]
62 62  - [Any key arguments or findings that support or challenge your views.]
63 63  
64 -~-~--
102 +---
65 65  
66 -~#~# ~*~*Suggestions for Further Exploration~*~*
67 -~1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
104 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
105 +1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
68 68  2. [Potential studies or sources to complement this analysis.]
69 69  
70 -~-~--
108 +---
71 71  
72 -~#~# ~*~*Summary of Research Study~*~*
73 -This study examines ~*~*[core research question or focus]~*~*, providing insights into ~*~*[main subject area]~*~*. The research utilized ~*~*[sample size and methodology]~*~* to assess ~*~*[key variables or measured outcomes]~*~*.Β 
110 +## **Summary of Research Study**
111 +This study examines **[core research question or focus]**, providing insights into **[main subject area]**. The research utilized **[sample size and methodology]** to assess **[key variables or measured outcomes]**.
74 74  
75 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
113 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
76 76  
77 -~-~--
115 +---
78 78  
79 -~#~# ~*~*πŸ“„ Download Full Study~*~*
80 -~{~{velocity}}
81 -#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
82 -#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
83 -#if($xwiki.exists("attach~:$filename"))
84 -~[~[Download Full Study>>attach~:$filename]]
85 -#else
86 -~{~{html}}<span style="color:red; font-weight:bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>~{~{/html}}
87 -#end
88 -~{~{/velocity}}
117 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
118 +{{velocity}}
119 +#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
120 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
121 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
122 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
123 +#else
124 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
125 +#end
126 +{{/velocity}}
89 89  
90 -~{~{/expand}}
128 +{{/expand}}
91 91  
92 -
93 -{{/example}}
130 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
94 94  
95 95  
96 96  
97 -- Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
98 -- Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
99 -- Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
100 -- If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
101 -- You'll also find a download link to the original full study in pdf form at the bottom of the collapsible block.
134 +---
102 102  
136 +{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}}
137 +**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
138 +**Date of Publication:** *2020*
139 +**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
140 +**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
141 +**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
142 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*
103 103  
104 -{{toc/}}
144 +---
105 105  
106 -
107 -
108 -
109 -
110 -= Genetics =
111 -
112 -
113 -{{expandable summary="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
114 -**Source:** *Nature*
115 -**Date of Publication:** *2009*
116 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
117 -**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
118 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
119 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*Β 
120 -
121 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
146 +## **Key Statistics**
122 122  1. **General Observations:**
123 - - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
124 - - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
148 + - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
149 + - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
125 125  
126 126  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
127 - - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
128 - - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
152 + - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
153 + - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
129 129  
130 130  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
131 - - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
132 - - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
133 -{{/expandable}}
156 + - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
157 + - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
134 134  
135 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
159 +---
160 +
161 +## **Findings**
136 136  1. **Primary Observations:**
137 - - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
138 - - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
163 + - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
164 + - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
139 139  
140 140  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
141 - - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
142 - - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
167 + - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
168 + - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
143 143  
144 144  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
145 - - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
146 - - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
147 -{{/expandable}}
171 + - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
172 + - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
148 148  
149 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
174 +---
175 +
176 +## **Critique and Observations**
150 150  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
151 - - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
152 - - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
178 + - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
179 + - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
153 153  
154 154  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
155 - - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
156 - - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
182 + - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
183 + - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
157 157  
158 158  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
159 - - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
160 - - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
161 -{{/expandable}}
186 + - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
187 + - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
162 162  
163 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
164 -- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
165 -- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
166 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
167 -{{/expandable}}
189 +---
168 168  
169 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
170 -1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
171 -2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
172 -3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
173 -{{/expandable}}
191 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
192 +- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
193 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
174 174  
175 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
176 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
177 -##
178 - ##
179 -{{/expandable}}
180 -{{/expandable}}
195 +---
181 181  
182 -{{expandable summary="
197 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
198 +1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
199 +2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
183 183  
201 +---
184 184  
185 -Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
186 -**Source:** *Nature*
187 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
188 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
189 -**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
190 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
191 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*Β 
203 +## **Summary of Research Study**
204 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.
192 192  
193 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
206 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
207 +
208 +---
209 +
210 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
211 +{{velocity}}
212 +#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
213 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
214 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
215 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
216 +#else
217 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
218 +#end
219 +{{/velocity}}
220 +
221 +{{/expand}}
222 +
223 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
224 +
225 +
226 +{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}}
227 +**Source:** *Current Psychology*
228 +**Date of Publication:** *2024*
229 +**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
230 +**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
231 +**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
232 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
233 +
234 +---
235 +
236 +## **Key Statistics**
194 194  1. **General Observations:**
195 - - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
196 - - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
238 + - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
239 + - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
197 197  
198 198  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
199 - - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
200 - - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
242 + - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
243 + - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
201 201  
202 202  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
203 - - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
204 - - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
205 -{{/expandable}}
246 + - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
247 + - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
206 206  
207 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
249 +---
250 +
251 +## **Findings**
208 208  1. **Primary Observations:**
209 - - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
210 - - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
253 + - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
254 + - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
211 211  
212 212  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
213 - - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
214 - - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
257 + - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
258 + - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
215 215  
216 216  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
217 - - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
218 - - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
219 -{{/expandable}}
261 + - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
262 + - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
220 220  
221 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
264 +---
265 +
266 +## **Critique and Observations**
222 222  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
223 - - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
224 - - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
268 + - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
269 + - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
225 225  
226 226  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
227 - - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
228 - - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
272 + - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
273 + - **No causal conclusions**β€”correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
229 229  
230 230  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
231 - - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
232 - - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
233 -{{/expandable}}
276 + - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
277 + - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
234 234  
235 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
236 -- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
237 -- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
238 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
239 -{{/expandable}}
279 +---
240 240  
241 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
242 -1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
243 -2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
244 -3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
245 -{{/expandable}}
281 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
282 +- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
283 +- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
284 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
246 246  
247 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
248 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
249 -##
250 - ##
251 -{{/expandable}}
252 -{{/expandable}}
286 +---
253 253  
254 -{{expandable summary="
288 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
289 +1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
290 +2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
291 +3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
255 255  
293 +---
256 256  
257 -Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
258 -**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
259 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
260 -**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
261 -**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
262 -**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
263 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
295 +## **Summary of Research Study**
296 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.
