0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 92.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/04/16 00:27
Change comment: Rollback to version 89.1
To version 94.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/04/16 00:43
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -110,9 +110,7 @@
110 110  = Genetics =
111 111  
112 112  
113 -== Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History ==
114 -
115 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
113 +{{expandable summary="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
116 116  **Source:** *Nature*
117 117  **Date of Publication:** *2009*
118 118  **Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
... ... @@ -120,10 +120,7 @@
120 120  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
121 121  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
122 122  
123 -----
124 -
125 -## **Key Statistics**##
126 -
121 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
127 127  1. **General Observations:**
128 128   - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
129 129   - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
... ... @@ -135,11 +135,9 @@
135 135  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
136 136   - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
137 137   - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
133 +{{/expandable}}
138 138  
139 -----
140 -
141 -## **Findings**##
142 -
135 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
143 143  1. **Primary Observations:**
144 144   - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
145 145   - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
... ... @@ -151,11 +151,9 @@
151 151  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
152 152   - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
153 153   - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
147 +{{/expandable}}
154 154  
155 -----
156 -
157 -## **Critique and Observations**##
158 -
149 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
159 159  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
160 160   - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
161 161   - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
... ... @@ -167,39 +167,31 @@
167 167  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
168 168   - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
169 169   - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
161 +{{/expandable}}
170 170  
171 -----
172 -
173 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
163 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
174 174  - Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
175 175  - Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
176 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
166 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
167 +{{/expandable}}
177 177  
178 -----
179 -
180 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
181 -
169 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
182 182  1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
183 183  2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
184 184  3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
173 +{{/expandable}}
185 185  
186 -----
175 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
176 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
177 +##
178 + ##
179 +{{/expandable}}
180 +{{/expandable}}
187 187  
188 -## **Summary of Research Study**
189 -This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
182 +{{expandable summary="
190 190  
191 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
192 192  
193 -----
194 -
195 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
196 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
197 -{{/expand}}
198 -
199 -
200 -== Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations ==
201 -
202 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
185 +Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
203 203  **Source:** *Nature*
204 204  **Date of Publication:** *2016*
205 205  **Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
... ... @@ -207,10 +207,7 @@
207 207  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
208 208  **Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
209 209  
210 -----
211 -
212 -## **Key Statistics**##
213 -
193 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
214 214  1. **General Observations:**
215 215   - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
216 216   - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
... ... @@ -222,11 +222,9 @@
222 222  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
223 223   - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
224 224   - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
205 +{{/expandable}}
225 225  
226 -----
227 -
228 -## **Findings**##
229 -
207 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
230 230  1. **Primary Observations:**
231 231   - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
232 232   - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
... ... @@ -238,11 +238,9 @@
238 238  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
239 239   - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
240 240   - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
219 +{{/expandable}}
241 241  
242 -----
243 -
244 -## **Critique and Observations**##
245 -
221 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
246 246  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
247 247   - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
248 248   - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
... ... @@ -254,39 +254,31 @@
254 254  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
255 255   - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
256 256   - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
233 +{{/expandable}}
257 257  
258 -----
259 -
260 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
235 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
261 261  - Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
262 262  - Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
263 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
238 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
239 +{{/expandable}}
264 264  
265 -----
266 -
267 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
268 -
241 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
269 269  1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
270 270  2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
271 271  3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
245 +{{/expandable}}
272 272  
273 -----
247 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
248 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
249 +##
250 + ##
251 +{{/expandable}}
252 +{{/expandable}}
274 274  
275 -## **Summary of Research Study**
276 -This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
254 +{{expandable summary="
277 277  
278 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
279 279  
280 -----
281 -
282 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
283 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
284 -{{/expand}}
285 -
286 -
287 -== Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies ==
288 -
289 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
257 +Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
290 290  **Source:** *Nature Genetics*
291 291  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
292 292  **Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
... ... @@ -294,10 +294,7 @@
294 294  **DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
295 295  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
296 296  
297 -----
298 -
299 -## **Key Statistics**##
300 -
265 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
301 301  1. **General Observations:**
302 302   - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
303 303   - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
... ... @@ -309,11 +309,9 @@
309 309  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
310 310   - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
311 311   - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
277 +{{/expandable}}
312 312  
313 -----
314 -
315 -## **Findings**##
316 -
279 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
317 317  1. **Primary Observations:**
318 318   - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
319 319   - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
... ... @@ -325,11 +325,9 @@
325 325  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
326 326   - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
327 327   - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
291 +{{/expandable}}
328 328  
329 -----
330 -
331 -## **Critique and Observations**##
332 -
293 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
333 333  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
334 334   - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
335 335   - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
... ... @@ -341,39 +341,29 @@
341 341  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
342 342   - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
343 343   - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
305 +{{/expandable}}
344 344  
345 -----
346 -
347 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
307 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
348 348  - Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
349 349  - Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
350 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
310 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
311 +{{/expandable}}
351 351  
352 -----
353 -
354 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
355 -
313 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
356 356  1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
357 357  2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
358 358  3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
317 +{{/expandable}}
359 359  
360 -----
319 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
320 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
321 +{{/expandable}}
322 +{{/expandable}}
361 361  
362 -## **Summary of Research Study**
363 -This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
324 +{{expandable summary="
364 364  
365 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
366 366  
367 -----
368 -
369 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
