0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 82.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 06:52
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 77.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 06:43
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -12,29 +12,23 @@
12 12  - If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
13 13  
14 14  
15 -{{toc/}}
16 16  
17 -
18 18  == Research Studies Repository ==
19 19  
20 -
21 21  = Genetics =
22 22  
23 -
24 24  == Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History ==
25 -
26 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
21 +{{expand title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History" expanded="false"}}
27 27  **Source:** *Nature*
28 28  **Date of Publication:** *2009*
29 29  **Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
30 30  **Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
31 31  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
32 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
27 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*
33 33  
34 -----
29 +---
35 35  
36 -## **Key Statistics**##
37 -
31 +## **Key Statistics**
38 38  1. **General Observations:**
39 39   - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
40 40   - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
... ... @@ -47,10 +47,9 @@
47 47   - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
48 48   - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
49 49  
50 -----
44 +---
51 51  
52 -## **Findings**##
53 -
46 +## **Findings**
54 54  1. **Primary Observations:**
55 55   - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
56 56   - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
... ... @@ -63,10 +63,9 @@
63 63   - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
64 64   - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
65 65  
66 -----
59 +---
67 67  
68 -## **Critique and Observations**##
69 -
61 +## **Critique and Observations**
70 70  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
71 71   - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
72 72   - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
... ... @@ -79,49 +79,48 @@
79 79   - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
80 80   - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
81 81  
82 -----
74 +---
83 83  
84 84  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
85 85  - Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
86 86  - Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
87 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
79 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
88 88  
89 -----
81 +---
90 90  
91 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
92 -
83 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
93 93  1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
94 94  2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
95 95  3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
96 96  
97 -----
88 +---
98 98  
99 99  ## **Summary of Research Study**
100 -This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
91 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.
101 101  
102 102  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
103 103  
104 -----
95 +---
105 105  
106 106  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
107 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
98 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
99 +
108 108  {{/expand}}
109 109  
110 110  
111 -== Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations ==
112 112  
113 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
104 +== Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations ==
105 +{{expand title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations" expanded="false"}}
114 114  **Source:** *Nature*
115 115  **Date of Publication:** *2016*
116 116  **Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
117 117  **Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
118 118  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
119 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
111 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
120 120  
121 -----
113 +---
122 122  
123 -## **Key Statistics**##
124 -
115 +## **Key Statistics**
125 125  1. **General Observations:**
126 126   - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
127 127   - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
... ... @@ -134,10 +134,9 @@
134 134   - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
135 135   - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
136 136  
137 -----
128 +---
138 138  
139 -## **Findings**##
140 -
130 +## **Findings**
141 141  1. **Primary Observations:**
142 142   - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
143 143   - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
... ... @@ -150,10 +150,9 @@
150 150   - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
151 151   - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
152 152  
153 -----
143 +---
154 154  
155 -## **Critique and Observations**##
156 -
145 +## **Critique and Observations**
157 157  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
158 158   - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
159 159   - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
... ... @@ -166,49 +166,47 @@
166 166   - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
167 167   - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
168 168  
169 -----
158 +---
170 170  
171 171  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
172 172  - Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
173 173  - Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
174 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
163 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
175 175  
176 -----
165 +---
177 177  
178 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
179 -
167 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
180 180  1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
181 181  2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
182 182  3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
183 183  
184 -----
172 +---
185 185  
186 186  ## **Summary of Research Study**
187 -This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
175 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.
188 188  
189 189  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
190 190  
191 -----
179 +---
192 192  
193 193  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
194 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
182 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
183 +
195 195  {{/expand}}
196 196  
197 197  
198 198  == Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies ==
199 -
200 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
188 +{{expand title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies" expanded="false"}}
201 201  **Source:** *Nature Genetics*
202 202  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
203 203  **Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
204 204  **Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
205 205  **DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
206 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
194 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
207 207  
208 -----
196 +---
209 209  
210 -## **Key Statistics**##
211 -
198 +## **Key Statistics**
212 212  1. **General Observations:**
213 213   - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
214 214   - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
... ... @@ -221,16 +221,15 @@
221 221   - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
222 222   - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
223 223  
224 -----
211 +---
225 225  
226 -## **Findings**##
227 -
213 +## **Findings**
228 228  1. **Primary Observations:**
229 229   - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
230 230   - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
231 231  
232 232  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
233 - - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (70-80%)**.
219 + - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (~70-80%)**.
234 234   - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
235 235  
236 236  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
... ... @@ -237,10 +237,9 @@
237 237   - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
238 238   - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
239 239  
240 -----
226 +---
241 241  
242 -## **Critique and Observations**##
243 -
228 +## **Critique and Observations**
244 244  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
245 245   - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
246 246   - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
... ... @@ -253,49 +253,47 @@
253 253   - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
254 254   - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
255 255  
256 -----
241 +---
257 257  
258 258  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
259 259  - Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
260 260  - Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
261 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
246 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
262 262  
263 -----
248 +---
264 264  
265 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
266 -
250 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
267 267  1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
268 268  2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
269 269  3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
270 270  
271 -----
255 +---
272 272  
273 273  ## **Summary of Research Study**
274 -This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
258 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.
