0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 97.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/04/16 01:39
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 72.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 05:13
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,619 +1,554 @@
1 1  = Research at a Glance =
2 2  
3 +== Introduction ==
3 3  
5 +Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various fields such as **social psychology, public policy, behavioral economics, and more**. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout.
4 4  
5 - Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various important Racial themes. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout. I wanted to make this for a couple of reasons. Number one is organization. There are a ton of useful studies out there that expose the truth, sometimes inadvertently. You'll notice that in this initial draft the summaries are often woke and reflect the bias of the AI writing them as well as the researchers politically correct conclusion in most cases. That's because I haven't gotten to going through and pointing out the reasons I put all of them in here.
7 +=== How to Use This Repository ===
6 6  
9 +- Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
10 +- Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
11 +- Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
12 +- If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
7 7  
8 - There is often an underlying hypocrisy or double standard, saying the quiet part out loud, or conclusions that are so much of an antithesis to what the data shows that made me want to include it. At least, thats the idea for once its polished. I have about 150 more studies to upload, so it will be a few weeks before I get through it all. Until such time, feel free to search for them yourself and edit in what you find, or add your own studies. If you like you can do it manually, or if you'd rather go the route I did, just rename the study to its doi number and feed the study into an AI and tell them to summarize the study using the following format:
14 +{{toc/}}
9 9  
10 -{{example}}
11 -~= Study: [Study Title] =
16 +== Research Studies Repository ==
12 12  
13 -~{~{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
14 -~*~*Source:~*~* *[Journal/Institution Name]*
15 -~*~*Date of Publication:~*~* *[Publication Date]*
16 -~*~*Author(s):~*~* *[Author(s) Name(s)]*
17 -~*~*Title:~*~* *"[Study Title]"*
18 -~*~*DOI:~*~* [DOI or Link]
19 -~*~*Subject Matter:~*~* *[Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]*Β 
20 20  
21 -~-~--
19 += Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding =
20 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
21 +**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
22 +**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
23 +**Author(s):** Smith et al.
24 +**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
25 +**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
26 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
22 22  
23 -~#~# ~*~*Key Statistics~*~*
24 -~1. ~*~*General Observations:~*~*
28 +**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
29 +
30 +=== **Key Statistics** ===
31 +
32 +1. **General Observations:**
33 + - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
34 + - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
35 +
36 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
37 + - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
38 + - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
39 +
40 +=== **Findings** ===
41 +
42 +- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
43 +- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
44 +
45 +=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
46 +
47 +- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
48 +- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
49 +{{/expand}}
50 +
51 +{{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
52 +**Source:** [Journal/Institution Name]
53 +**Date of Publication:** [Publication Date]
54 +**Author(s):** [Author(s) Name(s)]
55 +**Title:** "[Study Title]"
56 +**DOI:** [DOI or Link]
57 +**Subject Matter:** [Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]
58 +
59 +---
60 +
61 +## **Key Statistics**
62 +1. **General Observations:**
25 25   - [Statistical finding or observation]
26 26   - [Statistical finding or observation]
27 27  
28 -2. ~*~*Subgroup Analysis:~*~*
66 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
29 29   - [Breakdown of findings by gender, race, or other subgroups]
30 30  
31 -3. ~*~*Other Significant Data Points:~*~*
69 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
32 32   - [Any additional findings or significant statistics]
33 33  
34 -~-~--
72 +---
35 35  
36 -~#~# ~*~*Findings~*~*
37 -~1. ~*~*Primary Observations:~*~*
74 +## **Findings**
75 +1. **Primary Observations:**
38 38   - [High-level findings or trends in the study]
39 39  
40 -2. ~*~*Subgroup Trends:~*~*
78 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
41 41   - [Disparities or differences highlighted in the study]
42 42  
43 -3. ~*~*Specific Case Analysis:~*~*
81 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
44 44   - [Detailed explanation of any notable specific findings]
45 45  
46 -~-~--
84 +---
47 47  
48 -~#~# ~*~*Critique and Observations~*~*
49 -~1. ~*~*Strengths of the Study:~*~*
86 +## **Critique and Observations**
87 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
50 50   - [Examples: strong methodology, large dataset, etc.]
51 51  
52 -2. ~*~*Limitations of the Study:~*~*
90 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
53 53   - [Examples: data gaps, lack of upstream analysis, etc.]
54 54  
55 -3. ~*~*Suggestions for Improvement:~*~*
93 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
56 56   - [Ideas for further research or addressing limitations]
57 57  
58 -~-~--
96 +---
59 59  
60 -~#~# ~*~*Relevance to Subproject~*~*
98 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
61 61  - [Explanation of how this study contributes to your subproject goals.]
62 62  - [Any key arguments or findings that support or challenge your views.]
63 63  
64 -~-~--
102 +---
65 65  
66 -~#~# ~*~*Suggestions for Further Exploration~*~*
67 -~1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
104 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
105 +1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
68 68  2. [Potential studies or sources to complement this analysis.]
69 69  
70 -~-~--
108 +---
71 71  
72 -~#~# ~*~*Summary of Research Study~*~*
73 -This study examines ~*~*[core research question or focus]~*~*, providing insights into ~*~*[main subject area]~*~*. The research utilized ~*~*[sample size and methodology]~*~* to assess ~*~*[key variables or measured outcomes]~*~*.Β 
110 +## **Summary of Research Study**
111 +This study examines **[core research question or focus]**, providing insights into **[main subject area]**. The research utilized **[sample size and methodology]** to assess **[key variables or measured outcomes]**.
74 74  
75 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
113 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
76 76  
77 -~-~--
115 +---
78 78  
79 -~#~# ~*~*πŸ“„ Download Full Study~*~*
80 -~{~{velocity}}
81 -#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
82 -#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
83 -#if($xwiki.exists("attach~:$filename"))
84 -~[~[Download Full Study>>attach~:$filename]]
85 -#else
86 -~{~{html}}<span style="color:red; font-weight:bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>~{~{/html}}
87 -#end
88 -~{~{/velocity}}
117 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
118 +{{velocity}}
119 +#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
120 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
121 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
122 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
123 +#else
124 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
125 +#end
126 +{{/velocity}}
89 89  
90 -~{~{/expand}}
128 +{{/expand}}
91 91  
92 -
93 -{{/example}}
130 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
94 94  
95 95  
96 96  
97 -- Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
98 -- Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
99 -- Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
100 -- If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
101 -- You'll also find a download link to the original full study in pdf form at the bottom of the collapsible block.