370 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
371 -{{/expand}}
372 -
373 -
374 -== Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease ==
375 -
376 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
327 +Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
377 377  **Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
378 378  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
379 379  **Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
... ... @@ -381,10 +381,7 @@
381 381  **DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
382 382  **Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
383 383  
384 -----
385 -
386 -## **Key Statistics**##
387 -
335 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
388 388  1. **General Observations:**
389 389   - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
390 390   - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
... ... @@ -396,11 +396,9 @@
396 396  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
397 397   - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
398 398   - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
347 +{{/expandable}}
399 399  
400 -----
401 -
402 -## **Findings**##
403 -
349 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
404 404  1. **Primary Observations:**
405 405   - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
406 406   - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
... ... @@ -412,11 +412,9 @@
412 412  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
413 413   - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
414 414   - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
361 +{{/expandable}}
415 415  
416 -----
417 -
418 -## **Critique and Observations**##
419 -
363 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
420 420  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
421 421   - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
422 422   - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
... ... @@ -428,39 +428,29 @@
428 428  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
429 429   - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
430 430   - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
375 +{{/expandable}}
431 431  
432 -----
433 -
434 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
377 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
435 435  - Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
436 436  - Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
437 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
380 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
381 +{{/expandable}}
438 438  
439 -----
440 -
441 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
442 -
383 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
443 443  1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
444 444  2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
445 445  3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
387 +{{/expandable}}
446 446  
447 -----
389 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
390 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
391 +{{/expandable}}
392 +{{/expandable}}
448 448  
449 -## **Summary of Research Study**
450 -This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
394 +{{expandable summary="
451 451  
452 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
453 453  
454 -----
455 -
456 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
457 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
458 -{{/expand}}
459 -
460 -
461 -== Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA ==
462 -
463 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
397 +Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
464 464  **Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
465 465  **Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
466 466  **Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
... ... @@ -468,10 +468,7 @@
468 468  **DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
469 469  **Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
470 470  
471 -----
472 -
473 -## **Key Statistics**##
474 -
405 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
475 475  1. **General Observations:**
476 476   - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
477 477   - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
... ... @@ -483,11 +483,9 @@
483 483  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
484 484   - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
485 485   - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
417 +{{/expandable}}
486 486  
487 -----
488 -
489 -## **Findings**##
490 -
419 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
491 491  1. **Primary Observations:**
492 492   - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
493 493   - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
... ... @@ -500,11 +500,9 @@
500 500   - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
501 501   - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
502 502   - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
432 +{{/expandable}}
503 503  
504 -----
505 -
506 -## **Critique and Observations**##
507 -
434 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
508 508  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
509 509   - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
510 510   - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
... ... @@ -516,37 +516,29 @@
516 516  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
517 517   - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
518 518   - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
446 +{{/expandable}}
519 519  
520 -----
521 -
522 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
448 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
523 523  - Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
524 524  - Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
525 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
451 +- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.
452 +{{/expandable}}
526 526  
527 -----
528 -
529 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
530 -
454 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
531 531  1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
532 532  2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
533 533  3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
458 +{{/expandable}}
534 534  
535 -----
460 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
461 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]
462 +{{/expandable}}
463 +{{/expandable}}
536 536  
537 -## **Summary of Research Study**
538 -This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
465 +{{expandable summary="
539 539  
540 -----
541 541  
542 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
543 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
544 -{{/expand}}
545 -
546 -
547 -== Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age ==
548 -
549 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
468 +Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
550 550  **Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
551 551  **Date of Publication:** *2013*
552 552  **Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
... ... @@ -554,10 +554,7 @@
554 554  **DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
555 555  **Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
556 556  
557 -----
558 -
559 -## **Key Statistics**##
560 -
476 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
561 561  1. **General Observations:**
562 562   - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
563 563   - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
... ... @@ -569,11 +569,9 @@
569 569  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
570 570   - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
571 571   - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
488 +{{/expandable}}
572 572  
573 -----
574 -
575 -## **Findings**##
576 -
490 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
577 577  1. **Primary Observations:**
578 578   - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
579 579   - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
... ... @@ -585,11 +585,9 @@
585 585  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
586 586   - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
587 587   - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
502 +{{/expandable}}
588 588  
589 -----
590 -
591 -## **Critique and Observations**##
592 -
504 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
593 593  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
594 594   - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
595 595   - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
... ... @@ -601,39 +601,29 @@
601 601  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
602 602   - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
603 603   - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
516 +{{/expandable}}
604 604  
605 -----
606 -
607 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
518 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
608 608  - Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
609 609  - Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
610 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
521 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
522 +{{/expandable}}
611 611  
612 -----
613 -
614 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
615 -
524 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
616 616  1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
617 617  2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
618 618  3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
528 +{{/expandable}}
619 619  
620 -----
530 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
531 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
532 +{{/expandable}}
533 +{{/expandable}}
621 621  
622 -## **Summary of Research Study**
623 -This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
535 +{{expandable summary="
624 624  
625 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
626 626  
627 -----
628 -
629 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
630 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
631 -{{/expand}}
632 -
633 -
634 -== Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications ==
635 -
636 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
