0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 78.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 06:43
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 77.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 06:43
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -18,19 +18,17 @@
18 18  = Genetics =
19 19  
20 20  == Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History ==
21 -
22 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
21 +{{expand title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History" expanded="false"}}
23 23  **Source:** *Nature*
24 24  **Date of Publication:** *2009*
25 25  **Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
26 26  **Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
27 27  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
28 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
27 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*
29 29  
30 ------
29 +---
31 31  
32 -## **Key Statistics**##
33 -
31 +## **Key Statistics**
34 34  1. **General Observations:**
35 35   - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
36 36   - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
... ... @@ -43,10 +43,9 @@
43 43   - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
44 44   - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
45 45  
46 ------
44 +---
47 47  
48 -## **Findings**##
49 -
46 +## **Findings**
50 50  1. **Primary Observations:**
51 51   - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
52 52   - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
... ... @@ -59,10 +59,9 @@
59 59   - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
60 60   - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
61 61  
62 ------
59 +---
63 63  
64 -## **Critique and Observations**##
65 -
61 +## **Critique and Observations**
66 66  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
67 67   - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
68 68   - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
... ... @@ -75,50 +75,48 @@
75 75   - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
76 76   - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
77 77  
78 ------
74 +---
79 79  
80 80  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
81 81  - Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
82 82  - Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
83 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
79 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
84 84  
85 ------
81 +---
86 86  
87 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
88 -
83 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
89 89  1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
90 90  2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
91 91  3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
92 92  
93 ------
88 +---
94 94  
95 95  ## **Summary of Research Study**
96 -This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
91 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.
97 97  
98 98  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
99 99  
100 ------
95 +---
101 101  
102 102  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
103 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
98 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
99 +
104 104  {{/expand}}
105 105  
106 106  
107 107  
108 108  == Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations ==
109 -
110 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
105 +{{expand title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations" expanded="false"}}
111 111  **Source:** *Nature*
112 112  **Date of Publication:** *2016*
113 113  **Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
114 114  **Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
115 115  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
116 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
111 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
117 117  
118 ------
113 +---
119 119  
120 -## **Key Statistics**##
121 -
115 +## **Key Statistics**
122 122  1. **General Observations:**
123 123   - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
124 124   - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
... ... @@ -131,10 +131,9 @@
131 131   - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
132 132   - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
133 133  
134 ------
128 +---
135 135  
136 -## **Findings**##
137 -
130 +## **Findings**
138 138  1. **Primary Observations:**
139 139   - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
140 140   - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
... ... @@ -147,10 +147,9 @@
147 147   - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
148 148   - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
149 149  
150 ------
143 +---
151 151  
152 -## **Critique and Observations**##
153 -
145 +## **Critique and Observations**
154 154  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
155 155   - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
156 156   - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
... ... @@ -163,49 +163,47 @@
163 163   - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
164 164   - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
165 165  
166 ------
158 +---
167 167  
168 168  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
169 169  - Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
170 170  - Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
171 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
163 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
172 172  
173 ------
165 +---
174 174  
175 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
176 -
167 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
177 177  1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
178 178  2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
179 179  3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
180 180  
181 ------
172 +---
182 182  
183 183  ## **Summary of Research Study**
184 -This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
175 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.
185 185  
186 186  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
187 187  
188 ------
179 +---
189 189  
190 190  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
191 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
182 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
183 +
192 192  {{/expand}}
193 193  
194 194  
195 195  == Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies ==
196 -
197 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
188 +{{expand title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies" expanded="false"}}
198 198  **Source:** *Nature Genetics*
199 199  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
200 200  **Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
201 201  **Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
202 202  **DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
203 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
194 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
204 204  
205 ------
196 +---
206 206  
207 -## **Key Statistics**##
208 -
198 +## **Key Statistics**
209 209  1. **General Observations:**
210 210   - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
211 211   - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
... ... @@ -218,16 +218,15 @@
218 218   - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
219 219   - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
220 220  
221 ------
211 +---
222 222  
223 -## **Findings**##
224 -
213 +## **Findings**
225 225  1. **Primary Observations:**
226 226   - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
227 227   - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
228 228  
229 229  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
230 - - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (70-80%)**.
219 + - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (~70-80%)**.
231 231   - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
232 232  
233 233  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
... ... @@ -234,10 +234,9 @@
234 234   - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
235 235   - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
236 236  
237 ------
226 +---
238 238  
239 -## **Critique and Observations**##
240 -
228 +## **Critique and Observations**
241 241  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
242 242   - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
243 243   - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
... ... @@ -250,49 +250,47 @@
250 250   - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
251 251   - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
252 252  
253 ------
241 +---
254 254  
255 255  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
256 256  - Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
257 257  - Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
258 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
246 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
259 259  
260 ------
248 +---
261 261  
262 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
263 -
250 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
264 264  1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
265 265  2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
266 266  3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
267 267  
268 ------
255 +---
269 269  
270 270  ## **Summary of Research Study**
271 -This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
258 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.
