0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 76.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 05:33
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 80.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 06:49
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -13,625 +13,548 @@
13 13  
14 14  
15 15  
16 +
16 16  == Research Studies Repository ==
17 17  
18 18  
19 -= Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding =
20 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
21 -**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
22 -**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
23 -**Author(s):** Smith et al.
24 -**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
25 -**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
26 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
20 += Genetics =
27 27  
28 -**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
29 29  
30 -=== **Key Statistics** ===
23 +== Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History ==
31 31  
32 -1. **General Observations:**
33 - - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
34 - - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
25 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
26 +**Source:** *Nature*
27 +**Date of Publication:** *2009*
28 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
29 +**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
30 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
31 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
35 35  
36 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
37 - - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
38 - - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
33 +-----
39 39  
40 -=== **Findings** ===
35 +## **Key Statistics**##
41 41  
42 -- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
43 -- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
44 -
45 -=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
46 -
47 -- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
48 -- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
49 -{{/expand}}
50 -
51 -{{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
52 -**Source:** [Journal/Institution Name]
53 -**Date of Publication:** [Publication Date]
54 -**Author(s):** [Author(s) Name(s)]
55 -**Title:** "[Study Title]"
56 -**DOI:** [DOI or Link]
57 -**Subject Matter:** [Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]
58 -
59 ----
60 -
61 -## **Key Statistics**
62 62  1. **General Observations:**
63 - - [Statistical finding or observation]
64 - - [Statistical finding or observation]
38 + - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
39 + - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
65 65  
66 66  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
67 - - [Breakdown of findings by gender, race, or other subgroups]
42 + - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
43 + - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
68 68  
69 69  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
70 - - [Any additional findings or significant statistics]
46 + - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
47 + - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
71 71  
72 ----
49 +-----
73 73  
74 -## **Findings**
51 +## **Findings**##
52 +
75 75  1. **Primary Observations:**
76 - - [High-level findings or trends in the study]
54 + - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
55 + - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
77 77  
78 78  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
79 - - [Disparities or differences highlighted in the study]
58 + - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
59 + - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
80 80  
81 81  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
82 - - [Detailed explanation of any notable specific findings]
62 + - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
63 + - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
83 83  
84 ----
65 +-----
85 85  
86 -## **Critique and Observations**
67 +## **Critique and Observations**##
68 +
87 87  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
88 - - [Examples: strong methodology, large dataset, etc.]
70 + - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
71 + - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
89 89  
90 90  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
91 - - [Examples: data gaps, lack of upstream analysis, etc.]
74 + - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
75 + - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
92 92  
93 93  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
94 - - [Ideas for further research or addressing limitations]
78 + - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
79 + - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
95 95  
96 ----
81 +-----
97 97  
98 98  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
99 -- [Explanation of how this study contributes to your subproject goals.]
100 -- [Any key arguments or findings that support or challenge your views.]
84 +- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
85 +- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
86 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
101 101  
102 ----
88 +-----
103 103  
104 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
105 -1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
106 -2. [Potential studies or sources to complement this analysis.]
90 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
107 107  
108 ----
92 +1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
93 +2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
94 +3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
109 109  
96 +-----
97 +
110 110  ## **Summary of Research Study**
111 -This study examines **[core research question or focus]**, providing insights into **[main subject area]**. The research utilized **[sample size and methodology]** to assess **[key variables or measured outcomes]**.
99 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
112 112  
113 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
101 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studys contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
114 114  
115 ----
103 +-----
116 116  
117 117  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
118 -{{velocity}}
119 -#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
120 -#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
121 -#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
122 -[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
123 -#else
124 -{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
125 -#end
126 -{{/velocity}}
127 -
106 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
128 128  {{/expand}}
129 129  
130 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
131 131  
110 +== Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations ==
132 132  
112 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
113 +**Source:** *Nature*
114 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
115 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
116 +**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
117 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
118 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
133 133  
134 ----
120 +-----
135 135  
136 -{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}}
137 -**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
138 -**Date of Publication:** *2020*
139 -**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
140 -**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
141 -**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
142 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*
122 +## **Key Statistics**##
143 143  
144 ----
145 -
146 -## **Key Statistics**
147 147  1. **General Observations:**
148 - - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
149 - - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
125 + - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
126 + - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
150 150  
151 151  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
152 - - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
153 - - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
129 + - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
130 + - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
154 154  
155 155  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
156 - - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
157 - - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
133 + - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
134 + - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
158 158  
159 ----
136 +-----
160 160  
161 -## **Findings**
138 +## **Findings**##
139 +
162 162  1. **Primary Observations:**
163 - - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
164 - - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
141 + - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
142 + - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
165 165  
166 166  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
167 - - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
168 - - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
145 + - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
146 + - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
169 169  
170 170  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
171 - - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
172 - - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
149 + - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
150 + - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
173 173  
174 ----
152 +-----
175 175  
176 -## **Critique and Observations**
154 +## **Critique and Observations**##
155 +
177 177  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
178 - - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
179 - - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
157 + - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
158 + - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
180 180  
181 181  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
182 - - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
183 - - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
161 + - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
162 + - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
184 184  
185 185  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
186 - - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
187 - - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
165 + - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
166 + - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
188 188  
189 ----
168 +-----
190 190  
191 191  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
192 -- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
193 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
171 +- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
172 +- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
173 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
194 194  
195 ----
175 +-----
196 196  
197 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
198 -1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
199 -2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
177 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
200 200  
201 ----
179 +1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
180 +2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
181 +3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
202 202  
183 +-----
184 +
203 203  ## **Summary of Research Study**
204 -This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.
186 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
205 205  
206 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
188 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studys contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
207 207  
208 ----
190 +-----
209 209  
210 210  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
211 -{{velocity}}
212 -#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
213 -#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
214 -#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
215 -[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
216 -#else
217 -{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
218 -#end
219 -{{/velocity}}
220 -
193 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
221 221  {{/expand}}
222 222  
223 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
224 224  
197 +== Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies ==
225 225  
226 -{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}}
227 -**Source:** *Current Psychology*
228 -**Date of Publication:** *2024*
229 -**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
230 -**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
231 -**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
232 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
199 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
200 +**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
201 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
202 +**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
203 +**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
204 +**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
205 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
233 233  
234 ----
207 +-----
235 235  
236 -## **Key Statistics**
209 +## **Key Statistics**##
210 +
237 237  1. **General Observations:**
238 - - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
239 - - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
212 + - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
213 + - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
240 240  
241 241  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
242 - - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
243 - - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
216 + - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
217 + - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
244 244  
245 245  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
246 - - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
247 - - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
220 + - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
221 + - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
248 248  
249 ----
223 +-----
250 250  
251 -## **Findings**
225 +## **Findings**##
226 +
252 252  1. **Primary Observations:**
253 - - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
254 - - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
228 + - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
229 + - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
255 255  
256 256  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
257 - - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
258 - - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
232 + - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (70-80%)**.
