0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 84.2
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 07:13
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 76.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 05:33
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,540 +1,720 @@
1 1  = Research at a Glance =
2 2  
3 +== Introduction ==
3 3  
5 +Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various fields such as **social psychology, public policy, behavioral economics, and more**. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout.
4 4  
5 -Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various important Racial themes. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout. I wanted to make this for a couple of reasons. Number one is organization. There are a ton of useful studies out there that expose the truth, sometimes inadvertently. You'll notice that in this initial draft the summaries are often woke and reflect the bias of the AI writing them as well as the researchers politically correct conclusions in most cases. That's because I havent gotten to going through and pointing out the reasons I put all of them in here. There is often an underlying hypocrisy or double standar, saying the quiet part out loud, or conclusions that are so much of an antithesis to what the data shows that made me want to include it. At least, thats the idea for once its polished. I have about 150 more studies to upload, so it will be a few weeks before I get through it all. Until such time, feel free to search for them yourself and edit in what you find, or add your own studies. If you like you can do it manually, or if you'd rather go the route I did, just feed the study into an AI and tell them to summarize the study using the following format:
7 +=== How to Use This Repository ===
6 6  
7 -{{example}}
8 -~{~{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
9 -~*~*Source:~*~* [Journal/Institution Name]
10 -~*~*Date of Publication:~*~* [Publication Date]
11 -~*~*Author (s):~*~* [Author (s) Name (s)]
12 -~*~*Title:~*~* "[Study Title]"
13 -~*~*DOI:~*~* [DOI or Link]
14 -~*~*Subject Matter:~*~* [Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]
9 +- Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
10 +- Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
11 +- Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
12 +- If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
15 15  
16 -~-~--
17 17  
18 -~#~# ~*~*Key Statistics~*~*
19 -~1. ~*~*General Observations:~*~*
15 +
16 +== Research Studies Repository ==
17 +
18 +
19 += Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding =
20 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
21 +**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
22 +**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
23 +**Author(s):** Smith et al.
24 +**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
25 +**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
26 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
27 +
28 +**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
29 +
30 +=== **Key Statistics** ===
31 +
32 +1. **General Observations:**
33 + - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
34 + - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
35 +
36 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
37 + - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
38 + - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
39 +
40 +=== **Findings** ===
41 +
42 +- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
43 +- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
44 +
45 +=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
46 +
47 +- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
48 +- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
49 +{{/expand}}
50 +
51 +{{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
52 +**Source:** [Journal/Institution Name]
53 +**Date of Publication:** [Publication Date]
54 +**Author(s):** [Author(s) Name(s)]
55 +**Title:** "[Study Title]"
56 +**DOI:** [DOI or Link]
57 +**Subject Matter:** [Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]
58 +
59 +---
60 +
61 +## **Key Statistics**
62 +1. **General Observations:**
20 20   - [Statistical finding or observation]
21 21   - [Statistical finding or observation]
22 22  
23 -2. ~*~*Subgroup Analysis:~*~*
66 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
24 24   - [Breakdown of findings by gender, race, or other subgroups]
25 25  
26 -3. ~*~*Other Significant Data Points:~*~*
69 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
27 27   - [Any additional findings or significant statistics]
28 28  
29 -~-~--
72 +---
30 30  
31 -~#~# ~*~*Findings~*~*
32 -~1. ~*~*Primary Observations:~*~*
74 +## **Findings**
75 +1. **Primary Observations:**
33 33   - [High-level findings or trends in the study]
34 34  
35 -2. ~*~*Subgroup Trends:~*~*
78 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
36 36   - [Disparities or differences highlighted in the study]
37 37  
38 -3. ~*~*Specific Case Analysis:~*~*
81 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
39 39   - [Detailed explanation of any notable specific findings]
40 40  
41 -~-~--
84 +---
42 42  
43 -~#~# ~*~*Critique and Observations~*~*
44 -~1. ~*~*Strengths of the Study:~*~*
86 +## **Critique and Observations**
87 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
45 45   - [Examples: strong methodology, large dataset, etc.]
46 46  
47 -2. ~*~*Limitations of the Study:~*~*
90 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
48 48   - [Examples: data gaps, lack of upstream analysis, etc.]
49 49  
50 -3. ~*~*Suggestions for Improvement:~*~*
93 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
51 51   - [Ideas for further research or addressing limitations]
52 52  
53 -~-~--
96 +---
54 54  
55 -~#~# ~*~*Relevance to Subproject~*~*
98 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
56 56  - [Explanation of how this study contributes to your subproject goals.]
57 57  - [Any key arguments or findings that support or challenge your views.]
58 58  
59 -~-~--
102 +---
60 60  
61 -~#~# ~*~*Suggestions for Further Exploration~*~*
62 -~1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
104 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
105 +1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
63 63  2. [Potential studies or sources to complement this analysis.]
64 64  
65 -~-~--
108 +---
66 66  
67 -~#~# ~*~*Summary of Research Study~*~*
68 -This study examines ~*~*[core research question or focus]~*~*, providing insights into ~*~*[main subject area]~*~*. The research utilized ~*~*[sample size and methodology]~*~* to assess ~*~*[key variables or measured outcomes]~*~*.
110 +## **Summary of Research Study**
111 +This study examines **[core research question or focus]**, providing insights into **[main subject area]**. The research utilized **[sample size and methodology]** to assess **[key variables or measured outcomes]**.
69 69  
70 -~{~{/expand}}
71 -
72 -{{/example}}
113 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
73 73  
74 -- Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
75 -- Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
76 -- Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
77 -- If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
78 -- You'll also find a download link to the original full study in pdf form at the bottom of the collapsible block.
115 +---
79 79  
117 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
118 +{{velocity}}
119 +#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
120 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
121 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
122 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
123 +#else
124 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
125 +#end
126 +{{/velocity}}
80 80  
81 -{{toc/}}
128 +{{/expand}}
82 82  
130 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
83 83  
84 84  
85 85  
134 +---
86 86  
87 -= Genetics =
136 +{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}}
137 +**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
138 +**Date of Publication:** *2020*
139 +**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
140 +**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
141 +**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
142 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*
88 88  
144 +---
89 89  
90 -== Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History ==
146 +## **Key Statistics**
147 +1. **General Observations:**
148 + - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
149 + - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
91 91  
92 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
93 -**Source:** *Nature*
94 -**Date of Publication:** *2009*
95 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
96 -**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
97 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
98 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
151 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
152 + - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
153 + - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
99 99  
100 -----
155 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
156 + - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
157 + - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
101 101  
102 -## **Key Statistics**##
159 +---
103 103  
161 +## **Findings**
162 +1. **Primary Observations:**
163 + - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
164 + - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
165 +
166 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
167 + - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
168 + - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
169 +
170 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
171 + - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
172 + - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
173 +
174 +---
175 +
176 +## **Critique and Observations**
177 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
178 + - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
179 + - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
180 +
181 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
182 + - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
183 + - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
184 +
185 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
186 + - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
187 + - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
188 +
189 +---
190 +
191 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
192 +- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
193 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
194 +
195 +---
196 +
197 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
198 +1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
199 +2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
200 +
201 +---
202 +
203 +## **Summary of Research Study**
204 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.
205 +
206 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
207 +
208 +---
209 +
210 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
211 +{{velocity}}
212 +#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
213 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
214 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
215 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
216 +#else
217 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
218 +#end
219 +{{/velocity}}
220 +
221 +{{/expand}}
222 +
223 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
224 +
225 +
226 +{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}}
227 +**Source:** *Current Psychology*
228 +**Date of Publication:** *2024*
229 +**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
230 +**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
231 +**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
232 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
233 +
234 +---
235 +
236 +## **Key Statistics**
104 104  1. **General Observations:**
105 - - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
106 - - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
238 + - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
239 + - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
107 107  
108 108  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
109 - - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
110 - - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
242 + - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
243 + - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
111 111  
112 112  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
113 - - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
114 - - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
246 + - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
247 + - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
115 115  
116 -----
249 +---
117 117  
118 -## **Findings**##
119 -
251 +## **Findings**
120 120  1. **Primary Observations:**
121 - - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
122 - - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
253 + - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
254 + - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
123 123  
124 124  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
125 - - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
126 - - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
257 + - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
258 + - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
127 127  
128 128  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
129 - - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
130 - - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
261 + - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
262 + - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
131 131  
132 -----
264 +---
133 133  
134 -## **Critique and Observations**##
135 -
266 +## **Critique and Observations**
136 136  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
137 - - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
138 - - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
268 + - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
269 + - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
139 139  
140 140  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
141 - - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
142 - - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
272 + - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
273 + - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
143 143  
144 144  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
145 - - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
146 - - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
276 + - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
277 + - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
147 147  
148 -----
279 +---
149 149  
150 150  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
151 -- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
152 -- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
153 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
282 +- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
283 +- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
284 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
154 154  
155 -----
286 +---
156 156  
157 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
288 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
289 +1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
290 +2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
291 +3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
158 158  
159 -1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
160 -2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
161 -3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
293 +---
162 162  
163 -----
164 -
165 165  ## **Summary of Research Study**
166 -This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
296 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.
