0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 80.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 06:49
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 75.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 05:27
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -11,550 +11,627 @@
11 11  - Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
12 12  - If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
13 13  
14 +{{toc/}}
14 14  
16 +== Research Studies Repository ==
15 15  
16 16  
17 -== Research Studies Repository ==
19 += Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding =
20 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
21 +**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
22 +**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
23 +**Author(s):** Smith et al.
24 +**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
25 +**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
26 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
18 18  
28 +**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
19 19  
20 -= Genetics =
30 +=== **Key Statistics** ===
21 21  
32 +1. **General Observations:**
33 + - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
34 + - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
22 22  
23 -== Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History ==
36 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
37 + - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
38 + - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
24 24  
25 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
26 -**Source:** *Nature*
27 -**Date of Publication:** *2009*
28 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
29 -**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
30 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
31 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
40 +=== **Findings** ===
32 32  
33 ------
42 +- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
43 +- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
34 34  
35 -## **Key Statistics**##
45 +=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
36 36  
47 +- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
48 +- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
49 +{{/expand}}
50 +
51 +{{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
52 +**Source:** [Journal/Institution Name]
53 +**Date of Publication:** [Publication Date]
54 +**Author(s):** [Author(s) Name(s)]
55 +**Title:** "[Study Title]"
56 +**DOI:** [DOI or Link]
57 +**Subject Matter:** [Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]
58 +
59 +---
60 +
61 +## **Key Statistics**
37 37  1. **General Observations:**
38 - - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
39 - - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
63 + - [Statistical finding or observation]
64 + - [Statistical finding or observation]
40 40  
41 41  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
42 - - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
43 - - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
67 + - [Breakdown of findings by gender, race, or other subgroups]
44 44  
45 45  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
46 - - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
47 - - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
70 + - [Any additional findings or significant statistics]
48 48  
49 ------
72 +---
50 50  
51 -## **Findings**##
52 -
74 +## **Findings**
53 53  1. **Primary Observations:**
54 - - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
55 - - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
76 + - [High-level findings or trends in the study]
56 56  
57 57  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
58 - - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
59 - - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
79 + - [Disparities or differences highlighted in the study]
60 60  
61 61  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
62 - - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
63 - - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
82 + - [Detailed explanation of any notable specific findings]
64 64  
65 ------
84 +---
66 66  
67 -## **Critique and Observations**##
68 -
86 +## **Critique and Observations**
69 69  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
70 - - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
71 - - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
88 + - [Examples: strong methodology, large dataset, etc.]
72 72  
73 73  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
74 - - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
75 - - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
91 + - [Examples: data gaps, lack of upstream analysis, etc.]
76 76  
77 77  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
78 - - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
79 - - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
94 + - [Ideas for further research or addressing limitations]
80 80  
81 ------
96 +---
82 82  
83 83  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
84 -- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
85 -- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
86 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
99 +- [Explanation of how this study contributes to your subproject goals.]
100 +- [Any key arguments or findings that support or challenge your views.]
87 87  
88 ------
102 +---
89 89  
90 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
104 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
105 +1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
106 +2. [Potential studies or sources to complement this analysis.]
91 91  
92 -1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
93 -2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
94 -3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
108 +---
95 95  
96 ------
97 -
98 98  ## **Summary of Research Study**
99 -This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
111 +This study examines **[core research question or focus]**, providing insights into **[main subject area]**. The research utilized **[sample size and methodology]** to assess **[key variables or measured outcomes]**.
100 100  
101 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studys contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
113 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
102 102  
103 ------
115 +---
104 104  
105 105  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
106 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
118 +{{velocity}}
119 +#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
120 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
121 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
122 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
123 +#else
124 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
125 +#end
126 +{{/velocity}}
127 +
107 107  {{/expand}}
108 108  
130 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
109 109  
110 -== Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations ==
111 111  
112 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
113 -**Source:** *Nature*
114 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
115 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
116 -**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
117 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
118 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
119 119  
120 ------
134 +---
121 121  
122 -## **Key Statistics**##
136 +{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}}
137 +**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
138 +**Date of Publication:** *2020*
139 +**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
140 +**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
141 +**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
142 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*
123 123  
144 +---
145 +
146 +## **Key Statistics**
124 124  1. **General Observations:**
125 - - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
126 - - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
148 + - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
149 + - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
127 127  
128 128  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
129 - - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
130 - - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
152 + - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
153 + - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
131 131  
132 132  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
133 - - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
134 - - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
156 + - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
157 + - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
135 135  
136 ------
159 +---
137 137  
138 -## **Findings**##
139 -
161 +## **Findings**
140 140  1. **Primary Observations:**
141 - - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
142 - - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
163 + - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
164 + - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
143 143  
144 144  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
145 - - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
146 - - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
167 + - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
168 + - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
147 147  
148 148  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
149 - - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
150 - - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
171 + - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
172 + - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
151 151  
152 ------
174 +---
153 153  
154 -## **Critique and Observations**##
155 -
176 +## **Critique and Observations**
156 156  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
157 - - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
158 - - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
178 + - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
179 + - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
159 159  
160 160  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
161 - - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
162 - - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
182 + - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
183 + - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
163 163  
164 164  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
165 - - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
166 - - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
186 + - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
187 + - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
167 167  
168 ------
189 +---
169 169  
170 170  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
171 -- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
172 -- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
173 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
192 +- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
193 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
174 174  
175 ------
195 +---
176 176  
177 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
197 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
198 +1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
199 +2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
178 178  
179 -1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
180 -2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
181 -3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
201 +---
182 182  
183 ------
184 -
185 185  ## **Summary of Research Study**
186 -This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
204 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.
187 187  
188 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studys contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
206 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
189 189  
190 ------
208 +---
191 191  
192 192  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
193 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
211 +{{velocity}}
212 +#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
213 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
214 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
215 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
216 +#else
217 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
218 +#end
219 +{{/velocity}}
220 +
194 194  {{/expand}}
195 195  
223 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
196 196  
197 -== Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies ==
198 198  
199 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
200 -**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
201 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
202 -**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
203 -**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
204 -**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
205 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
226 +{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}}
227 +**Source:** *Current Psychology*
228 +**Date of Publication:** *2024*
229 +**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
230 +**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
231 +**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
232 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
206 206  
207 ------
234 +---
208 208  
209 -## **Key Statistics**##
210 -
236 +## **Key Statistics**
211 211  1. **General Observations:**
212 - - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
213 - - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
238 + - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
239 + - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
214 214  
215 215  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
216 - - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
217 - - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
242 + - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
243 + - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
218 218  
219 219  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
220 - - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
221 - - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
246 + - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
247 + - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
222 222  
223 ------
249 +---
224 224  
225 -## **Findings**##
226 -
251 +## **Findings**
227 227  1. **Primary Observations:**
228 - - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
229 - - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
253 + - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
254 + - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
230 230  
231 231  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
232 - - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (70-80%)**.
233 - - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
257 + - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
258 + - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
234 234  
235 235  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
236 - - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
237 - - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
261 + - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
262 + - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
238 238  
239 ------
264 +---
240 240  
241 -## **Critique and Observations**##
242 -
266 +## **Critique and Observations**
243 243  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
244 - - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
245 - - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
268 + - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
269 + - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
246 246  
247 247  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
248 - - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
249 - - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
272 + - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
273 + - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
250 250  
251 251  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
252 - - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
253 - - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
276 + - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
277 + - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
254 254  
255 ------
279 +---
256 256  
257 257  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
258 -- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
259 -- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
260 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
282 +- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
283 +- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
284 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
261 261  
262 ------
286 +---
263 263  
264 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
288 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
289 +1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
290 +2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
291 +3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
265 265  
266 -1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
267 -2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
268 -3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
293 +---
269 269  
270 ------
271 -
272 272  ## **Summary of Research Study**
273 -This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
296 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.
