0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 81.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 06:49
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 80.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 06:49
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
12 12  - If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
13 13  
14 14  
15 -{{toc/}}
16 16  
17 17  
18 18  == Research Studies Repository ==
... ... @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
31 31  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
32 32  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
33 33  
34 -----
33 +-----
35 35  
36 36  ## **Key Statistics**##
37 37  
... ... @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
47 47   - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
48 48   - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
49 49  
50 -----
49 +-----
51 51  
52 52  ## **Findings**##
53 53  
... ... @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
63 63   - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
64 64   - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
65 65  
66 -----
65 +-----
67 67  
68 68  ## **Critique and Observations**##
69 69  
... ... @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
79 79   - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
80 80   - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
81 81  
82 -----
81 +-----
83 83  
84 84  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
85 85  - Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
... ... @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
86 86  - Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
87 87  - Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
88 88  
89 -----
88 +-----
90 90  
91 91  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
92 92  
... ... @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
94 94  2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
95 95  3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
96 96  
97 -----
96 +-----
98 98  
99 99  ## **Summary of Research Study**
100 100  This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
... ... @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
101 101  
102 102  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
103 103  
104 -----
103 +-----
105 105  
106 106  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
107 107  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
118 118  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
119 119  **Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
120 120  
121 -----
120 +-----
122 122  
123 123  ## **Key Statistics**##
124 124  
... ... @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@
134 134   - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
135 135   - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
136 136  
137 -----
136 +-----
138 138  
139 139  ## **Findings**##
140 140  
... ... @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@
150 150   - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
151 151   - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
152 152  
153 -----
152 +-----
154 154  
155 155  ## **Critique and Observations**##
156 156  
... ... @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@
166 166   - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
167 167   - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
168 168  
169 -----
168 +-----
170 170  
171 171  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
172 172  - Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
... ... @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@
173 173  - Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
174 174  - Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
175 175  
176 -----
175 +-----
177 177  
178 178  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
179 179  
... ... @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@
181 181  2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
182 182  3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
183 183  
184 -----
183 +-----
185 185  
186 186  ## **Summary of Research Study**
187 187  This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
... ... @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@
188 188  
189 189  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
190 190  
191 -----
190 +-----
192 192  
193 193  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
194 194  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
205 205  **DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
206 206  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
207 207  
208 -----
207 +-----
209 209  
210 210  ## **Key Statistics**##
211 211  
... ... @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@
221 221   - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
222 222   - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
223 223  
224 -----
223 +-----
225 225  
226 226  ## **Findings**##
227 227  
... ... @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@
237 237   - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
238 238   - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
239 239  
240 -----
239 +-----
241 241  
242 242  ## **Critique and Observations**##
243 243  
... ... @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@
253 253   - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
254 254   - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
255 255  
256 -----
255 +-----
257 257  
258 258  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
259 259  - Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
... ... @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@
260 260  - Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
261 261  - Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
262 262  
263 -----
262 +-----
264 264  
265 265  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
266 266  
... ... @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@
268 268  2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
269 269  3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
270 270  
271 -----
270 +-----
272 272  
273 273  ## **Summary of Research Study**
274 274  This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
... ... @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@
275 275  
276 276  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
277 277  
278 -----
277 +-----
279 279  
280 280  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
281 281  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@
292 292  **DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