134 +---
102 102  
136 +{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}}
137 +**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
138 +**Date of Publication:** *2020*
139 +**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
140 +**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
141 +**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
142 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*
103 103  
104 -{{toc/}}
144 +---
105 105  
106 -
107 -
108 -
109 -
110 -= Genetics =
111 -
112 -
113 -{{expandable summary="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
114 -**Source:** *Nature*
115 -**Date of Publication:** *2009*
116 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
117 -**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
118 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
119 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*Β 
120 -
121 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
146 +## **Key Statistics**
122 122  1. **General Observations:**
123 - - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
124 - - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
148 + - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
149 + - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
125 125  
126 126  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
127 - - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
128 - - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
152 + - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
153 + - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
129 129  
130 130  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
131 - - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
132 - - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
133 -{{/expandable}}
156 + - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
157 + - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
134 134  
135 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
159 +---
160 +
161 +## **Findings**
136 136  1. **Primary Observations:**
137 - - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
138 - - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
163 + - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
164 + - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
139 139  
140 140  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
141 - - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
142 - - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
167 + - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
168 + - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
143 143  
144 144  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
145 - - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
146 - - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
147 -{{/expandable}}
171 + - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
172 + - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
148 148  
149 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
174 +---
175 +
176 +## **Critique and Observations**
150 150  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
151 - - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
152 - - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
178 + - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
179 + - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
153 153  
154 154  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
155 - - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
156 - - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
182 + - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
183 + - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
157 157  
158 158  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
159 - - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
160 - - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
161 -{{/expandable}}
186 + - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
187 + - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
162 162  
163 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
164 -- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
165 -- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
166 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
167 -{{/expandable}}
189 +---
168 168  
169 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
170 -1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
171 -2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
172 -3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
173 -{{/expandable}}
191 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
192 +- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
193 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
174 174  
175 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
176 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
177 -##
178 - ##
179 -{{/expandable}}
180 -{{/expandable}}
195 +---
181 181  
182 -{{expandable summary="
197 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
198 +1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
199 +2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
183 183  
201 +---
184 184  
185 -Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
186 -**Source:** *Nature*
187 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
188 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
189 -**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
190 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
191 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*Β 
203 +## **Summary of Research Study**
204 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.
192 192  
193 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
194 -1. **General Observations:**
195 - - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
196 - - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
206 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
197 197  
198 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
199 - - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
200 - - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
208 +---
201 201  
202 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
203 - - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
204 - - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
205 -{{/expandable}}
210 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
211 +{{velocity}}
212 +#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
213 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
214 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
215 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
216 +#else
217 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
218 +#end
219 +{{/velocity}}
206 206  
207 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
208 -1. **Primary Observations:**
209 - - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
210 - - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
221 +{{/expand}}
211 211  
212 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
213 - - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
214 - - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
223 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
215 215  
216 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
217 - - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
218 - - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
219 -{{/expandable}}
220 220  
221 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
222 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
223 - - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
224 - - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
226 +{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}}
227 +**Source:** *Current Psychology*
228 +**Date of Publication:** *2024*
229 +**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
230 +**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
231 +**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
232 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
225 225  
226 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
227 - - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
228 - - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
234 +---
229 229  
230 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
231 - - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
232 - - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
233 -{{/expandable}}
234 -
235 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
236 -- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
237 -- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
238 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
239 -{{/expandable}}
240 -
241 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
242 -1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
243 -2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
244 -3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
245 -{{/expandable}}
246 -
247 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
248 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
249 -##
250 - ##
251 -{{/expandable}}
252 -{{/expandable}}
253 -
254 -{{expandable summary="
255 -
256 -
257 -Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
258 -**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
259 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
260 -**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
261 -**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
262 -**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
263 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*Β 
264 -
265 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
236 +## **Key Statistics**
266 266  1. **General Observations:**
267 - - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
268 - - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
238 + - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
239 + - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
269 269  
270 270  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
271 - - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
272 - - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
242 + - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
243 + - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
273 273  
274 274  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
275 - - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
276 - - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
277 -{{/expandable}}
246 + - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
247 + - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
278 278  
279 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
249 +---
250 +
251 +## **Findings**
280 280  1. **Primary Observations:**
281 - - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
282 - - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
253 + - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
254 + - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
283 283  
284 284  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
285 - - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (70-80%)**.
286 - - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
257 + - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
258 + - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
287 287  
288 288  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
289 - - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
290 - - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
291 -{{/expandable}}
261 + - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
262 + - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
292 292  
293 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
264 +---
265 +
266 +## **Critique and Observations**
294 294  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
295 - - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
296 - - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
268 + - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
269 + - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
297 297  
298 298  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
299 - - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
300 - - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
272 + - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
273 + - **No causal conclusions**β€”correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
301 301  
302 302  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
303 - - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
304 - - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
305 -{{/expandable}}
276 + - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
277 + - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
306 306  
307 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
308 -- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
309 -- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
310 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
311 -{{/expandable}}
279 +---
312 312  
313 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
314 -1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
315 -2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
316 -3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
317 -{{/expandable}}
281 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
282 +- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
283 +- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
284 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
318 318  
319 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
320 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
321 -{{/expandable}}
322 -{{/expandable}}
286 +---
323 323  
324 -{{expandable summary="
288 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
289 +1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
290 +2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
291 +3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
325 325  
293 +---
326 326  
327 -Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
328 -**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
329 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
330 -**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
331 -**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
332 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
333 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*Β 
295 +## **Summary of Research Study**
296 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.
334 334  
335 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
336 -1. **General Observations:**
337 - - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
338 - - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
298 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
339 339  
340 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
341 - - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
342 - - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
300 +---
343 343  
344 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
345 - - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
346 - - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
347 -{{/expandable}}
302 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
303 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
348 348  
349 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
350 -1. **Primary Observations:**
351 - - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
352 - - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
305 +{{/expand}}
353 353  
354 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
355 - - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
356 - - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
307 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
357 357  
358 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
359 - - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
360 - - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
361 -{{/expandable}}
309 +{{expand title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" expanded="false"}} Source: Addictive Behaviors
310 +Date of Publication: 2016
311 +Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
312 +Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
313 +DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
314 +Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
362 362  
363 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
364 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
365 - - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
366 - - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
316 +Key Statistics
317 +General Observations:
367 367  
368 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
369 - - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
370 - - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
319 +Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
320 +Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
321 +Subgroup Analysis:
371 371  
372 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
373 - - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
374 - - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
375 -{{/expandable}}
323 +Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
324 +Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
325 +Other Significant Data Points:
376 376  
377 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
378 -- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
379 -- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
380 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
381 -{{/expandable}}
327 +Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
328 +Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
329 +Findings
330 +Primary Observations:
382 382  
383 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
384 -1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
385 -2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
386 -3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
387 -{{/expandable}}
332 +Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
333 +Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
334 +Subgroup Trends:
388 388  
389 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
390 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
391 -{{/expandable}}
392 -{{/expandable}}
336 +Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
337 +College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
338 +Specific Case Analysis:
393 393  
394 -{{expandable summary="
340 +Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
341 +Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
342 +Critique and Observations
343 +Strengths of the Study:
395 395  
345 +Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
346 +Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
347 +Limitations of the Study:
396 396  
397 -Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
398 -**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
399 -**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
400 -**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
401 -**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
402 -**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
403 -**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*Β 
349 +Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
350 +Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
351 +Suggestions for Improvement:
404 404  
405 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
406 -1. **General Observations:**
407 - - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
408 - - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
353 +Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
354 +Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
355 +Relevance to Subproject
356 +Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
357 +Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
358 +Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
359 +Suggestions for Further Exploration
360 +Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
361 +Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
362 +Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
363 +Summary of Research Study
364 +This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
409 409  
410 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
411 - - Examines **West Eurasian populations** and their genetic evolution.