274 274  
275 275  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
276 276  
277 ------
300 +---
278 278  
279 279  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
280 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
303 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
304 +
281 281  {{/expand}}
282 282  
307 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
283 283  
284 -== Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease ==
309 +{{expand title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" expanded="false"}} Source: Addictive Behaviors
310 +Date of Publication: 2016
311 +Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
312 +Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
313 +DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
314 +Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
285 285  
286 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
287 -**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
288 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
289 -**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
290 -**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
291 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
292 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
316 +Key Statistics
317 +General Observations:
293 293  
294 ------
319 +Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
320 +Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
321 +Subgroup Analysis:
295 295  
296 -## **Key Statistics**##
323 +Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
324 +Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
325 +Other Significant Data Points:
297 297  
327 +Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
328 +Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
329 +Findings
330 +Primary Observations:
331 +
332 +Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
333 +Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
334 +Subgroup Trends:
335 +
336 +Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
337 +College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
338 +Specific Case Analysis:
339 +
340 +Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
341 +Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
342 +Critique and Observations
343 +Strengths of the Study:
344 +
345 +Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
346 +Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
347 +Limitations of the Study:
348 +
349 +Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
350 +Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
351 +Suggestions for Improvement:
352 +
353 +Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
354 +Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
355 +Relevance to Subproject
356 +Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
357 +Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
358 +Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
359 +Suggestions for Further Exploration
360 +Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
361 +Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
362 +Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
363 +Summary of Research Study
364 +This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
365 +
366 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
367 +
368 +📄 Download Full Study
369 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
370 +
371 +{{/expand}}
372 +
373 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
374 +
375 +{{expand title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?" expanded="false"}}
376 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
377 +**Date of Publication:** *2014*
378 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
379 +**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
380 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
381 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
382 +
383 +---
384 +
385 +## **Key Statistics**
298 298  1. **General Observations:**
299 - - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
300 - - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
387 + - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
388 + - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
301 301  
302 302  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
303 - - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
304 - - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
391 + - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
392 + - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
305 305  
306 306  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
307 - - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
308 - - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
395 + - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
396 + - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
309 309  
310 ------
398 +---
311 311  
312 -## **Findings**##
313 -
400 +## **Findings**
314 314  1. **Primary Observations:**
315 - - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
316 - - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
402 + - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
403 + - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
317 317  
318 318  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
319 - - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
320 - - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
406 + - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
407 + - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
321 321  
322 322  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
323 - - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
324 - - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
410 + - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
411 + - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
325 325  
326 ------
413 +---
327 327  
328 -## **Critique and Observations**##
329 -
415 +## **Critique and Observations**
330 330  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
331 - - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
332 - - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
417 + - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
418 + - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
333 333  
334 334  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
335 - - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
336 - - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
421 + - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
422 + - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
337 337  
338 338  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
339 - - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
340 - - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
425 + - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
426 + - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
341 341  
342 ------
428 +---
343 343  
344 344  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
345 -- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
346 -- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
347 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
431 +- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
432 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
433 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
348 348  
349 ------
435 +---
350 350  
351 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
437 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
438 +1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
439 +2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
440 +3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
352 352  
353 -1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
354 -2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
355 -3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
442 +---
356 356  
357 ------
358 -
359 359  ## **Summary of Research Study**
360 -This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
445 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.
361 361  
362 362  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
363 363  
364 ------
449 +---
365 365  
366 366  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
367 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
452 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
453 +
368 368  {{/expand}}
369 369  
456 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
370 370  
371 -== Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA ==
458 +{{expand title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation" expanded="false"}}
459 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
460 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
461 +**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
462 +**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
463 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
464 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
372 372  
373 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
374 -**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
375 -**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
376 -**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
377 -**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
378 -**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
379 -**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
466 +---
380 380  
381 ------
382 -
383 -## **Key Statistics**##
384 -
468 +## **Key Statistics**
385 385  1. **General Observations:**
386 - - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
387 - - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
470 + - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
471 + - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
388 388  
389 389  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
390 - - Examines **West Eurasian populations** and their genetic evolution.
391 - - Tracks **changes in allele frequencies over millennia**.
474 + - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
475 + - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
392 392  
393 393  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
394 - - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
395 - - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
478 + - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
479 + - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
396 396  
397 ------
481 +---
398 398  
399 -## **Findings**##
400 -
483 +## **Findings**
401 401  1. **Primary Observations:**
402 - - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
403 - - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
485 + - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
486 + - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
404 404  
405 405  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
406 - - Selection pressure on **energy storage genes** supports the **Thrifty Gene Hypothesis**.
407 - - **Cognitive performance-related alleles** have undergone selection, but their historical advantages remain unclear.
489 + - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
490 + - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
408 408  
409 409  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
410 - - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
411 - - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
412 - - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
493 + - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
494 + - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
413 413  
414 ------
496 +---
415 415  
416 -## **Critique and Observations**##
417 -
498 +## **Critique and Observations**
418 418  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
419 - - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
420 - - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
500 + - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
501 + - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
421 421  
422 422  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
423 - - Findings **may not translate directly** to modern populations.
424 - - **Unclear whether observed selection pressures persist today**.
504 + - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
505 + - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
425 425  
426 426  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
427 - - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
428 - - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
508 + - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
509 + - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
429 429  
430 ------
511 +---
431 431  
432 432  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
433 -- Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
434 -- Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
435 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
514 +- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
515 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
516 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
436 436  
437 ------
518 +---
438 438  
439 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
520 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
521 +1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
522 +2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
523 +3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
440 440  
441 -1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
442 -2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
443 -3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
525 +---
444 444  
445 ------
446 -
447 447  ## **Summary of Research Study**
448 -This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
528 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.
449 449  
450 ------
530 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
451 451  
532 +---
533 +
452 452  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
453 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
535 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
536 +
454 454  {{/expand}}
455 455  
539 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
456 456  
457 -== Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age ==
541 +{{expand title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media" expanded="false"}}
542 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
543 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
544 +**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
545 +**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
546 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
547 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
458 458  
459 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
460 -**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
461 -**Date of Publication:** *2013*
462 -**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
463 -**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
464 -**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
465 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
549 +---
466 466  
467 ------
468 -
469 -## **Key Statistics**##
470 -
551 +## **Key Statistics**
471 471  1. **General Observations:**
472 - - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
473 - - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
553 + - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
554 + - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
474 474  
475 475  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
476 - - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
477 - - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
557 + - **90% of experts were from Western countries**, and **83% were male**.
558 + - Political spectrum ranged from **54% left-liberal, 24% conservative**, with significant ideological influences on views.
478 478  
479 479  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
480 - - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
481 - - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
561 + - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
562 + - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
482 482  
483 ------
564 +---
484 484  
485 -## **Findings**##
486 -
566 +## **Findings**
487 487  1. **Primary Observations:**
488 - - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
489 - - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
568 + - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
569 + - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
490 490  
491 491  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
492 - - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
493 - - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
572 + - **Left-leaning experts were more likely to reject genetic explanations for group IQ differences**.
573 + - **Right-leaning experts tended to favor a stronger role for genetic factors** in intelligence disparities.
494 494  
495 495  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
496 - - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
497 - - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
576 + - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
577 + - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
498 498  
499 ------
579 +---
500 500  
501 -## **Critique and Observations**##
502 -
581 +## **Critique and Observations**
503 503  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
504 - - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
505 - - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
583 + - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
584 + - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
506 506  
507 507  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
508 - - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
509 - - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
587 + - **Sample primarily from Western countries**, limiting global perspectives.
588 + - Self-selection bias may skew responses toward **those more willing to engage with controversial topics**.
