0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 79.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 06:48
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 77.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 06:43
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -15,24 +15,20 @@
15 15  
16 16  == Research Studies Repository ==
17 17  
18 -
19 19  = Genetics =
20 20  
21 -
22 22  == Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History ==
23 -
24 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
21 +{{expand title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History" expanded="false"}}
25 25  **Source:** *Nature*
26 26  **Date of Publication:** *2009*
27 27  **Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
28 28  **Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
29 29  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
30 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
27 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*
31 31  
32 ------
29 +---
33 33  
34 -## **Key Statistics**##
35 -
31 +## **Key Statistics**
36 36  1. **General Observations:**
37 37   - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
38 38   - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
... ... @@ -45,10 +45,9 @@
45 45   - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
46 46   - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
47 47  
48 ------
44 +---
49 49  
50 -## **Findings**##
51 -
46 +## **Findings**
52 52  1. **Primary Observations:**
53 53   - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
54 54   - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
... ... @@ -61,10 +61,9 @@
61 61   - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
62 62   - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
63 63  
64 ------
59 +---
65 65  
66 -## **Critique and Observations**##
67 -
61 +## **Critique and Observations**
68 68  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
69 69   - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
70 70   - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
... ... @@ -77,49 +77,48 @@
77 77   - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
78 78   - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
79 79  
80 ------
74 +---
81 81  
82 82  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
83 83  - Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
84 84  - Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
85 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
79 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
86 86  
87 ------
81 +---
88 88  
89 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
90 -
83 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
91 91  1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
92 92  2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
93 93  3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
94 94  
95 ------
88 +---
96 96  
97 97  ## **Summary of Research Study**
98 -This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
91 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.
99 99  
100 100  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
101 101  
102 ------
95 +---
103 103  
104 104  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
105 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
98 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
99 +
106 106  {{/expand}}
107 107  
108 108  
109 -== Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations ==
110 110  
111 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
104 +== Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations ==
105 +{{expand title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations" expanded="false"}}
112 112  **Source:** *Nature*
113 113  **Date of Publication:** *2016*
114 114  **Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
115 115  **Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
116 116  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
117 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
111 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
118 118  
119 ------
113 +---
120 120  
121 -## **Key Statistics**##
122 -
115 +## **Key Statistics**
123 123  1. **General Observations:**
124 124   - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
125 125   - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
... ... @@ -132,10 +132,9 @@
132 132   - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
133 133   - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
134 134  
135 ------
128 +---
136 136  
137 -## **Findings**##
138 -
130 +## **Findings**
139 139  1. **Primary Observations:**
140 140   - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
141 141   - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
... ... @@ -148,10 +148,9 @@
148 148   - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
149 149   - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
150 150  
151 ------
143 +---
152 152  
153 -## **Critique and Observations**##
154 -
145 +## **Critique and Observations**
155 155  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
156 156   - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
157 157   - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
... ... @@ -164,49 +164,47 @@
164 164   - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
165 165   - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
166 166  
167 ------
158 +---
168 168  
169 169  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
170 170  - Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
171 171  - Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
172 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
163 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
173 173  
174 ------
165 +---
175 175  
176 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
177 -
167 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
178 178  1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
179 179  2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
180 180  3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
181 181  
182 ------
172 +---
183 183  
184 184  ## **Summary of Research Study**
185 -This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
175 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.
186 186  
187 187  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
188 188  
189 ------
179 +---
190 190  
191 191  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
192 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
182 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
183 +
193 193  {{/expand}}
194 194  
195 195  
196 196  == Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies ==
197 -
198 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
188 +{{expand title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies" expanded="false"}}
199 199  **Source:** *Nature Genetics*
200 200  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
201 201  **Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
202 202  **Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
203 203  **DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
204 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
194 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
205 205  
206 ------
196 +---
207 207  
208 -## **Key Statistics**##
209 -
198 +## **Key Statistics**
210 210  1. **General Observations:**
211 211   - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
212 212   - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
... ... @@ -219,16 +219,15 @@
219 219   - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
220 220   - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
221 221  
222 ------
211 +---
223 223  
224 -## **Findings**##
225 -
213 +## **Findings**
226 226  1. **Primary Observations:**
227 227   - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
228 228   - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
229 229  
230 230  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
231 - - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (70-80%)**.
219 + - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (~70-80%)**.
232 232   - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
233 233  
234 234  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
... ... @@ -235,10 +235,9 @@
235 235   - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
236 236   - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
237 237  
238 ------
226 +---
239 239  
240 -## **Critique and Observations**##
241 -
228 +## **Critique and Observations**
242 242  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
243 243   - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
244 244   - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
... ... @@ -251,49 +251,47 @@
251 251   - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
252 252   - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
253 253  
254 ------
241 +---
255 255  
256 256  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
257 257  - Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
258 258  - Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
259 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
246 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
260 260  
261 ------
248 +---
262 262  
263 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
264 -
250 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
265 265  1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
266 266  2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
267 267  3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
268 268  
269 ------
255 +---
270 270  
271 271  ## **Summary of Research Study**
272 -This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
258 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.
