0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 88.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/30 12:03
Change comment: Uploaded new attachment "Cultural Voyeurism A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Intera.pdf", version 1.1
To version 80.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 06:49
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,112 +1,22 @@
1 1  = Research at a Glance =
2 2  
3 +== Introduction ==
3 3  
5 +Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various fields such as **social psychology, public policy, behavioral economics, and more**. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout.
4 4  
5 - Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various important Racial themes. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout. I wanted to make this for a couple of reasons. Number one is organization. There are a ton of useful studies out there that expose the truth, sometimes inadvertently. You'll notice that in this initial draft the summaries are often woke and reflect the bias of the AI writing them as well as the researchers politically correct conclusions in most cases. That's because I haven't gotten to going through and pointing out the reasons I put all of them in here.
7 +=== How to Use This Repository ===
6 6  
7 -
8 - There is often an underlying hypocrisy or double standard, saying the quiet part out loud, or conclusions that are so much of an antithesis to what the data shows that made me want to include it. At least, thats the idea for once its polished. I have about 150 more studies to upload, so it will be a few weeks before I get through it all. Until such time, feel free to search for them yourself and edit in what you find, or add your own studies. If you like you can do it manually, or if you'd rather go the route I did, just rename the study to its doi number and feed the study into an AI and tell them to summarize the study using the following format:
9 -
10 -{{example}}
11 -~= Study: [Study Title] =
12 -
13 -~{~{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
14 -~*~*Source:~*~* *[Journal/Institution Name]*
15 -~*~*Date of Publication:~*~* *[Publication Date]*
16 -~*~*Author(s):~*~* *[Author(s) Name(s)]*
17 -~*~*Title:~*~* *"[Study Title]"*
18 -~*~*DOI:~*~* [DOI or Link]
19 -~*~*Subject Matter:~*~* *[Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]*ย 
20 -
21 -~-~--
22 -
23 -~#~# ~*~*Key Statistics~*~*
24 -~1. ~*~*General Observations:~*~*
25 - - [Statistical finding or observation]
26 - - [Statistical finding or observation]
27 -
28 -2. ~*~*Subgroup Analysis:~*~*
29 - - [Breakdown of findings by gender, race, or other subgroups]
30 -
31 -3. ~*~*Other Significant Data Points:~*~*
32 - - [Any additional findings or significant statistics]
33 -
34 -~-~--
35 -
36 -~#~# ~*~*Findings~*~*
37 -~1. ~*~*Primary Observations:~*~*
38 - - [High-level findings or trends in the study]
39 -
40 -2. ~*~*Subgroup Trends:~*~*
41 - - [Disparities or differences highlighted in the study]
42 -
43 -3. ~*~*Specific Case Analysis:~*~*
44 - - [Detailed explanation of any notable specific findings]
45 -
46 -~-~--
47 -
48 -~#~# ~*~*Critique and Observations~*~*
49 -~1. ~*~*Strengths of the Study:~*~*
50 - - [Examples: strong methodology, large dataset, etc.]
51 -
52 -2. ~*~*Limitations of the Study:~*~*
53 - - [Examples: data gaps, lack of upstream analysis, etc.]
54 -
55 -3. ~*~*Suggestions for Improvement:~*~*
56 - - [Ideas for further research or addressing limitations]
57 -
58 -~-~--
59 -
60 -~#~# ~*~*Relevance to Subproject~*~*
61 -- [Explanation of how this study contributes to your subproject goals.]
62 -- [Any key arguments or findings that support or challenge your views.]
63 -
64 -~-~--
65 -
66 -~#~# ~*~*Suggestions for Further Exploration~*~*
67 -~1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
68 -2. [Potential studies or sources to complement this analysis.]
69 -
70 -~-~--
71 -
72 -~#~# ~*~*Summary of Research Study~*~*
73 -This study examines ~*~*[core research question or focus]~*~*, providing insights into ~*~*[main subject area]~*~*. The research utilized ~*~*[sample size and methodology]~*~* to assess ~*~*[key variables or measured outcomes]~*~*.ย 
74 -
75 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
76 -
77 -~-~--
78 -
79 -~#~# ~*~*๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study~*~*
80 -~{~{velocity}}
81 -#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
82 -#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
83 -#if($xwiki.exists("attach~:$filename"))
84 -~[~[Download Full Study>>attach~:$filename]]
85 -#else
86 -~{~{html}}<span style="color:red; font-weight:bold;">๐Ÿšจ PDF Not Available ๐Ÿšจ</span>~{~{/html}}
87 -#end
88 -~{~{/velocity}}
89 -
90 -~{~{/expand}}
91 -
92 -
93 -{{/example}}
94 -
95 -
96 -
97 97  - Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
98 98  - Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
99 99  - Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
100 100  - If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
101 -- You'll also find a download link to the original full study in pdf form at the bottom of the collapsible block.
