0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 84.2
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 07:13
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 74.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 05:23
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,627 +1,637 @@
1 1  = Research at a Glance =
2 2  
3 +== Introduction ==
3 3  
5 +Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various fields such as **social psychology, public policy, behavioral economics, and more**. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout.
4 4  
5 -Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various important Racial themes. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout. I wanted to make this for a couple of reasons. Number one is organization. There are a ton of useful studies out there that expose the truth, sometimes inadvertently. You'll notice that in this initial draft the summaries are often woke and reflect the bias of the AI writing them as well as the researchers politically correct conclusions in most cases. That's because I havent gotten to going through and pointing out the reasons I put all of them in here. There is often an underlying hypocrisy or double standar, saying the quiet part out loud, or conclusions that are so much of an antithesis to what the data shows that made me want to include it. At least, thats the idea for once its polished. I have about 150 more studies to upload, so it will be a few weeks before I get through it all. Until such time, feel free to search for them yourself and edit in what you find, or add your own studies. If you like you can do it manually, or if you'd rather go the route I did, just feed the study into an AI and tell them to summarize the study using the following format:
7 +=== How to Use This Repository ===
6 6  
7 -{{example}}
8 -~{~{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
9 -~*~*Source:~*~* [Journal/Institution Name]
10 -~*~*Date of Publication:~*~* [Publication Date]
11 -~*~*Author (s):~*~* [Author (s) Name (s)]
12 -~*~*Title:~*~* "[Study Title]"
13 -~*~*DOI:~*~* [DOI or Link]
14 -~*~*Subject Matter:~*~* [Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]
9 +- Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
10 +- Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
11 +- Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
12 +- If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
15 15  
16 -~-~--
14 +{{toc/}}
17 17  
18 -~#~# ~*~*Key Statistics~*~*
19 -~1. ~*~*General Observations:~*~*
16 +== Research Studies Repository ==
17 +
18 +
19 += Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding =
20 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
21 +**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
22 +**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
23 +**Author(s):** Smith et al.
24 +**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
25 +**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
26 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
27 +
28 +**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
29 +
30 +=== **Key Statistics** ===
31 +
32 +1. **General Observations:**
33 + - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
34 + - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
35 +
36 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
37 + - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
38 + - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
39 +
40 +=== **Findings** ===
41 +
42 +- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
43 +- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
44 +
45 +=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
46 +
47 +- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
48 +- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
49 +{{/expand}}
50 +
51 +{{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
52 +**Source:** [Journal/Institution Name]
53 +**Date of Publication:** [Publication Date]
54 +**Author(s):** [Author(s) Name(s)]
55 +**Title:** "[Study Title]"
56 +**DOI:** [DOI or Link]
57 +**Subject Matter:** [Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]
58 +
59 +---
60 +
61 +## **Key Statistics**
62 +1. **General Observations:**
20 20   - [Statistical finding or observation]
21 21   - [Statistical finding or observation]
22 22  
23 -2. ~*~*Subgroup Analysis:~*~*
66 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
24 24   - [Breakdown of findings by gender, race, or other subgroups]
25 25  
26 -3. ~*~*Other Significant Data Points:~*~*
69 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
27 27   - [Any additional findings or significant statistics]
28 28  
29 -~-~--
72 +---
30 30  
31 -~#~# ~*~*Findings~*~*
32 -~1. ~*~*Primary Observations:~*~*
74 +## **Findings**
75 +1. **Primary Observations:**
33 33   - [High-level findings or trends in the study]
34 34  
35 -2. ~*~*Subgroup Trends:~*~*
78 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
36 36   - [Disparities or differences highlighted in the study]
37 37  
38 -3. ~*~*Specific Case Analysis:~*~*
81 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
39 39   - [Detailed explanation of any notable specific findings]
40 40  
41 -~-~--
84 +---
42 42  
43 -~#~# ~*~*Critique and Observations~*~*
44 -~1. ~*~*Strengths of the Study:~*~*
86 +## **Critique and Observations**
87 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
45 45   - [Examples: strong methodology, large dataset, etc.]
46 46  
47 -2. ~*~*Limitations of the Study:~*~*
90 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
48 48   - [Examples: data gaps, lack of upstream analysis, etc.]
49 49  
50 -3. ~*~*Suggestions for Improvement:~*~*
93 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
51 51   - [Ideas for further research or addressing limitations]
52 52  
53 -~-~--
96 +---
54 54  
55 -~#~# ~*~*Relevance to Subproject~*~*
98 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
56 56  - [Explanation of how this study contributes to your subproject goals.]
57 57  - [Any key arguments or findings that support or challenge your views.]
58 58  
59 -~-~--
102 +---
60 60  
61 -~#~# ~*~*Suggestions for Further Exploration~*~*
62 -~1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
104 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
105 +1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
63 63  2. [Potential studies or sources to complement this analysis.]
64 64  
65 -~-~--
108 +---
66 66  
67 -~#~# ~*~*Summary of Research Study~*~*
68 -This study examines ~*~*[core research question or focus]~*~*, providing insights into ~*~*[main subject area]~*~*. The research utilized ~*~*[sample size and methodology]~*~* to assess ~*~*[key variables or measured outcomes]~*~*.
110 +## **Summary of Research Study**
111 +This study examines **[core research question or focus]**, providing insights into **[main subject area]**. The research utilized **[sample size and methodology]** to assess **[key variables or measured outcomes]**.
69 69  
70 -~{~{/expand}}
71 -
72 -{{/example}}
113 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
73 73  
74 -- Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
75 -- Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
76 -- Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
77 -- If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
78 -- You'll also find a download link to the original full study in pdf form at the bottom of the collapsible block.
115 +---
79 79  
117 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
118 +{{velocity}}
119 +#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
120 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
121 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
122 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
123 +#else
124 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
125 +#end
126 +{{/velocity}}
80 80  
81 -{{toc/}}
128 +{{/expand}}
82 82  
130 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
83 83  
84 84  
85 85  
134 +---
86 86  
87 -= Genetics =
136 +{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}}
137 +**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
138 +**Date of Publication:** *2020*
139 +**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
140 +**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
141 +**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
142 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*
88 88  
144 +---
89 89  
90 -== Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History ==
91 -
92 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
93 -**Source:** *Nature*
94 -**Date of Publication:** *2009*
95 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
96 -**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
97 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
98 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
99 -
100 -----
101 -
102 -## **Key Statistics**##
103 -
146 +## **Key Statistics**
104 104  1. **General Observations:**
105 - - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
106 - - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
148 + - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
149 + - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
107 107  
108 108  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
109 - - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
110 - - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
152 + - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
153 + - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
111 111  
112 112  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
113 - - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
114 - - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
156 + - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
157 + - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
115 115  
116 -----
159 +---
117 117  
118 -## **Findings**##
119 -
161 +## **Findings**
120 120  1. **Primary Observations:**
121 - - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
122 - - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
163 + - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
164 + - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
123 123  
124 124  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
125 - - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
126 - - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
167 + - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
168 + - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
127 127  
128 128  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
129 - - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
130 - - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
171 + - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
172 + - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
131 131  
132 -----
174 +---
133 133  
134 -## **Critique and Observations**##
135 -
176 +## **Critique and Observations**
136 136  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
137 - - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
138 - - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
178 + - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
179 + - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
139 139  
140 140  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
141 - - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
142 - - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
182 + - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
183 + - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
143 143  
144 144  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
145 - - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
146 - - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
186 + - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
187 + - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
147 147  
148 -----
189 +---
149 149  
150 150  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
151 -- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
152 -- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
153 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
192 +- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
193 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
154 154  
155 -----
195 +---
156 156  
157 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
197 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
198 +1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
199 +2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
158 158  
159 -1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
160 -2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
161 -3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
201 +---
162 162  
163 -----
164 -
165 165  ## **Summary of Research Study**
166 -This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
204 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.