167 167  
168 168  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
169 169  
170 -----
300 +---
171 171  
172 172  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
173 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
303 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
304 +
174 174  {{/expand}}
175 175  
307 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
176 176  
177 -== Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations ==
309 +{{expand title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" expanded="false"}} Source: Addictive Behaviors
310 +Date of Publication: 2016
311 +Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
312 +Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
313 +DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
314 +Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
178 178  
179 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
180 -**Source:** *Nature*
181 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
182 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
183 -**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
184 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
185 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
316 +Key Statistics
317 +General Observations:
186 186  
187 -----
319 +Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
320 +Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
321 +Subgroup Analysis:
188 188  
189 -## **Key Statistics**##
323 +Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
324 +Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
325 +Other Significant Data Points:
190 190  
327 +Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
328 +Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
329 +Findings
330 +Primary Observations:
331 +
332 +Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
333 +Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
334 +Subgroup Trends:
335 +
336 +Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
337 +College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
338 +Specific Case Analysis:
339 +
340 +Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
341 +Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
342 +Critique and Observations
343 +Strengths of the Study:
344 +
345 +Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
346 +Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
347 +Limitations of the Study:
348 +
349 +Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
350 +Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
351 +Suggestions for Improvement:
352 +
353 +Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
354 +Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
355 +Relevance to Subproject
356 +Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
357 +Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
358 +Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
359 +Suggestions for Further Exploration
360 +Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
361 +Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
362 +Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
363 +Summary of Research Study
364 +This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
365 +
366 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
367 +
368 +📄 Download Full Study
369 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
370 +
371 +{{/expand}}
372 +
373 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
374 +
375 +{{expand title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?" expanded="false"}}
376 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
377 +**Date of Publication:** *2014*
378 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
379 +**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
380 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
381 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
382 +
383 +---
384 +
385 +## **Key Statistics**
191 191  1. **General Observations:**
192 - - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
193 - - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
387 + - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
388 + - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
194 194  
195 195  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
196 - - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
197 - - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
391 + - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
392 + - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
198 198  
199 199  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
200 - - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
201 - - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
395 + - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
396 + - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
202 202  
203 -----
398 +---
204 204  
205 -## **Findings**##
206 -
400 +## **Findings**
207 207  1. **Primary Observations:**
208 - - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
209 - - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
402 + - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
403 + - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
210 210  
211 211  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
212 - - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
213 - - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
406 + - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
407 + - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
214 214  
215 215  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
216 - - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
217 - - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
410 + - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
411 + - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
218 218  
219 -----
413 +---
220 220  
221 -## **Critique and Observations**##
222 -
415 +## **Critique and Observations**
223 223  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
224 - - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
225 - - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
417 + - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
418 + - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
226 226  
227 227  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
228 - - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
229 - - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
421 + - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
422 + - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
230 230  
231 231  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
232 - - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
233 - - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
425 + - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
426 + - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
234 234  
235 -----
428 +---
236 236  
237 237  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
238 -- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
239 -- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
240 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
431 +- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
432 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
433 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
241 241  
242 -----
435 +---
243 243  
244 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
437 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
438 +1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
439 +2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
440 +3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
245 245  
246 -1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
247 -2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
248 -3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
442 +---
249 249  
250 -----
251 -
252 252  ## **Summary of Research Study**
253 -This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
445 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.
254 254  
255 255  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
256 256  
257 -----
449 +---
258 258  
259 259  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
260 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
452 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
453 +
261 261  {{/expand}}
262 262  
456 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
263 263  
264 -== Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies ==
265 -
266 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
267 -**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
458 +{{expand title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation" expanded="false"}}
459 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
268 268  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
269 -**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
270 -**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
271 -**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
272 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
461 +**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
462 +**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
463 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
464 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
273 273  
274 -----
466 +---
275 275  
276 -## **Key Statistics**##
277 -
468 +## **Key Statistics**
278 278  1. **General Observations:**
279 - - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
280 - - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
470 + - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
471 + - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
281 281  
282 282  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
283 - - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
284 - - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
474 + - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
475 + - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
285 285  
286 286  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
287 - - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
288 - - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
478 + - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
479 + - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
289 289  
290 -----
481 +---
291 291  
292 -## **Findings**##
293 -
483 +## **Findings**
294 294  1. **Primary Observations:**
295 - - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
296 - - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
485 + - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
486 + - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
297 297  
298 298  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
299 - - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (70-80%)**.
300 - - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
489 + - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
490 + - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
301 301  
302 302  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
303 - - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
304 - - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
493 + - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
494 + - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
305 305  
306 -----
496 +---
307 307  
308 -## **Critique and Observations**##
309 -
498 +## **Critique and Observations**
310 310  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
311 - - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
312 - - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
500 + - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
501 + - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
313 313  
314 314  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
315 - - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
316 - - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
504 + - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
505 + - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
317 317  
318 318  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
319 - - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
320 - - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
508 + - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
509 + - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
321 321  
322 -----
511 +---
323 323  
324 324  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
325 -- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
326 -- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
327 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
514 +- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
515 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
516 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
328 328  
329 -----
518 +---
330 330  
331 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
520 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
521 +1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
522 +2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
523 +3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
332 332  
333 -1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
334 -2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
335 -3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
525 +---
336 336  
337 -----
338 -
339 339  ## **Summary of Research Study**
340 -This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
528 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.
341 341  
342 342  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
343 343  
344 -----
532 +---
345 345  
346 346  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
347 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
535 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
536 +
348 348  {{/expand}}
349 349  
539 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
350 350  
351 -== Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease ==
541 +{{expand title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media" expanded="false"}}
542 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
543 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
544 +**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
545 +**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
546 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
547 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
352 352  
353 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
354 -**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
355 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
356 -**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
357 -**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
358 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
359 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
549 +---
360 360  
361 -----
362 -
363 -## **Key Statistics**##
364 -
551 +## **Key Statistics**
365 365  1. **General Observations:**
366 - - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
367 - - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
553 + - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
554 + - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
368 368  
369 369  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
370 - - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
371 - - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
557 + - **90% of experts were from Western countries**, and **83% were male**.
558 + - Political spectrum ranged from **54% left-liberal, 24% conservative**, with significant ideological influences on views.
372 372  
373 373  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
374 - - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
375 - - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
561 + - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
562 + - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
376 376  
377 -----
564 +---
378 378  
379 -## **Findings**##
380 -
566 +## **Findings**
381 381  1. **Primary Observations:**
382 - - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
383 - - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
568 + - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
569 + - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
384 384  
385 385  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
386 - - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
387 - - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
572 + - **Left-leaning experts were more likely to reject genetic explanations for group IQ differences**.
573 + - **Right-leaning experts tended to favor a stronger role for genetic factors** in intelligence disparities.
388 388  
389 389  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
390 - - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
391 - - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
576 + - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
577 + - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
392 392  
393 -----
579 +---
394 394  
395 -## **Critique and Observations**##
396 -
581 +## **Critique and Observations**
397 397  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
398 - - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
399 - - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
583 + - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
584 + - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
400 400  
401 401  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
402 - - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
403 - - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
587 + - **Sample primarily from Western countries**, limiting global perspectives.
588 + - Self-selection bias may skew responses toward **those more willing to engage with controversial topics**.
404 404  
405 405  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
406 - - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
407 - - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
591 + - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
592 + - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
408 408  
409 -----
594 +---
410 410  
411 411  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
412 -- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
413 -- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
414 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
597 +- Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
598 +- Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
599 +- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
415 415  
416 -----
601 +---
417 417  
418 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
603 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
604 +1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
605 +2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
606 +3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
419 419  
420 -1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
421 -2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
422 -3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
608 +---
423 423  
424 -----
425 -
426 426  ## **Summary of Research Study**
427 -This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
611 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.
