0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 80.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 06:49
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 83.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 07:10
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,22 +1,23 @@
1 1  = Research at a Glance =
2 2  
3 -== Introduction ==
4 4  
5 -Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various fields such as **social psychology, public policy, behavioral economics, and more**. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout.
6 6  
7 -=== How to Use This Repository ===
5 +Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various important Racial themes. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout. I wanted to make this for a couple of reasons. Number one is organization. There are a ton of useful studies out there that expose the truth, sometimes inadvertently. You'll notice that in this initial draft the summaries are often woke and reflect the bias of the AI writing them as well as the researchers politically correct conclusions in most cases. That's because I havent gotten to going through and pointing out the reasons I put all of them in here. There is often an underlying hypocrisy or double standar, saying the quiet part out loud, or conclusions that are so much of an antithesis to what the data shows that made me want to include it. At least, thats the idea for once its polished. I have about 150 more studies to upload, so it will be a few weeks before I get through it all. Until such time, feel free to search for them yourself and edit in what you find, or add your own studies. If you like you can do it manually, or if you'd rather go the route I did, just feed the study into an AI and tell them to summarize the study using the following format:
8 8  
7 +
9 9  - Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
10 10  - Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
11 11  - Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
12 12  - If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
12 +- You'll also find a download link to the original full study in pdf form at the bottom of the collapsible block.
13 13  
14 14  
15 +{{toc/}}
15 15  
16 16  
17 -== Research Studies Repository ==
18 18  
19 19  
20 +
20 20  = Genetics =
21 21  
22 22  
... ... @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
30 30  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
31 31  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
32 32  
33 ------
34 +----
34 34  
35 35  ## **Key Statistics**##
36 36  
... ... @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
46 46   - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
47 47   - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
48 48  
49 ------
50 +----
50 50  
51 51  ## **Findings**##
52 52  
... ... @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
62 62   - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
63 63   - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
64 64  
65 ------
66 +----
66 66  
67 67  ## **Critique and Observations**##
68 68  
... ... @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
78 78   - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
79 79   - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
80 80  
81 ------
82 +----
82 82  
83 83  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
84 84  - Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
... ... @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
85 85  - Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
86 86  - Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
87 87  
88 ------
89 +----
89 89  
90 90  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
91 91  
... ... @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
93 93  2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
94 94  3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
95 95  
96 ------
97 +----
97 97  
98 98  ## **Summary of Research Study**
99 99  This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
... ... @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
100 100  
101 101  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
102 102  
103 ------
104 +----
104 104  
105 105  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
106 106  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
117 117  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
118 118  **Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
119 119  
120 ------
121 +----
121 121  
122 122  ## **Key Statistics**##
123 123  
... ... @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@
133 133   - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
134 134   - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
135 135  
136 ------
137 +----
137 137  
138 138  ## **Findings**##
139 139  
... ... @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@
149 149   - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
150 150   - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
151 151  
152 ------
153 +----
153 153  
154 154  ## **Critique and Observations**##
155 155  
... ... @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
165 165   - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
166 166   - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
167 167  
168 ------
169 +----
169 169  
170 170  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
171 171  - Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
... ... @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@
172 172  - Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
173 173  - Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
174 174  
175 ------
176 +----
176 176  
177 177  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
178 178  
... ... @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
180 180  2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
181 181  3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
182 182  
183 ------
184 +----
184 184  
185 185  ## **Summary of Research Study**
186 186  This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
... ... @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@
187 187  
188 188  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
189 189  
190 ------
191 +----
191 191  
192 192  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
193 193  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@
204 204  **DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
205 205  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
206 206  
207 ------
208 +----
208 208  
209 209  ## **Key Statistics**##
210 210  
... ... @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@
220 220   - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
221 221   - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
222 222  
223 ------
224 +----
224 224  
225 225  ## **Findings**##
226 226  
... ... @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@
236 236   - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