272 272  
273 273  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
274 274  
275 ------
262 +---
276 276  
277 277  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
278 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
265 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
266 +
279 279  {{/expand}}
280 280  
281 281  
282 282  == Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease ==
283 -
284 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
271 +{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}}
285 285  **Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
286 286  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
287 287  **Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
288 288  **Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
289 289  **DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
290 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
277 +**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*
291 291  
292 ------
279 +---
293 293  
294 -## **Key Statistics**##
295 -
281 +## **Key Statistics**
296 296  1. **General Observations:**
297 297   - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
298 298   - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
... ... @@ -305,10 +305,9 @@
305 305   - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
306 306   - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
307 307  
308 ------
294 +---
309 309  
310 -## **Findings**##
311 -
296 +## **Findings**
312 312  1. **Primary Observations:**
313 313   - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
314 314   - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
... ... @@ -321,10 +321,9 @@
321 321   - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
322 322   - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
323 323  
324 ------
309 +---
325 325  
326 -## **Critique and Observations**##
327 -
311 +## **Critique and Observations**
328 328  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
329 329   - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
330 330   - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
... ... @@ -337,49 +337,47 @@
337 337   - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
338 338   - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
339 339  
340 ------
324 +---
341 341  
342 342  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
343 343  - Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
344 344  - Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
345 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
329 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
346 346  
347 ------
331 +---
348 348  
349 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
350 -
333 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
351 351  1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
352 352  2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
353 353  3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
354 354  
355 ------
338 +---
356 356  
357 357  ## **Summary of Research Study**
358 -This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
341 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.
359 359  
360 360  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
361 361  
362 ------
345 +---
363 363  
364 364  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
365 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
348 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
349 +
366 366  {{/expand}}
367 367  
368 368  
369 369  == Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA ==
370 -
371 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
354 +{{expand title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA" expanded="false"}}
372 372  **Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
373 373  **Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
374 374  **Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
375 375  **Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
376 376  **DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
377 -**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
360 +**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*
378 378  
379 ------
362 +---
380 380  
381 -## **Key Statistics**##
382 -
364 +## **Key Statistics**
383 383  1. **General Observations:**
384 384   - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
385 385   - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
... ... @@ -392,10 +392,9 @@
392 392   - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
393 393   - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
394 394  
395 ------
377 +---
396 396  
397 -## **Findings**##
398 -
379 +## **Findings**
399 399  1. **Primary Observations:**
400 400   - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
401 401   - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
... ... @@ -409,10 +409,9 @@
409 409   - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
410 410   - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
411 411  
412 ------
393 +---
413 413  
414 -## **Critique and Observations**##
415 -
395 +## **Critique and Observations**
416 416  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
417 417   - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
418 418   - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
... ... @@ -425,46 +425,44 @@
425 425   - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
426 426   - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
427 427  
428 ------
408 +---
429 429  
430 430  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
431 431  - Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
432 432  - Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
433 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
413 +- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.
434 434  
435 ------
415 +---
436 436  
437 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
438 -
417 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
439 439  1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
440 440  2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
441 441  3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
442 442  
443 ------
422 +---
444 444  
445 445  ## **Summary of Research Study**
446 -This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
425 +This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.
447 447  
448 ------
427 +---
449 449  
450 450  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
451 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
430 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]
431 +
452 452  {{/expand}}
453 453  
454 454  == Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age ==
455 -
456 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
435 +{{expand title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age" expanded="false"}}
457 457  **Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
458 458  **Date of Publication:** *2013*
459 459  **Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
460 460  **Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
461 461  **DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
462 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
441 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
463 463  
464 ------
443 +---
465 465  
466 -## **Key Statistics**##
467 -
445 +## **Key Statistics**
468 468  1. **General Observations:**
469 469   - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
470 470   - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
... ... @@ -477,10 +477,9 @@
477 477   - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
478 478   - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
479 479  
480 ------
458 +---
481 481  
482 -## **Findings**##
483 -
460 +## **Findings**
484 484  1. **Primary Observations:**
485 485   - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
486 486   - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
... ... @@ -493,10 +493,9 @@
493 493   - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
494 494   - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
495 495  
496 ------
473 +---
497 497  
498 -## **Critique and Observations**##
499 -
475 +## **Critique and Observations**
500 500  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
501 501   - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
502 502   - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
... ... @@ -509,48 +509,46 @@
509 509   - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
510 510   - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
511 511  
512 ------
488 +---
513 513  
514 514  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
515 515  - Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
516 516  - Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
517 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
493 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
518 518  
519 ------
495 +---
520 520  
521 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
522 -
497 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
523 523  1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
524 524  2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
525 525  3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
526 526  
527 ------
502 +---
528 528  
529 529  ## **Summary of Research Study**
530 -This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
505 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.
531 531  
532 532  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
533 533  
534 ------
509 +---
535 535  
536 536  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
537 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
512 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
513 +
538 538  {{/expand}}
539 539  
540 540  == Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications ==
541 -
542 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
517 +{{expand title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications" expanded="false"}}
543 543  **Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
544 544  **Date of Publication:** *2010*
545 545  **Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
546 546  **Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
547 547  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
548 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
523 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
549 549  
550 ------
525 +---
551 551  
552 -## **Key Statistics**##
553 -
527 +## **Key Statistics**
554 554  1. **General Observations:**
555 555   - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
556 556   - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
... ... @@ -563,10 +563,9 @@
563 563   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
564 564   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
565 565  
566 ------
540 +---
567 567  
568 -## **Findings**##
569 -
542 +## **Findings**
570 570  1. **Primary Observations:**
571 571   - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
572 572   - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
... ... @@ -579,10 +579,9 @@
579 579   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
580 580   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
581 581  
582 ------
555 +---
583 583  
584 -## **Critique and Observations**##
585 -
557 +## **Critique and Observations**
586 586  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
587 587   - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
588 588   - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
... ... @@ -595,49 +595,47 @@
595 595   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
596 596   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
597 597  
598 ------
570 +---
599 599  
600 600  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
601 601  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
602 602  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
603 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
575 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
604 604  
605 ------
577 +---
606 606  
607 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
608 -
579 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
609 609  1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
610 610  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
611 611  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
612 612  
613 ------
584 +---
614 614  
615 615  ## **Summary of Research Study**
616 -This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
587 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.