102 102  
103 103  
104 -{{toc/}}
105 105  
106 106  
17 +== Research Studies Repository ==
107 107  
108 108  
109 -
110 110  = Genetics =
111 111  
112 112  
... ... @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
120 120  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
121 121  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*ย 
122 122  
123 -----
33 +-----
124 124  
125 125  ## **Key Statistics**##
126 126  
... ... @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
136 136   - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
137 137   - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
138 138  
139 -----
49 +-----
140 140  
141 141  ## **Findings**##
142 142  
... ... @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@
152 152   - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
153 153   - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
154 154  
155 -----
65 +-----
156 156  
157 157  ## **Critique and Observations**##
158 158  
... ... @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@
168 168   - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
169 169   - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
170 170  
171 -----
81 +-----
172 172  
173 173  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
174 174  - Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
... ... @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
175 175  - Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
176 176  - Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
177 177  
178 -----
88 +-----
179 179  
180 180  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
181 181  
... ... @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
183 183  2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
184 184  3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
185 185  
186 -----
96 +-----
187 187  
188 188  ## **Summary of Research Study**
189 189  This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populationsโ€”**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
... ... @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
190 190  
191 191  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
192 192  
193 -----
103 +-----
194 194  
195 195  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
196 196  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
207 207  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
208 208  **Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*ย 
209 209  
210 -----
120 +-----
211 211  
212 212  ## **Key Statistics**##
213 213  
... ... @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@
223 223   - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
224 224   - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
225 225  
226 -----
136 +-----
227 227  
228 228  ## **Findings**##
229 229  
... ... @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@
239 239   - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
240 240   - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
241 241  
242 -----
152 +-----
243 243  
244 244  ## **Critique and Observations**##
245 245  
... ... @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@
255 255   - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
256 256   - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
257 257  
258 -----
168 +-----
259 259  
260 260  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
261 261  - Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
... ... @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@
262 262  - Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
263 263  - Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
264 264  
265 -----
175 +-----
266 266  
267 267  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
268 268  
... ... @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@
270 270  2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
271 271  3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
272 272  
273 -----
183 +-----
274 274  
275 275  ## **Summary of Research Study**
276 276  This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
... ... @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@
277 277  
278 278  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
279 279  
280 -----
190 +-----
281 281  
282 282  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
283 283  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@
294 294  **DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
295 295  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*ย 
296 296  
297 -----
207 +-----
298 298  
299 299  ## **Key Statistics**##
300 300  
... ... @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@
310 310   - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
311 311   - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
312 312  
313 -----
223 +-----
314 314  
315 315  ## **Findings**##
316 316  
... ... @@ -326,7 +326,7 @@
326 326   - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
327 327   - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
328 328  
329 -----
239 +-----
330 330  
331 331  ## **Critique and Observations**##
332 332  
... ... @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@
342 342   - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
343 343   - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
344 344  
345 -----
255 +-----
346 346  
347 347  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
348 348  - Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
... ... @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@
349 349  - Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
350 350  - Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
351 351  
352 -----
262 +-----
353 353  
354 354  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
355 355  
... ... @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@
357 357  2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
358 358  3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
359 359  
360 -----
270 +-----
361 361  
362 362  ## **Summary of Research Study**
363 363  This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
... ... @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@
364 364  
365 365  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
366 366  
367 -----
277 +-----
368 368  
369 369  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
370 370  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@
381 381  **DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
382 382  **Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*ย 
383 383  
384 -----
294 +-----
385 385  
386 386  ## **Key Statistics**##
387 387  
... ... @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@
397 397   - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