237 237   - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
238 238  
239 ------
240 +----
240 240  
241 241  ## **Critique and Observations**##
242 242  
... ... @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
252 252   - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
253 253   - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
254 254  
255 ------
256 +----
256 256  
257 257  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
258 258  - Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
... ... @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@
259 259  - Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
260 260  - Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
261 261  
262 ------
263 +----
263 263  
264 264  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
265 265  
... ... @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@
267 267  2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
268 268  3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
269 269  
270 ------
271 +----
271 271  
272 272  ## **Summary of Research Study**
273 273  This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
... ... @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@
274 274  
275 275  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
276 276  
277 ------
278 +----
278 278  
279 279  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
280 280  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@
291 291  **DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
292 292  **Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
293 293  
294 ------
295 +----
295 295  
296 296  ## **Key Statistics**##
297 297  
... ... @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@
307 307   - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
308 308   - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
309 309  
310 ------
311 +----
311 311  
312 312  ## **Findings**##
313 313  
... ... @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@
323 323   - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
324 324   - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
325 325  
326 ------
327 +----
327 327  
328 328  ## **Critique and Observations**##
329 329  
... ... @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@
339 339   - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
340 340   - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
341 341  
342 ------
343 +----
343 343  
344 344  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
345 345  - Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
... ... @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@
346 346  - Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
347 347  - Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
348 348  
349 ------
350 +----
350 350  
351 351  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
352 352  
... ... @@ -354,7 +354,7 @@
354 354  2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
355 355  3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
356 356  
357 ------
358 +----
358 358  
359 359  ## **Summary of Research Study**
360 360  This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
... ... @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@
361 361  
362 362  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
363 363  
364 ------
365 +----
365 365  
366 366  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
367 367  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@
378 378  **DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
379 379  **Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
380 380  
381 ------
382 +----
382 382  
383 383  ## **Key Statistics**##
384 384  
... ... @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@
394 394   - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
395 395   - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
396 396  
397 ------
398 +----
398 398  
399 399  ## **Findings**##
400 400  
... ... @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@
411 411   - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
412 412   - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
413 413  
414 ------
415 +----
415 415  
416 416  ## **Critique and Observations**##
417 417  
... ... @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@
427 427   - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
428 428   - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
429 429  
430 ------
431 +----
431 431  
432 432  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
433 433  - Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
... ... @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@
434 434  - Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
435 435  - Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
436 436  
437 ------
438 +----
438 438  
439 439  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
440 440  
... ... @@ -442,12 +442,12 @@
442 442  2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
443 443  3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
444 444  
445 ------
446 +----
446 446  
447 447  ## **Summary of Research Study**
448 448  This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
449 449  
450 ------
451 +----
451 451  
452 452  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
453 453  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@
464 464  **DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
465 465  **Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
466 466  
467 ------
468 +----
468 468  
469 469  ## **Key Statistics**##
470 470  
... ... @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@
480 480   - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
481 481   - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
482 482  
483 ------
484 +----
484 484  
485 485  ## **Findings**##
486 486  
... ... @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@
496 496   - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
497 497   - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
498 498  
499 ------
500 +----
500 500  
501 501  ## **Critique and Observations**##
502 502  
... ... @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@
512 512   - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
513 513   - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
514 514  
515 ------
516 +----
516 516  
517 517  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
518 518  - Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
... ... @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@
519 519  - Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
520 520  - Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
521 521  
522 ------
523 +----
523 523  
524 524  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
525 525  
... ... @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@
527 527  2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
528 528  3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