293 293  **Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
294 294  
295 -----
294 +-----
296 296  
297 297  ## **Key Statistics**##
298 298  
... ... @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@
308 308   - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
309 309   - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
310 310  
311 -----
310 +-----
312 312  
313 313  ## **Findings**##
314 314  
... ... @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@
324 324   - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
325 325   - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
326 326  
327 -----
326 +-----
328 328  
329 329  ## **Critique and Observations**##
330 330  
... ... @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@
340 340   - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
341 341   - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
342 342  
343 -----
342 +-----
344 344  
345 345  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
346 346  - Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
... ... @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@
347 347  - Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
348 348  - Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
349 349  
350 -----
349 +-----
351 351  
352 352  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
353 353  
... ... @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@
355 355  2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
356 356  3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
357 357  
358 -----
357 +-----
359 359  
360 360  ## **Summary of Research Study**
361 361  This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
... ... @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@
362 362  
363 363  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
364 364  
365 -----
364 +-----
366 366  
367 367  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
368 368  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@
379 379  **DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
380 380  **Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
381 381  
382 -----
381 +-----
383 383  
384 384  ## **Key Statistics**##
385 385  
... ... @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@
395 395   - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
396 396   - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
397 397  
398 -----
397 +-----
399 399  
400 400  ## **Findings**##
401 401  
... ... @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@
412 412   - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
413 413   - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
414 414  
415 -----
414 +-----
416 416  
417 417  ## **Critique and Observations**##
418 418  
... ... @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@
428 428   - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
429 429   - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
430 430  
431 -----
430 +-----
432 432  
433 433  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
434 434  - Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
... ... @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@
435 435  - Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
436 436  - Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
437 437  
438 -----
437 +-----
439 439  
440 440  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
441 441  
... ... @@ -443,12 +443,12 @@
443 443  2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
444 444  3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
445 445  
446 -----
445 +-----
447 447  
448 448  ## **Summary of Research Study**
449 449  This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
450 450  
451 -----
450 +-----
452 452  
453 453  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
454 454  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -465,7 +465,7 @@
465 465  **DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
466 466  **Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
467 467  
468 -----
467 +-----
469 469  
470 470  ## **Key Statistics**##
471 471  
... ... @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@
481 481   - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
482 482   - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
483 483  
484 -----
483 +-----
485 485  
486 486  ## **Findings**##
487 487  
... ... @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@
497 497   - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
498 498   - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
499 499  
500 -----
499 +-----
501 501  
502 502  ## **Critique and Observations**##
503 503  
... ... @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@
513 513   - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
514 514   - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
515 515  
516 -----
515 +-----
517 517  
518 518  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
519 519  - Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
... ... @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@
520 520  - Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
521 521  - Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
522 522  
523 -----
522 +-----
524 524  
525 525  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
526 526  
... ... @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@
528 528  2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
529 529  3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
530 530  
531 -----
530 +-----
532 532  
533 533  ## **Summary of Research Study**
534 534  This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
... ... @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@
535 535  
536 536  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
537 537  
538 -----
537 +-----
539 539  
540 540  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
541 541  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@
552 552  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
553 553  **Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
554 554  
555 -----
554 +-----
556 556  
557 557  ## **Key Statistics**##
558 558  
... ... @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@
568 568   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
569 569   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
570 570  
571 -----
570 +-----
572 572  
573 573  ## **Findings**##
574 574  
... ... @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@
584 584   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
585 585   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