398 398   - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
399 399  
400 -----
310 +-----
401 401  
402 402  ## **Findings**##
403 403  
... ... @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@
413 413   - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
414 414   - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
415 415  
416 -----
326 +-----
417 417  
418 418  ## **Critique and Observations**##
419 419  
... ... @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@
429 429   - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
430 430   - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
431 431  
432 -----
342 +-----
433 433  
434 434  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
435 435  - Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
... ... @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@
436 436  - Reinforces **Africaโ€™s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
437 437  - Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
438 438  
439 -----
349 +-----
440 440  
441 441  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
442 442  
... ... @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@
444 444  2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
445 445  3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
446 446  
447 -----
357 +-----
448 448  
449 449  ## **Summary of Research Study**
450 450  This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africaโ€™s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
... ... @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@
451 451  
452 452  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
453 453  
454 -----
364 +-----
455 455  
456 456  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
457 457  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@
468 468  **DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
469 469  **Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*ย 
470 470  
471 -----
381 +-----
472 472  
473 473  ## **Key Statistics**##
474 474  
... ... @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@
484 484   - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
485 485   - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
486 486  
487 -----
397 +-----
488 488  
489 489  ## **Findings**##
490 490  
... ... @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@
501 501   - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
502 502   - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
503 503  
504 -----
414 +-----
505 505  
506 506  ## **Critique and Observations**##
507 507  
... ... @@ -517,7 +517,7 @@
517 517   - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
518 518   - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
519 519  
520 -----
430 +-----
521 521  
522 522  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
523 523  - Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
... ... @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@
524 524  - Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
525 525  - Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
526 526  
527 -----
437 +-----
528 528  
529 529  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
530 530  
... ... @@ -532,12 +532,12 @@
532 532  2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
533 533  3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
534 534  
535 -----
445 +-----
536 536  
537 537  ## **Summary of Research Study**
538 538  This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
539 539  
540 -----
450 +-----
541 541  
542 542  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
543 543  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -554,7 +554,7 @@
554 554  **DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
555 555  **Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*ย 
556 556  
557 -----
467 +-----
558 558  
559 559  ## **Key Statistics**##
560 560  
... ... @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@
570 570   - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
571 571   - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
572 572  
573 -----
483 +-----
574 574  
575 575  ## **Findings**##
576 576  
... ... @@ -586,7 +586,7 @@
586 586   - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
587 587   - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
588 588  
589 -----
499 +-----
590 590  
591 591  ## **Critique and Observations**##
592 592  
... ... @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@
602 602   - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
603 603   - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
604 604  
605 -----
515 +-----
606 606  
607 607  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
608 608  - Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
... ... @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@
609 609  - Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
610 610  - Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
611 611  
612 -----
522 +-----
613 613  
614 614  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
615 615  
... ... @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@
617 617  2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
618 618  3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
619 619  
620 -----
530 +-----
621 621  
622 622  ## **Summary of Research Study**
623 623  This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
... ... @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@
624 624  
625 625  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
626 626  
627 -----
537 +-----
628 628  
629 629  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
630 630  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@
641 641  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
642 642  **Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*ย 
643 643  
644 -----
554 +-----
645 645  
646 646  ## **Key Statistics**##
647 647  
... ... @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@
657 657   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
658 658   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
659 659  
660 -----
570 +-----
661 661  
662 662  ## **Findings**##
663 663  
... ... @@ -673,7 +673,7 @@
673 673   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
674 674   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
675 675  
676 -----
586 +-----
677 677  
678 678  ## **Critique and Observations**##
679 679  
... ... @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@
689 689   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
690 690   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
691 691  
692 -----
602 +-----
693 693  
694 694  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
695 695  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