428 428  
429 429  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
430 430  
431 -----
615 +---
432 432  
433 433  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
434 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
618 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
619 +
435 435  {{/expand}}
436 436  
622 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
437 437  
438 -== Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA ==
624 +{{expand title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications" expanded="false"}}
625 +**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
626 +**Date of Publication:** *2010*
627 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
628 +**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
629 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
630 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
439 439  
440 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
441 -**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
442 -**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
443 -**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
444 -**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
445 -**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
446 -**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
632 +---
447 447  
448 -----
449 -
450 -## **Key Statistics**##
451 -
634 +## **Key Statistics**
452 452  1. **General Observations:**
453 - - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
454 - - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
636 + - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
637 + - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
455 455  
456 456  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
457 - - Examines **West Eurasian populations** and their genetic evolution.
458 - - Tracks **changes in allele frequencies over millennia**.
640 + - Discusses **four primary definitions of race/subspecies**: Essentialist, Taxonomic, Population-based, and Lineage-based.
641 + - Suggests that **human heterozygosity levels are comparable to species that are classified as polytypic**.
459 459  
460 460  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
461 - - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
462 - - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
644 + - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
645 + - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
463 463  
464 -----
647 +---
465 465  
466 -## **Findings**##
467 -
649 +## **Findings**
468 468  1. **Primary Observations:**
469 - - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
470 - - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
651 + - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
652 + - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
471 471  
472 472  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
473 - - Selection pressure on **energy storage genes** supports the **Thrifty Gene Hypothesis**.
474 - - **Cognitive performance-related alleles** have undergone selection, but their historical advantages remain unclear.
655 + - Discusses **how race concepts evolved over time** in biological sciences.
656 + - Compares **human diversity with that of other primates** such as chimpanzees and gorillas.
475 475  
476 476  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
477 - - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
478 - - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
479 - - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
659 + - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
660 + - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
480 480  
481 -----
662 +---
482 482  
483 -## **Critique and Observations**##
484 -
664 +## **Critique and Observations**
485 485  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
486 - - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
487 - - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
666 + - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
667 + - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
488 488  
489 489  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
490 - - Findings **may not translate directly** to modern populations.
491 - - **Unclear whether observed selection pressures persist today**.
670 + - Controversial topic with **strong opposing views in anthropology and genetics**.
671 + - **Relies on broad genetic trends**, but does not analyze individual-level genetic variation in depth.
492 492  
493 493  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
494 - - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
495 - - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
674 + - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
675 + - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
496 496  
497 -----
677 +---
498 498  
499 499  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
500 -- Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
501 -- Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
502 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
680 +- Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
681 +- Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
682 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
503 503  
504 -----
684 +---
505 505  
506 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
686 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
687 +1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
688 +2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
689 +3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
507 507  
508 -1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
509 -2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
510 -3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
691 +---
511 511  
512 -----
513 -
514 514  ## **Summary of Research Study**
515 -This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
694 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.
516 516  
517 -----
696 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
518 518  
698 +---
699 +
519 519  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
520 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
701 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
702 +
521 521  {{/expand}}
522 522  
705 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
523 523  
524 -== Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age ==
525 -
526 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
707 +{{expand title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age" expanded="false"}}
527 527  **Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
528 528  **Date of Publication:** *2013*
529 529  **Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
530 530  **Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
531 531  **DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
532 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
713 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
533 533  
534 -----
715 +---
535 535  
536 -## **Key Statistics**##
537 -
717 +## **Key Statistics**
538 538  1. **General Observations:**
539 539   - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
540 540   - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
... ... @@ -547,10 +547,9 @@
547 547   - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
548 548   - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
549 549  
550 -----
730 +---
551 551  
552 -## **Findings**##
553 -
732 +## **Findings**
554 554  1. **Primary Observations:**
555 555   - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
556 556   - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
... ... @@ -563,10 +563,9 @@
563 563   - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
564 564   - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
565 565  
566 -----
745 +---
567 567  
568 -## **Critique and Observations**##
569 -
747 +## **Critique and Observations**
570 570  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
571 571   - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
572 572   - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
... ... @@ -579,792 +579,715 @@
579 579   - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
580 580   - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
581 581  
582 -----
760 +---
583 583  
584 584  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
585 585  - Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
586 586  - Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
587 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
765 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
588 588  
589 -----
767 +---
590 590  
591 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
592 -
769 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
593 593  1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
594 594  2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
595 595  3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
596 596  
597 -----
774 +---
598 598  
599 599  ## **Summary of Research Study**
600 -This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
777 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.
601 601  
602 602  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
603 603  
604 -----
781 +---
605 605  
606 606  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
607 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
784 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
785 +
608 608  {{/expand}}
609 609  
788 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
610 610  
611 -== Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications ==
790 +{{expand title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports" expanded="false"}}
791 +**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
792 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
793 +**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
794 +**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
795 +**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
796 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
612 612  
613 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
614 -**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
615 -**Date of Publication:** *2010*
616 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
617 -**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
618 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
619 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
798 +---
620 620  
621 -----
622 -
623 -## **Key Statistics**##
624 -
800 +## **Key Statistics**
625 625  1. **General Observations:**
626 - - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
627 - - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
802 + - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
803 + - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
628 628  
629 629  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
630 - - Discusses **four primary definitions of race/subspecies**: Essentialist, Taxonomic, Population-based, and Lineage-based.
631 - - Suggests that **human heterozygosity levels are comparable to species that are classified as polytypic**.
806 + - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
807 + - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
632 632  
633 633  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
634 - - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
635 - - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
810 + - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
811 + - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
636 636  
637 -----
813 +---
638 638  
639 -## **Findings**##
640 -
815 +## **Findings**
641 641  1. **Primary Observations:**
642 - - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
643 - - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
817 + - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
818 + - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
644 644  
645 645  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
646 - - Discusses **how race concepts evolved over time** in biological sciences.
647 - - Compares **human diversity with that of other primates** such as chimpanzees and gorillas.
821 + - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
822 + - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
648 648  
649 649  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
650 - - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
651 - - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
825 + - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
826 + - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
652 652  
653 -----
828 +---
654 654  
655 -## **Critique and Observations**##
656 -
830 +## **Critique and Observations**
657 657  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
658 - - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
659 - - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
832 + - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
833 + - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
660 660  
661 661  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
662 - - Controversial topic with **strong opposing views in anthropology and genetics**.
663 - - **Relies on broad genetic trends**, but does not analyze individual-level genetic variation in depth.
836 + - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
837 + - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
664 664  
665 665  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
666 - - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
667 - - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
840 + - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
841 + - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
668 668  
669 -----
843 +---
670 670  
671 671  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
672 -- Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
673 -- Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
674 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
846 +- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
847 +- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
848 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
675 675  
676 -----
850 +---
677 677  
678 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
852 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
853 +1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
854 +2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
855 +3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
679 679  
680 -1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
681 -2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
682 -3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
857 +---
683 683  
684 -----
685 -
686 686  ## **Summary of Research Study**
687 -This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
860 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.
688 688  
689 689  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
690 690  
691 -----
864 +---
692 692  
693 693  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
694 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
867 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
868 +
695 695  {{/expand}}
696 696  
871 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
697 697  
698 -== Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media ==
873 +{{expand title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History" expanded="false"}}
874 +**Source:** *Nature*
875 +**Date of Publication:** *2009*
876 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
877 +**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
878 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
879 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*
699 699  
700 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
701 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
702 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
703 -**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
704 -**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
705 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
706 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
881 +---
707 707  
708 -----
709 -
710 -## **Key Statistics**##
711 -
883 +## **Key Statistics**
712 712  1. **General Observations:**
713 - - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
714 - - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
885 + - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
886 + - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
715 715  
716 716  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
717 - - **90% of experts were from Western countries**, and **83% were male**.
718 - - Political spectrum ranged from **54% left-liberal, 24% conservative**, with significant ideological influences on views.
889 + - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
890 + - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
719 719  
720 720  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
721 - - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
722 - - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
893 + - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
894 + - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
723 723  
724 -----
896 +---
725 725  
726 -## **Findings**##
727 -
898 +## **Findings**
728 728  1. **Primary Observations:**
729 - - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
730 - - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
900 + - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
901 + - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
731 731  
732 732  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
733 - - **Left-leaning experts were more likely to reject genetic explanations for group IQ differences**.