538 +Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
637 637  **Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
638 638  **Date of Publication:** *2010*
639 639  **Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
... ... @@ -641,10 +641,7 @@
641 641  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
642 642  **Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
643 643  
644 -----
645 -
646 -## **Key Statistics**##
647 -
546 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
648 648  1. **General Observations:**
649 649   - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
650 650   - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
... ... @@ -656,11 +656,9 @@
656 656  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
657 657   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
658 658   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
558 +{{/expandable}}
659 659  
660 -----
661 -
662 -## **Findings**##
663 -
560 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
664 664  1. **Primary Observations:**
665 665   - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
666 666   - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
... ... @@ -672,11 +672,9 @@
672 672  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
673 673   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
674 674   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
572 +{{/expandable}}
675 675  
676 -----
677 -
678 -## **Critique and Observations**##
679 -
574 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
680 680  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
681 681   - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
682 682   - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
... ... @@ -688,39 +688,29 @@
688 688  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
689 689   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
690 690   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
586 +{{/expandable}}
691 691  
692 -----
693 -
694 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
588 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
695 695  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
696 696  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
697 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
591 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
592 +{{/expandable}}
698 698  
699 -----
700 -
701 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
702 -
594 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
703 703  1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
704 704  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
705 705  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
598 +{{/expandable}}
706 706  
707 -----
600 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
601 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
602 +{{/expandable}}
603 +{{/expandable}}
708 708  
709 -## **Summary of Research Study**
710 -This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
605 +{{expandable summary="
711 711  
712 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
713 713  
714 -----
715 -
716 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
717 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
718 -{{/expand}}
719 -
720 -
721 -== Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media ==
722 -
723 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
608 +Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
724 724  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
725 725  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
726 726  **Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
... ... @@ -728,10 +728,7 @@
728 728  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
729 729  **Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
730 730  
731 -----
732 -
733 -## **Key Statistics**##
734 -
616 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
735 735  1. **General Observations:**
736 736   - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
737 737   - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
... ... @@ -743,11 +743,9 @@
743 743  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
744 744   - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
745 745   - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
628 +{{/expandable}}
746 746  
747 -----
748 -
749 -## **Findings**##
750 -
630 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
751 751  1. **Primary Observations:**
752 752   - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
753 753   - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
... ... @@ -759,11 +759,9 @@
759 759  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
760 760   - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
761 761   - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
642 +{{/expandable}}
762 762  
763 -----
764 -
765 -## **Critique and Observations**##
766 -
644 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
767 767  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
768 768   - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
769 769   - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
... ... @@ -775,39 +775,29 @@
775 775  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
776 776   - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
777 777   - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
656 +{{/expandable}}
778 778  
779 -----
780 -
781 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
658 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
782 782  - Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
783 783  - Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
784 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
661 +- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
662 +{{/expandable}}
785 785  
786 -----
787 -
788 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
789 -
664 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
790 790  1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
791 791  2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
792 792  3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
668 +{{/expandable}}
793 793  
794 -----
670 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
671 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
672 +{{/expandable}}
673 +{{/expandable}}
795 795  
796 -## **Summary of Research Study**
797 -This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
675 +{{expandable summary="
798 798  
799 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
800 800  
801 -----
802 -
803 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
804 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
805 -{{/expand}}
806 -
807 -
808 -== Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation ==
809 -
810 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
678 +Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
811 811  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
812 812  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
813 813  **Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
... ... @@ -815,10 +815,7 @@
815 815  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
816 816  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
817 817  
818 -----
819 -
820 -## **Key Statistics**##
821 -
686 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
822 822  1. **General Observations:**
823 823   - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
824 824   - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
... ... @@ -830,11 +830,9 @@
830 830  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
831 831   - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
832 832   - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
698 +{{/expandable}}
833 833  
834 -----
835 -
836 -## **Findings**##
837 -
700 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
838 838  1. **Primary Observations:**
839 839   - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
840 840   - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
... ... @@ -846,11 +846,9 @@
846 846  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
847 847   - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
848 848   - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
712 +{{/expandable}}
849 849  
850 -----
851 -
852 -## **Critique and Observations**##
853 -
714 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
854 854  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
855 855   - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
856 856   - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
... ... @@ -862,39 +862,29 @@
862 862  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
863 863   - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
864 864   - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
726 +{{/expandable}}
865 865  
866 -----
867 -
868 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
728 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
869 869  - Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
870 870  - Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
871 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
731 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
732 +{{/expandable}}
872 872  
873 -----
874 -
875 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
876 -
734 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
877 877  1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
878 878  2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
879 879  3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
738 +{{/expandable}}
880 880  
881 -----
740 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
741 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
742 +{{/expandable}}
743 +{{/expandable}}
882 882  
883 -## **Summary of Research Study**
884 -This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.  ##
745 +{{expandable summary="
885 885  
886 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
887 887  
888 -----
889 -
890 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
891 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
892 -{{/expand}}
893 -
894 -
895 -== Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding ==
896 -
897 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
748 +Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding"}}
898 898  **Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
899 899  **Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
900 900  **Author(s):** Smith et al.