412 - - Tracks **changes in allele frequencies over millennia**.
366 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
413 413  
414 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
415 - - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
416 - - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
417 -{{/expandable}}
368 +πŸ“„ Download Full Study
369 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
418 418  
419 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
420 -1. **Primary Observations:**
421 - - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
422 - - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
371 +{{/expand}}
423 423  
424 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
425 - - Selection pressure on **energy storage genes** supports the **Thrifty Gene Hypothesis**.
426 - - **Cognitive performance-related alleles** have undergone selection, but their historical advantages remain unclear.
373 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
427 427  
428 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
429 - - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
430 - - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
431 - - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
432 -{{/expandable}}
375 +{{expand title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?" expanded="false"}}
376 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
377 +**Date of Publication:** *2014*
378 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
379 +**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
380 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
381 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
433 433  
434 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
435 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
436 - - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
437 - - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
383 +---
438 438  
439 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
440 - - Findings **may not translate directly** to modern populations.
441 - - **Unclear whether observed selection pressures persist today**.
442 -
443 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
444 - - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
445 - - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
446 -{{/expandable}}
447 -
448 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
449 -- Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
450 -- Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
451 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.
452 -{{/expandable}}
453 -
454 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
455 -1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
456 -2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
457 -3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
458 -{{/expandable}}
459 -
460 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
461 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]
462 -{{/expandable}}
463 -{{/expandable}}
464 -
465 -{{expandable summary="
466 -
467 -
468 -Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
469 -**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
470 -**Date of Publication:** *2013*
471 -**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
472 -**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
473 -**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
474 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*Β 
475 -
476 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
385 +## **Key Statistics**
477 477  1. **General Observations:**
478 - - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
479 - - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
387 + - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
388 + - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
480 480  
481 481  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
482 - - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
483 - - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
391 + - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
392 + - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
484 484  
485 485  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
486 - - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
487 - - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
488 -{{/expandable}}
395 + - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
396 + - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
489 489  
490 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
398 +---
399 +
400 +## **Findings**
491 491  1. **Primary Observations:**
492 - - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
493 - - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
402 + - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
403 + - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
494 494  
495 495  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
496 - - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
497 - - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
406 + - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
407 + - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
498 498  
499 499  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
500 - - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
501 - - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
502 -{{/expandable}}
410 + - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
411 + - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
503 503  
504 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
413 +---
414 +
415 +## **Critique and Observations**
505 505  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
506 - - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
507 - - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
417 + - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
418 + - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
508 508  
509 509  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
510 - - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
511 - - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
421 + - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
422 + - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
512 512  
513 513  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
514 - - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
515 - - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
516 -{{/expandable}}
425 + - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
426 + - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
517 517  
518 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
519 -- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
520 -- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
521 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
522 -{{/expandable}}
428 +---
523 523  
524 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
525 -1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
526 -2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
527 -3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
528 -{{/expandable}}
430 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
431 +- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
432 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
433 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
529 529  
530 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
531 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
532 -{{/expandable}}
533 -{{/expandable}}
435 +---
534 534  
535 -{{expandable summary="
437 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
438 +1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
439 +2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
440 +3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
536 536  
442 +---
537 537  
538 -Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
539 -**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
540 -**Date of Publication:** *2010*
541 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
542 -**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
543 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
544 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*Β 
444 +## **Summary of Research Study**
445 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.
545 545  
546 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
447 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
448 +
449 +---
450 +
451 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
452 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
453 +
454 +{{/expand}}
455 +
456 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
457 +
458 +{{expand title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation" expanded="false"}}
459 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
460 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
461 +**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
462 +**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
463 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
464 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
465 +
466 +---
467 +
468 +## **Key Statistics**
547 547  1. **General Observations:**
548 - - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
549 - - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
470 + - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
471 + - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
550 550  
551 551  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
552 - - Discusses **four primary definitions of race/subspecies**: Essentialist, Taxonomic, Population-based, and Lineage-based.
553 - - Suggests that **human heterozygosity levels are comparable to species that are classified as polytypic**.
474 + - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
475 + - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
554 554  
555 555  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
556 - - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
557 - - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
558 -{{/expandable}}
478 + - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
479 + - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
559 559  
560 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
481 +---
482 +
483 +## **Findings**
561 561  1. **Primary Observations:**
562 - - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
563 - - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
485 + - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
486 + - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
564 564  
565 565  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
566 - - Discusses **how race concepts evolved over time** in biological sciences.
567 - - Compares **human diversity with that of other primates** such as chimpanzees and gorillas.
489 + - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
490 + - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
568 568  
569 569  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
570 - - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
571 - - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
572 -{{/expandable}}
493 + - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
494 + - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
573 573  
574 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
496 +---
497 +
498 +## **Critique and Observations**
575 575  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
576 - - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
577 - - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
500 + - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
501 + - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
578 578  
579 579  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
580 - - Controversial topic with **strong opposing views in anthropology and genetics**.
581 - - **Relies on broad genetic trends**, but does not analyze individual-level genetic variation in depth.
504 + - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
505 + - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**β€”future studies may identify more.
582 582  
583 583  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
584 - - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
585 - - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
586 -{{/expandable}}
508 + - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
509 + - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
587 587  
588 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
589 -- Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
590 -- Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
591 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
592 -{{/expandable}}
511 +---
593 593  
594 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
595 -1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
596 -2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
597 -3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
598 -{{/expandable}}
513 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
514 +- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
515 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
516 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
599 599  
600 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
601 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
602 -{{/expandable}}
603 -{{/expandable}}
518 +---
604 604  
605 -{{expandable summary="
520 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
521 +1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
522 +2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
523 +3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
606 606  
525 +---
607 607  
608 -Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
527 +## **Summary of Research Study**
528 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.