233 + - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
259 259  
260 260  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
261 - - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
262 - - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
236 + - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
237 + - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
263 263  
264 ----
239 +-----
265 265  
266 -## **Critique and Observations**
241 +## **Critique and Observations**##
242 +
267 267  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
268 - - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
269 - - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
244 + - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
245 + - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
270 270  
271 271  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
272 - - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
273 - - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
248 + - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
249 + - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
274 274  
275 275  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
276 - - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
277 - - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
252 + - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
253 + - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
278 278  
279 ----
255 +-----
280 280  
281 281  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
282 -- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
283 -- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
284 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
258 +- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
259 +- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
260 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
285 285  
286 ----
262 +-----
287 287  
288 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
289 -1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
290 -2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
291 -3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
264 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
292 292  
293 ----
266 +1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
267 +2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
268 +3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
294 294  
270 +-----
271 +
295 295  ## **Summary of Research Study**
296 -This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.
273 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
297 297  
298 298  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
299 299  
300 ----
277 +-----
301 301  
302 302  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
303 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
304 -
280 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
305 305  {{/expand}}
306 306  
307 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
308 308  
309 -{{expand title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" expanded="false"}} Source: Addictive Behaviors
310 -Date of Publication: 2016
311 -Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
312 -Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
313 -DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
314 -Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
284 +== Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease ==
315 315  
316 -Key Statistics
317 -General Observations:
286 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
287 +**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
288 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
289 +**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
290 +**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
291 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
292 +**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
318 318  
319 -Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
320 -Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
321 -Subgroup Analysis:
294 +-----
322 322  
323 -Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
324 -Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
325 -Other Significant Data Points:
296 +## **Key Statistics**##
326 326  
327 -Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
328 -Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
329 -Findings
330 -Primary Observations:
331 -
332 -Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
333 -Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
334 -Subgroup Trends:
335 -
336 -Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
337 -College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
338 -Specific Case Analysis:
339 -
340 -Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
341 -Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
342 -Critique and Observations
343 -Strengths of the Study:
344 -
345 -Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
346 -Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
347 -Limitations of the Study:
348 -
349 -Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
350 -Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
351 -Suggestions for Improvement:
352 -
353 -Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
354 -Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
355 -Relevance to Subproject
356 -Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
357 -Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
358 -Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
359 -Suggestions for Further Exploration
360 -Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
361 -Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
362 -Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
363 -Summary of Research Study
364 -This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
365 -
366 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
367 -
368 -📄 Download Full Study
369 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
370 -
371 -{{/expand}}
372 -
373 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
374 -
375 -{{expand title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?" expanded="false"}}
376 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
377 -**Date of Publication:** *2014*
378 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
379 -**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
380 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
381 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
382 -
383 ----
384 -
385 -## **Key Statistics**
386 386  1. **General Observations:**
387 - - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
388 - - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
299 + - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
300 + - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
389 389  
390 390  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
391 - - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
392 - - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
303 + - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
304 + - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
393 393  
394 394  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
395 - - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
396 - - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
307 + - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
308 + - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
397 397  
398 ----
310 +-----
399 399  
400 -## **Findings**
312 +## **Findings**##
313 +
401 401  1. **Primary Observations:**
402 - - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
403 - - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
315 + - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
316 + - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
404 404  
405 405  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
406 - - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
407 - - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
319 + - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
320 + - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
408 408  
409 409  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
410 - - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
411 - - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
323 + - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
324 + - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
412 412  
413 ----
326 +-----
414 414  
415 -## **Critique and Observations**
328 +## **Critique and Observations**##
329 +
416 416  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
417 - - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
418 - - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
331 + - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
332 + - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
419 419  
420 420  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
421 - - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
422 - - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
335 + - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
336 + - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
423 423  
424 424  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
425 - - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
426 - - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
339 + - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
340 + - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
427 427  
428 ----
342 +-----
429 429  
430 430  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
431 -- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
432 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
433 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
345 +- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
346 +- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
347 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
434 434  
435 ----
349 +-----
436 436  
437 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
438 -1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
439 -2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
440 -3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
351 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
441 441  
442 ----
353 +1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
354 +2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
355 +3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
443 443  
357 +-----
358 +
444 444  ## **Summary of Research Study**
445 -This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.
360 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
446 446  
447 447  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
448 448  
449 ----
364 +-----
450 450  
451 451  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
452 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
453 -
367 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
454 454  {{/expand}}
455 455  
456 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
457 457  
458 -{{expand title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation" expanded="false"}}
459 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
460 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
461 -**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
462 -**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
463 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
464 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
371 +== Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA ==
465 465  
466 ----
373 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
374 +**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
375 +**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
376 +**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
377 +**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
378 +**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
379 +**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
467 467  
468 -## **Key Statistics**
381 +-----
382 +
383 +## **Key Statistics**##
384 +
469 469  1. **General Observations:**
470 - - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
471 - - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
386 + - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
387 + - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
472 472  
473 473  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
474 - - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
475 - - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
390 + - Examines **West Eurasian populations** and their genetic evolution.
391 + - Tracks **changes in allele frequencies over millennia**.
476 476  
477 477  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
478 - - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
479 - - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
394 + - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
395 + - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
480 480  
481 ----
397 +-----
482 482  
483 -## **Findings**
399 +## **Findings**##
400 +
484 484  1. **Primary Observations:**
485 - - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
486 - - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
402 + - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
403 + - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
487 487  
488 488  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
489 - - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
490 - - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
406 + - Selection pressure on **energy storage genes** supports the **Thrifty Gene Hypothesis**.
407 + - **Cognitive performance-related alleles** have undergone selection, but their historical advantages remain unclear.
491 491  
492 492  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
493 - - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
494 - - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
410 + - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
411 + - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
412 + - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
495 495  
496 ----
414 +-----
497 497  
498 -## **Critique and Observations**
416 +## **Critique and Observations**##
417 +
499 499  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
500 - - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
501 - - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
419 + - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
420 + - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
502 502  
503 503  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
504 - - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
505 - - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
423 + - Findings **may not translate directly** to modern populations.
424 + - **Unclear whether observed selection pressures persist today**.
506 506  
507 507  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
508 - - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
509 - - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
427 + - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
428 + - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
510 510  
511 ----
430 +-----
512 512  
513 513  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
514 -- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
515 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
516 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
433 +- Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
434 +- Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
435 +- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
517 517  
518 ----
437 +-----
519 519  
520 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
521 -1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
522 -2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
523 -3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
439 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
524 524  
525 ----
441 +1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
442 +2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
443 +3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
526 526  
445 +-----
446 +
527 527  ## **Summary of Research Study**
528 -This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.