264 264  
265 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
266 -1. **General Observations:**
267 - - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
268 - - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
298 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
269 269  
270 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
271 - - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
272 - - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
300 +---
273 273  
274 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
275 - - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
276 - - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
277 -{{/expandable}}
302 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
303 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
278 278  
279 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
280 -1. **Primary Observations:**
281 - - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
282 - - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
305 +{{/expand}}
283 283  
284 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
285 - - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (70-80%)**.
286 - - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
307 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
287 287  
288 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
289 - - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
290 - - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
291 -{{/expandable}}
309 +{{expand title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" expanded="false"}} Source: Addictive Behaviors
310 +Date of Publication: 2016
311 +Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
312 +Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
313 +DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
314 +Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
292 292  
293 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
294 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
295 - - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
296 - - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
316 +Key Statistics
317 +General Observations:
297 297  
298 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
299 - - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
300 - - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
319 +Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
320 +Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
321 +Subgroup Analysis:
301 301  
302 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
303 - - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
304 - - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
305 -{{/expandable}}
323 +Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
324 +Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
325 +Other Significant Data Points:
306 306  
307 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
308 -- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
309 -- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
310 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
311 -{{/expandable}}
327 +Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
328 +Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
329 +Findings
330 +Primary Observations:
312 312  
313 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
314 -1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
315 -2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
316 -3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
317 -{{/expandable}}
332 +Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
333 +Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
334 +Subgroup Trends:
318 318  
319 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
320 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
321 -{{/expandable}}
322 -{{/expandable}}
336 +Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
337 +College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
338 +Specific Case Analysis:
323 323  
324 -{{expandable summary="
340 +Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
341 +Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
342 +Critique and Observations
343 +Strengths of the Study:
325 325  
345 +Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
346 +Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
347 +Limitations of the Study:
326 326  
327 -Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
328 -**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
329 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
330 -**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
331 -**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
332 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
333 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*Β 
349 +Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
350 +Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
351 +Suggestions for Improvement:
334 334  
335 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
353 +Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
354 +Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
355 +Relevance to Subproject
356 +Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
357 +Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
358 +Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
359 +Suggestions for Further Exploration
360 +Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
361 +Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
362 +Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
363 +Summary of Research Study
364 +This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
365 +
366 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
367 +
368 +πŸ“„ Download Full Study
369 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
370 +
371 +{{/expand}}
372 +
373 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
374 +
375 +{{expand title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?" expanded="false"}}
376 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
377 +**Date of Publication:** *2014*
378 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
379 +**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
380 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
381 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
382 +
383 +---
384 +
385 +## **Key Statistics**
336 336  1. **General Observations:**
337 - - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
338 - - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
387 + - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
388 + - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
339 339  
340 340  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
341 - - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
342 - - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
391 + - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
392 + - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
343 343  
344 344  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
345 - - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
346 - - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
347 -{{/expandable}}
395 + - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
396 + - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
348 348  
349 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
398 +---
399 +
400 +## **Findings**
350 350  1. **Primary Observations:**
351 - - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
352 - - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
402 + - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
403 + - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
353 353  
354 354  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
355 - - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
356 - - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
406 + - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
407 + - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
357 357  
358 358  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
359 - - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
360 - - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
361 -{{/expandable}}
410 + - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
411 + - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
362 362  
363 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
413 +---
414 +
415 +## **Critique and Observations**
364 364  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
365 - - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
366 - - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
417 + - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
418 + - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
367 367  
368 368  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
369 - - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
370 - - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
421 + - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
422 + - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
371 371  
372 372  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
373 - - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
374 - - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
375 -{{/expandable}}
425 + - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
426 + - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
376 376  
377 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
378 -- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
379 -- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
380 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
381 -{{/expandable}}
428 +---
382 382  
383 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
384 -1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
385 -2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
386 -3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
387 -{{/expandable}}
430 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
431 +- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
432 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
433 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
388 388  
389 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
390 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
391 -{{/expandable}}
392 -{{/expandable}}
435 +---
393 393  
394 -{{expandable summary="
437 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
438 +1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
439 +2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
440 +3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
395 395  
442 +---
396 396  
397 -Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
398 -**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
399 -**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
400 -**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
401 -**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
402 -**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
403 -**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*
444 +## **Summary of Research Study**
445 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.
404 404  
405 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
447 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
448 +
449 +---
450 +
451 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
452 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
453 +
454 +{{/expand}}
455 +
456 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
457 +
458 +{{expand title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation" expanded="false"}}
459 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
460 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
461 +**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
462 +**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
463 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
464 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
465 +
466 +---
467 +
468 +## **Key Statistics**
406 406  1. **General Observations:**
407 - - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
408 - - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
470 + - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
471 + - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
409 409  
410 410  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
411 - - Examines **West Eurasian populations** and their genetic evolution.
412 - - Tracks **changes in allele frequencies over millennia**.
