0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 93.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/04/16 00:28
Change comment: Rollback to version 91.1
To version 74.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 05:23
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,660 +1,637 @@
1 1  = Research at a Glance =
2 2  
3 +== Introduction ==
3 3  
5 +Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various fields such as **social psychology, public policy, behavioral economics, and more**. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout.
4 4  
5 - Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various important Racial themes. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout. I wanted to make this for a couple of reasons. Number one is organization. There are a ton of useful studies out there that expose the truth, sometimes inadvertently. You'll notice that in this initial draft the summaries are often woke and reflect the bias of the AI writing them as well as the researchers politically correct conclusion in most cases. That's because I haven't gotten to going through and pointing out the reasons I put all of them in here.
7 +=== How to Use This Repository ===
6 6  
9 +- Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
10 +- Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
11 +- Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
12 +- If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
7 7  
8 - There is often an underlying hypocrisy or double standard, saying the quiet part out loud, or conclusions that are so much of an antithesis to what the data shows that made me want to include it. At least, thats the idea for once its polished. I have about 150 more studies to upload, so it will be a few weeks before I get through it all. Until such time, feel free to search for them yourself and edit in what you find, or add your own studies. If you like you can do it manually, or if you'd rather go the route I did, just rename the study to its doi number and feed the study into an AI and tell them to summarize the study using the following format:
14 +{{toc/}}
9 9  
10 -{{example}}
11 -~= Study: [Study Title] =
16 +== Research Studies Repository ==
12 12  
13 -~{~{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
14 -~*~*Source:~*~* *[Journal/Institution Name]*
15 -~*~*Date of Publication:~*~* *[Publication Date]*
16 -~*~*Author(s):~*~* *[Author(s) Name(s)]*
17 -~*~*Title:~*~* *"[Study Title]"*
18 -~*~*DOI:~*~* [DOI or Link]
19 -~*~*Subject Matter:~*~* *[Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]* 
20 20  
21 -~-~--
19 += Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding =
20 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
21 +**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
22 +**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
23 +**Author(s):** Smith et al.
24 +**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
25 +**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
26 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
22 22  
23 -~#~# ~*~*Key Statistics~*~*
24 -~1. ~*~*General Observations:~*~*
28 +**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
29 +
30 +=== **Key Statistics** ===
31 +
32 +1. **General Observations:**
33 + - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
34 + - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
35 +
36 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
37 + - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
38 + - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
39 +
40 +=== **Findings** ===
41 +
42 +- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
43 +- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
44 +
45 +=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
46 +
47 +- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
48 +- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
49 +{{/expand}}
50 +
51 +{{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
52 +**Source:** [Journal/Institution Name]
53 +**Date of Publication:** [Publication Date]
54 +**Author(s):** [Author(s) Name(s)]
55 +**Title:** "[Study Title]"
56 +**DOI:** [DOI or Link]
57 +**Subject Matter:** [Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]
58 +
59 +---
60 +
61 +## **Key Statistics**
62 +1. **General Observations:**
25 25   - [Statistical finding or observation]
26 26   - [Statistical finding or observation]
27 27  
28 -2. ~*~*Subgroup Analysis:~*~*
66 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
29 29   - [Breakdown of findings by gender, race, or other subgroups]
30 30  
31 -3. ~*~*Other Significant Data Points:~*~*
69 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
32 32   - [Any additional findings or significant statistics]
33 33  
34 -~-~--
72 +---
35 35  
36 -~#~# ~*~*Findings~*~*
37 -~1. ~*~*Primary Observations:~*~*
74 +## **Findings**
75 +1. **Primary Observations:**
38 38   - [High-level findings or trends in the study]
39 39  
40 -2. ~*~*Subgroup Trends:~*~*
78 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
41 41   - [Disparities or differences highlighted in the study]
42 42  
43 -3. ~*~*Specific Case Analysis:~*~*
81 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
44 44   - [Detailed explanation of any notable specific findings]
45 45  
46 -~-~--
84 +---
47 47  
48 -~#~# ~*~*Critique and Observations~*~*
49 -~1. ~*~*Strengths of the Study:~*~*
86 +## **Critique and Observations**
87 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
50 50   - [Examples: strong methodology, large dataset, etc.]
51 51  
52 -2. ~*~*Limitations of the Study:~*~*
90 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
53 53   - [Examples: data gaps, lack of upstream analysis, etc.]
54 54  
55 -3. ~*~*Suggestions for Improvement:~*~*
93 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
56 56   - [Ideas for further research or addressing limitations]
57 57  
58 -~-~--
96 +---
59 59  
60 -~#~# ~*~*Relevance to Subproject~*~*
98 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
61 61  - [Explanation of how this study contributes to your subproject goals.]
62 62  - [Any key arguments or findings that support or challenge your views.]
63 63  
64 -~-~--
102 +---
65 65  
66 -~#~# ~*~*Suggestions for Further Exploration~*~*
67 -~1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
104 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
105 +1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
68 68  2. [Potential studies or sources to complement this analysis.]
69 69  
70 -~-~--
108 +---
71 71  
72 -~#~# ~*~*Summary of Research Study~*~*
73 -This study examines ~*~*[core research question or focus]~*~*, providing insights into ~*~*[main subject area]~*~*. The research utilized ~*~*[sample size and methodology]~*~* to assess ~*~*[key variables or measured outcomes]~*~*. 
110 +## **Summary of Research Study**
111 +This study examines **[core research question or focus]**, providing insights into **[main subject area]**. The research utilized **[sample size and methodology]** to assess **[key variables or measured outcomes]**.
74 74  
75 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studys contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
113 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
76 76  
77 -~-~--
115 +---
78 78  
79 -~#~# ~*~*📄 Download Full Study~*~*
80 -~{~{velocity}}
81 -#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
82 -#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
83 -#if($xwiki.exists("attach~:$filename"))
84 -~[~[Download Full Study>>attach~:$filename]]
85 -#else
86 -~{~{html}}<span style="color:red; font-weight:bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>~{~{/html}}
87 -#end
88 -~{~{/velocity}}
117 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
118 +{{velocity}}
119 +#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
120 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
121 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
122 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
123 +#else
124 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
125 +#end
126 +{{/velocity}}
89 89  
90 -~{~{/expand}}
128 +{{/expand}}
91 91  
92 -
93 -{{/example}}
130 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
94 94  
95 95  
96 96  
97 -- Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
98 -- Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
99 -- Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
100 -- If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
101 -- You'll also find a download link to the original full study in pdf form at the bottom of the collapsible block.
134 +---
102 102  
136 +{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}}
137 +**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
138 +**Date of Publication:** *2020*
139 +**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
140 +**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
141 +**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
142 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*
103 103  
104 -{{toc/}}
144 +---
105 105  
106 -
107 -
108 -
109 -
110 -= Genetics =
111 -
112 -
113 -== Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History ==
114 -
115 -
116 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
117 -
118 -
119 -**Source:** *Nature*
120 -**Date of Publication:** *2009*
121 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
122 -**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
123 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
124 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
125 -
126 -----
127 -
128 -## **Key Statistics**##
129 -
146 +## **Key Statistics**
130 130  1. **General Observations:**
131 - - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
132 - - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
148 + - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
149 + - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
133 133  
134 134  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
135 - - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
136 - - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
152 + - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
153 + - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
137 137  
138 138  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
139 - - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
140 - - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
156 + - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
157 + - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
141 141  
142 -----
159 +---
143 143  
144 -## **Findings**##
145 -
161 +## **Findings**
146 146  1. **Primary Observations:**
147 - - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
148 - - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
163 + - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
164 + - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
149 149  
150 150  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
151 - - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
152 - - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
167 + - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
168 + - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
153 153  
154 154  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
155 - - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
156 - - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
171 + - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
172 + - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
157 157  
158 -----
174 +---
159 159  
160 -## **Critique and Observations**##
161 -
176 +## **Critique and Observations**
162 162  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
163 - - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
164 - - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
178 + - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
179 + - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
165 165  
166 166  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
167 - - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
168 - - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
182 + - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
183 + - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
169 169  
170 170  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
171 - - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
172 - - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
186 + - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
187 + - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
173 173  
174 -----
189 +---
175 175  
176 176  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
177 -- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
178 -- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
179 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
192 +- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
193 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
180 180  
181 -----
195 +---
182 182  
183 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
197 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
198 +1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
199 +2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
184 184  
185 -1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
186 -2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
187 -3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
201 +---
188 188  
189 -----
190 -
191 191  ## **Summary of Research Study**
192 -This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
204 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.