448 +This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
529 529  
530 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
450 +-----
531 531  
532 ----
533 -
534 534  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
535 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
536 -
453 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
537 537  {{/expand}}
538 538  
539 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
540 540  
541 -{{expand title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media" expanded="false"}}
542 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
543 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
544 -**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
545 -**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
546 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
547 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
457 +== Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age ==
548 548  
549 ----
459 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
460 +**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
461 +**Date of Publication:** *2013*
462 +**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
463 +**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
464 +**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
465 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
550 550  
551 -## **Key Statistics**
467 +-----
468 +
469 +## **Key Statistics**##
470 +
552 552  1. **General Observations:**
553 - - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
554 - - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
472 + - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
473 + - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
555 555  
556 556  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
557 - - **90% of experts were from Western countries**, and **83% were male**.
558 - - Political spectrum ranged from **54% left-liberal, 24% conservative**, with significant ideological influences on views.
476 + - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
477 + - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
559 559  
560 560  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
561 - - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
562 - - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
480 + - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
481 + - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
563 563  
564 ----
483 +-----
565 565  
566 -## **Findings**
485 +## **Findings**##
486 +
567 567  1. **Primary Observations:**
568 - - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
569 - - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
488 + - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
489 + - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
570 570  
571 571  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
572 - - **Left-leaning experts were more likely to reject genetic explanations for group IQ differences**.
573 - - **Right-leaning experts tended to favor a stronger role for genetic factors** in intelligence disparities.
492 + - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
493 + - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
574 574  
575 575  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
576 - - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
577 - - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
496 + - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
497 + - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
578 578  
579 ----
499 +-----
580 580  
581 -## **Critique and Observations**
501 +## **Critique and Observations**##
502 +
582 582  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
583 - - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
584 - - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
504 + - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
505 + - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
585 585  
586 586  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
587 - - **Sample primarily from Western countries**, limiting global perspectives.
588 - - Self-selection bias may skew responses toward **those more willing to engage with controversial topics**.
508 + - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
509 + - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
589 589  
590 590  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
591 - - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
592 - - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
512 + - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
513 + - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
593 593  
594 ----
515 +-----
595 595  
596 596  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
597 -- Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
598 -- Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
599 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
518 +- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
519 +- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
520 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
600 600  
601 ----
522 +-----
602 602  
603 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
604 -1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
605 -2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
606 -3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
524 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
607 607  
608 ----
526 +1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
527 +2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
528 +3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
609 609  
530 +-----
531 +
610 610  ## **Summary of Research Study**
611 -This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.
533 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
612 612  
613 613  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
614 614  
615 ----
537 +-----
616 616  
617 617  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
618 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
619 -
540 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
620 620  {{/expand}}
621 621  
622 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
623 623  
624 -{{expand title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications" expanded="false"}}
544 +== Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications ==
545 +
546 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
625 625  **Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
626 626  **Date of Publication:** *2010*
627 627  **Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
628 628  **Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
629 629  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
630 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
552 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
631 631  
632 ----
554 +-----
633 633  
634 -## **Key Statistics**
556 +## **Key Statistics**##
557 +
635 635  1. **General Observations:**
636 636   - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
637 637   - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
... ... @@ -644,9 +644,10 @@
644 644   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
645 645   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
646 646  
647 ----
570 +-----
648 648  
649 -## **Findings**
572 +## **Findings**##
573 +
650 650  1. **Primary Observations:**
651 651   - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
652 652   - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
... ... @@ -659,9 +659,10 @@
659 659   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
660 660   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
661 661  
662 ----
586 +-----
663 663  
664 -## **Critique and Observations**
588 +## **Critique and Observations**##
589 +
665 665  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
666 666   - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
667 667   - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
... ... @@ -674,798 +674,705 @@
674 674   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
675 675   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
676 676  
677 ----
602 +-----
678 678  
679 679  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
680 680  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
681 681  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
682 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
607 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
683 683  
684 ----
609 +-----
685 685  
686 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
611 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
612 +
687 687  1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
688 688  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
689 689  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
690 690  
691 ----
617 +-----
692 692  
693 693  ## **Summary of Research Study**
694 -This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.
620 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
695 695  
696 696  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
697 697  
698 ----
624 +-----
699 699  
700 700  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
701 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
702 -
627 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
703 703  {{/expand}}
704 704  
705 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
706 706  
707 -{{expand title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age" expanded="false"}}
708 -**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
709 -**Date of Publication:** *2013*
710 -**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
711 -**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
712 -**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
713 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
631 +== Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media ==
714 714  
715 ----
716 -
717 -## **Key Statistics**
718 -1. **General Observations:**
719 - - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
720 - - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
721 -
722 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
723 - - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
724 - - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
725 -
726 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
727 - - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
728 - - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
729 -
730 ----
731 -
732 -## **Findings**
733 -1. **Primary Observations:**
734 - - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
735 - - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
736 -
737 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
738 - - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
739 - - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
740 -
741 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
742 - - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
743 - - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
744 -
745 ----
746 -
747 -## **Critique and Observations**
748 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
749 - - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
750 - - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
751 -
752 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
753 - - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
754 - - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
755 -
756 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
757 - - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
758 - - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
759 -
760 ----
761 -
762 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
763 -- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
764 -- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
765 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
766 -
767 ----
768 -
769 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
770 -1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
771 -2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
772 -3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
773 -
774 ----
775 -
776 -## **Summary of Research Study**
777 -This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.
778 -
779 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
780 -
781 ----
782 -
783 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
784 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
785 -
786 -{{/expand}}
787 -
788 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
789 -
790 -{{expand title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports" expanded="false"}}
791 -**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
633 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
634 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
792 792  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
793 -**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
794 -**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
795 -**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
796 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
636 +**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
637 +**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
638 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
639 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
797 797  
798 ----
641 +-----
799 799  
800 -## **Key Statistics**
643 +## **Key Statistics**##
644 +
801 801  1. **General Observations:**
802 - - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
803 - - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
646 + - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
647 + - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
804 804  
805 805  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
806 - - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
807 - - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
650 + - **90% of experts were from Western countries**, and **83% were male**.
651 + - Political spectrum ranged from **54% left-liberal, 24% conservative**, with significant ideological influences on views.
808 808  
809 809  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
810 - - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
811 - - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
654 + - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
655 + - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
812 812  
813 ----
657 +-----
814 814  
815 -## **Findings**
659 +## **Findings**##
660 +
816 816  1. **Primary Observations:**
817 - - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
818 - - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
662 + - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
663 + - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
819 819  
820 820  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
821 - - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
822 - - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
666 + - **Left-leaning experts were more likely to reject genetic explanations for group IQ differences**.