586 586  
587 -----
586 +-----
588 588  
589 589  ## **Critique and Observations**##
590 590  
... ... @@ -600,7 +600,7 @@
600 600   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
601 601   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
602 602  
603 -----
602 +-----
604 604  
605 605  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
606 606  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
... ... @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@
607 607  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
608 608  - Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
609 609  
610 -----
609 +-----
611 611  
612 612  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
613 613  
... ... @@ -615,7 +615,7 @@
615 615  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
616 616  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
617 617  
618 -----
617 +-----
619 619  
620 620  ## **Summary of Research Study**
621 621  This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
... ... @@ -622,7 +622,7 @@
622 622  
623 623  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
624 624  
625 -----
624 +-----
626 626  
627 627  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
628 628  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@
639 639  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
640 640  **Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
641 641  
642 -----
641 +-----
643 643  
644 644  ## **Key Statistics**##
645 645  
... ... @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@
655 655   - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
656 656   - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
657 657  
658 -----
657 +-----
659 659  
660 660  ## **Findings**##
661 661  
... ... @@ -671,7 +671,7 @@
671 671   - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
672 672   - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
673 673  
674 -----
673 +-----
675 675  
676 676  ## **Critique and Observations**##
677 677  
... ... @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@
687 687   - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
688 688   - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
689 689  
690 -----
689 +-----
691 691  
692 692  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
693 693  - Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
... ... @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@
694 694  - Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
695 695  - Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
696 696  
697 -----
696 +-----
698 698  
699 699  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
700 700  
... ... @@ -702,7 +702,7 @@
702 702  2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
703 703  3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
704 704  
705 -----
704 +-----
706 706  
707 707  ## **Summary of Research Study**
708 708  This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
... ... @@ -709,7 +709,7 @@
709 709  
710 710  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
711 711  
712 -----
711 +-----
713 713  
714 714  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
715 715  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -726,7 +726,7 @@
726 726  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
727 727  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
728 728  
729 -----
728 +-----
730 730  
731 731  ## **Key Statistics**##
732 732  
... ... @@ -742,7 +742,7 @@
742 742   - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
743 743   - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
744 744  
745 -----
744 +-----
746 746  
747 747  ## **Findings**##
748 748  
... ... @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@
758 758   - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
759 759   - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
760 760  
761 -----
760 +-----
762 762  
763 763  ## **Critique and Observations**##
764 764  
... ... @@ -774,7 +774,7 @@
774 774   - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
775 775   - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
776 776  
777 -----
776 +-----
778 778  
779 779  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
780 780  - Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
... ... @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@
781 781  - Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
782 782  - Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
783 783  
784 -----
783 +-----
785 785  
786 786  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
787 787  
... ... @@ -789,7 +789,7 @@
789 789  2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
790 790  3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
791 791  
792 -----
791 +-----
793 793  
794 794  ## **Summary of Research Study**
795 795  This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.  ##
... ... @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@
796 796  
797 797  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
798 798  
799 -----
798 +-----
800 800  
801 801  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
802 802  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@
837 837  {{/expand}}
838 838  
839 839  
840 -----
839 +-----
841 841  
842 842  = Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
843 843  
... ... @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@
852 852  **DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
853 853  **Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
854 854  
855 -----
854 +-----
856 856  
857 857  ## **Key Statistics**##
858 858  
... ... @@ -868,7 +868,7 @@
868 868   - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
869 869   - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
870 870  
871 -----
870 +-----
872 872  
873 873  ## **Findings**##
874 874  
... ... @@ -884,7 +884,7 @@
884 884   - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
885 885   - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
886 886  
887 -----
886 +-----
888 888  
889 889  ## **Critique and Observations**##
890 890  
... ... @@ -900,13 +900,13 @@
900 900   - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
901 901   - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
902 902  
903 -----
902 +-----
904 904  
905 905  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
906 906  - Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
907 907  - Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
908 908  
909 -----
908 +-----
910 910  
911 911  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
912 912  