193 193  
194 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studys contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
206 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
195 195  
196 -----
208 +---
197 197  
198 198  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
199 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
200 -
201 -
202 -{{/expandable}}
211 +{{velocity}}
212 +#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
213 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
214 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
215 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
216 +#else
217 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
218 +#end
219 +{{/velocity}}
203 203  
221 +{{/expand}}
204 204  
205 -== Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations ==
223 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
206 206  
207 207  
208 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
209 -
210 -
211 -**Source:** *Nature*
212 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
213 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
214 -**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
215 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
216 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
226 +{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}}
227 +**Source:** *Current Psychology*
228 +**Date of Publication:** *2024*
229 +**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
230 +**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
231 +**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
232 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
217 217  
218 -----
234 +---
219 219  
220 -## **Key Statistics**##
221 -
236 +## **Key Statistics**
222 222  1. **General Observations:**
223 - - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
224 - - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
238 + - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
239 + - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
225 225  
226 226  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
227 - - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
228 - - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
242 + - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
243 + - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
229 229  
230 230  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
231 - - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
232 - - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
246 + - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
247 + - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
233 233  
234 -----
249 +---
235 235  
236 -## **Findings**##
237 -
251 +## **Findings**
238 238  1. **Primary Observations:**
239 - - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
240 - - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
253 + - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
254 + - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
241 241  
242 242  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
243 - - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
244 - - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
257 + - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
258 + - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
245 245  
246 246  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
247 - - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
248 - - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
261 + - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
262 + - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
249 249  
250 -----
264 +---
251 251  
252 -## **Critique and Observations**##
253 -
266 +## **Critique and Observations**
254 254  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
255 - - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
256 - - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
268 + - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
269 + - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
257 257  
258 258  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
259 - - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
260 - - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
272 + - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
273 + - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
261 261  
262 262  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
263 - - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
264 - - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
276 + - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
277 + - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
265 265  
266 -----
279 +---
267 267  
268 268  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
269 -- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
270 -- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
271 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
282 +- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
283 +- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
284 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
272 272  
273 -----
286 +---
274 274  
275 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
288 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
289 +1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
290 +2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
291 +3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
276 276  
277 -1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
278 -2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
279 -3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
293 +---
280 280  
281 -----
282 -
283 283  ## **Summary of Research Study**
284 -This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
296 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.
285 285  
286 286  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
287 287  
288 -----
300 +---
289 289  
290 290  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
291 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
292 -
293 -
294 -{{/expandable}}
303 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
295 295  
305 +{{/expand}}
296 296  
297 -== Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies ==
307 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
298 298  
299 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
300 -**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
301 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
302 -**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
303 -**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
304 -**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
305 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
309 +{{expand title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" expanded="false"}} Source: Addictive Behaviors
310 +Date of Publication: 2016
311 +Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
312 +Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
313 +DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
314 +Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
306 306  
307 -----
316 +Key Statistics
317 +General Observations:
308 308  
309 -## **Key Statistics**##
319 +Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
320 +Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
321 +Subgroup Analysis:
310 310  
311 -1. **General Observations:**
312 - - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
313 - - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
323 +Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
324 +Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
325 +Other Significant Data Points:
314 314  
315 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
316 - - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
317 - - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
327 +Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
328 +Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
329 +Findings
330 +Primary Observations:
318 318  
319 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
320 - - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
321 - - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
332 +Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
333 +Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
334 +Subgroup Trends:
322 322  
323 -----
336 +Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
337 +College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
338 +Specific Case Analysis:
324 324  
325 -## **Findings**##
340 +Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
341 +Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
342 +Critique and Observations
343 +Strengths of the Study:
326 326  
327 -1. **Primary Observations:**
328 - - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
329 - - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
345 +Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
346 +Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
347 +Limitations of the Study:
330 330  
331 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
332 - - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (70-80%)**.
333 - - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
349 +Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
350 +Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
351 +Suggestions for Improvement:
334 334  
335 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
336 - - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
337 - - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
353 +Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
354 +Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
355 +Relevance to Subproject
356 +Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
357 +Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
358 +Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
359 +Suggestions for Further Exploration
360 +Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
361 +Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
362 +Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
363 +Summary of Research Study
364 +This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
338 338  
339 -----
340 -
341 -## **Critique and Observations**##
342 -
343 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
344 - - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
345 - - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
346 -
347 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
348 - - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
349 - - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
350 -
351 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
352 - - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
353 - - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
354 -
355 -----
356 -
357 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
358 -- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
359 -- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
360 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
361 -
362 -----
363 -
364 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
365 -
366 -1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
367 -2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
368 -3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
369 -
370 -----
371 -
372 -## **Summary of Research Study**
373 -This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
374 -
375 375  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
376 376  
377 -----
368 +📄 Download Full Study
369 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
378 378  
379 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
380 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
381 -{{/expandable}}
371 +{{/expand}}
382 382  
373 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
383 383  
384 -== Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease ==
375 +{{expand title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?" expanded="false"}}
376 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
377 +**Date of Publication:** *2014*
378 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
379 +**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
380 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
381 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
385 385  
386 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
387 -**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
388 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
389 -**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
390 -**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
391 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
392 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
383 +---
393 393  
394 -----
395 -
396 -## **Key Statistics**##
397 -
385 +## **Key Statistics**
398 398  1. **General Observations:**
399 - - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
400 - - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
387 + - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
388 + - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
401 401  
402 402  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
403 - - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
404 - - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
391 + - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
392 + - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
405 405  
406 406  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
407 - - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
408 - - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
395 + - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
396 + - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
409 409  
410 -----
398 +---
411 411  
412 -## **Findings**##
413 -
400 +## **Findings**
414 414  1. **Primary Observations:**
415 - - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
416 - - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
402 + - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
403 + - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
417 417  
418 418  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
419 - - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
420 - - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
406 + - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
407 + - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
421 421  
422 422  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
423 - - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
424 - - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
410 + - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
411 + - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
425 425  
426 -----
413 +---
427 427  
428 -## **Critique and Observations**##
429 -
415 +## **Critique and Observations**
430 430  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
431 - - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
432 - - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
417 + - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
418 + - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
433 433  
434 434  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
435 - - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
436 - - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
421 + - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
422 + - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
437 437  
438 438  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
439 - - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
440 - - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
425 + - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
426 + - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
441 441  
442 -----
428 +---
443 443  
444 444  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
445 -- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
446 -- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
447 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
431 +- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
432 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
433 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
448 448  
449 -----
435 +---
450 450  
451 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
437 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
438 +1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
439 +2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
440 +3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
452 452  
453 -1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
454 -2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
455 -3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
442 +---
456 456  
457 -----
458 -
459 459  ## **Summary of Research Study**
460 -This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
445 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.
