0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 83.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 07:10
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 79.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 06:48
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,23 +1,21 @@
1 1  = Research at a Glance =
2 2  
3 +== Introduction ==
3 3  
5 +Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various fields such as **social psychology, public policy, behavioral economics, and more**. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout.
4 4  
5 -Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various important Racial themes. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout. I wanted to make this for a couple of reasons. Number one is organization. There are a ton of useful studies out there that expose the truth, sometimes inadvertently. You'll notice that in this initial draft the summaries are often woke and reflect the bias of the AI writing them as well as the researchers politically correct conclusions in most cases. That's because I havent gotten to going through and pointing out the reasons I put all of them in here. There is often an underlying hypocrisy or double standar, saying the quiet part out loud, or conclusions that are so much of an antithesis to what the data shows that made me want to include it. At least, thats the idea for once its polished. I have about 150 more studies to upload, so it will be a few weeks before I get through it all. Until such time, feel free to search for them yourself and edit in what you find, or add your own studies. If you like you can do it manually, or if you'd rather go the route I did, just feed the study into an AI and tell them to summarize the study using the following format:
7 +=== How to Use This Repository ===
6 6  
7 -
8 8  - Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
9 9  - Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
10 10  - Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
11 11  - If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
12 -- You'll also find a download link to the original full study in pdf form at the bottom of the collapsible block.
13 13  
14 14  
15 -{{toc/}}
16 16  
16 +== Research Studies Repository ==
17 17  
18 18  
19 -
20 -
21 21  = Genetics =
22 22  
23 23  
... ... @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
31 31  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
32 32  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
33 33  
34 -----
32 +-----
35 35  
36 36  ## **Key Statistics**##
37 37  
... ... @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
47 47   - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
48 48   - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
49 49  
50 -----
48 +-----
51 51  
52 52  ## **Findings**##
53 53  
... ... @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
63 63   - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
64 64   - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
65 65  
66 -----
64 +-----
67 67  
68 68  ## **Critique and Observations**##
69 69  
... ... @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
79 79   - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
80 80   - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
81 81  
82 -----
80 +-----
83 83  
84 84  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
85 85  - Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
... ... @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
86 86  - Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
87 87  - Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
88 88  
89 -----
87 +-----
90 90  
91 91  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
92 92  
... ... @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
94 94  2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
95 95  3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
96 96  
97 -----
95 +-----
98 98  
99 99  ## **Summary of Research Study**
100 100  This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
... ... @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
101 101  
102 102  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
103 103  
104 -----
102 +-----
105 105  
106 106  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
107 107  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
118 118  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
119 119  **Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
120 120  
121 -----
119 +-----
122 122  
123 123  ## **Key Statistics**##
124 124  
... ... @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@
134 134   - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
135 135   - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
136 136  
137 -----
135 +-----
138 138  
139 139  ## **Findings**##
140 140  
... ... @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@
150 150   - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
151 151   - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
152 152  
153 -----
151 +-----
154 154  
155 155  ## **Critique and Observations**##
156 156  
... ... @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@
166 166   - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
167 167   - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
168 168  
169 -----
167 +-----
170 170  
171 171  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
172 172  - Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
... ... @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@
173 173  - Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
174 174  - Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
175 175  
176 -----
174 +-----
177 177  
178 178  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
179 179  
... ... @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@
181 181  2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
182 182  3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
183 183  
184 -----
182 +-----
185 185  
186 186  ## **Summary of Research Study**
187 187  This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
... ... @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@
188 188  
189 189  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
190 190  
191 -----
189 +-----
192 192  
193 193  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
194 194  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
205 205  **DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
206 206  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
207 207  
208 -----
206 +-----
209 209  
210 210  ## **Key Statistics**##
211 211  
... ... @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@
221 221   - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
222 222   - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
223 223  
224 -----
222 +-----
225 225  
226 226  ## **Findings**##
227 227  
... ... @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@
237 237   - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
238 238   - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