167 167  
168 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studys contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
206 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
169 169  
170 -----
208 +---
171 171  
172 172  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
173 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
211 +{{velocity}}
212 +#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
213 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
214 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
215 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
216 +#else
217 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
218 +#end
219 +{{/velocity}}
220 +
174 174  {{/expand}}
175 175  
223 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
176 176  
177 -== Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations ==
178 178  
179 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
180 -**Source:** *Nature*
181 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
182 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
183 -**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
184 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
185 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
226 +{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}}
227 +**Source:** *Current Psychology*
228 +**Date of Publication:** *2024*
229 +**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
230 +**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
231 +**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
232 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
186 186  
187 -----
234 +---
188 188  
189 -## **Key Statistics**##
190 -
236 +## **Key Statistics**
191 191  1. **General Observations:**
192 - - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
193 - - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
238 + - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
239 + - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
194 194  
195 195  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
196 - - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
197 - - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
242 + - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
243 + - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
198 198  
199 199  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
200 - - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
201 - - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
246 + - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
247 + - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
202 202  
203 -----
249 +---
204 204  
205 -## **Findings**##
206 -
251 +## **Findings**
207 207  1. **Primary Observations:**
208 - - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
209 - - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
253 + - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
254 + - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
210 210  
211 211  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
212 - - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
213 - - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
257 + - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
258 + - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
214 214  
215 215  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
216 - - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
217 - - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
261 + - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
262 + - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
218 218  
219 -----
264 +---
220 220  
221 -## **Critique and Observations**##
222 -
266 +## **Critique and Observations**
223 223  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
224 - - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
225 - - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
268 + - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
269 + - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
226 226  
227 227  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
228 - - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
229 - - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
272 + - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
273 + - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
230 230  
231 231  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
232 - - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
233 - - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
276 + - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
277 + - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
234 234  
235 -----
279 +---
236 236  
237 237  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
238 -- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
239 -- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
240 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
282 +- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
283 +- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
284 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
241 241  
242 -----
286 +---
243 243  
244 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
288 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
289 +1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
290 +2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
291 +3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
245 245  
246 -1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
247 -2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
248 -3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
293 +---
249 249  
250 -----
251 -
252 252  ## **Summary of Research Study**
253 -This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
296 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.
254 254  
255 255  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
256 256  
257 -----
300 +---
258 258  
259 259  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
260 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
303 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
304 +
261 261  {{/expand}}
262 262  
307 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
263 263  
264 -== Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies ==
309 +{{expand title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" expanded="false"}} Source: Addictive Behaviors
310 +Date of Publication: 2016
311 +Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
312 +Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
313 +DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
314 +Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
265 265  
266 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
267 -**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
268 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
269 -**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
270 -**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
271 -**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
272 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
316 +Key Statistics
317 +General Observations:
273 273  
274 -----
319 +Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
320 +Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
321 +Subgroup Analysis:
275 275  
276 -## **Key Statistics**##
323 +Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
324 +Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
325 +Other Significant Data Points:
277 277  
278 -1. **General Observations:**
279 - - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
280 - - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
327 +Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
328 +Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
329 +Findings
330 +Primary Observations:
281 281  
282 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
283 - - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
284 - - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
332 +Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
333 +Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
334 +Subgroup Trends:
285 285  
286 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
287 - - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
288 - - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
336 +Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
337 +College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
338 +Specific Case Analysis:
289 289  
290 -----
340 +Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
341 +Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
342 +Critique and Observations
343 +Strengths of the Study:
291 291  
292 -## **Findings**##
345 +Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
346 +Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
347 +Limitations of the Study:
293 293  
294 -1. **Primary Observations:**
295 - - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
296 - - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
349 +Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
350 +Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
351 +Suggestions for Improvement:
297 297  
298 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
299 - - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (70-80%)**.
300 - - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
353 +Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
354 +Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
355 +Relevance to Subproject
356 +Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
357 +Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
358 +Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
359 +Suggestions for Further Exploration
360 +Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
361 +Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
362 +Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
363 +Summary of Research Study
364 +This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
301 301  
302 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
303 - - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
304 - - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
305 -
306 -----
307 -
308 -## **Critique and Observations**##
309 -
310 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
311 - - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
312 - - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
313 -
314 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
315 - - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
316 - - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
317 -
318 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
319 - - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
320 - - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
321 -
322 -----
323 -
324 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
325 -- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
326 -- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
327 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
328 -
329 -----
330 -
331 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
332 -
333 -1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
334 -2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
335 -3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
336 -
337 -----
338 -
339 -## **Summary of Research Study**
340 -This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
341 -
342 342  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
343 343  
344 -----
368 +📄 Download Full Study
369 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
345 345  
346 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
347 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
348 348  {{/expand}}
349 349  
373 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
350 350  
351 -== Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease ==
375 +{{expand title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?" expanded="false"}}
376 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
377 +**Date of Publication:** *2014*
378 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
379 +**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
380 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
381 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
352 352  
353 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
354 -**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
355 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
356 -**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
357 -**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
358 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
359 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
383 +---
360 360  
361 -----
362 -
363 -## **Key Statistics**##
364 -
385 +## **Key Statistics**
365 365  1. **General Observations:**
366 - - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
367 - - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
387 + - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
388 + - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
368 368  
369 369  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
370 - - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
371 - - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
391 + - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
392 + - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
372 372  
373 373  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
374 - - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
375 - - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
395 + - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
396 + - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
376 376  
377 -----
398 +---
378 378  
379 -## **Findings**##
380 -
400 +## **Findings**
381 381  1. **Primary Observations:**
382 - - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
383 - - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
402 + - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
403 + - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
384 384  
385 385  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
386 - - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
387 - - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
406 + - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
407 + - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
388 388  
389 389  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
390 - - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
391 - - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
410 + - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
411 + - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
392 392  
393 -----
413 +---
394 394  
395 -## **Critique and Observations**##
396 -
415 +## **Critique and Observations**
397 397  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
398 - - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
399 - - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
417 + - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
418 + - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
400 400  
401 401  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
402 - - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
403 - - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
421 + - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
422 + - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
404 404  
405 405  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
406 - - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
407 - - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
425 + - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
426 + - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
408 408  
409 -----
428 +---
410 410  
411 411  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
412 -- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
413 -- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
414 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
431 +- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
432 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
433 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
415 415  
416 -----
435 +---
417 417  
418 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
437 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
438 +1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
439 +2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
440 +3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
419 419  
420 -1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
421 -2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
422 -3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
442 +---
423 423  
424 -----
425 -
426 426  ## **Summary of Research Study**
427 -This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
445 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.
428 428  
429 429  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
430 430  
431 -----
449 +---
432 432  
433 433  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
434 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
452 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
453 +
435 435  {{/expand}}
436 436  
456 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
437 437  
438 -== Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA ==
458 +{{expand title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation" expanded="false"}}
459 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
460 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
461 +**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
462 +**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
463 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
464 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
439 439  
440 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
441 -**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
442 -**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
443 -**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
444 -**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
445 -**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
446 -**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
466 +---
447 447  
448 -----
449 -
450 -## **Key Statistics**##
451 -
468 +## **Key Statistics**
452 452  1. **General Observations:**
453 - - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
454 - - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
470 + - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
471 + - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
455 455  
456 456  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
457 - - Examines **West Eurasian populations** and their genetic evolution.