273 273  
274 274  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
275 275  
276 ------
262 +---
277 277  
278 278  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
279 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
265 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
266 +
280 280  {{/expand}}
281 281  
282 282  
283 283  == Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease ==
284 -
285 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
271 +{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}}
286 286  **Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
287 287  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
288 288  **Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
289 289  **Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
290 290  **DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
291 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
277 +**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*
292 292  
293 ------
279 +---
294 294  
295 -## **Key Statistics**##
296 -
281 +## **Key Statistics**
297 297  1. **General Observations:**
298 298   - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
299 299   - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
... ... @@ -306,10 +306,9 @@
306 306   - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
307 307   - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
308 308  
309 ------
294 +---
310 310  
311 -## **Findings**##
312 -
296 +## **Findings**
313 313  1. **Primary Observations:**
314 314   - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
315 315   - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
... ... @@ -322,10 +322,9 @@
322 322   - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
323 323   - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
324 324  
325 ------
309 +---
326 326  
327 -## **Critique and Observations**##
328 -
311 +## **Critique and Observations**
329 329  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
330 330   - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
331 331   - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
... ... @@ -338,49 +338,47 @@
338 338   - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
339 339   - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
340 340  
341 ------
324 +---
342 342  
343 343  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
344 344  - Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
345 345  - Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
346 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
329 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
347 347  
348 ------
331 +---
349 349  
350 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
351 -
333 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
352 352  1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
353 353  2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
354 354  3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
355 355  
356 ------
338 +---
357 357  
358 358  ## **Summary of Research Study**
359 -This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
341 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.
360 360  
361 361  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
362 362  
363 ------
345 +---
364 364  
365 365  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
366 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
348 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
349 +
367 367  {{/expand}}
368 368  
369 369  
370 370  == Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA ==
371 -
372 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
354 +{{expand title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA" expanded="false"}}
373 373  **Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
374 374  **Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
375 375  **Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
376 376  **Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
377 377  **DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
378 -**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
360 +**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*
379 379  
380 ------
362 +---
381 381  
382 -## **Key Statistics**##
383 -
364 +## **Key Statistics**
384 384  1. **General Observations:**
385 385   - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
386 386   - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
... ... @@ -393,10 +393,9 @@
393 393   - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
394 394   - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
395 395  
396 ------
377 +---
397 397  
398 -## **Findings**##
399 -
379 +## **Findings**
400 400  1. **Primary Observations:**
401 401   - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
402 402   - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
... ... @@ -410,10 +410,9 @@
410 410   - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
411 411   - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
412 412  
413 ------
393 +---
414 414  
415 -## **Critique and Observations**##
416 -
395 +## **Critique and Observations**
417 417  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
418 418   - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
419 419   - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
... ... @@ -426,47 +426,44 @@
426 426   - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
427 427   - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
428 428  
429 ------
408 +---
430 430  
431 431  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
432 432  - Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
433 433  - Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
434 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
413 +- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.
435 435  
436 ------
415 +---
437 437  
438 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
439 -
417 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
440 440  1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
441 441  2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
442 442  3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
443 443  
444 ------
422 +---
445 445  
446 446  ## **Summary of Research Study**
447 -This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
425 +This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.
448 448  
449 ------
427 +---
450 450  
451 451  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
452 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
430 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]
431 +
453 453  {{/expand}}
454 454  
455 -
456 456  == Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age ==
457 -
458 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
435 +{{expand title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age" expanded="false"}}
459 459  **Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
460 460  **Date of Publication:** *2013*
461 461  **Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
462 462  **Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
463 463  **DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
464 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
441 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
465 465  
466 ------
443 +---
467 467  
468 -## **Key Statistics**##
469 -
445 +## **Key Statistics**
470 470  1. **General Observations:**
471 471   - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
472 472   - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
... ... @@ -479,10 +479,9 @@
479 479   - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
480 480   - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
481 481  
482 ------
458 +---
483 483  
484 -## **Findings**##
485 -
460 +## **Findings**
486 486  1. **Primary Observations:**
487 487   - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
488 488   - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
... ... @@ -495,10 +495,9 @@
495 495   - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
496 496   - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
497 497  
498 ------
473 +---
499 499  
500 -## **Critique and Observations**##
501 -
475 +## **Critique and Observations**
502 502  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
503 503   - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
504 504   - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
... ... @@ -511,49 +511,46 @@
511 511   - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
512 512   - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
513 513  
514 ------
488 +---
515 515  
516 516  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
517 517  - Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
518 518  - Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
519 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
493 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
520 520  
521 ------
495 +---
522 522  
523 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
524 -
497 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
525 525  1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
526 526  2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
527 527  3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
528 528  
529 ------
502 +---
530 530  
531 531  ## **Summary of Research Study**
532 -This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
505 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.