239 239  
240 -----
238 +-----
241 241  
242 242  ## **Critique and Observations**##
243 243  
... ... @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@
253 253   - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
254 254   - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
255 255  
256 -----
254 +-----
257 257  
258 258  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
259 259  - Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
... ... @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@
260 260  - Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
261 261  - Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
262 262  
263 -----
261 +-----
264 264  
265 265  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
266 266  
... ... @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@
268 268  2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
269 269  3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
270 270  
271 -----
269 +-----
272 272  
273 273  ## **Summary of Research Study**
274 274  This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
... ... @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@
275 275  
276 276  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
277 277  
278 -----
276 +-----
279 279  
280 280  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
281 281  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@
292 292  **DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
293 293  **Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
294 294  
295 -----
293 +-----
296 296  
297 297  ## **Key Statistics**##
298 298  
... ... @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@
308 308   - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
309 309   - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
310 310  
311 -----
309 +-----
312 312  
313 313  ## **Findings**##
314 314  
... ... @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@
324 324   - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
325 325   - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
326 326  
327 -----
325 +-----
328 328  
329 329  ## **Critique and Observations**##
330 330  
... ... @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@
340 340   - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
341 341   - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
342 342  
343 -----
341 +-----
344 344  
345 345  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
346 346  - Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
... ... @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@
347 347  - Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
348 348  - Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
349 349  
350 -----
348 +-----
351 351  
352 352  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
353 353  
... ... @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@
355 355  2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
356 356  3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
357 357  
358 -----
356 +-----
359 359  
360 360  ## **Summary of Research Study**
361 361  This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
... ... @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@
362 362  
363 363  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
364 364  
365 -----
363 +-----
366 366  
367 367  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
368 368  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@
379 379  **DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
380 380  **Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
381 381  
382 -----
380 +-----
383 383  
384 384  ## **Key Statistics**##
385 385  
... ... @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@
395 395   - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
396 396   - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
397 397  
398 -----
396 +-----
399 399  
400 400  ## **Findings**##
401 401  
... ... @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@
412 412   - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
413 413   - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
414 414  
415 -----
413 +-----
416 416  
417 417  ## **Critique and Observations**##
418 418  
... ... @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@
428 428   - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
429 429   - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
430 430  
431 -----
429 +-----
432 432  
433 433  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
434 434  - Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
... ... @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@
435 435  - Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
436 436  - Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
437 437  
438 -----
436 +-----
439 439  
440 440  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
441 441  
... ... @@ -443,12 +443,12 @@
443 443  2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
444 444  3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
445 445  
446 -----
444 +-----
447 447  
448 448  ## **Summary of Research Study**
449 449  This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
450 450  
451 -----
449 +-----
452 452  
453 453  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
454 454  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -465,7 +465,7 @@
465 465  **DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
466 466  **Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
467 467  
468 -----
466 +-----
469 469  
470 470  ## **Key Statistics**##
471 471  
... ... @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@
481 481   - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
482 482   - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
483 483  
484 -----
482 +-----
485 485  
486 486  ## **Findings**##
487 487  
... ... @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@
497 497   - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
498 498   - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
499 499  
500 -----
498 +-----
501 501  
502 502  ## **Critique and Observations**##
503 503  
... ... @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@
513 513   - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
514 514   - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
515 515  
516 -----
514 +-----
517 517  
518 518  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
519 519  - Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
... ... @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@
520 520  - Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
521 521  - Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
522 522  
523 -----
521 +-----
524 524  
525 525  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
526 526  
... ... @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@
528 528  2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
529 529  3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
530 530  
531 -----
529 +-----
532 532  
533 533  ## **Summary of Research Study**