... ... @@ -696,7 +696,7 @@
696 696  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
697 697  - Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
698 698  
699 -----
609 +-----
700 700  
701 701  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
702 702  
... ... @@ -704,7 +704,7 @@
704 704  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
705 705  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
706 706  
707 -----
617 +-----
708 708  
709 709  ## **Summary of Research Study**
710 710  This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
... ... @@ -711,7 +711,7 @@
711 711  
712 712  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
713 713  
714 -----
624 +-----
715 715  
716 716  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
717 717  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -728,7 +728,7 @@
728 728  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
729 729  **Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*ย 
730 730  
731 -----
641 +-----
732 732  
733 733  ## **Key Statistics**##
734 734  
... ... @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@
744 744   - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
745 745   - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
746 746  
747 -----
657 +-----
748 748  
749 749  ## **Findings**##
750 750  
... ... @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@
760 760   - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
761 761   - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
762 762  
763 -----
673 +-----
764 764  
765 765  ## **Critique and Observations**##
766 766  
... ... @@ -776,7 +776,7 @@
776 776   - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
777 777   - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
778 778  
779 -----
689 +-----
780 780  
781 781  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
782 782  - Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
... ... @@ -783,7 +783,7 @@
783 783  - Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
784 784  - Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
785 785  
786 -----
696 +-----
787 787  
788 788  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
789 789  
... ... @@ -791,7 +791,7 @@
791 791  2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
792 792  3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
793 793  
794 -----
704 +-----
795 795  
796 796  ## **Summary of Research Study**
797 797  This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
... ... @@ -798,7 +798,7 @@
798 798  
799 799  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
800 800  
801 -----
711 +-----
802 802  
803 803  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
804 804  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -815,7 +815,7 @@
815 815  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
816 816  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*ย 
817 817  
818 -----
728 +-----
819 819  
820 820  ## **Key Statistics**##
821 821  
... ... @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@
831 831   - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
832 832   - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
833 833  
834 -----
744 +-----
835 835  
836 836  ## **Findings**##
837 837  
... ... @@ -847,7 +847,7 @@
847 847   - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
848 848   - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
849 849  
850 -----
760 +-----
851 851  
852 852  ## **Critique and Observations**##
853 853  
... ... @@ -863,7 +863,7 @@
863 863   - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
864 864   - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
865 865  
866 -----
776 +-----
867 867  
868 868  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
869 869  - Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
... ... @@ -870,7 +870,7 @@
870 870  - Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
871 871  - Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
872 872  
873 -----
783 +-----
874 874  
875 875  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
876 876  
... ... @@ -878,7 +878,7 @@
878 878  2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
879 879  3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
880 880  
881 -----
791 +-----
882 882  
883 883  ## **Summary of Research Study**
884 884  This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.ย  ##
... ... @@ -885,7 +885,7 @@
885 885  
886 886  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
887 887  
888 -----
798 +-----
889 889  
890 890  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
891 891  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -904,7 +904,7 @@
904 904  
905 905  **Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
906 906  
907 - **Key Statistics**
817 +=== **Key Statistics** ===
908 908  
909 909  1. **General Observations:**
910 910   - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
... ... @@ -914,12 +914,12 @@
914 914   - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
915 915   - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
916 916  
917 - **Findings**
827 +=== **Findings** ===
918 918  
919 919  - Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
920 920  - Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
921 921  
922 - **Relevance to Subproject**
832 +=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
923 923  
924 924  - Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
925 925  - Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
... ... @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@
926 926  {{/expand}}
927 927  
928 928  
929 -----
839 +-----
930 930  
931 931  = Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
932 932  
... ... @@ -941,7 +941,7 @@
941 941  **DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
942 942  **Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*ย 
943 943  
944 -----
854 +-----
945 945  
946 946  ## **Key Statistics**##
947 947  
... ... @@ -957,7 +957,7 @@
957 957   - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
958 958   - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
959 959  
960 -----
870 +-----
961 961  
962 962  ## **Findings**##
963 963  
... ... @@ -973,7 +973,7 @@
973 973   - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
974 974   - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
975 975  
976 -----
886 +-----
977 977  
978 978  ## **Critique and Observations**##
979 979  
... ... @@ -989,13 +989,13 @@
989 989   - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
990 990   - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
991 991  
992 -----
902 +-----
993 993  
994 994  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
995 995  - Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