529 529  
530 ------
531 +----
531 531  
532 532  ## **Summary of Research Study**
533 533  This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
... ... @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@
534 534  
535 535  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
536 536  
537 ------
538 +----
538 538  
539 539  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
540 540  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@
551 551  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
552 552  **Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
553 553  
554 ------
555 +----
555 555  
556 556  ## **Key Statistics**##
557 557  
... ... @@ -567,7 +567,7 @@
567 567   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
568 568   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
569 569  
570 ------
571 +----
571 571  
572 572  ## **Findings**##
573 573  
... ... @@ -583,7 +583,7 @@
583 583   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
584 584   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
585 585  
586 ------
587 +----
587 587  
588 588  ## **Critique and Observations**##
589 589  
... ... @@ -599,7 +599,7 @@
599 599   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
600 600   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
601 601  
602 ------
603 +----
603 603  
604 604  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
605 605  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
... ... @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@
606 606  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
607 607  - Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
608 608  
609 ------
610 +----
610 610  
611 611  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
612 612  
... ... @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@
614 614  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
615 615  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
616 616  
617 ------
618 +----
618 618  
619 619  ## **Summary of Research Study**
620 620  This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
... ... @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@
621 621  
622 622  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
623 623  
624 ------
625 +----
625 625  
626 626  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
627 627  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -638,7 +638,7 @@
638 638  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
639 639  **Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
640 640  
641 ------
642 +----
642 642  
643 643  ## **Key Statistics**##
644 644  
... ... @@ -654,7 +654,7 @@
654 654   - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
655 655   - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
656 656  
657 ------
658 +----
658 658  
659 659  ## **Findings**##
660 660  
... ... @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@
670 670   - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
671 671   - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
672 672  
673 ------
674 +----
674 674  
675 675  ## **Critique and Observations**##
676 676  
... ... @@ -686,7 +686,7 @@
686 686   - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
687 687   - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
688 688  
689 ------
690 +----
690 690  
691 691  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
692 692  - Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
... ... @@ -693,7 +693,7 @@
693 693  - Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
694 694  - Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
695 695  
696 ------
697 +----
697 697  
698 698  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
699 699  
... ... @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@
701 701  2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
702 702  3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
703 703  
704 ------
705 +----
705 705  
706 706  ## **Summary of Research Study**
707 707  This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
... ... @@ -708,7 +708,7 @@
708 708  
709 709  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
710 710  
711 ------
712 +----
712 712  
713 713  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
714 714  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -725,7 +725,7 @@
725 725  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
726 726  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
727 727  
728 ------
729 +----
729 729  
730 730  ## **Key Statistics**##
731 731  
... ... @@ -741,7 +741,7 @@
741 741   - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
742 742   - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
743 743  
744 ------
745 +----
745 745  
746 746  ## **Findings**##
747 747  
... ... @@ -757,7 +757,7 @@
757 757   - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
758 758   - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
759 759  
760 ------
761 +----
761 761  
762 762  ## **Critique and Observations**##
763 763  
... ... @@ -773,7 +773,7 @@
773 773   - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
774 774   - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
775 775  
776 ------
777 +----
777 777  
778 778  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
779 779  - Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
... ... @@ -780,7 +780,7 @@
780 780  - Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
781 781  - Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
782 782  
783 ------
784 +----
784 784  
785 785  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
786 786  
... ... @@ -788,7 +788,7 @@
788 788  2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
789 789  3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
790 790  
791 ------
792 +----
792 792  
793 793  ## **Summary of Research Study**
794 794  This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.  ##
... ... @@ -795,7 +795,7 @@
795 795  
796 796  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
797 797  
798 ------
799 +----
799 799  
800 800  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
801 801  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -814,7 +814,7 @@
814 814  
815 815  **Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
816 816  
817 -=== **Key Statistics** ===
818 + **Key Statistics**
818 818  
819 819  1. **General Observations:**
820 820   - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
... ... @@ -824,12 +824,12 @@
824 824   - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
825 825   - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
826 826  
827 -=== **Findings** ===
828 + **Findings**
828 828  
829 829  - Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
830 830  - Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
831 831  
832 -=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
833 + **Relevance to Subproject**
833 833  
834 834  - Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