529 +
530 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
531 +
532 +---
533 +
534 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
535 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
536 +
537 +{{/expand}}
538 +
539 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
540 +
541 +{{expand title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media" expanded="false"}}
609 609  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
610 610  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
611 611  **Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
612 612  **Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
613 613  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
614 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*Β 
547 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
615 615  
616 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
549 +---
550 +
551 +## **Key Statistics**
617 617  1. **General Observations:**
618 618   - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
619 619   - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
... ... @@ -625,9 +625,10 @@
625 625  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
626 626   - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
627 627   - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
628 -{{/expandable}}
629 629  
630 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
564 +---
565 +
566 +## **Findings**
631 631  1. **Primary Observations:**
632 632   - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
633 633   - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
... ... @@ -639,9 +639,10 @@
639 639  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
640 640   - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
641 641   - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
642 -{{/expandable}}
643 643  
644 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
579 +---
580 +
581 +## **Critique and Observations**
645 645  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
646 646   - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
647 647   - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
... ... @@ -653,692 +653,632 @@
653 653  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
654 654   - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
655 655   - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
656 -{{/expandable}}
657 657  
658 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
594 +---
595 +
596 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
659 659  - Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
660 660  - Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
661 661  - Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
662 -{{/expandable}}
663 663  
664 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
601 +---
602 +
603 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
665 665  1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
666 666  2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
667 667  3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
668 -{{/expandable}}
669 669  
670 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
608 +---
609 +
610 +## **Summary of Research Study**
611 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.
612 +
613 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
614 +
615 +---
616 +
617 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
671 671  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
672 -{{/expandable}}
673 -{{/expandable}}
674 674  
675 -{{expandable summary="
620 +{{/expand}}
676 676  
622 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
677 677  
678 -Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
679 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
680 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
681 -**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
682 -**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
683 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
684 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*Β 
624 +{{expand title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications" expanded="false"}}
625 +**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
626 +**Date of Publication:** *2010*
627 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
628 +**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
629 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
630 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
685 685  
686 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
632 +---
633 +
634 +## **Key Statistics**
687 687  1. **General Observations:**
688 - - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
689 - - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
636 + - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
637 + - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
690 690  
691 691  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
692 - - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
693 - - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
640 + - Discusses **four primary definitions of race/subspecies**: Essentialist, Taxonomic, Population-based, and Lineage-based.
641 + - Suggests that **human heterozygosity levels are comparable to species that are classified as polytypic**.
694 694  
695 695  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
696 - - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
697 - - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
698 -{{/expandable}}
644 + - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
645 + - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
699 699  
700 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
647 +---
648 +
649 +## **Findings**
701 701  1. **Primary Observations:**
702 - - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
703 - - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
651 + - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
652 + - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
704 704  
705 705  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
706 - - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
707 - - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
655 + - Discusses **how race concepts evolved over time** in biological sciences.
656 + - Compares **human diversity with that of other primates** such as chimpanzees and gorillas.
708 708  
709 709  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
710 - - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
711 - - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
712 -{{/expandable}}
659 + - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
660 + - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
713 713  
714 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
662 +---
663 +
664 +## **Critique and Observations**
715 715  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
716 - - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
717 - - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
666 + - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
667 + - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
718 718  
719 719  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
720 - - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
721 - - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**β€”future studies may identify more.
670 + - Controversial topic with **strong opposing views in anthropology and genetics**.
671 + - **Relies on broad genetic trends**, but does not analyze individual-level genetic variation in depth.
722 722  
723 723  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
724 - - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
725 - - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
726 -{{/expandable}}
674 + - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
675 + - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
727 727  
728 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
729 -- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
730 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
731 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
732 -{{/expandable}}
677 +---
733 733  
734 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
735 -1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
736 -2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
737 -3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
738 -{{/expandable}}
679 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
680 +- Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
681 +- Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
682 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
739 739  
740 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
741 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
742 -{{/expandable}}
743 -{{/expandable}}
684 +---
744 744  
745 -{{expandable summary="
686 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
687 +1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
688 +2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
689 +3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
746 746  
691 +---
747 747  
748 -Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding"}}
749 -**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
750 -**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
751 -**Author(s):** Smith et al.
752 -**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
753 -**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
754 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social ScienceΒ 
755 -{{/expandable}}
693 +## **Summary of Research Study**
694 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.
756 756  
757 -= Dating =
696 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
758 758  
759 -{{expandable summary="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
760 -**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
761 -**Date of Publication:** *2020*
762 -**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
763 -**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
764 -**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
765 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*Β 
698 +---
766 766  
767 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
700 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
701 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
702 +
703 +{{/expand}}
704 +
705 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
706 +
707 +{{expand title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age" expanded="false"}}
708 +**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
709 +**Date of Publication:** *2013*
710 +**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
711 +**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
712 +**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
713 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
714 +
715 +---
716 +
717 +## **Key Statistics**
768 768  1. **General Observations:**
769 - - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
770 - - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
719 + - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
720 + - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
771 771  
772 772  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
773 - - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
774 - - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
723 + - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
724 + - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
775 775  
776 776  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
777 - - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
778 - - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
779 -{{/expandable}}
727 + - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
728 + - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
780 780  
781 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
730 +---
731 +
732 +## **Findings**
782 782  1. **Primary Observations:**
783 - - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
784 - - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
734 + - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
735 + - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
785 785  
786 786  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
787 - - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
788 - - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
738 + - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
739 + - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
789 789  
790 790  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
791 - - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
792 - - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
793 -{{/expandable}}
742 + - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
743 + - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
794 794  
795 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
745 +---
746 +
747 +## **Critique and Observations**
796 796  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
797 - - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
798 - - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
749 + - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
750 + - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
799 799  
800 800  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
801 - - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
802 - - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
753 + - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
754 + - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
803 803  
804 804  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
805 - - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
806 - - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
807 -{{/expandable}}
757 + - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
758 + - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
808 808  
809 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
810 -- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
811 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
812 -{{/expandable}}
760 +---
813 813  
814 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
815 -1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
816 -2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
817 -{{/expandable}}
762 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
763 +- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
764 +- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
765 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
818 818  
819 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
767 +---
820 820  
821 -{{/expandable}}
822 -{{/expandable}}
769 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
770 +1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
771 +2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
772 +3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
823 823  
824 -{{expandable summary="
774 +---
825 825  
776 +## **Summary of Research Study**
777 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.
826 826  
827 -Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
828 -**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
829 -**Date of Publication:** *2012*
830 -**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
831 -**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
832 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
833 -**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*Β 
779 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
834 834  
835 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
836 -1. **General Observations:**
837 - - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
838 - - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
781 +---
839 839  
840 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
841 - - **Maternal race had a stronger influence than paternal race** on birth outcomes.
842 - - **Black mother–White father (BMWF) couples** had a higher risk than **White mother–Black father (WMBF) couples**.
783 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
784 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
843 843  
844 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
845 - - **Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for key outcomes:**
846 - - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
847 - - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
848 - - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
849 -{{/expandable}}
786 +{{/expand}}
850 850  
851 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
852 -1. **Primary Observations:**
853 - - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
854 - - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
788 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
855 855  
856 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
857 - - **Black mothers (regardless of paternal race) had the highest risk of LBW and PTB**.