... ... @@ -901,39 +901,9 @@
901 901  **Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
902 902  **DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
903 903  **Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science 
755 +{{/expandable}}
904 904  
905 -**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
906 -
907 - **Key Statistics**
908 -
909 -1. **General Observations:**
910 - - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
911 - - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
912 -
913 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
914 - - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
915 - - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
916 -
917 - **Findings**
918 -
919 -- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
920 -- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
921 -
922 - **Relevance to Subproject**
923 -
924 -- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
925 -- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
926 -{{/expand}}
927 -
928 -
929 -----
930 -
931 -= Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
932 -
933 -
934 -== Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018 ==
935 -
936 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
757 +{{expandable summary="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
937 937  **Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
938 938  **Date of Publication:** *2020*
939 939  **Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
... ... @@ -941,10 +941,7 @@
941 941  **DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
942 942  **Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
943 943  
944 -----
945 -
946 -## **Key Statistics**##
947 -
765 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
948 948  1. **General Observations:**
949 949   - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
950 950   - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
... ... @@ -956,11 +956,9 @@
956 956  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
957 957   - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
958 958   - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
777 +{{/expandable}}
959 959  
960 -----
961 -
962 -## **Findings**##
963 -
779 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
964 964  1. **Primary Observations:**
965 965   - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
966 966   - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
... ... @@ -972,11 +972,9 @@
972 972  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
973 973   - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
974 974   - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
791 +{{/expandable}}
975 975  
976 -----
977 -
978 -## **Critique and Observations**##
979 -
793 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
980 980  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
981 981   - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
982 982   - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
... ... @@ -988,31 +988,21 @@
988 988  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
989 989   - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
990 990   - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
805 +{{/expandable}}
991 991  
992 -----
993 -
994 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
807 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
995 995  - Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
996 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
809 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
810 +{{/expandable}}
997 997  
998 -----
999 -
1000 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1001 -
812 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1002 1002  1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
1003 1003  2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
815 +{{/expandable}}
1004 1004  
1005 -----
1006 -
1007 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1008 -This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.  ##
1009 -
1010 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1011 -
1012 -----
1013 -
1014 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1015 -{{velocity}}
817 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
818 +{{velocity}}
819 +
1016 1016  #set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
1017 1017  #set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
1018 1018  #if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
... ... @@ -1019,13 +1019,15 @@
1019 1019  [[Download>>attach:$filename]]
1020 1020  #else
1021 1021  {{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
1022 -#end {{/velocity}}##
1023 -{{/expand}}
826 +#end
827 +{{/velocity}}
828 +{{/expandable}}
829 +{{/expandable}}
1024 1024  
831 +{{expandable summary="
1025 1025  
1026 -== Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ==
1027 1027  
1028 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
834 +Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
1029 1029  **Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
1030 1030  **Date of Publication:** *2012*
1031 1031  **Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
... ... @@ -1033,10 +1033,7 @@
1033 1033  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
1034 1034  **Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
1035 1035  
1036 -----
1037 -
1038 -## **Key Statistics**##
1039 -
842 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1040 1040  1. **General Observations:**
1041 1041   - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
1042 1042   - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
... ... @@ -1050,11 +1050,9 @@
1050 1050   - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
1051 1051   - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
1052 1052   - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
856 +{{/expandable}}
1053 1053  
1054 -----
1055 -
1056 -## **Findings**##
1057 -
858 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1058 1058  1. **Primary Observations:**
1059 1059   - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
1060 1060   - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
... ... @@ -1066,11 +1066,9 @@
1066 1066  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1067 1067   - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
1068 1068   - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
870 +{{/expandable}}
1069 1069  
1070 -----
1071 -
1072 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1073 -
872 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1074 1074  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1075 1075   - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
1076 1076   - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
... ... @@ -1082,37 +1082,29 @@
1082 1082  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1083 1083   - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
1084 1084   - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
884 +{{/expandable}}
1085 1085  
1086 -----
1087 -
1088 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
886 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1089 1089  - Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
1090 1090  - Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
1091 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
889 +- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.
890 +{{/expandable}}
1092 1092  
1093 -----
1094 -
1095 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1096 -
892 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1097 1097  1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
1098 1098  2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
1099 1099  3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
896 +{{/expandable}}
1100 1100  
1101 -----
898 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
899 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]
900 +{{/expandable}}
901 +{{/expandable}}
1102 1102  
1103 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1104 -This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
903 +{{expandable summary="
1105 1105  
1106 -----
1107 1107  
1108 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1109 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
1110 -{{/expand}}
1111 -
1112 -
1113 -== Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness ==
1114 -
1115 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
906 +Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
1116 1116  **Source:** *Current Psychology*
1117 1117  **Date of Publication:** *2024*
1118 1118  **Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
... ... @@ -1120,10 +1120,7 @@
1120 1120  **DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
1121 1121  **Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
1122 1122  
1123 -----
1124 -
1125 -## **Key Statistics**##
1126 -
914 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1127 1127  1. **General Observations:**
1128 1128   - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
1129 1129   - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
... ... @@ -1135,11 +1135,9 @@
1135 1135  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1136 1136   - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
1137 1137   - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
926 +{{/expandable}}
1138 1138  
1139 -----
1140 -
1141 -## **Findings**##
1142 -
928 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1143 1143  1. **Primary Observations:**
1144 1144   - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
1145 1145   - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
... ... @@ -1151,11 +1151,9 @@
1151 1151  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1152 1152   - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
1153 1153   - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
940 +{{/expandable}}
1154 1154  
1155 -----
1156 -
1157 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1158 -
942 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1159 1159  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1160 1160   - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
1161 1161   - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
... ... @@ -1167,42 +1167,31 @@
1167 1167  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1168 1168   - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
1169 1169   - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
954 +{{/expandable}}
1170 1170  
1171 -----
1172 -
1173 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
956 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1174 1174  - Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