996 996  - Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
997 997  
998 -----
908 +-----
999 999  
1000 1000  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1001 1001  
... ... @@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@
1002 1002  1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
1003 1003  2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
1004 1004  
1005 -----
915 +-----
1006 1006  
1007 1007  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1008 1008  This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.ย  ##
... ... @@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@
1009 1009  
1010 1010  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1011 1011  
1012 -----
922 +-----
1013 1013  
1014 1014  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1015 1015  {{velocity}}
... ... @@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@
1033 1033  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
1034 1034  **Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*ย 
1035 1035  
1036 -----
946 +-----
1037 1037  
1038 1038  ## **Key Statistics**##
1039 1039  
... ... @@ -1051,7 +1051,7 @@
1051 1051   - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
1052 1052   - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
1053 1053  
1054 -----
964 +-----
1055 1055  
1056 1056  ## **Findings**##
1057 1057  
... ... @@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@
1067 1067   - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
1068 1068   - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
1069 1069  
1070 -----
980 +-----
1071 1071  
1072 1072  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1073 1073  
... ... @@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@
1083 1083   - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
1084 1084   - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
1085 1085  
1086 -----
996 +-----
1087 1087  
1088 1088  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1089 1089  - Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
... ... @@ -1090,7 +1090,7 @@
1090 1090  - Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
1091 1091  - Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
1092 1092  
1093 -----
1003 +-----
1094 1094  
1095 1095  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1096 1096  
... ... @@ -1098,12 +1098,12 @@
1098 1098  2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
1099 1099  3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
1100 1100  
1101 -----
1011 +-----
1102 1102  
1103 1103  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1104 1104  This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
1105 1105  
1106 -----
1016 +-----
1107 1107  
1108 1108  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1109 1109  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@
1120 1120  **DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
1121 1121  **Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*ย 
1122 1122  
1123 -----
1033 +-----
1124 1124  
1125 1125  ## **Key Statistics**##
1126 1126  
... ... @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@
1136 1136   - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
1137 1137   - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
1138 1138  
1139 -----
1049 +-----
1140 1140  
1141 1141  ## **Findings**##
1142 1142  
... ... @@ -1152,7 +1152,7 @@
1152 1152   - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
1153 1153   - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
1154 1154  
1155 -----
1065 +-----
1156 1156  
1157 1157  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1158 1158  
... ... @@ -1168,7 +1168,7 @@
1168 1168   - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
1169 1169   - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
1170 1170  
1171 -----
1081 +-----
1172 1172  
1173 1173  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1174 1174  - Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
... ... @@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@
1175 1175  - Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
1176 1176  - Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
1177 1177  
1178 -----
1088 +-----
1179 1179  
1180 1180  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1181 1181  
... ... @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@
1183 1183  2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
1184 1184  3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
1185 1185  
1186 -----
1096 +-----
1187 1187  
1188 1188  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1189 1189  This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
... ... @@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@
1190 1190  
1191 1191  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1192 1192  
1193 -----
1103 +-----
1194 1194  
1195 1195  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1196 1196  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1210,7 +1210,7 @@
1210 1210  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1211 1211  **Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*ย 
1212 1212  
1213 -----
1123 +-----
1214 1214  
1215 1215  ## **Key Statistics**##
1216 1216  
... ... @@ -1226,7 +1226,7 @@
1226 1226   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1227 1227   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1228 1228  
1229 -----
1139 +-----
1230 1230  
1231 1231  ## **Findings**##
1232 1232  
... ... @@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@
1242 1242   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1243 1243   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1244 1244  
1245 -----
1155 +-----
1246 1246  
1247 1247  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1248 1248  
... ... @@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@
1258 1258   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1259 1259   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1260 1260  
1261 -----
1171 +-----
1262 1262  
1263 1263  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1264 1264  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
... ... @@ -1265,7 +1265,7 @@
1265 1265  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1266 1266  - Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1267 1267  
1268 -----
1178 +-----
1269 1269  
1270 1270  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1271 1271  
... ... @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@
1273 1273  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1274 1274  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1275 1275  
1276 -----
1186 +-----
1277 1277  
1278 1278  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1279 1279  This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