... ... @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@
913 913  1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
914 914  2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
915 915  
916 -----
915 +-----
917 917  
918 918  ## **Summary of Research Study**
919 919  This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.  ##
... ... @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@
920 920  
921 921  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
922 922  
923 -----
922 +-----
924 924  
925 925  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
926 926  {{velocity}}
... ... @@ -944,7 +944,7 @@
944 944  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
945 945  **Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
946 946  
947 -----
946 +-----
948 948  
949 949  ## **Key Statistics**##
950 950  
... ... @@ -962,7 +962,7 @@
962 962   - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
963 963   - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
964 964  
965 -----
964 +-----
966 966  
967 967  ## **Findings**##
968 968  
... ... @@ -978,7 +978,7 @@
978 978   - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
979 979   - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
980 980  
981 -----
980 +-----
982 982  
983 983  ## **Critique and Observations**##
984 984  
... ... @@ -994,7 +994,7 @@
994 994   - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
995 995   - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
996 996  
997 -----
996 +-----
998 998  
999 999  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1000 1000  - Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
... ... @@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@
1001 1001  - Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
1002 1002  - Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
1003 1003  
1004 -----
1003 +-----
1005 1005  
1006 1006  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1007 1007  
... ... @@ -1009,12 +1009,12 @@
1009 1009  2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
1010 1010  3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
1011 1011  
1012 -----
1011 +-----
1013 1013  
1014 1014  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1015 1015  This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
1016 1016  
1017 -----
1016 +-----
1018 1018  
1019 1019  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1020 1020  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@
1031 1031  **DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
1032 1032  **Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
1033 1033  
1034 -----
1033 +-----
1035 1035  
1036 1036  ## **Key Statistics**##
1037 1037  
... ... @@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@
1047 1047   - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
1048 1048   - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
1049 1049  
1050 -----
1049 +-----
1051 1051  
1052 1052  ## **Findings**##
1053 1053  
... ... @@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@
1063 1063   - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
1064 1064   - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
1065 1065  
1066 -----
1065 +-----
1067 1067  
1068 1068  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1069 1069  
... ... @@ -1079,7 +1079,7 @@
1079 1079   - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
1080 1080   - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
1081 1081  
1082 -----
1081 +-----
1083 1083  
1084 1084  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1085 1085  - Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
... ... @@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@
1086 1086  - Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
1087 1087  - Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
1088 1088  
1089 -----
1088 +-----
1090 1090  
1091 1091  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1092 1092  
... ... @@ -1094,7 +1094,7 @@
1094 1094  2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
1095 1095  3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
1096 1096  
1097 -----
1096 +-----
1098 1098  
1099 1099  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1100 1100  This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
... ... @@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@
1101 1101  
1102 1102  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1103 1103  
1104 -----
1103 +-----
1105 1105  
1106 1106  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1107 1107  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@
1121 1121  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1122 1122  **Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1123 1123  
1124 -----
1123 +-----
1125 1125  
1126 1126  ## **Key Statistics**##
1127 1127  
... ... @@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@
1137 1137   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1138 1138   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1139 1139  
1140 -----
1139 +-----
1141 1141  
1142 1142  ## **Findings**##
1143 1143  
... ... @@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@
1153 1153   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1154 1154   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1155 1155  
1156 -----
1155 +-----
1157 1157  
1158 1158  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1159 1159  
... ... @@ -1169,7 +1169,7 @@
1169 1169   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1170 1170   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1171 1171  
1172 -----
1171 +-----
1173 1173  
1174 1174  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1175 1175  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
... ... @@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@
1176 1176  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1177 1177  - Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1178 1178  
1179 -----
1178 +-----
1180 1180  
1181 1181  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1182 1182  
... ... @@ -1184,7 +1184,7 @@
1184 1184  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1185 1185  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1186 1186  
1187 -----
1186 +-----
1188 1188  
1189 1189  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1190 1190  This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
... ... @@ -1191,7 +1191,7 @@
1191 1191  
1192 1192  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1193 1193  
1194 -----
1193 +-----
1195 1195  
1196 1196  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1197 1197  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@