275 275  
276 276  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
277 277  
278 -----
262 +---
279 279  
280 280  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
281 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
265 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
266 +
282 282  {{/expand}}
283 283  
284 284  
285 285  == Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease ==
286 -
287 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
271 +{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}}
288 288  **Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
289 289  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
290 290  **Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
291 291  **Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
292 292  **DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
293 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
277 +**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*
294 294  
295 -----
279 +---
296 296  
297 -## **Key Statistics**##
298 -
281 +## **Key Statistics**
299 299  1. **General Observations:**
300 300   - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
301 301   - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
... ... @@ -308,10 +308,9 @@
308 308   - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
309 309   - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
310 310  
311 -----
294 +---
312 312  
313 -## **Findings**##
314 -
296 +## **Findings**
315 315  1. **Primary Observations:**
316 316   - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
317 317   - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
... ... @@ -324,10 +324,9 @@
324 324   - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
325 325   - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
326 326  
327 -----
309 +---
328 328  
329 -## **Critique and Observations**##
330 -
311 +## **Critique and Observations**
331 331  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
332 332   - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
333 333   - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
... ... @@ -340,49 +340,47 @@
340 340   - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
341 341   - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
342 342  
343 -----
324 +---
344 344  
345 345  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
346 346  - Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
347 347  - Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
348 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
329 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
349 349  
350 -----
331 +---
351 351  
352 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
353 -
333 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
354 354  1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
355 355  2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
356 356  3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
357 357  
358 -----
338 +---
359 359  
360 360  ## **Summary of Research Study**
361 -This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
341 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.
362 362  
363 363  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
364 364  
365 -----
345 +---
366 366  
367 367  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
368 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
348 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
349 +
369 369  {{/expand}}
370 370  
371 371  
372 372  == Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA ==
373 -
374 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
354 +{{expand title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA" expanded="false"}}
375 375  **Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
376 376  **Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
377 377  **Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
378 378  **Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
379 379  **DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
380 -**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
360 +**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*
381 381  
382 -----
362 +---
383 383  
384 -## **Key Statistics**##
385 -
364 +## **Key Statistics**
386 386  1. **General Observations:**
387 387   - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
388 388   - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
... ... @@ -395,10 +395,9 @@
395 395   - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
396 396   - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
397 397  
398 -----
377 +---
399 399  
400 -## **Findings**##
401 -
379 +## **Findings**
402 402  1. **Primary Observations:**
403 403   - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
404 404   - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
... ... @@ -412,10 +412,9 @@
412 412   - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
413 413   - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
414 414  
415 -----
393 +---
416 416  
417 -## **Critique and Observations**##
418 -
395 +## **Critique and Observations**
419 419  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
420 420   - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
421 421   - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
... ... @@ -428,47 +428,44 @@
428 428   - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
429 429   - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
430 430  
431 -----
408 +---
432 432  
433 433  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
434 434  - Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
435 435  - Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
436 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
413 +- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.
437 437  
438 -----
415 +---
439 439  
440 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
441 -
417 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
442 442  1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
443 443  2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
444 444  3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
445 445  
446 -----
422 +---
447 447  
448 448  ## **Summary of Research Study**
449 -This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
425 +This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.
450 450  
451 -----
427 +---
452 452  
453 453  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
454 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
430 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]
431 +
455 455  {{/expand}}
456 456  
457 -
458 458  == Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age ==
459 -
460 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
435 +{{expand title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age" expanded="false"}}
461 461  **Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
462 462  **Date of Publication:** *2013*
463 463  **Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
464 464  **Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
465 465  **DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
466 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
441 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
467 467  
468 -----
443 +---
469 469  
470 -## **Key Statistics**##
471 -
445 +## **Key Statistics**
472 472  1. **General Observations:**
473 473   - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
474 474   - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
... ... @@ -481,10 +481,9 @@
481 481   - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
482 482   - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
483 483  
484 -----
458 +---
485 485  
486 -## **Findings**##
487 -
460 +## **Findings**
488 488  1. **Primary Observations:**
489 489   - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
490 490   - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
... ... @@ -497,10 +497,9 @@
497 497   - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
498 498   - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
499 499  
500 -----
473 +---
501 501  
502 -## **Critique and Observations**##
503 -
475 +## **Critique and Observations**
504 504  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
505 505   - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
506 506   - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
... ... @@ -513,49 +513,46 @@
513 513   - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
514 514   - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
515 515  
516 -----
488 +---
517 517  
518 518  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
519 519  - Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
520 520  - Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
521 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
493 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
522 522  
523 -----
495 +---
524 524  
525 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
526 -
497 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
527 527  1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
528 528  2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
529 529  3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
530 530  
531 -----
502 +---
532 532  
533 533  ## **Summary of Research Study**
534 -This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
505 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.