533 533  
534 534  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
535 535  
536 ------
509 +---
537 537  
538 538  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
539 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
512 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
513 +
540 540  {{/expand}}
541 541  
542 -
543 543  == Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications ==
544 -
545 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
517 +{{expand title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications" expanded="false"}}
546 546  **Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
547 547  **Date of Publication:** *2010*
548 548  **Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
549 549  **Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
550 550  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
551 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
523 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
552 552  
553 ------
525 +---
554 554  
555 -## **Key Statistics**##
556 -
527 +## **Key Statistics**
557 557  1. **General Observations:**
558 558   - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
559 559   - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
... ... @@ -566,10 +566,9 @@
566 566   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
567 567   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
568 568  
569 ------
540 +---
570 570  
571 -## **Findings**##
572 -
542 +## **Findings**
573 573  1. **Primary Observations:**
574 574   - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
575 575   - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
... ... @@ -582,10 +582,9 @@
582 582   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
583 583   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
584 584  
585 ------
555 +---
586 586  
587 -## **Critique and Observations**##
588 -
557 +## **Critique and Observations**
589 589  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
590 590   - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
591 591   - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
... ... @@ -598,49 +598,47 @@
598 598   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
599 599   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
600 600  
601 ------
570 +---
602 602  
603 603  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
604 604  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
605 605  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
606 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
575 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
607 607  
608 ------
577 +---
609 609  
610 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
611 -
579 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
612 612  1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
613 613  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
614 614  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
615 615  
616 ------
584 +---
617 617  
618 618  ## **Summary of Research Study**
619 -This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
587 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.
620 620  
621 621  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
622 622  
623 ------
591 +---
624 624  
625 625  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
626 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
594 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
595 +
627 627  {{/expand}}
628 628  
629 629  
630 630  == Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media ==
631 -
632 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
600 +{{expand title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media" expanded="false"}}
633 633  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
634 634  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
635 635  **Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
636 636  **Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
637 637  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
638 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
606 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
639 639  
640 ------
608 +---
641 641  
642 -## **Key Statistics**##
643 -
610 +## **Key Statistics**
644 644  1. **General Observations:**
645 645   - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
646 646   - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
... ... @@ -653,10 +653,9 @@
653 653   - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
654 654   - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
655 655  
656 ------
623 +---
657 657  
658 -## **Findings**##
659 -
625 +## **Findings**
660 660  1. **Primary Observations:**
661 661   - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
662 662   - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
... ... @@ -669,10 +669,9 @@
669 669   - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
670 670   - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
671 671  
672 ------
638 +---
673 673  
674 -## **Critique and Observations**##
675 -
640 +## **Critique and Observations**
676 676  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
677 677   - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
678 678   - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
... ... @@ -685,49 +685,47 @@
685 685   - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
686 686   - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
687 687  
688 ------
653 +---
689 689  
690 690  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
691 691  - Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
692 692  - Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
693 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
658 +- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
694 694  
695 ------
660 +---
696 696  
697 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
698 -
662 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
699 699  1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
700 700  2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
701 701  3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
702 702  
703 ------
667 +---
704 704  
705 705  ## **Summary of Research Study**
706 -This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
670 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.
707 707  
708 708  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
709 709  
710 ------
674 +---
711 711  
712 712  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
713 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
677 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
678 +
714 714  {{/expand}}
715 715  
716 716  
717 717  == Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation ==
718 -
719 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
683 +{{expand title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation" expanded="false"}}
720 720  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
721 721  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
722 722  **Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
723 723  **Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
724 724  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
725 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
689 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
726 726  
727 ------
691 +---
728 728  
729 -## **Key Statistics**##
730 -
693 +## **Key Statistics**
731 731  1. **General Observations:**
732 732   - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
733 733   - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
... ... @@ -740,10 +740,9 @@
740 740   - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
741 741   - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
742 742  
743 ------
706 +---
744 744  
745 -## **Findings**##
746 -
708 +## **Findings**
747 747  1. **Primary Observations:**
748 748   - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
749 749   - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
... ... @@ -756,10 +756,9 @@
756 756   - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
757 757   - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
758 758  
759 ------
721 +---
760 760  
761 -## **Critique and Observations**##
762 -
723 +## **Critique and Observations**
763 763  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
764 764   - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
765 765   - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
... ... @@ -772,37 +772,35 @@
772 772   - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
773 773   - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
774 774  
775 ------
736 +---
776 776  
777 777  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
778 778  - Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
779 779  - Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
780 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
741 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
781 781  
782 ------
743 +---
783 783  
784 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
785 -
745 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
786 786  1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
787 787  2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
788 788  3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
789 789  
790 ------
750 +---
791 791  
792 792  ## **Summary of Research Study**
793 -This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.  ##
753 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.
794 794  
795 795  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
796 796  
797 ------
757 +---
798 798  
799 799  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
800 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
760 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
761 +
801 801  {{/expand}}
802 802  
803 -
804 804  == Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding ==
805 -
806 806  {{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
807 807  **Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
808 808  **Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
... ... @@ -809,7 +809,7 @@
809 809  **Author(s):** Smith et al.
810 810  **Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
811 811  **DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
812 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science 
771 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
813 813  
814 814  **Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
815 815  
... ... @@ -835,25 +835,22 @@
835 835  {{/expand}}
836 836  
837 837  
838 ------
797 +---
839 839  
840 840  = Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
841 841  
842 -
843 843  == Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018 ==
844 -
845 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
802 +{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}}
846 846  **Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
847 847  **Date of Publication:** *2020*
848 848  **Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
849 849  **Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
850 850  **DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
851 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
808 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*
852 852  
853 ------
810 +---
854 854  
855 -## **Key Statistics**##
856 -
812 +## **Key Statistics**
857 857  1. **General Observations:**
858 858   - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
859 859   - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
... ... @@ -866,10 +866,9 @@
866 866   - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
867 867   - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
868 868  
869 ------
825 +---
870 870  
871 -## **Findings**##
872 -
827 +## **Findings**
873 873  1. **Primary Observations:**
874 874   - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
875 875   - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
... ... @@ -882,10 +882,9 @@
882 882   - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
883 883   - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
884 884  
885 ------
840 +---
886 886  
887 -## **Critique and Observations**##
888 -
842 +## **Critique and Observations**
889 889  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
890 890   - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
891 891   - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
... ... @@ -898,27 +898,26 @@
898 898   - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
899 899   - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
900 900  
901 ------
855 +---
902 902  
903 903  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
904 904  - Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
905 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
859 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
906 906  
907 ------
861 +---
908 908  
909 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
910 -
863 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
911 911  1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
912 912  2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
913 913  
914 ------
867 +---
915 915  
916 916  ## **Summary of Research Study**
917 -This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.  ##
870 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.