534 534  This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
... ... @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@
535 535  
536 536  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
537 537  
538 -----
536 +-----
539 539  
540 540  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
541 541  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@
552 552  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
553 553  **Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
554 554  
555 -----
553 +-----
556 556  
557 557  ## **Key Statistics**##
558 558  
... ... @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@
568 568   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
569 569   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
570 570  
571 -----
569 +-----
572 572  
573 573  ## **Findings**##
574 574  
... ... @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@
584 584   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
585 585   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
586 586  
587 -----
585 +-----
588 588  
589 589  ## **Critique and Observations**##
590 590  
... ... @@ -600,7 +600,7 @@
600 600   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
601 601   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
602 602  
603 -----
601 +-----
604 604  
605 605  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
606 606  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
... ... @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@
607 607  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
608 608  - Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
609 609  
610 -----
608 +-----
611 611  
612 612  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
613 613  
... ... @@ -615,7 +615,7 @@
615 615  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
616 616  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
617 617  
618 -----
616 +-----
619 619  
620 620  ## **Summary of Research Study**
621 621  This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
... ... @@ -622,7 +622,7 @@
622 622  
623 623  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
624 624  
625 -----
623 +-----
626 626  
627 627  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
628 628  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@
639 639  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
640 640  **Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
641 641  
642 -----
640 +-----
643 643  
644 644  ## **Key Statistics**##
645 645  
... ... @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@
655 655   - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
656 656   - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
657 657  
658 -----
656 +-----
659 659  
660 660  ## **Findings**##
661 661  
... ... @@ -671,7 +671,7 @@
671 671   - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
672 672   - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
673 673  
674 -----
672 +-----
675 675  
676 676  ## **Critique and Observations**##
677 677  
... ... @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@
687 687   - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
688 688   - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
689 689  
690 -----
688 +-----
691 691  
692 692  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
693 693  - Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
... ... @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@
694 694  - Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
695 695  - Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
696 696  
697 -----
695 +-----
698 698  
699 699  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
700 700  
... ... @@ -702,7 +702,7 @@
702 702  2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
703 703  3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
704 704  
705 -----
703 +-----
706 706  
707 707  ## **Summary of Research Study**
708 708  This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
... ... @@ -709,7 +709,7 @@
709 709  
710 710  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
711 711  
712 -----
710 +-----
713 713  
714 714  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
715 715  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -726,7 +726,7 @@
726 726  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
727 727  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
728 728  
729 -----
727 +-----
730 730  
731 731  ## **Key Statistics**##
732 732  
... ... @@ -742,7 +742,7 @@
742 742   - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
743 743   - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
744 744  
745 -----
743 +-----
746 746  
747 747  ## **Findings**##
748 748  
... ... @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@
758 758   - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
759 759   - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
760 760  
761 -----
759 +-----
762 762  
763 763  ## **Critique and Observations**##
764 764  
... ... @@ -774,7 +774,7 @@
774 774   - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
775 775   - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
776 776  
777 -----
775 +-----
778 778  
779 779  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
780 780  - Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
... ... @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@
781 781  - Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
782 782  - Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
783 783  
784 -----
782 +-----
785 785  
786 786  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
787 787  
... ... @@ -789,7 +789,7 @@
789 789  2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
790 790  3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
791 791  
792 -----
790 +-----
793 793  
794 794  ## **Summary of Research Study**
795 795  This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.  ##
... ... @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@
796 796  
797 797  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
798 798  
799 -----
797 +-----
800 800  
801 801  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
802 802  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -815,7 +815,7 @@
815 815  
816 816  **Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
817 817  
818 - **Key Statistics**
816 +=== **Key Statistics** ===
819 819  
820 820  1. **General Observations:**
821 821   - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
... ... @@ -825,12 +825,12 @@
825 825   - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
826 826   - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
827 827  
828 - **Findings**
826 +=== **Findings** ===
829 829  
830 830  - Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
831 831  - Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
832 832  
833 - **Relevance to Subproject**
831 +=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
834 834  
835 835  - Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