... ... @@ -1280,7 +1280,7 @@
1280 1280  
1281 1281  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1282 1282  
1283 -----
1193 +-----
1284 1284  
1285 1285  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1286 1286  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1297,7 +1297,7 @@
1297 1297  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1298 1298  **Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*ย 
1299 1299  
1300 -----
1210 +-----
1301 1301  
1302 1302  ## **Key Statistics**##
1303 1303  
... ... @@ -1313,7 +1313,7 @@
1313 1313   - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1314 1314   - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1315 1315  
1316 -----
1226 +-----
1317 1317  
1318 1318  ## **Findings**##
1319 1319  
... ... @@ -1329,7 +1329,7 @@
1329 1329   - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1330 1330   - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1331 1331  
1332 -----
1242 +-----
1333 1333  
1334 1334  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1335 1335  
... ... @@ -1345,7 +1345,7 @@
1345 1345   - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1346 1346   - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1347 1347  
1348 -----
1258 +-----
1349 1349  
1350 1350  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1351 1351  - Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
... ... @@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@
1352 1352  - Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1353 1353  - Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1354 1354  
1355 -----
1265 +-----
1356 1356  
1357 1357  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1358 1358  
... ... @@ -1360,7 +1360,7 @@
1360 1360  2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1361 1361  3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1362 1362  
1363 -----
1273 +-----
1364 1364  
1365 1365  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1366 1366  This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
... ... @@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@
1367 1367  
1368 1368  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1369 1369  
1370 -----
1280 +-----
1371 1371  
1372 1372  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1373 1373  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1384,7 +1384,7 @@
1384 1384  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1385 1385  **Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*ย 
1386 1386  
1387 -----
1297 +-----
1388 1388  
1389 1389  ## **Key Statistics**##
1390 1390  
... ... @@ -1400,7 +1400,7 @@
1400 1400   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1401 1401   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1402 1402  
1403 -----
1313 +-----
1404 1404  
1405 1405  ## **Findings**##
1406 1406  
... ... @@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@
1416 1416   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1417 1417   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1418 1418  
1419 -----
1329 +-----
1420 1420  
1421 1421  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1422 1422  
... ... @@ -1432,7 +1432,7 @@
1432 1432   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1433 1433   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1434 1434  
1435 -----
1345 +-----
1436 1436  
1437 1437  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1438 1438  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
... ... @@ -1439,7 +1439,7 @@
1439 1439  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1440 1440  - Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1441 1441  
1442 -----
1352 +-----
1443 1443  
1444 1444  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1445 1445  
... ... @@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@
1447 1447  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1448 1448  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1449 1449  
1450 -----
1360 +-----
1451 1451  
1452 1452  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1453 1453  This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
... ... @@ -1454,7 +1454,7 @@
1454 1454  
1455 1455  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1456 1456  
1457 -----
1367 +-----
1458 1458  
1459 1459  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1460 1460  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1538,7 +1538,7 @@
1538 1538  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1539 1539  **Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*ย 
1540 1540  
1541 -----
1451 +-----
1542 1542  
1543 1543  ## **Key Statistics**##
1544 1544  
... ... @@ -1554,7 +1554,7 @@
1554 1554   - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1555 1555   - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1556 1556  
1557 -----
1467 +-----
1558 1558  
1559 1559  ## **Findings**##
1560 1560  
... ... @@ -1570,7 +1570,7 @@
1570 1570   - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1571 1571   - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1572 1572  
1573 -----
1483 +-----
1574 1574  
1575 1575  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1576 1576  
... ... @@ -1586,7 +1586,7 @@
1586 1586   - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1587 1587   - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1588 1588  
1589 -----
1499 +-----
1590 1590  
1591 1591  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1592 1592  - Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
... ... @@ -1593,7 +1593,7 @@
1593 1593  - Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1594 1594  - Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1595 1595  
1596 -----
1506 +-----
1597 1597  
1598 1598  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1599 1599  
... ... @@ -1601,7 +1601,7 @@
1601 1601  2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1602 1602  3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1603 1603  
1604 -----
1514 +-----
1605 1605  
1606 1606  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1607 1607  This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.ย  ##
... ... @@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@
1608 1608  
1609 1609  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1610 1610  
1611 -----
1521 +-----
1612 1612  
1613 1613  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1614 1614  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1627,7 +1627,7 @@
1627 1627  **DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1628 1628  **Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*ย 
1629 1629  
1630 -----
1540 +-----
1631 1631  
1632 1632  ## **Key Statistics**##
1633 1633  
... ... @@ -1643,7 +1643,7 @@