835 835  - Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
... ... @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@
836 836  {{/expand}}
837 837  
838 838  
839 ------
840 +----
840 840  
841 841  = Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
842 842  
... ... @@ -851,7 +851,7 @@
851 851  **DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
852 852  **Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
853 853  
854 ------
855 +----
855 855  
856 856  ## **Key Statistics**##
857 857  
... ... @@ -867,7 +867,7 @@
867 867   - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
868 868   - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
869 869  
870 ------
871 +----
871 871  
872 872  ## **Findings**##
873 873  
... ... @@ -883,7 +883,7 @@
883 883   - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
884 884   - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
885 885  
886 ------
887 +----
887 887  
888 888  ## **Critique and Observations**##
889 889  
... ... @@ -899,13 +899,13 @@
899 899   - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
900 900   - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
901 901  
902 ------
903 +----
903 903  
904 904  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
905 905  - Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
906 906  - Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
907 907  
908 ------
909 +----
909 909  
910 910  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
911 911  
... ... @@ -912,7 +912,7 @@
912 912  1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
913 913  2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
914 914  
915 ------
916 +----
916 916  
917 917  ## **Summary of Research Study**
918 918  This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.  ##
... ... @@ -919,7 +919,7 @@
919 919  
920 920  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
921 921  
922 ------
923 +----
923 923  
924 924  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
925 925  {{velocity}}
... ... @@ -943,7 +943,7 @@
943 943  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
944 944  **Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
945 945  
946 ------
947 +----
947 947  
948 948  ## **Key Statistics**##
949 949  
... ... @@ -961,7 +961,7 @@
961 961   - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
962 962   - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
963 963  
964 ------
965 +----
965 965  
966 966  ## **Findings**##
967 967  
... ... @@ -977,7 +977,7 @@
977 977   - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
978 978   - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
979 979  
980 ------
981 +----
981 981  
982 982  ## **Critique and Observations**##
983 983  
... ... @@ -993,7 +993,7 @@
993 993   - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
994 994   - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
995 995  
996 ------
997 +----
997 997  
998 998  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
999 999  - Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
... ... @@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@
1000 1000  - Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
1001 1001  - Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
1002 1002  
1003 ------
1004 +----
1004 1004  
1005 1005  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1006 1006  
... ... @@ -1008,12 +1008,12 @@
1008 1008  2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
1009 1009  3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
1010 1010  
1011 ------
1012 +----
1012 1012  
1013 1013  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1014 1014  This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
1015 1015  
1016 ------
1017 +----
1017 1017  
1018 1018  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1019 1019  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@
1030 1030  **DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
1031 1031  **Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
1032 1032  
1033 ------
1034 +----
1034 1034  
1035 1035  ## **Key Statistics**##
1036 1036  
... ... @@ -1046,7 +1046,7 @@
1046 1046   - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
1047 1047   - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
1048 1048  
1049 ------
1050 +----
1050 1050  
1051 1051  ## **Findings**##
1052 1052  
... ... @@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@
1062 1062   - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
1063 1063   - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
1064 1064  
1065 ------
1066 +----
1066 1066  
1067 1067  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1068 1068  
... ... @@ -1078,7 +1078,7 @@
1078 1078   - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
1079 1079   - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
1080 1080  
1081 ------
1082 +----
1082 1082  
1083 1083  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1084 1084  - Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
... ... @@ -1085,7 +1085,7 @@
1085 1085  - Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
1086 1086  - Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
1087 1087  
1088 ------
1089 +----
1089 1089  
1090 1090  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1091 1091  
... ... @@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@
1093 1093  2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
1094 1094  3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
1095 1095  
1096 ------
1097 +----
1097 1097  
1098 1098  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1099 1099  This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
... ... @@ -1100,7 +1100,7 @@
1100 1100  
1101 1101  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1102 1102  
1103 ------
1104 +----
1104 1104  
1105 1105  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1106 1106  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@
1120 1120  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1121 1121  **Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1122 1122  
1123 ------
1124 +----
1124 1124  
1125 1125  ## **Key Statistics**##
1126 1126  
... ... @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@
1136 1136   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1137 1137   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1138 1138  
1139 ------
1140 +----
1140 1140  
1141 1141  ## **Findings**##
1142 1142  
... ... @@ -1152,7 +1152,7 @@
1152 1152   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1153 1153   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1154 1154  
1155 ------
1156 +----
1156 1156  
1157 1157  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1158 1158  
... ... @@ -1168,7 +1168,7 @@
1168 1168   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1169 1169   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1170 1170  
1171 ------
1172 +----
1172 1172  