461 461  
462 462  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
463 463  
464 -----
449 +---
465 465  
466 466  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
467 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
468 -{{/expandable}}
452 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
469 469  
454 +{{/expand}}
470 470  
471 -== Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA ==
456 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
472 472  
473 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
474 -**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
475 -**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
476 -**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
477 -**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
478 -**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
479 -**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
458 +{{expand title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation" expanded="false"}}
459 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
460 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
461 +**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
462 +**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
463 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
464 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
480 480  
481 -----
466 +---
482 482  
483 -## **Key Statistics**##
484 -
468 +## **Key Statistics**
485 485  1. **General Observations:**
486 - - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
487 - - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
470 + - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
471 + - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
488 488  
489 489  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
490 - - Examines **West Eurasian populations** and their genetic evolution.
491 - - Tracks **changes in allele frequencies over millennia**.
474 + - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
475 + - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
492 492  
493 493  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
494 - - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
495 - - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
478 + - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
479 + - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
496 496  
497 -----
481 +---
498 498  
499 -## **Findings**##
500 -
483 +## **Findings**
501 501  1. **Primary Observations:**
502 - - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
503 - - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
485 + - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
486 + - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
504 504  
505 505  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
506 - - Selection pressure on **energy storage genes** supports the **Thrifty Gene Hypothesis**.
507 - - **Cognitive performance-related alleles** have undergone selection, but their historical advantages remain unclear.
489 + - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
490 + - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
508 508  
509 509  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
510 - - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
511 - - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
512 - - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
493 + - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
494 + - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
513 513  
514 -----
496 +---
515 515  
516 -## **Critique and Observations**##
517 -
498 +## **Critique and Observations**
518 518  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
519 - - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
520 - - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
500 + - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
501 + - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
521 521  
522 522  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
523 - - Findings **may not translate directly** to modern populations.
524 - - **Unclear whether observed selection pressures persist today**.
504 + - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
505 + - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
525 525  
526 526  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
527 - - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
528 - - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
508 + - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
509 + - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
529 529  
530 -----
511 +---
531 531  
532 532  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
533 -- Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
534 -- Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
535 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
514 +- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
515 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
516 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
536 536  
537 -----
518 +---
538 538  
539 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
520 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
521 +1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
522 +2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
523 +3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
540 540  
541 -1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
542 -2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
543 -3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
525 +---
544 544  
545 -----
546 -
547 547  ## **Summary of Research Study**
548 -This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
528 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.
549 549  
550 -----
530 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
551 551  
532 +---
533 +
552 552  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
553 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
554 -{{/expandable}}
535 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
555 555  
537 +{{/expand}}
556 556  
557 -== Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age ==
539 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
558 558  
559 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
560 -**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
561 -**Date of Publication:** *2013*
562 -**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
563 -**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
564 -**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
565 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
541 +{{expand title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media" expanded="false"}}
542 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
543 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
544 +**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
545 +**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
546 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
547 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
566 566  
567 -----
549 +---
568 568  
569 -## **Key Statistics**##
570 -
551 +## **Key Statistics**
571 571  1. **General Observations:**
572 - - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
573 - - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
553 + - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
554 + - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
574 574  
575 575  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
576 - - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
577 - - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
557 + - **90% of experts were from Western countries**, and **83% were male**.
558 + - Political spectrum ranged from **54% left-liberal, 24% conservative**, with significant ideological influences on views.
578 578  
579 579  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
580 - - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
581 - - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
561 + - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
562 + - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
582 582  
583 -----
564 +---
584 584  
585 -## **Findings**##
586 -
566 +## **Findings**
587 587  1. **Primary Observations:**
588 - - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
589 - - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
568 + - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
569 + - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
590 590  
591 591  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
592 - - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
593 - - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
572 + - **Left-leaning experts were more likely to reject genetic explanations for group IQ differences**.
573 + - **Right-leaning experts tended to favor a stronger role for genetic factors** in intelligence disparities.
594 594  
595 595  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
596 - - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
597 - - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
576 + - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
577 + - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
598 598  
599 -----
579 +---
600 600  
601 -## **Critique and Observations**##
602 -
581 +## **Critique and Observations**
603 603  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
604 - - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
605 - - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
583 + - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
584 + - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
606 606  
607 607  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
608 - - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
609 - - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
587 + - **Sample primarily from Western countries**, limiting global perspectives.
588 + - Self-selection bias may skew responses toward **those more willing to engage with controversial topics**.
610 610  
611 611  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
612 - - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
613 - - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
591 + - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
592 + - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
614 614  
615 -----
594 +---
616 616  
617 617  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
618 -- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
619 -- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
620 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
597 +- Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
598 +- Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
599 +- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
621 621  
622 -----
601 +---
623 623  
624 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
603 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
604 +1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
605 +2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
606 +3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
625 625  
626 -1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
627 -2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
628 -3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
608 +---
629 629  
630 -----
631 -
632 632  ## **Summary of Research Study**
633 -This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
611 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.
634 634  
635 635  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
636 636  
637 -----
615 +---
638 638  
639 639  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
640 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
641 -{{/expandable}}
618 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
642 642  
620 +{{/expand}}
643 643  
644 -== Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications ==
622 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
645 645  
646 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
624 +{{expand title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications" expanded="false"}}
647 647  **Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
648 648  **Date of Publication:** *2010*
649 649  **Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
650 650  **Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
651 651  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
652 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
630 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
653 653  
654 -----
632 +---
655 655  
656 -## **Key Statistics**##
657 -
634 +## **Key Statistics**
658 658  1. **General Observations:**
659 659   - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
660 660   - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
... ... @@ -667,10 +667,9 @@
667 667   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
668 668   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
669 669  
670 -----
647 +---
671 671  
672 -## **Findings**##
673 -
649 +## **Findings**
674 674  1. **Primary Observations:**
675 675   - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
676 676   - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
... ... @@ -683,10 +683,9 @@
683 683   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
684 684   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
685 685  
686 -----
662 +---
687 687  
688 -## **Critique and Observations**##
689 -
664 +## **Critique and Observations**
690 690  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
691 691   - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
692 692   - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
... ... @@ -699,1299 +699,1131 @@
699 699   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
700 700   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
701 701  
702 -----
677 +---
703 703  
704 704  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
705 705  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
706 706  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
707 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
682 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
708 708  
709 -----
684 +---
710 710  
711 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
712 -
686 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
713 713  1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
714 714  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
715 715  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
716 716  
717 -----
691 +---
718 718  
719 719  ## **Summary of Research Study**
720 -This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
694 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.
721 721  
722 722  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
723 723  
724 -----
698 +---
725 725  
726 726  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
727 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
728 -{{/expandable}}
701 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
729 729  
703 +{{/expand}}
730 730  
731 -== Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media ==
705 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
732 732  
733 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
734 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
735 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
736 -**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
737 -**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
738 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
739 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
707 +{{expand title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age" expanded="false"}}
708 +**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
709 +**Date of Publication:** *2013*
710 +**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
711 +**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
712 +**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
713 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
740 740  
741 -----
715 +---
742 742  
743 -## **Key Statistics**##
744 -
717 +## **Key Statistics**
745 745  1. **General Observations:**
746 - - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
747 - - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
719 + - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
720 + - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
748 748  
749 749  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
750 - - **90% of experts were from Western countries**, and **83% were male**.
751 - - Political spectrum ranged from **54% left-liberal, 24% conservative**, with significant ideological influences on views.
723 + - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
724 + - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
752 752  
753 753  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
754 - - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
755 - - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
727 + - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
728 + - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
756 756  
757 -----
730 +---
758 758  
759 -## **Findings**##
760 -
732 +## **Findings**
761 761  1. **Primary Observations:**
762 - - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
763 - - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
734 + - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
735 + - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
764 764  
765 765  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
766 - - **Left-leaning experts were more likely to reject genetic explanations for group IQ differences**.