1208 1208  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1209 1209  **Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1210 1210  
1211 -----
1210 +-----
1212 1212  
1213 1213  ## **Key Statistics**##
1214 1214  
... ... @@ -1224,7 +1224,7 @@
1224 1224   - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1225 1225   - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1226 1226  
1227 -----
1226 +-----
1228 1228  
1229 1229  ## **Findings**##
1230 1230  
... ... @@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@
1240 1240   - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1241 1241   - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1242 1242  
1243 -----
1242 +-----
1244 1244  
1245 1245  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1246 1246  
... ... @@ -1256,7 +1256,7 @@
1256 1256   - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1257 1257   - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1258 1258  
1259 -----
1258 +-----
1260 1260  
1261 1261  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1262 1262  - Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
... ... @@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@
1263 1263  - Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1264 1264  - Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1265 1265  
1266 -----
1265 +-----
1267 1267  
1268 1268  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1269 1269  
... ... @@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@
1271 1271  2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1272 1272  3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1273 1273  
1274 -----
1273 +-----
1275 1275  
1276 1276  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1277 1277  This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
... ... @@ -1278,7 +1278,7 @@
1278 1278  
1279 1279  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1280 1280  
1281 -----
1280 +-----
1282 1282  
1283 1283  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1284 1284  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1295,7 +1295,7 @@
1295 1295  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1296 1296  **Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1297 1297  
1298 -----
1297 +-----
1299 1299  
1300 1300  ## **Key Statistics**##
1301 1301  
... ... @@ -1311,7 +1311,7 @@
1311 1311   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1312 1312   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1313 1313  
1314 -----
1313 +-----
1315 1315  
1316 1316  ## **Findings**##
1317 1317  
... ... @@ -1327,7 +1327,7 @@
1327 1327   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1328 1328   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1329 1329  
1330 -----
1329 +-----
1331 1331  
1332 1332  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1333 1333  
... ... @@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@
1343 1343   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1344 1344   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1345 1345  
1346 -----
1345 +-----
1347 1347  
1348 1348  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1349 1349  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
... ... @@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@
1350 1350  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1351 1351  - Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1352 1352  
1353 -----
1352 +-----
1354 1354  
1355 1355  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1356 1356  
... ... @@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@
1358 1358  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1359 1359  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1360 1360  
1361 -----
1360 +-----
1362 1362  
1363 1363  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1364 1364  This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
... ... @@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@
1365 1365  
1366 1366  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1367 1367  
1368 -----
1367 +-----
1369 1369  
1370 1370  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1371 1371  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1449,7 +1449,7 @@
1449 1449  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1450 1450  **Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1451 1451  
1452 -----
1451 +-----
1453 1453  
1454 1454  ## **Key Statistics**##
1455 1455  
... ... @@ -1465,7 +1465,7 @@
1465 1465   - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1466 1466   - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1467 1467  
1468 -----
1467 +-----
1469 1469  
1470 1470  ## **Findings**##
1471 1471  
... ... @@ -1481,7 +1481,7 @@
1481 1481   - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1482 1482   - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1483 1483  
1484 -----
1483 +-----
1485 1485  
1486 1486  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1487 1487  
... ... @@ -1497,7 +1497,7 @@
1497 1497   - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1498 1498   - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1499 1499  
1500 -----
1499 +-----
1501 1501  
1502 1502  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1503 1503  - Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
... ... @@ -1504,7 +1504,7 @@
1504 1504  - Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1505 1505  - Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1506 1506  
1507 -----
1506 +-----
1508 1508  
1509 1509  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1510 1510  
... ... @@ -1512,7 +1512,7 @@
1512 1512  2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1513 1513  3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1514 1514  
1515 -----
1514 +-----
1516 1516  
1517 1517  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1518 1518  This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.  ##
... ... @@ -1519,7 +1519,7 @@
1519 1519  
1520 1520  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1521 1521  
1522 -----
1521 +-----
1523 1523  
1524 1524  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1525 1525  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1538,7 +1538,7 @@
1538 1538  **DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1539 1539  **Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1540 1540  
1541 -----
1540 +-----
1542 1542  
1543 1543  ## **Key Statistics**##
1544 1544  
... ... @@ -1554,7 +1554,7 @@
1554 1554   - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1555 1555   - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1556 1556  
1557 -----
1556 +-----