1175 1175  - Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
1176 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
959 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
960 +{{/expandable}}
1177 1177  
1178 -----
1179 -
1180 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1181 -
962 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1182 1182  1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
1183 1183  2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
1184 1184  3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
966 +{{/expandable}}
1185 1185  
1186 -----
968 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
969 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
970 +{{/expandable}}
1187 1187  
1188 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1189 -This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
1190 -
1191 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1192 -
1193 -----
1194 -
1195 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1196 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
1197 -{{/expand}}
1198 -
1199 -
1200 1200  = Crime and Substance Abuse =
973 +{{/expandable}}
1201 1201  
975 +{{expandable summary="
1202 1202  
1203 -== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1204 1204  
1205 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
978 +Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1206 1206  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1207 1207  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
1208 1208  **Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
... ... @@ -1210,10 +1210,7 @@
1210 1210  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1211 1211  **Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1212 1212  
1213 -----
1214 -
1215 -## **Key Statistics**##
1216 -
986 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1217 1217  1. **General Observations:**
1218 1218   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1219 1219   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -1225,11 +1225,9 @@
1225 1225  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1226 1226   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1227 1227   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
998 +{{/expandable}}
1228 1228  
1229 -----
1230 -
1231 -## **Findings**##
1232 -
1000 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1233 1233  1. **Primary Observations:**
1234 1234   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1235 1235   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -1241,11 +1241,9 @@
1241 1241  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1242 1242   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1243 1243   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1012 +{{/expandable}}
1244 1244  
1245 -----
1246 -
1247 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1248 -
1014 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1249 1249  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1250 1250   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1251 1251   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1257,39 +1257,29 @@
1257 1257  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1258 1258   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1259 1259   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1026 +{{/expandable}}
1260 1260  
1261 -----
1262 -
1263 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1028 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1264 1264  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1265 1265  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1266 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1031 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1032 +{{/expandable}}
1267 1267  
1268 -----
1269 -
1270 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1271 -
1034 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1272 1272  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1273 1273  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1274 1274  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1038 +{{/expandable}}
1275 1275  
1276 -----
1040 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1041 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1042 +{{/expandable}}
1043 +{{/expandable}}
1277 1277  
1278 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1279 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1045 +{{expandable summary="
1280 1280  
1281 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1282 1282  
1283 -----
1284 -
1285 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1286 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1287 -{{/expand}}
1288 -
1289 -
1290 -== Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1291 -
1292 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1048 +Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1293 1293  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1294 1294  **Date of Publication:** *2003*
1295 1295  **Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
... ... @@ -1297,10 +1297,7 @@
1297 1297  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1298 1298  **Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1299 1299  
1300 -----
1301 -
1302 -## **Key Statistics**##
1303 -
1056 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1304 1304  1. **General Observations:**
1305 1305   - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1306 1306   - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
... ... @@ -1312,11 +1312,9 @@
1312 1312  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1313 1313   - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1314 1314   - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1068 +{{/expandable}}
1315 1315  
1316 -----
1317 -
1318 -## **Findings**##
1319 -
1070 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1320 1320  1. **Primary Observations:**
1321 1321   - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1322 1322   - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
... ... @@ -1328,11 +1328,9 @@
1328 1328  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1329 1329   - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1330 1330   - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1082 +{{/expandable}}
1331 1331  
1332 -----
1333 -
1334 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1335 -
1084 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1336 1336  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1337 1337   - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1338 1338   - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
... ... @@ -1344,39 +1344,29 @@
1344 1344  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1345 1345   - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1346 1346   - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1096 +{{/expandable}}
1347 1347  
1348 -----
1349 -
1350 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1098 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1351 1351  - Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1352 1352  - Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1353 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1101 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1102 +{{/expandable}}
1354 1354  
1355 -----
1356 -
1357 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1358 -
1104 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1359 1359  1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1360 1360  2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1361 1361  3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1108 +{{/expandable}}
1362 1362  
1363 -----
1110 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1111 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1112 +{{/expandable}}
1113 +{{/expandable}}
1364 1364  
1365 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1366 -This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
1115 +{{expandable summary="
1367 1367  
1368 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1369 1369  
1370 -----
1371 -
1372 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1373 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
1374 -{{/expand}}
1375 -
1376 -
1377 -== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1378 -
1379 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1118 +Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1380 1380  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1381 1381  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
1382 1382  **Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
... ... @@ -1384,10 +1384,7 @@
1384 1384  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1385 1385  **Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1386 1386  
1387 -----
1388 -
1389 -## **Key Statistics**##
1390 -
1126 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1391 1391  1. **General Observations:**
1392 1392   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1393 1393   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -1399,11 +1399,9 @@
1399 1399  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1400 1400   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1401 1401   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1138 +{{/expandable}}
1402 1402  
1403 -----
1404 -
1405 -## **Findings**##
1406 -
1140 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1407 1407  1. **Primary Observations:**
1408 1408   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1409 1409   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -1415,11 +1415,9 @@
1415 1415  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1416 1416   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1417 1417   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1152 +{{/expandable}}
1418 1418  
1419 -----
1420 -
1421 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1422 -
1154 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1423 1423  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1424 1424   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1425 1425   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1431,106 +1431,33 @@
1431 1431  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1432 1432   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1433 1433   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1166 +{{/expandable}}
1434 1434  
1435 -----
1436 -
1437 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1168 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1438 1438  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1439 1439  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1440 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1171 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1172 +{{/expandable}}