767 - - **Right-leaning experts tended to favor a stronger role for genetic factors** in intelligence disparities.
738 + - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
739 + - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
768 768  
769 769  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
770 - - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
771 - - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
742 + - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
743 + - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
772 772  
773 -----
745 +---
774 774  
775 -## **Critique and Observations**##
776 -
747 +## **Critique and Observations**
777 777  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
778 - - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
779 - - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
749 + - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
750 + - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
780 780  
781 781  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
782 - - **Sample primarily from Western countries**, limiting global perspectives.
783 - - Self-selection bias may skew responses toward **those more willing to engage with controversial topics**.
753 + - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
754 + - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
784 784  
785 785  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
786 - - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
787 - - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
757 + - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
758 + - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
788 788  
789 -----
760 +---
790 790  
791 791  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
792 -- Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
793 -- Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
794 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
763 +- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
764 +- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
765 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
795 795  
796 -----
767 +---
797 797  
798 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
769 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
770 +1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
771 +2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
772 +3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
799 799  
800 -1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
801 -2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
802 -3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
774 +---
803 803  
804 -----
805 -
806 806  ## **Summary of Research Study**
807 -This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
777 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.
808 808  
809 809  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
810 810  
811 -----
781 +---
812 812  
813 813  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
814 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
815 -{{/expandable}}
784 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
816 816  
786 +{{/expand}}
817 817  
818 -== Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation ==
788 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
819 819  
820 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
821 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
822 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
823 -**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
824 -**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
825 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
826 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
790 +{{expand title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports" expanded="false"}}
791 +**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
792 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
793 +**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
794 +**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
795 +**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
796 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
827 827  
828 -----
798 +---
829 829  
830 -## **Key Statistics**##
831 -
800 +## **Key Statistics**
832 832  1. **General Observations:**
833 - - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
834 - - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
802 + - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
803 + - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
835 835  
836 836  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
837 - - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
838 - - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
806 + - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
807 + - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
839 839  
840 840  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
841 - - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
842 - - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
810 + - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
811 + - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
843 843  
844 -----
813 +---
845 845  
846 -## **Findings**##
847 -
815 +## **Findings**
848 848  1. **Primary Observations:**
849 - - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
850 - - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
817 + - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
818 + - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
851 851  
852 852  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
853 - - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
854 - - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
821 + - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
822 + - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
855 855  
856 856  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
857 - - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
858 - - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
825 + - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
826 + - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
859 859  
860 -----
828 +---
861 861  
862 -## **Critique and Observations**##
863 -
830 +## **Critique and Observations**
864 864  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
865 - - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
866 - - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
832 + - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
833 + - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
867 867  
868 868  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
869 - - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
870 - - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
836 + - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
837 + - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
871 871  
872 872  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
873 - - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
874 - - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
840 + - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
841 + - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
875 875  
876 -----
843 +---
877 877  
878 878  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
879 -- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
880 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
881 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
846 +- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
847 +- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
848 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
882 882  
883 -----
850 +---
884 884  
885 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
852 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
853 +1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
854 +2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
855 +3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
886 886  
887 -1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
888 -2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
889 -3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
857 +---
890 890  
891 -----
892 -
893 893  ## **Summary of Research Study**
894 -This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.  ##
860 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.
895 895  
896 896  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
897 897  
898 -----
864 +---
899 899  
900 900  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
901 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
902 -{{/expandable}}
867 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
903 903  
869 +{{/expand}}
904 904  
905 -== Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding ==
871 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
906 906  
907 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Click here to expand details"}}
908 -**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
909 -**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
910 -**Author(s):** Smith et al.
911 -**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
912 -**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
913 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science 
873 +{{expand title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History" expanded="false"}}
874 +**Source:** *Nature*
875 +**Date of Publication:** *2009*
876 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
877 +**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
878 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
879 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*
914 914  
915 -**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
881 +---
916 916  
917 - **Key Statistics**
918 -
883 +## **Key Statistics**
919 919  1. **General Observations:**
920 - - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
921 - - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
885 + - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
886 + - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
922 922  
923 923  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
924 - - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
925 - - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
889 + - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
890 + - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
926 926  
927 - **Findings**
928 -
929 -- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
930 -- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
931 -
932 - **Relevance to Subproject**
933 -
934 -- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
935 -- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
936 -{{/expandable}}
937 -
938 -
939 -----
940 -
941 -= Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
942 -
943 -
944 -== Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018 ==
945 -
946 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
947 -**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
948 -**Date of Publication:** *2020*
949 -**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
950 -**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
951 -**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
952 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
953 -
954 -----
955 -
956 -## **Key Statistics**##
957 -
958 -1. **General Observations:**
959 - - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
960 - - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
961 -
962 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
963 - - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
964 - - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
965 -
966 966  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
967 - - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
968 - - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
893 + - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
894 + - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
969 969  
970 -----
896 +---
971 971  
972 -## **Findings**##
973 -
898 +## **Findings**
974 974  1. **Primary Observations:**
975 - - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
976 - - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
900 + - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
901 + - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
977 977  
978 978  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
979 - - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
980 - - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
904 + - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
905 + - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
981 981  
982 982  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
983 - - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
984 - - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
908 + - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
909 + - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
985 985  
986 -----
911 +---
987 987  
988 -## **Critique and Observations**##
989 -
913 +## **Critique and Observations**
990 990  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
991 - - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
992 - - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
915 + - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
916 + - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
993 993  
994 994  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
995 - - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
996 - - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
919 + - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
920 + - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
997 997  
998 998  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
999 - - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
1000 - - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
923 + - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
924 + - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
1001 1001  
1002 -----
926 +---
1003 1003  
1004 1004  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1005 -- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
1006 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
929 +- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
930 +- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
931 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
1007 1007  
1008 -----
933 +---
1009 1009  
1010 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
935 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
936 +1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
937 +2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
938 +3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
1011 1011  
1012 -1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
1013 -2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
940 +---
1014 1014  
1015 -----
1016 -
1017 1017  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1018 -This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.  ##
943 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.
1019 1019  
1020 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
945 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studys contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1021 1021  
1022 -----
947 +---
1023 1023  
1024 1024  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1025 -{{velocity}}
1026 -#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
1027 -#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
1028 -#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
1029 -[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
1030 -#else
1031 -{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
1032 -#end {{/velocity}}##
1033 -{{/expandable}}
950 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
1034 1034  
952 +{{/expand}}
1035 1035  
1036 -== Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ==
954 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1037 1037  
1038 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
1039 -**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
1040 -**Date of Publication:** *2012*
1041 -**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
1042 -**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
1043 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
1044 -**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
1045 1045  
1046 -----
957 +{{expand title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations" expanded="false"}}
958 +**Source:** *Nature*
959 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
960 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
961 +**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
962 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
963 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
1047 1047  
1048 -## **Key Statistics**##
965 +---
1049 1049  
967 +## **Key Statistics**
1050 1050  1. **General Observations:**
1051 - - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
1052 - - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
969 + - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
970 + - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
1053 1053  
1054 1054  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1055 - - **Maternal race had a stronger influence than paternal race** on birth outcomes.
1056 - - **Black mother–White father (BMWF) couples** had a higher risk than **White mother–Black father (WMBF) couples**.
973 + - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
974 + - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
1057 1057  
1058 1058  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1059 - - **Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for key outcomes:**
1060 - - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
1061 - - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
1062 - - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
977 + - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
978 + - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
1063 1063  
1064 -----
980 +---
1065 1065  
1066 -## **Findings**##
1067 -
982 +## **Findings**
1068 1068  1. **Primary Observations:**
1069 - - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
1070 - - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
984 + - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
985 + - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
1071 1071  
1072 1072  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1073 - - **Black mothers (regardless of paternal race) had the highest risk of LBW and PTB**.