858 - - **White mothers with Black fathers had a lower risk** than Black mothers with White fathers.
790 +{{expand title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports" expanded="false"}}
791 +**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
792 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
793 +**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
794 +**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
795 +**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
796 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
859 859  
860 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
861 - - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
862 - - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
863 -{{/expandable}}
798 +---
864 864  
865 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
866 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
867 - - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
868 - - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
869 -
870 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
871 - - Data limited to **Black-White biracial couples**, excluding other racial groups.
872 - - **Socioeconomic and healthcare access factors** not fully explored.
873 -
874 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
875 - - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
876 - - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
877 -{{/expandable}}
878 -
879 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
880 -- Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
881 -- Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
882 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.
883 -{{/expandable}}
884 -
885 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
886 -1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
887 -2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
888 -3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
889 -{{/expandable}}
890 -
891 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
892 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]
893 -{{/expandable}}
894 -{{/expandable}}
895 -
896 -{{expandable summary="
897 -
898 -
899 -Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
900 -**Source:** *Current Psychology*
901 -**Date of Publication:** *2024*
902 -**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
903 -**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
904 -**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
905 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*Β 
906 -
907 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
800 +## **Key Statistics**
908 908  1. **General Observations:**
909 - - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
910 - - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
802 + - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
803 + - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
911 911  
912 912  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
913 - - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
914 - - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
806 + - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
807 + - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
915 915  
916 916  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
917 - - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
918 - - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
919 -{{/expandable}}
810 + - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
811 + - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
920 920  
921 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
813 +---
814 +
815 +## **Findings**
922 922  1. **Primary Observations:**
923 - - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
924 - - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
817 + - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
818 + - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
925 925  
926 926  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
927 - - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
928 - - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
821 + - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
822 + - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
929 929  
930 930  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
931 - - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
932 - - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
933 -{{/expandable}}
825 + - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
826 + - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
934 934  
935 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
828 +---
829 +
830 +## **Critique and Observations**
936 936  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
937 - - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
938 - - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
832 + - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
833 + - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
939 939  
940 940  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
941 - - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
942 - - **No causal conclusions**β€”correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
836 + - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
837 + - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
943 943  
944 944  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
945 - - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
946 - - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
947 -{{/expandable}}
840 + - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
841 + - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
948 948  
949 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
950 -- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
951 -- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
952 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
953 -{{/expandable}}
843 +---
954 954  
955 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
956 -1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
957 -2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
958 -3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
959 -{{/expandable}}
845 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
846 +- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
847 +- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
848 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
960 960  
961 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
962 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
963 -{{/expandable}}
964 -
850 +---
965 965  
966 -= Crime and Substance Abuse =
967 -
968 -
969 -{{/expandable}}
852 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
853 +1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
854 +2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
855 +3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
970 970  
971 -{{expandable summary="
857 +---
972 972  
859 +## **Summary of Research Study**
860 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.
973 973  
974 -Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
975 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
976 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
977 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
978 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
979 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
980 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*Β 
862 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
981 981  
982 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
864 +---
865 +
866 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
867 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
868 +
869 +{{/expand}}
870 +
871 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
872 +
873 +{{expand title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History" expanded="false"}}
874 +**Source:** *Nature*
875 +**Date of Publication:** *2009*
876 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
877 +**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
878 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
879 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*
880 +
881 +---
882 +
883 +## **Key Statistics**
983 983  1. **General Observations:**
984 - - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
985 - - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
885 + - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
886 + - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
986 986  
987 987  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
988 - - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
989 - - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
889 + - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
890 + - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
990 990  
991 991  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
992 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
993 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
994 -{{/expandable}}
893 + - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
894 + - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
995 995  
996 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
896 +---
897 +
898 +## **Findings**
997 997  1. **Primary Observations:**
998 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
999 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
900 + - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
901 + - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
1000 1000  
1001 1001  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1002 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1003 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
904 + - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
905 + - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
1004 1004  
1005 1005  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1006 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1007 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1008 -{{/expandable}}
908 + - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
909 + - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
1009 1009  
1010 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
911 +---
912 +
913 +## **Critique and Observations**
1011 1011  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1012 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1013 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
915 + - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
916 + - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
1014 1014  
1015 1015  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1016 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1017 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
919 + - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
920 + - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
1018 1018  
1019 1019  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1020 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1021 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1022 -{{/expandable}}
923 + - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
924 + - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
1023 1023  
1024 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1025 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1026 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1027 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1028 -{{/expandable}}
926 +---
1029 1029  
1030 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1031 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1032 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1033 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1034 -{{/expandable}}
928 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
929 +- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
930 +- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
931 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
1035 1035  
1036 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1037 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1038 -{{/expandable}}
1039 -{{/expandable}}
933 +---
1040 1040  
1041 -{{expandable summary="
935 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
936 +1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
937 +2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
938 +3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
1042 1042  
940 +---
1043 1043  
1044 -Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1045 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1046 -**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1047 -**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1048 -**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1049 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1050 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*Β 
942 +## **Summary of Research Study**
943 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populationsβ€”**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.
1051 1051  
1052 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1053 -1. **General Observations:**
1054 - - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1055 - - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
945 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1056 1056  
1057 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1058 - - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1059 - - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
947 +---
1060 1060  
1061 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1062 - - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1063 - - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1064 -{{/expandable}}
949 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
950 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
1065 1065  
1066 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1067 -1. **Primary Observations:**
1068 - - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1069 - - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
952 +{{/expand}}
1070 1070  
1071 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1072 - - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1073 - - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
954 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1074 1074  
1075 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1076 - - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1077 - - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1078 -{{/expandable}}
1079 1079  
1080 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1081 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1082 - - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1083 - - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
957 +{{expand title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations" expanded="false"}}
958 +**Source:** *Nature*
959 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
960 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
961 +**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
962 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
963 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
1084 1084  
1085 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1086 - - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1087 - - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
965 +---
1088 1088  
1089 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1090 - - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1091 - - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1092 -{{/expandable}}
1093 -
1094 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1095 -- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1096 -- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1097 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1098 -{{/expandable}}
1099 -
1100 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1101 -1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1102 -2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1103 -3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1104 -{{/expandable}}
1105 -
1106 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1107 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1108 -{{/expandable}}
1109 -{{/expandable}}
1110 -
1111 -{{expandable summary="
1112 -
1113 -
1114 -Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1115 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1116 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1117 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1118 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1119 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1120 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*Β 
1121 -
1122 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
967 +## **Key Statistics**
1123 1123  1. **General Observations:**
1124 - - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1125 - - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
969 + - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
970 + - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
1126 1126  
1127 1127  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1128 - - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1129 - - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
973 + - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
974 + - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
1130 1130  
1131 1131  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1132 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1133 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1134 -{{/expandable}}
977 + - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
978 + - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
1135 1135  
1136 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
980 +---
981 +
982 +## **Findings**
1137 1137  1. **Primary Observations:**
1138 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1139 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
984 + - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
985 + - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
1140 1140  
1141 1141  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1142 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1143 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
988 + - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
989 + - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
1144 1144  
1145 1145  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1146 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1147 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1148 -{{/expandable}}
992 + - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
993 + - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
1149 1149  
1150 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
995 +---
996 +
997 +## **Critique and Observations**
1151 1151  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1152 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1153 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
999 + - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
1000 + - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
1154 1154  
1155 1155  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1156 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1157 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1003 + - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
1004 + - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
1158 1158  
1159 1159  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1160 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1161 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1162 -{{/expandable}}
1007 + - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
1008 + - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
1163 1163  
1164 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1165 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1166 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1167 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1168 -{{/expandable}}
1010 +---
1169 1169  
1170 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1171 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1172 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1173 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1174 -{{/expandable}}
1012 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1013 +- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
1014 +- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
1015 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
1175 1175  
1176 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1177 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1178 -{{/expandable}}
1179 -{{/expandable}}
1017 +---
1180 1180  
1181 -{{expandable summary="
1019 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1020 +1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
1021 +2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
1022 +3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
1182 1182  
1024 +---
1183 1183  
1184 -Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1185 -
1186 -{{/expandable}}
1026 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1027 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.