458 - - Tracks **changes in allele frequencies over millennia**.
474 + - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
475 + - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
459 459  
460 460  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
461 - - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
462 - - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
478 + - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
479 + - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
463 463  
464 -----
481 +---
465 465  
466 -## **Findings**##
467 -
483 +## **Findings**
468 468  1. **Primary Observations:**
469 - - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
470 - - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
485 + - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
486 + - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
471 471  
472 472  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
473 - - Selection pressure on **energy storage genes** supports the **Thrifty Gene Hypothesis**.
474 - - **Cognitive performance-related alleles** have undergone selection, but their historical advantages remain unclear.
489 + - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
490 + - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
475 475  
476 476  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
477 - - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
478 - - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
479 - - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
493 + - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
494 + - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
480 480  
481 -----
496 +---
482 482  
483 -## **Critique and Observations**##
484 -
498 +## **Critique and Observations**
485 485  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
486 - - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
487 - - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
500 + - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
501 + - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
488 488  
489 489  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
490 - - Findings **may not translate directly** to modern populations.
491 - - **Unclear whether observed selection pressures persist today**.
504 + - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
505 + - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
492 492  
493 493  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
494 - - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
495 - - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
508 + - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
509 + - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
496 496  
497 -----
511 +---
498 498  
499 499  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
500 -- Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
501 -- Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
502 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
514 +- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
515 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
516 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
503 503  
504 -----
518 +---
505 505  
506 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
520 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
521 +1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
522 +2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
523 +3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
507 507  
508 -1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
509 -2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
510 -3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
525 +---
511 511  
512 -----
513 -
514 514  ## **Summary of Research Study**
515 -This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
528 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.
516 516  
517 -----
530 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
518 518  
532 +---
533 +
519 519  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
520 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
535 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
536 +
521 521  {{/expand}}
522 522  
539 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
523 523  
524 -== Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age ==
541 +{{expand title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media" expanded="false"}}
542 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
543 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
544 +**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
545 +**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
546 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
547 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
525 525  
526 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
527 -**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
528 -**Date of Publication:** *2013*
529 -**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
530 -**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
531 -**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
532 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
549 +---
533 533  
534 -----
535 -
536 -## **Key Statistics**##
537 -
551 +## **Key Statistics**
538 538  1. **General Observations:**
539 - - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
540 - - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
553 + - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
554 + - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
541 541  
542 542  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
543 - - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
544 - - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
557 + - **90% of experts were from Western countries**, and **83% were male**.
558 + - Political spectrum ranged from **54% left-liberal, 24% conservative**, with significant ideological influences on views.
545 545  
546 546  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
547 - - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
548 - - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
561 + - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
562 + - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
549 549  
550 -----
564 +---
551 551  
552 -## **Findings**##
553 -
566 +## **Findings**
554 554  1. **Primary Observations:**
555 - - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
556 - - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
568 + - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
569 + - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
557 557  
558 558  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
559 - - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
560 - - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
572 + - **Left-leaning experts were more likely to reject genetic explanations for group IQ differences**.
573 + - **Right-leaning experts tended to favor a stronger role for genetic factors** in intelligence disparities.
561 561  
562 562  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
563 - - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
564 - - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
576 + - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
577 + - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
565 565  
566 -----
579 +---
567 567  
568 -## **Critique and Observations**##
569 -
581 +## **Critique and Observations**
570 570  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
571 - - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
572 - - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
583 + - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
584 + - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
573 573  
574 574  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
575 - - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
576 - - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
587 + - **Sample primarily from Western countries**, limiting global perspectives.
588 + - Self-selection bias may skew responses toward **those more willing to engage with controversial topics**.
577 577  
578 578  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
579 - - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
580 - - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
591 + - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
592 + - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
581 581  
582 -----
594 +---
583 583  
584 584  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
585 -- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
586 -- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
587 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
597 +- Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
598 +- Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
599 +- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
588 588  
589 -----
601 +---
590 590  
591 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
603 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
604 +1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
605 +2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
606 +3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
592 592  
593 -1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
594 -2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
595 -3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
608 +---
596 596  
597 -----
598 -
599 599  ## **Summary of Research Study**
600 -This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
611 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.
601 601  
602 602  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
603 603  
604 -----
615 +---
605 605  
606 606  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
607 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
618 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
619 +
608 608  {{/expand}}
609 609  
622 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
610 610  
611 -== Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications ==
612 -
613 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
624 +{{expand title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications" expanded="false"}}
614 614  **Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
615 615  **Date of Publication:** *2010*
616 616  **Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
617 617  **Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
618 618  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
619 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
630 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
620 620  
621 -----
632 +---
622 622  
623 -## **Key Statistics**##
624 -
634 +## **Key Statistics**
625 625  1. **General Observations:**
626 626   - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
627 627   - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
... ... @@ -634,10 +634,9 @@
634 634   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
635 635   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
636 636  
637 -----
647 +---
638 638  
639 -## **Findings**##
640 -
649 +## **Findings**
641 641  1. **Primary Observations:**
642 642   - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
643 643   - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
... ... @@ -650,10 +650,9 @@
650 650   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
651 651   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
652 652  
653 -----
662 +---
654 654  
655 -## **Critique and Observations**##
656 -
664 +## **Critique and Observations**
657 657  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
658 658   - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
659 659   - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
... ... @@ -666,1299 +666,1131 @@
666 666   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
667 667   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
668 668  
669 -----
677 +---
670 670  
671 671  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
672 672  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
673 673  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
674 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
682 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
675 675  
676 -----
684 +---
677 677  
678 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
679 -
686 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
680 680  1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
681 681  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
682 682  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
683 683  
684 -----
691 +---
685 685  
686 686  ## **Summary of Research Study**
687 -This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
694 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.
688 688  
689 689  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
690 690  
691 -----
698 +---
692 692  
693 693  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
694 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
701 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
702 +
695 695  {{/expand}}
696 696  
705 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
697 697  
698 -== Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media ==
707 +{{expand title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age" expanded="false"}}
708 +**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
709 +**Date of Publication:** *2013*
710 +**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
711 +**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
712 +**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
713 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
699 699  
700 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
701 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
702 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
703 -**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
704 -**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
705 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
706 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
715 +---
707 707  
708 -----
709 -
710 -## **Key Statistics**##
711 -
717 +## **Key Statistics**
712 712  1. **General Observations:**
713 - - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
714 - - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
719 + - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
720 + - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
715 715  
716 716  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
717 - - **90% of experts were from Western countries**, and **83% were male**.
718 - - Political spectrum ranged from **54% left-liberal, 24% conservative**, with significant ideological influences on views.
723 + - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
724 + - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
719 719  
720 720  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
721 - - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
722 - - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
727 + - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
728 + - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
723 723  
724 -----
730 +---
725 725  
726 -## **Findings**##
727 -
732 +## **Findings**
728 728  1. **Primary Observations:**
729 - - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
730 - - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
734 + - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
735 + - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
731 731  
732 732  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
733 - - **Left-leaning experts were more likely to reject genetic explanations for group IQ differences**.
734 - - **Right-leaning experts tended to favor a stronger role for genetic factors** in intelligence disparities.
738 + - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
739 + - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
735 735  
736 736  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
737 - - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
738 - - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
742 + - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
743 + - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
739 739  
740 -----
745 +---
741 741  
742 -## **Critique and Observations**##
743 -
747 +## **Critique and Observations**
744 744  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
745 - - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
746 - - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
749 + - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
750 + - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
747 747  
748 748  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
749 - - **Sample primarily from Western countries**, limiting global perspectives.