1173 1173  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1174 1174  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
... ... @@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@
1175 1175  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1176 1176  - Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1177 1177  
1178 ------
1179 +----
1179 1179  
1180 1180  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1181 1181  
... ... @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@
1183 1183  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1184 1184  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1185 1185  
1186 ------
1187 +----
1187 1187  
1188 1188  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1189 1189  This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
... ... @@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@
1190 1190  
1191 1191  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1192 1192  
1193 ------
1194 +----
1194 1194  
1195 1195  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1196 1196  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1207,7 +1207,7 @@
1207 1207  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1208 1208  **Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1209 1209  
1210 ------
1211 +----
1211 1211  
1212 1212  ## **Key Statistics**##
1213 1213  
... ... @@ -1223,7 +1223,7 @@
1223 1223   - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1224 1224   - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1225 1225  
1226 ------
1227 +----
1227 1227  
1228 1228  ## **Findings**##
1229 1229  
... ... @@ -1239,7 +1239,7 @@
1239 1239   - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1240 1240   - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1241 1241  
1242 ------
1243 +----
1243 1243  
1244 1244  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1245 1245  
... ... @@ -1255,7 +1255,7 @@
1255 1255   - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1256 1256   - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1257 1257  
1258 ------
1259 +----
1259 1259  
1260 1260  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1261 1261  - Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
... ... @@ -1262,7 +1262,7 @@
1262 1262  - Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1263 1263  - Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1264 1264  
1265 ------
1266 +----
1266 1266  
1267 1267  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1268 1268  
... ... @@ -1270,7 +1270,7 @@
1270 1270  2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1271 1271  3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1272 1272  
1273 ------
1274 +----
1274 1274  
1275 1275  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1276 1276  This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
... ... @@ -1277,7 +1277,7 @@
1277 1277  
1278 1278  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1279 1279  
1280 ------
1281 +----
1281 1281  
1282 1282  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1283 1283  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1294,7 +1294,7 @@
1294 1294  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1295 1295  **Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1296 1296  
1297 ------
1298 +----
1298 1298  
1299 1299  ## **Key Statistics**##
1300 1300  
... ... @@ -1310,7 +1310,7 @@
1310 1310   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1311 1311   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1312 1312  
1313 ------
1314 +----
1314 1314  
1315 1315  ## **Findings**##
1316 1316  
... ... @@ -1326,7 +1326,7 @@
1326 1326   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1327 1327   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1328 1328  
1329 ------
1330 +----
1330 1330  
1331 1331  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1332 1332  
... ... @@ -1342,7 +1342,7 @@
1342 1342   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1343 1343   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1344 1344  
1345 ------
1346 +----
1346 1346  
1347 1347  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1348 1348  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
... ... @@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@
1349 1349  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1350 1350  - Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1351 1351  
1352 ------
1353 +----
1353 1353  
1354 1354  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1355 1355  
... ... @@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@
1357 1357  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1358 1358  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1359 1359  
1360 ------
1361 +----
1361 1361  
1362 1362  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1363 1363  This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
... ... @@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@
1364 1364  
1365 1365  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1366 1366  
1367 ------
1368 +----
1368 1368  
1369 1369  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1370 1370  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1448,7 +1448,7 @@
1448 1448  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1449 1449  **Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1450 1450  
1451 ------
1452 +----
1452 1452  
1453 1453  ## **Key Statistics**##
1454 1454  
... ... @@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@
1464 1464   - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1465 1465   - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1466 1466  
1467 ------
1468 +----
1468 1468  
1469 1469  ## **Findings**##
1470 1470  
... ... @@ -1480,7 +1480,7 @@
1480 1480   - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1481 1481   - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1482 1482  
1483 ------
1484 +----
1484 1484  
1485 1485  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1486 1486  
... ... @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@
1496 1496   - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1497 1497   - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1498 1498  
1499 ------
1500 +----
1500 1500  
1501 1501  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1502 1502  - Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
... ... @@ -1503,7 +1503,7 @@
1503 1503  - Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1504 1504  - Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1505 1505  
1506 ------
1507 +----
1507 1507  
1508 1508  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1509 1509  
... ... @@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@
1511 1511  2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1512 1512  3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1513 1513  
1514 ------
1515 +----
1515 1515  
1516 1516  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1517 1517  This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.  ##
... ... @@ -1518,7 +1518,7 @@
1518 1518  