1074 - - **White mothers with Black fathers had a lower risk** than Black mothers with White fathers.
988 + - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
989 + - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
1075 1075  
1076 1076  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1077 - - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
1078 - - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
992 + - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
993 + - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
1079 1079  
1080 -----
995 +---
1081 1081  
1082 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1083 -
997 +## **Critique and Observations**
1084 1084  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1085 - - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
1086 - - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
999 + - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
1000 + - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
1087 1087  
1088 1088  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1089 - - Data limited to **Black-White biracial couples**, excluding other racial groups.
1090 - - **Socioeconomic and healthcare access factors** not fully explored.
1003 + - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
1004 + - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
1091 1091  
1092 1092  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1093 - - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
1094 - - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
1007 + - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
1008 + - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
1095 1095  
1096 -----
1010 +---
1097 1097  
1098 1098  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1099 -- Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
1100 -- Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
1101 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
1013 +- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
1014 +- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
1015 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
1102 1102  
1103 -----
1017 +---
1104 1104  
1105 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1019 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1020 +1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
1021 +2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
1022 +3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
1106 1106  
1107 -1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
1108 -2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
1109 -3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
1024 +---
1110 1110  
1111 -----
1112 -
1113 1113  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1114 -This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
1027 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.
1115 1115  
1116 -----
1029 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1117 1117  
1031 +---
1032 +
1118 1118  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1119 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
1120 -{{/expandable}}
1034 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
1121 1121  
1036 +{{/expand}}
1122 1122  
1123 -== Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness ==
1038 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1124 1124  
1125 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
1126 -**Source:** *Current Psychology*
1127 -**Date of Publication:** *2024*
1128 -**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
1129 -**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
1130 -**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
1131 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
1040 +{{expand title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies" expanded="false"}}
1041 +**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
1042 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1043 +**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
1044 +**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
1045 +**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
1046 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
1132 1132  
1133 -----
1048 +---
1134 1134  
1135 -## **Key Statistics**##
1136 -
1050 +## **Key Statistics**
1137 1137  1. **General Observations:**
1138 - - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
1139 - - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
1052 + - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
1053 + - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
1140 1140  
1141 1141  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1142 - - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
1143 - - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
1056 + - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
1057 + - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
1144 1144  
1145 1145  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1146 - - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
1147 - - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
1060 + - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
1061 + - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
1148 1148  
1149 -----
1063 +---
1150 1150  
1151 -## **Findings**##
1152 -
1065 +## **Findings**
1153 1153  1. **Primary Observations:**
1154 - - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
1155 - - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
1067 + - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
1068 + - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
1156 1156  
1157 1157  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1158 - - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
1159 - - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
1071 + - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (~70-80%)**.
1072 + - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
1160 1160  
1161 1161  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1162 - - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
1163 - - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
1075 + - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
1076 + - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
1164 1164  
1165 -----
1078 +---
1166 1166  
1167 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1168 -
1080 +## **Critique and Observations**
1169 1169  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1170 - - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
1171 - - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
1082 + - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
1083 + - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
1172 1172  
1173 1173  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1174 - - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
1175 - - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
1086 + - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
1087 + - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
1176 1176  
1177 1177  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1178 - - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
1179 - - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
1090 + - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
1091 + - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
1180 1180  
1181 -----
1093 +---
1182 1182  
1183 1183  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1184 -- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
1185 -- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
1186 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
1096 +- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
1097 +- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
1098 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
1187 1187  
1188 -----
1100 +---
1189 1189  
1190 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1102 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1103 +1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
1104 +2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
1105 +3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
1191 1191  
1192 -1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
1193 -2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
1194 -3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
1107 +---
1195 1195  
1196 -----
1197 -
1198 1198  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1199 -This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
1110 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.
1200 1200  
1201 1201  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1202 1202  
1203 -----
1114 +---
1204 1204  
1205 1205  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1206 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
1207 -{{/expandable}}
1117 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
1208 1208  
1119 +{{/expand}}
1209 1209  
1210 -= Crime and Substance Abuse =
1121 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1211 1211  
1212 -
1213 -== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1214 -
1215 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1216 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1123 +{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}}
1124 +**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
1217 1217  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
1218 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1219 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1220 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1221 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1126 +**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
1127 +**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
1128 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
1129 +**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*
1222 1222  
1223 -----
1131 +---
1224 1224  
1225 -## **Key Statistics**##
1226 -
1133 +## **Key Statistics**
1227 1227  1. **General Observations:**
1228 - - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1229 - - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1135 + - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
1136 + - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
1230 1230  
1231 1231  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1232 - - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1233 - - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1139 + - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
1140 + - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
1234 1234  
1235 1235  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1236 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1237 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1143 + - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
1144 + - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
1238 1238  
1239 -----
1146 +---
1240 1240  
1241 -## **Findings**##
1242 -
1148 +## **Findings**
1243 1243  1. **Primary Observations:**
1244 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1245 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1150 + - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
1151 + - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
1246 1246  
1247 1247  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1248 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1249 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1154 + - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
1155 + - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
1250 1250  
1251 1251  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1252 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1253 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1158 + - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
1159 + - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
1254 1254  
1255 -----
1161 +---
1256 1256  
1257 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1258 -
1163 +## **Critique and Observations**
1259 1259  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1260 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1261 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1165 + - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
1166 + - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
1262 1262  
1263 1263  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1264 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1265 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1169 + - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
1170 + - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
1266 1266  
1267 1267  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1268 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1269 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1173 + - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
1174 + - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
1270 1270  
1271 -----
1176 +---
1272 1272  
1273 1273  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1274 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1275 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1276 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1179 +- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
1180 +- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
1181 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
1277 1277  
1278 -----
1183 +---
1279 1279  
1280 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1185 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1186 +1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
1187 +2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
1188 +3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
1281 1281  
1282 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1283 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1284 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1190 +---
1285 1285  
1286 -----
1287 -
1288 1288  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1289 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1193 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.
1290 1290  
1291 1291  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1292 1292  
1293 -----
1197 +---
1294 1294  
1295 1295  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1296 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1297 -{{/expandable}}
1200 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
1298 1298  
1202 +{{/expand}}
1299 1299  
1300 -== Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1204 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1301 1301  
1302 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1303 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1304 -**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1305 -**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1306 -**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1307 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1308 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1309 1309  
1310 -----
1311 1311  
1312 -## **Key Statistics**##
1208 +{{expand title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations" expanded="false"}}
1209 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1210 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1211 +**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1212 +**Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1213 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1214 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1313 1313  
1216 +---
1217 +
1218 +## **Key Statistics**
1314 1314  1. **General Observations:**
1315 - - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1316 - - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1220 + - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1221 + - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
1317 1317  
1318 1318  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1319 - - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1320 - - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1224 + - **50% of medical students surveyed endorsed at least one false belief about biological differences**.
1225 + - Participants who held these false beliefs were **more likely to underestimate Black patients pain levels**.
1321 1321  
1322 1322  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1323 - - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1324 - - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1228 + - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1229 + - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1325 1325  
1326 -----
1231 +---
1327 1327  
1328 -## **Findings**##
1329 -
1233 +## **Findings**
1330 1330  1. **Primary Observations:**
1331 - - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1332 - - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1235 + - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1236 + - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
1333 1333  
1334 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1335 - - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1336 - - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1238 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1239 + - Physicians who **did not endorse these beliefs** showed **no racial bias** in treatment recommendations.
1240 + - Bias was **strongest among first-year medical students** and decreased slightly in later years of training.