667 + - **Right-leaning experts tended to favor a stronger role for genetic factors** in intelligence disparities.
823 823  
824 824  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
825 - - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
826 - - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
670 + - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
671 + - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
827 827  
828 ----
673 +-----
829 829  
830 -## **Critique and Observations**
675 +## **Critique and Observations**##
676 +
831 831  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
832 - - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
833 - - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
678 + - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
679 + - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
834 834  
835 835  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
836 - - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
837 - - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
682 + - **Sample primarily from Western countries**, limiting global perspectives.
683 + - Self-selection bias may skew responses toward **those more willing to engage with controversial topics**.
838 838  
839 839  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
840 - - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
841 - - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
686 + - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
687 + - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
842 842  
843 ----
689 +-----
844 844  
845 845  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
846 -- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
847 -- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
848 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
692 +- Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
693 +- Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
694 +- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
849 849  
850 ----
696 +-----
851 851  
852 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
853 -1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
854 -2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
855 -3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
698 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
856 856  
857 ----
700 +1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
701 +2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
702 +3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
858 858  
704 +-----
705 +
859 859  ## **Summary of Research Study**
860 -This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.
707 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
861 861  
862 862  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
863 863  
864 ----
711 +-----
865 865  
866 866  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
867 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
868 -
714 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
869 869  {{/expand}}
870 870  
871 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
872 872  
873 -{{expand title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History" expanded="false"}}
874 -**Source:** *Nature*
875 -**Date of Publication:** *2009*
876 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
877 -**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
878 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
879 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*
718 +== Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation ==
880 880  
881 ----
720 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
721 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
722 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
723 +**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
724 +**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
725 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
726 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
882 882  
883 -## **Key Statistics**
728 +-----
729 +
730 +## **Key Statistics**##
731 +
884 884  1. **General Observations:**
885 - - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
886 - - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
733 + - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
734 + - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
887 887  
888 888  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
889 - - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
890 - - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
737 + - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
738 + - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
891 891  
892 892  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
893 - - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
894 - - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
741 + - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
742 + - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
895 895  
896 ----
744 +-----
897 897  
898 -## **Findings**
746 +## **Findings**##
747 +
899 899  1. **Primary Observations:**
900 - - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
901 - - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
749 + - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
750 + - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
902 902  
903 903  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
904 - - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
905 - - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
753 + - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
754 + - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
906 906  
907 907  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
908 - - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
909 - - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
757 + - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
758 + - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
910 910  
911 ----
760 +-----
912 912  
913 -## **Critique and Observations**
762 +## **Critique and Observations**##
763 +
914 914  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
915 - - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
916 - - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
765 + - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
766 + - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
917 917  
918 918  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
919 - - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
920 - - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
769 + - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
770 + - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
921 921  
922 922  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
923 - - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
924 - - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
773 + - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
774 + - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
925 925  
926 ----
776 +-----
927 927  
928 928  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
929 -- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
930 -- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
931 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
779 +- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
780 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
781 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
932 932  
933 ----
783 +-----
934 934  
935 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
936 -1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
937 -2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
938 -3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
785 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
939 939  
940 ----
787 +1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
788 +2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
789 +3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
941 941  
791 +-----
792 +
942 942  ## **Summary of Research Study**
943 -This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.
794 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.  ##
944 944  
945 945  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
946 946  
947 ----
798 +-----
948 948  
949 949  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
950 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
951 -
801 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
952 952  {{/expand}}
953 953  
954 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
955 955  
805 +== Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding ==
956 956  
957 -{{expand title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations" expanded="false"}}
958 -**Source:** *Nature*
959 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
960 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
961 -**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
962 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
963 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
807 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
808 +**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
809 +**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
810 +**Author(s):** Smith et al.
811 +**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
812 +**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
813 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Scienc
964 964  
965 ----
815 +**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
966 966  
967 -## **Key Statistics**
817 +=== **Key Statistics** ===
818 +
968 968  1. **General Observations:**
969 - - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
970 - - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
820 + - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
821 + - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
971 971  
972 972  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
973 - - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
974 - - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
824 + - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
825 + - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
975 975  
976 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
977 - - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
978 - - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
827 +=== **Findings** ===
979 979  
980 ----
829 +- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
830 +- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
981 981  
982 -## **Findings**
983 -1. **Primary Observations:**
984 - - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
985 - - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
832 +=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
986 986  
987 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
988 - - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
989 - - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
834 +- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
835 +- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
836 +{{/expand}}
990 990  
991 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
992 - - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
993 - - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
994 994  
995 ----
839 +-----
996 996  
997 -## **Critique and Observations**
998 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
999 - - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
1000 - - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
841 += Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
1001 1001  
1002 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1003 - - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
1004 - - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
1005 1005  
1006 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1007 - - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
1008 - - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
844 +== Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018 ==
1009 1009  
1010 ----
846 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
847 +**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
848 +**Date of Publication:** *2020*
849 +**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
850 +**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
851 +**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
852 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
1011 1011  
1012 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1013 -- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
1014 -- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
1015 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
854 +-----
1016 1016  
1017 ----
856 +## **Key Statistics**##
1018 1018  
1019 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1020 -1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
1021 -2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
1022 -3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
1023 -
1024 ----
1025 -
1026 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1027 -This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.
1028 -
1029 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1030 -
1031 ----
1032 -
1033 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1034 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
1035 -
1036 -{{/expand}}
1037 -
1038 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1039 -
1040 -{{expand title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies" expanded="false"}}
1041 -**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
1042 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1043 -**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
1044 -**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
1045 -**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
1046 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
1047 -
1048 ----
1049 -
1050 -## **Key Statistics**
1051 1051  1. **General Observations:**
1052 - - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
1053 - - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
859 + - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
860 + - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
1054 1054  
1055 1055  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1056 - - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
1057 - - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
863 + - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
864 + - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
1058 1058  
1059 1059  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1060 - - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
1061 - - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
867 + - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
868 + - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
1062 1062  
1063 ----
870 +-----
1064 1064  
1065 -## **Findings**
872 +## **Findings**##
873 +
1066 1066  1. **Primary Observations:**
1067 - - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
1068 - - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
875 + - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
876 + - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
1069 1069  
1070 1070  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1071 - - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (~70-80%)**.