1441 1441  
1442 -----
1443 -
1444 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1445 -
1174 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1446 1446  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1447 1447  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1448 1448  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1178 +{{/expandable}}
1449 1449  
1450 -----
1180 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1181 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1182 +{{/expandable}}
1183 +{{/expandable}}
1451 1451  
1452 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1453 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1185 +{{expandable summary="
1454 1454  
1455 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1456 1456  
1457 -----
1188 +Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1189 +
1190 +{{/expandable}}
1458 1458  
1459 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1460 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1461 -{{/expand}}
1462 -
1463 -
1464 -== Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults ==
1465 -
1466 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1467 - Source: Addictive Behaviors
1468 -Date of Publication: 2016
1469 -Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
1470 -Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
1471 -DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
1472 -Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
1473 -
1474 -Key Statistics
1475 -General Observations:
1476 -
1477 -Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
1478 -Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
1479 -Subgroup Analysis:
1480 -
1481 -Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
1482 -Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
1483 -Other Significant Data Points:
1484 -
1485 -Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
1486 -Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
1487 -Findings
1488 -Primary Observations:
1489 -
1490 -Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
1491 -Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
1492 -Subgroup Trends:
1493 -
1494 -Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
1495 -College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
1496 -Specific Case Analysis:
1497 -
1498 -Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
1499 -Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
1500 -Critique and Observations
1501 -Strengths of the Study:
1502 -
1503 -Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
1504 -Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
1505 -Limitations of the Study:
1506 -
1507 -Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
1508 -Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
1509 -Suggestions for Improvement:
1510 -
1511 -Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
1512 -Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
1513 -Relevance to Subproject
1514 -Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
1515 -Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
1516 -Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
1517 -Suggestions for Further Exploration
1518 -Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
1519 -Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
1520 -Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
1521 -Summary of Research Study
1522 -This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
1523 -
1524 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1525 -
1526 -📄 Download Full Study
1527 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
1528 -{{/expand}}
1529 -
1530 -
1531 -== Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time? ==
1532 -
1533 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1192 +{{expandable summary="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1534 1534  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1535 1535  **Date of Publication:** *2014*
1536 1536  **Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
... ... @@ -1538,10 +1538,7 @@
1538 1538  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1539 1539  **Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1540 1540  
1541 -----
1542 -
1543 -## **Key Statistics**##
1544 -
1200 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1545 1545  1. **General Observations:**
1546 1546   - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1547 1547   - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
... ... @@ -1553,11 +1553,9 @@
1553 1553  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1554 1554   - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1555 1555   - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1212 +{{/expandable}}
1556 1556  
1557 -----
1558 -
1559 -## **Findings**##
1560 -
1214 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1561 1561  1. **Primary Observations:**
1562 1562   - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1563 1563   - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
... ... @@ -1569,11 +1569,9 @@
1569 1569  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1570 1570   - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1571 1571   - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1226 +{{/expandable}}
1572 1572  
1573 -----
1574 -
1575 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1576 -
1228 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1577 1577  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1578 1578   - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1579 1579   - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
... ... @@ -1585,41 +1585,31 @@
1585 1585  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1586 1586   - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1587 1587   - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1240 +{{/expandable}}
1588 1588  
1589 -----
1590 -
1591 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1242 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1592 1592  - Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1593 1593  - Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1594 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1245 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
1246 +{{/expandable}}
1595 1595  
1596 -----
1597 -
1598 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1599 -
1248 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1600 1600  1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1601 1601  2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1602 1602  3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1252 +{{/expandable}}
1603 1603  
1604 -----
1254 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1255 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
1256 +{{/expandable}}
1605 1605  
1606 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1607 -This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.  ##
1608 -
1609 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1610 -
1611 -----
1612 -
1613 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1614 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
1615 -{{/expand}}
1616 -
1617 -
1618 1618  = Whiteness & White Guilt =
1259 +{{/expandable}}
1619 1619  
1620 -== Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports ==
1261 +{{expandable summary="
1621 1621  
1622 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1263 +
1264 +Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1623 1623  **Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1624 1624  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
1625 1625  **Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
... ... @@ -1627,10 +1627,7 @@
1627 1627  **DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1628 1628  **Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1629 1629  
1630 -----
1631 -
1632 -## **Key Statistics**##
1633 -
1272 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1634 1634  1. **General Observations:**
1635 1635   - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1636 1636   - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
... ... @@ -1642,11 +1642,9 @@
1642 1642  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1643 1643   - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1644 1644   - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1284 +{{/expandable}}
1645 1645  
1646 -----
1647 -
1648 -## **Findings**##
1649 -
1286 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1650 1650  1. **Primary Observations:**
1651 1651   - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1652 1652   - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
... ... @@ -1658,11 +1658,9 @@
1658 1658  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1659 1659   - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1660 1660   - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1298 +{{/expandable}}
1661 1661  
1662 -----
1663 -
1664 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1665 -
1300 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1666 1666  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1667 1667   - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1668 1668   - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
... ... @@ -1674,39 +1674,29 @@
1674 1674  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1675 1675   - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1676 1676   - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1312 +{{/expandable}}
1677 1677  
1678 -----
1679 -
1680 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1314 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1681 1681  - Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1682 1682  - Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1683 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1317 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
1318 +{{/expandable}}
1684 1684  
1685 -----
1686 -
1687 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1688 -
1320 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1689 1689  1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1690 1690  2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1691 1691  3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1324 +{{/expandable}}
1692 1692  
1693 -----
1326 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1327 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
1328 +{{/expandable}}
1329 +{{/expandable}}
1694 1694  
1695 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1696 -This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