1337 1337  
1338 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1339 - - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1340 - - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1242 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1243 + - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1244 + - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1341 1341  
1342 -----
1246 +---
1343 1343  
1344 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1248 +## **Critique and Observations**
1249 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1250 + - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1251 + - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
1345 1345  
1346 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1347 - - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1348 - - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1253 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1254 + - The study focuses on **Black vs. white disparities**, leaving other racial/ethnic groups unexplored.
1255 + - Participants' responses were based on **hypothetical medical cases, not real-world treatment decisions**.
1349 1349  
1350 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1351 - - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1352 - - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1257 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1258 + - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1259 + - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1353 1353  
1354 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1355 - - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1356 - - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1261 +---
1357 1357  
1358 -----
1359 -
1360 1360  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1361 -- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1362 -- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1363 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1264 +- Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1265 +- Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1266 +- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1364 1364  
1365 -----
1268 +---
1366 1366  
1367 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1270 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1271 +1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1272 +2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1273 +3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1368 1368  
1369 -1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1370 -2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1371 -3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1275 +---
1372 1372  
1373 -----
1374 -
1375 1375  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1376 -This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
1278 +This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.
1377 1377  
1378 1378  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1379 1379  
1380 -----
1282 +---
1381 1381  
1382 1382  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1383 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
1384 -{{/expandable}}
1285 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1385 1385  
1287 +{{/expand}}
1386 1386  
1387 -== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1289 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1388 1388  
1389 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1390 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1391 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1392 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1393 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1394 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1395 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1396 1396  
1397 -----
1292 +{{expand title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans" expanded="false"}}
1293 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1294 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1295 +**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1296 +**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1297 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1298 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1398 1398  
1399 -## **Key Statistics**##
1300 +---
1400 1400  
1302 +## **Key Statistics**
1401 1401  1. **General Observations:**
1402 - - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1403 - - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1304 + - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1305 + - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
1404 1404  
1405 1405  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1406 - - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1407 - - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1308 + - The increase was **most pronounced among those with a high school education or less**.
1309 + - Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic mortality continued to decline over the same period.
1408 1408  
1409 1409  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1410 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1411 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1312 + - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1313 + - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1412 1412  
1413 -----
1315 +---
1414 1414  
1415 -## **Findings**##
1416 -
1317 +## **Findings**
1417 1417  1. **Primary Observations:**
1418 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1419 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1319 + - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1320 + - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
1420 1420  
1421 1421  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1422 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1423 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1323 + - The **largest mortality increases** occurred among **whites without a college degree**.
1324 + - Chronic pain, functional limitations, and self-reported mental distress **rose significantly in affected groups**.
1424 1424  
1425 1425  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1426 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1427 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1327 + - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1328 + - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1428 1428  
1429 -----
1330 +---
1430 1430  
1431 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1432 -
1332 +## **Critique and Observations**
1433 1433  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1434 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1435 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1334 + - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1335 + - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
1436 1436  
1437 1437  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1438 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1439 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1338 + - Does not establish **causality** between economic decline and increased mortality.
1339 + - Lacks **granular data on opioid prescribing patterns and regional differences**.
1440 1440  
1441 1441  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1442 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1443 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1342 + - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1343 + - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1444 1444  
1445 -----
1345 +---
1446 1446  
1447 1447  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1448 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1449 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1450 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1348 +- Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1349 +- Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1350 +- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1451 1451  
1452 -----
1352 +---
1453 1453  
1454 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1354 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1355 +1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1356 +2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1357 +3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1455 1455  
1456 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1457 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1458 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1359 +---
1459 1459  
1460 -----
1461 -
1462 1462  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1463 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1362 +This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.
1464 1464  
1465 1465  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1466 1466  
1467 -----
1366 +---
1468 1468  
1469 1469  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1470 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1471 -{{/expandable}}
1369 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1472 1472  
1371 +{{/expand}}
1473 1473  
1474 -== Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults ==
1373 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1475 1475  
1476 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1477 - Source: Addictive Behaviors
1478 -Date of Publication: 2016
1479 -Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
1480 -Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
1481 -DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
1482 -Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
1375 +{{expand title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?" expanded="false"}}
1376 +**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1377 +**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1378 +**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1379 +**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1380 +**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1381 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1483 1483  
1484 -Key Statistics
1485 -General Observations:
1383 +---
1486 1486  
1487 -Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
1488 -Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
1489 -Subgroup Analysis:
1490 -
1491 -Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
1492 -Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
1493 -Other Significant Data Points:
1494 -
1495 -Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
1496 -Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
1497 -Findings
1498 -Primary Observations:
1499 -
1500 -Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
1501 -Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
1502 -Subgroup Trends:
1503 -
1504 -Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
1505 -College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
1506 -Specific Case Analysis:
1507 -
1508 -Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
1509 -Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
1510 -Critique and Observations
1511 -Strengths of the Study:
1512 -
1513 -Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
1514 -Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
1515 -Limitations of the Study:
1516 -
1517 -Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
1518 -Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
1519 -Suggestions for Improvement:
1520 -
1521 -Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
1522 -Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
1523 -Relevance to Subproject
1524 -Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
1525 -Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
1526 -Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
1527 -Suggestions for Further Exploration
1528 -Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
1529 -Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
1530 -Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
1531 -Summary of Research Study
1532 -This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
1533 -
1534 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1535 -
1536 -📄 Download Full Study
1537 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
1538 -{{/expandable}}
1539 -
1540 -
1541 -== Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time? ==
1542 -
1543 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1544 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1545 -**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1546 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1547 -**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1548 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1549 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1550 -
1551 -----
1552 -
1553 -## **Key Statistics**##
1554 -
1385 +## **Key Statistics**
1555 1555  1. **General Observations:**
1556 - - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1557 - - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
1387 + - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1388 + - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
1558 1558  
1559 1559  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1560 - - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
1561 - - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
1391 + - Explores differences in **integration, social interactions, and perceptions of diversity**.
1392 + - Studies how **class, education, and neighborhood composition** affect adaptation to urban diversity.
1562 1562  
1563 1563  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1564 - - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1565 - - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1395 + - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1396 + - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1566 1566  
1567 -----
1398 +---
1568 1568  
1569 -## **Findings**##
1570 -
1400 +## **Findings**
1571 1571  1. **Primary Observations:**
1572 - - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1573 - - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
1402 + - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1403 + - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
1574 1574  
1575 1575  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1576 - - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
1577 - - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
1406 + - Young, educated individuals in urban areas **are more open to cultural diversity**.
1407 + - Older and less mobile residents **report feelings of displacement and social isolation**.
1578 1578  
1579 1579  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1580 - - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1581 - - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1410 + - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1411 + - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1582 1582  
1583 -----
1413 +---
1584 1584  
1585 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1586 -
1415 +## **Critique and Observations**
1587 1587  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1588 - - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1589 - - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
1417 + - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1418 + - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
1590 1590  
1591 1591  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1592 - - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
1593 - - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
1421 + - Limited to **Western European urban settings**, missing perspectives from other global regions.
1422 + - Does not fully explore **policy interventions for fostering social cohesion**.
1594 1594  
1595 1595  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1596 - - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1597 - - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1425 + - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1426 + - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1598 1598  
1599 -----
1428 +---
1600 1600  
1601 1601  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1602 -- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1603 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1604 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1431 +- Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1432 +- Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1433 +- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1605 1605  
1606 -----
1435 +---
1607 1607  
1608 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1437 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1438 +1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1439 +2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1440 +3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1609 1609  
1610 -1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1611 -2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1612 -3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1442 +---
1613 1613  
1614 -----
1615 -
1616 1616  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1617 -This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.  ##
1445 +This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.