474 + - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
475 + - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
413 413  
414 414  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
415 - - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
416 - - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
417 -{{/expandable}}
478 + - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
479 + - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
418 418  
419 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
481 +---
482 +
483 +## **Findings**
420 420  1. **Primary Observations:**
421 - - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
422 - - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
485 + - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
486 + - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
423 423  
424 424  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
425 - - Selection pressure on **energy storage genes** supports the **Thrifty Gene Hypothesis**.
426 - - **Cognitive performance-related alleles** have undergone selection, but their historical advantages remain unclear.
489 + - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
490 + - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
427 427  
428 428  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
429 - - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
430 - - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
431 - - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
432 -{{/expandable}}
493 + - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
494 + - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
433 433  
434 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
496 +---
497 +
498 +## **Critique and Observations**
435 435  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
436 - - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
437 - - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
500 + - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
501 + - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
438 438  
439 439  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
440 - - Findings **may not translate directly** to modern populations.
441 - - **Unclear whether observed selection pressures persist today**.
504 + - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
505 + - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**β€”future studies may identify more.
442 442  
443 443  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
444 - - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
445 - - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
446 -{{/expandable}}
508 + - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
509 + - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
447 447  
448 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
449 -- Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
450 -- Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
451 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.
452 -{{/expandable}}
511 +---
453 453  
454 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
455 -1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
456 -2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
457 -3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
458 -{{/expandable}}
513 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
514 +- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
515 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
516 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
459 459  
460 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
461 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]
462 -{{/expandable}}
463 -{{/expandable}}
518 +---
464 464  
465 -{{expandable summary="
520 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
521 +1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
522 +2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
523 +3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
466 466  
525 +---
467 467  
468 -Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
469 -**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
470 -**Date of Publication:** *2013*
471 -**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
472 -**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
473 -**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
474 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
527 +## **Summary of Research Study**
528 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.
475 475  
476 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
530 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
531 +
532 +---
533 +
534 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
535 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
536 +
537 +{{/expand}}
538 +
539 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
540 +
541 +{{expand title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media" expanded="false"}}
542 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
543 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
544 +**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
545 +**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
546 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
547 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
548 +
549 +---
550 +
551 +## **Key Statistics**
477 477  1. **General Observations:**
478 - - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
479 - - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
553 + - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
554 + - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
480 480  
481 481  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
482 - - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
483 - - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
557 + - **90% of experts were from Western countries**, and **83% were male**.
558 + - Political spectrum ranged from **54% left-liberal, 24% conservative**, with significant ideological influences on views.
484 484  
485 485  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
486 - - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
487 - - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
488 -{{/expandable}}
561 + - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
562 + - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
489 489  
490 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
564 +---
565 +
566 +## **Findings**
491 491  1. **Primary Observations:**
492 - - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
493 - - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
568 + - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
569 + - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
494 494  
495 495  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
496 - - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
497 - - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
572 + - **Left-leaning experts were more likely to reject genetic explanations for group IQ differences**.
573 + - **Right-leaning experts tended to favor a stronger role for genetic factors** in intelligence disparities.
498 498  
499 499  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
500 - - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
501 - - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
502 -{{/expandable}}
576 + - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
577 + - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
503 503  
504 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
579 +---
580 +
581 +## **Critique and Observations**
505 505  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
506 - - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
507 - - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
583 + - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
584 + - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
508 508  
509 509  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
510 - - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
511 - - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
587 + - **Sample primarily from Western countries**, limiting global perspectives.
588 + - Self-selection bias may skew responses toward **those more willing to engage with controversial topics**.
512 512  
513 513  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
514 - - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
515 - - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
516 -{{/expandable}}
591 + - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
592 + - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
517 517  
518 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
519 -- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
520 -- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
521 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
522 -{{/expandable}}
594 +---
523 523  
524 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
525 -1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
526 -2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
527 -3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
528 -{{/expandable}}
596 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
597 +- Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
598 +- Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
599 +- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
529 529  
530 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
531 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
532 -{{/expandable}}
533 -{{/expandable}}
601 +---
534 534  
535 -{{expandable summary="
603 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
604 +1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
605 +2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
606 +3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
536 536  
608 +---
537 537  
538 -Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
539 -**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
540 -**Date of Publication:** *2010*
541 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
542 -**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
543 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
544 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
610 +## **Summary of Research Study**
611 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.
545 545  
546 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
613 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
614 +
615 +---
616 +
617 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
618 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
619 +
620 +{{/expand}}
621 +
622 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
623 +
624 +{{expand title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications" expanded="false"}}
625 +**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
626 +**Date of Publication:** *2010*
627 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
628 +**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
629 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
630 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
631 +
632 +---
633 +
634 +## **Key Statistics**
547 547  1. **General Observations:**
548 548   - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
549 549   - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
... ... @@ -555,9 +555,10 @@
555 555  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
556 556   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
557 557   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
558 -{{/expandable}}
559 559  
560 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
647 +---
648 +
649 +## **Findings**
561 561  1. **Primary Observations:**
562 562   - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
563 563   - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
... ... @@ -569,9 +569,10 @@
569 569  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
570 570   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
571 571   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
572 -{{/expandable}}
573 573  
574 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
662 +---
663 +
664 +## **Critique and Observations**
575 575  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
576 576   - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
577 577   - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
... ... @@ -583,733 +583,549 @@
583 583  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
584 584   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
585 585   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
586 -{{/expandable}}
587 587  
588 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
677 +---
678 +
679 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
589 589  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
590 590  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
591 591  - Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
592 -{{/expandable}}
593 593  
594 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
684 +---
685 +
686 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
595 595  1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
596 596  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
597 597  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
598 -{{/expandable}}
599 599  
600 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
691 +---
692 +
693 +## **Summary of Research Study**
694 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.
