0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 77.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 06:43
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 78.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 06:43
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -18,17 +18,19 @@
18 18  = Genetics =
19 19  
20 20  == Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History ==
21 -{{expand title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History" expanded="false"}}
21 +
22 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
22 22  **Source:** *Nature*
23 23  **Date of Publication:** *2009*
24 24  **Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
25 25  **Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
26 26  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
27 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*
28 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
28 28  
29 ----
30 +-----
30 30  
31 -## **Key Statistics**
32 +## **Key Statistics**##
33 +
32 32  1. **General Observations:**
33 33   - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
34 34   - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
... ... @@ -41,9 +41,10 @@
41 41   - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
42 42   - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
43 43  
44 ----
46 +-----
45 45  
46 -## **Findings**
48 +## **Findings**##
49 +
47 47  1. **Primary Observations:**
48 48   - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
49 49   - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
... ... @@ -56,9 +56,10 @@
56 56   - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
57 57   - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
58 58  
59 ----
62 +-----
60 60  
61 -## **Critique and Observations**
64 +## **Critique and Observations**##
65 +
62 62  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
63 63   - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
64 64   - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
... ... @@ -71,48 +71,50 @@
71 71   - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
72 72   - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
73 73  
74 ----
78 +-----
75 75  
76 76  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
77 77  - Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
78 78  - Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
79 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
83 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
80 80  
81 ----
85 +-----
82 82  
83 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
87 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
88 +
84 84  1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
85 85  2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
86 86  3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
87 87  
88 ----
93 +-----
89 89  
90 90  ## **Summary of Research Study**
91 -This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.
96 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
92 92  
93 93  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
94 94  
95 ----
100 +-----
96 96  
97 97  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
98 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
99 -
103 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
100 100  {{/expand}}
101 101  
102 102  
103 103  
104 104  == Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations ==
105 -{{expand title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations" expanded="false"}}
109 +
110 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
106 106  **Source:** *Nature*
107 107  **Date of Publication:** *2016*
108 108  **Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
109 109  **Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
110 110  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
111 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
116 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
112 112  
113 ----
118 +-----
114 114  
115 -## **Key Statistics**
120 +## **Key Statistics**##
121 +
116 116  1. **General Observations:**
117 117   - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
118 118   - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
... ... @@ -125,9 +125,10 @@
125 125   - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
126 126   - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
127 127  
128 ----
134 +-----
129 129  
130 -## **Findings**
136 +## **Findings**##
137 +
131 131  1. **Primary Observations:**
132 132   - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
133 133   - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
... ... @@ -140,9 +140,10 @@
140 140   - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
141 141   - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
142 142  
143 ----
150 +-----
144 144  
145 -## **Critique and Observations**
152 +## **Critique and Observations**##
153 +
146 146  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
147 147   - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
148 148   - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
... ... @@ -155,47 +155,49 @@
155 155   - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
156 156   - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
157 157  
158 ----
166 +-----
159 159  
160 160  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
161 161  - Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
162 162  - Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
163 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
171 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
164 164  
165 ----
173 +-----
166 166  
167 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
175 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
176 +
168 168  1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
169 169  2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
170 170  3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
171 171  
172 ----
181 +-----
173 173  
174 174  ## **Summary of Research Study**
175 -This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.
184 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
176 176  
177 177  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
178 178  
179 ----
188 +-----
180 180  
181 181  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
182 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
183 -
191 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
184 184  {{/expand}}
185 185  
186 186  
187 187  == Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies ==
188 -{{expand title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies" expanded="false"}}
196 +
197 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
189 189  **Source:** *Nature Genetics*
190 190  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
191 191  **Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
192 192  **Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
193 193  **DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
194 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
203 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
195 195  
196 ----
205 +-----
197 197  
198 -## **Key Statistics**
207 +## **Key Statistics**##
208 +
199 199  1. **General Observations:**
200 200   - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
201 201   - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
... ... @@ -208,15 +208,16 @@
208 208   - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
209 209   - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
210 210  
211 ----
221 +-----
212 212  
213 -## **Findings**
223 +## **Findings**##
224 +
214 214  1. **Primary Observations:**
215 215   - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
216 216   - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
217 217  
218 218  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
219 - - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (~70-80%)**.
230 + - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (70-80%)**.
220 220   - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
221 221  
222 222  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
... ... @@ -223,9 +223,10 @@
223 223   - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
224 224   - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
225 225  
226 ----
237 +-----
227 227  
228 -## **Critique and Observations**
239 +## **Critique and Observations**##
240 +
229 229  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
230 230   - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
231 231   - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
... ... @@ -238,47 +238,49 @@
238 238   - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
239 239   - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
240 240  
241 ----
253 +-----
242 242  
243 243  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
244 244  - Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
245 245  - Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
246 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
258 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
247 247  
248 ----
260 +-----
249 249  
250 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
262 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
263 +
251 251  1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
252 252  2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
253 253  3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
254 254  
255 ----
268 +-----
256 256  
257 257  ## **Summary of Research Study**
258 -This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.