734 - - **Right-leaning experts tended to favor a stronger role for genetic factors** in intelligence disparities.
904 + - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
905 + - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
735 735  
736 736  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
737 - - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
738 - - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
908 + - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
909 + - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
739 739  
740 -----
911 +---
741 741  
742 -## **Critique and Observations**##
743 -
913 +## **Critique and Observations**
744 744  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
745 - - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
746 - - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
915 + - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
916 + - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
747 747  
748 748  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
749 - - **Sample primarily from Western countries**, limiting global perspectives.
750 - - Self-selection bias may skew responses toward **those more willing to engage with controversial topics**.
919 + - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
920 + - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
751 751  
752 752  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
753 - - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
754 - - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
923 + - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
924 + - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
755 755  
756 -----
926 +---
757 757  
758 758  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
759 -- Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
760 -- Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
761 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
929 +- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
930 +- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
931 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
762 762  
763 -----
933 +---
764 764  
765 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
935 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
936 +1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
937 +2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
938 +3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
766 766  
767 -1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
768 -2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
769 -3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
940 +---
770 770  
771 -----
772 -
773 773  ## **Summary of Research Study**
774 -This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
943 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.
775 775  
776 776  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
777 777  
778 -----
947 +---
779 779  
780 780  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
781 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
950 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
951 +
782 782  {{/expand}}
783 783  
954 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
784 784  
785 -== Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation ==
786 786  
787 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
788 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
789 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
790 -**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
791 -**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
792 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
793 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
957 +{{expand title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations" expanded="false"}}
958 +**Source:** *Nature*
959 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
960 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
961 +**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
962 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
963 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
794 794  
795 -----
965 +---
796 796  
797 -## **Key Statistics**##
798 -
967 +## **Key Statistics**
799 799  1. **General Observations:**
800 - - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
801 - - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
969 + - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
970 + - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
802 802  
803 803  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
804 - - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
805 - - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
973 + - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
974 + - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
806 806  
807 807  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
808 - - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
809 - - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
977 + - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
978 + - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
810 810  
811 -----
980 +---
812 812  
813 -## **Findings**##
814 -
982 +## **Findings**
815 815  1. **Primary Observations:**
816 - - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
817 - - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
984 + - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
985 + - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
818 818  
819 819  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
820 - - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
821 - - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
988 + - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
989 + - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
822 822  
823 823  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
824 - - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
825 - - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
992 + - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
993 + - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
826 826  
827 -----
995 +---
828 828  
829 -## **Critique and Observations**##
830 -
997 +## **Critique and Observations**
831 831  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
832 - - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
833 - - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
999 + - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
1000 + - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
834 834  
835 835  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
836 - - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
837 - - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
1003 + - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
1004 + - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
838 838  
839 839  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
840 - - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
841 - - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
1007 + - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
1008 + - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
842 842  
843 -----
1010 +---
844 844  
845 845  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
846 -- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
847 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
848 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
1013 +- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
1014 +- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
1015 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
849 849  
850 -----
1017 +---
851 851  
852 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1019 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1020 +1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
1021 +2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
1022 +3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
853 853  
854 -1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
855 -2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
856 -3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
1024 +---
857 857  
858 -----
859 -
860 860  ## **Summary of Research Study**
861 -This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.  ##
1027 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.
862 862  
863 863  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
864 864  
865 -----
1031 +---
866 866  
867 867  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
868 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
869 -{{/expand}}
1034 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
870 870  
871 -
872 -== Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding ==
873 -
874 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
875 -**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
876 -**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
877 -**Author(s):** Smith et al.
878 -**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
879 -**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
880 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science 
881 -
882 -**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
883 -
884 - **Key Statistics**
885 -
886 -1. **General Observations:**
887 - - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
888 - - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
889 -
890 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
891 - - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
892 - - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
893 -
894 - **Findings**
895 -
896 -- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
897 -- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
898 -
899 - **Relevance to Subproject**
900 -
901 -- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
902 -- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
903 903  {{/expand}}
904 904  
1038 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
905 905  
906 -----
1040 +{{expand title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies" expanded="false"}}
1041 +**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
1042 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1043 +**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
1044 +**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
1045 +**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
1046 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
907 907  
908 -= Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
1048 +---
909 909  
910 -
911 -== Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018 ==
912 -
913 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
914 -**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
915 -**Date of Publication:** *2020*
916 -**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
917 -**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
918 -**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
919 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
920 -
921 -----
922 -
923 -## **Key Statistics**##
924 -
1050 +## **Key Statistics**
925 925  1. **General Observations:**
926 - - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
927 - - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
1052 + - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
1053 + - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
928 928  
929 929  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
930 - - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
931 - - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
1056 + - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
1057 + - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
932 932  
933 933  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
934 - - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
935 - - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
1060 + - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
1061 + - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
936 936  
937 -----
1063 +---
938 938  
939 -## **Findings**##
940 -
1065 +## **Findings**
941 941  1. **Primary Observations:**
942 - - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
943 - - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
1067 + - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
1068 + - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
944 944  
945 945  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
946 - - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
947 - - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
1071 + - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (~70-80%)**.
1072 + - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
948 948  
949 949  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
950 - - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
951 - - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
1075 + - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
1076 + - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
952 952  
953 -----
1078 +---
954 954  
955 -## **Critique and Observations**##
956 -
1080 +## **Critique and Observations**
957 957  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
958 - - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
959 - - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
1082 + - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
1083 + - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
960 960  
961 961  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
962 - - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
963 - - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
1086 + - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
1087 + - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
964 964  
965 965  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
966 - - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
967 - - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
1090 + - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
1091 + - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
968 968  
969 -----
1093 +---
970 970  
971 971  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
972 -- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
973 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
1096 +- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
1097 +- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
1098 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
974 974  
975 -----
1100 +---
976 976  
977 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1102 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1103 +1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
1104 +2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
1105 +3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
978 978  
979 -1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
980 -2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
1107 +---
981 981  
982 -----
983 -
984 984  ## **Summary of Research Study**
985 -This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior ##
1110 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.
986 986  
987 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1112 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studys contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
988 988  
989 -----
1114 +---
990 990  
991 991  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
992 -{{velocity}}
993 -#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
994 -#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
995 -#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
996 -[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
997 -#else
998 -{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
999 -#end {{/velocity}}##
1117 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
1118 +
1000 1000  {{/expand}}
1001 1001  
1121 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1002 1002  
1003 -== Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ==
1123 +{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}}
1124 +**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
1125 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1126 +**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
1127 +**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
1128 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
1129 +**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*
1004 1004  
1005 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
1006 -**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
1007 -**Date of Publication:** *2012*
1008 -**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
1009 -**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
1010 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
1011 -**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
1131 +---
1012 1012  
1013 -----
1014 -
1015 -## **Key Statistics**##
1016 -
1133 +## **Key Statistics**
1017 1017  1. **General Observations:**
1018 - - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
1019 - - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
1135 + - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
1136 + - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
1020 1020  
1021 1021  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1022 - - **Maternal race had a stronger influence than paternal race** on birth outcomes.
1023 - - **Black mother–White father (BMWF) couples** had a higher risk than **White mother–Black father (WMBF) couples**.
1139 + - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
1140 + - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
1024 1024  
1025 1025  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1026 - - **Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for key outcomes:**
1027 - - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
1028 - - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
1029 - - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
1143 + - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
1144 + - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
1030 1030  
1031 -----
1146 +---
1032 1032  
1033 -## **Findings**##
1034 -
1148 +## **Findings**
1035 1035  1. **Primary Observations:**
1036 - - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
1037 - - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
1150 + - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
1151 + - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
1038 1038  
1039 1039  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1040 - - **Black mothers (regardless of paternal race) had the highest risk of LBW and PTB**.
1041 - - **White mothers with Black fathers had a lower risk** than Black mothers with White fathers.
1154 + - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
1155 + - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
1042 1042  
1043 1043  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1044 - - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
1045 - - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
1158 + - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
1159 + - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
1046 1046  
1047 -----
1161 +---
1048 1048  
1049 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1050 -
1163 +## **Critique and Observations**
1051 1051  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1052 - - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
1053 - - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
1165 + - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
1166 + - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
1054 1054  
1055 1055  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1056 - - Data limited to **Black-White biracial couples**, excluding other racial groups.