750 - - Self-selection bias may skew responses toward **those more willing to engage with controversial topics**.
753 + - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
754 + - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
751 751  
752 752  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
753 - - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
754 - - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
757 + - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
758 + - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
755 755  
756 -----
760 +---
757 757  
758 758  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
759 -- Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
760 -- Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
761 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
763 +- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
764 +- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
765 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
762 762  
763 -----
767 +---
764 764  
765 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
769 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
770 +1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
771 +2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
772 +3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
766 766  
767 -1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
768 -2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
769 -3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
774 +---
770 770  
771 -----
772 -
773 773  ## **Summary of Research Study**
774 -This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
777 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.
775 775  
776 776  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
777 777  
778 -----
781 +---
779 779  
780 780  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
781 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
784 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
785 +
782 782  {{/expand}}
783 783  
788 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
784 784  
785 -== Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation ==
790 +{{expand title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports" expanded="false"}}
791 +**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
792 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
793 +**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
794 +**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
795 +**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
796 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
786 786  
787 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
788 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
789 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
790 -**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
791 -**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
792 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
793 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
798 +---
794 794  
795 -----
796 -
797 -## **Key Statistics**##
798 -
800 +## **Key Statistics**
799 799  1. **General Observations:**
800 - - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
801 - - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
802 + - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
803 + - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
802 802  
803 803  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
804 - - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
805 - - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
806 + - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
807 + - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
806 806  
807 807  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
808 - - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
809 - - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
810 + - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
811 + - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
810 810  
811 -----
813 +---
812 812  
813 -## **Findings**##
814 -
815 +## **Findings**
815 815  1. **Primary Observations:**
816 - - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
817 - - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
817 + - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
818 + - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
818 818  
819 819  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
820 - - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
821 - - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
821 + - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
822 + - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
822 822  
823 823  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
824 - - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
825 - - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
825 + - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
826 + - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
826 826  
827 -----
828 +---
828 828  
829 -## **Critique and Observations**##
830 -
830 +## **Critique and Observations**
831 831  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
832 - - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
833 - - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
832 + - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
833 + - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
834 834  
835 835  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
836 - - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
837 - - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
836 + - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
837 + - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
838 838  
839 839  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
840 - - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
841 - - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
840 + - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
841 + - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
842 842  
843 -----
843 +---
844 844  
845 845  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
846 -- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
847 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
848 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
846 +- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
847 +- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
848 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
849 849  
850 -----
850 +---
851 851  
852 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
852 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
853 +1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
854 +2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
855 +3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
853 853  
854 -1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
855 -2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
856 -3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
857 +---
857 857  
858 -----
859 -
860 860  ## **Summary of Research Study**
861 -This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.  ##
860 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.
862 862  
863 863  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
864 864  
865 -----
864 +---
866 866  
867 867  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
868 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
869 -{{/expand}}
867 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
870 870  
871 -
872 -== Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding ==
873 -
874 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
875 -**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
876 -**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
877 -**Author(s):** Smith et al.
878 -**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
879 -**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
880 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science 
881 -
882 -**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
883 -
884 - **Key Statistics**
885 -
886 -1. **General Observations:**
887 - - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
888 - - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
889 -
890 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
891 - - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
892 - - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
893 -
894 - **Findings**
895 -
896 -- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
897 -- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
898 -
899 - **Relevance to Subproject**
900 -
901 -- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
902 -- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
903 903  {{/expand}}
904 904  
871 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
905 905  
906 -----
873 +{{expand title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History" expanded="false"}}
874 +**Source:** *Nature*
875 +**Date of Publication:** *2009*
876 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
877 +**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
878 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
879 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*
907 907  
908 -= Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
881 +---
909 909  
910 -
911 -== Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018 ==
912 -
913 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
914 -**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
915 -**Date of Publication:** *2020*
916 -**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
917 -**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
918 -**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
919 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
920 -
921 -----
922 -
923 -## **Key Statistics**##
924 -
883 +## **Key Statistics**
925 925  1. **General Observations:**
926 - - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
927 - - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
885 + - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
886 + - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
928 928  
929 929  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
930 - - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
931 - - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
889 + - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
890 + - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
932 932  
933 933  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
934 - - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
935 - - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
893 + - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
894 + - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
936 936  
937 -----
896 +---
938 938  
939 -## **Findings**##
940 -
898 +## **Findings**
941 941  1. **Primary Observations:**
942 - - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
943 - - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
900 + - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
901 + - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
944 944  
945 945  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
946 - - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
947 - - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
904 + - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
905 + - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
948 948  
949 949  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
950 - - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
951 - - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
908 + - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
909 + - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
952 952  
953 -----
911 +---
954 954  
955 -## **Critique and Observations**##
956 -
913 +## **Critique and Observations**
957 957  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
958 - - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
959 - - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
915 + - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
916 + - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
960 960  
961 961  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
962 - - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
963 - - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
919 + - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
920 + - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
964 964  
965 965  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
966 - - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
967 - - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
923 + - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
924 + - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
968 968  
969 -----
926 +---
970 970  
971 971  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
972 -- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
973 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
929 +- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
930 +- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
931 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
974 974  
975 -----
933 +---
976 976  
977 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
935 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
936 +1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
937 +2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
938 +3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
978 978  
979 -1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
980 -2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
940 +---
981 981  
982 -----
983 -
984 984  ## **Summary of Research Study**
985 -This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.  ##
943 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.
986 986  
987 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
945 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studys contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
988 988  
989 -----
947 +---
990 990  
991 991  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
992 -{{velocity}}
993 -#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
994 -#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
995 -#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
996 -[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
997 -#else
998 -{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
999 -#end {{/velocity}}##
950 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
951 +
1000 1000  {{/expand}}
1001 1001  
954 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1002 1002  
1003 -== Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ==
1004 1004  
1005 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
1006 -**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
1007 -**Date of Publication:** *2012*
1008 -**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
1009 -**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
1010 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
1011 -**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
957 +{{expand title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations" expanded="false"}}
958 +**Source:** *Nature*
959 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
960 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
961 +**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
962 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
963 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
1012 1012  
1013 -----
965 +---
1014 1014  
1015 -## **Key Statistics**##
1016 -
967 +## **Key Statistics**
1017 1017  1. **General Observations:**
1018 - - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
1019 - - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
969 + - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
970 + - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
1020 1020  
1021 1021  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1022 - - **Maternal race had a stronger influence than paternal race** on birth outcomes.
1023 - - **Black mother–White father (BMWF) couples** had a higher risk than **White mother–Black father (WMBF) couples**.
973 + - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
974 + - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
1024 1024  
1025 1025  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1026 - - **Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for key outcomes:**
1027 - - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
1028 - - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
1029 - - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
977 + - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
978 + - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
1030 1030  
1031 -----
980 +---
1032 1032  
1033 -## **Findings**##
1034 -
982 +## **Findings**
1035 1035  1. **Primary Observations:**
1036 - - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
1037 - - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
984 + - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
985 + - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
1038 1038  
1039 1039  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1040 - - **Black mothers (regardless of paternal race) had the highest risk of LBW and PTB**.
1041 - - **White mothers with Black fathers had a lower risk** than Black mothers with White fathers.
988 + - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
989 + - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
1042 1042  
1043 1043  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1044 - - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
1045 - - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
992 + - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
993 + - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
1046 1046  
1047 -----
995 +---
1048 1048  
1049 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1050 -
997 +## **Critique and Observations**
1051 1051  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1052 - - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
1053 - - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
999 + - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
1000 + - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
1054 1054  
1055 1055  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1056 - - Data limited to **Black-White biracial couples**, excluding other racial groups.