271 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
259 259  
260 260  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
261 261  
262 ----
275 +-----
263 263  
264 264  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
265 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
266 -
278 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
267 267  {{/expand}}
268 268  
269 269  
270 270  == Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease ==
271 -{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}}
283 +
284 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
272 272  **Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
273 273  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
274 274  **Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
275 275  **Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
276 276  **DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
277 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*
290 +**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
278 278  
279 ----
292 +-----
280 280  
281 -## **Key Statistics**
294 +## **Key Statistics**##
295 +
282 282  1. **General Observations:**
283 283   - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
284 284   - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
... ... @@ -291,9 +291,10 @@
291 291   - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
292 292   - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
293 293  
294 ----
308 +-----
295 295  
296 -## **Findings**
310 +## **Findings**##
311 +
297 297  1. **Primary Observations:**
298 298   - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
299 299   - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
... ... @@ -306,9 +306,10 @@
306 306   - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
307 307   - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
308 308  
309 ----
324 +-----
310 310  
311 -## **Critique and Observations**
326 +## **Critique and Observations**##
327 +
312 312  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
313 313   - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
314 314   - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
... ... @@ -321,47 +321,49 @@
321 321   - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
322 322   - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
323 323  
324 ----
340 +-----
325 325  
326 326  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
327 327  - Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
328 328  - Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
329 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
345 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
330 330  
331 ----
347 +-----
332 332  
333 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
349 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
350 +
334 334  1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
335 335  2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
336 336  3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
337 337  
338 ----
355 +-----
339 339  
340 340  ## **Summary of Research Study**
341 -This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.
358 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
342 342  
343 343  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
344 344  
345 ----
362 +-----
346 346  
347 347  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
348 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
349 -
365 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
350 350  {{/expand}}
351 351  
352 352  
353 353  == Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA ==
354 -{{expand title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA" expanded="false"}}
370 +
371 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
355 355  **Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
356 356  **Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
357 357  **Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
358 358  **Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
359 359  **DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
360 -**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*
377 +**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
361 361  
362 ----
379 +-----
363 363  
364 -## **Key Statistics**
381 +## **Key Statistics**##
382 +
365 365  1. **General Observations:**
366 366   - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
367 367   - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
... ... @@ -374,9 +374,10 @@
374 374   - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
375 375   - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
376 376  
377 ----
395 +-----
378 378  
379 -## **Findings**
397 +## **Findings**##
398 +
380 380  1. **Primary Observations:**
381 381   - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
382 382   - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
... ... @@ -390,9 +390,10 @@
390 390   - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
391 391   - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
392 392  
393 ----
412 +-----
394 394  
395 -## **Critique and Observations**
414 +## **Critique and Observations**##
415 +
396 396  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
397 397   - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
398 398   - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
... ... @@ -405,44 +405,46 @@
405 405   - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
406 406   - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
407 407  
408 ----
428 +-----
409 409  
410 410  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
411 411  - Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
412 412  - Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
413 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.
433 +- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
414 414  
415 ----
435 +-----
416 416  
417 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
437 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
438 +
418 418  1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
419 419  2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
420 420  3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
421 421  
422 ----
443 +-----
423 423  
424 424  ## **Summary of Research Study**
425 -This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.
446 +This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
426 426  
427 ----
448 +-----
428 428  
429 429  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
430 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]
431 -
451 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
432 432  {{/expand}}
433 433  
434 434  == Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age ==
435 -{{expand title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age" expanded="false"}}
455 +
456 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
436 436  **Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
437 437  **Date of Publication:** *2013*
438 438  **Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
439 439  **Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
440 440  **DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
441 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
462 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
442 442  
443 ----
464 +-----
444 444  
445 -## **Key Statistics**
466 +## **Key Statistics**##
467 +
446 446  1. **General Observations:**
447 447   - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
448 448   - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
... ... @@ -455,9 +455,10 @@
455 455   - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
456 456   - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
457 457  
458 ----
480 +-----
459 459  
460 -## **Findings**
482 +## **Findings**##
483 +
461 461  1. **Primary Observations:**
462 462   - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
463 463   - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
... ... @@ -470,9 +470,10 @@
470 470   - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
471 471   - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
472 472  
473 ----
496 +-----
474 474  
475 -## **Critique and Observations**
498 +## **Critique and Observations**##
499 +
476 476  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
477 477   - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
478 478   - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
... ... @@ -485,46 +485,48 @@
485 485   - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
486 486   - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
487 487  
488 ----
512 +-----
489 489  
490 490  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
491 491  - Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
492 492  - Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
493 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
517 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
494 494  
495 ----
519 +-----
496 496  
497 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
521 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
522 +
498 498  1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
499 499  2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
500 500  3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
501 501  
502 ----
527 +-----
503 503  
504 504  ## **Summary of Research Study**
505 -This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.
530 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
506 506  
507 507  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
508 508  
509 ----
534 +-----
510 510  
511 511  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
512 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
513 -
537 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
514 514  {{/expand}}
515 515  
516 516  == Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications ==
517 -{{expand title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications" expanded="false"}}
541 +
542 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
518 518  **Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
519 519  **Date of Publication:** *2010*
520 520  **Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
521 521  **Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
522 522  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
523 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
548 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
524 524  
525 ----
550 +-----
526 526  
527 -## **Key Statistics**
552 +## **Key Statistics**##
553 +
528 528  1. **General Observations:**
529 529   - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
530 530   - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
... ... @@ -537,9 +537,10 @@
537 537   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
538 538   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
539 539  
540 ----
566 +-----
541 541  
542 -## **Findings**
568 +## **Findings**##
569 +
543 543  1. **Primary Observations:**
544 544   - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
545 545   - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
... ... @@ -552,9 +552,10 @@
552 552   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
553 553   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
554 554  
555 ----
582 +-----
556 556  
557 -## **Critique and Observations**
584 +## **Critique and Observations**##
585 +
558 558  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
559 559   - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
560 560   - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
... ... @@ -567,47 +567,49 @@
567 567   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
568 568   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
569 569  
570 ----
598 +-----
571 571  
572 572  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
573 573  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
574 574  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
575 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
603 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
576 576  
577 ----
605 +-----
578 578  
579 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
607 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
608 +
580 580  1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
581 581  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
582 582  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
583 583  
584 ----
613 +-----
585 585  
586 586  ## **Summary of Research Study**
587 -This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.