918 918  
919 919  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
920 920  
921 ------
874 +---
922 922  
923 923  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
924 924  {{velocity}}
... ... @@ -928,24 +928,24 @@
928 928  [[Download>>attach:$filename]]
929 929  #else
930 930  {{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
931 -#end {{/velocity}}##
884 +#end
885 +{{/velocity}}
886 +
932 932  {{/expand}}
933 933  
934 934  
935 935  == Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ==
936 -
937 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
891 +{{expand title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" expanded="false"}}
938 938  **Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
939 939  **Date of Publication:** *2012*
940 940  **Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
941 941  **Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
942 942  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
943 -**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
897 +**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*
944 944  
945 ------
899 +---
946 946  
947 -## **Key Statistics**##
948 -
901 +## **Key Statistics**
949 949  1. **General Observations:**
950 950   - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
951 951   - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
... ... @@ -960,10 +960,9 @@
960 960   - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
961 961   - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
962 962  
963 ------
916 +---
964 964  
965 -## **Findings**##
966 -
918 +## **Findings**
967 967  1. **Primary Observations:**
968 968   - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
969 969   - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
... ... @@ -976,10 +976,9 @@
976 976   - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
977 977   - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
978 978  
979 ------
931 +---
980 980  
981 -## **Critique and Observations**##
982 -
933 +## **Critique and Observations**
983 983  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
984 984   - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
985 985   - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
... ... @@ -992,47 +992,45 @@
992 992   - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
993 993   - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
994 994  
995 ------
946 +---
996 996  
997 997  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
998 998  - Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
999 999  - Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
1000 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
951 +- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.
1001 1001  
1002 ------
953 +---
1003 1003  
1004 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1005 -
955 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1006 1006  1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
1007 1007  2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
1008 1008  3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
1009 1009  
1010 ------
960 +---
1011 1011  
1012 1012  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1013 -This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
963 +This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.
1014 1014  
1015 ------
965 +---
1016 1016  
1017 1017  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1018 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
968 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]
969 +
1019 1019  {{/expand}}
1020 1020  
1021 1021  
1022 1022  == Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness ==
1023 -
1024 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
974 +{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}}
1025 1025  **Source:** *Current Psychology*
1026 1026  **Date of Publication:** *2024*
1027 1027  **Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
1028 1028  **Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
1029 1029  **DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
1030 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
980 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
1031 1031  
1032 ------
982 +---
1033 1033  
1034 -## **Key Statistics**##
1035 -
984 +## **Key Statistics**
1036 1036  1. **General Observations:**
1037 1037   - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
1038 1038   - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
... ... @@ -1045,10 +1045,9 @@
1045 1045   - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
1046 1046   - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
1047 1047  
1048 ------
997 +---
1049 1049  
1050 -## **Findings**##
1051 -
999 +## **Findings**
1052 1052  1. **Primary Observations:**
1053 1053   - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
1054 1054   - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
... ... @@ -1061,10 +1061,9 @@
1061 1061   - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
1062 1062   - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
1063 1063  
1064 ------
1012 +---
1065 1065  
1066 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1067 -
1014 +## **Critique and Observations**
1068 1068  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1069 1069   - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
1070 1070   - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
... ... @@ -1077,52 +1077,131 @@
1077 1077   - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
1078 1078   - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
1079 1079  
1080 ------
1027 +---
1081 1081  
1082 1082  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1083 1083  - Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
1084 1084  - Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
1085 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
1032 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
1086 1086  
1087 ------
1034 +---
1088 1088  
1089 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1090 -
1036 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1091 1091  1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
1092 1092  2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
1093 1093  3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
1094 1094  
1095 ------
1041 +---
1096 1096  
1097 1097  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1098 -This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
1044 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.