1072 - - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
879 + - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
880 + - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
1073 1073  
1074 1074  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1075 - - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
1076 - - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
883 + - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
884 + - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
1077 1077  
1078 ----
886 +-----
1079 1079  
1080 -## **Critique and Observations**
888 +## **Critique and Observations**##
889 +
1081 1081  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1082 - - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
1083 - - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
891 + - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
892 + - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
1084 1084  
1085 1085  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1086 - - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
1087 - - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
895 + - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
896 + - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
1088 1088  
1089 1089  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1090 - - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
1091 - - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
899 + - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
900 + - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
1092 1092  
1093 ----
902 +-----
1094 1094  
1095 1095  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1096 -- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
1097 -- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
1098 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
905 +- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
906 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
1099 1099  
1100 ----
908 +-----
1101 1101  
1102 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1103 -1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
1104 -2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
1105 -3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
910 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1106 1106  
1107 ----
912 +1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
913 +2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
1108 1108  
915 +-----
916 +
1109 1109  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1110 -This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.
918 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.  ##
1111 1111  
1112 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studys contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
920 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1113 1113  
1114 ----
922 +-----
1115 1115  
1116 1116  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1117 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
1118 -
925 +{{velocity}}
926 +#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
927 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
928 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
929 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
930 +#else
931 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
932 +#end {{/velocity}}##
1119 1119  {{/expand}}
1120 1120  
1121 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1122 1122  
1123 -{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}}
1124 -**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
1125 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1126 -**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
1127 -**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
1128 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
1129 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*
936 +== Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ==
1130 1130  
1131 ----
938 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
939 +**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
940 +**Date of Publication:** *2012*
941 +**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
942 +**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
943 +**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
944 +**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
1132 1132  
1133 -## **Key Statistics**
946 +-----
947 +
948 +## **Key Statistics**##
949 +
1134 1134  1. **General Observations:**
1135 - - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
1136 - - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
951 + - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
952 + - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
1137 1137  
1138 1138  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1139 - - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
1140 - - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
955 + - **Maternal race had a stronger influence than paternal race** on birth outcomes.
956 + - **Black mother–White father (BMWF) couples** had a higher risk than **White mother–Black father (WMBF) couples**.
1141 1141  
1142 1142  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1143 - - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
1144 - - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
959 + - **Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for key outcomes:**
960 + - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
961 + - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
962 + - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
1145 1145  
1146 ----
964 +-----
1147 1147  
1148 -## **Findings**
966 +## **Findings**##
967 +
1149 1149  1. **Primary Observations:**
1150 - - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
1151 - - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
969 + - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
970 + - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
1152 1152  
1153 1153  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1154 - - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
1155 - - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
973 + - **Black mothers (regardless of paternal race) had the highest risk of LBW and PTB**.
974 + - **White mothers with Black fathers had a lower risk** than Black mothers with White fathers.
1156 1156  
1157 1157  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1158 - - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
1159 - - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
977 + - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
978 + - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
1160 1160  
1161 ----
980 +-----
1162 1162  
1163 -## **Critique and Observations**
982 +## **Critique and Observations**##
983 +
1164 1164  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1165 - - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
1166 - - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
985 + - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
986 + - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
1167 1167  
1168 1168  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1169 - - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
1170 - - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
989 + - Data limited to **Black-White biracial couples**, excluding other racial groups.
990 + - **Socioeconomic and healthcare access factors** not fully explored.
1171 1171  
1172 1172  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1173 - - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
1174 - - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
993 + - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
994 + - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
1175 1175  
1176 ----
996 +-----
1177 1177  
1178 1178  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1179 -- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
1180 -- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
1181 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
999 +- Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
1000 +- Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
1001 +- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
1182 1182  
1183 ----
1003 +-----
1184 1184  
1185 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1186 -1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
1187 -2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
1188 -3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
1005 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1189 1189  
1190 ----
1007 +1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
1008 +2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
1009 +3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
1191 1191  
1011 +-----
1012 +
1192 1192  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1193 -This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.
1014 +This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
1194 1194  
1195 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1016 +-----
1196 1196  
1197 ----
1198 -
1199 1199  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1200 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
1201 -
1019 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
1202 1202  {{/expand}}
1203 1203  
1204 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1205 1205  
1023 +== Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness ==
1206 1206  
1025 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
1026 +**Source:** *Current Psychology*
1027 +**Date of Publication:** *2024*
1028 +**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
1029 +**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
1030 +**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
1031 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
1207 1207  
1208 -{{expand title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations" expanded="false"}}
1209 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1210 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1211 -**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1212 -**Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1213 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1214 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1033 +-----
1215 1215  
1216 ----
1035 +## **Key Statistics**##
1217 1217  
1218 -## **Key Statistics**
1219 1219  1. **General Observations:**
1220 - - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1221 - - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
1038 + - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
1039 + - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
1222 1222  
1223 1223  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1224 - - **50% of medical students surveyed endorsed at least one false belief about biological differences**.
1225 - - Participants who held these false beliefs were **more likely to underestimate Black patients pain levels**.
1042 + - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
1043 + - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
1226 1226  
1227 1227  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1228 - - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1229 - - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1046 + - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
1047 + - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
1230 1230  
1231 ----
1049 +-----
1232 1232  
1233 -## **Findings**
1051 +## **Findings**##
1052 +
1234 1234  1. **Primary Observations:**
1235 - - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1236 - - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
1054 + - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
1055 + - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
1237 1237  
1238 1238  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1239 - - Physicians who **did not endorse these beliefs** showed **no racial bias** in treatment recommendations.
1240 - - Bias was **strongest among first-year medical students** and decreased slightly in later years of training.
1058 + - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
1059 + - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
1241 1241  
1242 1242  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1243 - - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1244 - - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1062 + - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
1063 + - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
1245 1245  
1246 ----
1065 +-----
1247 1247  
1248 -## **Critique and Observations**
1067 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1068 +
1249 1249  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1250 - - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1251 - - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
1070 + - **First quantitative study** on incels social isolation and mental health.
1071 + - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
1252 1252  
1253 1253  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1254 - - The study focuses on **Black vs. white disparities**, leaving other racial/ethnic groups unexplored.
1255 - - Participants' responses were based on **hypothetical medical cases, not real-world treatment decisions**.
1074 + - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
1075 + - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
1256 1256  
1257 1257  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1258 - - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1259 - - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1078 + - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
1079 + - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
1260 1260  
1261 ----
1081 +-----
1262 1262  
1263 1263  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1264 -- Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1265 -- Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1266 -- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1084 +- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
1085 +- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
1086 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
1267 1267  
1268 ----
1088 +-----
1269 1269  
1270 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1271 -1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1272 -2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1273 -3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1090 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1274 1274  
1275 ----
1092 +1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
1093 +2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
1094 +3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
1276 1276  
1096 +-----
1097 +
1277 1277  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1278 -This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.