1519 1519  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1520 1520  
1521 ------
1522 +----
1522 1522  
1523 1523  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1524 1524  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1537,7 +1537,7 @@
1537 1537  **DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1538 1538  **Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1539 1539  
1540 ------
1541 +----
1541 1541  
1542 1542  ## **Key Statistics**##
1543 1543  
... ... @@ -1553,7 +1553,7 @@
1553 1553   - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1554 1554   - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1555 1555  
1556 ------
1557 +----
1557 1557  
1558 1558  ## **Findings**##
1559 1559  
... ... @@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@
1569 1569   - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1570 1570   - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1571 1571  
1572 ------
1573 +----
1573 1573  
1574 1574  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1575 1575  
... ... @@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@
1585 1585   - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1586 1586   - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1587 1587  
1588 ------
1589 +----
1589 1589  
1590 1590  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1591 1591  - Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
... ... @@ -1592,7 +1592,7 @@
1592 1592  - Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1593 1593  - Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1594 1594  
1595 ------
1596 +----
1596 1596  
1597 1597  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1598 1598  
... ... @@ -1600,7 +1600,7 @@
1600 1600  2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1601 1601  3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1602 1602  
1603 ------
1604 +----
1604 1604  
1605 1605  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1606 1606  This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
... ... @@ -1607,7 +1607,7 @@
1607 1607  
1608 1608  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1609 1609  
1610 ------
1611 +----
1611 1611  
1612 1612  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1613 1613  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1624,7 +1624,7 @@
1624 1624  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1625 1625  **Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1626 1626  
1627 ------
1628 +----
1628 1628  
1629 1629  ## **Key Statistics**##
1630 1630  
... ... @@ -1640,7 +1640,7 @@
1640 1640   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1641 1641   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1642 1642  
1643 ------
1644 +----
1644 1644  
1645 1645  ## **Findings**##
1646 1646  
... ... @@ -1656,7 +1656,7 @@
1656 1656   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1657 1657   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1658 1658  
1659 ------
1660 +----
1660 1660  
1661 1661  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1662 1662  
... ... @@ -1672,7 +1672,7 @@
1672 1672   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1673 1673   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1674 1674  
1675 ------
1676 +----
1676 1676  
1677 1677  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1678 1678  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
... ... @@ -1679,7 +1679,7 @@
1679 1679  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1680 1680  - Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1681 1681  
1682 ------
1683 +----
1683 1683  
1684 1684  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1685 1685  
... ... @@ -1687,7 +1687,7 @@
1687 1687  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1688 1688  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1689 1689  
1690 ------
1691 +----
1691 1691  
1692 1692  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1693 1693  This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
... ... @@ -1694,7 +1694,7 @@
1694 1694  
1695 1695  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1696 1696  
1697 ------
1698 +----
1698 1698  
1699 1699  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1700 1700  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1711,7 +1711,7 @@
1711 1711  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1712 1712  **Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1713 1713  
1714 ------
1715 +----
1715 1715  
1716 1716  ## **Key Statistics**##
1717 1717  
... ... @@ -1727,7 +1727,7 @@
1727 1727   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1728 1728   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1729 1729  
1730 ------
1731 +----
1731 1731  
1732 1732  ## **Findings**##
1733 1733  
... ... @@ -1743,7 +1743,7 @@
1743 1743   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1744 1744   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1745 1745  
1746 ------
1747 +----
1747 1747  
1748 1748  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1749 1749  
... ... @@ -1759,7 +1759,7 @@
1759 1759   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1760 1760   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1761 1761  
1762 ------
1763 +----
1763 1763  
1764 1764  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1765 1765  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
... ... @@ -1766,7 +1766,7 @@
1766 1766  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1767 1767  - Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1768 1768  
1769 ------
1770 +----
1770 1770  
1771 1771  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1772 1772  
... ... @@ -1774,7 +1774,7 @@
1774 1774  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1775 1775  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1776 1776  
1777 ------
1778 +----
1778 1778  
1779 1779  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1780 1780  This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
... ... @@ -1781,7 +1781,7 @@
1781 1781  
1782 1782  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1783 1783  
1784 ------
1785 +----
1785 1785  
1786 1786  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1787 1787  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1798,7 +1798,7 @@
1798 1798  **DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1799 1799  **Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1800 1800  
1801 ------
1802 +----
1802 1802  
1803 1803  ## **Key Statistics**##
1804 1804  
... ... @@ -1814,7 +1814,7 @@
1814 1814   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1815 1815   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1816 1816  
1817 ------
1818 +----
1818 1818  
1819 1819  ## **Findings**##
1820 1820  
... ... @@ -1830,7 +1830,7 @@
1830 1830   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1831 1831   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1832 1832  
1833 ------
1834 +----
1834 1834  