510 510  
511 511  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
512 - - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
513 - - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
591 + - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
592 + - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
514 514  
515 ------
594 +---
516 516  
517 517  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
518 -- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
519 -- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
520 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
597 +- Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
598 +- Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
599 +- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
521 521  
522 ------
601 +---
523 523  
524 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
603 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
604 +1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
605 +2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
606 +3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
525 525  
526 -1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
527 -2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
528 -3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
608 +---
529 529  
530 ------
531 -
532 532  ## **Summary of Research Study**
533 -This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
611 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.
534 534  
535 535  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
536 536  
537 ------
615 +---
538 538  
539 539  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
540 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
618 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
619 +
541 541  {{/expand}}
542 542  
622 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
543 543  
544 -== Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications ==
545 -
546 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
624 +{{expand title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications" expanded="false"}}
547 547  **Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
548 548  **Date of Publication:** *2010*
549 549  **Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
550 550  **Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
551 551  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
552 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
630 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
553 553  
554 ------
632 +---
555 555  
556 -## **Key Statistics**##
557 -
634 +## **Key Statistics**
558 558  1. **General Observations:**
559 559   - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
560 560   - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
... ... @@ -567,10 +567,9 @@
567 567   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
568 568   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
569 569  
570 ------
647 +---
571 571  
572 -## **Findings**##
573 -
649 +## **Findings**
574 574  1. **Primary Observations:**
575 575   - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
576 576   - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
... ... @@ -583,10 +583,9 @@
583 583   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
584 584   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
585 585  
586 ------
662 +---
587 587  
588 -## **Critique and Observations**##
589 -
664 +## **Critique and Observations**
590 590  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
591 591   - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
592 592   - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
... ... @@ -599,705 +599,798 @@
599 599   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
600 600   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
601 601  
602 ------
677 +---
603 603  
604 604  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
605 605  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
606 606  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
607 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
682 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
608 608  
609 ------
684 +---
610 610  
611 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
612 -
686 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
613 613  1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
614 614  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
615 615  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
616 616  
617 ------
691 +---
618 618  
619 619  ## **Summary of Research Study**
620 -This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
694 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.
621 621  
622 622  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
623 623  
624 ------
698 +---
625 625  
626 626  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
627 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
701 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
702 +
628 628  {{/expand}}
629 629  
705 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
630 630  
631 -== Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media ==
707 +{{expand title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age" expanded="false"}}
708 +**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
709 +**Date of Publication:** *2013*
710 +**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
711 +**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
712 +**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
713 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
632 632  
633 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
634 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
635 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
636 -**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
637 -**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
638 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
639 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
715 +---
640 640  
641 ------
642 -
643 -## **Key Statistics**##
644 -
717 +## **Key Statistics**
645 645  1. **General Observations:**
646 - - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
647 - - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
719 + - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
720 + - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
648 648  
649 649  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
650 - - **90% of experts were from Western countries**, and **83% were male**.
651 - - Political spectrum ranged from **54% left-liberal, 24% conservative**, with significant ideological influences on views.
723 + - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
724 + - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
652 652  
653 653  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
654 - - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
655 - - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
727 + - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
728 + - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
656 656  
657 ------
730 +---
658 658  
659 -## **Findings**##
660 -
732 +## **Findings**
661 661  1. **Primary Observations:**
662 - - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
663 - - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
734 + - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
735 + - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
664 664  
665 665  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
666 - - **Left-leaning experts were more likely to reject genetic explanations for group IQ differences**.
667 - - **Right-leaning experts tended to favor a stronger role for genetic factors** in intelligence disparities.
738 + - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
739 + - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
668 668  
669 669  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
670 - - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
671 - - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
742 + - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
743 + - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
672 672  
673 ------
745 +---
674 674  
675 -## **Critique and Observations**##
676 -
747 +## **Critique and Observations**
677 677  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
678 - - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
679 - - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
749 + - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
750 + - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
680 680  
681 681  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
682 - - **Sample primarily from Western countries**, limiting global perspectives.
683 - - Self-selection bias may skew responses toward **those more willing to engage with controversial topics**.
753 + - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
754 + - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
684 684  
685 685  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
686 - - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
687 - - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
757 + - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
758 + - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
688 688  
689 ------
760 +---
690 690  
691 691  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
692 -- Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
693 -- Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
694 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
763 +- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
764 +- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
765 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
695 695  
696 ------
767 +---
697 697  
698 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
769 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
770 +1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
771 +2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
772 +3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
699 699  
700 -1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
701 -2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
702 -3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
774 +---
703 703  
704 ------
705 -
706 706  ## **Summary of Research Study**
707 -This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
777 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.
708 708  
709 709  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
710 710  
711 ------
781 +---
712 712  
713 713  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
714 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
784 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
785 +
715 715  {{/expand}}
716 716  
788 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
717 717  
718 -== Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation ==
790 +{{expand title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports" expanded="false"}}
791 +**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
792 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
793 +**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
794 +**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
795 +**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
796 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
719 719  
720 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
721 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
722 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
723 -**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
724 -**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
725 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
726 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
798 +---
727 727  
728 ------
800 +## **Key Statistics**
801 +1. **General Observations:**
802 + - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
803 + - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
729 729  
730 -## **Key Statistics**##
805 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
806 + - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
807 + - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
731 731  
809 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
810 + - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
811 + - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
812 +
813 +---
814 +
815 +## **Findings**
816 +1. **Primary Observations:**
817 + - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
818 + - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
819 +
820 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
821 + - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
822 + - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
823 +
824 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
825 + - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
826 + - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
827 +
828 +---
829 +
830 +## **Critique and Observations**
831 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
832 + - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
833 + - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
834 +
835 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
836 + - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
837 + - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
838 +
839 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
840 + - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
841 + - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
842 +
843 +---
844 +
845 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
846 +- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
847 +- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
848 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
849 +
850 +---
851 +
852 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
853 +1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
854 +2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
855 +3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
856 +
857 +---
858 +
859 +## **Summary of Research Study**
860 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.
861 +
862 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
863 +
864 +---
865 +
866 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
867 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
868 +
869 +{{/expand}}
870 +
871 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
872 +
873 +{{expand title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History" expanded="false"}}
874 +**Source:** *Nature*
875 +**Date of Publication:** *2009*
876 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
877 +**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
878 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
879 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*
880 +
881 +---
882 +
883 +## **Key Statistics**
732 732  1. **General Observations:**
733 - - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
734 - - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
885 + - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
886 + - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
735 735  
736 736  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
737 - - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
738 - - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
889 + - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
890 + - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
739 739  
740 740  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
741 - - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
742 - - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
893 + - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
894 + - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
743 743  
744 ------
896 +---
745 745  
746 -## **Findings**##
747 -
898 +## **Findings**
748 748  1. **Primary Observations:**
749 - - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
750 - - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
900 + - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
901 + - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
751 751  
752 752  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
753 - - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
754 - - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
904 + - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
905 + - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
755 755  
756 756  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
757 - - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
758 - - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
908 + - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
909 + - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
759 759  
760 ------
911 +---
761 761  
762 -## **Critique and Observations**##
763 -
913 +## **Critique and Observations**
764 764  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
765 - - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
766 - - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
915 + - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
916 + - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
767 767  
768 768  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
769 - - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
770 - - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
919 + - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
920 + - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
771 771  
772 772  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
773 - - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
774 - - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
923 + - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
924 + - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
775 775  
776 ------
926 +---
777 777  
778 778  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
779 -- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
780 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
781 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
929 +- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
930 +- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
931 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
782 782  
783 ------
933 +---
784 784  
785 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
935 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
936 +1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
937 +2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
938 +3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
786 786  
787 -1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
788 -2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
789 -3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
940 +---
790 790  
791 ------
792 -
793 793  ## **Summary of Research Study**
794 -This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.  ##
943 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.