1057 - - **Socioeconomic and healthcare access factors** not fully explored.
1003 + - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
1004 + - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
1058 1058  
1059 1059  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1060 - - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
1061 - - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
1007 + - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
1008 + - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
1062 1062  
1063 -----
1010 +---
1064 1064  
1065 1065  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1066 -- Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
1067 -- Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
1068 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
1013 +- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
1014 +- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
1015 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
1069 1069  
1070 -----
1017 +---
1071 1071  
1072 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1019 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1020 +1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
1021 +2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
1022 +3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
1073 1073  
1074 -1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
1075 -2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
1076 -3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
1024 +---
1077 1077  
1078 -----
1079 -
1080 1080  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1081 -This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
1027 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.
1082 1082  
1083 -----
1029 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1084 1084  
1031 +---
1032 +
1085 1085  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1086 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
1034 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
1035 +
1087 1087  {{/expand}}
1088 1088  
1038 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1089 1089  
1090 -== Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness ==
1040 +{{expand title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies" expanded="false"}}
1041 +**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
1042 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1043 +**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
1044 +**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
1045 +**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
1046 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
1091 1091  
1092 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
1093 -**Source:** *Current Psychology*
1094 -**Date of Publication:** *2024*
1095 -**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
1096 -**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
1097 -**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
1098 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
1048 +---
1099 1099  
1100 -----
1101 -
1102 -## **Key Statistics**##
1103 -
1050 +## **Key Statistics**
1104 1104  1. **General Observations:**
1105 - - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
1106 - - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
1052 + - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
1053 + - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
1107 1107  
1108 1108  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1109 - - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
1110 - - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
1056 + - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
1057 + - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
1111 1111  
1112 1112  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1113 - - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
1114 - - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
1060 + - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
1061 + - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
1115 1115  
1116 -----
1063 +---
1117 1117  
1118 -## **Findings**##
1119 -
1065 +## **Findings**
1120 1120  1. **Primary Observations:**
1121 - - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
1122 - - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
1067 + - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
1068 + - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
1123 1123  
1124 1124  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1125 - - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
1126 - - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
1071 + - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (~70-80%)**.
1072 + - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
1127 1127  
1128 1128  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1129 - - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
1130 - - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
1075 + - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
1076 + - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
1131 1131  
1132 -----
1078 +---
1133 1133  
1134 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1135 -
1080 +## **Critique and Observations**
1136 1136  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1137 - - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
1138 - - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
1082 + - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
1083 + - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
1139 1139  
1140 1140  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1141 - - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
1142 - - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
1086 + - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
1087 + - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
1143 1143  
1144 1144  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1145 - - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
1146 - - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
1090 + - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
1091 + - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
1147 1147  
1148 -----
1093 +---
1149 1149  
1150 1150  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1151 -- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
1152 -- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
1153 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
1096 +- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
1097 +- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
1098 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
1154 1154  
1155 -----
1100 +---
1156 1156  
1157 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1102 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1103 +1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
1104 +2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
1105 +3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
1158 1158  
1159 -1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
1160 -2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
1161 -3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
1107 +---
1162 1162  
1163 -----
1164 -
1165 1165  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1166 -This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
1110 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.
1167 1167  
1168 1168  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1169 1169  
1170 -----
1114 +---
1171 1171  
1172 1172  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1173 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
1117 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
1118 +
1174 1174  {{/expand}}
1175 1175  
1121 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1176 1176  
1177 -= Crime and Substance Abuse =
1178 -
1179 -
1180 -== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1181 -
1182 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1183 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1123 +{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}}
1124 +**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
1184 1184  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
1185 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1186 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1187 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1188 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1126 +**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
1127 +**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
1128 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
1129 +**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*
1189 1189  
1190 -----
1131 +---
1191 1191  
1192 -## **Key Statistics**##
1193 -
1133 +## **Key Statistics**
1194 1194  1. **General Observations:**
1195 - - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1196 - - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1135 + - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
1136 + - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
1197 1197  
1198 1198  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1199 - - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1200 - - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1139 + - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
1140 + - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
1201 1201  
1202 1202  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1203 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1204 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1143 + - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
1144 + - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
1205 1205  
1206 -----
1146 +---
1207 1207  
1208 -## **Findings**##
1209 -
1148 +## **Findings**
1210 1210  1. **Primary Observations:**
1211 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1212 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1150 + - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
1151 + - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
1213 1213  
1214 1214  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1215 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1216 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1154 + - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
1155 + - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
1217 1217  
1218 1218  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1219 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1220 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1158 + - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
1159 + - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
1221 1221  
1222 -----
1161 +---
1223 1223  
1224 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1225 -
1163 +## **Critique and Observations**
1226 1226  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1227 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1228 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1165 + - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
1166 + - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
1229 1229  
1230 1230  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1231 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1232 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1169 + - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
1170 + - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
1233 1233  
1234 1234  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1235 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1236 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1173 + - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
1174 + - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
1237 1237  
1238 -----
1176 +---
1239 1239  
1240 1240  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1241 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1242 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1243 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1179 +- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
1180 +- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
1181 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
1244 1244  
1245 -----
1183 +---
1246 1246  
1247 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1185 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1186 +1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
1187 +2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
1188 +3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
1248 1248  
1249 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1250 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1251 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1190 +---
1252 1252  
1253 -----
1254 -
1255 1255  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1256 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1193 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.
1257 1257  
1258 1258  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1259 1259  
1260 -----
1197 +---
1261 1261  
1262 1262  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1263 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1200 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
1201 +
1264 1264  {{/expand}}
1265 1265  
1204 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1266 1266  
1267 -== Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1268 1268  
1269 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1270 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1271 -**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1272 -**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1273 -**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1274 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1275 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1276 1276  
1277 -----
1208 +{{expand title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations" expanded="false"}}
1209 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1210 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1211 +**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1212 +**Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1213 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1214 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1278 1278  
1279 -## **Key Statistics**##
1216 +---
1280 1280  
1218 +## **Key Statistics**
1281 1281  1. **General Observations:**
1282 - - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1283 - - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1220 + - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1221 + - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
1284 1284  
1285 1285  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1286 - - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1287 - - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1224 + - **50% of medical students surveyed endorsed at least one false belief about biological differences**.
1225 + - Participants who held these false beliefs were **more likely to underestimate Black patients pain levels**.
1288 1288  
1289 1289  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1290 - - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1291 - - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1228 + - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1229 + - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1292 1292  
1293 -----
1231 +---
1294 1294  
1295 -## **Findings**##
1296 -
1233 +## **Findings**
1297 1297  1. **Primary Observations:**
1298 - - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1299 - - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1235 + - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1236 + - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
1300 1300  
1301 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1302 - - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1303 - - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1238 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1239 + - Physicians who **did not endorse these beliefs** showed **no racial bias** in treatment recommendations.
1240 + - Bias was **strongest among first-year medical students** and decreased slightly in later years of training.
1304 1304  
1305 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1306 - - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1307 - - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1242 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1243 + - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1244 + - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1308 1308  
1309 -----
1246 +---
1310 1310  
1311 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1248 +## **Critique and Observations**
1249 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1250 + - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1251 + - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
1312 1312  
1313 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1314 - - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1315 - - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1253 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1254 + - The study focuses on **Black vs. white disparities**, leaving other racial/ethnic groups unexplored.