1187 1187  
1188 -{{expandable summary="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1189 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1190 -**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1191 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1192 -**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1193 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1194 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*Β 
1029 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1195 1195  
1196 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1031 +---
1032 +
1033 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
1034 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
1035 +
1036 +{{/expand}}
1037 +
1038 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1039 +
1040 +{{expand title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies" expanded="false"}}
1041 +**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
1042 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1043 +**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
1044 +**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
1045 +**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
1046 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
1047 +
1048 +---
1049 +
1050 +## **Key Statistics**
1197 1197  1. **General Observations:**
1198 - - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1199 - - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
1052 + - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
1053 + - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
1200 1200  
1201 1201  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1202 - - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
1203 - - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
1056 + - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
1057 + - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
1204 1204  
1205 1205  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1206 - - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1207 - - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1208 -{{/expandable}}
1060 + - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
1061 + - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
1209 1209  
1210 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1063 +---
1064 +
1065 +## **Findings**
1211 1211  1. **Primary Observations:**
1212 - - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1213 - - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
1067 + - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
1068 + - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
1214 1214  
1215 1215  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1216 - - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
1217 - - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
1071 + - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (~70-80%)**.
1072 + - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
1218 1218  
1219 1219  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1220 - - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1221 - - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1222 -{{/expandable}}
1075 + - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
1076 + - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
1223 1223  
1224 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1078 +---
1079 +
1080 +## **Critique and Observations**
1225 1225  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1226 - - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1227 - - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
1082 + - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
1083 + - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
1228 1228  
1229 1229  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1230 - - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
1231 - - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
1086 + - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
1087 + - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
1232 1232  
1233 1233  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1234 - - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1235 - - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1236 -{{/expandable}}
1090 + - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
1091 + - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
1237 1237  
1238 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1239 -- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1240 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1241 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
1242 -{{/expandable}}
1093 +---
1243 1243  
1244 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1245 -1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1246 -2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1247 -3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1248 -{{/expandable}}
1095 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1096 +- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
1097 +- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
1098 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
1249 1249  
1250 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1251 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
1252 -{{/expandable}}
1253 -
1100 +---
1254 1254  
1255 -= Whiteness & White Guilt =
1256 -
1257 -
1258 -{{/expandable}}
1102 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1103 +1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
1104 +2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
1105 +3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
1259 1259  
1260 -{{expandable summary="
1107 +---
1261 1261  
1109 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1110 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.
1262 1262  
1263 -Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1264 -**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1265 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1266 -**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1267 -**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1268 -**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1269 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*Β 
1112 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1270 1270  
1271 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1114 +---
1115 +
1116 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
1117 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
1118 +
1119 +{{/expand}}
1120 +
1121 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1122 +
1123 +{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}}
1124 +**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
1125 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1126 +**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
1127 +**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
1128 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
1129 +**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*
1130 +
1131 +---
1132 +
1133 +## **Key Statistics**
1272 1272  1. **General Observations:**
1273 - - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1274 - - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
1135 + - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
1136 + - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
1275 1275  
1276 1276  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1277 - - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
1278 - - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
1139 + - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
1140 + - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
1279 1279  
1280 1280  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1281 - - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1282 - - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1283 -{{/expandable}}
1143 + - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
1144 + - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
1284 1284  
1285 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1146 +---
1147 +
1148 +## **Findings**
1286 1286  1. **Primary Observations:**
1287 - - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1288 - - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
1150 + - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
1151 + - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
1289 1289  
1290 1290  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1291 - - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
1292 - - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
1154 + - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
1155 + - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
1293 1293  
1294 1294  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1295 - - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1296 - - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1297 -{{/expandable}}
1158 + - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
1159 + - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
1298 1298  
1299 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1161 +---
1162 +
1163 +## **Critique and Observations**
1300 1300  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1301 - - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1302 - - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
1165 + - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
1166 + - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
1303 1303  
1304 1304  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1305 - - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
1306 - - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
1169 + - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
1170 + - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
1307 1307  
1308 1308  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1309 - - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1310 - - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1311 -{{/expandable}}
1173 + - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
1174 + - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
1312 1312  
1313 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1314 -- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1315 -- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1316 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
1317 -{{/expandable}}
1176 +---
1318 1318  
1319 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1320 -1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1321 -2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1322 -3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1323 -{{/expandable}}
1178 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1179 +- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
1180 +- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
1181 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
1324 1324  
1325 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1326 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
1327 -{{/expandable}}
1328 -{{/expandable}}
1183 +---
1329 1329  
1330 -{{expandable summary="
1185 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1186 +1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
1187 +2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
1188 +3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
1331 1331  
1190 +---
1332 1332  
1333 -Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1192 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1193 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.