616 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
588 588  
589 589  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
590 590  
591 ----
620 +-----
592 592  
593 593  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
594 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
595 -
623 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
596 596  {{/expand}}
597 597  
598 598  
599 599  == Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media ==
600 -{{expand title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media" expanded="false"}}
628 +
629 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
601 601  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
602 602  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
603 603  **Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
604 604  **Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
605 605  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
606 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
635 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
607 607  
608 ----
637 +-----
609 609  
610 -## **Key Statistics**
639 +## **Key Statistics**##
640 +
611 611  1. **General Observations:**
612 612   - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
613 613   - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
... ... @@ -620,9 +620,10 @@
620 620   - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
621 621   - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
622 622  
623 ----
653 +-----
624 624  
625 -## **Findings**
655 +## **Findings**##
656 +
626 626  1. **Primary Observations:**
627 627   - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
628 628   - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
... ... @@ -635,9 +635,10 @@
635 635   - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
636 636   - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
637 637  
638 ----
669 +-----
639 639  
640 -## **Critique and Observations**
671 +## **Critique and Observations**##
672 +
641 641  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
642 642   - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
643 643   - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
... ... @@ -650,47 +650,49 @@
650 650   - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
651 651   - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
652 652  
653 ----
685 +-----
654 654  
655 655  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
656 656  - Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
657 657  - Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
658 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
690 +- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
659 659  
660 ----
692 +-----
661 661  
662 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
694 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
695 +
663 663  1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
664 664  2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
665 665  3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
666 666  
667 ----
700 +-----
668 668  
669 669  ## **Summary of Research Study**
670 -This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.
703 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
671 671  
672 672  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
673 673  
674 ----
707 +-----
675 675  
676 676  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
677 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
678 -
710 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
679 679  {{/expand}}
680 680  
681 681  
682 682  == Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation ==
683 -{{expand title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation" expanded="false"}}
715 +
716 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
684 684  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
685 685  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
686 686  **Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
687 687  **Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
688 688  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
689 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
722 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
690 690  
691 ----
724 +-----
692 692  
693 -## **Key Statistics**
726 +## **Key Statistics**##
727 +
694 694  1. **General Observations:**
695 695   - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
696 696   - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
... ... @@ -703,9 +703,10 @@
703 703   - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
704 704   - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
705 705  
706 ----
740 +-----
707 707  
708 -## **Findings**
742 +## **Findings**##
743 +
709 709  1. **Primary Observations:**
710 710   - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
711 711   - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
... ... @@ -718,9 +718,10 @@
718 718   - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
719 719   - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
720 720  
721 ----
756 +-----
722 722  
723 -## **Critique and Observations**
758 +## **Critique and Observations**##
759 +
724 724  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
725 725   - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
726 726   - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
... ... @@ -733,35 +733,36 @@
733 733   - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
734 734   - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
735 735  
736 ----
772 +-----
737 737  
738 738  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
739 739  - Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
740 740  - Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
741 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
777 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
742 742  
743 ----
779 +-----
744 744  
745 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
781 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
782 +
746 746  1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
747 747  2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
748 748  3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
749 749  
750 ----
787 +-----
751 751  
752 752  ## **Summary of Research Study**
753 -This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.
790 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.  ##
754 754  
755 755  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
756 756  
757 ----
794 +-----
758 758  
759 759  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
760 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
761 -
797 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
762 762  {{/expand}}
763 763  
764 764  == Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding ==
801 +
765 765  {{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
766 766  **Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
767 767  **Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
... ... @@ -768,7 +768,7 @@
768 768  **Author(s):** Smith et al.
769 769  **Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
770 770  **DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
771 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
808 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science 
772 772  
773 773  **Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
774 774  
... ... @@ -794,22 +794,24 @@
794 794  {{/expand}}
795 795  
796 796  
797 ----
834 +-----
798 798  
799 799  = Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
800 800  
801 801  == Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018 ==
802 -{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}}
839 +
840 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
803 803  **Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
804 804  **Date of Publication:** *2020*
805 805  **Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
806 806  **Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
807 807  **DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
808 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*
846 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
809 809  
810 ----
848 +-----
811 811  
812 -## **Key Statistics**
850 +## **Key Statistics**##
851 +
813 813  1. **General Observations:**
814 814   - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
815 815   - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
... ... @@ -822,9 +822,10 @@
822 822   - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
823 823   - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
824 824  
825 ----
864 +-----
826 826  
827 -## **Findings**
866 +## **Findings**##
867 +
828 828  1. **Primary Observations:**
829 829   - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
830 830   - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
... ... @@ -837,9 +837,10 @@
837 837   - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
838 838   - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
839 839  
840 ----
880 +-----
841 841  
842 -## **Critique and Observations**
882 +## **Critique and Observations**##
883 +
843 843  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
844 844   - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
845 845   - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
... ... @@ -852,26 +852,27 @@
852 852   - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
853 853   - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
854 854  
855 ----
896 +-----
856 856  
857 857  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
858 858  - Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
859 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
900 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
860 860  
861 ----
902 +-----
862 862  
863 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
904 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
905 +
864 864  1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
865 865  2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
866 866  
867 ----
909 +-----
868 868  
869 869  ## **Summary of Research Study**
870 -This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.