535 535  
536 536  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
537 537  
538 -----
509 +---
539 539  
540 540  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
541 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
512 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
513 +
542 542  {{/expand}}
543 543  
544 -
545 545  == Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications ==
546 -
547 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
517 +{{expand title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications" expanded="false"}}
548 548  **Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
549 549  **Date of Publication:** *2010*
550 550  **Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
551 551  **Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
552 552  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
553 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
523 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
554 554  
555 -----
525 +---
556 556  
557 -## **Key Statistics**##
558 -
527 +## **Key Statistics**
559 559  1. **General Observations:**
560 560   - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
561 561   - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
... ... @@ -568,10 +568,9 @@
568 568   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
569 569   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
570 570  
571 -----
540 +---
572 572  
573 -## **Findings**##
574 -
542 +## **Findings**
575 575  1. **Primary Observations:**
576 576   - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
577 577   - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
... ... @@ -584,10 +584,9 @@
584 584   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
585 585   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
586 586  
587 -----
555 +---
588 588  
589 -## **Critique and Observations**##
590 -
557 +## **Critique and Observations**
591 591  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
592 592   - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
593 593   - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
... ... @@ -600,49 +600,47 @@
600 600   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
601 601   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
602 602  
603 -----
570 +---
604 604  
605 605  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
606 606  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
607 607  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
608 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
575 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
609 609  
610 -----
577 +---
611 611  
612 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
613 -
579 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
614 614  1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
615 615  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
616 616  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
617 617  
618 -----
584 +---
619 619  
620 620  ## **Summary of Research Study**
621 -This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
587 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.
622 622  
623 623  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
624 624  
625 -----
591 +---
626 626  
627 627  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
628 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
594 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
595 +
629 629  {{/expand}}
630 630  
631 631  
632 632  == Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media ==
633 -
634 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
600 +{{expand title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media" expanded="false"}}
635 635  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
636 636  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
637 637  **Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
638 638  **Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
639 639  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
640 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
606 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
641 641  
642 -----
608 +---
643 643  
644 -## **Key Statistics**##
645 -
610 +## **Key Statistics**
646 646  1. **General Observations:**
647 647   - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
648 648   - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
... ... @@ -655,10 +655,9 @@
655 655   - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
656 656   - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
657 657  
658 -----
623 +---
659 659  
660 -## **Findings**##
661 -
625 +## **Findings**
662 662  1. **Primary Observations:**
663 663   - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
664 664   - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
... ... @@ -671,10 +671,9 @@
671 671   - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
672 672   - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
673 673  
674 -----
638 +---
675 675  
676 -## **Critique and Observations**##
677 -
640 +## **Critique and Observations**
678 678  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
679 679   - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
680 680   - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
... ... @@ -687,49 +687,47 @@
687 687   - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
688 688   - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
689 689  
690 -----
653 +---
691 691  
692 692  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
693 693  - Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
694 694  - Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
695 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
658 +- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
696 696  
697 -----
660 +---
698 698  
699 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
700 -
662 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
701 701  1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
702 702  2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
703 703  3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
704 704  
705 -----
667 +---
706 706  
707 707  ## **Summary of Research Study**
708 -This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
670 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.
709 709  
710 710  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
711 711  
712 -----
674 +---
713 713  
714 714  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
715 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
677 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
678 +
716 716  {{/expand}}
717 717  
718 718  
719 719  == Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation ==
720 -
721 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
683 +{{expand title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation" expanded="false"}}
722 722  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
723 723  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
724 724  **Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
725 725  **Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
726 726  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
727 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
689 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
728 728  
729 -----
691 +---
730 730  
731 -## **Key Statistics**##
732 -
693 +## **Key Statistics**
733 733  1. **General Observations:**
734 734   - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
735 735   - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
... ... @@ -742,10 +742,9 @@
742 742   - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
743 743   - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
744 744  
745 -----
706 +---
746 746  
747 -## **Findings**##
748 -
708 +## **Findings**
749 749  1. **Primary Observations:**
750 750   - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
751 751   - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
... ... @@ -758,10 +758,9 @@
758 758   - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
759 759   - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
760 760  
761 -----
721 +---
762 762  
763 -## **Critique and Observations**##
764 -
723 +## **Critique and Observations**
765 765  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
766 766   - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
767 767   - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
... ... @@ -774,37 +774,35 @@
774 774   - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
775 775   - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
776 776  
777 -----
736 +---
778 778  
779 779  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
780 780  - Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
781 781  - Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
782 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
741 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
783 783  
784 -----
743 +---
785 785  
786 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
787 -
745 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
788 788  1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
789 789  2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
790 790  3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
791 791  
792 -----
750 +---
793 793  
794 794  ## **Summary of Research Study**
795 -This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.  ##
753 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.
796 796  
797 797  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
798 798  
799 -----
757 +---
800 800  
801 801  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
802 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
760 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
761 +
803 803  {{/expand}}
804 804  
805 -
806 806  == Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding ==
807 -
808 808  {{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
809 809  **Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
810 810  **Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
... ... @@ -811,11 +811,11 @@
811 811  **Author(s):** Smith et al.