1099 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
1279 1279  
1280 1280  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1281 1281  
1282 ----
1103 +-----
1283 1283  
1284 1284  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1285 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1286 -
1106 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
1287 1287  {{/expand}}
1288 1288  
1289 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1290 1290  
1110 += Crime and Substance Abuse =
1291 1291  
1292 -{{expand title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans" expanded="false"}}
1293 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1294 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1295 -**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1296 -**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1297 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1298 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1299 1299  
1300 ----
1113 +== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1301 1301  
1302 -## **Key Statistics**
1115 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1116 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1117 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1118 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1119 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1120 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1121 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1122 +
1123 +-----
1124 +
1125 +## **Key Statistics**##
1126 +
1303 1303  1. **General Observations:**
1304 - - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1305 - - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
1128 + - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1129 + - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1306 1306  
1307 1307  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1308 - - The increase was **most pronounced among those with a high school education or less**.
1309 - - Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic mortality continued to decline over the same period.
1132 + - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1133 + - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1310 1310  
1311 1311  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1312 - - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1313 - - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1136 + - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1137 + - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1314 1314  
1315 ----
1139 +-----
1316 1316  
1317 -## **Findings**
1141 +## **Findings**##
1142 +
1318 1318  1. **Primary Observations:**
1319 - - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1320 - - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
1144 + - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1145 + - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1321 1321  
1322 1322  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1323 - - The **largest mortality increases** occurred among **whites without a college degree**.
1324 - - Chronic pain, functional limitations, and self-reported mental distress **rose significantly in affected groups**.
1148 + - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1149 + - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1325 1325  
1326 1326  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1327 - - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1328 - - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1152 + - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1153 + - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1329 1329  
1330 ----
1155 +-----
1331 1331  
1332 -## **Critique and Observations**
1157 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1158 +
1333 1333  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1334 - - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1335 - - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
1160 + - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1161 + - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1336 1336  
1337 1337  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1338 - - Does not establish **causality** between economic decline and increased mortality.
1339 - - Lacks **granular data on opioid prescribing patterns and regional differences**.
1164 + - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1165 + - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1340 1340  
1341 1341  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1342 - - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1343 - - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1168 + - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1169 + - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1344 1344  
1345 ----
1171 +-----
1346 1346  
1347 1347  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1348 -- Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1349 -- Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1350 -- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1174 +- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1175 +- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1176 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1351 1351  
1352 ----
1178 +-----
1353 1353  
1354 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1355 -1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1356 -2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1357 -3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1180 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1358 1358  
1359 ----
1182 +1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1183 +2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1184 +3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1360 1360  
1186 +-----
1187 +
1361 1361  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1362 -This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.
1189 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1363 1363  
1364 1364  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1365 1365  
1366 ----
1193 +-----
1367 1367  
1368 1368  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1369 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1370 -
1196 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1371 1371  {{/expand}}
1372 1372  
1373 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1374 1374  
1375 -{{expand title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?" expanded="false"}}
1376 -**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1377 -**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1378 -**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1379 -**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1380 -**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1381 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1200 +== Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1382 1382  
1383 ----
1202 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1203 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1204 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1205 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1206 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1207 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1208 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1384 1384  
1385 -## **Key Statistics**
1210 +-----
1211 +
1212 +## **Key Statistics**##
1213 +
1386 1386  1. **General Observations:**
1387 - - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1388 - - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
1215 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1216 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1389 1389  
1390 1390  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1391 - - Explores differences in **integration, social interactions, and perceptions of diversity**.
1392 - - Studies how **class, education, and neighborhood composition** affect adaptation to urban diversity.
1219 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1220 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1393 1393  
1394 1394  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1395 - - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1396 - - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1223 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1224 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1397 1397  
1398 ----
1226 +-----
1399 1399  
1400 -## **Findings**
1228 +## **Findings**##
1229 +
1401 1401  1. **Primary Observations:**
1402 - - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1403 - - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
1231 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1232 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1404 1404  
1405 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1406 - - Young, educated individuals in urban areas **are more open to cultural diversity**.
1407 - - Older and less mobile residents **report feelings of displacement and social isolation**.
1234 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1235 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1236 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1408 1408  
1409 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1410 - - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1411 - - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1238 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1239 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1240 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1412 1412  
1413 ----
1242 +-----
1414 1414  
1415 -## **Critique and Observations**
1416 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1417 - - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1418 - - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
1244 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1419 1419  
1420 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1421 - - Limited to **Western European urban settings**, missing perspectives from other global regions.
1422 - - Does not fully explore **policy interventions for fostering social cohesion**.
1246 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1247 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1248 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1423 1423  
1424 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1425 - - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1426 - - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1250 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1251 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1252 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1427 1427  
1428 ----
1254 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1255 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1256 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1429 1429  
1258 +-----
1259 +
1430 1430  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1431 -- Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1432 -- Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1433 -- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1261 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1262 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1263 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1434 1434  
1435 ----
1265 +-----
1436 1436  
1437 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1438 -1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1439 -2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1440 -3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1267 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1441 1441  
1442 ----
1269 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1270 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1271 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1443 1443  
1273 +-----
1274 +
1444 1444  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1445 -This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.