912 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.  ##
871 871  
872 872  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
873 873  
874 ----
916 +-----
875 875  
876 876  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
877 877  {{velocity}}
... ... @@ -881,24 +881,24 @@
881 881  [[Download>>attach:$filename]]
882 882  #else
883 883  {{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
884 -#end
885 -{{/velocity}}
886 -
926 +#end {{/velocity}}##
887 887  {{/expand}}
888 888  
889 889  
890 890  == Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ==
891 -{{expand title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" expanded="false"}}
931 +
932 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
892 892  **Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
893 893  **Date of Publication:** *2012*
894 894  **Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
895 895  **Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
896 896  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
897 -**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*
938 +**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
898 898  
899 ----
940 +-----
900 900  
901 -## **Key Statistics**
942 +## **Key Statistics**##
943 +
902 902  1. **General Observations:**
903 903   - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
904 904   - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
... ... @@ -913,9 +913,10 @@
913 913   - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
914 914   - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
915 915  
916 ----
958 +-----
917 917  
918 -## **Findings**
960 +## **Findings**##
961 +
919 919  1. **Primary Observations:**
920 920   - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
921 921   - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
... ... @@ -928,9 +928,10 @@
928 928   - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
929 929   - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
930 930  
931 ----
974 +-----
932 932  
933 -## **Critique and Observations**
976 +## **Critique and Observations**##
977 +
934 934  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
935 935   - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
936 936   - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
... ... @@ -943,45 +943,47 @@
943 943   - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
944 944   - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
945 945  
946 ----
990 +-----
947 947  
948 948  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
949 949  - Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
950 950  - Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
951 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.
995 +- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
952 952  
953 ----
997 +-----
954 954  
955 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
999 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1000 +
956 956  1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
957 957  2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
958 958  3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
959 959  
960 ----
1005 +-----
961 961  
962 962  ## **Summary of Research Study**
963 -This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.
1008 +This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
964 964  
965 ----
1010 +-----
966 966  
967 967  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
968 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]
969 -
1013 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
970 970  {{/expand}}
971 971  
972 972  
973 973  == Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness ==
974 -{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}}
1018 +
1019 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
975 975  **Source:** *Current Psychology*
976 976  **Date of Publication:** *2024*
977 977  **Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
978 978  **Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
979 979  **DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
980 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
1025 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
981 981  
982 ----
1027 +-----
983 983  
984 -## **Key Statistics**
1029 +## **Key Statistics**##
1030 +
985 985  1. **General Observations:**
986 986   - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
987 987   - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
... ... @@ -994,9 +994,10 @@
994 994   - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
995 995   - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
996 996  
997 ----
1043 +-----
998 998  
999 -## **Findings**
1045 +## **Findings**##
1046 +
1000 1000  1. **Primary Observations:**
1001 1001   - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
1002 1002   - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
... ... @@ -1009,9 +1009,10 @@
1009 1009   - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
1010 1010   - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
1011 1011  
1012 ----
1059 +-----
1013 1013  
1014 -## **Critique and Observations**
1061 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1062 +
1015 1015  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1016 1016   - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
1017 1017   - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
... ... @@ -1024,32 +1024,32 @@
1024 1024   - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
1025 1025   - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
1026 1026  
1027 ----
1075 +-----
1028 1028  
1029 1029  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1030 1030  - Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
1031 1031  - Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
1032 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
1080 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
1033 1033  
1034 ----
1082 +-----
1035 1035  
1036 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1084 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1085 +
1037 1037  1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
1038 1038  2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
1039 1039  3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
1040 1040  
1041 ----
1090 +-----
1042 1042  
1043 1043  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1044 -This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.