1099 1099  
1100 1100  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1101 1101  
1102 ------
1048 +---
1103 1103  
1104 1104  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1105 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
1051 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
1052 +
1106 1106  {{/expand}}
1107 1107  
1108 1108  
1109 1109  = Crime and Substance Abuse =
1110 1110  
1058 +== Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1059 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1060 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1061 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1062 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1063 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1064 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1065 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1111 1111  
1112 -== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1067 +---
1113 1113  
1114 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1069 +## **Key Statistics**
1070 +1. **General Observations:**
1071 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1072 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1073 +
1074 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1075 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1076 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1077 +
1078 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1079 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1080 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1081 +
1082 +---
1083 +
1084 +## **Findings**
1085 +1. **Primary Observations:**
1086 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1087 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1088 +
1089 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1090 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1091 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1092 +
1093 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1094 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1095 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1096 +
1097 +---
1098 +
1099 +## **Critique and Observations**
1100 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1101 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1102 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1103 +
1104 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1105 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1106 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1107 +
1108 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1109 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1110 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1111 +
1112 +---
1113 +
1114 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1115 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1116 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1117 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1118 +
1119 +---
1120 +
1121 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1122 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1123 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1124 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1125 +
1126 +---
1127 +
1128 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1129 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1130 +
1131 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1132 +
1133 +---
1134 +
1135 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1136 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1137 +
1138 +{{/expand}}
1139 +
1140 +== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1141 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1115 1115  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1116 1116  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
1117 1117  **Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1118 1118  **Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1119 1119  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1120 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1147 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1121 1121  
1122 ------
1149 +---
1123 1123  
1124 -## **Key Statistics**##
1125 -
1151 +## **Key Statistics**
1126 1126  1. **General Observations:**
1127 1127   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1128 1128   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -1135,10 +1135,9 @@
1135 1135   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1136 1136   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1137 1137  
1138 ------
1164 +---
1139 1139  
1140 -## **Findings**##
1141 -
1166 +## **Findings**
1142 1142  1. **Primary Observations:**
1143 1143   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1144 1144   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -1151,10 +1151,9 @@
1151 1151   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1152 1152   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1153 1153  
1154 ------
1179 +---
1155 1155  
1156 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1157 -
1181 +## **Critique and Observations**
1158 1158  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1159 1159   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1160 1160   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1167,49 +1167,46 @@
1167 1167   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1168 1168   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1169 1169  
1170 ------
1194 +---
1171 1171  
1172 1172  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1173 1173  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1174 1174  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1175 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1199 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1176 1176  
1177 ------
1201 +---
1178 1178  
1179 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1180 -
1203 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1181 1181  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1182 1182  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1183 1183  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1184 1184  
1185 ------
1208 +---
1186 1186  
1187 1187  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1188 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1211 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1189 1189  
1190 1190  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1191 1191  
1192 ------
1215 +---
1193 1193  
1194 1194  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1195 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1218 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1219 +
1196 1196  {{/expand}}
1197 1197  
1198 -
1199 1199  == Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1200 -
1201 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1223 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1202 1202  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1203 1203  **Date of Publication:** *2003*
1204 1204  **Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1205 1205  **Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1206 1206  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1207 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1229 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1208 1208  
1209 ------
1231 +---
1210 1210  
1211 -## **Key Statistics**##
1212 -
1233 +## **Key Statistics**
1213 1213  1. **General Observations:**
1214 1214   - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1215 1215   - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
... ... @@ -1222,10 +1222,9 @@
1222 1222   - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1223 1223   - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1224 1224  
1225 ------
1246 +---
1226 1226  
1227 -## **Findings**##
1228 -
1248 +## **Findings**
1229 1229  1. **Primary Observations:**
1230 1230   - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1231 1231   - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
... ... @@ -1238,10 +1238,9 @@
1238 1238   - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1239 1239   - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1240 1240  
1241 ------
1261 +---
1242 1242  
1243 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1244 -
1263 +## **Critique and Observations**
1245 1245  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1246 1246   - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1247 1247   - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
... ... @@ -1254,49 +1254,47 @@
1254 1254   - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1255 1255   - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1256 1256  
1257 ------
1276 +---
1258 1258  
1259 1259  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1260 1260  - Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1261 1261  - Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1262 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1281 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1263 1263  
1264 ------
1283 +---
1265 1265  
1266 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1267 -
1285 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1268 1268  1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1269 1269  2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1270 1270  3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1271 1271  
1272 ------
1290 +---
1273 1273  
1274 1274  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1275 -This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
1293 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1276 1276  
1277 1277  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1278 1278  
1279 ------
1297 +---
1280 1280  
1281 1281  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1282 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
1300 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1301 +
1283 1283  {{/expand}}
1284 1284  
1285 1285  
1286 1286  == Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1287 -