1558 1558  
1559 1559  ## **Findings**##
1560 1560  
... ... @@ -1570,7 +1570,7 @@
1570 1570   - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1571 1571   - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1572 1572  
1573 -----
1572 +-----
1574 1574  
1575 1575  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1576 1576  
... ... @@ -1586,7 +1586,7 @@
1586 1586   - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1587 1587   - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1588 1588  
1589 -----
1588 +-----
1590 1590  
1591 1591  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1592 1592  - Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
... ... @@ -1593,7 +1593,7 @@
1593 1593  - Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1594 1594  - Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1595 1595  
1596 -----
1595 +-----
1597 1597  
1598 1598  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1599 1599  
... ... @@ -1601,7 +1601,7 @@
1601 1601  2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1602 1602  3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1603 1603  
1604 -----
1603 +-----
1605 1605  
1606 1606  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1607 1607  This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
... ... @@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@
1608 1608  
1609 1609  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1610 1610  
1611 -----
1610 +-----
1612 1612  
1613 1613  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1614 1614  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1625,7 +1625,7 @@
1625 1625  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1626 1626  **Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1627 1627  
1628 -----
1627 +-----
1629 1629  
1630 1630  ## **Key Statistics**##
1631 1631  
... ... @@ -1641,7 +1641,7 @@
1641 1641   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1642 1642   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1643 1643  
1644 -----
1643 +-----
1645 1645  
1646 1646  ## **Findings**##
1647 1647  
... ... @@ -1657,7 +1657,7 @@
1657 1657   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1658 1658   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1659 1659  
1660 -----
1659 +-----
1661 1661  
1662 1662  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1663 1663  
... ... @@ -1673,7 +1673,7 @@
1673 1673   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1674 1674   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1675 1675  
1676 -----
1675 +-----
1677 1677  
1678 1678  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1679 1679  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
... ... @@ -1680,7 +1680,7 @@
1680 1680  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1681 1681  - Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1682 1682  
1683 -----
1682 +-----
1684 1684  
1685 1685  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1686 1686  
... ... @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@
1688 1688  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1689 1689  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1690 1690  
1691 -----
1690 +-----
1692 1692  
1693 1693  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1694 1694  This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
... ... @@ -1695,7 +1695,7 @@
1695 1695  
1696 1696  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1697 1697  
1698 -----
1697 +-----
1699 1699  
1700 1700  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1701 1701  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1712,7 +1712,7 @@
1712 1712  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1713 1713  **Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1714 1714  
1715 -----
1714 +-----
1716 1716  
1717 1717  ## **Key Statistics**##
1718 1718  
... ... @@ -1728,7 +1728,7 @@
1728 1728   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1729 1729   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1730 1730  
1731 -----
1730 +-----
1732 1732  
1733 1733  ## **Findings**##
1734 1734  
... ... @@ -1744,7 +1744,7 @@
1744 1744   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1745 1745   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1746 1746  
1747 -----
1746 +-----
1748 1748  
1749 1749  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1750 1750  
... ... @@ -1760,7 +1760,7 @@
1760 1760   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1761 1761   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1762 1762  
1763 -----
1762 +-----
1764 1764  
1765 1765  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1766 1766  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
... ... @@ -1767,7 +1767,7 @@
1767 1767  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1768 1768  - Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1769 1769  
1770 -----
1769 +-----
1771 1771  
1772 1772  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1773 1773  
... ... @@ -1775,7 +1775,7 @@
1775 1775  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1776 1776  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1777 1777  
1778 -----
1777 +-----
1779 1779  
1780 1780  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1781 1781  This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
... ... @@ -1782,7 +1782,7 @@
1782 1782  
1783 1783  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1784 1784  
1785 -----
1784 +-----
1786 1786  
1787 1787  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1788 1788  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1799,7 +1799,7 @@
1799 1799  **DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1800 1800  **Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1801 1801  
1802 -----
1801 +-----
1803 1803  
1804 1804  ## **Key Statistics**##
1805 1805  
... ... @@ -1815,7 +1815,7 @@
1815 1815   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1816 1816   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1817 1817  
1818 -----
1817 +-----
1819 1819  
1820 1820  ## **Findings**##
1821 1821  
... ... @@ -1831,7 +1831,7 @@
1831 1831   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1832 1832   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1833 1833  
1834 -----
1833 +-----
1835 1835  
1836 1836  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1837 1837  
... ... @@ -1847,7 +1847,7 @@
1847 1847   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1848 1848   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1849 1849  
1850 -----
1849 +-----
1851 1851  
1852 1852  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1853 1853  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