1331 +{{expandable summary="
1697 1697  
1698 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1699 1699  
1700 -----
1701 -
1702 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1703 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
1704 -{{/expand}}
1705 -
1706 -
1707 -== Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations ==
1708 -
1709 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1334 +Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1710 1710  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1711 1711  **Date of Publication:** *2016*
1712 1712  **Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
... ... @@ -1714,10 +1714,7 @@
1714 1714  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1715 1715  **Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1716 1716  
1717 -----
1718 -
1719 -## **Key Statistics**##
1720 -
1342 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1721 1721  1. **General Observations:**
1722 1722   - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1723 1723   - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
... ... @@ -1729,11 +1729,9 @@
1729 1729  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1730 1730   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1731 1731   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1354 +{{/expandable}}
1732 1732  
1733 -----
1734 -
1735 -## **Findings**##
1736 -
1356 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1737 1737  1. **Primary Observations:**
1738 1738   - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1739 1739   - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
... ... @@ -1745,11 +1745,9 @@
1745 1745  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1746 1746   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1747 1747   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1368 +{{/expandable}}
1748 1748  
1749 -----
1750 -
1751 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1752 -
1370 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1753 1753  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1754 1754   - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1755 1755   - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
... ... @@ -1761,39 +1761,29 @@
1761 1761  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1762 1762   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1763 1763   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1382 +{{/expandable}}
1764 1764  
1765 -----
1766 -
1767 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1384 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1768 1768  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1769 1769  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1770 -- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1387 +- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1388 +{{/expandable}}
1771 1771  
1772 -----
1773 -
1774 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1775 -
1390 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1776 1776  1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1777 1777  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1778 1778  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1394 +{{/expandable}}
1779 1779  
1780 -----
1396 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1397 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1398 +{{/expandable}}
1399 +{{/expandable}}
1781 1781  
1782 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1783 -This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
1401 +{{expandable summary="
1784 1784  
1785 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1786 1786  
1787 -----
1788 -
1789 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1790 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
1791 -{{/expand}}
1792 -
1793 -
1794 -== Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans ==
1795 -
1796 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1404 +Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1797 1797  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1798 1798  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
1799 1799  **Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
... ... @@ -1801,10 +1801,7 @@
1801 1801  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1802 1802  **Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1803 1803  
1804 -----
1805 -
1806 -## **Key Statistics**##
1807 -
1412 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1808 1808  1. **General Observations:**
1809 1809   - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1810 1810   - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
... ... @@ -1816,11 +1816,9 @@
1816 1816  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1817 1817   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1818 1818   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1424 +{{/expandable}}
1819 1819  
1820 -----
1821 -
1822 -## **Findings**##
1823 -
1426 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1824 1824  1. **Primary Observations:**
1825 1825   - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1826 1826   - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
... ... @@ -1832,11 +1832,9 @@
1832 1832  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1833 1833   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1834 1834   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1438 +{{/expandable}}
1835 1835  
1836 -----
1837 -
1838 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1839 -
1440 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1840 1840  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1841 1841   - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1842 1842   - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
... ... @@ -1848,39 +1848,29 @@
1848 1848  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1849 1849   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1850 1850   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1452 +{{/expandable}}
1851 1851  
1852 -----
1853 -
1854 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1454 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1855 1855  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1856 1856  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1857 -- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1457 +- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1458 +{{/expandable}}
1858 1858  
1859 -----
1860 -
1861 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1862 -
1460 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1863 1863  1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1864 1864  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1865 1865  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1464 +{{/expandable}}
1866 1866  
1867 -----
1466 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1467 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1468 +{{/expandable}}
1469 +{{/expandable}}
1868 1868  
1869 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1870 -This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
1471 +{{expandable summary="
1871 1871  
1872 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1873 1873  
1874 -----
1875 -
1876 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1877 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
1878 -{{/expand}}
1879 -
1880 -
1881 -== Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities? ==
1882 -
1883 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1474 +Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1884 1884  **Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1885 1885  **Date of Publication:** *2023*
1886 1886  **Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
... ... @@ -1888,10 +1888,7 @@
1888 1888  **DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1889 1889  **Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1890 1890  
1891 -----
1892 -
1893 -## **Key Statistics**##
1894 -
1482 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1895 1895  1. **General Observations:**
1896 1896   - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1897 1897   - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
... ... @@ -1903,11 +1903,9 @@
1903 1903  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1904 1904   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1905 1905   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1494 +{{/expandable}}
1906 1906  
1907 -----
1908 -
1909 -## **Findings**##
1910 -
1496 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1911 1911  1. **Primary Observations:**
1912 1912   - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1913 1913   - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
... ... @@ -1919,11 +1919,9 @@
1919 1919  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1920 1920   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1921 1921   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1508 +{{/expandable}}
1922 1922  
1923 -----
1924 -
1925 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1926 -
1510 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1927 1927  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1928 1928   - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1929 1929   - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
... ... @@ -1935,42 +1935,31 @@
1935 1935  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1936 1936   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1937 1937   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1522 +{{/expandable}}
1938 1938  
1939 -----
1940 -
1941 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1524 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1942 1942  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1943 1943  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1944 -- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
1527 +- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1528 +{{/expandable}}
1945 1945  
1946 -----
1947 -
1948 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1949 -
1530 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1950 1950  1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1951 1951  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1952 1952  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1534 +{{/expandable}}
1953 1953  
1954 -----
1536 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1537 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1538 +{{/expandable}}
1955 1955  
1956 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1957 -This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
1958 -
1959 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1960 -
1961 -----