617 617  
618 618  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
619 619  
620 ------
591 +---
621 621  
622 622  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
623 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
594 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
595 +
624 624  {{/expand}}
625 625  
626 626  
627 627  == Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media ==
628 -
629 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
600 +{{expand title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media" expanded="false"}}
630 630  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
631 631  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
632 632  **Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
633 633  **Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
634 634  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
635 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
606 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
636 636  
637 ------
608 +---
638 638  
639 -## **Key Statistics**##
640 -
610 +## **Key Statistics**
641 641  1. **General Observations:**
642 642   - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
643 643   - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
... ... @@ -650,10 +650,9 @@
650 650   - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
651 651   - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
652 652  
653 ------
623 +---
654 654  
655 -## **Findings**##
656 -
625 +## **Findings**
657 657  1. **Primary Observations:**
658 658   - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
659 659   - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
... ... @@ -666,10 +666,9 @@
666 666   - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
667 667   - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
668 668  
669 ------
638 +---
670 670  
671 -## **Critique and Observations**##
672 -
640 +## **Critique and Observations**
673 673  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
674 674   - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
675 675   - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
... ... @@ -682,49 +682,47 @@
682 682   - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
683 683   - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
684 684  
685 ------
653 +---
686 686  
687 687  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
688 688  - Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
689 689  - Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
690 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
658 +- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
691 691  
692 ------
660 +---
693 693  
694 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
695 -
662 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
696 696  1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
697 697  2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
698 698  3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
699 699  
700 ------
667 +---
701 701  
702 702  ## **Summary of Research Study**
703 -This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
670 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.
704 704  
705 705  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
706 706  
707 ------
674 +---
708 708  
709 709  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
710 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
677 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
678 +
711 711  {{/expand}}
712 712  
713 713  
714 714  == Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation ==
715 -
716 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
683 +{{expand title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation" expanded="false"}}
717 717  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
718 718  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
719 719  **Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
720 720  **Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
721 721  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
722 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
689 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
723 723  
724 ------
691 +---
725 725  
726 -## **Key Statistics**##
727 -
693 +## **Key Statistics**
728 728  1. **General Observations:**
729 729   - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
730 730   - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
... ... @@ -737,10 +737,9 @@
737 737   - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
738 738   - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
739 739  
740 ------
706 +---
741 741  
742 -## **Findings**##
743 -
708 +## **Findings**
744 744  1. **Primary Observations:**
745 745   - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
746 746   - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
... ... @@ -753,10 +753,9 @@
753 753   - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
754 754   - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
755 755  
756 ------
721 +---
757 757  
758 -## **Critique and Observations**##
759 -
723 +## **Critique and Observations**
760 760  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
761 761   - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
762 762   - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
... ... @@ -769,36 +769,35 @@
769 769   - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
770 770   - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
771 771  
772 ------
736 +---
773 773  
774 774  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
775 775  - Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
776 776  - Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
777 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
741 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
778 778  
779 ------
743 +---
780 780  
781 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
782 -
745 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
783 783  1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
784 784  2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
785 785  3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
786 786  
787 ------
750 +---
788 788  
789 789  ## **Summary of Research Study**
790 -This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.  ##
753 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.
791 791  
792 792  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
793 793  
794 ------
757 +---
795 795  
796 796  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
797 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
760 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
761 +
798 798  {{/expand}}
799 799  
800 800  == Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding ==
801 -
802 802  {{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
803 803  **Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
804 804  **Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
... ... @@ -805,7 +805,7 @@
805 805  **Author(s):** Smith et al.
806 806  **Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
807 807  **DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
808 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science 
771 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
809 809  
810 810  **Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
811 811  
... ... @@ -831,24 +831,22 @@
831 831  {{/expand}}
832 832  
833 833  
834 ------
797 +---
835 835  
836 836  = Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
837 837  
838 838  == Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018 ==
839 -
840 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
802 +{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}}
841 841  **Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
842 842  **Date of Publication:** *2020*
843 843  **Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
844 844  **Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
845 845  **DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
846 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
808 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*
847 847  
848 ------
810 +---
849 849  
850 -## **Key Statistics**##
851 -
812 +## **Key Statistics**
852 852  1. **General Observations:**
853 853   - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
854 854   - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
... ... @@ -861,10 +861,9 @@
861 861   - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
862 862   - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
863 863  
864 ------
825 +---
865 865  
866 -## **Findings**##
867 -
827 +## **Findings**
868 868  1. **Primary Observations:**
869 869   - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
870 870   - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
... ... @@ -877,10 +877,9 @@
877 877   - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
878 878   - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
879 879  
880 ------
840 +---
881 881  
882 -## **Critique and Observations**##
883 -
842 +## **Critique and Observations**
884 884  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
885 885   - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
886 886   - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
... ... @@ -893,27 +893,26 @@
893 893   - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
894 894   - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
895 895  
896 ------
855 +---
897 897  
898 898  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
899 899  - Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
900 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
859 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
901 901  
902 ------
861 +---
903 903  
904 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
905 -
863 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
906 906  1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
907 907  2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
908 908  
909 ------
867 +---
910 910  
911 911  ## **Summary of Research Study**
912 -This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.  ##
870 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.