695 +
696 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
697 +
698 +---
699 +
700 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
601 601  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
602 -{{/expandable}}
603 -{{/expandable}}
604 604  
605 -= IQ =
703 +{{/expand}}
606 606  
607 -{{expandable summary="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
608 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
609 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
610 -**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
611 -**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
612 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
613 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
705 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
614 614  
615 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
707 +{{expand title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age" expanded="false"}}
708 +**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
709 +**Date of Publication:** *2013*
710 +**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
711 +**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
712 +**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
713 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
714 +
715 +---
716 +
717 +## **Key Statistics**
616 616  1. **General Observations:**
617 - - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
618 - - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
719 + - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
720 + - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
619 619  
620 620  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
621 - - **90% of experts were from Western countries**, and **83% were male**.
622 - - Political spectrum ranged from **54% left-liberal, 24% conservative**, with significant ideological influences on views.
723 + - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
724 + - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
623 623  
624 624  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
625 - - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
626 - - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
627 -{{/expandable}}
727 + - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
728 + - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
628 628  
629 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
730 +---
731 +
732 +## **Findings**
630 630  1. **Primary Observations:**
631 - - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
632 - - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
734 + - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
735 + - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
633 633  
634 634  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
635 - - **Left-leaning experts were more likely to reject genetic explanations for group IQ differences**.
636 - - **Right-leaning experts tended to favor a stronger role for genetic factors** in intelligence disparities.
738 + - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
739 + - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
637 637  
638 638  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
639 - - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
640 - - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
641 -{{/expandable}}
742 + - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
743 + - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
642 642  
643 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
745 +---
746 +
747 +## **Critique and Observations**
644 644  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
645 - - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
646 - - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
749 + - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
750 + - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
647 647  
648 648  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
649 - - **Sample primarily from Western countries**, limiting global perspectives.
650 - - Self-selection bias may skew responses toward **those more willing to engage with controversial topics**.
753 + - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
754 + - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
651 651  
652 652  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
653 - - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
654 - - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
655 -{{/expandable}}
757 + - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
758 + - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
656 656  
657 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
658 -- Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
659 -- Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
660 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
661 -{{/expandable}}
760 +---
662 662  
663 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
664 -1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
665 -2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
666 -3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
667 -{{/expandable}}
762 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
763 +- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
764 +- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
765 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
668 668  
669 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
670 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
671 -{{/expandable}}
672 -{{/expandable}}
767 +---
673 673  
674 -{{expandable summary="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
675 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
676 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
677 -**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
678 -**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
679 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
680 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
769 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
770 +1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
771 +2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
772 +3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
681 681  
682 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
683 -1. **General Observations:**
684 - - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
685 - - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
774 +---
686 686  
687 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
688 - - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
689 - - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
776 +## **Summary of Research Study**
777 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.
690 690  
691 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
692 - - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
693 - - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
694 -{{/expandable}}
779 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
695 695  
696 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
697 -1. **Primary Observations:**
698 - - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
699 - - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
781 +---
700 700  
701 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
702 - - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
703 - - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
783 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
784 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
704 704  
705 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
706 - - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
707 - - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
708 -{{/expandable}}
786 +{{/expand}}
709 709  
710 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
711 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
712 - - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
713 - - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
788 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
714 714  
715 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
716 - - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
717 - - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**β€”future studies may identify more.
790 +{{expand title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports" expanded="false"}}
791 +**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
792 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
793 +**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
794 +**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
795 +**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
796 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
718 718  
719 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
720 - - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
721 - - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
722 -{{/expandable}}
798 +---
723 723  
724 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
725 -- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
726 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
727 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
728 -{{/expandable}}
729 -
730 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
731 -1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
732 -2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
733 -3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
734 -{{/expandable}}
735 -
736 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
737 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
738 -{{/expandable}}
739 -{{/expandable}}
740 -
741 -{{expandable summary="Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding"}}
742 -**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
743 -**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
744 -**Author(s):** Smith et al.
745 -**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
746 -**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
747 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
748 -{{/expandable}}
749 -
750 -= Dating =
751 -
752 -{{expandable summary="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
753 -**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
754 -**Date of Publication:** *2020*
755 -**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
756 -**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
757 -**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
758 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*Β 
759 -
760 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
800 +## **Key Statistics**
761 761  1. **General Observations:**
762 - - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
763 - - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
802 + - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
803 + - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
764 764  
765 765  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
766 - - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
767 - - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
806 + - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
807 + - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
768 768  
769 769  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
770 - - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
771 - - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
772 -{{/expandable}}
810 + - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
811 + - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
773 773  
774 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
813 +---
814 +
815 +## **Findings**
775 775  1. **Primary Observations:**
776 - - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
777 - - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
817 + - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
818 + - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
778 778  
779 779  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
780 - - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
781 - - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
821 + - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
822 + - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
782 782  
783 783  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
784 - - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
785 - - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
786 -{{/expandable}}
825 + - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
826 + - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
787 787  
788 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
828 +---
829 +
830 +## **Critique and Observations**
789 789  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
790 - - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
791 - - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
832 + - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
833 + - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
792 792  
793 793  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
794 - - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
795 - - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
836 + - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
837 + - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
796 796  
797 797  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
798 - - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
799 - - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
800 -{{/expandable}}
840 + - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
841 + - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
801 801  
802 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
803 -- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
804 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
805 -{{/expandable}}
843 +---
806 806  
807 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
808 -1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
809 -2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
810 -{{/expandable}}
845 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
846 +- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
847 +- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
848 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
811 811  
812 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
850 +---
813 813  
814 -{{/expandable}}
815 -{{/expandable}}
852 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
853 +1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
854 +2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
855 +3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
816 816  
817 -{{expandable summary="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
818 -**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
819 -**Date of Publication:** *2012*
820 -**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
821 -**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
822 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
823 -**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*
857 +---
824 824  
825 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
826 -1. **General Observations:**
827 - - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
828 - - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
859 +## **Summary of Research Study**
860 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.