795 795  
796 796  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
797 797  
798 ------
947 +---
799 799  
800 800  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
801 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
950 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
951 +
802 802  {{/expand}}
803 803  
954 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
804 804  
805 -== Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding ==
806 806  
807 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
808 -**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
809 -**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
810 -**Author(s):** Smith et al.
811 -**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
812 -**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
813 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Scienc
957 +{{expand title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations" expanded="false"}}
958 +**Source:** *Nature*
959 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
960 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
961 +**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
962 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
963 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
814 814  
815 -**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
965 +---
816 816  
817 -=== **Key Statistics** ===
818 -
967 +## **Key Statistics**
819 819  1. **General Observations:**
820 - - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
821 - - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
969 + - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
970 + - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
822 822  
823 823  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
824 - - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
825 - - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
973 + - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
974 + - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
826 826  
827 -=== **Findings** ===
976 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
977 + - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
978 + - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
828 828  
829 -- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
830 -- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
980 +---
831 831  
832 -=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
982 +## **Findings**
983 +1. **Primary Observations:**
984 + - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
985 + - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
833 833  
834 -- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
835 -- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
836 -{{/expand}}
987 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
988 + - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
989 + - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
837 837  
991 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
992 + - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
993 + - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
838 838  
839 ------
995 +---
840 840  
841 -= Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
997 +## **Critique and Observations**
998 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
999 + - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
1000 + - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
842 842  
1002 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1003 + - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
1004 + - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
843 843  
844 -== Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018 ==
1006 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1007 + - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
1008 + - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
845 845  
846 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
847 -**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
848 -**Date of Publication:** *2020*
849 -**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
850 -**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
851 -**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
852 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
1010 +---
853 853  
854 ------
1012 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1013 +- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
1014 +- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
1015 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
855 855  
856 -## **Key Statistics**##
1017 +---
857 857  
1019 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1020 +1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
1021 +2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
1022 +3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
1023 +
1024 +---
1025 +
1026 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1027 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.
1028 +
1029 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1030 +
1031 +---
1032 +
1033 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1034 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
1035 +
1036 +{{/expand}}
1037 +
1038 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1039 +
1040 +{{expand title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies" expanded="false"}}
1041 +**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
1042 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1043 +**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
1044 +**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
1045 +**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
1046 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
1047 +
1048 +---
1049 +
1050 +## **Key Statistics**
858 858  1. **General Observations:**
859 - - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
860 - - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
1052 + - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
1053 + - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
861 861  
862 862  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
863 - - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
864 - - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
1056 + - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
1057 + - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
865 865  
866 866  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
867 - - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
868 - - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
1060 + - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
1061 + - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
869 869  
870 ------
1063 +---
871 871  
872 -## **Findings**##
873 -
1065 +## **Findings**
874 874  1. **Primary Observations:**
875 - - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
876 - - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
1067 + - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
1068 + - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
877 877  
878 878  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
879 - - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
880 - - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
1071 + - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (~70-80%)**.
1072 + - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
881 881  
882 882  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
883 - - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
884 - - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
1075 + - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
1076 + - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
885 885  
886 ------
1078 +---
887 887  
888 -## **Critique and Observations**##
889 -
1080 +## **Critique and Observations**
890 890  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
891 - - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
892 - - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
1082 + - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
1083 + - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
893 893  
894 894  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
895 - - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
896 - - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
1086 + - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
1087 + - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
897 897  
898 898  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
899 - - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
900 - - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
1090 + - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
1091 + - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
901 901  
902 ------
1093 +---
903 903  
904 904  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
905 -- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
906 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
1096 +- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
1097 +- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
1098 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
907 907  
908 ------
1100 +---
909 909  
910 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1102 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1103 +1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
1104 +2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
1105 +3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
911 911  
912 -1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
913 -2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
1107 +---
914 914  
915 ------
916 -
917 917  ## **Summary of Research Study**
918 -This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior ##
1110 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.
919 919  
920 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1112 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studys contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
921 921  
922 ------
1114 +---
923 923  
924 924  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
925 -{{velocity}}
926 -#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
927 -#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
928 -#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
929 -[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
930 -#else
931 -{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
932 -#end {{/velocity}}##
1117 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
1118 +
933 933  {{/expand}}
934 934  
1121 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
935 935  
936 -== Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ==
1123 +{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}}
1124 +**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
1125 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1126 +**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
1127 +**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
1128 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
1129 +**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*
937 937  
938 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
939 -**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
940 -**Date of Publication:** *2012*
941 -**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
942 -**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
943 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
944 -**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
1131 +---
945 945  
946 ------
947 -
948 -## **Key Statistics**##
949 -
1133 +## **Key Statistics**
950 950  1. **General Observations:**
951 - - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
952 - - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
1135 + - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
1136 + - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
953 953  
954 954  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
955 - - **Maternal race had a stronger influence than paternal race** on birth outcomes.
956 - - **Black mother–White father (BMWF) couples** had a higher risk than **White mother–Black father (WMBF) couples**.
1139 + - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
1140 + - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
957 957  
958 958  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
959 - - **Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for key outcomes:**
960 - - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
961 - - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
962 - - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
1143 + - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
1144 + - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
963 963  
964 ------
1146 +---
965 965  
966 -## **Findings**##
967 -
1148 +## **Findings**
968 968  1. **Primary Observations:**
969 - - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
970 - - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
1150 + - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
1151 + - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
971 971  
972 972  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
973 - - **Black mothers (regardless of paternal race) had the highest risk of LBW and PTB**.
974 - - **White mothers with Black fathers had a lower risk** than Black mothers with White fathers.
1154 + - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
1155 + - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
975 975  
976 976  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
977 - - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
978 - - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
1158 + - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
1159 + - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
979 979  
980 ------
1161 +---
981 981  
982 -## **Critique and Observations**##
983 -
1163 +## **Critique and Observations**
984 984  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
985 - - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
986 - - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
1165 + - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
1166 + - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
987 987  
988 988  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
989 - - Data limited to **Black-White biracial couples**, excluding other racial groups.
990 - - **Socioeconomic and healthcare access factors** not fully explored.
1169 + - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
1170 + - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
991 991  
992 992  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
993 - - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
994 - - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
1173 + - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
1174 + - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
995 995  
996 ------
1176 +---
997 997  
998 998  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
999 -- Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
1000 -- Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
1001 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
1179 +- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
1180 +- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
1181 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
1002 1002  
1003 ------
1183 +---
1004 1004  
1005 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1185 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1186 +1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
1187 +2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
1188 +3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
1006 1006  
1007 -1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
1008 -2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
1009 -3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
1190 +---
1010 1010  
1011 ------
1012 -
1013 1013  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1014 -This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
1193 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.
1015 1015  
1016 ------
1195 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1017 1017  
1197 +---
1198 +
1018 1018  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1019 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
1200 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
1201 +
1020 1020  {{/expand}}
1021 1021  
1204 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1022 1022  
1023 -== Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness ==
1024 1024  
1025 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
1026 -**Source:** *Current Psychology*
1027 -**Date of Publication:** *2024*
1028 -**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
1029 -**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
1030 -**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
1031 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
1032 1032  
1033 ------
1208 +{{expand title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations" expanded="false"}}
1209 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1210 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1211 +**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1212 +**Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1213 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1214 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1034 1034  
1035 -## **Key Statistics**##
1216 +---
1036 1036  
1218 +## **Key Statistics**
1037 1037  1. **General Observations:**
1038 - - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
1039 - - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
1220 + - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1221 + - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
1040 1040  
1041 1041  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1042 - - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
1043 - - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
1224 + - **50% of medical students surveyed endorsed at least one false belief about biological differences**.
1225 + - Participants who held these false beliefs were **more likely to underestimate Black patients pain levels**.