913 913  
914 914  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
915 915  
916 ------
874 +---
917 917  
918 918  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
919 919  {{velocity}}
... ... @@ -923,24 +923,24 @@
923 923  [[Download>>attach:$filename]]
924 924  #else
925 925  {{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
926 -#end {{/velocity}}##
884 +#end
885 +{{/velocity}}
886 +
927 927  {{/expand}}
928 928  
929 929  
930 930  == Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ==
931 -
932 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
891 +{{expand title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" expanded="false"}}
933 933  **Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
934 934  **Date of Publication:** *2012*
935 935  **Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
936 936  **Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
937 937  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
938 -**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
897 +**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*
939 939  
940 ------
899 +---
941 941  
942 -## **Key Statistics**##
943 -
901 +## **Key Statistics**
944 944  1. **General Observations:**
945 945   - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
946 946   - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
... ... @@ -955,10 +955,9 @@
955 955   - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
956 956   - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
957 957  
958 ------
916 +---
959 959  
960 -## **Findings**##
961 -
918 +## **Findings**
962 962  1. **Primary Observations:**
963 963   - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
964 964   - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
... ... @@ -971,10 +971,9 @@
971 971   - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
972 972   - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
973 973  
974 ------
931 +---
975 975  
976 -## **Critique and Observations**##
977 -
933 +## **Critique and Observations**
978 978  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
979 979   - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
980 980   - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
... ... @@ -987,47 +987,45 @@
987 987   - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
988 988   - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
989 989  
990 ------
946 +---
991 991  
992 992  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
993 993  - Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
994 994  - Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
995 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
951 +- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.
996 996  
997 ------
953 +---
998 998  
999 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1000 -
955 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1001 1001  1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
1002 1002  2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
1003 1003  3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
1004 1004  
1005 ------
960 +---
1006 1006  
1007 1007  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1008 -This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
963 +This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.
1009 1009  
1010 ------
965 +---
1011 1011  
1012 1012  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1013 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
968 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]
969 +
1014 1014  {{/expand}}
1015 1015  
1016 1016  
1017 1017  == Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness ==
1018 -
1019 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
974 +{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}}
1020 1020  **Source:** *Current Psychology*
1021 1021  **Date of Publication:** *2024*
1022 1022  **Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
1023 1023  **Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
1024 1024  **DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
1025 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
980 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
1026 1026  
1027 ------
982 +---
1028 1028  
1029 -## **Key Statistics**##
1030 -
984 +## **Key Statistics**
1031 1031  1. **General Observations:**
1032 1032   - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
1033 1033   - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
... ... @@ -1040,10 +1040,9 @@
1040 1040   - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
1041 1041   - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
1042 1042  
1043 ------
997 +---
1044 1044  
1045 -## **Findings**##
1046 -
999 +## **Findings**
1047 1047  1. **Primary Observations:**
1048 1048   - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
1049 1049   - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
... ... @@ -1056,10 +1056,9 @@
1056 1056   - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
1057 1057   - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
1058 1058  
1059 ------
1012 +---
1060 1060  
1061 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1062 -
1014 +## **Critique and Observations**
1063 1063  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1064 1064   - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
1065 1065   - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
... ... @@ -1072,32 +1072,32 @@
1072 1072   - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
1073 1073   - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
1074 1074  
1075 ------
1027 +---
1076 1076  
1077 1077  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1078 1078  - Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
1079 1079  - Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
1080 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
1032 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
1081 1081  
1082 ------
1034 +---
1083 1083  
1084 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1085 -
1036 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1086 1086  1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
1087 1087  2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
1088 1088  3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
1089 1089  
1090 ------
1041 +---
1091 1091  
1092 1092  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1093 -This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
1044 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.