829 829  
830 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
831 - - **Maternal race had a stronger influence than paternal race** on birth outcomes.
832 - - **Black mother–White father (BMWF) couples** had a higher risk than **White mother–Black father (WMBF) couples**.
862 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
833 833  
834 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
835 - - **Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for key outcomes:**
836 - - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
837 - - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
838 - - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
839 -{{/expandable}}
864 +---
840 840  
841 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
842 -1. **Primary Observations:**
843 - - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
844 - - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
866 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
867 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
845 845  
846 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
847 - - **Black mothers (regardless of paternal race) had the highest risk of LBW and PTB**.
848 - - **White mothers with Black fathers had a lower risk** than Black mothers with White fathers.
869 +{{/expand}}
849 849  
850 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
851 - - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
852 - - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
853 -{{/expandable}}
871 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
854 854  
855 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
856 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
857 - - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
858 - - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
873 +{{expand title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History" expanded="false"}}
874 +**Source:** *Nature*
875 +**Date of Publication:** *2009*
876 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
877 +**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
878 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
879 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*
859 859  
860 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
861 - - Data limited to **Black-White biracial couples**, excluding other racial groups.
862 - - **Socioeconomic and healthcare access factors** not fully explored.
881 +---
863 863  
864 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
865 - - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
866 - - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
867 -{{/expandable}}
868 -
869 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
870 -- Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
871 -- Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
872 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.
873 -{{/expandable}}
874 -
875 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
876 -1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
877 -2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
878 -3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
879 -{{/expandable}}
880 -
881 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
882 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]
883 -{{/expandable}}
884 -{{/expandable}}
885 -
886 -{{expandable summary="
887 -
888 -
889 -Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
890 -**Source:** *Current Psychology*
891 -**Date of Publication:** *2024*
892 -**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
893 -**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
894 -**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
895 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*Β 
896 -
897 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
883 +## **Key Statistics**
898 898  1. **General Observations:**
899 - - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
900 - - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
885 + - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
886 + - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
901 901  
902 902  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
903 - - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
904 - - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
889 + - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
890 + - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
905 905  
906 906  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
907 - - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
908 - - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
909 -{{/expandable}}
893 + - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
894 + - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
910 910  
911 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
896 +---
897 +
898 +## **Findings**
912 912  1. **Primary Observations:**
913 - - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
914 - - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
900 + - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
901 + - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
915 915  
916 916  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
917 - - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
918 - - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
904 + - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
905 + - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
919 919  
920 920  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
921 - - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
922 - - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
923 -{{/expandable}}
908 + - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
909 + - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
924 924  
925 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
911 +---
912 +
913 +## **Critique and Observations**
926 926  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
927 - - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
928 - - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
915 + - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
916 + - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
929 929  
930 930  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
931 - - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
932 - - **No causal conclusions**β€”correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
919 + - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
920 + - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
933 933  
934 934  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
935 - - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
936 - - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
937 -{{/expandable}}
923 + - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
924 + - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
938 938  
939 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
940 -- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
941 -- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
942 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
943 -{{/expandable}}
926 +---
944 944  
945 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
946 -1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
947 -2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
948 -3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
949 -{{/expandable}}
928 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
929 +- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
930 +- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
931 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
950 950  
951 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
952 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
953 -{{/expandable}}
933 +---
954 954  
955 -= Crime and Substance Abuse =
935 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
936 +1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
937 +2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
938 +3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
956 956  
957 -{{/expandable}}
940 +---
958 958  
959 -{{expandable summary="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
960 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
961 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
962 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
963 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
964 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
965 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
942 +## **Summary of Research Study**
943 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populationsβ€”**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.
966 966  
967 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
945 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
946 +
947 +---
948 +
949 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
950 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
951 +
952 +{{/expand}}
953 +
954 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
955 +
956 +
957 +{{expand title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations" expanded="false"}}
958 +**Source:** *Nature*
959 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
960 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
961 +**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
962 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
963 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
964 +
965 +---
966 +
967 +## **Key Statistics**
968 968  1. **General Observations:**
969 - - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
970 - - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
969 + - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
970 + - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
971 971  
972 972  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
973 - - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
974 - - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
973 + - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
974 + - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
975 975  
976 976  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
977 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
978 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
979 -{{/expandable}}
977 + - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
978 + - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
980 980  
981 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
980 +---
981 +
982 +## **Findings**
982 982  1. **Primary Observations:**
983 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
984 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
984 + - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
985 + - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
985 985  
986 986  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
987 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
988 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
988 + - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
989 + - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
989 989  
990 990  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
991 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
992 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
993 -{{/expandable}}
992 + - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
993 + - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
994 994  
995 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
995 +---
996 +
997 +## **Critique and Observations**
996 996  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
997 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
998 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
999 + - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
1000 + - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
999 999  
1000 1000  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1001 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1002 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1003 + - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
1004 + - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
1003 1003  
1004 1004  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1005 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1006 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1007 -{{/expandable}}
1007 + - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
1008 + - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
1008 1008  
1009 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1010 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1011 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1012 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1013 -{{/expandable}}
1010 +---
1014 1014  
1015 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1016 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1017 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1018 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1019 -{{/expandable}}
1012 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1013 +- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
1014 +- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
1015 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
1020 1020  
1021 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1022 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1023 -{{/expandable}}
1024 -{{/expandable}}
1017 +---
1025 1025  
1026 -{{expandable summary="
1019 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1020 +1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
1021 +2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
1022 +3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
1027 1027  
1024 +---
1028 1028  
1029 -Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1030 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1031 -**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1032 -**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1033 -**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1034 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1035 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*Β 
1026 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1027 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.