1255 + - Participants' responses were based on **hypothetical medical cases, not real-world treatment decisions**.
1316 1316  
1317 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1318 - - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1319 - - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1257 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1258 + - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1259 + - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1320 1320  
1321 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1322 - - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1323 - - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1261 +---
1324 1324  
1325 -----
1326 -
1327 1327  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1328 -- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1329 -- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1330 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1264 +- Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1265 +- Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1266 +- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1331 1331  
1332 -----
1268 +---
1333 1333  
1334 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1270 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1271 +1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1272 +2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1273 +3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1335 1335  
1336 -1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1337 -2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1338 -3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1275 +---
1339 1339  
1340 -----
1341 -
1342 1342  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1343 -This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
1278 +This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.
1344 1344  
1345 1345  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1346 1346  
1347 -----
1282 +---
1348 1348  
1349 1349  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1350 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
1285 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1286 +
1351 1351  {{/expand}}
1352 1352  
1289 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1353 1353  
1354 -== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1355 1355  
1356 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1357 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1358 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1359 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1360 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1361 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1362 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1292 +{{expand title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans" expanded="false"}}
1293 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1294 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1295 +**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1296 +**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1297 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1298 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1363 1363  
1364 -----
1300 +---
1365 1365  
1366 -## **Key Statistics**##
1367 -
1302 +## **Key Statistics**
1368 1368  1. **General Observations:**
1369 - - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1370 - - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1304 + - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1305 + - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
1371 1371  
1372 1372  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1373 - - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1374 - - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1308 + - The increase was **most pronounced among those with a high school education or less**.
1309 + - Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic mortality continued to decline over the same period.
1375 1375  
1376 1376  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1377 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1378 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1312 + - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1313 + - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1379 1379  
1380 -----
1315 +---
1381 1381  
1382 -## **Findings**##
1383 -
1317 +## **Findings**
1384 1384  1. **Primary Observations:**
1385 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1386 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1319 + - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1320 + - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
1387 1387  
1388 1388  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1389 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1390 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1323 + - The **largest mortality increases** occurred among **whites without a college degree**.
1324 + - Chronic pain, functional limitations, and self-reported mental distress **rose significantly in affected groups**.
1391 1391  
1392 1392  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1393 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1394 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1327 + - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1328 + - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1395 1395  
1396 -----
1330 +---
1397 1397  
1398 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1399 -
1332 +## **Critique and Observations**
1400 1400  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1401 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1402 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1334 + - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1335 + - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
1403 1403  
1404 1404  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1405 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1406 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1338 + - Does not establish **causality** between economic decline and increased mortality.
1339 + - Lacks **granular data on opioid prescribing patterns and regional differences**.
1407 1407  
1408 1408  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1409 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1410 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1342 + - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1343 + - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1411 1411  
1412 -----
1345 +---
1413 1413  
1414 1414  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1415 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1416 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1417 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1348 +- Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1349 +- Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1350 +- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1418 1418  
1419 -----
1352 +---
1420 1420  
1421 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1354 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1355 +1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1356 +2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1357 +3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1422 1422  
1423 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1424 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1425 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1359 +---
1426 1426  
1427 -----
1428 -
1429 1429  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1430 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1362 +This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.
1431 1431  
1432 1432  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1433 1433  
1434 -----
1366 +---
1435 1435  
1436 1436  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1437 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1438 -{{/expand}}
1369 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1439 1439  
1440 -
1441 -== Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults ==
1442 -
1443 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1444 - Source: Addictive Behaviors
1445 -Date of Publication: 2016
1446 -Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
1447 -Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
1448 -DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
1449 -Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
1450 -
1451 -Key Statistics
1452 -General Observations:
1453 -
1454 -Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
1455 -Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
1456 -Subgroup Analysis:
1457 -
1458 -Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
1459 -Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
1460 -Other Significant Data Points:
1461 -
1462 -Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
1463 -Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
1464 -Findings
1465 -Primary Observations:
1466 -
1467 -Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
1468 -Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
1469 -Subgroup Trends:
1470 -
1471 -Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
1472 -College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
1473 -Specific Case Analysis:
1474 -
1475 -Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
1476 -Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
1477 -Critique and Observations
1478 -Strengths of the Study:
1479 -
1480 -Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
1481 -Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
1482 -Limitations of the Study:
1483 -
1484 -Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
1485 -Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
1486 -Suggestions for Improvement:
1487 -
1488 -Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
1489 -Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
1490 -Relevance to Subproject
1491 -Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
1492 -Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
1493 -Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
1494 -Suggestions for Further Exploration
1495 -Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
1496 -Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
1497 -Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
1498 -Summary of Research Study
1499 -This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
1500 -
1501 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1502 -
1503 -📄 Download Full Study
1504 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
1505 1505  {{/expand}}
1506 1506  
1373 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1507 1507  
1508 -== Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time? ==
1375 +{{expand title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?" expanded="false"}}
1376 +**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1377 +**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1378 +**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1379 +**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1380 +**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1381 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1509 1509  
1510 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1511 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1512 -**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1513 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1514 -**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1515 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1516 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1383 +---
1517 1517  
1518 -----
1519 -
1520 -## **Key Statistics**##
1521 -
1385 +## **Key Statistics**
1522 1522  1. **General Observations:**
1523 - - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1524 - - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
1387 + - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1388 + - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
1525 1525  
1526 1526  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1527 - - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
1528 - - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
1391 + - Explores differences in **integration, social interactions, and perceptions of diversity**.
1392 + - Studies how **class, education, and neighborhood composition** affect adaptation to urban diversity.
1529 1529  
1530 1530  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1531 - - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1532 - - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1395 + - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1396 + - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1533 1533  
1534 -----
1398 +---
1535 1535  
1536 -## **Findings**##
1537 -
1400 +## **Findings**
1538 1538  1. **Primary Observations:**
1539 - - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1540 - - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
1402 + - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1403 + - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
1541 1541  
1542 1542  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1543 - - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
1544 - - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
1406 + - Young, educated individuals in urban areas **are more open to cultural diversity**.
1407 + - Older and less mobile residents **report feelings of displacement and social isolation**.
1545 1545  
1546 1546  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1547 - - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1548 - - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1410 + - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1411 + - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1549 1549  
1550 -----
1413 +---
1551 1551  
1552 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1553 -
1415 +## **Critique and Observations**
1554 1554  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1555 - - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1556 - - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
1417 + - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1418 + - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
1557 1557  
1558 1558  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1559 - - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
1560 - - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
1421 + - Limited to **Western European urban settings**, missing perspectives from other global regions.
1422 + - Does not fully explore **policy interventions for fostering social cohesion**.
1561 1561  
1562 1562  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1563 - - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1564 - - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1425 + - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1426 + - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1565 1565  
1566 -----
1428 +---
1567 1567  
1568 1568  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1569 -- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1570 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1571 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1431 +- Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1432 +- Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1433 +- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1572 1572  
1573 -----
1435 +---
1574 1574  
1575 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1437 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1438 +1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1439 +2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1440 +3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1576 1576  
1577 -1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1578 -2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1579 -3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1442 +---
1580 1580  
1581 -----
1582 -
1583 1583  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1584 -This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.  ##
1445 +This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.