812 812  **Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
813 813  **DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
814 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science 
771 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
815 815  
816 816  **Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
817 817  
818 - **Key Statistics**
775 +=== **Key Statistics** ===
819 819  
820 820  1. **General Observations:**
821 821   - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
... ... @@ -825,12 +825,12 @@
825 825   - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
826 826   - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
827 827  
828 - **Findings**
785 +=== **Findings** ===
829 829  
830 830  - Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
831 831  - Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
832 832  
833 - **Relevance to Subproject**
790 +=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
834 834  
835 835  - Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
836 836  - Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
... ... @@ -837,25 +837,22 @@
837 837  {{/expand}}
838 838  
839 839  
840 -----
797 +---
841 841  
842 842  = Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
843 843  
844 -
845 845  == Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018 ==
846 -
847 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
802 +{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}}
848 848  **Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
849 849  **Date of Publication:** *2020*
850 850  **Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
851 851  **Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
852 852  **DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
853 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
808 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*
854 854  
855 -----
810 +---
856 856  
857 -## **Key Statistics**##
858 -
812 +## **Key Statistics**
859 859  1. **General Observations:**
860 860   - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
861 861   - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
... ... @@ -868,10 +868,9 @@
868 868   - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
869 869   - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
870 870  
871 -----
825 +---
872 872  
873 -## **Findings**##
874 -
827 +## **Findings**
875 875  1. **Primary Observations:**
876 876   - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
877 877   - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
... ... @@ -884,10 +884,9 @@
884 884   - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
885 885   - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
886 886  
887 -----
840 +---
888 888  
889 -## **Critique and Observations**##
890 -
842 +## **Critique and Observations**
891 891  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
892 892   - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
893 893   - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
... ... @@ -900,27 +900,26 @@
900 900   - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
901 901   - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
902 902  
903 -----
855 +---
904 904  
905 905  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
906 906  - Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
907 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
859 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
908 908  
909 -----
861 +---
910 910  
911 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
912 -
863 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
913 913  1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
914 914  2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
915 915  
916 -----
867 +---
917 917  
918 918  ## **Summary of Research Study**
919 -This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.  ##
870 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.
920 920  
921 921  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
922 922  
923 -----
874 +---
924 924  
925 925  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
926 926  {{velocity}}
... ... @@ -930,24 +930,24 @@
930 930  [[Download>>attach:$filename]]
931 931  #else
932 932  {{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
933 -#end {{/velocity}}##
884 +#end
885 +{{/velocity}}
886 +
934 934  {{/expand}}
935 935  
936 936  
937 937  == Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ==
938 -
939 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
891 +{{expand title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" expanded="false"}}
940 940  **Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
941 941  **Date of Publication:** *2012*
942 942  **Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
943 943  **Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
944 944  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
945 -**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
897 +**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*
946 946  
947 -----
899 +---
948 948  
949 -## **Key Statistics**##
950 -
901 +## **Key Statistics**
951 951  1. **General Observations:**
952 952   - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
953 953   - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
... ... @@ -962,10 +962,9 @@
962 962   - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
963 963   - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
964 964  
965 -----
916 +---
966 966  
967 -## **Findings**##
968 -
918 +## **Findings**
969 969  1. **Primary Observations:**
970 970   - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
971 971   - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
... ... @@ -978,10 +978,9 @@
978 978   - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
979 979   - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
980 980  
981 -----
931 +---
982 982  
983 -## **Critique and Observations**##
984 -
933 +## **Critique and Observations**
985 985  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
986 986   - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
987 987   - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
... ... @@ -994,47 +994,45 @@
994 994   - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
995 995   - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
996 996  
997 -----
946 +---
998 998  
999 999  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1000 1000  - Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
1001 1001  - Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
1002 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
951 +- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.
1003 1003  
1004 -----
953 +---
1005 1005  
1006 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1007 -
955 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1008 1008  1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
1009 1009  2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
1010 1010  3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
1011 1011  
1012 -----
960 +---
1013 1013  
1014 1014  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1015 -This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
963 +This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.
1016 1016  
1017 -----
965 +---
1018 1018  
1019 1019  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1020 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
968 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]
969 +
1021 1021  {{/expand}}
1022 1022  
1023 1023  
1024 1024  == Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness ==
1025 -
1026 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
974 +{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}}
1027 1027  **Source:** *Current Psychology*
1028 1028  **Date of Publication:** *2024*
1029 1029  **Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
1030 1030  **Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
1031 1031  **DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
1032 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
980 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
1033 1033  
1034 -----
982 +---
1035 1035  
1036 -## **Key Statistics**##
1037 -
984 +## **Key Statistics**
1038 1038  1. **General Observations:**
1039 1039   - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
1040 1040   - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
... ... @@ -1047,10 +1047,9 @@
1047 1047   - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
1048 1048   - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
1049 1049  
1050 -----
997 +---
1051 1051  
1052 -## **Findings**##
1053 -
999 +## **Findings**
1054 1054  1. **Primary Observations:**
1055 1055   - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
1056 1056   - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
... ... @@ -1063,10 +1063,9 @@
1063 1063   - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
1064 1064   - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
1065 1065  
1066 -----
1012 +---
1067 1067  
1068 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1069 -
1014 +## **Critique and Observations**
1070 1070  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1071 1071   - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
1072 1072   - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
... ... @@ -1079,52 +1079,131 @@
1079 1079   - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
1080 1080   - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
1081 1081  
1082 -----
1027 +---
1083 1083  
1084 1084  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1085 1085  - Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
1086 1086  - Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
1087 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
1032 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
1088 1088  
1089 -----
1034 +---
1090 1090  
1091 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1092 -
1036 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1093 1093  1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
1094 1094  2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
1095 1095  3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
1096 1096  
1097 -----
1041 +---
1098 1098  
1099 1099  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1100 -This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
1044 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.