1036 1036  
1037 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1038 -1. **General Observations:**
1039 - - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1040 - - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1029 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1041 1041  
1042 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1043 - - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1044 - - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1031 +---
1045 1045  
1046 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1047 - - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1048 - - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1049 -{{/expandable}}
1033 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
1034 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
1050 1050  
1051 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1052 -1. **Primary Observations:**
1053 - - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1054 - - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1036 +{{/expand}}
1055 1055  
1056 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1057 - - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1058 - - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1038 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1059 1059  
1060 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1061 - - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1062 - - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1063 -{{/expandable}}
1040 +{{expand title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies" expanded="false"}}
1041 +**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
1042 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1043 +**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
1044 +**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
1045 +**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
1046 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
1064 1064  
1065 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1066 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1067 - - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1068 - - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1048 +---
1069 1069  
1070 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1071 - - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1072 - - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1073 -
1074 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1075 - - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1076 - - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1077 -{{/expandable}}
1078 -
1079 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1080 -- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1081 -- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1082 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1083 -{{/expandable}}
1084 -
1085 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1086 -1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1087 -2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1088 -3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1089 -{{/expandable}}
1090 -
1091 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1092 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1093 -{{/expandable}}
1094 -{{/expandable}}
1095 -
1096 -{{expandable summary="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1097 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1098 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1099 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1100 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1101 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1102 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1103 -
1104 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1050 +## **Key Statistics**
1105 1105  1. **General Observations:**
1106 - - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1107 - - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1052 + - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
1053 + - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
1108 1108  
1109 1109  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1110 - - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1111 - - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1056 + - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
1057 + - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
1112 1112  
1113 1113  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1114 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1115 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1116 -{{/expandable}}
1060 + - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
1061 + - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
1117 1117  
1118 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1063 +---
1064 +
1065 +## **Findings**
1119 1119  1. **Primary Observations:**
1120 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1121 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1067 + - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
1068 + - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
1122 1122  
1123 1123  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1124 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1125 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1071 + - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (~70-80%)**.
1072 + - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
1126 1126  
1127 1127  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1128 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1129 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1130 -{{/expandable}}
1075 + - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
1076 + - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
1131 1131  
1132 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1078 +---
1079 +
1080 +## **Critique and Observations**
1133 1133  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1134 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1135 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1082 + - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
1083 + - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
1136 1136  
1137 1137  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1138 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1139 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1086 + - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
1087 + - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
1140 1140  
1141 1141  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1142 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1143 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1144 -{{/expandable}}
1090 + - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
1091 + - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
1145 1145  
1146 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1147 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1148 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1149 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1150 -{{/expandable}}
1093 +---
1151 1151  
1152 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1153 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1154 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1155 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1156 -{{/expandable}}
1095 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1096 +- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
1097 +- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
1098 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
1157 1157  
1158 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1159 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1160 -{{/expandable}}
1161 -{{/expandable}}
1100 +---
1162 1162  
1163 -{{expandable summary="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1102 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1103 +1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
1104 +2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
1105 +3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
1164 1164  
1165 -{{/expandable}}
1107 +---
1166 1166  
1167 -{{expandable summary="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1168 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1169 -**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1170 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1171 -**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1172 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1173 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
1109 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1110 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.
1174 1174  
1175 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1112 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1113 +
1114 +---
1115 +
1116 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
1117 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
1118 +
1119 +{{/expand}}
1120 +
1121 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1122 +
1123 +{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}}
1124 +**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
1125 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1126 +**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
1127 +**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
1128 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
1129 +**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*
1130 +
1131 +---
1132 +
1133 +## **Key Statistics**
1176 1176  1. **General Observations:**
1177 - - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1178 - - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
1135 + - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
1136 + - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
1179 1179  
1180 1180  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1181 - - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
1182 - - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
1139 + - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
1140 + - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
1183 1183  
1184 1184  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1185 - - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1186 - - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1187 -{{/expandable}}
1143 + - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
1144 + - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
1188 1188  
1189 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1146 +---
1147 +
1148 +## **Findings**
1190 1190  1. **Primary Observations:**
1191 - - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1192 - - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
1150 + - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
1151 + - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
1193 1193  
1194 1194  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1195 - - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
1196 - - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
1154 + - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
1155 + - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
1197 1197  
1198 1198  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1199 - - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1200 - - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1201 -{{/expandable}}
1158 + - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
1159 + - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
1202 1202  
1203 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1161 +---
1162 +
1163 +## **Critique and Observations**
1204 1204  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1205 - - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1206 - - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
1165 + - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
1166 + - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
1207 1207  
1208 1208  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1209 - - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
1210 - - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
1169 + - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
1170 + - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
1211 1211  
1212 1212  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1213 - - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1214 - - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1215 -{{/expandable}}
1173 + - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
1174 + - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
1216 1216  
1217 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1218 -- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1219 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1220 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
1221 -{{/expandable}}
1176 +---
1222 1222  
1223 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1224 -1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1225 -2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1226 -3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1227 -{{/expandable}}
1178 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1179 +- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
1180 +- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
1181 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
1228 1228  
1229 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1230 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
1231 -{{/expandable}}
1183 +---
1232 1232  
1233 -= Whiteness & White Guilt =
1185 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1186 +1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
1187 +2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
1188 +3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
1234 1234  
1235 -{{/expandable}}
1190 +---
1236 1236  
1237 -{{expandable summary="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1238 -**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1239 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1240 -**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1241 -**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1242 -**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1243 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
1192 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1193 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.