1057 - - **Socioeconomic and healthcare access factors** not fully explored.
1169 + - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
1170 + - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
1058 1058  
1059 1059  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1060 - - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
1061 - - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
1173 + - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
1174 + - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
1062 1062  
1063 -----
1176 +---
1064 1064  
1065 1065  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1066 -- Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
1067 -- Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
1068 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
1179 +- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
1180 +- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
1181 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
1069 1069  
1070 -----
1183 +---
1071 1071  
1072 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1185 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1186 +1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
1187 +2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
1188 +3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
1073 1073  
1074 -1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
1075 -2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
1076 -3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
1190 +---
1077 1077  
1078 -----
1079 -
1080 1080  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1081 -This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
1193 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.
1082 1082  
1083 -----
1195 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1084 1084  
1197 +---
1198 +
1085 1085  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1086 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
1200 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
1201 +
1087 1087  {{/expand}}
1088 1088  
1204 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1089 1089  
1090 -== Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness ==
1091 1091  
1092 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
1093 -**Source:** *Current Psychology*
1094 -**Date of Publication:** *2024*
1095 -**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
1096 -**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
1097 -**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
1098 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
1099 1099  
1100 -----
1208 +{{expand title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations" expanded="false"}}
1209 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1210 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1211 +**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1212 +**Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1213 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1214 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1101 1101  
1102 -## **Key Statistics**##
1216 +---
1103 1103  
1218 +## **Key Statistics**
1104 1104  1. **General Observations:**
1105 - - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
1106 - - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
1220 + - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1221 + - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
1107 1107  
1108 1108  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1109 - - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
1110 - - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
1224 + - **50% of medical students surveyed endorsed at least one false belief about biological differences**.
1225 + - Participants who held these false beliefs were **more likely to underestimate Black patients pain levels**.
1111 1111  
1112 1112  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1113 - - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
1114 - - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
1228 + - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1229 + - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1115 1115  
1116 -----
1231 +---
1117 1117  
1118 -## **Findings**##
1119 -
1233 +## **Findings**
1120 1120  1. **Primary Observations:**
1121 - - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
1122 - - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
1235 + - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1236 + - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
1123 1123  
1124 1124  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1125 - - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
1126 - - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
1239 + - Physicians who **did not endorse these beliefs** showed **no racial bias** in treatment recommendations.
1240 + - Bias was **strongest among first-year medical students** and decreased slightly in later years of training.
1127 1127  
1128 1128  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1129 - - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
1130 - - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
1243 + - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1244 + - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1131 1131  
1132 -----
1246 +---
1133 1133  
1134 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1135 -
1248 +## **Critique and Observations**
1136 1136  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1137 - - **First quantitative study** on incels social isolation and mental health.
1138 - - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
1250 + - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1251 + - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
1139 1139  
1140 1140  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1141 - - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
1142 - - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
1254 + - The study focuses on **Black vs. white disparities**, leaving other racial/ethnic groups unexplored.
1255 + - Participants' responses were based on **hypothetical medical cases, not real-world treatment decisions**.
1143 1143  
1144 1144  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1145 - - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
1146 - - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
1258 + - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1259 + - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1147 1147  
1148 -----
1261 +---
1149 1149  
1150 1150  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1151 -- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
1152 -- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
1153 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
1264 +- Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1265 +- Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1266 +- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1154 1154  
1155 -----
1268 +---
1156 1156  
1157 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1270 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1271 +1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1272 +2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1273 +3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1158 1158  
1159 -1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
1160 -2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
1161 -3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
1275 +---
1162 1162  
1163 -----
1164 -
1165 1165  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1166 -This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
1278 +This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.
1167 1167  
1168 1168  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1169 1169  
1170 -----
1282 +---
1171 1171  
1172 1172  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1173 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
1285 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1286 +
1174 1174  {{/expand}}
1175 1175  
1289 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1176 1176  
1177 -= Crime and Substance Abuse =
1178 1178  
1292 +{{expand title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans" expanded="false"}}
1293 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1294 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1295 +**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1296 +**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1297 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1298 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1179 1179  
1180 -== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1300 +---
1181 1181  
1182 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1183 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1184 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1185 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1186 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1187 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1188 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1189 -
1190 -----
1191 -
1192 -## **Key Statistics**##
1193 -
1302 +## **Key Statistics**
1194 1194  1. **General Observations:**
1195 - - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1196 - - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1304 + - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1305 + - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
1197 1197  
1198 1198  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1199 - - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1200 - - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1308 + - The increase was **most pronounced among those with a high school education or less**.
1309 + - Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic mortality continued to decline over the same period.
1201 1201  
1202 1202  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1203 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1204 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1312 + - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1313 + - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1205 1205  
1206 -----
1315 +---
1207 1207  
1208 -## **Findings**##
1209 -
1317 +## **Findings**
1210 1210  1. **Primary Observations:**
1211 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1212 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1319 + - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1320 + - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
1213 1213  
1214 1214  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1215 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1216 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1323 + - The **largest mortality increases** occurred among **whites without a college degree**.
1324 + - Chronic pain, functional limitations, and self-reported mental distress **rose significantly in affected groups**.
1217 1217  
1218 1218  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1219 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1220 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1327 + - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1328 + - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1221 1221  
1222 -----
1330 +---
1223 1223  
1224 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1225 -
1332 +## **Critique and Observations**
1226 1226  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1227 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1228 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1334 + - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1335 + - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
1229 1229  
1230 1230  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1231 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1232 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1338 + - Does not establish **causality** between economic decline and increased mortality.
1339 + - Lacks **granular data on opioid prescribing patterns and regional differences**.
1233 1233  
1234 1234  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1235 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1236 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1342 + - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1343 + - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1237 1237  
1238 -----
1345 +---
1239 1239  
1240 1240  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1241 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1242 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1243 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1348 +- Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1349 +- Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1350 +- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1244 1244  
1245 -----
1352 +---
1246 1246  
1247 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1354 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1355 +1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1356 +2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1357 +3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1248 1248  
1249 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1250 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1251 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1359 +---
1252 1252  
1253 -----
1254 -
1255 1255  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1256 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1362 +This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.
1257 1257  
1258 1258  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1259 1259  
1260 -----
1366 +---
1261 1261  
1262 1262  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1263 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1369 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1370 +
1264 1264  {{/expand}}
1265 1265  
1373 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1266 1266  
1267 -== Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1375 +{{expand title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?" expanded="false"}}
1376 +**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1377 +**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1378 +**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1379 +**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1380 +**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1381 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1268 1268  
1269 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1270 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1271 -**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1272 -**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1273 -**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1274 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1275 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1383 +---
1276 1276  
1277 -----
1278 -
1279 -## **Key Statistics**##
1280 -
1385 +## **Key Statistics**
1281 1281  1. **General Observations:**
1282 - - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1283 - - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1387 + - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1388 + - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
1284 1284  
1285 1285  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1286 - - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1287 - - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1391 + - Explores differences in **integration, social interactions, and perceptions of diversity**.
1392 + - Studies how **class, education, and neighborhood composition** affect adaptation to urban diversity.
1288 1288  
1289 1289  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1290 - - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1291 - - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1395 + - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1396 + - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1292 1292  
1293 -----
1398 +---
1294 1294  
1295 -## **Findings**##
1296 -
1400 +## **Findings**
1297 1297  1. **Primary Observations:**
1298 - - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1299 - - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1402 + - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1403 + - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
1300 1300  
1301 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1302 - - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1303 - - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1405 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1406 + - Young, educated individuals in urban areas **are more open to cultural diversity**.
1407 + - Older and less mobile residents **report feelings of displacement and social isolation**.
1304 1304  
1305 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1306 - - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1307 - - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1409 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1410 + - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1411 + - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1308 1308  
1309 -----
1413 +---
1310 1310  
1311 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1415 +## **Critique and Observations**
1416 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1417 + - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1418 + - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
1312 1312  
1313 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1314 - - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1315 - - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1420 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1421 + - Limited to **Western European urban settings**, missing perspectives from other global regions.
1422 + - Does not fully explore **policy interventions for fostering social cohesion**.