1044 1044  
1045 1045  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1046 - - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
1047 - - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
1228 + - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1229 + - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1048 1048  
1049 ------
1231 +---
1050 1050  
1051 -## **Findings**##
1052 -
1233 +## **Findings**
1053 1053  1. **Primary Observations:**
1054 - - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
1055 - - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
1235 + - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1236 + - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
1056 1056  
1057 1057  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1058 - - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
1059 - - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
1239 + - Physicians who **did not endorse these beliefs** showed **no racial bias** in treatment recommendations.
1240 + - Bias was **strongest among first-year medical students** and decreased slightly in later years of training.
1060 1060  
1061 1061  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1062 - - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
1063 - - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
1243 + - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1244 + - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1064 1064  
1065 ------
1246 +---
1066 1066  
1067 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1068 -
1248 +## **Critique and Observations**
1069 1069  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1070 - - **First quantitative study** on incels social isolation and mental health.
1071 - - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
1250 + - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1251 + - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
1072 1072  
1073 1073  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1074 - - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
1075 - - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
1254 + - The study focuses on **Black vs. white disparities**, leaving other racial/ethnic groups unexplored.
1255 + - Participants' responses were based on **hypothetical medical cases, not real-world treatment decisions**.
1076 1076  
1077 1077  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1078 - - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
1079 - - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
1258 + - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1259 + - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1080 1080  
1081 ------
1261 +---
1082 1082  
1083 1083  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1084 -- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
1085 -- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
1086 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
1264 +- Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1265 +- Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1266 +- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1087 1087  
1088 ------
1268 +---
1089 1089  
1090 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1270 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1271 +1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1272 +2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1273 +3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1091 1091  
1092 -1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
1093 -2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
1094 -3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
1275 +---
1095 1095  
1096 ------
1097 -
1098 1098  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1099 -This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
1278 +This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.
1100 1100  
1101 1101  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1102 1102  
1103 ------
1282 +---
1104 1104  
1105 1105  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1106 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
1285 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1286 +
1107 1107  {{/expand}}
1108 1108  
1289 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1109 1109  
1110 -= Crime and Substance Abuse =
1111 1111  
1292 +{{expand title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans" expanded="false"}}
1293 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1294 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1295 +**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1296 +**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1297 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1298 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1112 1112  
1113 -== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1300 +---
1114 1114  
1115 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1116 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1117 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1118 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1119 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1120 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1121 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1122 -
1123 ------
1124 -
1125 -## **Key Statistics**##
1126 -
1302 +## **Key Statistics**
1127 1127  1. **General Observations:**
1128 - - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1129 - - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1304 + - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1305 + - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
1130 1130  
1131 1131  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1132 - - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1133 - - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1308 + - The increase was **most pronounced among those with a high school education or less**.
1309 + - Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic mortality continued to decline over the same period.
1134 1134  
1135 1135  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1136 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1137 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1312 + - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1313 + - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1138 1138  
1139 ------
1315 +---
1140 1140  
1141 -## **Findings**##
1142 -
1317 +## **Findings**
1143 1143  1. **Primary Observations:**
1144 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1145 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1319 + - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1320 + - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
1146 1146  
1147 1147  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1148 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1149 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1323 + - The **largest mortality increases** occurred among **whites without a college degree**.
1324 + - Chronic pain, functional limitations, and self-reported mental distress **rose significantly in affected groups**.
1150 1150  
1151 1151  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1152 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1153 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1327 + - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1328 + - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1154 1154  
1155 ------
1330 +---
1156 1156  
1157 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1158 -
1332 +## **Critique and Observations**
1159 1159  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1160 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1161 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1334 + - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1335 + - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
1162 1162  
1163 1163  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1164 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1165 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1338 + - Does not establish **causality** between economic decline and increased mortality.
1339 + - Lacks **granular data on opioid prescribing patterns and regional differences**.
1166 1166  
1167 1167  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1168 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1169 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1342 + - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1343 + - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1170 1170  
1171 ------
1345 +---
1172 1172  
1173 1173  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1174 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1175 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1176 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1348 +- Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1349 +- Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1350 +- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1177 1177  
1178 ------
1352 +---
1179 1179  
1180 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1354 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1355 +1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1356 +2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1357 +3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1181 1181  
1182 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1183 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1184 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1359 +---
1185 1185  
1186 ------
1187 -
1188 1188  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1189 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1362 +This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.
1190 1190  
1191 1191  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1192 1192  
1193 ------
1366 +---
1194 1194  
1195 1195  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1196 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1369 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1370 +
1197 1197  {{/expand}}
1198 1198  
1373 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1199 1199  
1200 -== Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1375 +{{expand title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?" expanded="false"}}
1376 +**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1377 +**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1378 +**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1379 +**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1380 +**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1381 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1201 1201  
1202 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1203 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1204 -**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1205 -**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1206 -**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1207 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1208 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1383 +---
1209 1209  
1210 ------
1211 -
1212 -## **Key Statistics**##
1213 -
1385 +## **Key Statistics**
1214 1214  1. **General Observations:**
1215 - - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1216 - - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1387 + - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1388 + - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
1217 1217  
1218 1218  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1219 - - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1220 - - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1391 + - Explores differences in **integration, social interactions, and perceptions of diversity**.
1392 + - Studies how **class, education, and neighborhood composition** affect adaptation to urban diversity.
1221 1221  
1222 1222  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1223 - - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1224 - - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1395 + - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1396 + - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1225 1225  
1226 ------
1398 +---
1227 1227  
1228 -## **Findings**##
1229 -
1400 +## **Findings**
1230 1230  1. **Primary Observations:**
1231 - - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1232 - - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1402 + - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1403 + - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
1233 1233  
1234 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1235 - - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1236 - - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1405 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1406 + - Young, educated individuals in urban areas **are more open to cultural diversity**.
1407 + - Older and less mobile residents **report feelings of displacement and social isolation**.
1237 1237  
1238 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1239 - - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1240 - - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1409 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1410 + - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1411 + - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1241 1241  
1242 ------
1413 +---
1243 1243  
1244 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1415 +## **Critique and Observations**
1416 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1417 + - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1418 + - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
1245 1245  
1246 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1247 - - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1248 - - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1420 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1421 + - Limited to **Western European urban settings**, missing perspectives from other global regions.
1422 + - Does not fully explore **policy interventions for fostering social cohesion**.
1249 1249  
1250 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1251 - - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1252 - - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1424 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1425 + - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1426 + - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1253 1253  
1254 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1255 - - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1256 - - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1428 +---
1257 1257  
1258 ------
1259 -
1260 1260  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1261 -- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1262 -- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1263 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1431 +- Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1432 +- Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1433 +- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1264 1264  
1265 ------
1435 +---
1266 1266  
1267 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1437 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1438 +1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1439 +2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1440 +3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1268 1268  
1269 -1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1270 -2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1271 -3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1442 +---
1272 1272  
1273 ------
1274 -
1275 1275  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1276 -This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
1445 +This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.