1585 1585  
1586 1586  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1587 1587  
1588 -----
1449 +---
1589 1589  
1590 1590  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1591 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
1452 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1453 +
1592 1592  {{/expand}}
1593 1593  
1456 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1594 1594  
1595 -= Whiteness & White Guilt =
1458 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1459 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1460 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1461 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1462 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1463 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1464 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1596 1596  
1597 -== Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports ==
1466 +---
1598 1598  
1599 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1600 -**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1601 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1602 -**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1603 -**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1604 -**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1605 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1606 -
1607 -----
1608 -
1609 -## **Key Statistics**##
1610 -
1468 +## **Key Statistics**
1611 1611  1. **General Observations:**
1612 - - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1613 - - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
1470 + - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1471 + - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1614 1614  
1615 1615  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1616 - - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
1617 - - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
1474 + - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1475 + - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1618 1618  
1619 1619  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1620 - - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1621 - - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1478 + - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1479 + - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1622 1622  
1623 -----
1481 +---
1624 1624  
1625 -## **Findings**##
1626 -
1483 +## **Findings**
1627 1627  1. **Primary Observations:**
1628 - - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1629 - - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
1485 + - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1486 + - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1630 1630  
1631 1631  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1632 - - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
1633 - - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
1489 + - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1490 + - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1634 1634  
1635 1635  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1636 - - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1637 - - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1493 + - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1494 + - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1638 1638  
1639 -----
1496 +---
1640 1640  
1641 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1642 -
1498 +## **Critique and Observations**
1643 1643  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1644 - - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1645 - - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
1500 + - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1501 + - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1646 1646  
1647 1647  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1648 - - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
1649 - - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
1504 + - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1505 + - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1650 1650  
1651 1651  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1652 - - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1653 - - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1508 + - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1509 + - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1654 1654  
1655 -----
1511 +---
1656 1656  
1657 1657  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1658 -- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1659 -- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1660 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1514 +- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1515 +- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1516 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1661 1661  
1662 -----
1518 +---
1663 1663  
1664 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1520 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1521 +1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1522 +2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1523 +3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1665 1665  
1666 -1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1667 -2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1668 -3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1525 +---
1669 1669  
1670 -----
1671 -
1672 1672  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1673 -This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
1528 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1674 1674  
1675 1675  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1676 1676  
1677 -----
1532 +---
1678 1678  
1679 1679  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1680 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
1535 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1536 +
1681 1681  {{/expand}}
1682 1682  
1539 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1683 1683  
1684 -== Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations ==
1685 1685  
1686 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1687 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1688 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1689 -**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1690 -**Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1691 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1692 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1542 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1543 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1544 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1545 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1546 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1547 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1548 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1693 1693  
1694 -----
1550 +---
1695 1695  
1696 -## **Key Statistics**##
1697 -
1552 +## **Key Statistics**
1698 1698  1. **General Observations:**
1699 - - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1700 - - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
1554 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1555 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1701 1701  
1702 1702  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1703 - - **50% of medical students surveyed endorsed at least one false belief about biological differences**.
1704 - - Participants who held these false beliefs were **more likely to underestimate Black patients pain levels**.
1558 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1559 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1705 1705  
1706 1706  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1707 - - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1708 - - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1562 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1563 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1709 1709  
1710 -----
1565 +---
1711 1711  
1712 -## **Findings**##
1713 -
1567 +## **Findings**
1714 1714  1. **Primary Observations:**
1715 - - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1716 - - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
1569 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1570 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1717 1717  
1718 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1719 - - Physicians who **did not endorse these beliefs** showed **no racial bias** in treatment recommendations.
1720 - - Bias was **strongest among first-year medical students** and decreased slightly in later years of training.
1572 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1573 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1574 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1721 1721  
1722 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1723 - - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1724 - - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1576 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1577 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1578 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1725 1725  
1726 -----
1580 +---
1727 1727  
1728 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1582 +## **Critique and Observations**
1583 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1584 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1585 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1729 1729  
1730 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1731 - - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1732 - - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
1587 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1588 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1589 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1733 1733  
1734 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1735 - - The study focuses on **Black vs. white disparities**, leaving other racial/ethnic groups unexplored.
1736 - - Participants' responses were based on **hypothetical medical cases, not real-world treatment decisions**.
1591 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1592 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1593 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1737 1737  
1738 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1739 - - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1740 - - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1595 +---
1741 1741  
1742 -----
1743 -
1744 1744  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1745 -- Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1746 -- Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1747 -- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1598 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1599 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1600 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1748 1748  
1749 -----
1602 +---
1750 1750  
1751 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1604 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1605 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1606 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1607 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1752 1752  
1753 -1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1754 -2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1755 -3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1609 +---
1756 1756  
1757 -----
1758 -
1759 1759  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1760 -This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
1612 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1761 1761  
1762 1762  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1763 1763  
1764 -----
1616 +---
1765 1765  
1766 1766  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1767 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
1619 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1620 +
1768 1768  {{/expand}}
1769 1769  
1623 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1770 1770  
1771 -== Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans ==
1625 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1626 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1627 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1628 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1629 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1630 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1631 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1772 1772  
1773 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1774 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1775 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1776 -**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1777 -**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1778 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1779 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1633 +---
1780 1780  
1781 -----
1782 -
1783 -## **Key Statistics**##
1784 -
1635 +## **Key Statistics**
1785 1785  1. **General Observations:**
1786 - - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1787 - - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
1637 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1638 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1788 1788  
1789 1789  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1790 - - The increase was **most pronounced among those with a high school education or less**.
1791 - - Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic mortality continued to decline over the same period.
1641 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1642 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1792 1792  
1793 1793  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1794 - - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1795 - - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1645 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1646 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1796 1796  
1797 -----
1648 +---
1798 1798  
1799 -## **Findings**##
1800 -
1650 +## **Findings**
1801 1801  1. **Primary Observations:**
1802 - - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1803 - - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
1652 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1653 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1804 1804  
1805 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1806 - - The **largest mortality increases** occurred among **whites without a college degree**.
1807 - - Chronic pain, functional limitations, and self-reported mental distress **rose significantly in affected groups**.
1655 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1656 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1657 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1808 1808  
1809 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1810 - - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1811 - - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1659 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1660 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1661 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1812 1812  
1813 -----
1663 +---
1814 1814  
1815 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1665 +## **Critique and Observations**
1666 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1667 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1668 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1816 1816  
1817 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1818 - - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1819 - - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
1670 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1671 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1672 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1820 1820  
1821 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1822 - - Does not establish **causality** between economic decline and increased mortality.
1823 - - Lacks **granular data on opioid prescribing patterns and regional differences**.
1674 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1675 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1676 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1824 1824  
1825 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1826 - - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1827 - - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1678 +---
1828 1828  
1829 -----
1830 -
1831 1831  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1832 -- Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1833 -- Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1834 -- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1681 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1682 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1683 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1835 1835  
1836 -----
1685 +---
1837 1837  
1838 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1687 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1688 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1689 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1690 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1839 1839  
1840 -1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1841 -2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1842 -3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1692 +---
1843 1843  
1844 -----
1845 -
1846 1846  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1847 -This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
1695 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1848 1848  
1849 1849  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1850 1850  
1851 -----
1699 +---
1852 1852  
1853 1853  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1854 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
1702 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1703 +
1855 1855  {{/expand}}
1856 1856  
1706 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1857 1857  
1858 -== Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities? ==
1708 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1709 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1710 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1711 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1712 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1713 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1714 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1859 1859  
1860 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1861 -**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1862 -**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1863 -**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1864 -**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1865 -**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1866 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1716 +---
1867 1867  
1868 -----
1869 -
1870 -## **Key Statistics**##
1871 -
1718 +## **Key Statistics**
1872 1872  1. **General Observations:**
1873 - - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1874 - - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
1720 + - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1721 + - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1875 1875  
1876 1876  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1877 - - Explores differences in **integration, social interactions, and perceptions of diversity**.