1094 1094  
1095 1095  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1096 1096  
1097 ------
1048 +---
1098 1098  
1099 1099  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1100 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
1051 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
1052 +
1101 1101  {{/expand}}
1102 1102  
1103 1103  
... ... @@ -1104,19 +1104,17 @@
1104 1104  = Crime and Substance Abuse =
1105 1105  
1106 1106  == Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1107 -
1108 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1059 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1109 1109  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1110 1110  **Date of Publication:** *2003*
1111 1111  **Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1112 1112  **Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1113 1113  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1114 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1065 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1115 1115  
1116 ------
1067 +---
1117 1117  
1118 -## **Key Statistics**##
1119 -
1069 +## **Key Statistics**
1120 1120  1. **General Observations:**
1121 1121   - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1122 1122   - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
... ... @@ -1129,10 +1129,9 @@
1129 1129   - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1130 1130   - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1131 1131  
1132 ------
1082 +---
1133 1133  
1134 -## **Findings**##
1135 -
1084 +## **Findings**
1136 1136  1. **Primary Observations:**
1137 1137   - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1138 1138   - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
... ... @@ -1145,10 +1145,9 @@
1145 1145   - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1146 1146   - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1147 1147  
1148 ------
1097 +---
1149 1149  
1150 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1151 -
1099 +## **Critique and Observations**
1152 1152  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1153 1153   - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1154 1154   - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
... ... @@ -1161,48 +1161,46 @@
1161 1161   - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1162 1162   - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1163 1163  
1164 ------
1112 +---
1165 1165  
1166 1166  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1167 1167  - Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1168 1168  - Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1169 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1117 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1170 1170  
1171 ------
1119 +---
1172 1172  
1173 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1174 -
1121 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1175 1175  1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1176 1176  2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1177 1177  3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1178 1178  
1179 ------
1126 +---
1180 1180  
1181 1181  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1182 -This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
1129 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1183 1183  
1184 1184  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1185 1185  
1186 ------
1133 +---
1187 1187  
1188 1188  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1189 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
1136 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1137 +
1190 1190  {{/expand}}
1191 1191  
1192 1192  == Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1193 -
1194 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1141 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1195 1195  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1196 1196  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
1197 1197  **Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1198 1198  **Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1199 1199  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1200 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1147 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1201 1201  
1202 ------
1149 +---
1203 1203  
1204 -## **Key Statistics**##
1205 -
1151 +## **Key Statistics**
1206 1206  1. **General Observations:**
1207 1207   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1208 1208   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -1215,10 +1215,9 @@
1215 1215   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1216 1216   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1217 1217  
1218 ------
1164 +---
1219 1219  
1220 -## **Findings**##
1221 -
1166 +## **Findings**
1222 1222  1. **Primary Observations:**
1223 1223   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1224 1224   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -1231,10 +1231,9 @@
1231 1231   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1232 1232   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1233 1233  
1234 ------
1179 +---
1235 1235  
1236 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1237 -
1181 +## **Critique and Observations**
1238 1238  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1239 1239   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1240 1240   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1247,48 +1247,46 @@
1247 1247   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1248 1248   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1249 1249  
1250 ------
1194 +---
1251 1251  
1252 1252  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1253 1253  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1254 1254  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1255 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1199 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1256 1256  
1257 ------
1201 +---
1258 1258  
1259 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1260 -
1203 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1261 1261  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1262 1262  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1263 1263  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1264 1264  
1265 ------
1208 +---
1266 1266  
1267 1267  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1268 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1211 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1269 1269  
1270 1270  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1271 1271  
1272 ------
1215 +---
1273 1273  
1274 1274  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1275 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1218 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1219 +
1276 1276  {{/expand}}
1277 1277  
1278 1278  == Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1279 -
1280 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1223 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1281 1281  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1282 1282  **Date of Publication:** *2003*
1283 1283  **Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1284 1284  **Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1285 1285  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1286 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1229 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1287 1287  
1288 ------
1231 +---
1289 1289  
1290 -## **Key Statistics**##
1291 -
1233 +## **Key Statistics**
1292 1292  1. **General Observations:**
1293 1293   - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1294 1294   - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
... ... @@ -1301,10 +1301,9 @@
1301 1301   - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1302 1302   - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1303 1303  
1304 ------
1246 +---
1305 1305  
1306 -## **Findings**##
1307 -
1248 +## **Findings**
1308 1308  1. **Primary Observations:**
1309 1309   - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1310 1310   - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
... ... @@ -1317,10 +1317,9 @@
1317 1317   - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1318 1318   - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1319 1319  
1320 ------
1261 +---
1321 1321  
1322 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1323 -
1263 +## **Critique and Observations**
1324 1324  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1325 1325   - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1326 1326   - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
... ... @@ -1333,49 +1333,47 @@
1333 1333   - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1334 1334   - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1335 1335  
1336 ------
1276 +---
1337 1337  
1338 1338  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1339 1339  - Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1340 1340  - Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1341 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1281 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1342 1342  
1343 ------
1283 +---
1344 1344  
1345 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1346 -
1285 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1347 1347  1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1348 1348  2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1349 1349  3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1350 1350  
1351 ------
1290 +---
1352 1352  
1353 1353  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1354 -This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
1293 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1355 1355  
1356 1356  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1357 1357  
1358 ------
1297 +---
1359 1359  
1360 1360  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1361 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
1300 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1301 +
1362 1362  {{/expand}}
1363 1363  
1364 1364  
1365 1365  == Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1366 -