1277 1277  
1278 1278  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1279 1279  
1280 ------
1449 +---
1281 1281  
1282 1282  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1283 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
1452 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1453 +
1284 1284  {{/expand}}
1285 1285  
1456 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1286 1286  
1287 -== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1288 -
1289 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1458 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1290 1290  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1291 1291  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
1292 1292  **Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1293 1293  **Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1294 1294  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1295 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1464 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1296 1296  
1297 ------
1466 +---
1298 1298  
1299 -## **Key Statistics**##
1300 -
1468 +## **Key Statistics**
1301 1301  1. **General Observations:**
1302 1302   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1303 1303   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -1310,10 +1310,9 @@
1310 1310   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1311 1311   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1312 1312  
1313 ------
1481 +---
1314 1314  
1315 -## **Findings**##
1316 -
1483 +## **Findings**
1317 1317  1. **Primary Observations:**
1318 1318   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1319 1319   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -1326,10 +1326,9 @@
1326 1326   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1327 1327   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1328 1328  
1329 ------
1496 +---
1330 1330  
1331 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1332 -
1498 +## **Critique and Observations**
1333 1333  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1334 1334   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1335 1335   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1342,641 +1342,625 @@
1342 1342   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1343 1343   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1344 1344  
1345 ------
1511 +---
1346 1346  
1347 1347  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1348 1348  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1349 1349  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1350 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1516 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1351 1351  
1352 ------
1518 +---
1353 1353  
1354 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1355 -
1520 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1356 1356  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1357 1357  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1358 1358  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1359 1359  
1360 ------
1525 +---
1361 1361  
1362 1362  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1363 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1528 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1364 1364  
1365 1365  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1366 1366  
1367 ------
1532 +---
1368 1368  
1369 1369  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1370 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1535 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1536 +
1371 1371  {{/expand}}
1372 1372  
1539 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1373 1373  
1374 -== Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults ==
1375 1375  
1376 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1377 - Source: Addictive Behaviors
1378 -Date of Publication: 2016
1379 -Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
1380 -Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
1381 -DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
1382 -Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
1542 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1543 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1544 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1545 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1546 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1547 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1548 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1383 1383  
1384 -Key Statistics
1385 -General Observations:
1550 +---
1386 1386  
1387 -Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
1388 -Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
1389 -Subgroup Analysis:
1552 +## **Key Statistics**
1553 +1. **General Observations:**
1554 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1555 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1390 1390  
1391 -Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
1392 -Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
1393 -Other Significant Data Points:
1557 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1558 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1559 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1394 1394  
1395 -Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
1396 -Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
1397 -Findings
1398 -Primary Observations:
1561 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1562 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1563 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1399 1399  
1400 -Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
1401 -Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
1402 -Subgroup Trends:
1565 +---
1403 1403  
1404 -Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
1405 -College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
1406 -Specific Case Analysis:
1567 +## **Findings**
1568 +1. **Primary Observations:**
1569 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1570 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1407 1407  
1408 -Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
1409 -Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
1410 -Critique and Observations
1411 -Strengths of the Study:
1572 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1573 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1574 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1412 1412  
1413 -Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
1414 -Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
1415 -Limitations of the Study:
1576 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1577 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1578 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1416 1416  
1417 -Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
1418 -Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
1419 -Suggestions for Improvement:
1580 +---
1420 1420  
1421 -Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
1422 -Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
1423 -Relevance to Subproject
1424 -Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
1425 -Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
1426 -Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
1427 -Suggestions for Further Exploration
1428 -Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
1429 -Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
1430 -Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
1431 -Summary of Research Study
1432 -This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
1582 +## **Critique and Observations**
1583 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1584 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1585 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1433 1433  
1587 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1588 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1589 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1590 +
1591 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1592 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1593 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1594 +
1595 +---
1596 +
1597 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1598 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1599 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1600 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1601 +
1602 +---
1603 +
1604 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1605 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1606 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1607 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1608 +
1609 +---
1610 +
1611 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1612 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1613 +
1434 1434  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1435 1435  
1436 -📄 Download Full Study
1437 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
1438 -{{/expand}}
1616 +---
1439 1439  
1618 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1619 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1440 1440  
1441 -== Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time? ==
1621 +{{/expand}}
1442 1442  
1443 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1444 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1445 -**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1446 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1447 -**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1448 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1449 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1623 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1450 1450  
1451 ------
1625 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1626 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1627 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1628 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1629 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1630 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1631 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1452 1452  
1453 -## **Key Statistics**##
1633 +---
1454 1454  
1635 +## **Key Statistics**
1455 1455  1. **General Observations:**
1456 - - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1457 - - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
1637 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1638 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1458 1458  
1459 1459  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1460 - - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
1461 - - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
1641 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1642 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1462 1462  
1463 1463  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1464 - - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1465 - - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1645 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1646 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1466 1466  
1467 ------
1648 +---
1468 1468  
1469 -## **Findings**##
1470 -
1650 +## **Findings**
1471 1471  1. **Primary Observations:**
1472 - - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1473 - - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
1652 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1653 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1474 1474  
1475 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1476 - - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
1477 - - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
1655 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1656 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1657 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1478 1478  
1479 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1480 - - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1481 - - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1659 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1660 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1661 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1482 1482  
1483 ------
1663 +---
1484 1484  
1485 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1665 +## **Critique and Observations**
1666 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1667 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1668 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1486 1486  
1487 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1488 - - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1489 - - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
1670 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1671 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1672 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1490 1490  
1491 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1492 - - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
1493 - - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
1674 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1675 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1676 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1494 1494  
1495 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1496 - - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1497 - - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1678 +---
1498 1498  
1499 ------
1500 -
1501 1501  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1502 -- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1503 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1504 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1681 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1682 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1683 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1505 1505  
1506 ------
1685 +---
1507 1507  
1508 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1687 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1688 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1689 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1690 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1509 1509  
1510 -1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1511 -2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1512 -3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1692 +---
1513 1513  
1514 ------
1515 -
1516 1516  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1517 -This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.  ##
1695 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1518 1518  
1519 1519  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1520 1520  
1521 ------
1699 +---
1522 1522  
1523 1523  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1524 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
1702 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1703 +
1525 1525  {{/expand}}
1526 1526  
1706 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1527 1527  
1528 -= Whiteness & White Guilt =
1708 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1709 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1710 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1711 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1712 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1713 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1714 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1529 1529  
1530 -== Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports ==
1716 +---
1531 1531  
1532 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1533 -**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1534 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1535 -**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1536 -**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1537 -**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1538 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1539 -
1540 ------
1541 -
1542 -## **Key Statistics**##
1543 -
1718 +## **Key Statistics**
1544 1544  1. **General Observations:**
1545 - - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1546 - - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
1720 + - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1721 + - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1547 1547  
1548 1548  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1549 - - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
1550 - - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
1724 + - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1725 + - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1551 1551  
1552 1552  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1553 - - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1554 - - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1728 + - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1729 + - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1555 1555  
1556 ------
1731 +---
1557 1557  
1558 -## **Findings**##
1559 -
1733 +## **Findings**
1560 1560  1. **Primary Observations:**
1561 - - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1562 - - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
1735 + - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1736 + - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1563 1563  
1564 1564  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1565 - - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
1566 - - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
1739 + - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1740 + - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1567 1567  
1568 1568  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1569 - - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1570 - - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1743 + - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1744 + - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1571 1571  
1572 ------
1746 +---
1573 1573  
1574 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1575 -
1748 +## **Critique and Observations**
1576 1576  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1577 - - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1578 - - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
1750 + - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1751 + - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1579 1579  
1580 1580  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1581 - - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
1582 - - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
1754 + - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1755 + - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1583 1583  
1584 1584  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1585 - - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1586 - - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1758 + - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1759 + - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1587 1587  
1588 ------
1761 +---
1589 1589  
1590 1590  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1591 -- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1592 -- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1593 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1764 +- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1765 +- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1766 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1594 1594  
1595 ------
1768 +---
1596 1596  
1597 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1770 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1771 +1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1772 +2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1773 +3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1598 1598  
1599 -1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1600 -2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1601 -3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1775 +---
1602 1602  
1603 ------
1604 -
1605 1605  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1606 -This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
1778 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1607 1607  
1608 1608  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1609 1609  
1610 ------
1782 +---
1611 1611  
1612 1612  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1613 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
1785 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1786 +
1614 1614  {{/expand}}
1615 1615  
1789 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1616 1616  
1617 -== Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations ==
1791 +{{expand title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict" expanded="false"}}
1792 +**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1793 +**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1794 +**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1795 +**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1796 +**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1797 +**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*
1618 1618  
1619 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1620 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1621 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1622 -**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1623 -**Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1624 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1625 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1799 +---
1626 1626  
1627 ------
1628 -
1629 -## **Key Statistics**##
1630 -
1801 +## **Key Statistics**
1631 1631  1. **General Observations:**
1632 - - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1633 - - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
1803 + - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1804 + - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
1634 1634  
1635 1635  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1636 - - **50% of medical students surveyed endorsed at least one false belief about biological differences**.