1101 1101  
1102 1102  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1103 1103  
1104 -----
1048 +---
1105 1105  
1106 1106  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1107 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
1051 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
1052 +
1108 1108  {{/expand}}
1109 1109  
1110 1110  
1111 1111  = Crime and Substance Abuse =
1112 1112  
1058 +== Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1059 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1060 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1061 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1062 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1063 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1064 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1065 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1113 1113  
1114 -== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1067 +---
1115 1115  
1116 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1069 +## **Key Statistics**
1070 +1. **General Observations:**
1071 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1072 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1073 +
1074 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1075 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1076 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1077 +
1078 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1079 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1080 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1081 +
1082 +---
1083 +
1084 +## **Findings**
1085 +1. **Primary Observations:**
1086 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1087 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1088 +
1089 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1090 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1091 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1092 +
1093 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1094 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1095 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1096 +
1097 +---
1098 +
1099 +## **Critique and Observations**
1100 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1101 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1102 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1103 +
1104 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1105 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1106 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1107 +
1108 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1109 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1110 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1111 +
1112 +---
1113 +
1114 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1115 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1116 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1117 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1118 +
1119 +---
1120 +
1121 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1122 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1123 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1124 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1125 +
1126 +---
1127 +
1128 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1129 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1130 +
1131 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1132 +
1133 +---
1134 +
1135 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1136 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1137 +
1138 +{{/expand}}
1139 +
1140 +== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1141 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1117 1117  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1118 1118  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
1119 1119  **Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1120 1120  **Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1121 1121  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1122 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1147 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1123 1123  
1124 -----
1149 +---
1125 1125  
1126 -## **Key Statistics**##
1127 -
1151 +## **Key Statistics**
1128 1128  1. **General Observations:**
1129 1129   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1130 1130   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -1137,10 +1137,9 @@
1137 1137   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1138 1138   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1139 1139  
1140 -----
1164 +---
1141 1141  
1142 -## **Findings**##
1143 -
1166 +## **Findings**
1144 1144  1. **Primary Observations:**
1145 1145   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1146 1146   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -1153,10 +1153,9 @@
1153 1153   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1154 1154   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1155 1155  
1156 -----
1179 +---
1157 1157  
1158 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1159 -
1181 +## **Critique and Observations**
1160 1160  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1161 1161   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1162 1162   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1169,49 +1169,46 @@
1169 1169   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1170 1170   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1171 1171  
1172 -----
1194 +---
1173 1173  
1174 1174  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1175 1175  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1176 1176  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1177 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1199 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1178 1178  
1179 -----
1201 +---
1180 1180  
1181 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1182 -
1203 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1183 1183  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1184 1184  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1185 1185  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1186 1186  
1187 -----
1208 +---
1188 1188  
1189 1189  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1190 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1211 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1191 1191  
1192 1192  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1193 1193  
1194 -----
1215 +---
1195 1195  
1196 1196  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1197 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1218 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1219 +
1198 1198  {{/expand}}
1199 1199  
1200 -
1201 1201  == Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1202 -
1203 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1223 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1204 1204  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1205 1205  **Date of Publication:** *2003*
1206 1206  **Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1207 1207  **Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1208 1208  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1209 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1229 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1210 1210  
1211 -----
1231 +---
1212 1212  
1213 -## **Key Statistics**##
1214 -
1233 +## **Key Statistics**
1215 1215  1. **General Observations:**
1216 1216   - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1217 1217   - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
... ... @@ -1224,10 +1224,9 @@
1224 1224   - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1225 1225   - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1226 1226  
1227 -----
1246 +---
1228 1228  
1229 -## **Findings**##
1230 -
1248 +## **Findings**
1231 1231  1. **Primary Observations:**
1232 1232   - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1233 1233   - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
... ... @@ -1240,10 +1240,9 @@
1240 1240   - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1241 1241   - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1242 1242  
1243 -----
1261 +---
1244 1244  
1245 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1246 -
1263 +## **Critique and Observations**
1247 1247  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1248 1248   - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1249 1249   - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
... ... @@ -1256,49 +1256,47 @@
1256 1256   - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1257 1257   - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1258 1258  
1259 -----
1276 +---
1260 1260  
1261 1261  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1262 1262  - Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1263 1263  - Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1264 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1281 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1265 1265  
1266 -----
1283 +---
1267 1267  
1268 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1269 -
1285 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1270 1270  1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1271 1271  2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1272 1272  3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1273 1273  
1274 -----
1290 +---
1275 1275  
1276 1276  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1277 -This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
1293 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1278 1278  
1279 1279  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1280 1280  
1281 -----
1297 +---
1282 1282  
1283 1283  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1284 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
1300 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1301 +
1285 1285  {{/expand}}
1286 1286  
1287 1287  
1288 1288  == Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1289 -