1288 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1306 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1289 1289  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1290 1290  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
1291 1291  **Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1292 1292  **Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1293 1293  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1294 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1312 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1295 1295  
1296 ------
1314 +---
1297 1297  
1298 -## **Key Statistics**##
1299 -
1316 +## **Key Statistics**
1300 1300  1. **General Observations:**
1301 1301   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1302 1302   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -1309,10 +1309,9 @@
1309 1309   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1310 1310   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1311 1311  
1312 ------
1329 +---
1313 1313  
1314 -## **Findings**##
1315 -
1331 +## **Findings**
1316 1316  1. **Primary Observations:**
1317 1317   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1318 1318   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -1325,10 +1325,9 @@
1325 1325   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1326 1326   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1327 1327  
1328 ------
1344 +---
1329 1329  
1330 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1331 -
1346 +## **Critique and Observations**
1332 1332  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1333 1333   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1334 1334   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1341,39 +1341,36 @@
1341 1341   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1342 1342   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1343 1343  
1344 ------
1359 +---
1345 1345  
1346 1346  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1347 1347  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1348 1348  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1349 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1364 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1350 1350  
1351 ------
1366 +---
1352 1352  
1353 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1354 -
1368 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1355 1355  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1356 1356  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1357 1357  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1358 1358  
1359 ------
1373 +---
1360 1360  
1361 1361  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1362 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1376 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1363 1363  
1364 1364  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1365 1365  
1366 ------
1380 +---
1367 1367  
1368 1368  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1369 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1383 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1384 +
1370 1370  {{/expand}}
1371 1371  
1372 -
1373 1373  == Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults ==
1374 -
1375 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1376 - Source: Addictive Behaviors
1388 +{{expand title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" expanded="false"}} Source: Addictive Behaviors
1377 1377  Date of Publication: 2016
1378 1378  Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
1379 1379  Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
... ... @@ -1434,23 +1434,22 @@
1434 1434  
1435 1435  📄 Download Full Study
1436 1436  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
1449 +
1437 1437  {{/expand}}
1438 1438  
1439 1439  
1440 1440  == Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time? ==
1441 -
1442 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1454 +{{expand title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?" expanded="false"}}
1443 1443  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1444 1444  **Date of Publication:** *2014*
1445 1445  **Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1446 1446  **Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1447 1447  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1448 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1460 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
1449 1449  
1450 ------
1462 +---
1451 1451  
1452 -## **Key Statistics**##
1453 -
1464 +## **Key Statistics**
1454 1454  1. **General Observations:**
1455 1455   - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1456 1456   - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
... ... @@ -1463,10 +1463,9 @@
1463 1463   - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1464 1464   - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1465 1465  
1466 ------
1477 +---
1467 1467  
1468 -## **Findings**##
1469 -
1479 +## **Findings**
1470 1470  1. **Primary Observations:**
1471 1471   - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1472 1472   - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
... ... @@ -1479,10 +1479,9 @@
1479 1479   - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1480 1480   - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1481 1481  
1482 ------
1492 +---
1483 1483  
1484 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1485 -
1494 +## **Critique and Observations**
1486 1486  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1487 1487   - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1488 1488   - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
... ... @@ -1495,51 +1495,52 @@
1495 1495   - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1496 1496   - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1497 1497  
1498 ------
1507 +---
1499 1499  
1500 1500  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1501 1501  - Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1502 1502  - Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1503 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1512 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
1504 1504  
1505 ------
1514 +---
1506 1506  
1507 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1508 -
1516 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1509 1509  1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1510 1510  2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1511 1511  3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1512 1512  
1513 ------
1521 +---
1514 1514  
1515 1515  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1516 -This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.  ##
1524 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.
1517 1517  
1518 1518  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1519 1519  
1520 ------
1528 +---
1521 1521  
1522 1522  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1523 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
1531 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
1532 +
1524 1524  {{/expand}}
1525 1525  
1526 1526  
1527 -= Whiteness & White Guilt =
1528 1528  
1529 -== Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports ==
1530 1530  
1531 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1538 +
1539 += Whiteness =
1540 +
1541 +== Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports ==
1542 +{{expand title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports" expanded="false"}}
1532 1532  **Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1533 1533  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
1534 1534  **Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1535 1535  **Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1536 1536  **DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1537 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1548 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
1538 1538  
1539 ------
1550 +---
1540 1540  
1541 -## **Key Statistics**##
1542 -
1552 +## **Key Statistics**
1543 1543  1. **General Observations:**
1544 1544   - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1545 1545   - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
... ... @@ -1552,10 +1552,9 @@
1552 1552   - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1553 1553   - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1554 1554  
1555 ------
1565 +---
1556 1556  
1557 -## **Findings**##
1558 -
1567 +## **Findings**
1559 1559  1. **Primary Observations:**
1560 1560   - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1561 1561   - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
... ... @@ -1568,10 +1568,9 @@
1568 1568   - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1569 1569   - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1570 1570  
1571 ------
1580 +---
1572 1572  
1573 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1574 -
1582 +## **Critique and Observations**
1575 1575  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1576 1576   - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1577 1577   - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
... ... @@ -1584,49 +1584,52 @@
1584 1584   - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1585 1585   - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1586 1586  
1587 ------
1595 +---
1588 1588  
1589 1589  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1590 1590  - Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1591 1591  - Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1592 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1600 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
1593 1593  
1594 ------
1602 +---
1595 1595  
1596 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1597 -
1604 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1598 1598  1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1599 1599  2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1600 1600  3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1601 1601  
1602 ------
1609 +---
1603 1603  
1604 1604  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1605 -This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
1612 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.