1835 1835  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1836 1836  
... ... @@ -1846,7 +1846,7 @@
1846 1846   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1847 1847   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1848 1848  
1849 ------
1850 +----
1850 1850  
1851 1851  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1852 1852  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
... ... @@ -1853,7 +1853,7 @@
1853 1853  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1854 1854  - Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
1855 1855  
1856 ------
1857 +----
1857 1857  
1858 1858  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1859 1859  
... ... @@ -1861,7 +1861,7 @@
1861 1861  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1862 1862  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1863 1863  
1864 ------
1865 +----
1865 1865  
1866 1866  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1867 1867  This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
... ... @@ -1868,7 +1868,7 @@
1868 1868  
1869 1869  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1870 1870  
1871 ------
1872 +----
1872 1872  
1873 1873  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1874 1874  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1888,7 +1888,7 @@
1888 1888  **DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1889 1889  **Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1890 1890  
1891 ------
1892 +----
1892 1892  
1893 1893  ## **Key Statistics**##
1894 1894  
... ... @@ -1904,7 +1904,7 @@
1904 1904   - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1905 1905   - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1906 1906  
1907 ------
1908 +----
1908 1908  
1909 1909  ## **Findings**##
1910 1910  
... ... @@ -1920,7 +1920,7 @@
1920 1920   - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1921 1921   - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1922 1922  
1923 ------
1924 +----
1924 1924  
1925 1925  ## **Critique and Observations**##
1926 1926  
... ... @@ -1936,7 +1936,7 @@
1936 1936   - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1937 1937   - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1938 1938  
1939 ------
1940 +----
1940 1940  
1941 1941  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1942 1942  - Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
... ... @@ -1943,7 +1943,7 @@
1943 1943  - Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1944 1944  - Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
1945 1945  
1946 ------
1947 +----
1947 1947  
1948 1948  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1949 1949  
... ... @@ -1951,12 +1951,12 @@
1951 1951  2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1952 1952  3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1953 1953  
1954 ------
1955 +----
1955 1955  
1956 1956  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1957 1957  This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
1958 1958  
1959 ------
1960 +----
1960 1960  
1961 1961  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1962 1962  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -1973,7 +1973,7 @@
1973 1973  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
1974 1974  **Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
1975 1975  
1976 ------
1977 +----
1977 1977  
1978 1978  ## **Key Statistics**##
1979 1979  
... ... @@ -1989,7 +1989,7 @@
1989 1989   - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
1990 1990   - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
1991 1991  
1992 ------
1993 +----
1993 1993  
1994 1994  ## **Findings**##
1995 1995  
... ... @@ -2005,7 +2005,7 @@
2005 2005   - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
2006 2006   - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
2007 2007  
2008 ------
2009 +----
2009 2009  
2010 2010  ## **Critique and Observations**##
2011 2011  
... ... @@ -2021,7 +2021,7 @@
2021 2021   - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
2022 2022   - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
2023 2023  
2024 ------
2025 +----
2025 2025  
2026 2026  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2027 2027  - Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
... ... @@ -2028,7 +2028,7 @@
2028 2028  - Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
2029 2029  - Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
2030 2030  
2031 ------
2032 +----
2032 2032  
2033 2033  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2034 2034  
... ... @@ -2036,12 +2036,12 @@
2036 2036  2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
2037 2037  3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
2038 2038  
2039 ------
2040 +----
2040 2040  
2041 2041  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2042 2042  This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
2043 2043  
2044 ------
2045 +----
2045 2045  
2046 2046  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2047 2047  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
... ... @@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@
2058 2058  **DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2059 2059  **Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
2060 2060  
2061 ------
2062 +----
2062 2062  
2063 2063  ## **Key Statistics**##
2064 2064  
... ... @@ -2074,7 +2074,7 @@
2074 2074   - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
2075 2075   - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
2076 2076  
2077 ------
2078 +----
2078 2078  
2079 2079  ## **Findings**##
2080 2080  
... ... @@ -2090,7 +2090,7 @@
2090 2090   - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
2091 2091   - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
2092 2092  
2093 ------
2094 +----
2094 2094  
2095 2095  ## **Critique and Observations**##
2096 2096  
... ... @@ -2106,7 +2106,7 @@
2106 2106   - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
2107 2107   - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
2108 2108  
2109 ------
2110 +----
2110 2110  
2111 2111  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2112 2112  - Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
... ... @@ -2113,7 +2113,7 @@
2113 2113  - Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
2114 2114  - Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
2115 2115  
2116 ------
2117 +----
2117 2117  
2118 2118  ## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2119 2119  
... ... @@ -2121,15 +2121,13 @@
2121 2121  2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
2122 2122  3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
2123 2123  
2124 ------
2125 +----
2125 2125  
2126 2126  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2127 2127  This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
2128 2128  
2129 ------
2130 +----
2130 2130  
2131 2131  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2132 2132  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
2133 2133  {{/expand}}
2134 -
2135 -