1244 1244  
1245 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1246 -1. **General Observations:**
1247 - - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1248 - - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
1195 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1249 1249  
1250 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1251 - - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
1252 - - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
1197 +---
1253 1253  
1254 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1255 - - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1256 - - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1257 -{{/expandable}}
1199 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
1200 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
1258 1258  
1259 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1260 -1. **Primary Observations:**
1261 - - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1262 - - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
1202 +{{/expand}}
1263 1263  
1264 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1265 - - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
1266 - - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
1204 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1267 1267  
1268 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1269 - - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1270 - - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1271 -{{/expandable}}
1272 1272  
1273 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1274 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1275 - - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1276 - - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
1277 1277  
1278 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1279 - - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
1280 - - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
1281 -
1282 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1283 - - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1284 - - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1285 -{{/expandable}}
1286 -
1287 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1288 -- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1289 -- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1290 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
1291 -{{/expandable}}
1292 -
1293 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1294 -1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1295 -2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1296 -3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1297 -{{/expandable}}
1298 -
1299 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1300 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
1301 -{{/expandable}}
1302 -{{/expandable}}
1303 -
1304 -{{expandable summary="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1305 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1306 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1307 -**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1208 +{{expand title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations" expanded="false"}}
1209 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1210 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1211 +**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1308 1308  **Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1309 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1310 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1213 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1214 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1311 1311  
1312 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1216 +---
1217 +
1218 +## **Key Statistics**
1313 1313  1. **General Observations:**
1314 1314   - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1315 1315   - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
... ... @@ -1321,9 +1321,10 @@
1321 1321  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1322 1322   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1323 1323   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1324 -{{/expandable}}
1325 1325  
1326 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1231 +---
1232 +
1233 +## **Findings**
1327 1327  1. **Primary Observations:**
1328 1328   - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1329 1329   - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
... ... @@ -1335,9 +1335,10 @@
1335 1335  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1336 1336   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1337 1337   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1338 -{{/expandable}}
1339 1339  
1340 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1246 +---
1247 +
1248 +## **Critique and Observations**
1341 1341  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1342 1342   - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1343 1343   - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
... ... @@ -1349,34 +1349,49 @@
1349 1349  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1350 1350   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1351 1351   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1352 -{{/expandable}}
1353 1353  
1354 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1261 +---
1262 +
1263 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1355 1355  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1356 1356  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1357 1357  - Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1358 -{{/expandable}}
1359 1359  
1360 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1268 +---
1269 +
1270 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1361 1361  1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1362 1362  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1363 1363  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1364 -{{/expandable}}
1365 1365  
1366 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1275 +---
1276 +
1277 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1278 +This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.
1279 +
1280 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1281 +
1282 +---
1283 +
1284 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
1367 1367  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1368 -{{/expandable}}
1369 -{{/expandable}}
1370 1370  
1371 -{{expandable summary="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1287 +{{/expand}}
1288 +
1289 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1290 +
1291 +
1292 +{{expand title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans" expanded="false"}}
1372 1372  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1373 1373  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
1374 1374  **Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1375 1375  **Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1376 1376  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1377 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*Β 
1298 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1378 1378  
1379 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1300 +---
1301 +
1302 +## **Key Statistics**
1380 1380  1. **General Observations:**
1381 1381   - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1382 1382   - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
... ... @@ -1388,9 +1388,10 @@
1388 1388  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1389 1389   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1390 1390   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1391 -{{/expandable}}
1392 1392  
1393 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1315 +---
1316 +
1317 +## **Findings**
1394 1394  1. **Primary Observations:**
1395 1395   - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1396 1396   - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
... ... @@ -1402,9 +1402,10 @@
1402 1402  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1403 1403   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1404 1404   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1405 -{{/expandable}}
1406 1406  
1407 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1330 +---
1331 +
1332 +## **Critique and Observations**
1408 1408  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1409 1409   - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1410 1410   - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
... ... @@ -1416,34 +1416,48 @@
1416 1416  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1417 1417   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1418 1418   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1419 -{{/expandable}}
1420 1420  
1421 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1345 +---
1346 +
1347 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1422 1422  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1423 1423  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1424 1424  - Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1425 -{{/expandable}}
1426 1426  
1427 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1352 +---
1353 +
1354 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1428 1428  1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1429 1429  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1430 1430  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1431 -{{/expandable}}
1432 1432  
1433 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1359 +---
1360 +
1361 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1362 +This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.
1363 +
1364 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1365 +
1366 +---
1367 +
1368 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
1434 1434  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1435 -{{/expandable}}
1436 -{{/expandable}}
1437 1437  
1438 -{{expandable summary="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1439 -**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1440 -**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1441 -**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1442 -**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1443 -**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1444 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1371 +{{/expand}}
1445 1445  
1446 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1373 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1374 +
1375 +{{expand title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?" expanded="false"}}
1376 +**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1377 +**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1378 +**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1379 +**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1380 +**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1381 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1382 +
1383 +---
1384 +
1385 +## **Key Statistics**
1447 1447  1. **General Observations:**
1448 1448   - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1449 1449   - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
... ... @@ -1455,9 +1455,10 @@
1455 1455  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1456 1456   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1457 1457   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1458 -{{/expandable}}
1459 1459  
1460 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1398 +---
1399 +
1400 +## **Findings**
1461 1461  1. **Primary Observations:**
1462 1462   - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1463 1463   - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
... ... @@ -1469,9 +1469,10 @@
1469 1469  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1470 1470   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1471 1471   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1472 -{{/expandable}}
1473 1473  
1474 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1413 +---
1414 +
1415 +## **Critique and Observations**
1475 1475  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1476 1476   - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1477 1477   - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
... ... @@ -1483,226 +1483,35 @@
1483 1483  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1484 1484   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1485 1485   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1486 -{{/expandable}}
1487 1487  
1488 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1428 +---
1429 +
1430 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1489 1489  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1490 1490  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1491 1491  - Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1492 -{{/expandable}}
1493 1493  
1494 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1435 +---
1436 +
1437 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1495 1495  1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1496 1496  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1497 1497  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1498 -{{/expandable}}
1499 1499  
1500 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1501 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1502 -{{/expandable}}
1442 +---
1503 1503  
1504 -= Media =
1444 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1445 +This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.