1643 1643   - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1644 1644   - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1645 1645  
1646 -----
1556 +-----
1647 1647  
1648 1648  ## **Findings**##
1649 1649  
... ... @@ -1659,7 +1659,7 @@
1659 1659   - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1660 1660   - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1661 1661  
1662 -----
1572 +-----
1663 1663  
1664 1664  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1665 1665  
... ... @@ -1675,7 +1675,7 @@
1675 1675   - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1676 1676   - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1677 1677  
1678 -----
1588 +-----
1679 1679  
1680 1680  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1681 1681  - Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
... ... @@ -1682,7 +1682,7 @@
1682 1682  - Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1683 1683  - Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1684 1684  
1685 -----
1595 +-----
1686 1686  
1687 1687  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1688 1688  
... ... @@ -1690,7 +1690,7 @@
1690 1690  2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1691 1691  3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1692 1692  
1693 -----
1603 +-----
1694 1694  
1695 1695  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1696 1696  This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
... ... @@ -1697,7 +1697,7 @@
1697 1697  
1698 1698  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1699 1699  
1700 -----
1610 +-----
1701 1701  
1702 1702  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1703 1703  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1714,7 +1714,7 @@
1714 1714  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1715 1715  **Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*ย 
1716 1716  
1717 -----
1627 +-----
1718 1718  
1719 1719  ## **Key Statistics**##
1720 1720  
... ... @@ -1730,7 +1730,7 @@
1730 1730   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1731 1731   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1732 1732  
1733 -----
1643 +-----
1734 1734  
1735 1735  ## **Findings**##
1736 1736  
... ... @@ -1746,7 +1746,7 @@
1746 1746   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1747 1747   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1748 1748  
1749 -----
1659 +-----
1750 1750  
1751 1751  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1752 1752  
... ... @@ -1762,7 +1762,7 @@
1762 1762   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1763 1763   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1764 1764  
1765 -----
1675 +-----
1766 1766  
1767 1767  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1768 1768  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
... ... @@ -1769,7 +1769,7 @@
1769 1769  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1770 1770  - Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1771 1771  
1772 -----
1682 +-----
1773 1773  
1774 1774  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1775 1775  
... ... @@ -1777,7 +1777,7 @@
1777 1777  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1778 1778  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1779 1779  
1780 -----
1690 +-----
1781 1781  
1782 1782  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1783 1783  This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
... ... @@ -1784,7 +1784,7 @@
1784 1784  
1785 1785  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1786 1786  
1787 -----
1697 +-----
1788 1788  
1789 1789  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1790 1790  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1801,7 +1801,7 @@
1801 1801  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1802 1802  **Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*ย 
1803 1803  
1804 -----
1714 +-----
1805 1805  
1806 1806  ## **Key Statistics**##
1807 1807  
... ... @@ -1817,7 +1817,7 @@
1817 1817   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1818 1818   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1819 1819  
1820 -----
1730 +-----
1821 1821  
1822 1822  ## **Findings**##
1823 1823  
... ... @@ -1833,7 +1833,7 @@
1833 1833   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1834 1834   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1835 1835  
1836 -----
1746 +-----
1837 1837  
1838 1838  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1839 1839  
... ... @@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@
1849 1849   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1850 1850   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1851 1851  
1852 -----
1762 +-----
1853 1853  
1854 1854  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1855 1855  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
... ... @@ -1856,7 +1856,7 @@
1856 1856  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1857 1857  - Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1858 1858  
1859 -----
1769 +-----
1860 1860  
1861 1861  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1862 1862  
... ... @@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@
1864 1864  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1865 1865  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1866 1866  
1867 -----
1777 +-----
1868 1868  
1869 1869  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1870 1870  This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
... ... @@ -1871,7 +1871,7 @@
1871 1871  
1872 1872  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1873 1873  
1874 -----
1784 +-----
1875 1875  
1876 1876  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1877 1877  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1888,7 +1888,7 @@
1888 1888  **DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1889 1889  **Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*ย 
1890 1890  
1891 -----
1801 +-----
1892 1892  
1893 1893  ## **Key Statistics**##
1894 1894  
... ... @@ -1904,7 +1904,7 @@
1904 1904   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1905 1905   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1906 1906  
1907 -----
1817 +-----
1908 1908  
1909 1909  ## **Findings**##
1910 1910  
... ... @@ -1920,7 +1920,7 @@
1920 1920   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1921 1921   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1922 1922  
1923 -----
1833 +-----
1924 1924  
1925 1925  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1926 1926  
... ... @@ -1936,7 +1936,7 @@
1936 1936   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1937 1937   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1938 1938  
1939 -----
1849 +-----
1940 1940  
1941 1941  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1942 1942  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