1618 1618  
1619 1619  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1620 1620  
1621 -----
1449 +---
1622 1622  
1623 1623  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1624 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
1625 -{{/expandable}}
1452 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1626 1626  
1454 +{{/expand}}
1627 1627  
1628 -= Whiteness & White Guilt =
1456 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1629 1629  
1630 -== Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports ==
1458 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1459 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1460 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1461 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1462 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1463 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1464 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1631 1631  
1632 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1633 -**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1634 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1635 -**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1636 -**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1637 -**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1638 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1466 +---
1639 1639  
1640 -----
1641 -
1642 -## **Key Statistics**##
1643 -
1468 +## **Key Statistics**
1644 1644  1. **General Observations:**
1645 - - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1646 - - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
1470 + - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1471 + - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1647 1647  
1648 1648  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1649 - - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
1650 - - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
1474 + - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1475 + - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1651 1651  
1652 1652  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1653 - - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1654 - - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1478 + - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1479 + - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1655 1655  
1656 -----
1481 +---
1657 1657  
1658 -## **Findings**##
1659 -
1483 +## **Findings**
1660 1660  1. **Primary Observations:**
1661 - - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1662 - - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
1485 + - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1486 + - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1663 1663  
1664 1664  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1665 - - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
1666 - - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
1489 + - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1490 + - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1667 1667  
1668 1668  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1669 - - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1670 - - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1493 + - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1494 + - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1671 1671  
1672 -----
1496 +---
1673 1673  
1674 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1675 -
1498 +## **Critique and Observations**
1676 1676  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1677 - - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1678 - - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
1500 + - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1501 + - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1679 1679  
1680 1680  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1681 - - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
1682 - - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
1504 + - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1505 + - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1683 1683  
1684 1684  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1685 - - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1686 - - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1508 + - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1509 + - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1687 1687  
1688 -----
1511 +---
1689 1689  
1690 1690  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1691 -- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1692 -- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1693 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1514 +- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1515 +- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1516 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1694 1694  
1695 -----
1518 +---
1696 1696  
1697 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1520 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1521 +1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1522 +2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1523 +3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1698 1698  
1699 -1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1700 -2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1701 -3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1525 +---
1702 1702  
1703 -----
1704 -
1705 1705  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1706 -This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
1528 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1707 1707  
1708 1708  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1709 1709  
1710 -----
1532 +---
1711 1711  
1712 1712  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1713 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
1714 -{{/expandable}}
1535 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1715 1715  
1537 +{{/expand}}
1716 1716  
1717 -== Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations ==
1539 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1718 1718  
1719 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1720 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1721 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1722 -**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1723 -**Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1724 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1725 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1726 1726  
1727 -----
1542 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1543 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1544 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1545 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1546 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1547 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1548 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1728 1728  
1729 -## **Key Statistics**##
1550 +---
1730 1730  
1552 +## **Key Statistics**
1731 1731  1. **General Observations:**
1732 - - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1733 - - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
1554 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1555 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1734 1734  
1735 1735  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1736 - - **50% of medical students surveyed endorsed at least one false belief about biological differences**.
1737 - - Participants who held these false beliefs were **more likely to underestimate Black patients pain levels**.
1558 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1559 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1738 1738  
1739 1739  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1740 - - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1741 - - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1562 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1563 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1742 1742  
1743 -----
1565 +---
1744 1744  
1745 -## **Findings**##
1746 -
1567 +## **Findings**
1747 1747  1. **Primary Observations:**
1748 - - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1749 - - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
1569 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1570 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1750 1750  
1751 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1752 - - Physicians who **did not endorse these beliefs** showed **no racial bias** in treatment recommendations.
1753 - - Bias was **strongest among first-year medical students** and decreased slightly in later years of training.
1572 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1573 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1574 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1754 1754  
1755 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1756 - - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1757 - - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1576 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1577 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1578 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1758 1758  
1759 -----
1580 +---
1760 1760  
1761 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1582 +## **Critique and Observations**
1583 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1584 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1585 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1762 1762  
1763 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1764 - - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1765 - - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
1587 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1588 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1589 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1766 1766  
1767 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1768 - - The study focuses on **Black vs. white disparities**, leaving other racial/ethnic groups unexplored.
1769 - - Participants' responses were based on **hypothetical medical cases, not real-world treatment decisions**.
1591 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1592 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1593 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1770 1770  
1771 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1772 - - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1773 - - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1595 +---
1774 1774  
1775 -----
1776 -
1777 1777  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1778 -- Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1779 -- Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1780 -- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1598 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1599 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1600 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1781 1781  
1782 -----
1602 +---
1783 1783  
1784 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1604 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1605 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1606 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1607 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1785 1785  
1786 -1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1787 -2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1788 -3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1609 +---
1789 1789  
1790 -----
1791 -
1792 1792  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1793 -This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
1612 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1794 1794  
1795 1795  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1796 1796  
1797 -----
1616 +---
1798 1798  
1799 1799  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1800 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
1801 -{{/expandable}}
1619 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1802 1802  
1621 +{{/expand}}
1803 1803  
1804 -== Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans ==
1623 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1805 1805  
1806 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1807 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1808 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1809 -**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1810 -**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1811 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1812 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1625 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1626 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1627 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1628 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1629 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1630 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1631 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1813 1813  
1814 -----
1633 +---
1815 1815  
1816 -## **Key Statistics**##
1817 -
1635 +## **Key Statistics**
1818 1818  1. **General Observations:**
1819 - - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1820 - - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
1637 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1638 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1821 1821  
1822 1822  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1823 - - The increase was **most pronounced among those with a high school education or less**.
1824 - - Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic mortality continued to decline over the same period.
1641 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1642 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1825 1825  
1826 1826  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1827 - - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1828 - - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1645 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1646 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1829 1829  
1830 -----
1648 +---
1831 1831  
1832 -## **Findings**##
1833 -
1650 +## **Findings**
1834 1834  1. **Primary Observations:**
1835 - - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1836 - - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
1652 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1653 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1837 1837  
1838 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1839 - - The **largest mortality increases** occurred among **whites without a college degree**.
1840 - - Chronic pain, functional limitations, and self-reported mental distress **rose significantly in affected groups**.
1655 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1656 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1657 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1841 1841  
1842 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1843 - - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1844 - - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1659 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1660 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1661 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1845 1845  
1846 -----
1663 +---
1847 1847  
1848 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1665 +## **Critique and Observations**
1666 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1667 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1668 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1849 1849  
1850 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1851 - - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1852 - - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
1670 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1671 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1672 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1853 1853  
1854 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1855 - - Does not establish **causality** between economic decline and increased mortality.
1856 - - Lacks **granular data on opioid prescribing patterns and regional differences**.
1674 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1675 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1676 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1857 1857  
1858 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1859 - - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1860 - - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1678 +---
1861 1861  
1862 -----
1863 -
1864 1864  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1865 -- Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1866 -- Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1867 -- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1681 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1682 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1683 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1868 1868  
1869 -----
1685 +---
1870 1870  
1871 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1687 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1688 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1689 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1690 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1872 1872  
1873 -1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1874 -2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1875 -3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1692 +---
1876 1876  
1877 -----
1878 -
1879 1879  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1880 -This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
1695 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1881 1881  
1882 1882  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1883 1883  
1884 -----
1699 +---
1885 1885  
1886 1886  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1887 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
1888 -{{/expandable}}
1702 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1889 1889  
1704 +{{/expand}}
1890 1890  
1891 -== Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities? ==
1706 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1892 1892  
1893 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1894 -**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1895 -**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1896 -**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1897 -**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1898 -**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1899 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1708 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1709 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1710 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1711 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1712 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1713 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1714 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1900 1900  
1901 -----
1716 +---
1902 1902  
1903 -## **Key Statistics**##
1904 -
1718 +## **Key Statistics**
1905 1905  1. **General Observations:**
1906 - - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1907 - - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
1720 + - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1721 + - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1908 1908  
1909 1909  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1910 - - Explores differences in **integration, social interactions, and perceptions of diversity**.