836 836  - Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
... ... @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@
837 837  {{/expand}}
838 838  
839 839  
840 -----
838 +-----
841 841  
842 842  = Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
843 843  
... ... @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@
852 852  **DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
853 853  **Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
854 854  
855 -----
853 +-----
856 856  
857 857  ## **Key Statistics**##
858 858  
... ... @@ -868,7 +868,7 @@
868 868   - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
869 869   - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
870 870  
871 -----
869 +-----
872 872  
873 873  ## **Findings**##
874 874  
... ... @@ -884,7 +884,7 @@
884 884   - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
885 885   - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
886 886  
887 -----
885 +-----
888 888  
889 889  ## **Critique and Observations**##
890 890  
... ... @@ -900,13 +900,13 @@
900 900   - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
901 901   - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
902 902  
903 -----
901 +-----
904 904  
905 905  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
906 906  - Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
907 907  - Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
908 908  
909 -----
907 +-----
910 910  
911 911  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
912 912  
... ... @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@
913 913  1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
914 914  2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
915 915  
916 -----
914 +-----
917 917  
918 918  ## **Summary of Research Study**
919 919  This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.  ##
... ... @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@
920 920  
921 921  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
922 922  
923 -----
921 +-----
924 924  
925 925  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
926 926  {{velocity}}
... ... @@ -944,7 +944,7 @@
944 944  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
945 945  **Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
946 946  
947 -----
945 +-----
948 948  
949 949  ## **Key Statistics**##
950 950  
... ... @@ -962,7 +962,7 @@
962 962   - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
963 963   - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
964 964  
965 -----
963 +-----
966 966  
967 967  ## **Findings**##
968 968  
... ... @@ -978,7 +978,7 @@
978 978   - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
979 979   - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
980 980  
981 -----
979 +-----
982 982  
983 983  ## **Critique and Observations**##
984 984  
... ... @@ -994,7 +994,7 @@
994 994   - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
995 995   - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
996 996  
997 -----
995 +-----
998 998  
999 999  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1000 1000  - Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
... ... @@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@
1001 1001  - Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
1002 1002  - Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
1003 1003  
1004 -----
1002 +-----
1005 1005  
1006 1006  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1007 1007  
... ... @@ -1009,12 +1009,12 @@
1009 1009  2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
1010 1010  3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
1011 1011  
1012 -----
1010 +-----
1013 1013  
1014 1014  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1015 1015  This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
1016 1016  
1017 -----
1015 +-----
1018 1018  
1019 1019  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1020 1020  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@
1031 1031  **DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
1032 1032  **Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
1033 1033  
1034 -----
1032 +-----
1035 1035  
1036 1036  ## **Key Statistics**##
1037 1037  
... ... @@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@
1047 1047   - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
1048 1048   - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
1049 1049  
1050 -----
1048 +-----
1051 1051  
1052 1052  ## **Findings**##
1053 1053  
... ... @@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@
1063 1063   - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
1064 1064   - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
1065 1065  
1066 -----
1064 +-----
1067 1067  
1068 1068  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1069 1069  
... ... @@ -1079,7 +1079,7 @@
1079 1079   - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
1080 1080   - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
1081 1081  
1082 -----
1080 +-----
1083 1083  
1084 1084  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1085 1085  - Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
... ... @@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@
1086 1086  - Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
1087 1087  - Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
1088 1088  
1089 -----
1087 +-----
1090 1090  
1091 1091  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1092 1092  
... ... @@ -1094,7 +1094,7 @@
1094 1094  2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
1095 1095  3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
1096 1096  
1097 -----
1095 +-----
1098 1098  
1099 1099  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1100 1100  This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
... ... @@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@
1101 1101  
1102 1102  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1103 1103  
1104 -----
1102 +-----
1105 1105  
1106 1106  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1107 1107  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@
1121 1121  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1122 1122  **Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1123 1123  
1124 -----
1122 +-----
1125 1125  
1126 1126  ## **Key Statistics**##
1127 1127  
... ... @@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@
1137 1137   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1138 1138   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1139 1139  
1140 -----
1138 +-----
1141 1141  
1142 1142  ## **Findings**##
1143 1143  
... ... @@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@
1153 1153   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1154 1154   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1155 1155  
1156 -----
1154 +-----
1157 1157  
1158 1158  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1159 1159  
... ... @@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@
1169 1169   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1170 1170   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1171 1171  