... ... @@ -1943,7 +1943,7 @@
1943 1943  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1944 1944  - Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
1945 1945  
1946 -----
1856 +-----
1947 1947  
1948 1948  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1949 1949  
... ... @@ -1951,7 +1951,7 @@
1951 1951  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1952 1952  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1953 1953  
1954 -----
1864 +-----
1955 1955  
1956 1956  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1957 1957  This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
... ... @@ -1958,7 +1958,7 @@
1958 1958  
1959 1959  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1960 1960  
1961 -----
1871 +-----
1962 1962  
1963 1963  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1964 1964  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1978,7 +1978,7 @@
1978 1978  **DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1979 1979  **Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*ย 
1980 1980  
1981 -----
1891 +-----
1982 1982  
1983 1983  ## **Key Statistics**##
1984 1984  
... ... @@ -1994,7 +1994,7 @@
1994 1994   - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1995 1995   - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1996 1996  
1997 -----
1907 +-----
1998 1998  
1999 1999  ## **Findings**##
2000 2000  
... ... @@ -2010,7 +2010,7 @@
2010 2010   - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
2011 2011   - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
2012 2012  
2013 -----
1923 +-----
2014 2014  
2015 2015  ## **Critique and Observations**##
2016 2016  
... ... @@ -2026,7 +2026,7 @@
2026 2026   - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
2027 2027   - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
2028 2028  
2029 -----
1939 +-----
2030 2030  
2031 2031  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2032 2032  - Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
... ... @@ -2033,7 +2033,7 @@
2033 2033  - Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
2034 2034  - Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
2035 2035  
2036 -----
1946 +-----
2037 2037  
2038 2038  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2039 2039  
... ... @@ -2041,12 +2041,12 @@
2041 2041  2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
2042 2042  3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
2043 2043  
2044 -----
1954 +-----
2045 2045  
2046 2046  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2047 2047  This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
2048 2048  
2049 -----
1959 +-----
2050 2050  
2051 2051  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
2052 2052  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -2063,7 +2063,7 @@
2063 2063  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
2064 2064  **Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*ย 
2065 2065  
2066 -----
1976 +-----
2067 2067  
2068 2068  ## **Key Statistics**##
2069 2069  
... ... @@ -2079,7 +2079,7 @@
2079 2079   - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
2080 2080   - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
2081 2081  
2082 -----
1992 +-----
2083 2083  
2084 2084  ## **Findings**##
2085 2085  
... ... @@ -2095,7 +2095,7 @@
2095 2095   - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
2096 2096   - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
2097 2097  
2098 -----
2008 +-----
2099 2099  
2100 2100  ## **Critique and Observations**##
2101 2101  
... ... @@ -2111,7 +2111,7 @@
2111 2111   - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
2112 2112   - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
2113 2113  
2114 -----
2024 +-----
2115 2115  
2116 2116  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2117 2117  - Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
... ... @@ -2118,7 +2118,7 @@
2118 2118  - Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
2119 2119  - Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
2120 2120  
2121 -----
2031 +-----
2122 2122  
2123 2123  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2124 2124  
... ... @@ -2126,12 +2126,12 @@
2126 2126  2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
2127 2127  3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
2128 2128  
2129 -----
2039 +-----
2130 2130  
2131 2131  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2132 2132  This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
2133 2133  
2134 -----
2044 +-----
2135 2135  
2136 2136  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
2137 2137  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -2148,7 +2148,7 @@
2148 2148  **DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2149 2149  **Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*ย 
2150 2150  
2151 -----
2061 +-----
2152 2152  
2153 2153  ## **Key Statistics**##
2154 2154  
... ... @@ -2164,7 +2164,7 @@
2164 2164   - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
2165 2165   - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
2166 2166  
2167 -----
2077 +-----
2168 2168  
2169 2169  ## **Findings**##
2170 2170  
... ... @@ -2180,7 +2180,7 @@
2180 2180   - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
2181 2181   - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
2182 2182  
2183 -----
2093 +-----
2184 2184  
2185 2185  ## **Critique and Observations**##
2186 2186  
... ... @@ -2196,7 +2196,7 @@
2196 2196   - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
2197 2197   - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
2198 2198  
2199 -----
2109 +-----
2200 2200  
2201 2201  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2202 2202  - Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
... ... @@ -2203,7 +2203,7 @@
2203 2203  - Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
2204 2204  - Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
2205 2205  
2206 -----
2116 +-----
2207 2207  
2208 2208  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2209 2209  
... ... @@ -2211,13 +2211,15 @@
2211 2211  2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
2212 2212  3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
2213 2213  
2214 -----
2124 +-----
2215 2215  
2216 2216  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2217 2217  This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
2218 2218  
2219 -----
2129 +-----
2220 2220  
2221 2221  ## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
2222 2222  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
2223 2223  {{/expand}}
2134 +
2135 +
Cultural Voyeurism A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Intera.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -103.1 KB
Content