1093 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
1045 1045  
1046 1046  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1047 1047  
1048 ----
1097 +-----
1049 1049  
1050 1050  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1051 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
1052 -
1100 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
1053 1053  {{/expand}}
1054 1054  
1055 1055  
... ... @@ -1056,17 +1056,19 @@
1056 1056  = Crime and Substance Abuse =
1057 1057  
1058 1058  == Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1059 -{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1107 +
1108 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1060 1060  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1061 1061  **Date of Publication:** *2003*
1062 1062  **Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1063 1063  **Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1064 1064  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1065 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1114 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1066 1066  
1067 ----
1116 +-----
1068 1068  
1069 -## **Key Statistics**
1118 +## **Key Statistics**##
1119 +
1070 1070  1. **General Observations:**
1071 1071   - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1072 1072   - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
... ... @@ -1079,9 +1079,10 @@
1079 1079   - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1080 1080   - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1081 1081  
1082 ----
1132 +-----
1083 1083  
1084 -## **Findings**
1134 +## **Findings**##
1135 +
1085 1085  1. **Primary Observations:**
1086 1086   - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1087 1087   - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
... ... @@ -1094,9 +1094,10 @@
1094 1094   - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1095 1095   - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1096 1096  
1097 ----
1148 +-----
1098 1098  
1099 -## **Critique and Observations**
1150 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1151 +
1100 1100  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1101 1101   - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1102 1102   - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
... ... @@ -1109,46 +1109,48 @@
1109 1109   - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1110 1110   - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1111 1111  
1112 ----
1164 +-----
1113 1113  
1114 1114  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1115 1115  - Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1116 1116  - Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1117 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1169 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1118 1118  
1119 ----
1171 +-----
1120 1120  
1121 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1173 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1174 +
1122 1122  1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1123 1123  2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1124 1124  3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1125 1125  
1126 ----
1179 +-----
1127 1127  
1128 1128  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1129 -This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1182 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
1130 1130  
1131 1131  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1132 1132  
1133 ----
1186 +-----
1134 1134  
1135 1135  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1136 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1137 -
1189 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
1138 1138  {{/expand}}
1139 1139  
1140 1140  == Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1141 -{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1193 +
1194 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1142 1142  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1143 1143  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
1144 1144  **Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1145 1145  **Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1146 1146  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1147 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1200 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1148 1148  
1149 ----
1202 +-----
1150 1150  
1151 -## **Key Statistics**
1204 +## **Key Statistics**##
1205 +
1152 1152  1. **General Observations:**
1153 1153   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1154 1154   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -1161,9 +1161,10 @@
1161 1161   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1162 1162   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1163 1163  
1164 ----
1218 +-----
1165 1165  
1166 -## **Findings**
1220 +## **Findings**##
1221 +
1167 1167  1. **Primary Observations:**
1168 1168   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1169 1169   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -1176,9 +1176,10 @@
1176 1176   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1177 1177   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1178 1178  
1179 ----
1234 +-----
1180 1180  
1181 -## **Critique and Observations**
1236 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1237 +
1182 1182  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1183 1183   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1184 1184   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1191,46 +1191,48 @@
1191 1191   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1192 1192   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1193 1193  
1194 ----
1250 +-----
1195 1195  
1196 1196  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1197 1197  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1198 1198  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1199 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1255 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1200 1200  
1201 ----
1257 +-----
1202 1202  
1203 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1259 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1260 +
1204 1204  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1205 1205  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1206 1206  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1207 1207  
1208 ----
1265 +-----
1209 1209  
1210 1210  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1211 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1268 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1212 1212  
1213 1213  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1214 1214  
1215 ----
1272 +-----
1216 1216  
1217 1217  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1218 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1219 -
1275 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1220 1220  {{/expand}}
1221 1221  
1222 1222  == Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1223 -{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1279 +
1280 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1224 1224  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1225 1225  **Date of Publication:** *2003*
1226 1226  **Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1227 1227  **Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1228 1228  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1229 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1286 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1230 1230  
1231 ----
1288 +-----
1232 1232  
1233 -## **Key Statistics**
1290 +## **Key Statistics**##
1291 +
1234 1234  1. **General Observations:**
1235 1235   - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1236 1236   - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
... ... @@ -1243,9 +1243,10 @@
1243 1243   - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1244 1244   - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1245 1245  
1246 ----
1304 +-----
1247 1247  
1248 -## **Findings**
1306 +## **Findings**##
1307 +
1249 1249  1. **Primary Observations:**
1250 1250   - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1251 1251   - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
... ... @@ -1258,9 +1258,10 @@
1258 1258   - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1259 1259   - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1260 1260  
1261 ----
1320 +-----
1262 1262  
1263 -## **Critique and Observations**
1322 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1323 +
1264 1264  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1265 1265   - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1266 1266   - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
... ... @@ -1273,47 +1273,49 @@
1273 1273   - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1274 1274   - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1275 1275  
1276 ----
1336 +-----
1277 1277  
1278 1278  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1279 1279  - Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1280 1280  - Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1281 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1341 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1282 1282  
1283 ----
1343 +-----
1284 1284  
1285 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1345 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1346 +
1286 1286  1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1287 1287  2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1288 1288  3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1289 1289  
1290 ----
1351 +-----
1291 1291  
1292 1292  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1293 -This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1354 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
1294 1294  
1295 1295  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1296 1296  
1297 ----
1358 +-----
1298 1298  
1299 1299  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1300 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1301 -
1361 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
1302 1302  {{/expand}}