1606 1606  
1607 1607  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1608 1608  
1609 ------
1616 +---
1610 1610  
1611 1611  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1612 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
1619 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
1620 +
1613 1613  {{/expand}}
1614 1614  
1615 1615  
1616 -== Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations ==
1617 1617  
1618 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1625 +
1626 +
1627 += White Guilt =
1628 +
1629 +== Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations ==
1630 +{{expand title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations" expanded="false"}}
1619 1619  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1620 1620  **Date of Publication:** *2016*
1621 1621  **Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1622 1622  **Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1623 1623  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1624 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1636 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1625 1625  
1626 ------
1638 +---
1627 1627  
1628 -## **Key Statistics**##
1629 -
1640 +## **Key Statistics**
1630 1630  1. **General Observations:**
1631 1631   - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1632 1632   - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
... ... @@ -1639,10 +1639,9 @@
1639 1639   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1640 1640   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1641 1641  
1642 ------
1653 +---
1643 1643  
1644 -## **Findings**##
1645 -
1655 +## **Findings**
1646 1646  1. **Primary Observations:**
1647 1647   - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1648 1648   - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
... ... @@ -1655,10 +1655,9 @@
1655 1655   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1656 1656   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1657 1657  
1658 ------
1668 +---
1659 1659  
1660 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1661 -
1670 +## **Critique and Observations**
1662 1662  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1663 1663   - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1664 1664   - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
... ... @@ -1671,49 +1671,47 @@
1671 1671   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1672 1672   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1673 1673  
1674 ------
1683 +---
1675 1675  
1676 1676  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1677 1677  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1678 1678  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1679 -- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1688 +- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1680 1680  
1681 ------
1690 +---
1682 1682  
1683 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1684 -
1692 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1685 1685  1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1686 1686  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1687 1687  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1688 1688  
1689 ------
1697 +---
1690 1690  
1691 1691  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1692 -This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
1700 +This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.
1693 1693  
1694 1694  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1695 1695  
1696 ------
1704 +---
1697 1697  
1698 1698  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1699 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
1707 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1708 +
1700 1700  {{/expand}}
1701 1701  
1702 1702  
1703 1703  == Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans ==
1704 -
1705 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1713 +{{expand title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans" expanded="false"}}
1706 1706  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1707 1707  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
1708 1708  **Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1709 1709  **Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1710 1710  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1711 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1719 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1712 1712  
1713 ------
1721 +---
1714 1714  
1715 -## **Key Statistics**##
1716 -
1723 +## **Key Statistics**
1717 1717  1. **General Observations:**
1718 1718   - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1719 1719   - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
... ... @@ -1726,10 +1726,9 @@
1726 1726   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1727 1727   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1728 1728  
1729 ------
1736 +---
1730 1730  
1731 -## **Findings**##
1732 -
1738 +## **Findings**
1733 1733  1. **Primary Observations:**
1734 1734   - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1735 1735   - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
... ... @@ -1742,10 +1742,9 @@
1742 1742   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1743 1743   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1744 1744  
1745 ------
1751 +---
1746 1746  
1747 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1748 -
1753 +## **Critique and Observations**
1749 1749  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1750 1750   - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1751 1751   - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
... ... @@ -1758,49 +1758,46 @@
1758 1758   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1759 1759   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1760 1760  
1761 ------
1766 +---
1762 1762  
1763 1763  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1764 1764  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1765 1765  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1766 -- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1771 +- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1767 1767  
1768 ------
1773 +---
1769 1769  
1770 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1771 -
1775 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1772 1772  1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1773 1773  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1774 1774  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1775 1775  
1776 ------
1780 +---
1777 1777  
1778 1778  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1779 -This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
1783 +This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.
1780 1780  
1781 1781  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1782 1782  
1783 ------
1787 +---
1784 1784  
1785 1785  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1786 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
1790 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1791 +
1787 1787  {{/expand}}
1788 1788  
1789 -
1790 1790  == Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities? ==
1791 -
1792 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1795 +{{expand title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?" expanded="false"}}
1793 1793  **Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1794 1794  **Date of Publication:** *2023*
1795 1795  **Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1796 1796  **Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1797 1797  **DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1798 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1801 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1799 1799  
1800 ------
1803 +---
1801 1801  
1802 -## **Key Statistics**##
1803 -
1805 +## **Key Statistics**
1804 1804  1. **General Observations:**
1805 1805   - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1806 1806   - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
... ... @@ -1813,10 +1813,9 @@
1813 1813   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1814 1814   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1815 1815  
1816 ------
1818 +---
1817 1817  
1818 -## **Findings**##
1819 -
1820 +## **Findings**
1820 1820  1. **Primary Observations:**
1821 1821   - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1822 1822   - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
... ... @@ -1829,10 +1829,9 @@
1829 1829   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1830 1830   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1831 1831  
1832 ------
1833 +---
1833 1833  
1834 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1835 -
1835 +## **Critique and Observations**
1836 1836  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1837 1837   - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1838 1838   - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
... ... @@ -1845,52 +1845,50 @@
1845 1845   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1846 1846   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1847 1847  
1848 ------
1848 +---
1849 1849  
1850 1850  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1851 1851  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1852 1852  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1853 -- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
1853 +- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1854 1854  
1855 ------
1855 +---
1856 1856  
1857 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1858 -
1857 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1859 1859  1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1860 1860  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1861 1861  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1862 1862  
1863 ------
1862 +---
1864 1864  
1865 1865  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1866 -This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
1865 +This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.