1962 -
1963 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1964 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
1965 -{{/expand}}
1966 -
1967 -
1968 1968  = Media =
1541 +{{/expandable}}
1969 1969  
1543 +{{expandable summary="
1970 1970  
1971 -== Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic ==
1972 1972  
1973 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"}}
1546 +Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic"}}
1974 1974  **Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1975 1975  **Date of Publication:** *2021*
1976 1976  **Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
... ... @@ -1978,10 +1978,7 @@
1978 1978  **DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1979 1979  **Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1980 1980  
1981 -----
1982 -
1983 -## **Key Statistics**##
1984 -
1554 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1985 1985  1. **General Observations:**
1986 1986   - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1987 1987   - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
... ... @@ -1993,11 +1993,9 @@
1993 1993  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1994 1994   - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1995 1995   - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1566 +{{/expandable}}
1996 1996  
1997 -----
1998 -
1999 -## **Findings**##
2000 -
1568 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
2001 2001  1. **Primary Observations:**
2002 2002   - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
2003 2003   - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
... ... @@ -2009,11 +2009,9 @@
2009 2009  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
2010 2010   - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
2011 2011   - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1580 +{{/expandable}}
2012 2012  
2013 -----
2014 -
2015 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2016 -
1582 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
2017 2017  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2018 2018   - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
2019 2019   - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
... ... @@ -2025,37 +2025,29 @@
2025 2025  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
2026 2026   - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
2027 2027   - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1594 +{{/expandable}}
2028 2028  
2029 -----
2030 -
2031 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1596 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
2032 2032  - Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
2033 2033  - Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
2034 -- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
1599 +- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
1600 +{{/expandable}}
2035 2035  
2036 -----
2037 -
2038 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2039 -
1602 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
2040 2040  1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
2041 2041  2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
2042 2042  3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1606 +{{/expandable}}
2043 2043  
2044 -----
1608 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1609 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
1610 +{{/expandable}}
1611 +{{/expandable}}
2045 2045  
2046 -## **Summary of Research Study**
2047 -This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
1613 +{{expandable summary="
2048 2048  
2049 -----
2050 2050  
2051 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
2052 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
2053 -{{/expand}}
2054 -
2055 -
2056 -== Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions ==
2057 -
2058 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
1616 +Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
2059 2059  **Source:** *Politics & Policy*
2060 2060  **Date of Publication:** *2007*
2061 2061  **Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
... ... @@ -2063,10 +2063,7 @@
2063 2063  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
2064 2064  **Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
2065 2065  
2066 -----
2067 -
2068 -## **Key Statistics**##
2069 -
1624 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
2070 2070  1. **General Observations:**
2071 2071   - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
2072 2072   - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
... ... @@ -2078,11 +2078,9 @@
2078 2078  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
2079 2079   - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
2080 2080   - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
1636 +{{/expandable}}
2081 2081  
2082 -----
2083 -
2084 -## **Findings**##
2085 -
1638 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
2086 2086  1. **Primary Observations:**
2087 2087   - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
2088 2088   - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
... ... @@ -2094,11 +2094,9 @@
2094 2094  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
2095 2095   - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
2096 2096   - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
1650 +{{/expandable}}
2097 2097  
2098 -----
2099 -
2100 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2101 -
1652 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
2102 2102  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2103 2103   - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
2104 2104   - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
... ... @@ -2110,37 +2110,29 @@
2110 2110  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
2111 2111   - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
2112 2112   - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
1664 +{{/expandable}}
2113 2113  
2114 -----
2115 -
2116 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1666 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
2117 2117  - Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
2118 2118  - Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
2119 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
1669 +- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.
1670 +{{/expandable}}
2120 2120  
2121 -----
2122 -
2123 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2124 -
1672 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
2125 2125  1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
2126 2126  2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
2127 2127  3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
1676 +{{/expandable}}
2128 2128  
2129 -----
1678 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1679 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]
1680 +{{/expandable}}
1681 +{{/expandable}}
2130 2130  
2131 -## **Summary of Research Study**
2132 -This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
1683 +{{expandable summary="
2133 2133  
2134 -----
2135 2135  
2136 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
2137 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
2138 -{{/expand}}
2139 -
2140 -
2141 -== Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion ==
2142 -
2143 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
1686 +Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
2144 2144  **Source:** *Journal of Communication*
2145 2145  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
2146 2146  **Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
... ... @@ -2148,10 +2148,7 @@
2148 2148  **DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2149 2149  **Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
2150 2150  
2151 -----
2152 -
2153 -## **Key Statistics**##
2154 -
1694 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
2155 2155  1. **General Observations:**
2156 2156   - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
2157 2157   - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
... ... @@ -2163,11 +2163,9 @@
2163 2163  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
2164 2164   - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
2165 2165   - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
1706 +{{/expandable}}
2166 2166  
2167 -----
2168 -
2169 -## **Findings**##
2170 -
1708 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
2171 2171  1. **Primary Observations:**
2172 2172   - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
2173 2173   - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
... ... @@ -2179,11 +2179,9 @@
2179 2179  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
2180 2180   - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
2181 2181   - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
1720 +{{/expandable}}
2182 2182  
2183 -----
2184 -
2185 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2186 -
1722 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
2187 2187  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2188 2188   - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
2189 2189   - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
... ... @@ -2195,29 +2195,22 @@
2195 2195  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
2196 2196   - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
2197 2197   - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
1734 +{{/expandable}}
2198 2198  
2199 -----
2200 -
2201 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1736 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
2202 2202  - Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
2203 2203  - Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
2204 -- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
1739 +- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
1740 +{{/expandable}}
2205 2205  
2206 -----
2207 -
2208 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2209 -
1742 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
2210 2210  1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
2211 2211  2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
2212 2212  3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
1746 +{{/expandable}}
2213 2213  
2214 -----
2215 -
2216 -## **Summary of Research Study**
2217 -This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
2218 -
2219 -----
2220 -
2221 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
2222 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
2223 -{{/expand}}
1748 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1749 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
1750 +##~{~{/expand}}##
1751 +{{/expandable}}
1752 +{{/expandable}}