1303 1303  
1304 1304  
1305 1305  == Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1306 -{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1366 +
1367 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1307 1307  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1308 1308  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
1309 1309  **Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1310 1310  **Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1311 1311  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1312 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1373 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1313 1313  
1314 ----
1375 +-----
1315 1315  
1316 -## **Key Statistics**
1377 +## **Key Statistics**##
1378 +
1317 1317  1. **General Observations:**
1318 1318   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1319 1319   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -1326,9 +1326,10 @@
1326 1326   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1327 1327   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1328 1328  
1329 ----
1391 +-----
1330 1330  
1331 -## **Findings**
1393 +## **Findings**##
1394 +
1332 1332  1. **Primary Observations:**
1333 1333   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1334 1334   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -1341,9 +1341,10 @@
1341 1341   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1342 1342   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1343 1343  
1344 ----
1407 +-----
1345 1345  
1346 -## **Critique and Observations**
1409 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1410 +
1347 1347  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1348 1348   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1349 1349   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1356,36 +1356,38 @@
1356 1356   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1357 1357   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1358 1358  
1359 ----
1423 +-----
1360 1360  
1361 1361  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1362 1362  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1363 1363  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1364 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1428 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1365 1365  
1366 ----
1430 +-----
1367 1367  
1368 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1432 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1433 +
1369 1369  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1370 1370  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1371 1371  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1372 1372  
1373 ----
1438 +-----
1374 1374  
1375 1375  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1376 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1441 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1377 1377  
1378 1378  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1379 1379  
1380 ----
1445 +-----
1381 1381  
1382 1382  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1383 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1384 -
1448 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1385 1385  {{/expand}}
1386 1386  
1387 1387  == Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults ==
1388 -{{expand title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" expanded="false"}} Source: Addictive Behaviors
1452 +
1453 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1454 + Source: Addictive Behaviors
1389 1389  Date of Publication: 2016
1390 1390  Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
1391 1391  Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
... ... @@ -1446,22 +1446,23 @@
1446 1446  
1447 1447  📄 Download Full Study
1448 1448  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
1449 -
1450 1450  {{/expand}}
1451 1451  
1452 1452  
1453 1453  == Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time? ==
1454 -{{expand title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?" expanded="false"}}
1519 +
1520 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1455 1455  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1456 1456  **Date of Publication:** *2014*
1457 1457  **Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1458 1458  **Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1459 1459  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1460 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
1526 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1461 1461  
1462 ----
1528 +-----
1463 1463  
1464 -## **Key Statistics**
1530 +## **Key Statistics**##
1531 +
1465 1465  1. **General Observations:**
1466 1466   - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1467 1467   - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
... ... @@ -1474,9 +1474,10 @@
1474 1474   - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1475 1475   - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1476 1476  
1477 ----
1544 +-----
1478 1478  
1479 -## **Findings**
1546 +## **Findings**##
1547 +
1480 1480  1. **Primary Observations:**
1481 1481   - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1482 1482   - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
... ... @@ -1489,9 +1489,10 @@
1489 1489   - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1490 1490   - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1491 1491  
1492 ----
1560 +-----
1493 1493  
1494 -## **Critique and Observations**
1562 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1563 +
1495 1495  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1496 1496   - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1497 1497   - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
... ... @@ -1504,32 +1504,32 @@
1504 1504   - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1505 1505   - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1506 1506  
1507 ----
1576 +-----
1508 1508  
1509 1509  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1510 1510  - Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1511 1511  - Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1512 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
1581 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1513 1513  
1514 ----
1583 +-----
1515 1515  
1516 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1585 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1586 +
1517 1517  1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1518 1518  2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1519 1519  3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1520 1520  
1521 ----
1591 +-----
1522 1522  
1523 1523  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1524 -This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.
1594 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.  ##
1525 1525  
1526 1526  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1527 1527  
1528 ----
1598 +-----
1529 1529  
1530 1530  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1531 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
1532 -
1601 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
1533 1533  {{/expand}}
1534 1534  
1535 1535  
... ... @@ -1539,17 +1539,19 @@
1539 1539  = Whiteness =
1540 1540  
1541 1541  == Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports ==
1542 -{{expand title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports" expanded="false"}}
1611 +
1612 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1543 1543  **Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1544 1544  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
1545 1545  **Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1546 1546  **Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1547 1547  **DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1548 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
1618 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1549 1549  
1550 ----
1620 +-----
1551 1551  
1552 -## **Key Statistics**
1622 +## **Key Statistics**##
1623 +
1553 1553  1. **General Observations:**
1554 1554   - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1555 1555   - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
... ... @@ -1562,9 +1562,10 @@
1562 1562   - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1563 1563   - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1564 1564  
1565 ----
1636 +-----
1566 1566  
1567 -## **Findings**
1638 +## **Findings**##
1639 +
1568 1568  1. **Primary Observations:**
1569 1569   - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1570 1570   - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
... ... @@ -1577,9 +1577,10 @@
1577 1577   - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1578 1578   - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1579 1579  
1580 ----
1652 +-----
1581 1581  
1582 -## **Critique and Observations**
1654 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1655 +
1583 1583  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1584 1584   - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1585 1585   - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
... ... @@ -1592,32 +1592,32 @@
1592 1592   - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1593 1593   - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1594 1594  
1595 ----
1668 +-----
1596 1596  
1597 1597  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1598 1598  - Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1599 1599  - Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1600 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
1673 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1601 1601  
1602 ----
1675 +-----
1603 1603  
1604 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1677 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1678 +
1605 1605  1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1606 1606  2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1607 1607  3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1608 1608  
1609 ----
1683 +-----
1610 1610  
1611 1611  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1612 -This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.