1637 - - Participants who held these false beliefs were **more likely to underestimate Black patients’ pain levels**.
1807 + - **Anonymity and reduced social cues** in CMC increased hostility.
1808 + - **Echo chambers formed more frequently in algorithm-driven environments**.
1638 1638  
1639 1639  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1640 - - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1641 - - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1811 + - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1812 + - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1642 1642  
1643 ------
1814 +---
1644 1644  
1645 -## **Findings**##
1646 -
1816 +## **Findings**
1647 1647  1. **Primary Observations:**
1648 - - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1649 - - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
1818 + - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1819 + - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
1650 1650  
1651 1651  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1652 - - Physicians who **did not endorse these beliefs** showed **no racial bias** in treatment recommendations.
1653 - - Bias was **strongest among first-year medical students** and decreased slightly in later years of training.
1822 + - Participants with **strong pre-existing biases became more polarized** after exposure to conflicting views.
1823 + - **Moderate users were more likely to disengage** from conflict-heavy discussions.
1654 1654  
1655 1655  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1656 - - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1657 - - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1826 + - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1827 + - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1658 1658  
1659 ------
1829 +---
1660 1660  
1661 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1662 -
1831 +## **Critique and Observations**
1663 1663  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1664 - - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1665 - - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
1833 + - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1834 + - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
1666 1666  
1667 1667  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1668 - - The study focuses on **Black vs. white disparities**, leaving other racial/ethnic groups unexplored.
1669 - - Participants' responses were based on **hypothetical medical cases, not real-world treatment decisions**.
1837 + - Lacks **qualitative analysis of user motivations**.
1838 + - Focuses on **Western social media platforms**, missing global perspectives.
1670 1670  
1671 1671  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1672 - - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1673 - - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1841 + - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1842 + - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1674 1674  
1675 ------
1844 +---
1676 1676  
1677 1677  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1678 -- Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1679 -- Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1680 -- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1847 +- Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
1848 +- Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1849 +- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
1681 1681  
1682 ------
1851 +---
1683 1683  
1684 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1853 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1854 +1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
1855 +2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1856 +3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1685 1685  
1686 -1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1687 -2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1688 -3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1858 +---
1689 1689  
1690 ------
1691 -
1692 1692  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1693 -This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
1861 +This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.
1694 1694  
1695 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1863 +---
1696 1696  
1697 ------
1698 -
1699 1699  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1700 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
1866 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
1867 +
1701 1701  {{/expand}}
1702 1702  
1870 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1703 1703  
1704 -== Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans ==
1705 1705  
1706 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1707 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1708 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1709 -**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1710 -**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1711 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1712 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1873 +{{expand title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion" expanded="false"}}
1874 +**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
1875 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1876 +**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
1877 +**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
1878 +**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
1879 +**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*
1713 1713  
1714 ------
1881 +---
1715 1715  
1716 -## **Key Statistics**##
1717 -
1883 +## **Key Statistics**
1718 1718  1. **General Observations:**
1719 - - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1720 - - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
1885 + - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
1886 + - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
1721 1721  
1722 1722  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1723 - - The increase was **most pronounced among those with a high school education or less**.
1724 - - Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic mortality continued to decline over the same period.
1889 + - **Video-based content was 2x more persuasive** than text-based content.
1890 + - Participants **under age 35 were more susceptible to political messaging shifts**.
1725 1725  
1726 1726  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1727 - - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1728 - - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1893 + - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
1894 + - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
1729 1729  
1730 ------
1896 +---
1731 1731  
1732 -## **Findings**##
1733 -
1898 +## **Findings**
1734 1734  1. **Primary Observations:**
1735 - - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1736 - - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
1900 + - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
1901 + - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
1737 1737  
1738 1738  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1739 - - The **largest mortality increases** occurred among **whites without a college degree**.
1740 - - Chronic pain, functional limitations, and self-reported mental distress **rose significantly in affected groups**.
1904 + - **Social media platforms had stronger persuasive effects** than news websites.
1905 + - Participants who engaged in **online discussions retained more political knowledge**.
1741 1741  
1742 1742  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1743 - - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1744 - - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1908 + - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
1909 + - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
1745 1745  
1746 ------
1911 +---
1747 1747  
1748 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1749 -
1913 +## **Critique and Observations**
1750 1750  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1751 - - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1752 - - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
1915 + - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
1916 + - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
1753 1753  
1754 1754  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1755 - - Does not establish **causality** between economic decline and increased mortality.
1756 - - Lacks **granular data on opioid prescribing patterns and regional differences**.
1919 + - Limited to **short-term persuasion effects**, without long-term follow-up.
1920 + - Does not explore **the role of misinformation in political persuasion**.
1757 1757  
1758 1758  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1759 - - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1760 - - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1923 + - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
1924 + - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
1761 1761  
1762 ------
1926 +---
1763 1763  
1764 1764  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1765 -- Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1766 -- Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1767 -- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1929 +- Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
1930 +- Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
1931 +- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
1768 1768  
1769 ------
1933 +---
1770 1770  
1771 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1935 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1936 +1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
1937 +2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
1938 +3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
1772 1772  
1773 -1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1774 -2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1775 -3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1940 +---
1776 1776  
1777 ------
1778 -
1779 1779  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1780 -This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
1943 +This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.
1781 1781  
1782 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1945 +---
1783 1783  
1784 ------
1785 -
1786 1786  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1787 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
1948 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
1949 +
1788 1788  {{/expand}}
1789 1789  
1952 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1790 1790  
1791 -== Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities? ==
1954 +{{expand title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA" expanded="false"}}
1955 +**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
1956 +**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
1957 +**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
1958 +**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
1959 +**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
1960 +**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*
1792 1792  
1793 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1794 -**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1795 -**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1796 -**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1797 -**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1798 -**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1799 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1962 +---
1800 1800  
1801 ------
1802 -
1803 -## **Key Statistics**##
1804 -
1964 +## **Key Statistics**
1805 1805  1. **General Observations:**
1806 - - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1807 - - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
1966 + - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
1967 + - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
1808 1808  
1809 1809  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1810 - - Explores differences in **integration, social interactions, and perceptions of diversity**.
1811 - - Studies how **class, education, and neighborhood composition** affect adaptation to urban diversity.
1970 + - Examines **West Eurasian populations** and their genetic evolution.
1971 + - Tracks **changes in allele frequencies over millennia**.
1812 1812  
1813 1813  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1814 - - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1815 - - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1974 + - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
1975 + - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
1816 1816  
1817 ------
1977 +---
1818 1818  
1819 -## **Findings**##
1820 -
1979 +## **Findings**
1821 1821  1. **Primary Observations:**
1822 - - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1823 - - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
1981 + - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
1982 + - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
1824 1824  
1825 1825  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1826 - - Young, educated individuals in urban areas **are more open to cultural diversity**.
1827 - - Older and less mobile residents **report feelings of displacement and social isolation**.
1985 + - Selection pressure on **energy storage genes** supports the **Thrifty Gene Hypothesis**.
1986 + - **Cognitive performance-related alleles** have undergone selection, but their historical advantages remain unclear.
1828 1828  
1829 1829  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1830 - - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1831 - - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1989 + - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
1990 + - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
1991 + - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
1832 1832  
1833 ------
1993 +---
1834 1834  
1835 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1836 -
1995 +## **Critique and Observations**
1837 1837  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1838 - - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1839 - - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
1997 + - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
1998 + - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
1840 1840  
1841 1841  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1842 - - Limited to **Western European urban settings**, missing perspectives from other global regions.
1843 - - Does not fully explore **policy interventions for fostering social cohesion**.