1367 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1306 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1368 1368  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1369 1369  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
1370 1370  **Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1371 1371  **Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1372 1372  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1373 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1312 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1374 1374  
1375 ------
1314 +---
1376 1376  
1377 -## **Key Statistics**##
1378 -
1316 +## **Key Statistics**
1379 1379  1. **General Observations:**
1380 1380   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1381 1381   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -1388,10 +1388,9 @@
1388 1388   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1389 1389   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1390 1390  
1391 ------
1329 +---
1392 1392  
1393 -## **Findings**##
1394 -
1331 +## **Findings**
1395 1395  1. **Primary Observations:**
1396 1396   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1397 1397   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -1404,10 +1404,9 @@
1404 1404   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1405 1405   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1406 1406  
1407 ------
1344 +---
1408 1408  
1409 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1410 -
1346 +## **Critique and Observations**
1411 1411  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1412 1412   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1413 1413   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1420,38 +1420,36 @@
1420 1420   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1421 1421   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1422 1422  
1423 ------
1359 +---
1424 1424  
1425 1425  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1426 1426  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1427 1427  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1428 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1364 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1429 1429  
1430 ------
1366 +---
1431 1431  
1432 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1433 -
1368 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1434 1434  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1435 1435  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1436 1436  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1437 1437  
1438 ------
1373 +---
1439 1439  
1440 1440  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1441 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1376 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1442 1442  
1443 1443  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1444 1444  
1445 ------
1380 +---
1446 1446  
1447 1447  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1448 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1383 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1384 +
1449 1449  {{/expand}}
1450 1450  
1451 1451  == Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults ==
1452 -
1453 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1454 - Source: Addictive Behaviors
1388 +{{expand title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" expanded="false"}} Source: Addictive Behaviors
1455 1455  Date of Publication: 2016
1456 1456  Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
1457 1457  Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
... ... @@ -1512,23 +1512,22 @@
1512 1512  
1513 1513  📄 Download Full Study
1514 1514  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
1449 +
1515 1515  {{/expand}}
1516 1516  
1517 1517  
1518 1518  == Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time? ==
1519 -
1520 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1454 +{{expand title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?" expanded="false"}}
1521 1521  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1522 1522  **Date of Publication:** *2014*
1523 1523  **Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1524 1524  **Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1525 1525  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1526 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1460 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
1527 1527  
1528 ------
1462 +---
1529 1529  
1530 -## **Key Statistics**##
1531 -
1464 +## **Key Statistics**
1532 1532  1. **General Observations:**
1533 1533   - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1534 1534   - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
... ... @@ -1541,10 +1541,9 @@
1541 1541   - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1542 1542   - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1543 1543  
1544 ------
1477 +---
1545 1545  
1546 -## **Findings**##
1547 -
1479 +## **Findings**
1548 1548  1. **Primary Observations:**
1549 1549   - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1550 1550   - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
... ... @@ -1557,10 +1557,9 @@
1557 1557   - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1558 1558   - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1559 1559  
1560 ------
1492 +---
1561 1561  
1562 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1563 -
1494 +## **Critique and Observations**
1564 1564  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1565 1565   - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1566 1566   - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
... ... @@ -1573,32 +1573,32 @@
1573 1573   - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1574 1574   - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1575 1575  
1576 ------
1507 +---
1577 1577  
1578 1578  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1579 1579  - Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1580 1580  - Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1581 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1512 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
1582 1582  
1583 ------
1514 +---
1584 1584  
1585 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1586 -
1516 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1587 1587  1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1588 1588  2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1589 1589  3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1590 1590  
1591 ------
1521 +---
1592 1592  
1593 1593  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1594 -This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.  ##
1524 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.
1595 1595  
1596 1596  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1597 1597  
1598 ------
1528 +---
1599 1599  
1600 1600  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1601 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
1531 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
1532 +
1602 1602  {{/expand}}
1603 1603  
1604 1604  
... ... @@ -1608,19 +1608,17 @@
1608 1608  = Whiteness =
1609 1609  
1610 1610  == Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports ==
1611 -
1612 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1542 +{{expand title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports" expanded="false"}}
1613 1613  **Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1614 1614  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
1615 1615  **Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1616 1616  **Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1617 1617  **DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1618 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1548 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
1619 1619  
1620 ------
1550 +---
1621 1621  
1622 -## **Key Statistics**##
1623 -
1552 +## **Key Statistics**
1624 1624  1. **General Observations:**
1625 1625   - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1626 1626   - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
... ... @@ -1633,10 +1633,9 @@
1633 1633   - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1634 1634   - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1635 1635  
1636 ------
1565 +---
1637 1637  
1638 -## **Findings**##
1639 -
1567 +## **Findings**
1640 1640  1. **Primary Observations:**
1641 1641   - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1642 1642   - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
... ... @@ -1649,10 +1649,9 @@
1649 1649   - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1650 1650   - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1651 1651  
1652 ------
1580 +---
1653 1653  
1654 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1655 -
1582 +## **Critique and Observations**
1656 1656  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1657 1657   - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1658 1658   - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
... ... @@ -1665,32 +1665,32 @@
1665 1665   - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1666 1666   - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1667 1667  
1668 ------
1595 +---
1669 1669  
1670 1670  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1671 1671  - Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1672 1672  - Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1673 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1600 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
1674 1674  
1675 ------
1602 +---
1676 1676  
1677 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1678 -
1604 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1679 1679  1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1680 1680  2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1681 1681  3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1682 1682  
1683 ------
1609 +---
1684 1684  
1685 1685  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1686 -This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
1612 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.