1867 1867  
1868 1868  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1869 1869  
1870 ------
1869 +---
1871 1871  
1872 1872  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1873 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
1872 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1873 +
1874 1874  {{/expand}}
1875 1875  
1876 1876  
1877 +
1877 1877  = Media =
1878 1878  
1879 -
1880 1880  == Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic ==
1881 -
1882 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"}}
1881 +{{expand title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict" expanded="false"}}
1883 1883  **Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1884 1884  **Date of Publication:** *2021*
1885 1885  **Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1886 1886  **Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1887 1887  **DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1888 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1887 +**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*
1889 1889  
1890 ------
1889 +---
1891 1891  
1892 -## **Key Statistics**##
1893 -
1891 +## **Key Statistics**
1894 1894  1. **General Observations:**
1895 1895   - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1896 1896   - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
... ... @@ -1903,10 +1903,9 @@
1903 1903   - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1904 1904   - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1905 1905  
1906 ------
1904 +---
1907 1907  
1908 -## **Findings**##
1909 -
1906 +## **Findings**
1910 1910  1. **Primary Observations:**
1911 1911   - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1912 1912   - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
... ... @@ -1919,10 +1919,9 @@
1919 1919   - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1920 1920   - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1921 1921  
1922 ------
1919 +---
1923 1923  
1924 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1925 -
1921 +## **Critique and Observations**
1926 1926  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1927 1927   - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1928 1928   - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
... ... @@ -1935,47 +1935,45 @@
1935 1935   - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1936 1936   - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1937 1937  
1938 ------
1934 +---
1939 1939  
1940 1940  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1941 1941  - Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
1942 1942  - Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1943 -- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
1939 +- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
1944 1944  
1945 ------
1941 +---
1946 1946  
1947 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1948 -
1943 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1949 1949  1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
1950 1950  2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1951 1951  3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1952 1952  
1953 ------
1948 +---
1954 1954  
1955 1955  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1956 -This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
1951 +This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.
1957 1957  
1958 ------
1953 +---
1959 1959  
1960 1960  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1961 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
1956 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
1957 +
1962 1962  {{/expand}}
1963 1963  
1964 1964  
1965 1965  == Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions ==
1966 -
1967 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
1962 +{{expand title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions" expanded="false"}}
1968 1968  **Source:** *Politics & Policy*
1969 1969  **Date of Publication:** *2007*
1970 1970  **Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
1971 1971  **Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
1972 1972  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
1973 -**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
1968 +**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*
1974 1974  
1975 ------
1970 +---
1976 1976  
1977 -## **Key Statistics**##
1978 -
1972 +## **Key Statistics**
1979 1979  1. **General Observations:**
1980 1980   - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
1981 1981   - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
... ... @@ -1988,10 +1988,9 @@
1988 1988   - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
1989 1989   - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
1990 1990  
1991 ------
1985 +---
1992 1992  
1993 -## **Findings**##
1994 -
1987 +## **Findings**
1995 1995  1. **Primary Observations:**
1996 1996   - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
1997 1997   - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
... ... @@ -2004,10 +2004,9 @@
2004 2004   - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
2005 2005   - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
2006 2006  
2007 ------
2000 +---
2008 2008  
2009 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2010 -
2002 +## **Critique and Observations**
2011 2011  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2012 2012   - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
2013 2013   - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
... ... @@ -2020,47 +2020,44 @@
2020 2020   - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
2021 2021   - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
2022 2022  
2023 ------
2015 +---
2024 2024  
2025 2025  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2026 2026  - Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
2027 2027  - Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
2028 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
2020 +- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.
2029 2029  
2030 ------
2022 +---
2031 2031  
2032 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2033 -
2024 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2034 2034  1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
2035 2035  2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
2036 2036  3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
2037 2037  
2038 ------
2029 +---
2039 2039  
2040 2040  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2041 -This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
2032 +This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.
2042 2042  
2043 ------
2034 +---
2044 2044  
2045 2045  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2046 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
2037 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]
2038 +
2047 2047  {{/expand}}
2048 2048  
2049 -
2050 2050  == Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion ==
2051 -
2052 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
2042 +{{expand title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion" expanded="false"}}
2053 2053  **Source:** *Journal of Communication*
2054 2054  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
2055 2055  **Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
2056 2056  **Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
2057 2057  **DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2058 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
2048 +**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*
2059 2059  
2060 ------
2050 +---
2061 2061  
2062 -## **Key Statistics**##
2063 -
2052 +## **Key Statistics**
2064 2064  1. **General Observations:**
2065 2065   - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
2066 2066   - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
... ... @@ -2073,10 +2073,9 @@
2073 2073   - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
2074 2074   - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
2075 2075  
2076 ------
2065 +---
2077 2077  
2078 -## **Findings**##
2079 -
2067 +## **Findings**
2080 2080  1. **Primary Observations:**
2081 2081   - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
2082 2082   - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
... ... @@ -2089,10 +2089,9 @@
2089 2089   - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
2090 2090   - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
2091 2091  
2092 ------
2080 +---
2093 2093  
2094 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2095 -
2082 +## **Critique and Observations**
2096 2096  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2097 2097   - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
2098 2098   - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
... ... @@ -2105,31 +2105,31 @@
2105 2105   - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
2106 2106   - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
2107 2107  
2108 ------
2095 +---
2109 2109  
2110 2110  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2111 2111  - Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
2112 2112  - Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
2113 -- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
2100 +- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
2114 2114  
2115 ------
2102 +---
2116 2116  
2117 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2118 -
2104 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2119 2119  1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
2120 2120  2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
2121 2121  3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
2122 2122  
2123 ------
2109 +---
2124 2124  
2125 2125  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2126 -This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
2112 +This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.
2127 2127  
2128 ------
2114 +---
2129 2129  
2130 2130  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2131 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
2117 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
2118 +
2132 2132  {{/expand}}
2133 2133  
2134 2134  
2135 -
2122 +