1316 1316  
1317 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1318 - - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1319 - - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1424 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1425 + - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1426 + - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1320 1320  
1321 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1322 - - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1323 - - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1428 +---
1324 1324  
1325 -----
1326 -
1327 1327  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1328 -- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1329 -- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1330 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1431 +- Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1432 +- Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1433 +- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1331 1331  
1332 -----
1435 +---
1333 1333  
1334 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1437 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1438 +1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1439 +2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1440 +3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1335 1335  
1336 -1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1337 -2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1338 -3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1442 +---
1339 1339  
1340 -----
1341 -
1342 1342  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1343 -This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
1445 +This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.
1344 1344  
1345 1345  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1346 1346  
1347 -----
1449 +---
1348 1348  
1349 1349  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1350 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
1452 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1453 +
1351 1351  {{/expand}}
1352 1352  
1456 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1353 1353  
1354 -== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1355 -
1356 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1458 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1357 1357  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1358 1358  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
1359 1359  **Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1360 1360  **Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1361 1361  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1362 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1464 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1363 1363  
1364 -----
1466 +---
1365 1365  
1366 -## **Key Statistics**##
1367 -
1468 +## **Key Statistics**
1368 1368  1. **General Observations:**
1369 1369   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1370 1370   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -1377,10 +1377,9 @@
1377 1377   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1378 1378   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1379 1379  
1380 -----
1481 +---
1381 1381  
1382 -## **Findings**##
1383 -
1483 +## **Findings**
1384 1384  1. **Primary Observations:**
1385 1385   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1386 1386   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -1393,10 +1393,9 @@
1393 1393   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1394 1394   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1395 1395  
1396 -----
1496 +---
1397 1397  
1398 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1399 -
1498 +## **Critique and Observations**
1400 1400  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1401 1401   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1402 1402   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1409,641 +1409,625 @@
1409 1409   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1410 1410   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1411 1411  
1412 -----
1511 +---
1413 1413  
1414 1414  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1415 1415  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1416 1416  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1417 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1516 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1418 1418  
1419 -----
1518 +---
1420 1420  
1421 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1422 -
1520 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1423 1423  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1424 1424  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1425 1425  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1426 1426  
1427 -----
1525 +---
1428 1428  
1429 1429  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1430 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1528 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1431 1431  
1432 1432  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1433 1433  
1434 -----
1532 +---
1435 1435  
1436 1436  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1437 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1535 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1536 +
1438 1438  {{/expand}}
1439 1439  
1539 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1440 1440  
1441 -== Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults ==
1442 1442  
1443 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1444 - Source: Addictive Behaviors
1445 -Date of Publication: 2016
1446 -Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
1447 -Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
1448 -DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
1449 -Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
1542 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1543 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1544 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1545 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1546 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1547 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1548 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1450 1450  
1451 -Key Statistics
1452 -General Observations:
1550 +---
1453 1453  
1454 -Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
1455 -Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
1456 -Subgroup Analysis:
1552 +## **Key Statistics**
1553 +1. **General Observations:**
1554 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1555 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1457 1457  
1458 -Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
1459 -Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
1460 -Other Significant Data Points:
1557 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1558 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1559 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1461 1461  
1462 -Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
1463 -Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
1464 -Findings
1465 -Primary Observations:
1561 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1562 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1563 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1466 1466  
1467 -Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
1468 -Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
1469 -Subgroup Trends:
1565 +---
1470 1470  
1471 -Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
1472 -College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
1473 -Specific Case Analysis:
1567 +## **Findings**
1568 +1. **Primary Observations:**
1569 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1570 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1474 1474  
1475 -Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
1476 -Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
1477 -Critique and Observations
1478 -Strengths of the Study:
1572 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1573 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1574 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1479 1479  
1480 -Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
1481 -Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
1482 -Limitations of the Study:
1576 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1577 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1578 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1483 1483  
1484 -Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
1485 -Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
1486 -Suggestions for Improvement:
1580 +---
1487 1487  
1488 -Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
1489 -Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
1490 -Relevance to Subproject
1491 -Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
1492 -Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
1493 -Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
1494 -Suggestions for Further Exploration
1495 -Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
1496 -Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
1497 -Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
1498 -Summary of Research Study
1499 -This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
1582 +## **Critique and Observations**
1583 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1584 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1585 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1500 1500  
1587 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1588 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1589 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1590 +
1591 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1592 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1593 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1594 +
1595 +---
1596 +
1597 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1598 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1599 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1600 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1601 +
1602 +---
1603 +
1604 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1605 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1606 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1607 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1608 +
1609 +---
1610 +
1611 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1612 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1613 +
1501 1501  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1502 1502  
1503 -📄 Download Full Study
1504 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
1505 -{{/expand}}
1616 +---
1506 1506  
1618 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1619 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1507 1507  
1508 -== Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time? ==
1621 +{{/expand}}
1509 1509  
1510 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1511 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1512 -**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1513 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1514 -**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1515 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1516 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1623 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1517 1517  
1518 -----
1625 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1626 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1627 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1628 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1629 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1630 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1631 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1519 1519  
1520 -## **Key Statistics**##
1633 +---
1521 1521  
1635 +## **Key Statistics**
1522 1522  1. **General Observations:**
1523 - - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1524 - - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
1637 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1638 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1525 1525  
1526 1526  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1527 - - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
1528 - - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
1641 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1642 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1529 1529  
1530 1530  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1531 - - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1532 - - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1645 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1646 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1533 1533  
1534 -----
1648 +---
1535 1535  
1536 -## **Findings**##
1537 -
1650 +## **Findings**
1538 1538  1. **Primary Observations:**
1539 - - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1540 - - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
1652 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1653 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1541 1541  
1542 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1543 - - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
1544 - - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
1655 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1656 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1657 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1545 1545  
1546 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1547 - - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1548 - - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1659 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1660 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1661 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1549 1549  
1550 -----
1663 +---
1551 1551  
1552 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1665 +## **Critique and Observations**
1666 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1667 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1668 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1553 1553  
1554 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1555 - - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1556 - - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
1670 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1671 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1672 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1557 1557  
1558 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1559 - - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
1560 - - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
1674 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1675 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1676 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1561 1561  
1562 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1563 - - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1564 - - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1678 +---
1565 1565  
1566 -----
1567 -
1568 1568  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1569 -- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1570 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1571 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1681 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1682 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1683 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1572 1572  
1573 -----
1685 +---
1574 1574  
1575 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1687 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1688 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1689 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1690 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1576 1576  
1577 -1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1578 -2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1579 -3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1692 +---
1580 1580  
1581 -----
1582 -
1583 1583  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1584 -This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.  ##
1695 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1585 1585  
1586 1586  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1587 1587  
1588 -----
1699 +---
1589 1589  
1590 1590  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1591 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
1702 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1703 +
1592 1592  {{/expand}}
1593 1593  
1706 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1594 1594  
1595 -= Whiteness & White Guilt =
1708 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1709 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1710 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1711 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1712 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1713 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1714 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1596 1596  
1597 -== Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports ==
1716 +---
1598 1598  
1599 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1600 -**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1601 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1602 -**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1603 -**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1604 -**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1605 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1606 -
1607 -----
1608 -
1609 -## **Key Statistics**##
1610 -
1718 +## **Key Statistics**
1611 1611  1. **General Observations:**
1612 - - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1613 - - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
1720 + - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1721 + - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1614 1614  
1615 1615  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1616 - - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
1617 - - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
1724 + - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1725 + - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1618 1618  
1619 1619  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1620 - - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1621 - - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1728 + - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1729 + - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1622 1622  
1623 -----
1731 +---
1624 1624  
1625 -## **Findings**##
1626 -
1733 +## **Findings**
1627 1627  1. **Primary Observations:**
1628 - - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1629 - - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
1735 + - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1736 + - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1630 1630  
1631 1631  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1632 - - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
1633 - - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
1739 + - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1740 + - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1634 1634  
1635 1635  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1636 - - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1637 - - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1743 + - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1744 + - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1638 1638  
1639 -----
1746 +---
1640 1640  
1641 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1642 -
1748 +## **Critique and Observations**
1643 1643  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1644 - - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1645 - - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
1750 + - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1751 + - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1646 1646  
1647 1647  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1648 - - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
1649 - - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
1754 + - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1755 + - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1650 1650  
1651 1651  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1652 - - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1653 - - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1758 + - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1759 + - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1654 1654  
1655 -----
1761 +---
1656 1656  
1657 1657  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1658 -- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1659 -- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1660 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1764 +- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1765 +- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1766 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1661 1661  
1662 -----
1768 +---
1663 1663  
1664 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1770 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1771 +1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1772 +2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1773 +3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1665 1665  
1666 -1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1667 -2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1668 -3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1775 +---
1669 1669  
1670 -----
1671 -
1672 1672  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1673 -This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
1778 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1674 1674  
1675 1675  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1676 1676  
1677 -----
1782 +---
1678 1678  
1679 1679  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1680 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
1785 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1786 +
1681 1681  {{/expand}}
1682 1682  
1789 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1683 1683  
1684 -== Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations ==
1791 +{{expand title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict" expanded="false"}}
1792 +**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1793 +**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1794 +**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1795 +**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1796 +**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1797 +**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*
1685 1685  
1686 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1687 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1688 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1689 -**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1690 -**Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1691 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1692 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1799 +---
1693 1693  
1694 -----
1695 -
1696 -## **Key Statistics**##
1697 -
1801 +## **Key Statistics**
1698 1698  1. **General Observations:**
1699 - - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1700 - - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
1803 + - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1804 + - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
1701 1701  
1702 1702  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1703 - - **50% of medical students surveyed endorsed at least one false belief about biological differences**.