1290 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1306 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1291 1291  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1292 1292  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
1293 1293  **Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1294 1294  **Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1295 1295  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1296 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1312 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1297 1297  
1298 -----
1314 +---
1299 1299  
1300 -## **Key Statistics**##
1301 -
1316 +## **Key Statistics**
1302 1302  1. **General Observations:**
1303 1303   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1304 1304   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -1311,10 +1311,9 @@
1311 1311   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1312 1312   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1313 1313  
1314 -----
1329 +---
1315 1315  
1316 -## **Findings**##
1317 -
1331 +## **Findings**
1318 1318  1. **Primary Observations:**
1319 1319   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1320 1320   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -1327,10 +1327,9 @@
1327 1327   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1328 1328   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1329 1329  
1330 -----
1344 +---
1331 1331  
1332 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1333 -
1346 +## **Critique and Observations**
1334 1334  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1335 1335   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1336 1336   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1343,39 +1343,36 @@
1343 1343   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1344 1344   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1345 1345  
1346 -----
1359 +---
1347 1347  
1348 1348  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1349 1349  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1350 1350  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1351 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1364 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1352 1352  
1353 -----
1366 +---
1354 1354  
1355 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1356 -
1368 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1357 1357  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1358 1358  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1359 1359  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1360 1360  
1361 -----
1373 +---
1362 1362  
1363 1363  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1364 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1376 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1365 1365  
1366 1366  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1367 1367  
1368 -----
1380 +---
1369 1369  
1370 1370  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1371 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1383 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1384 +
1372 1372  {{/expand}}
1373 1373  
1374 -
1375 1375  == Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults ==
1376 -
1377 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1378 - Source: Addictive Behaviors
1388 +{{expand title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" expanded="false"}} Source: Addictive Behaviors
1379 1379  Date of Publication: 2016
1380 1380  Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
1381 1381  Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
... ... @@ -1436,23 +1436,22 @@
1436 1436  
1437 1437  📄 Download Full Study
1438 1438  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
1449 +
1439 1439  {{/expand}}
1440 1440  
1441 1441  
1442 1442  == Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time? ==
1443 -
1444 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1454 +{{expand title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?" expanded="false"}}
1445 1445  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1446 1446  **Date of Publication:** *2014*
1447 1447  **Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1448 1448  **Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1449 1449  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1450 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1460 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
1451 1451  
1452 -----
1462 +---
1453 1453  
1454 -## **Key Statistics**##
1455 -
1464 +## **Key Statistics**
1456 1456  1. **General Observations:**
1457 1457   - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1458 1458   - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
... ... @@ -1465,10 +1465,9 @@
1465 1465   - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1466 1466   - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1467 1467  
1468 -----
1477 +---
1469 1469  
1470 -## **Findings**##
1471 -
1479 +## **Findings**
1472 1472  1. **Primary Observations:**
1473 1473   - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1474 1474   - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
... ... @@ -1481,10 +1481,9 @@
1481 1481   - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1482 1482   - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1483 1483  
1484 -----
1492 +---
1485 1485  
1486 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1487 -
1494 +## **Critique and Observations**
1488 1488  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1489 1489   - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1490 1490   - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
... ... @@ -1497,51 +1497,52 @@
1497 1497   - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1498 1498   - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1499 1499  
1500 -----
1507 +---
1501 1501  
1502 1502  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1503 1503  - Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1504 1504  - Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1505 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1512 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
1506 1506  
1507 -----
1514 +---
1508 1508  
1509 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1510 -
1516 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1511 1511  1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1512 1512  2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1513 1513  3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1514 1514  
1515 -----
1521 +---
1516 1516  
1517 1517  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1518 -This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.  ##
1524 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.
1519 1519  
1520 1520  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1521 1521  
1522 -----
1528 +---
1523 1523  
1524 1524  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1525 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
1531 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
1532 +
1526 1526  {{/expand}}
1527 1527  
1528 1528  
1529 -= Whiteness & White Guilt =
1530 1530  
1531 -== Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports ==
1532 1532  
1533 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1538 +
1539 += Whiteness =
1540 +
1541 +== Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports ==
1542 +{{expand title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports" expanded="false"}}
1534 1534  **Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1535 1535  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
1536 1536  **Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1537 1537  **Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1538 1538  **DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1539 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1548 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
1540 1540  
1541 -----
1550 +---
1542 1542  
1543 -## **Key Statistics**##
1544 -
1552 +## **Key Statistics**
1545 1545  1. **General Observations:**
1546 1546   - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1547 1547   - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
... ... @@ -1554,10 +1554,9 @@
1554 1554   - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1555 1555   - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1556 1556  
1557 -----
1565 +---
1558 1558  
1559 -## **Findings**##
1560 -
1567 +## **Findings**
1561 1561  1. **Primary Observations:**
1562 1562   - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1563 1563   - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
... ... @@ -1570,10 +1570,9 @@
1570 1570   - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1571 1571   - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1572 1572  
1573 -----
1580 +---
1574 1574  
1575 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1576 -
1582 +## **Critique and Observations**
1577 1577  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1578 1578   - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1579 1579   - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
... ... @@ -1586,49 +1586,52 @@
1586 1586   - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1587 1587   - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1588 1588  
1589 -----
1595 +---
1590 1590  
1591 1591  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1592 1592  - Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1593 1593  - Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1594 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1600 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
1595 1595  
1596 -----
1602 +---
1597 1597  
1598 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1599 -
1604 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1600 1600  1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1601 1601  2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1602 1602  3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1603 1603  
1604 -----
1609 +---
1605 1605  
1606 1606  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1607 -This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
1612 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.