1172 -----
1170 +-----
1173 1173  
1174 1174  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1175 1175  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
... ... @@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@
1176 1176  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1177 1177  - Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1178 1178  
1179 -----
1177 +-----
1180 1180  
1181 1181  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1182 1182  
... ... @@ -1184,7 +1184,7 @@
1184 1184  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1185 1185  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1186 1186  
1187 -----
1185 +-----
1188 1188  
1189 1189  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1190 1190  This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
... ... @@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@
1191 1191  
1192 1192  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1193 1193  
1194 -----
1192 +-----
1195 1195  
1196 1196  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1197 1197  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@
1208 1208  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1209 1209  **Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1210 1210  
1211 -----
1209 +-----
1212 1212  
1213 1213  ## **Key Statistics**##
1214 1214  
... ... @@ -1224,7 +1224,7 @@
1224 1224   - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1225 1225   - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1226 1226  
1227 -----
1225 +-----
1228 1228  
1229 1229  ## **Findings**##
1230 1230  
... ... @@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@
1240 1240   - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1241 1241   - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1242 1242  
1243 -----
1241 +-----
1244 1244  
1245 1245  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1246 1246  
... ... @@ -1256,7 +1256,7 @@
1256 1256   - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1257 1257   - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1258 1258  
1259 -----
1257 +-----
1260 1260  
1261 1261  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1262 1262  - Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
... ... @@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@
1263 1263  - Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1264 1264  - Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1265 1265  
1266 -----
1264 +-----
1267 1267  
1268 1268  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1269 1269  
... ... @@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@
1271 1271  2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1272 1272  3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1273 1273  
1274 -----
1272 +-----
1275 1275  
1276 1276  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1277 1277  This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
... ... @@ -1278,7 +1278,7 @@
1278 1278  
1279 1279  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1280 1280  
1281 -----
1279 +-----
1282 1282  
1283 1283  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1284 1284  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1295,7 +1295,7 @@
1295 1295  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1296 1296  **Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1297 1297  
1298 -----
1296 +-----
1299 1299  
1300 1300  ## **Key Statistics**##
1301 1301  
... ... @@ -1311,7 +1311,7 @@
1311 1311   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1312 1312   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1313 1313  
1314 -----
1312 +-----
1315 1315  
1316 1316  ## **Findings**##
1317 1317  
... ... @@ -1327,7 +1327,7 @@
1327 1327   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1328 1328   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1329 1329  
1330 -----
1328 +-----
1331 1331  
1332 1332  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1333 1333  
... ... @@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@
1343 1343   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1344 1344   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1345 1345  
1346 -----
1344 +-----
1347 1347  
1348 1348  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1349 1349  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
... ... @@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@
1350 1350  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1351 1351  - Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1352 1352  
1353 -----
1351 +-----
1354 1354  
1355 1355  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1356 1356  
... ... @@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@
1358 1358  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1359 1359  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1360 1360  
1361 -----
1359 +-----
1362 1362  
1363 1363  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1364 1364  This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
... ... @@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@
1365 1365  
1366 1366  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1367 1367  
1368 -----
1366 +-----
1369 1369  
1370 1370  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1371 1371  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1449,7 +1449,7 @@
1449 1449  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1450 1450  **Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1451 1451  
1452 -----
1450 +-----
1453 1453  
1454 1454  ## **Key Statistics**##
1455 1455  
... ... @@ -1465,7 +1465,7 @@
1465 1465   - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1466 1466   - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1467 1467  
1468 -----
1466 +-----
1469 1469  
1470 1470  ## **Findings**##
1471 1471  
... ... @@ -1481,7 +1481,7 @@
1481 1481   - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1482 1482   - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1483 1483  
1484 -----
1482 +-----
1485 1485  
1486 1486  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1487 1487  
... ... @@ -1497,7 +1497,7 @@
1497 1497   - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1498 1498   - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1499 1499  
1500 -----
1498 +-----
1501 1501  
1502 1502  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1503 1503  - Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
... ... @@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@
1504 1504  - Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1505 1505  - Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1506 1506  
1507 -----
1505 +-----
1508 1508  
1509 1509  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1510 1510  
... ... @@ -1512,7 +1512,7 @@
1512 1512  2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1513 1513  3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1514 1514  
1515 -----
1513 +-----
1516 1516  