1704 - - Participants who held these false beliefs were **more likely to underestimate Black patients’ pain levels**.
1807 + - **Anonymity and reduced social cues** in CMC increased hostility.
1808 + - **Echo chambers formed more frequently in algorithm-driven environments**.
1705 1705  
1706 1706  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1707 - - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1708 - - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1811 + - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1812 + - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1709 1709  
1710 -----
1814 +---
1711 1711  
1712 -## **Findings**##
1713 -
1816 +## **Findings**
1714 1714  1. **Primary Observations:**
1715 - - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1716 - - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
1818 + - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1819 + - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
1717 1717  
1718 1718  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1719 - - Physicians who **did not endorse these beliefs** showed **no racial bias** in treatment recommendations.
1720 - - Bias was **strongest among first-year medical students** and decreased slightly in later years of training.
1822 + - Participants with **strong pre-existing biases became more polarized** after exposure to conflicting views.
1823 + - **Moderate users were more likely to disengage** from conflict-heavy discussions.
1721 1721  
1722 1722  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1723 - - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1724 - - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1826 + - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1827 + - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1725 1725  
1726 -----
1829 +---
1727 1727  
1728 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1729 -
1831 +## **Critique and Observations**
1730 1730  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1731 - - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1732 - - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
1833 + - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1834 + - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
1733 1733  
1734 1734  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1735 - - The study focuses on **Black vs. white disparities**, leaving other racial/ethnic groups unexplored.
1736 - - Participants' responses were based on **hypothetical medical cases, not real-world treatment decisions**.
1837 + - Lacks **qualitative analysis of user motivations**.
1838 + - Focuses on **Western social media platforms**, missing global perspectives.
1737 1737  
1738 1738  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1739 - - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1740 - - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1841 + - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1842 + - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1741 1741  
1742 -----
1844 +---
1743 1743  
1744 1744  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1745 -- Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1746 -- Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1747 -- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1847 +- Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
1848 +- Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1849 +- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
1748 1748  
1749 -----
1851 +---
1750 1750  
1751 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1853 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1854 +1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
1855 +2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1856 +3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1752 1752  
1753 -1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1754 -2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1755 -3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1858 +---
1756 1756  
1757 -----
1758 -
1759 1759  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1760 -This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
1861 +This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.
1761 1761  
1762 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1863 +---
1763 1763  
1764 -----
1765 -
1766 1766  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1767 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
1866 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
1867 +
1768 1768  {{/expand}}
1769 1769  
1870 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1770 1770  
1771 -== Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans ==
1772 1772  
1773 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1774 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1775 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1776 -**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1777 -**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1778 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1779 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1873 +{{expand title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion" expanded="false"}}
1874 +**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
1875 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1876 +**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
1877 +**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
1878 +**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
1879 +**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*
1780 1780  
1781 -----
1881 +---
1782 1782  
1783 -## **Key Statistics**##
1784 -
1883 +## **Key Statistics**
1785 1785  1. **General Observations:**
1786 - - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1787 - - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
1885 + - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
1886 + - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
1788 1788  
1789 1789  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1790 - - The increase was **most pronounced among those with a high school education or less**.
1791 - - Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic mortality continued to decline over the same period.
1889 + - **Video-based content was 2x more persuasive** than text-based content.
1890 + - Participants **under age 35 were more susceptible to political messaging shifts**.
1792 1792  
1793 1793  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1794 - - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1795 - - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1893 + - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
1894 + - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
1796 1796  
1797 -----
1896 +---
1798 1798  
1799 -## **Findings**##
1800 -
1898 +## **Findings**
1801 1801  1. **Primary Observations:**
1802 - - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1803 - - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
1900 + - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
1901 + - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
1804 1804  
1805 1805  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1806 - - The **largest mortality increases** occurred among **whites without a college degree**.
1807 - - Chronic pain, functional limitations, and self-reported mental distress **rose significantly in affected groups**.
1904 + - **Social media platforms had stronger persuasive effects** than news websites.
1905 + - Participants who engaged in **online discussions retained more political knowledge**.
1808 1808  
1809 1809  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1810 - - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1811 - - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1908 + - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
1909 + - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
1812 1812  
1813 -----
1911 +---
1814 1814  
1815 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1816 -
1913 +## **Critique and Observations**
1817 1817  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1818 - - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1819 - - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
1915 + - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
1916 + - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
1820 1820  
1821 1821  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1822 - - Does not establish **causality** between economic decline and increased mortality.
1823 - - Lacks **granular data on opioid prescribing patterns and regional differences**.
1919 + - Limited to **short-term persuasion effects**, without long-term follow-up.
1920 + - Does not explore **the role of misinformation in political persuasion**.
1824 1824  
1825 1825  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1826 - - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1827 - - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1923 + - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
1924 + - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
1828 1828  
1829 -----
1926 +---
1830 1830  
1831 1831  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1832 -- Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1833 -- Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1834 -- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1929 +- Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
1930 +- Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
1931 +- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
1835 1835  
1836 -----
1933 +---
1837 1837  
1838 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1935 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1936 +1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
1937 +2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
1938 +3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
1839 1839  
1840 -1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1841 -2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1842 -3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1940 +---
1843 1843  
1844 -----
1845 -
1846 1846  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1847 -This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
1943 +This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.
1848 1848  
1849 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1945 +---
1850 1850  
1851 -----
1852 -
1853 1853  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1854 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
1948 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
1949 +
1855 1855  {{/expand}}
1856 1856  
1952 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1857 1857  
1858 -== Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities? ==
1954 +{{expand title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA" expanded="false"}}
1955 +**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
1956 +**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
1957 +**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
1958 +**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
1959 +**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
1960 +**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*
1859 1859  
1860 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1861 -**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1862 -**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1863 -**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1864 -**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1865 -**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1866 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1962 +---
1867 1867  
1868 -----
1869 -
1870 -## **Key Statistics**##
1871 -
1964 +## **Key Statistics**
1872 1872  1. **General Observations:**
1873 - - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1874 - - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
1966 + - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
1967 + - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
1875 1875  
1876 1876  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1877 - - Explores differences in **integration, social interactions, and perceptions of diversity**.
1878 - - Studies how **class, education, and neighborhood composition** affect adaptation to urban diversity.
1970 + - Examines **West Eurasian populations** and their genetic evolution.
1971 + - Tracks **changes in allele frequencies over millennia**.
1879 1879  
1880 1880  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1881 - - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1882 - - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1974 + - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
1975 + - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
1883 1883  
1884 -----
1977 +---
1885 1885  
1886 -## **Findings**##
1887 -
1979 +## **Findings**
1888 1888  1. **Primary Observations:**
1889 - - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1890 - - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
1981 + - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
1982 + - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
1891 1891  
1892 1892  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1893 - - Young, educated individuals in urban areas **are more open to cultural diversity**.
1894 - - Older and less mobile residents **report feelings of displacement and social isolation**.
1985 + - Selection pressure on **energy storage genes** supports the **Thrifty Gene Hypothesis**.
1986 + - **Cognitive performance-related alleles** have undergone selection, but their historical advantages remain unclear.