1608 1608  
1609 1609  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1610 1610  
1611 -----
1616 +---
1612 1612  
1613 1613  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1614 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
1619 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
1620 +
1615 1615  {{/expand}}
1616 1616  
1617 1617  
1618 -== Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations ==
1619 1619  
1620 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1625 +
1626 +
1627 += White Guilt =
1628 +
1629 +== Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations ==
1630 +{{expand title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations" expanded="false"}}
1621 1621  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1622 1622  **Date of Publication:** *2016*
1623 1623  **Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1624 1624  **Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1625 1625  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1626 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1636 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1627 1627  
1628 -----
1638 +---
1629 1629  
1630 -## **Key Statistics**##
1631 -
1640 +## **Key Statistics**
1632 1632  1. **General Observations:**
1633 1633   - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1634 1634   - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
... ... @@ -1641,10 +1641,9 @@
1641 1641   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1642 1642   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1643 1643  
1644 -----
1653 +---
1645 1645  
1646 -## **Findings**##
1647 -
1655 +## **Findings**
1648 1648  1. **Primary Observations:**
1649 1649   - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1650 1650   - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
... ... @@ -1657,10 +1657,9 @@
1657 1657   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1658 1658   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1659 1659  
1660 -----
1668 +---
1661 1661  
1662 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1663 -
1670 +## **Critique and Observations**
1664 1664  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1665 1665   - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1666 1666   - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
... ... @@ -1673,49 +1673,47 @@
1673 1673   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1674 1674   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1675 1675  
1676 -----
1683 +---
1677 1677  
1678 1678  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1679 1679  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1680 1680  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1681 -- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1688 +- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1682 1682  
1683 -----
1690 +---
1684 1684  
1685 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1686 -
1692 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1687 1687  1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1688 1688  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1689 1689  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1690 1690  
1691 -----
1697 +---
1692 1692  
1693 1693  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1694 -This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
1700 +This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.
1695 1695  
1696 1696  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1697 1697  
1698 -----
1704 +---
1699 1699  
1700 1700  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1701 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
1707 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1708 +
1702 1702  {{/expand}}
1703 1703  
1704 1704  
1705 1705  == Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans ==
1706 -
1707 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1713 +{{expand title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans" expanded="false"}}
1708 1708  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1709 1709  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
1710 1710  **Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1711 1711  **Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1712 1712  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1713 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1719 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1714 1714  
1715 -----
1721 +---
1716 1716  
1717 -## **Key Statistics**##
1718 -
1723 +## **Key Statistics**
1719 1719  1. **General Observations:**
1720 1720   - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1721 1721   - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
... ... @@ -1728,10 +1728,9 @@
1728 1728   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1729 1729   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1730 1730  
1731 -----
1736 +---
1732 1732  
1733 -## **Findings**##
1734 -
1738 +## **Findings**
1735 1735  1. **Primary Observations:**
1736 1736   - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1737 1737   - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
... ... @@ -1744,10 +1744,9 @@
1744 1744   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1745 1745   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1746 1746  
1747 -----
1751 +---
1748 1748  
1749 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1750 -
1753 +## **Critique and Observations**
1751 1751  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1752 1752   - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1753 1753   - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
... ... @@ -1760,49 +1760,46 @@
1760 1760   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1761 1761   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1762 1762  
1763 -----
1766 +---
1764 1764  
1765 1765  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1766 1766  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1767 1767  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1768 -- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1771 +- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1769 1769  
1770 -----
1773 +---
1771 1771  
1772 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1773 -
1775 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1774 1774  1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1775 1775  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1776 1776  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1777 1777  
1778 -----
1780 +---
1779 1779  
1780 1780  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1781 -This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
1783 +This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.
1782 1782  
1783 1783  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1784 1784  
1785 -----
1787 +---
1786 1786  
1787 1787  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1788 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
1790 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1791 +
1789 1789  {{/expand}}
1790 1790  
1791 -
1792 1792  == Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities? ==
1793 -
1794 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1795 +{{expand title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?" expanded="false"}}
1795 1795  **Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1796 1796  **Date of Publication:** *2023*
1797 1797  **Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1798 1798  **Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1799 1799  **DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1800 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1801 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1801 1801  
1802 -----
1803 +---
1803 1803  
1804 -## **Key Statistics**##
1805 -
1805 +## **Key Statistics**
1806 1806  1. **General Observations:**
1807 1807   - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1808 1808   - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
... ... @@ -1815,10 +1815,9 @@
1815 1815   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1816 1816   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1817 1817  
1818 -----
1818 +---
1819 1819  
1820 -## **Findings**##
1821 -
1820 +## **Findings**
1822 1822  1. **Primary Observations:**
1823 1823   - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1824 1824   - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
... ... @@ -1831,10 +1831,9 @@
1831 1831   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1832 1832   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1833 1833  
1834 -----
1833 +---
1835 1835  
1836 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1837 -
1835 +## **Critique and Observations**
1838 1838  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1839 1839   - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1840 1840   - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
... ... @@ -1847,52 +1847,50 @@
1847 1847   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1848 1848   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1849 1849  
1850 -----
1848 +---
1851 1851  
1852 1852  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1853 1853  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1854 1854  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1855 -- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
1853 +- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1856 1856  
1857 -----
1855 +---
1858 1858  
1859 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1860 -
1857 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1861 1861  1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1862 1862  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1863 1863  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1864 1864  
1865 -----
1862 +---
1866 1866  
1867 1867  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1868 -This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
1865 +This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.