1517 1517  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1518 1518  This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.  ##
... ... @@ -1519,7 +1519,7 @@
1519 1519  
1520 1520  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1521 1521  
1522 -----
1520 +-----
1523 1523  
1524 1524  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1525 1525  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1538,7 +1538,7 @@
1538 1538  **DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1539 1539  **Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1540 1540  
1541 -----
1539 +-----
1542 1542  
1543 1543  ## **Key Statistics**##
1544 1544  
... ... @@ -1554,7 +1554,7 @@
1554 1554   - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1555 1555   - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1556 1556  
1557 -----
1555 +-----
1558 1558  
1559 1559  ## **Findings**##
1560 1560  
... ... @@ -1570,7 +1570,7 @@
1570 1570   - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1571 1571   - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1572 1572  
1573 -----
1571 +-----
1574 1574  
1575 1575  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1576 1576  
... ... @@ -1586,7 +1586,7 @@
1586 1586   - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1587 1587   - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1588 1588  
1589 -----
1587 +-----
1590 1590  
1591 1591  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1592 1592  - Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
... ... @@ -1593,7 +1593,7 @@
1593 1593  - Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1594 1594  - Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1595 1595  
1596 -----
1594 +-----
1597 1597  
1598 1598  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1599 1599  
... ... @@ -1601,7 +1601,7 @@
1601 1601  2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1602 1602  3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1603 1603  
1604 -----
1602 +-----
1605 1605  
1606 1606  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1607 1607  This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
... ... @@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@
1608 1608  
1609 1609  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1610 1610  
1611 -----
1609 +-----
1612 1612  
1613 1613  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1614 1614  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1625,7 +1625,7 @@
1625 1625  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1626 1626  **Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1627 1627  
1628 -----
1626 +-----
1629 1629  
1630 1630  ## **Key Statistics**##
1631 1631  
... ... @@ -1641,7 +1641,7 @@
1641 1641   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1642 1642   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1643 1643  
1644 -----
1642 +-----
1645 1645  
1646 1646  ## **Findings**##
1647 1647  
... ... @@ -1657,7 +1657,7 @@
1657 1657   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1658 1658   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1659 1659  
1660 -----
1658 +-----
1661 1661  
1662 1662  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1663 1663  
... ... @@ -1673,7 +1673,7 @@
1673 1673   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1674 1674   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1675 1675  
1676 -----
1674 +-----
1677 1677  
1678 1678  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1679 1679  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
... ... @@ -1680,7 +1680,7 @@
1680 1680  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1681 1681  - Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1682 1682  
1683 -----
1681 +-----
1684 1684  
1685 1685  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1686 1686  
... ... @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@
1688 1688  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1689 1689  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1690 1690  
1691 -----
1689 +-----
1692 1692  
1693 1693  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1694 1694  This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
... ... @@ -1695,7 +1695,7 @@
1695 1695  
1696 1696  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1697 1697  
1698 -----
1696 +-----
1699 1699  
1700 1700  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1701 1701  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1712,7 +1712,7 @@
1712 1712  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1713 1713  **Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1714 1714  
1715 -----
1713 +-----
1716 1716  
1717 1717  ## **Key Statistics**##
1718 1718  
... ... @@ -1728,7 +1728,7 @@
1728 1728   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1729 1729   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1730 1730  
1731 -----
1729 +-----
1732 1732  
1733 1733  ## **Findings**##
1734 1734  
... ... @@ -1744,7 +1744,7 @@
1744 1744   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1745 1745   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1746 1746  
1747 -----
1745 +-----
1748 1748  
1749 1749  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1750 1750  
... ... @@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@
1760 1760   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1761 1761   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1762 1762  
1763 -----
1761 +-----
1764 1764  
1765 1765  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1766 1766  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
... ... @@ -1767,7 +1767,7 @@
1767 1767  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1768 1768  - Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1769 1769  
1770 -----
1768 +-----
1771 1771  
1772 1772  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1773 1773  
... ... @@ -1775,7 +1775,7 @@
1775 1775  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1776 1776  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1777 1777  
1778 -----
1776 +-----
1779 1779  
1780 1780  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1781 1781  This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
... ... @@ -1782,7 +1782,7 @@
1782 1782  
1783 1783  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1784 1784  
1785 -----
1783 +-----
1786 1786  
1787 1787  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1788 1788  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1799,7 +1799,7 @@
1799 1799  **DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1800 1800  **Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1801 1801  
1802 -----
1800 +-----
1803 1803  
1804 1804  ## **Key Statistics**##
1805 1805  
... ... @@ -1815,7 +1815,7 @@
1815 1815   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1816 1816   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1817 1817  
1818 -----
1816 +-----
1819 1819  
1820 1820  ## **Findings**##
1821 1821  
... ... @@ -1831,7 +1831,7 @@
1831 1831   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1832 1832   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1833 1833  