1687 1687  
1688 1688  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1689 1689  
1690 ------
1616 +---
1691 1691  
1692 1692  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1693 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
1619 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
1620 +
1694 1694  {{/expand}}
1695 1695  
1696 1696  
... ... @@ -1700,19 +1700,17 @@
1700 1700  = White Guilt =
1701 1701  
1702 1702  == Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations ==
1703 -
1704 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1630 +{{expand title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations" expanded="false"}}
1705 1705  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1706 1706  **Date of Publication:** *2016*
1707 1707  **Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1708 1708  **Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1709 1709  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1710 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1636 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1711 1711  
1712 ------
1638 +---
1713 1713  
1714 -## **Key Statistics**##
1715 -
1640 +## **Key Statistics**
1716 1716  1. **General Observations:**
1717 1717   - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1718 1718   - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
... ... @@ -1725,10 +1725,9 @@
1725 1725   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1726 1726   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1727 1727  
1728 ------
1653 +---
1729 1729  
1730 -## **Findings**##
1731 -
1655 +## **Findings**
1732 1732  1. **Primary Observations:**
1733 1733   - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1734 1734   - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
... ... @@ -1741,10 +1741,9 @@
1741 1741   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1742 1742   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1743 1743  
1744 ------
1668 +---
1745 1745  
1746 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1747 -
1670 +## **Critique and Observations**
1748 1748  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1749 1749   - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1750 1750   - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
... ... @@ -1757,49 +1757,47 @@
1757 1757   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1758 1758   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1759 1759  
1760 ------
1683 +---
1761 1761  
1762 1762  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1763 1763  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1764 1764  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1765 -- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1688 +- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1766 1766  
1767 ------
1690 +---
1768 1768  
1769 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1770 -
1692 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1771 1771  1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1772 1772  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1773 1773  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1774 1774  
1775 ------
1697 +---
1776 1776  
1777 1777  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1778 -This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
1700 +This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.
1779 1779  
1780 1780  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1781 1781  
1782 ------
1704 +---
1783 1783  
1784 1784  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1785 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
1707 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1708 +
1786 1786  {{/expand}}
1787 1787  
1788 1788  
1789 1789  == Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans ==
1790 -
1791 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1713 +{{expand title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans" expanded="false"}}
1792 1792  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1793 1793  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
1794 1794  **Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1795 1795  **Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1796 1796  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1797 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1719 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1798 1798  
1799 ------
1721 +---
1800 1800  
1801 -## **Key Statistics**##
1802 -
1723 +## **Key Statistics**
1803 1803  1. **General Observations:**
1804 1804   - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1805 1805   - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
... ... @@ -1812,10 +1812,9 @@
1812 1812   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1813 1813   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1814 1814  
1815 ------
1736 +---
1816 1816  
1817 -## **Findings**##
1818 -
1738 +## **Findings**
1819 1819  1. **Primary Observations:**
1820 1820   - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1821 1821   - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
... ... @@ -1828,10 +1828,9 @@
1828 1828   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1829 1829   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1830 1830  
1831 ------
1751 +---
1832 1832  
1833 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1834 -
1753 +## **Critique and Observations**
1835 1835  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1836 1836   - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1837 1837   - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
... ... @@ -1844,48 +1844,46 @@
1844 1844   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1845 1845   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1846 1846  
1847 ------
1766 +---
1848 1848  
1849 1849  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1850 1850  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1851 1851  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1852 -- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1771 +- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1853 1853  
1854 ------
1773 +---
1855 1855  
1856 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1857 -
1775 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1858 1858  1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1859 1859  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1860 1860  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1861 1861  
1862 ------
1780 +---
1863 1863  
1864 1864  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1865 -This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
1783 +This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.
1866 1866  
1867 1867  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1868 1868  
1869 ------
1787 +---
1870 1870  
1871 1871  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1872 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
1790 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1791 +
1873 1873  {{/expand}}
1874 1874  
1875 1875  == Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities? ==
1876 -
1877 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1795 +{{expand title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?" expanded="false"}}
1878 1878  **Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1879 1879  **Date of Publication:** *2023*
1880 1880  **Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1881 1881  **Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1882 1882  **DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1883 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1801 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1884 1884  
1885 ------
1803 +---
1886 1886  
1887 -## **Key Statistics**##
1888 -
1805 +## **Key Statistics**
1889 1889  1. **General Observations:**
1890 1890   - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1891 1891   - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
... ... @@ -1898,10 +1898,9 @@
1898 1898   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1899 1899   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1900 1900  
1901 ------
1818 +---
1902 1902  
1903 -## **Findings**##
1904 -
1820 +## **Findings**
1905 1905  1. **Primary Observations:**
1906 1906   - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1907 1907   - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
... ... @@ -1914,10 +1914,9 @@
1914 1914   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1915 1915   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1916 1916  
1917 ------
1833 +---
1918 1918  
1919 -## **Critique and Observations**##
1920 -
1835 +## **Critique and Observations**
1921 1921  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1922 1922   - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1923 1923   - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
... ... @@ -1930,32 +1930,32 @@
1930 1930   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1931 1931   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1932 1932  
1933 ------
1848 +---
1934 1934  
1935 1935  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1936 1936  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1937 1937  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1938 -- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
1853 +- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1939 1939  
1940 ------
1855 +---
1941 1941  
1942 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1943 -
1857 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1944 1944  1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1945 1945  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1946 1946  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1947 1947  
1948 ------
1862 +---
1949 1949  
1950 1950  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1951 -This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
1865 +This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.