1194 +
1195 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1196 +
1197 +---
1198 +
1199 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
1200 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
1201 +
1202 +{{/expand}}
1203 +
1204 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1205 +
1206 +
1207 +
1208 +{{expand title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations" expanded="false"}}
1334 1334  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1335 1335  **Date of Publication:** *2016*
1336 1336  **Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1337 1337  **Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1338 1338  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1339 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*Β 
1214 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1340 1340  
1341 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1216 +---
1217 +
1218 +## **Key Statistics**
1342 1342  1. **General Observations:**
1343 1343   - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1344 1344   - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
... ... @@ -1350,9 +1350,10 @@
1350 1350  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1351 1351   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1352 1352   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1353 -{{/expandable}}
1354 1354  
1355 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1231 +---
1232 +
1233 +## **Findings**
1356 1356  1. **Primary Observations:**
1357 1357   - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1358 1358   - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
... ... @@ -1364,9 +1364,10 @@
1364 1364  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1365 1365   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1366 1366   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1367 -{{/expandable}}
1368 1368  
1369 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1246 +---
1247 +
1248 +## **Critique and Observations**
1370 1370  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1371 1371   - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1372 1372   - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
... ... @@ -1378,37 +1378,49 @@
1378 1378  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1379 1379   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1380 1380   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1381 -{{/expandable}}
1382 1382  
1383 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1261 +---
1262 +
1263 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1384 1384  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1385 1385  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1386 1386  - Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1387 -{{/expandable}}
1388 1388  
1389 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1268 +---
1269 +
1270 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1390 1390  1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1391 1391  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1392 1392  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1393 -{{/expandable}}
1394 1394  
1395 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1275 +---
1276 +
1277 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1278 +This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.
1279 +
1280 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1281 +
1282 +---
1283 +
1284 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
1396 1396  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1397 -{{/expandable}}
1398 -{{/expandable}}
1399 1399  
1400 -{{expandable summary="
1287 +{{/expand}}
1401 1401  
1289 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1402 1402  
1403 -Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1291 +
1292 +{{expand title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans" expanded="false"}}
1404 1404  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1405 1405  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
1406 1406  **Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1407 1407  **Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1408 1408  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1409 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*Β 
1298 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1410 1410  
1411 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1300 +---
1301 +
1302 +## **Key Statistics**
1412 1412  1. **General Observations:**
1413 1413   - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1414 1414   - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
... ... @@ -1420,9 +1420,10 @@
1420 1420  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1421 1421   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1422 1422   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1423 -{{/expandable}}
1424 1424  
1425 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1315 +---
1316 +
1317 +## **Findings**
1426 1426  1. **Primary Observations:**
1427 1427   - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1428 1428   - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
... ... @@ -1434,9 +1434,10 @@
1434 1434  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1435 1435   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1436 1436   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1437 -{{/expandable}}
1438 1438  
1439 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1330 +---
1331 +
1332 +## **Critique and Observations**
1440 1440  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1441 1441   - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1442 1442   - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
... ... @@ -1448,37 +1448,48 @@
1448 1448  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1449 1449   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1450 1450   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1451 -{{/expandable}}
1452 1452  
1453 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1345 +---
1346 +
1347 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1454 1454  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1455 1455  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1456 1456  - Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1457 -{{/expandable}}
1458 1458  
1459 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1352 +---
1353 +
1354 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1460 1460  1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1461 1461  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1462 1462  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1463 -{{/expandable}}
1464 1464  
1465 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1359 +---
1360 +
1361 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1362 +This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.
1363 +
1364 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1365 +
1366 +---
1367 +
1368 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
1466 1466  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1467 -{{/expandable}}
1468 -{{/expandable}}
1469 1469  
1470 -{{expandable summary="
1371 +{{/expand}}
1471 1471  
1373 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1472 1472  
1473 -Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1375 +{{expand title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?" expanded="false"}}
1474 1474  **Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1475 1475  **Date of Publication:** *2023*
1476 1476  **Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1477 1477  **Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1478 1478  **DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1479 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*Β 
1381 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1480 1480  
1481 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1383 +---
1384 +
1385 +## **Key Statistics**
1482 1482  1. **General Observations:**
1483 1483   - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1484 1484   - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
... ... @@ -1490,9 +1490,10 @@
1490 1490  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1491 1491   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1492 1492   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1493 -{{/expandable}}
1494 1494  
1495 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1398 +---
1399 +
1400 +## **Findings**
1496 1496  1. **Primary Observations:**
1497 1497   - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1498 1498   - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
... ... @@ -1504,9 +1504,10 @@
1504 1504  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1505 1505   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1506 1506   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1507 -{{/expandable}}
1508 1508  
1509 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1413 +---
1414 +
1415 +## **Critique and Observations**
1510 1510  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1511 1511   - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1512 1512   - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
... ... @@ -1518,236 +1518,367 @@
1518 1518  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1519 1519   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1520 1520   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1521 -{{/expandable}}
1522 1522  
1523 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1428 +---
1429 +
1430 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1524 1524  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1525 1525  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1526 1526  - Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1527 -{{/expandable}}
1528 1528  
1529 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1435 +---
1436 +
1437 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1530 1530  1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1531 1531  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1532 1532  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1533 -{{/expandable}}
1534 1534  
1535 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1442 +---
1443 +
1444 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1445 +This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.
1446 +
1447 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1448 +
1449 +---
1450 +
1451 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
1536 1536  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1537 -{{/expandable}}
1538 1538  
1539 -= Media =
1540 -
1541 -
1542 -{{/expandable}}
1454 +{{/expand}}
1543 1543  
1544 -{{expandable summary="
1456 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1545 1545  
1458 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1459 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1460 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1461 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1462 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1463 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1464 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1546 1546  
1547 -Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic"}}
1548 -**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1549 -**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1550 -**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1551 -**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1552 -**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1553 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*Β 
1466 +---
1554 1554  
1555 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1468 +## **Key Statistics**
1556 1556  1. **General Observations:**
1557 - - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1558 - - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
1470 + - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1471 + - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1559 1559  
1560 1560  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1561 - - **Anonymity and reduced social cues** in CMC increased hostility.
1562 - - **Echo chambers formed more frequently in algorithm-driven environments**.
1474 + - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1475 + - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1563 1563  
1564 1564  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1565 - - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1566 - - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1567 -{{/expandable}}
1478 + - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1479 + - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1568 1568  
1569 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1481 +---
1482 +
1483 +## **Findings**
1570 1570  1. **Primary Observations:**
1571 - - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1572 - - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
1485 + - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1486 + - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1573 1573  
1574 1574  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1575 - - Participants with **strong pre-existing biases became more polarized** after exposure to conflicting views.
1576 - - **Moderate users were more likely to disengage** from conflict-heavy discussions.
1489 + - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1490 + - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1577 1577  
1578 1578  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1579 - - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1580 - - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1581 -{{/expandable}}
1493 + - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1494 + - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1582 1582  
1583 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1496 +---
1497 +
1498 +## **Critique and Observations**
1584 1584  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1585 - - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1586 - - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
1500 + - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1501 + - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1587 1587  
1588 1588  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1589 - - Lacks **qualitative analysis of user motivations**.
1590 - - Focuses on **Western social media platforms**, missing global perspectives.