1505 1505  
1506 -{{/expandable}}
1447 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1507 1507  
1508 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic"}}
1509 -**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1510 -**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1511 -**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1512 -**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1513 -**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1514 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*
1449 +---
1515 1515  
1516 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1517 -1. **General Observations:**
1518 - - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1519 - - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
1451 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
1452 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1520 1520  
1521 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1522 - - **Anonymity and reduced social cues** in CMC increased hostility.
1523 - - **Echo chambers formed more frequently in algorithm-driven environments**.
1454 +{{/expand}}
1524 1524  
1525 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1526 - - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1527 - - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1528 -{{/expandable}}
1456 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1529 1529  
1530 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1531 -1. **Primary Observations:**
1532 - - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1533 - - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
1534 1534  
1535 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1536 - - Participants with **strong pre-existing biases became more polarized** after exposure to conflicting views.
1537 - - **Moderate users were more likely to disengage** from conflict-heavy discussions.
1538 -
1539 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1540 - - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1541 - - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1542 -{{/expandable}}
1543 -
1544 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1545 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1546 - - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1547 - - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
1548 -
1549 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1550 - - Lacks **qualitative analysis of user motivations**.
1551 - - Focuses on **Western social media platforms**, missing global perspectives.
1552 -
1553 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1554 - - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1555 - - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1556 -{{/expandable}}
1557 -
1558 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1559 -- Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
1560 -- Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1561 -- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
1562 -{{/expandable}}
1563 -
1564 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1565 -1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
1566 -2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1567 -3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1568 -{{/expandable}}
1569 -
1570 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1571 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
1572 -{{/expandable}}
1573 -{{/expandable}}
1574 -
1575 -{{expandable summary="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
1576 -**Source:** *Politics & Policy*
1577 -**Date of Publication:** *2007*
1578 -**Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
1579 -**Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
1580 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
1581 -**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*
1582 -
1583 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1584 -1. **General Observations:**
1585 - - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
1586 - - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
1587 -
1588 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1589 - - **Equality-based framing decreases opposition** to same-sex marriage.
1590 - - **Morality-based framing increases opposition** to same-sex marriage.
1591 -
1592 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1593 - - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
1594 - - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
1595 -{{/expandable}}
1596 -
1597 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1598 -1. **Primary Observations:**
1599 - - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
1600 - - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
1601 -
1602 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1603 - - **Religious and conservative audiences** respond more to morality-based framing.
1604 - - **Younger and progressive audiences** respond more to equality-based framing.
1605 -
1606 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1607 - - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
1608 - - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
1609 -{{/expandable}}
1610 -
1611 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1612 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1613 - - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
1614 - - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
1615 -
1616 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1617 - - Focuses **only on U.S. media coverage**, limiting global applicability.
1618 - - Does not account for **social media's growing influence** on public opinion.
1619 -
1620 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1621 - - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
1622 - - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
1623 -{{/expandable}}
1624 -
1625 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1626 -- Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
1627 -- Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
1628 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.
1629 -{{/expandable}}
1630 -
1631 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1632 -1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
1633 -2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
1634 -3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
1635 -{{/expandable}}
1636 -
1637 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1638 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]
1639 -{{/expandable}}
1640 -{{/expandable}}
1641 -
1642 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
1643 -**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
1644 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1645 -**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
1646 -**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
1647 -**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
1648 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*
1649 -
1650 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1651 -1. **General Observations:**
1652 - - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
1653 - - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
1654 -
1655 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1656 - - **Video-based content was 2x more persuasive** than text-based content.
1657 - - Participants **under age 35 were more susceptible to political messaging shifts**.
1658 -
1659 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1660 - - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
1661 - - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
1662 -{{/expandable}}
1663 -
1664 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1665 -1. **Primary Observations:**
1666 - - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
1667 - - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
1668 -
1669 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1670 - - **Social media platforms had stronger persuasive effects** than news websites.
1671 - - Participants who engaged in **online discussions retained more political knowledge**.
1672 -
1673 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1674 - - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
1675 - - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
1676 -{{/expandable}}
1677 -
1678 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1679 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1680 - - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
1681 - - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
1682 -
1683 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1684 - - Limited to **short-term persuasion effects**, without long-term follow-up.
1685 - - Does not explore **the role of misinformation in political persuasion**.
1686 -
1687 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1688 - - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
1689 - - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
1690 -{{/expandable}}
1691 -
1692 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1693 -- Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
1694 -- Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
1695 -- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
1696 -{{/expandable}}
1697 -
1698 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1699 -1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
1700 -2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
1701 -3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
1702 -{{/expandable}}
1703 -
1704 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1705 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
1706 -##~{~{/expand}}##
1707 -{{/expandable}}
1708 -{{/expandable}}
Cultural Voyeurism A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Intera.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -103.1 KB
Content