1276 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
1446 1446  
1447 1447  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1448 1448  
1449 ----
1280 +-----
1450 1450  
1451 1451  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1452 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1453 -
1283 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
1454 1454  {{/expand}}
1455 1455  
1456 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1457 1457  
1458 -{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1287 +== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1288 +
1289 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1459 1459  **Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1460 1460  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
1461 1461  **Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1462 1462  **Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1463 1463  **DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1464 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1295 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1465 1465  
1466 ----
1297 +-----
1467 1467  
1468 -## **Key Statistics**
1299 +## **Key Statistics**##
1300 +
1469 1469  1. **General Observations:**
1470 1470   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1471 1471   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -1478,9 +1478,10 @@
1478 1478   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1479 1479   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1480 1480  
1481 ----
1313 +-----
1482 1482  
1483 -## **Findings**
1315 +## **Findings**##
1316 +
1484 1484  1. **Primary Observations:**
1485 1485   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1486 1486   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -1493,9 +1493,10 @@
1493 1493   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1494 1494   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1495 1495  
1496 ----
1329 +-----
1497 1497  
1498 -## **Critique and Observations**
1331 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1332 +
1499 1499  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1500 1500   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1501 1501   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1508,625 +1508,641 @@
1508 1508   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1509 1509   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1510 1510  
1511 ----
1345 +-----
1512 1512  
1513 1513  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1514 1514  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1515 1515  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1516 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1350 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1517 1517  
1518 ----
1352 +-----
1519 1519  
1520 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1354 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1355 +
1521 1521  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1522 1522  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1523 1523  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1524 1524  
1525 ----
1360 +-----
1526 1526  
1527 1527  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1528 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1363 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1529 1529  
1530 1530  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1531 1531  
1532 ----
1367 +-----
1533 1533  
1534 1534  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1535 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1536 -
1370 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1537 1537  {{/expand}}
1538 1538  
1539 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1540 1540  
1374 +== Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults ==
1541 1541  
1542 -{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1543 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1544 -**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1545 -**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1546 -**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1547 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1548 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1376 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1377 + Source: Addictive Behaviors
1378 +Date of Publication: 2016
1379 +Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
1380 +Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
1381 +DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
1382 +Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
1549 1549  
1550 ----
1384 +Key Statistics
1385 +General Observations:
1551 1551  
1552 -## **Key Statistics**
1553 -1. **General Observations:**
1554 - - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1555 - - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1387 +Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
1388 +Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
1389 +Subgroup Analysis:
1556 1556  
1557 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1558 - - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1559 - - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1391 +Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
1392 +Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
1393 +Other Significant Data Points:
1560 1560  
1561 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1562 - - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1563 - - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1395 +Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
1396 +Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
1397 +Findings
1398 +Primary Observations:
1564 1564  
1565 ----
1400 +Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
1401 +Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
1402 +Subgroup Trends:
1566 1566  
1567 -## **Findings**
1568 -1. **Primary Observations:**
1569 - - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1570 - - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1404 +Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
1405 +College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
1406 +Specific Case Analysis:
1571 1571  
1572 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1573 - - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1574 - - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1408 +Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
1409 +Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
1410 +Critique and Observations
1411 +Strengths of the Study:
1575 1575  
1576 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1577 - - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1578 - - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1413 +Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
1414 +Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
1415 +Limitations of the Study:
1579 1579  
1580 ----
1417 +Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
1418 +Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
1419 +Suggestions for Improvement:
1581 1581  
1582 -## **Critique and Observations**
1583 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1584 - - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1585 - - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1421 +Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
1422 +Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
1423 +Relevance to Subproject
1424 +Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
1425 +Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
1426 +Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
1427 +Suggestions for Further Exploration
1428 +Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
1429 +Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
1430 +Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
1431 +Summary of Research Study
1432 +This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
1586 1586  
1587 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1588 - - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1589 - - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1590 -
1591 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1592 - - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1593 - - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1594 -
1595 ----
1596 -
1597 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1598 -- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1599 -- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1600 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1601 -
1602 ----
1603 -
1604 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1605 -1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1606 -2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1607 -3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1608 -
1609 ----
1610 -
1611 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1612 -This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1613 -
1614 1614  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1615 1615  
1616 ----
1436 +📄 Download Full Study
1437 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
1438 +{{/expand}}
1617 1617  
1618 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1619 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1620 1620  
1621 -{{/expand}}
1441 +== Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time? ==
1622 1622  
1623 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1443 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1444 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1445 +**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1446 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1447 +**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1448 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1449 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1624 1624  
1625 -{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1626 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1627 -**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1628 -**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1629 -**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1630 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1631 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1451 +-----
1632 1632  
1633 ----
1453 +## **Key Statistics**##
1634 1634  
1635 -## **Key Statistics**
1636 1636  1. **General Observations:**
1637 - - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1638 - - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1456 + - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1457 + - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
1639 1639  
1640 1640  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1641 - - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1642 - - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1460 + - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
1461 + - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
1643 1643  
1644 1644  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1645 - - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1646 - - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1464 + - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1465 + - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1647 1647  
1648 ----
1467 +-----
1649 1649  
1650 -## **Findings**
1469 +## **Findings**##
1470 +
1651 1651  1. **Primary Observations:**
1652 - - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1653 - - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1472 + - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1473 + - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
1654 1654  
1655 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1656 - - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1657 - - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1475 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1476 + - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
1477 + - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
1658 1658  
1659 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1660 - - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1661 - - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1479 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1480 + - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1481 + - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1662 1662  
1663 ----
1483 +-----
1664 1664  
1665 -## **Critique and Observations**
1666 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1667 - - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1668 - - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1485 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1669 1669  
1670 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1671 - - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1672 - - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1487 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1488 + - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1489 + - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
1673 1673  
1674 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1675 - - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1676 - - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1491 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1492 + - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
1493 + - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
1677 1677  
1678 ----
1495 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1496 + - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1497 + - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1679 1679  
1499 +-----
1500 +
1680 1680  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1681 -- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1682 -- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1683 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1502 +- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1503 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1504 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1684 1684  
1685 ----
1506 +-----
1686 1686  
1687 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1688 -1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1689 -2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1690 -3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1508 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1691 1691  
1692 ----
1510 +1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1511 +2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1512 +3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1693 1693  
1514 +-----
1515 +
1694 1694  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1695 -This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1517 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.  ##
1696 1696  
1697 1697  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1698 1698  
1699 ----
1521 +-----
1700 1700  
1701 1701  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1702 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1703 -
1524 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
1704 1704  {{/expand}}
1705 1705  
1706 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1707 1707  
1708 -{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1709 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1710 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1711 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1712 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1713 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1714 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1528 += Whiteness & White Guilt =
1715 1715  
1716 ----
1530 +== Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports ==
1717 1717  
1718 -## **Key Statistics**
1532 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1533 +**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1534 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1535 +**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1536 +**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1537 +**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1538 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1539 +
1540 +-----
1541 +
1542 +## **Key Statistics**##
1543 +
1719 1719  1. **General Observations:**
1720 - - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1721 - - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1545 + - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1546 + - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
1722 1722  
1723 1723  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1724 - - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1725 - - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1549 + - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
1550 + - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
1726 1726  
1727 1727  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1728 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1729 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1553 + - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1554 + - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1730 1730  
1731 ----
1556 +-----
1732 1732  
1733 -## **Findings**
1558 +## **Findings**##
1559 +
1734 1734  1. **Primary Observations:**
1735 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1736 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1561 + - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1562 + - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
1737 1737  
1738 1738  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1739 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1740 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1565 + - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
1566 + - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
1741 1741  
1742 1742  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1743 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1744 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1569 + - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1570 + - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1745 1745  
1746 ----
1572 +-----
1747 1747  
1748 -## **Critique and Observations**
1574 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1575 +
1749 1749  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1750 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1751 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1577 + - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1578 + - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
1752 1752  
1753 1753  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1754 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1755 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1581 + - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
1582 + - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
1756 1756  
1757 1757  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1758 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1759 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1585 + - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1586 + - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1760 1760  
1761 ----
1588 +-----
1762 1762  
1763 1763  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1764 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1765 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1766 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1591 +- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1592 +- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1593 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1767 1767  
1768 ----
1595 +-----
1769 1769  
1770 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1771 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1772 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1773 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1597 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1774 1774  
1775 ----
1599 +1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1600 +2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1601 +3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1776 1776  
1603 +-----
1604 +
1777 1777  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1778 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1606 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
1779 1779  
1780 1780  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1781 1781  
1782 ----
1610 +-----
1783 1783  
1784 1784  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1785 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1786 -
1613 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
1787 1787  {{/expand}}
1788 1788  
1789 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1790 1790  
1791 -{{expand title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict" expanded="false"}}
1792 -**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1793 -**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1794 -**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1795 -**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1796 -**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1797 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*
1617 +== Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations ==
1798 1798  
1799 ----
1619 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1620 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1621 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1622 +**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1623 +**Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1624 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1625 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1800 1800  
1801 -## **Key Statistics**
1627 +-----
1628 +
1629 +## **Key Statistics**##
1630 +
1802 1802  1. **General Observations:**
1803 - - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1804 - - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
1632 + - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1633 + - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
1805 1805  
1806 1806  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1807 - - **Anonymity and reduced social cues** in CMC increased hostility.