1504 + - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1505 + - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1591 1591  
1592 1592  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1593 - - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1594 - - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1595 -{{/expandable}}
1508 + - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1509 + - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1596 1596  
1597 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1598 -- Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
1599 -- Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1600 -- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
1601 -{{/expandable}}
1511 +---
1602 1602  
1603 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1604 -1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
1605 -2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1606 -3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1607 -{{/expandable}}
1513 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1514 +- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1515 +- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1516 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1608 1608  
1609 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1610 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
1611 -{{/expandable}}
1612 -{{/expandable}}
1518 +---
1613 1613  
1614 -{{expandable summary="
1520 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1521 +1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1522 +2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1523 +3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1615 1615  
1525 +---
1616 1616  
1617 -Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
1618 -**Source:** *Politics & Policy*
1619 -**Date of Publication:** *2007*
1620 -**Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
1621 -**Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
1622 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
1623 -**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*Β 
1527 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1528 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1624 1624  
1625 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1530 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1531 +
1532 +---
1533 +
1534 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
1535 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1536 +
1537 +{{/expand}}
1538 +
1539 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1540 +
1541 +
1542 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1543 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1544 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1545 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1546 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1547 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1548 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1549 +
1550 +---
1551 +
1552 +## **Key Statistics**
1626 1626  1. **General Observations:**
1627 - - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
1628 - - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
1554 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1555 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1629 1629  
1630 1630  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1631 - - **Equality-based framing decreases opposition** to same-sex marriage.
1632 - - **Morality-based framing increases opposition** to same-sex marriage.
1558 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1559 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1633 1633  
1634 1634  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1635 - - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
1636 - - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
1637 -{{/expandable}}
1562 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1563 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1638 1638  
1639 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1565 +---
1566 +
1567 +## **Findings**
1640 1640  1. **Primary Observations:**
1641 - - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
1642 - - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
1569 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1570 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1643 1643  
1644 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1645 - - **Religious and conservative audiences** respond more to morality-based framing.
1646 - - **Younger and progressive audiences** respond more to equality-based framing.
1572 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1573 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1574 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1647 1647  
1648 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1649 - - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
1650 - - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
1651 -{{/expandable}}
1576 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1577 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1578 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1652 1652  
1653 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1654 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1655 - - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
1656 - - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
1580 +---
1657 1657  
1658 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1659 - - Focuses **only on U.S. media coverage**, limiting global applicability.
1660 - - Does not account for **social media's growing influence** on public opinion.
1582 +## **Critique and Observations**
1583 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1584 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1585 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1661 1661  
1662 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1663 - - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
1664 - - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
1665 -{{/expandable}}
1587 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1588 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1589 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1666 1666  
1667 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1668 -- Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
1669 -- Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
1670 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.
1671 -{{/expandable}}
1591 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1592 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1593 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1672 1672  
1673 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1674 -1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
1675 -2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
1676 -3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
1677 -{{/expandable}}
1595 +---
1678 1678  
1679 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1680 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]
1681 -{{/expandable}}
1682 -{{/expandable}}
1597 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1598 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1599 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1600 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1683 1683  
1684 -{{expandable summary="
1602 +---
1685 1685  
1604 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1605 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1606 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1607 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1686 1686  
1687 -Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
1688 -**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
1689 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1690 -**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
1691 -**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
1692 -**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
1693 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*Β 
1609 +---
1694 1694  
1695 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1611 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1612 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1613 +
1614 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1615 +
1616 +---
1617 +
1618 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
1619 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1620 +
1621 +{{/expand}}
1622 +
1623 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1624 +
1625 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1626 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1627 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1628 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1629 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1630 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1631 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1632 +
1633 +---
1634 +
1635 +## **Key Statistics**
1696 1696  1. **General Observations:**
1697 - - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
1698 - - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
1637 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1638 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1699 1699  
1700 1700  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1701 - - **Video-based content was 2x more persuasive** than text-based content.
1702 - - Participants **under age 35 were more susceptible to political messaging shifts**.
1641 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1642 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1703 1703  
1704 1704  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1705 - - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
1706 - - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
1707 -{{/expandable}}
1645 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1646 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1708 1708  
1709 -{{expandable summary="πŸ”¬ Findings"}}
1648 +---
1649 +
1650 +## **Findings**
1710 1710  1. **Primary Observations:**
1711 - - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
1712 - - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
1652 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1653 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1713 1713  
1655 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1656 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1657 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1658 +
1659 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1660 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1661 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1662 +
1663 +---
1664 +
1665 +## **Critique and Observations**
1666 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1667 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1668 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1669 +
1670 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1671 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1672 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1673 +
1674 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1675 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1676 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1677 +
1678 +---
1679 +
1680 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1681 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1682 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1683 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1684 +
1685 +---
1686 +
1687 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1688 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1689 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1690 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1691 +
1692 +---
1693 +
1694 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1695 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1696 +
1697 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1698 +
1699 +---
1700 +
1701 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
1702 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1703 +
1704 +{{/expand}}
1705 +
1706 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1707 +
1708 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1709 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1710 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1711 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1712 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1713 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1714 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1715 +
1716 +---
1717 +
1718 +## **Key Statistics**
1719 +1. **General Observations:**
1720 + - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1721 + - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1722 +
1723 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1724 + - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1725 + - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1726 +
1727 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1728 + - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1729 + - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1730 +
1731 +---
1732 +
1733 +## **Findings**
1734 +1. **Primary Observations:**
1735 + - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1736 + - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1737 +
1714 1714  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1715 - - **Social media platforms had stronger persuasive effects** than news websites.
1716 - - Participants who engaged in **online discussions retained more political knowledge**.
1739 + - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1740 + - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1717 1717  
1718 1718  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1719 - - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
1720 - - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
1721 -{{/expandable}}
1743 + - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1744 + - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1722 1722  
1723 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1746 +---
1747 +
1748 +## **Critique and Observations**
1724 1724  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1725 - - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
1726 - - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
1750 + - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1751 + - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1727 1727  
1728 1728  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1729 - - Limited to **short-term persuasion effects**, without long-term follow-up.
1730 - - Does not explore **the role of misinformation in political persuasion**.
1754 + - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1755 + - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1731 1731  
1732 1732  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1733 - - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
1734 - - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
1735 -{{/expandable}}
1758 + - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1759 + - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1736 1736  
1737 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1738 -- Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
1739 -- Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
1740 -- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
1741 -{{/expandable}}
1761 +---
1742 1742  
1743 -{{expandable summary="πŸ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1744 -1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
1745 -2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
1746 -3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
1747 -{{/expandable}}
1763 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1764 +- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1765 +- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1766 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1748 1748  
1749 -{{expandable summary="πŸ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1750 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
1751 -##~{~{/expand}}##
1752 -{{/expandable}}
1753 -{{/expandable}}
1768 +---
1769 +
1770 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1771 +1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1772 +2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1773 +3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1774 +
1775 +---
1776 +
1777 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1778 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1779 +
1780 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1781 +
1782 +---
1783 +
1784 +## **πŸ“„ Download Full Study**
1785 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1786 +
1787 +{{/expand}}
1788 +
1789 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1790 +
Cultural Voyeurism A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Intera.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -103.1 KB
Content