1878 - - Studies how **class, education, and neighborhood composition** affect adaptation to urban diversity.
1724 + - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1725 + - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1879 1879  
1880 1880  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1881 - - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1882 - - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1728 + - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1729 + - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1883 1883  
1884 -----
1731 +---
1885 1885  
1886 -## **Findings**##
1887 -
1733 +## **Findings**
1888 1888  1. **Primary Observations:**
1889 - - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1890 - - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
1735 + - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1736 + - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1891 1891  
1892 1892  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1893 - - Young, educated individuals in urban areas **are more open to cultural diversity**.
1894 - - Older and less mobile residents **report feelings of displacement and social isolation**.
1739 + - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1740 + - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1895 1895  
1896 1896  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1897 - - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1898 - - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1743 + - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1744 + - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1899 1899  
1900 -----
1746 +---
1901 1901  
1902 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1903 -
1748 +## **Critique and Observations**
1904 1904  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1905 - - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1906 - - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
1750 + - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1751 + - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1907 1907  
1908 1908  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1909 - - Limited to **Western European urban settings**, missing perspectives from other global regions.
1910 - - Does not fully explore **policy interventions for fostering social cohesion**.
1754 + - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1755 + - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1911 1911  
1912 1912  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1913 - - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1914 - - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1758 + - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1759 + - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1915 1915  
1916 -----
1761 +---
1917 1917  
1918 1918  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1919 -- Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1920 -- Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1921 -- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
1764 +- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1765 +- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1766 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1922 1922  
1923 -----
1768 +---
1924 1924  
1925 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1770 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1771 +1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1772 +2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1773 +3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1926 1926  
1927 -1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1928 -2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1929 -3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1775 +---
1930 1930  
1931 -----
1932 -
1933 1933  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1934 -This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
1778 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1935 1935  
1936 1936  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1937 1937  
1938 -----
1782 +---
1939 1939  
1940 1940  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1941 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
1785 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1786 +
1942 1942  {{/expand}}
1943 1943  
1789 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1944 1944  
1945 -= Media =
1946 -
1947 -
1948 -== Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic ==
1949 -
1950 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"}}
1791 +{{expand title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict" expanded="false"}}
1951 1951  **Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1952 1952  **Date of Publication:** *2021*
1953 1953  **Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1954 1954  **Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1955 1955  **DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1956 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1797 +**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*
1957 1957  
1958 -----
1799 +---
1959 1959  
1960 -## **Key Statistics**##
1961 -
1801 +## **Key Statistics**
1962 1962  1. **General Observations:**
1963 1963   - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1964 1964   - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
... ... @@ -1971,10 +1971,9 @@
1971 1971   - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1972 1972   - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1973 1973  
1974 -----
1814 +---
1975 1975  
1976 -## **Findings**##
1977 -
1816 +## **Findings**
1978 1978  1. **Primary Observations:**
1979 1979   - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1980 1980   - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
... ... @@ -1987,10 +1987,9 @@
1987 1987   - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1988 1988   - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1989 1989  
1990 -----
1829 +---
1991 1991  
1992 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1993 -
1831 +## **Critique and Observations**
1994 1994  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1995 1995   - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1996 1996   - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
... ... @@ -2003,132 +2003,46 @@
2003 2003   - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
2004 2004   - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
2005 2005  
2006 -----
1844 +---
2007 2007  
2008 2008  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2009 2009  - Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
2010 2010  - Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
2011 -- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
1849 +- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
2012 2012  
2013 -----
1851 +---
2014 2014  
2015 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2016 -
1853 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2017 2017  1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
2018 2018  2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
2019 2019  3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
2020 2020  
2021 -----
1858 +---
2022 2022  
2023 2023  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2024 -This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
1861 +This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.
2025 2025  
2026 -----
1863 +---
2027 2027  
2028 2028  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2029 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
2030 -{{/expand}}
1866 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
2031 2031  
2032 -
2033 -== Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions ==
2034 -
2035 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
2036 -**Source:** *Politics & Policy*
2037 -**Date of Publication:** *2007*
2038 -**Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
2039 -**Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
2040 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
2041 -**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
2042 -
2043 -----
2044 -
2045 -## **Key Statistics**##
2046 -
2047 -1. **General Observations:**
2048 - - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
2049 - - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
2050 -
2051 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
2052 - - **Equality-based framing decreases opposition** to same-sex marriage.
2053 - - **Morality-based framing increases opposition** to same-sex marriage.
2054 -
2055 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
2056 - - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
2057 - - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
2058 -
2059 -----
2060 -
2061 -## **Findings**##
2062 -
2063 -1. **Primary Observations:**
2064 - - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
2065 - - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
2066 -
2067 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
2068 - - **Religious and conservative audiences** respond more to morality-based framing.
2069 - - **Younger and progressive audiences** respond more to equality-based framing.
2070 -
2071 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
2072 - - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
2073 - - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
2074 -
2075 -----
2076 -
2077 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2078 -
2079 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2080 - - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
2081 - - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
2082 -
2083 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
2084 - - Focuses **only on U.S. media coverage**, limiting global applicability.
2085 - - Does not account for **social media's growing influence** on public opinion.
2086 -
2087 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
2088 - - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
2089 - - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
2090 -
2091 -----
2092 -
2093 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
2094 -- Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
2095 -- Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
2096 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
2097 -
2098 -----
2099 -
2100 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2101 -
2102 -1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
2103 -2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
2104 -3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
2105 -
2106 -----
2107 -
2108 -## **Summary of Research Study**
2109 -This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
2110 -
2111 -----
2112 -
2113 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
2114 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
2115 2115  {{/expand}}
2116 2116  
1870 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
2117 2117  
2118 -== Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion ==
2119 2119  
2120 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
1873 +{{expand title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion" expanded="false"}}
2121 2121  **Source:** *Journal of Communication*
2122 2122  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
2123 2123  **Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
2124 2124  **Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
2125 2125  **DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2126 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
1879 +**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*
2127 2127  
2128 -----
1881 +---
2129 2129  
2130 -## **Key Statistics**##
2131 -
1883 +## **Key Statistics**
2132 2132  1. **General Observations:**
2133 2133   - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
2134 2134   - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
... ... @@ -2141,10 +2141,9 @@
2141 2141   - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
2142 2142   - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
2143 2143  
2144 -----
1896 +---
2145 2145  
2146 -## **Findings**##
2147 -
1898 +## **Findings**
2148 2148  1. **Primary Observations:**
2149 2149   - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
2150 2150   - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
... ... @@ -2157,10 +2157,9 @@
2157 2157   - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
2158 2158   - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
2159 2159  
2160 -----
1911 +---
2161 2161  
2162 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2163 -
1913 +## **Critique and Observations**
2164 2164  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2165 2165   - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
2166 2166   - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
... ... @@ -2173,28 +2173,31 @@
2173 2173   - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
2174 2174   - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
2175 2175  
2176 -----
1926 +---
2177 2177  
2178 2178  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2179 2179  - Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
2180 2180  - Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
2181 -- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
1931 +- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
2182 2182  
2183 -----
1933 +---
2184 2184  
2185 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2186 -
1935 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2187 2187  1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
2188 2188  2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
2189 2189  3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
2190 2190  
2191 -----
1940 +---
2192 2192  
2193 2193  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2194 -This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
1943 +This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.
2195 2195  
2196 -----
1945 +---
2197 2197  
2198 2198  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2199 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
1948 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
1949 +
2200 2200  {{/expand}}
1951 +
1952 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1953 +