1911 - - Studies how **class, education, and neighborhood composition** affect adaptation to urban diversity.
1724 + - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1725 + - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1912 1912  
1913 1913  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1914 - - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1915 - - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1728 + - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1729 + - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1916 1916  
1917 -----
1731 +---
1918 1918  
1919 -## **Findings**##
1920 -
1733 +## **Findings**
1921 1921  1. **Primary Observations:**
1922 - - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1923 - - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
1735 + - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1736 + - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1924 1924  
1925 1925  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1926 - - Young, educated individuals in urban areas **are more open to cultural diversity**.
1927 - - Older and less mobile residents **report feelings of displacement and social isolation**.
1739 + - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1740 + - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1928 1928  
1929 1929  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1930 - - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1931 - - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1743 + - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1744 + - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1932 1932  
1933 -----
1746 +---
1934 1934  
1935 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1936 -
1748 +## **Critique and Observations**
1937 1937  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1938 - - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1939 - - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
1750 + - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1751 + - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1940 1940  
1941 1941  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1942 - - Limited to **Western European urban settings**, missing perspectives from other global regions.
1943 - - Does not fully explore **policy interventions for fostering social cohesion**.
1754 + - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1755 + - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1944 1944  
1945 1945  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1946 - - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1947 - - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1758 + - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1759 + - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1948 1948  
1949 -----
1761 +---
1950 1950  
1951 1951  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1952 -- Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1953 -- Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1954 -- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
1764 +- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1765 +- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1766 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1955 1955  
1956 -----
1768 +---
1957 1957  
1958 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1770 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1771 +1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1772 +2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1773 +3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1959 1959  
1960 -1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1961 -2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1962 -3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1775 +---
1963 1963  
1964 -----
1965 -
1966 1966  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1967 -This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
1778 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1968 1968  
1969 1969  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1970 1970  
1971 -----
1782 +---
1972 1972  
1973 1973  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1974 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
1975 -{{/expandable}}
1785 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1976 1976  
1787 +{{/expand}}
1977 1977  
1978 -= Media =
1789 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1979 1979  
1980 -
1981 -== Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic ==
1982 -
1983 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"}}
1791 +{{expand title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict" expanded="false"}}
1984 1984  **Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1985 1985  **Date of Publication:** *2021*
1986 1986  **Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1987 1987  **Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1988 1988  **DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1989 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1797 +**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*
1990 1990  
1991 -----
1799 +---
1992 1992  
1993 -## **Key Statistics**##
1994 -
1801 +## **Key Statistics**
1995 1995  1. **General Observations:**
1996 1996   - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1997 1997   - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
... ... @@ -2004,10 +2004,9 @@
2004 2004   - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
2005 2005   - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
2006 2006  
2007 -----
1814 +---
2008 2008  
2009 -## **Findings**##
2010 -
1816 +## **Findings**
2011 2011  1. **Primary Observations:**
2012 2012   - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
2013 2013   - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
... ... @@ -2020,10 +2020,9 @@
2020 2020   - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
2021 2021   - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
2022 2022  
2023 -----
1829 +---
2024 2024  
2025 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2026 -
1831 +## **Critique and Observations**
2027 2027  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2028 2028   - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
2029 2029   - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
... ... @@ -2036,132 +2036,46 @@
2036 2036   - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
2037 2037   - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
2038 2038  
2039 -----
1844 +---
2040 2040  
2041 2041  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2042 2042  - Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
2043 2043  - Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
2044 -- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
1849 +- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
2045 2045  
2046 -----
1851 +---
2047 2047  
2048 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2049 -
1853 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2050 2050  1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
2051 2051  2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
2052 2052  3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
2053 2053  
2054 -----
1858 +---
2055 2055  
2056 2056  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2057 -This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
1861 +This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.
2058 2058  
2059 -----
1863 +---
2060 2060  
2061 2061  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2062 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
2063 -{{/expandable}}
1866 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
2064 2064  
1868 +{{/expand}}
2065 2065  
2066 -== Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions ==
1870 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
2067 2067  
2068 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
2069 -**Source:** *Politics & Policy*
2070 -**Date of Publication:** *2007*
2071 -**Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
2072 -**Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
2073 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
2074 -**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
2075 2075  
2076 -----
2077 -
2078 -## **Key Statistics**##
2079 -
2080 -1. **General Observations:**
2081 - - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
2082 - - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
2083 -
2084 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
2085 - - **Equality-based framing decreases opposition** to same-sex marriage.
2086 - - **Morality-based framing increases opposition** to same-sex marriage.
2087 -
2088 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
2089 - - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
2090 - - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
2091 -
2092 -----
2093 -
2094 -## **Findings**##
2095 -
2096 -1. **Primary Observations:**
2097 - - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
2098 - - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
2099 -
2100 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
2101 - - **Religious and conservative audiences** respond more to morality-based framing.
2102 - - **Younger and progressive audiences** respond more to equality-based framing.
2103 -
2104 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
2105 - - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
2106 - - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
2107 -
2108 -----
2109 -
2110 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2111 -
2112 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2113 - - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
2114 - - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
2115 -
2116 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
2117 - - Focuses **only on U.S. media coverage**, limiting global applicability.
2118 - - Does not account for **social media's growing influence** on public opinion.
2119 -
2120 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
2121 - - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
2122 - - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
2123 -
2124 -----
2125 -
2126 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
2127 -- Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
2128 -- Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
2129 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
2130 -
2131 -----
2132 -
2133 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2134 -
2135 -1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
2136 -2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
2137 -3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
2138 -
2139 -----
2140 -
2141 -## **Summary of Research Study**
2142 -This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
2143 -
2144 -----
2145 -
2146 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
2147 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
2148 -{{/expandable}}
2149 -
2150 -
2151 -== Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion ==
2152 -
2153 -{{expandable expandByDefault="false" summary="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
1873 +{{expand title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion" expanded="false"}}
2154 2154  **Source:** *Journal of Communication*
2155 2155  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
2156 2156  **Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
2157 2157  **Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
2158 2158  **DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2159 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
1879 +**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*
2160 2160  
2161 -----
1881 +---
2162 2162  
2163 -## **Key Statistics**##
2164 -
1883 +## **Key Statistics**
2165 2165  1. **General Observations:**
2166 2166   - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
2167 2167   - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
... ... @@ -2174,10 +2174,9 @@
2174 2174   - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
2175 2175   - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
2176 2176  
2177 -----
1896 +---
2178 2178  
2179 -## **Findings**##
2180 -
1898 +## **Findings**
2181 2181  1. **Primary Observations:**
2182 2182   - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
2183 2183   - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
... ... @@ -2190,10 +2190,9 @@
2190 2190   - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
2191 2191   - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
2192 2192  
2193 -----
1911 +---
2194 2194  
2195 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2196 -
1913 +## **Critique and Observations**
2197 2197  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2198 2198   - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
2199 2199   - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
... ... @@ -2206,28 +2206,31 @@
2206 2206   - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
2207 2207   - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
2208 2208  
2209 -----
1926 +---
2210 2210  
2211 2211  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2212 2212  - Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
2213 2213  - Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
2214 -- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
1931 +- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
2215 2215  
2216 -----
1933 +---
2217 2217  
2218 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2219 -
1935 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2220 2220  1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
2221 2221  2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
2222 2222  3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
2223 2223  
2224 -----
1940 +---
2225 2225  
2226 2226  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2227 -This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
1943 +This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.
2228 2228  
2229 -----
1945 +---
2230 2230  
2231 2231  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2232 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
1948 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
1949 +
2233 2233  {{/expand}}
1951 +
1952 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1953 +
Cultural Voyeurism A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Intera.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -103.1 KB
Content