1834 -----
1832 +-----
1835 1835  
1836 1836  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1837 1837  
... ... @@ -1847,7 +1847,7 @@
1847 1847   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1848 1848   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1849 1849  
1850 -----
1848 +-----
1851 1851  
1852 1852  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1853 1853  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
... ... @@ -1854,7 +1854,7 @@
1854 1854  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1855 1855  - Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
1856 1856  
1857 -----
1855 +-----
1858 1858  
1859 1859  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1860 1860  
... ... @@ -1862,7 +1862,7 @@
1862 1862  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1863 1863  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1864 1864  
1865 -----
1863 +-----
1866 1866  
1867 1867  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1868 1868  This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
... ... @@ -1869,7 +1869,7 @@
1869 1869  
1870 1870  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1871 1871  
1872 -----
1870 +-----
1873 1873  
1874 1874  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1875 1875  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1889,7 +1889,7 @@
1889 1889  **DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1890 1890  **Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1891 1891  
1892 -----
1890 +-----
1893 1893  
1894 1894  ## **Key Statistics**##
1895 1895  
... ... @@ -1905,7 +1905,7 @@
1905 1905   - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1906 1906   - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1907 1907  
1908 -----
1906 +-----
1909 1909  
1910 1910  ## **Findings**##
1911 1911  
... ... @@ -1921,7 +1921,7 @@
1921 1921   - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1922 1922   - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1923 1923  
1924 -----
1922 +-----
1925 1925  
1926 1926  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1927 1927  
... ... @@ -1937,7 +1937,7 @@
1937 1937   - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1938 1938   - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1939 1939  
1940 -----
1938 +-----
1941 1941  
1942 1942  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1943 1943  - Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
... ... @@ -1944,7 +1944,7 @@
1944 1944  - Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1945 1945  - Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
1946 1946  
1947 -----
1945 +-----
1948 1948  
1949 1949  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1950 1950  
... ... @@ -1952,12 +1952,12 @@
1952 1952  2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1953 1953  3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1954 1954  
1955 -----
1953 +-----
1956 1956  
1957 1957  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1958 1958  This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
1959 1959  
1960 -----
1958 +-----
1961 1961  
1962 1962  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1963 1963  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1974,7 +1974,7 @@
1974 1974  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
1975 1975  **Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
1976 1976  
1977 -----
1975 +-----
1978 1978  
1979 1979  ## **Key Statistics**##
1980 1980  
... ... @@ -1990,7 +1990,7 @@
1990 1990   - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
1991 1991   - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
1992 1992  
1993 -----
1991 +-----
1994 1994  
1995 1995  ## **Findings**##
1996 1996  
... ... @@ -2006,7 +2006,7 @@
2006 2006   - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
2007 2007   - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
2008 2008  
2009 -----
2007 +-----
2010 2010  
2011 2011  ## **Critique and Observations**##
2012 2012  
... ... @@ -2022,7 +2022,7 @@
2022 2022   - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
2023 2023   - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
2024 2024  
2025 -----
2023 +-----
2026 2026  
2027 2027  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2028 2028  - Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
... ... @@ -2029,7 +2029,7 @@
2029 2029  - Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
2030 2030  - Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
2031 2031  
2032 -----
2030 +-----
2033 2033  
2034 2034  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2035 2035  
... ... @@ -2037,12 +2037,12 @@
2037 2037  2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
2038 2038  3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
2039 2039  
2040 -----
2038 +-----
2041 2041  
2042 2042  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2043 2043  This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
2044 2044  
2045 -----
2043 +-----
2046 2046  
2047 2047  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2048 2048  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -2059,7 +2059,7 @@
2059 2059  **DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2060 2060  **Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
2061 2061  
2062 -----
2060 +-----
2063 2063  
2064 2064  ## **Key Statistics**##
2065 2065  
... ... @@ -2075,7 +2075,7 @@
2075 2075   - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
2076 2076   - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
2077 2077  
2078 -----
2076 +-----
2079 2079  
2080 2080  ## **Findings**##
2081 2081  
... ... @@ -2091,7 +2091,7 @@
2091 2091   - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
2092 2092   - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
2093 2093  
2094 -----
2092 +-----
2095 2095  
2096 2096  ## **Critique and Observations**##
2097 2097  
... ... @@ -2107,7 +2107,7 @@
2107 2107   - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
2108 2108   - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
2109 2109  
2110 -----
2108 +-----
2111 2111  
2112 2112  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2113 2113  - Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
... ... @@ -2114,7 +2114,7 @@
2114 2114  - Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
2115 2115  - Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
2116 2116  
2117 -----
2115 +-----
2118 2118  
2119 2119  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2120 2120  
... ... @@ -2122,13 +2122,16 @@
2122 2122  2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
2123 2123  3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
2124 2124  
2125 -----
2123 +-----
2126 2126  
2127 2127  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2128 2128  This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
2129 2129  
2130 -----
2128 +-----
2131 2131  
2132 2132  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2133 2133  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
2134 2134  {{/expand}}
2133 +
2134 +
2135 +