1686 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
1613 1613  
1614 1614  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1615 1615  
1616 ----
1690 +-----
1617 1617  
1618 1618  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1619 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
1620 -
1693 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
1621 1621  {{/expand}}
1622 1622  
1623 1623  
... ... @@ -1627,17 +1627,19 @@
1627 1627  = White Guilt =
1628 1628  
1629 1629  == Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations ==
1630 -{{expand title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations" expanded="false"}}
1703 +
1704 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1631 1631  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1632 1632  **Date of Publication:** *2016*
1633 1633  **Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1634 1634  **Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1635 1635  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1636 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1710 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1637 1637  
1638 ----
1712 +-----
1639 1639  
1640 -## **Key Statistics**
1714 +## **Key Statistics**##
1715 +
1641 1641  1. **General Observations:**
1642 1642   - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1643 1643   - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
... ... @@ -1650,9 +1650,10 @@
1650 1650   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1651 1651   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1652 1652  
1653 ----
1728 +-----
1654 1654  
1655 -## **Findings**
1730 +## **Findings**##
1731 +
1656 1656  1. **Primary Observations:**
1657 1657   - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1658 1658   - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
... ... @@ -1665,9 +1665,10 @@
1665 1665   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1666 1666   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1667 1667  
1668 ----
1744 +-----
1669 1669  
1670 -## **Critique and Observations**
1746 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1747 +
1671 1671  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1672 1672   - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1673 1673   - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
... ... @@ -1680,47 +1680,49 @@
1680 1680   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1681 1681   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1682 1682  
1683 ----
1760 +-----
1684 1684  
1685 1685  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1686 1686  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1687 1687  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1688 -- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1765 +- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1689 1689  
1690 ----
1767 +-----
1691 1691  
1692 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1769 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1770 +
1693 1693  1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1694 1694  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1695 1695  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1696 1696  
1697 ----
1775 +-----
1698 1698  
1699 1699  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1700 -This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.
1778 +This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
1701 1701  
1702 1702  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1703 1703  
1704 ----
1782 +-----
1705 1705  
1706 1706  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1707 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1708 -
1785 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
1709 1709  {{/expand}}
1710 1710  
1711 1711  
1712 1712  == Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans ==
1713 -{{expand title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans" expanded="false"}}
1790 +
1791 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1714 1714  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1715 1715  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
1716 1716  **Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1717 1717  **Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1718 1718  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1719 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1797 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1720 1720  
1721 ----
1799 +-----
1722 1722  
1723 -## **Key Statistics**
1801 +## **Key Statistics**##
1802 +
1724 1724  1. **General Observations:**
1725 1725   - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1726 1726   - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
... ... @@ -1733,9 +1733,10 @@
1733 1733   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1734 1734   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1735 1735  
1736 ----
1815 +-----
1737 1737  
1738 -## **Findings**
1817 +## **Findings**##
1818 +
1739 1739  1. **Primary Observations:**
1740 1740   - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1741 1741   - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
... ... @@ -1748,9 +1748,10 @@
1748 1748   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1749 1749   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1750 1750  
1751 ----
1831 +-----
1752 1752  
1753 -## **Critique and Observations**
1833 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1834 +
1754 1754  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1755 1755   - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1756 1756   - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
... ... @@ -1763,46 +1763,48 @@
1763 1763   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1764 1764   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1765 1765  
1766 ----
1847 +-----
1767 1767  
1768 1768  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1769 1769  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1770 1770  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1771 -- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1852 +- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1772 1772  
1773 ----
1854 +-----
1774 1774  
1775 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1856 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1857 +
1776 1776  1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1777 1777  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1778 1778  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1779 1779  
1780 ----
1862 +-----
1781 1781  
1782 1782  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1783 -This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.
1865 +This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
1784 1784  
1785 1785  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1786 1786  
1787 ----
1869 +-----
1788 1788  
1789 1789  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1790 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1791 -
1872 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
1792 1792  {{/expand}}
1793 1793  
1794 1794  == Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities? ==
1795 -{{expand title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?" expanded="false"}}
1876 +
1877 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1796 1796  **Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1797 1797  **Date of Publication:** *2023*
1798 1798  **Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1799 1799  **Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1800 1800  **DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1801 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1883 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1802 1802  
1803 ----
1885 +-----
1804 1804  
1805 -## **Key Statistics**
1887 +## **Key Statistics**##
1888 +
1806 1806  1. **General Observations:**
1807 1807   - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1808 1808   - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
... ... @@ -1815,9 +1815,10 @@
1815 1815   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1816 1816   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1817 1817  
1818 ----
1901 +-----
1819 1819  
1820 -## **Findings**
1903 +## **Findings**##
1904 +
1821 1821  1. **Primary Observations:**
1822 1822   - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1823 1823   - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
... ... @@ -1830,9 +1830,10 @@
1830 1830   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1831 1831   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1832 1832  
1833 ----
1917 +-----
1834 1834  
1835 -## **Critique and Observations**
1919 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1920 +
1836 1836  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1837 1837   - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1838 1838   - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
... ... @@ -1845,32 +1845,32 @@
1845 1845   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1846 1846   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1847 1847  
1848 ----
1933 +-----
1849 1849  
1850 1850  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1851 1851  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1852 1852  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1853 -- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1938 +- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
1854 1854  
1855 ----
1940 +-----
1856 1856  
1857 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1942 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1943 +
1858 1858  1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1859 1859  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1860 1860  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1861 1861  
1862 ----
1948 +-----
1863 1863  
1864 1864  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1865 -This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.