1952 1952  
1953 1953  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1954 1954  
1955 ------
1869 +---
1956 1956  
1957 1957  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1958 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
1872 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1873 +
1959 1959  {{/expand}}
1960 1960  
1961 1961  
... ... @@ -1963,19 +1963,17 @@
1963 1963  = Media =
1964 1964  
1965 1965  == Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic ==
1966 -
1967 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"}}
1881 +{{expand title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict" expanded="false"}}
1968 1968  **Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1969 1969  **Date of Publication:** *2021*
1970 1970  **Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1971 1971  **Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1972 1972  **DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1973 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1887 +**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*
1974 1974  
1975 ------
1889 +---
1976 1976  
1977 -## **Key Statistics**##
1978 -
1891 +## **Key Statistics**
1979 1979  1. **General Observations:**
1980 1980   - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1981 1981   - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
... ... @@ -1988,10 +1988,9 @@
1988 1988   - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1989 1989   - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1990 1990  
1991 ------
1904 +---
1992 1992  
1993 -## **Findings**##
1994 -
1906 +## **Findings**
1995 1995  1. **Primary Observations:**
1996 1996   - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1997 1997   - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
... ... @@ -2004,10 +2004,9 @@
2004 2004   - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
2005 2005   - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
2006 2006  
2007 ------
1919 +---
2008 2008  
2009 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2010 -
1921 +## **Critique and Observations**
2011 2011  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2012 2012   - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
2013 2013   - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
... ... @@ -2020,47 +2020,45 @@
2020 2020   - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
2021 2021   - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
2022 2022  
2023 ------
1934 +---
2024 2024  
2025 2025  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2026 2026  - Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
2027 2027  - Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
2028 -- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
1939 +- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
2029 2029  
2030 ------
1941 +---
2031 2031  
2032 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2033 -
1943 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2034 2034  1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
2035 2035  2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
2036 2036  3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
2037 2037  
2038 ------
1948 +---
2039 2039  
2040 2040  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2041 -This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
1951 +This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.
2042 2042  
2043 ------
1953 +---
2044 2044  
2045 2045  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2046 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
1956 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
1957 +
2047 2047  {{/expand}}
2048 2048  
2049 2049  
2050 2050  == Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions ==
2051 -
2052 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
1962 +{{expand title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions" expanded="false"}}
2053 2053  **Source:** *Politics & Policy*
2054 2054  **Date of Publication:** *2007*
2055 2055  **Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
2056 2056  **Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
2057 2057  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
2058 -**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
1968 +**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*
2059 2059  
2060 ------
1970 +---
2061 2061  
2062 -## **Key Statistics**##
2063 -
1972 +## **Key Statistics**
2064 2064  1. **General Observations:**
2065 2065   - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
2066 2066   - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
... ... @@ -2073,10 +2073,9 @@
2073 2073   - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
2074 2074   - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
2075 2075  
2076 ------
1985 +---
2077 2077  
2078 -## **Findings**##
2079 -
1987 +## **Findings**
2080 2080  1. **Primary Observations:**
2081 2081   - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
2082 2082   - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
... ... @@ -2089,10 +2089,9 @@
2089 2089   - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
2090 2090   - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
2091 2091  
2092 ------
2000 +---
2093 2093  
2094 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2095 -
2002 +## **Critique and Observations**
2096 2096  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2097 2097   - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
2098 2098   - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
... ... @@ -2105,46 +2105,44 @@
2105 2105   - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
2106 2106   - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
2107 2107  
2108 ------
2015 +---
2109 2109  
2110 2110  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2111 2111  - Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
2112 2112  - Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
2113 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
2020 +- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.
2114 2114  
2115 ------
2022 +---
2116 2116  
2117 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2118 -
2024 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2119 2119  1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
2120 2120  2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
2121 2121  3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
2122 2122  
2123 ------
2029 +---
2124 2124  
2125 2125  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2126 -This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
2032 +This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.
2127 2127  
2128 ------
2034 +---
2129 2129  
2130 2130  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2131 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
2037 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]
2038 +
2132 2132  {{/expand}}
2133 2133  
2134 2134  == Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion ==
2135 -
2136 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
2042 +{{expand title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion" expanded="false"}}
2137 2137  **Source:** *Journal of Communication*
2138 2138  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
2139 2139  **Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
2140 2140  **Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
2141 2141  **DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2142 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
2048 +**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*
2143 2143  
2144 ------
2050 +---
2145 2145  
2146 -## **Key Statistics**##
2147 -
2052 +## **Key Statistics**
2148 2148  1. **General Observations:**
2149 2149   - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
2150 2150   - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
... ... @@ -2157,10 +2157,9 @@
2157 2157   - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
2158 2158   - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
2159 2159  
2160 ------
2065 +---
2161 2161  
2162 -## **Findings**##
2163 -
2067 +## **Findings**
2164 2164  1. **Primary Observations:**
2165 2165   - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
2166 2166   - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
... ... @@ -2173,10 +2173,9 @@
2173 2173   - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
2174 2174   - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
2175 2175  
2176 ------
2080 +---
2177 2177  
2178 -## **Critique and Observations**##
2179 -
2082 +## **Critique and Observations**
2180 2180  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2181 2181   - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
2182 2182   - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
... ... @@ -2189,31 +2189,31 @@
2189 2189   - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
2190 2190   - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
2191 2191  
2192 ------
2095 +---
2193 2193  
2194 2194  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2195 2195  - Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
2196 2196  - Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
2197 -- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
2100 +- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
2198 2198  
2199 ------
2102 +---
2200 2200  
2201 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2202 -
2104 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2203 2203  1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
2204 2204  2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
2205 2205  3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
2206 2206  
2207 ------
2109 +---
2208 2208  
2209 2209  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2210 -This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
2112 +This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.
2211 2211  
2212 ------
2114 +---
2213 2213  
2214 2214  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2215 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
2117 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
2118 +
2216 2216  {{/expand}}
2217 2217  
2218 2218  
2219 -
2122 +