2001 + - Findings **may not translate directly** to modern populations.
2002 + - **Unclear whether observed selection pressures persist today**.
1844 1844  
1845 1845  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1846 - - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1847 - - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
2005 + - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
2006 + - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
1848 1848  
1849 ------
2008 +---
1850 1850  
1851 1851  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1852 -- Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1853 -- Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1854 -- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
2011 +- Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
2012 +- Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
2013 +- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.
1855 1855  
1856 ------
2015 +---
1857 1857  
1858 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2017 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2018 +1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
2019 +2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
2020 +3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
1859 1859  
1860 -1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1861 -2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1862 -3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
2022 +---
1863 1863  
1864 ------
1865 -
1866 1866  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1867 -This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
2025 +This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.
1868 1868  
1869 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
2027 +---
1870 1870  
1871 ------
1872 -
1873 1873  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1874 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
2030 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]
2031 +
1875 1875  {{/expand}}
1876 1876  
2034 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1877 1877  
1878 -= Media =
2036 +{{expand title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" expanded="false"}}
2037 +**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
2038 +**Date of Publication:** *2012*
2039 +**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
2040 +**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
2041 +**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
2042 +**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*
1879 1879  
2044 +---
1880 1880  
1881 -== Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic ==
1882 -
1883 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"}}
1884 -**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1885 -**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1886 -**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1887 -**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1888 -**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1889 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1890 -
1891 ------
1892 -
1893 -## **Key Statistics**##
1894 -
2046 +## **Key Statistics**
1895 1895  1. **General Observations:**
1896 - - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1897 - - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
2048 + - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
2049 + - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
1898 1898  
1899 1899  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1900 - - **Anonymity and reduced social cues** in CMC increased hostility.
1901 - - **Echo chambers formed more frequently in algorithm-driven environments**.
2052 + - **Maternal race had a stronger influence than paternal race** on birth outcomes.
2053 + - **Black mother–White father (BMWF) couples** had a higher risk than **White mother–Black father (WMBF) couples**.
1902 1902  
1903 1903  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1904 - - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1905 - - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
2056 + - **Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for key outcomes:**
2057 + - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
2058 + - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
2059 + - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
1906 1906  
1907 ------
2061 +---
1908 1908  
1909 -## **Findings**##
1910 -
2063 +## **Findings**
1911 1911  1. **Primary Observations:**
1912 - - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1913 - - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
2065 + - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
2066 + - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
1914 1914  
1915 1915  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1916 - - Participants with **strong pre-existing biases became more polarized** after exposure to conflicting views.
1917 - - **Moderate users were more likely to disengage** from conflict-heavy discussions.
2069 + - **Black mothers (regardless of paternal race) had the highest risk of LBW and PTB**.
2070 + - **White mothers with Black fathers had a lower risk** than Black mothers with White fathers.
1918 1918  
1919 1919  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1920 - - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1921 - - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
2073 + - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
2074 + - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
1922 1922  
1923 ------
2076 +---
1924 1924  
1925 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1926 -
2078 +## **Critique and Observations**
1927 1927  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1928 - - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1929 - - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
2080 + - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
2081 + - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
1930 1930  
1931 1931  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1932 - - Lacks **qualitative analysis of user motivations**.
1933 - - Focuses on **Western social media platforms**, missing global perspectives.
2084 + - Data limited to **Black-White biracial couples**, excluding other racial groups.
2085 + - **Socioeconomic and healthcare access factors** not fully explored.
1934 1934  
1935 1935  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1936 - - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1937 - - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
2088 + - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
2089 + - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
1938 1938  
1939 ------
2091 +---
1940 1940  
1941 1941  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1942 -- Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
1943 -- Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1944 -- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
2094 +- Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
2095 +- Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
2096 +- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.
1945 1945  
1946 ------
2098 +---
1947 1947  
1948 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2100 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2101 +1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
2102 +2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
2103 +3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
1949 1949  
1950 -1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
1951 -2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1952 -3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
2105 +---
1953 1953  
1954 ------
1955 -
1956 1956  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1957 -This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
2108 +This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.
1958 1958  
1959 ------
2110 +---
1960 1960  
1961 1961  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1962 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
2113 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]
2114 +
1963 1963  {{/expand}}
1964 1964  
2117 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1965 1965  
1966 -== Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions ==
1967 -
1968 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
2119 +{{expand title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions" expanded="false"}}
1969 1969  **Source:** *Politics & Policy*
1970 1970  **Date of Publication:** *2007*
1971 1971  **Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
1972 1972  **Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
1973 1973  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
1974 -**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
2125 +**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*
1975 1975  
1976 ------
2127 +---
1977 1977  
1978 -## **Key Statistics**##
1979 -
2129 +## **Key Statistics**
1980 1980  1. **General Observations:**
1981 1981   - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
1982 1982   - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
... ... @@ -1989,10 +1989,9 @@
1989 1989   - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
1990 1990   - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
1991 1991  
1992 ------
2142 +---
1993 1993  
1994 -## **Findings**##
1995 -
2144 +## **Findings**
1996 1996  1. **Primary Observations:**
1997 1997   - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
1998 1998   - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
... ... @@ -2005,10 +2005,9 @@
2005 2005   - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
2006 2006   - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
2007 2007  
2008 ------
2157 +---
2009 2009  
2010 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2011 -
2159 +## **Critique and Observations**
2012 2012  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2013 2013   - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
2014 2014   - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
... ... @@ -2021,115 +2021,31 @@
2021 2021   - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
2022 2022   - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
2023 2023  
2024 ------
2172 +---
2025 2025  
2026 2026  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2027 2027  - Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
2028 2028  - Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
2029 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
2177 +- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.
2030 2030  
2031 ------
2179 +---
2032 2032  
2033 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2034 -
2181 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2035 2035  1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
2036 2036  2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
2037 2037  3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
2038 2038  
2039 ------
2186 +---
2040 2040  
2041 2041  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2042 -This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
2189 +This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.
2043 2043  
2044 ------
2191 +---
2045 2045  
2046 2046  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2047 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
2048 -{{/expand}}
2194 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]
2049 2049  
2050 -
2051 -== Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion ==
2052 -
2053 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
2054 -**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
2055 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
2056 -**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
2057 -**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
2058 -**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2059 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
2060 -
2061 ------
2062 -
2063 -## **Key Statistics**##
2064 -
2065 -1. **General Observations:**
2066 - - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
2067 - - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
2068 -
2069 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
2070 - - **Video-based content was 2x more persuasive** than text-based content.
2071 - - Participants **under age 35 were more susceptible to political messaging shifts**.
2072 -
2073 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
2074 - - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
2075 - - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
2076 -
2077 ------
2078 -
2079 -## **Findings**##
2080 -
2081 -1. **Primary Observations:**
2082 - - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
2083 - - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
2084 -
2085 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
2086 - - **Social media platforms had stronger persuasive effects** than news websites.
2087 - - Participants who engaged in **online discussions retained more political knowledge**.
2088 -
2089 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
2090 - - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
2091 - - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
2092 -
2093 ------
2094 -
2095 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2096 -
2097 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2098 - - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
2099 - - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
2100 -
2101 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
2102 - - Limited to **short-term persuasion effects**, without long-term follow-up.
2103 - - Does not explore **the role of misinformation in political persuasion**.
2104 -
2105 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
2106 - - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
2107 - - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
2108 -
2109 ------
2110 -
2111 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
2112 -- Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
2113 -- Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
2114 -- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
2115 -
2116 ------
2117 -
2118 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2119 -
2120 -1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
2121 -2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
2122 -3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
2123 -
2124 ------
2125 -
2126 -## **Summary of Research Study**
2127 -This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
2128 -
2129 ------
2130 -
2131 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
2132 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
2133 2133  {{/expand}}
2134 2134  
2198 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
2135 2135