1869 1869  
1870 1870  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1871 1871  
1872 -----
1869 +---
1873 1873  
1874 1874  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1875 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
1872 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1873 +
1876 1876  {{/expand}}
1877 1877  
1878 1878  
1877 +
1879 1879  = Media =
1880 1880  
1881 -
1882 1882  == Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic ==
1883 -
1884 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"}}
1881 +{{expand title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict" expanded="false"}}
1885 1885  **Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1886 1886  **Date of Publication:** *2021*
1887 1887  **Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1888 1888  **Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1889 1889  **DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1890 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1887 +**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*
1891 1891  
1892 -----
1889 +---
1893 1893  
1894 -## **Key Statistics**##
1895 -
1891 +## **Key Statistics**
1896 1896  1. **General Observations:**
1897 1897   - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1898 1898   - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
... ... @@ -1905,10 +1905,9 @@
1905 1905   - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1906 1906   - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1907 1907  
1908 -----
1904 +---
1909 1909  
1910 -## **Findings**##
1911 -
1906 +## **Findings**
1912 1912  1. **Primary Observations:**
1913 1913   - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1914 1914   - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
... ... @@ -1921,10 +1921,9 @@
1921 1921   - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1922 1922   - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1923 1923  
1924 -----
1919 +---
1925 1925  
1926 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1927 -
1921 +## **Critique and Observations**
1928 1928  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1929 1929   - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1930 1930   - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
... ... @@ -1937,47 +1937,45 @@
1937 1937   - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1938 1938   - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1939 1939  
1940 -----
1934 +---
1941 1941  
1942 1942  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1943 1943  - Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
1944 1944  - Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1945 -- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
1939 +- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
1946 1946  
1947 -----
1941 +---
1948 1948  
1949 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1950 -
1943 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1951 1951  1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
1952 1952  2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1953 1953  3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1954 1954  
1955 -----
1948 +---
1956 1956  
1957 1957  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1958 -This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
1951 +This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.
1959 1959  
1960 -----
1953 +---
1961 1961  
1962 1962  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1963 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
1956 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
1957 +
1964 1964  {{/expand}}
1965 1965  
1966 1966  
1967 1967  == Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions ==
1968 -
1969 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
1962 +{{expand title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions" expanded="false"}}
1970 1970  **Source:** *Politics & Policy*
1971 1971  **Date of Publication:** *2007*
1972 1972  **Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
1973 1973  **Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
1974 1974  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
1975 -**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
1968 +**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*
1976 1976  
1977 -----
1970 +---
1978 1978  
1979 -## **Key Statistics**##
1980 -
1972 +## **Key Statistics**
1981 1981  1. **General Observations:**
1982 1982   - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
1983 1983   - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
... ... @@ -1990,10 +1990,9 @@
1990 1990   - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
1991 1991   - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
1992 1992  
1993 -----
1985 +---
1994 1994  
1995 -## **Findings**##
1996 -
1987 +## **Findings**
1997 1997  1. **Primary Observations:**
1998 1998   - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
1999 1999   - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
... ... @@ -2006,10 +2006,9 @@
2006 2006   - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
2007 2007   - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
2008 2008  
2009 -----
2000 +---
2010 2010  
2011 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2012 -
2002 +## **Critique and Observations**
2013 2013  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2014 2014   - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
2015 2015   - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
... ... @@ -2022,47 +2022,44 @@
2022 2022   - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
2023 2023   - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
2024 2024  
2025 -----
2015 +---
2026 2026  
2027 2027  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2028 2028  - Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
2029 2029  - Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
2030 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
2020 +- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.
2031 2031  
2032 -----
2022 +---
2033 2033  
2034 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2035 -
2024 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2036 2036  1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
2037 2037  2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
2038 2038  3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
2039 2039  
2040 -----
2029 +---
2041 2041  
2042 2042  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2043 -This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
2032 +This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.
2044 2044  
2045 -----
2034 +---
2046 2046  
2047 2047  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2048 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
2037 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]
2038 +
2049 2049  {{/expand}}
2050 2050  
2051 -
2052 2052  == Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion ==
2053 -
2054 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
2042 +{{expand title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion" expanded="false"}}
2055 2055  **Source:** *Journal of Communication*
2056 2056  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
2057 2057  **Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
2058 2058  **Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
2059 2059  **DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2060 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
2048 +**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*
2061 2061  
2062 -----
2050 +---
2063 2063  
2064 -## **Key Statistics**##
2065 -
2052 +## **Key Statistics**
2066 2066  1. **General Observations:**
2067 2067   - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
2068 2068   - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
... ... @@ -2075,10 +2075,9 @@
2075 2075   - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
2076 2076   - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
2077 2077  
2078 -----
2065 +---
2079 2079  
2080 -## **Findings**##
2081 -
2067 +## **Findings**
2082 2082  1. **Primary Observations:**
2083 2083   - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
2084 2084   - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
... ... @@ -2091,10 +2091,9 @@
2091 2091   - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
2092 2092   - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
2093 2093  
2094 -----
2080 +---
2095 2095  
2096 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2097 -
2082 +## **Critique and Observations**
2098 2098  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2099 2099   - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
2100 2100   - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
... ... @@ -2107,28 +2107,31 @@
2107 2107   - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
2108 2108   - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
2109 2109  
2110 -----
2095 +---
2111 2111  
2112 2112  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2113 2113  - Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
2114 2114  - Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
2115 -- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
2100 +- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
2116 2116  
2117 -----
2102 +---
2118 2118  
2119 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2120 -
2104 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2121 2121  1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
2122 2122  2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
2123 2123  3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
2124 2124  
2125 -----
2109 +---
2126 2126  
2127 2127  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2128 -This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
2112 +This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.
2129 2129  
2130 -----
2114 +---
2131 2131  
2132 2132  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2133 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
2117 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
2118 +
2134 2134  {{/expand}}
2120 +
2121 +
2122 +