1951 +This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
1866 1866  
1867 1867  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1868 1868  
1869 ----
1955 +-----
1870 1870  
1871 1871  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1872 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1873 -
1958 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
1874 1874  {{/expand}}
1875 1875  
1876 1876  
... ... @@ -1878,17 +1878,19 @@
1878 1878  = Media =
1879 1879  
1880 1880  == Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic ==
1881 -{{expand title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict" expanded="false"}}
1966 +
1967 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"}}
1882 1882  **Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1883 1883  **Date of Publication:** *2021*
1884 1884  **Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1885 1885  **Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1886 1886  **DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1887 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*
1973 +**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1888 1888  
1889 ----
1975 +-----
1890 1890  
1891 -## **Key Statistics**
1977 +## **Key Statistics**##
1978 +
1892 1892  1. **General Observations:**
1893 1893   - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1894 1894   - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
... ... @@ -1901,9 +1901,10 @@
1901 1901   - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1902 1902   - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1903 1903  
1904 ----
1991 +-----
1905 1905  
1906 -## **Findings**
1993 +## **Findings**##
1994 +
1907 1907  1. **Primary Observations:**
1908 1908   - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1909 1909   - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
... ... @@ -1916,9 +1916,10 @@
1916 1916   - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1917 1917   - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1918 1918  
1919 ----
2007 +-----
1920 1920  
1921 -## **Critique and Observations**
2009 +## **Critique and Observations**##
2010 +
1922 1922  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1923 1923   - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1924 1924   - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
... ... @@ -1931,45 +1931,47 @@
1931 1931   - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1932 1932   - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1933 1933  
1934 ----
2023 +-----
1935 1935  
1936 1936  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1937 1937  - Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
1938 1938  - Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1939 -- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
2028 +- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
1940 1940  
1941 ----
2030 +-----
1942 1942  
1943 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2032 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2033 +
1944 1944  1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
1945 1945  2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1946 1946  3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1947 1947  
1948 ----
2038 +-----
1949 1949  
1950 1950  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1951 -This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.
2041 +This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
1952 1952  
1953 ----
2043 +-----
1954 1954  
1955 1955  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1956 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
1957 -
2046 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
1958 1958  {{/expand}}
1959 1959  
1960 1960  
1961 1961  == Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions ==
1962 -{{expand title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions" expanded="false"}}
2051 +
2052 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
1963 1963  **Source:** *Politics & Policy*
1964 1964  **Date of Publication:** *2007*
1965 1965  **Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
1966 1966  **Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
1967 1967  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
1968 -**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*
2058 +**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
1969 1969  
1970 ----
2060 +-----
1971 1971  
1972 -## **Key Statistics**
2062 +## **Key Statistics**##
2063 +
1973 1973  1. **General Observations:**
1974 1974   - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
1975 1975   - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
... ... @@ -1982,9 +1982,10 @@
1982 1982   - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
1983 1983   - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
1984 1984  
1985 ----
2076 +-----
1986 1986  
1987 -## **Findings**
2078 +## **Findings**##
2079 +
1988 1988  1. **Primary Observations:**
1989 1989   - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
1990 1990   - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
... ... @@ -1997,9 +1997,10 @@
1997 1997   - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
1998 1998   - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
1999 1999  
2000 ----
2092 +-----
2001 2001  
2002 -## **Critique and Observations**
2094 +## **Critique and Observations**##
2095 +
2003 2003  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2004 2004   - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
2005 2005   - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
... ... @@ -2012,44 +2012,46 @@
2012 2012   - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
2013 2013   - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
2014 2014  
2015 ----
2108 +-----
2016 2016  
2017 2017  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2018 2018  - Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
2019 2019  - Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
2020 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.
2113 +- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
2021 2021  
2022 ----
2115 +-----
2023 2023  
2024 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2117 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2118 +
2025 2025  1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
2026 2026  2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
2027 2027  3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
2028 2028  
2029 ----
2123 +-----
2030 2030  
2031 2031  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2032 -This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.
2126 +This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
2033 2033  
2034 ----
2128 +-----
2035 2035  
2036 2036  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2037 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]
2038 -
2131 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
2039 2039  {{/expand}}
2040 2040  
2041 2041  == Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion ==
2042 -{{expand title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion" expanded="false"}}
2135 +
2136 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
2043 2043  **Source:** *Journal of Communication*
2044 2044  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
2045 2045  **Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
2046 2046  **Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
2047 2047  **DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2048 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*
2142 +**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
2049 2049  
2050 ----
2144 +-----
2051 2051  
2052 -## **Key Statistics**
2146 +## **Key Statistics**##
2147 +
2053 2053  1. **General Observations:**
2054 2054   - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
2055 2055   - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
... ... @@ -2062,9 +2062,10 @@
2062 2062   - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
2063 2063   - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
2064 2064  
2065 ----
2160 +-----
2066 2066  
2067 -## **Findings**
2162 +## **Findings**##
2163 +
2068 2068  1. **Primary Observations:**
2069 2069   - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
2070 2070   - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
... ... @@ -2077,9 +2077,10 @@
2077 2077   - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
2078 2078   - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
2079 2079  
2080 ----
2176 +-----
2081 2081  
2082 -## **Critique and Observations**
2178 +## **Critique and Observations**##
2179 +
2083 2083  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2084 2084   - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
2085 2085   - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
... ... @@ -2092,31 +2092,31 @@
2092 2092   - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
2093 2093   - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
2094 2094  
2095 ----
2192 +-----
2096 2096  
2097 2097  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2098 2098  - Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
2099 2099  - Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
2100 -- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
2197 +- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
2101 2101  
2102 ----
2199 +-----
2103 2103  
2104 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2201 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2202 +
2105 2105  1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
2106 2106  2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
2107 2107  3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
2108 2108  
2109 ----
2207 +-----
2110 2110  
2111 2111  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2112 -This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.
2210 +This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
2113 2113  
2114 ----
2212 +-----
2115 2115  
2116 2116  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2117 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
2118 -
2215 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
2119 2119  {{/expand}}
2120 2120  
2121 2121  
2122 -
2219 +