... ... @@ -1854,7 +1854,7 @@
1854 1854  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1855 1855  - Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
1856 1856  
1857 -----
1856 +-----
1858 1858  
1859 1859  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1860 1860  
... ... @@ -1862,7 +1862,7 @@
1862 1862  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1863 1863  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1864 1864  
1865 -----
1864 +-----
1866 1866  
1867 1867  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1868 1868  This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
... ... @@ -1869,7 +1869,7 @@
1869 1869  
1870 1870  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1871 1871  
1872 -----
1871 +-----
1873 1873  
1874 1874  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1875 1875  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1889,7 +1889,7 @@
1889 1889  **DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1890 1890  **Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1891 1891  
1892 -----
1891 +-----
1893 1893  
1894 1894  ## **Key Statistics**##
1895 1895  
... ... @@ -1905,7 +1905,7 @@
1905 1905   - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1906 1906   - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1907 1907  
1908 -----
1907 +-----
1909 1909  
1910 1910  ## **Findings**##
1911 1911  
... ... @@ -1921,7 +1921,7 @@
1921 1921   - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1922 1922   - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1923 1923  
1924 -----
1923 +-----
1925 1925  
1926 1926  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1927 1927  
... ... @@ -1937,7 +1937,7 @@
1937 1937   - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1938 1938   - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1939 1939  
1940 -----
1939 +-----
1941 1941  
1942 1942  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1943 1943  - Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
... ... @@ -1944,7 +1944,7 @@
1944 1944  - Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1945 1945  - Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
1946 1946  
1947 -----
1946 +-----
1948 1948  
1949 1949  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1950 1950  
... ... @@ -1952,12 +1952,12 @@
1952 1952  2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1953 1953  3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1954 1954  
1955 -----
1954 +-----
1956 1956  
1957 1957  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1958 1958  This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
1959 1959  
1960 -----
1959 +-----
1961 1961  
1962 1962  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1963 1963  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1974,7 +1974,7 @@
1974 1974  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
1975 1975  **Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
1976 1976  
1977 -----
1976 +-----
1978 1978  
1979 1979  ## **Key Statistics**##
1980 1980  
... ... @@ -1990,7 +1990,7 @@
1990 1990   - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
1991 1991   - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
1992 1992  
1993 -----
1992 +-----
1994 1994  
1995 1995  ## **Findings**##
1996 1996  
... ... @@ -2006,7 +2006,7 @@
2006 2006   - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
2007 2007   - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
2008 2008  
2009 -----
2008 +-----
2010 2010  
2011 2011  ## **Critique and Observations**##
2012 2012  
... ... @@ -2022,7 +2022,7 @@
2022 2022   - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
2023 2023   - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
2024 2024  
2025 -----
2024 +-----
2026 2026  
2027 2027  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2028 2028  - Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
... ... @@ -2029,7 +2029,7 @@
2029 2029  - Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
2030 2030  - Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
2031 2031  
2032 -----
2031 +-----
2033 2033  
2034 2034  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2035 2035  
... ... @@ -2037,12 +2037,12 @@
2037 2037  2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
2038 2038  3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
2039 2039  
2040 -----
2039 +-----
2041 2041  
2042 2042  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2043 2043  This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
2044 2044  
2045 -----
2044 +-----
2046 2046  
2047 2047  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2048 2048  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -2059,7 +2059,7 @@
2059 2059  **DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2060 2060  **Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
2061 2061  
2062 -----
2061 +-----
2063 2063  
2064 2064  ## **Key Statistics**##
2065 2065  
... ... @@ -2075,7 +2075,7 @@
2075 2075   - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
2076 2076   - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
2077 2077  
2078 -----
2077 +-----
2079 2079  
2080 2080  ## **Findings**##
2081 2081  
... ... @@ -2091,7 +2091,7 @@
2091 2091   - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
2092 2092   - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
2093 2093  
2094 -----
2093 +-----
2095 2095  
2096 2096  ## **Critique and Observations**##
2097 2097  
... ... @@ -2107,7 +2107,7 @@
2107 2107   - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
2108 2108   - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
2109 2109  
2110 -----
2109 +-----
2111 2111  
2112 2112  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2113 2113  - Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
... ... @@ -2114,7 +2114,7 @@
2114 2114  - Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
2115 2115  - Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
2116 2116  
2117 -----
2116 +-----
2118 2118  
2119 2119  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2120 2120  
... ... @@ -2122,13 +2122,15 @@
2122 2122  2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
2123 2123  3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
2124 2124  
2125 -----
2124 +-----
2126 2126  
2127 2127  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2128 2128  This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
2129 2129  
2130 -----
2129 +-----
2131 2131  
2132 2132  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2133 2133  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
2134 2134  {{/expand}}
2134 +
2135 +