1895 1895  
1896 1896  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1897 - - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1898 - - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1989 + - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
1990 + - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
1991 + - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
1899 1899  
1900 -----
1993 +---
1901 1901  
1902 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1903 -
1995 +## **Critique and Observations**
1904 1904  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1905 - - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1906 - - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
1997 + - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
1998 + - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
1907 1907  
1908 1908  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1909 - - Limited to **Western European urban settings**, missing perspectives from other global regions.
1910 - - Does not fully explore **policy interventions for fostering social cohesion**.
2001 + - Findings **may not translate directly** to modern populations.
2002 + - **Unclear whether observed selection pressures persist today**.
1911 1911  
1912 1912  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1913 - - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1914 - - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
2005 + - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
2006 + - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
1915 1915  
1916 -----
2008 +---
1917 1917  
1918 1918  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1919 -- Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1920 -- Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1921 -- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
2011 +- Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
2012 +- Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
2013 +- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.
1922 1922  
1923 -----
2015 +---
1924 1924  
1925 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2017 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2018 +1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
2019 +2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
2020 +3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
1926 1926  
1927 -1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1928 -2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1929 -3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
2022 +---
1930 1930  
1931 -----
1932 -
1933 1933  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1934 -This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
2025 +This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.
1935 1935  
1936 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
2027 +---
1937 1937  
1938 -----
1939 -
1940 1940  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1941 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
2030 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]
2031 +
1942 1942  {{/expand}}
1943 1943  
2034 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1944 1944  
1945 -= Media =
2036 +{{expand title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" expanded="false"}}
2037 +**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
2038 +**Date of Publication:** *2012*
2039 +**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
2040 +**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
2041 +**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
2042 +**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*
1946 1946  
2044 +---
1947 1947  
1948 -== Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic ==
1949 -
1950 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"}}
1951 -**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1952 -**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1953 -**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1954 -**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1955 -**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1956 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1957 -
1958 -----
1959 -
1960 -## **Key Statistics**##
1961 -
2046 +## **Key Statistics**
1962 1962  1. **General Observations:**
1963 - - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1964 - - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
2048 + - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
2049 + - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
1965 1965  
1966 1966  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1967 - - **Anonymity and reduced social cues** in CMC increased hostility.
1968 - - **Echo chambers formed more frequently in algorithm-driven environments**.
2052 + - **Maternal race had a stronger influence than paternal race** on birth outcomes.
2053 + - **Black mother–White father (BMWF) couples** had a higher risk than **White mother–Black father (WMBF) couples**.
1969 1969  
1970 1970  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1971 - - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1972 - - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
2056 + - **Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for key outcomes:**
2057 + - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
2058 + - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
2059 + - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
1973 1973  
1974 -----
2061 +---
1975 1975  
1976 -## **Findings**##
1977 -
2063 +## **Findings**
1978 1978  1. **Primary Observations:**
1979 - - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1980 - - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
2065 + - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
2066 + - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
1981 1981  
1982 1982  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1983 - - Participants with **strong pre-existing biases became more polarized** after exposure to conflicting views.
1984 - - **Moderate users were more likely to disengage** from conflict-heavy discussions.
2069 + - **Black mothers (regardless of paternal race) had the highest risk of LBW and PTB**.
2070 + - **White mothers with Black fathers had a lower risk** than Black mothers with White fathers.
1985 1985  
1986 1986  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1987 - - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1988 - - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
2073 + - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
2074 + - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
1989 1989  
1990 -----
2076 +---
1991 1991  
1992 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1993 -
2078 +## **Critique and Observations**
1994 1994  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1995 - - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1996 - - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
2080 + - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
2081 + - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
1997 1997  
1998 1998  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1999 - - Lacks **qualitative analysis of user motivations**.
2000 - - Focuses on **Western social media platforms**, missing global perspectives.
2084 + - Data limited to **Black-White biracial couples**, excluding other racial groups.
2085 + - **Socioeconomic and healthcare access factors** not fully explored.
2001 2001  
2002 2002  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
2003 - - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
2004 - - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
2088 + - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
2089 + - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
2005 2005  
2006 -----
2091 +---
2007 2007  
2008 2008  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2009 -- Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
2010 -- Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
2011 -- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
2094 +- Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
2095 +- Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
2096 +- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.
2012 2012  
2013 -----
2098 +---
2014 2014  
2015 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2100 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2101 +1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
2102 +2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
2103 +3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
2016 2016  
2017 -1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
2018 -2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
2019 -3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
2105 +---
2020 2020  
2021 -----
2022 -
2023 2023  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2024 -This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
2108 +This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.
2025 2025  
2026 -----
2110 +---
2027 2027  
2028 2028  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2029 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
2113 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]
2114 +
2030 2030  {{/expand}}
2031 2031  
2117 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
2032 2032  
2033 -== Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions ==
2034 -
2035 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
2119 +{{expand title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions" expanded="false"}}
2036 2036  **Source:** *Politics & Policy*
2037 2037  **Date of Publication:** *2007*
2038 2038  **Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
2039 2039  **Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
2040 2040  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
2041 -**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
2125 +**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*
2042 2042  
2043 -----
2127 +---
2044 2044  
2045 -## **Key Statistics**##
2046 -
2129 +## **Key Statistics**
2047 2047  1. **General Observations:**
2048 2048   - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
2049 2049   - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
... ... @@ -2056,10 +2056,9 @@
2056 2056   - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
2057 2057   - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
2058 2058  
2059 -----
2142 +---
2060 2060  
2061 -## **Findings**##
2062 -
2144 +## **Findings**
2063 2063  1. **Primary Observations:**
2064 2064   - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
2065 2065   - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
... ... @@ -2072,10 +2072,9 @@
2072 2072   - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
2073 2073   - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
2074 2074  
2075 -----
2157 +---
2076 2076  
2077 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2078 -
2159 +## **Critique and Observations**
2079 2079  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2080 2080   - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
2081 2081   - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
... ... @@ -2088,113 +2088,31 @@
2088 2088   - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
2089 2089   - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
2090 2090  
2091 -----
2172 +---
2092 2092  
2093 2093  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2094 2094  - Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
2095 2095  - Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
2096 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
2177 +- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.
2097 2097  
2098 -----
2179 +---
2099 2099  
2100 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2101 -
2181 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2102 2102  1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
2103 2103  2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
2104 2104  3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
2105 2105  
2106 -----
2186 +---
2107 2107  
2108 2108  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2109 -This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
2189 +This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.
2110 2110  
2111 -----
2191 +---
2112 2112  
2113 2113  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2114 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
2194 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]
2195 +
2115 2115  {{/expand}}
2116 2116  
2198 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
2117 2117  
2118 -== Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion ==
2119 -
2120 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
2121 -**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
2122 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
2123 -**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
2124 -**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
2125 -**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2126 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
2127 -
2128 -----
2129 -
2130 -## **Key Statistics**##
2131 -
2132 -1. **General Observations:**
2133 - - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
2134 - - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
2135 -
2136 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
2137 - - **Video-based content was 2x more persuasive** than text-based content.
2138 - - Participants **under age 35 were more susceptible to political messaging shifts**.
2139 -
2140 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
2141 - - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
2142 - - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
2143 -
2144 -----
2145 -
2146 -## **Findings**##
2147 -
2148 -1. **Primary Observations:**
2149 - - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
2150 - - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
2151 -
2152 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
2153 - - **Social media platforms had stronger persuasive effects** than news websites.
2154 - - Participants who engaged in **online discussions retained more political knowledge**.
2155 -
2156 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
2157 - - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
2158 - - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
2159 -
2160 -----
2161 -
2162 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2163 -
2164 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2165 - - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
2166 - - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
2167 -
2168 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
2169 - - Limited to **short-term persuasion effects**, without long-term follow-up.
2170 - - Does not explore **the role of misinformation in political persuasion**.
2171 -
2172 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
2173 - - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
2174 - - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
2175 -
2176 -----
2177 -
2178 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
2179 -- Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
2180 -- Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
2181 -- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
2182 -
2183 -----
2184 -
2185 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2186 -
2187 -1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
2188 -2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
2189 -3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
2190 -
2191 -----
2192 -
2193 -## **Summary of Research Study**
2194 -This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
2195 -
2196 -----
2197 -
2198 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
2199 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
2200 -{{/expand}}