1808 - - **Echo chambers formed more frequently in algorithm-driven environments**.
1636 + - **50% of medical students surveyed endorsed at least one false belief about biological differences**.
1637 + - Participants who held these false beliefs were **more likely to underestimate Black patients’ pain levels**.
1809 1809  
1810 1810  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1811 - - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1812 - - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1640 + - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1641 + - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1813 1813  
1814 ----
1643 +-----
1815 1815  
1816 -## **Findings**
1645 +## **Findings**##
1646 +
1817 1817  1. **Primary Observations:**
1818 - - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1819 - - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
1648 + - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1649 + - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
1820 1820  
1821 1821  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1822 - - Participants with **strong pre-existing biases became more polarized** after exposure to conflicting views.
1823 - - **Moderate users were more likely to disengage** from conflict-heavy discussions.
1652 + - Physicians who **did not endorse these beliefs** showed **no racial bias** in treatment recommendations.
1653 + - Bias was **strongest among first-year medical students** and decreased slightly in later years of training.
1824 1824  
1825 1825  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1826 - - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1827 - - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1656 + - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1657 + - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1828 1828  
1829 ----
1659 +-----
1830 1830  
1831 -## **Critique and Observations**
1661 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1662 +
1832 1832  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1833 - - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1834 - - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
1664 + - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1665 + - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
1835 1835  
1836 1836  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1837 - - Lacks **qualitative analysis of user motivations**.
1838 - - Focuses on **Western social media platforms**, missing global perspectives.
1668 + - The study focuses on **Black vs. white disparities**, leaving other racial/ethnic groups unexplored.
1669 + - Participants' responses were based on **hypothetical medical cases, not real-world treatment decisions**.
1839 1839  
1840 1840  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1841 - - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1842 - - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1672 + - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1673 + - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1843 1843  
1844 ----
1675 +-----
1845 1845  
1846 1846  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1847 -- Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
1848 -- Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1849 -- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
1678 +- Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1679 +- Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1680 +- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1850 1850  
1851 ----
1682 +-----
1852 1852  
1853 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1854 -1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
1855 -2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1856 -3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1684 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1857 1857  
1858 ----
1686 +1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1687 +2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1688 +3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1859 1859  
1690 +-----
1691 +
1860 1860  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1861 -This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.
1693 +This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
1862 1862  
1863 ----
1695 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1864 1864  
1865 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1866 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
1697 +-----
1867 1867  
1699 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1700 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
1868 1868  {{/expand}}
1869 1869  
1870 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1871 1871  
1704 +== Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans ==
1872 1872  
1873 -{{expand title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion" expanded="false"}}
1874 -**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
1875 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1876 -**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
1877 -**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
1878 -**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
1879 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*
1706 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1707 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1708 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1709 +**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1710 +**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1711 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1712 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1880 1880  
1881 ----
1714 +-----
1882 1882  
1883 -## **Key Statistics**
1716 +## **Key Statistics**##
1717 +
1884 1884  1. **General Observations:**
1885 - - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
1886 - - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
1719 + - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1720 + - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
1887 1887  
1888 1888  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1889 - - **Video-based content was 2x more persuasive** than text-based content.
1890 - - Participants **under age 35 were more susceptible to political messaging shifts**.
1723 + - The increase was **most pronounced among those with a high school education or less**.
1724 + - Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic mortality continued to decline over the same period.
1891 1891  
1892 1892  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1893 - - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
1894 - - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
1727 + - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1728 + - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1895 1895  
1896 ----
1730 +-----
1897 1897  
1898 -## **Findings**
1732 +## **Findings**##
1733 +
1899 1899  1. **Primary Observations:**
1900 - - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
1901 - - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
1735 + - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1736 + - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
1902 1902  
1903 1903  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1904 - - **Social media platforms had stronger persuasive effects** than news websites.
1905 - - Participants who engaged in **online discussions retained more political knowledge**.
1739 + - The **largest mortality increases** occurred among **whites without a college degree**.
1740 + - Chronic pain, functional limitations, and self-reported mental distress **rose significantly in affected groups**.
1906 1906  
1907 1907  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1908 - - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
1909 - - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
1743 + - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1744 + - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1910 1910  
1911 ----
1746 +-----
1912 1912  
1913 -## **Critique and Observations**
1748 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1749 +
1914 1914  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1915 - - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
1916 - - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
1751 + - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1752 + - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
1917 1917  
1918 1918  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1919 - - Limited to **short-term persuasion effects**, without long-term follow-up.
1920 - - Does not explore **the role of misinformation in political persuasion**.
1755 + - Does not establish **causality** between economic decline and increased mortality.
1756 + - Lacks **granular data on opioid prescribing patterns and regional differences**.
1921 1921  
1922 1922  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1923 - - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
1924 - - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
1759 + - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1760 + - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1925 1925  
1926 ----
1762 +-----
1927 1927  
1928 1928  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1929 -- Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
1930 -- Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
1931 -- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
1765 +- Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1766 +- Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1767 +- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1932 1932  
1933 ----
1769 +-----
1934 1934  
1935 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1936 -1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
1937 -2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
1938 -3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
1771 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1939 1939  
1940 ----
1773 +1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1774 +2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1775 +3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1941 1941  
1777 +-----
1778 +
1942 1942  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1943 -This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.
1780 +This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
1944 1944  
1945 ----
1782 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1946 1946  
1947 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1948 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
1784 +-----
1949 1949  
1786 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1787 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
1950 1950  {{/expand}}
1951 1951  
1952 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1953 1953  
1954 -{{expand title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA" expanded="false"}}
1955 -**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
1956 -**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
1957 -**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
1958 -**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
1959 -**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
1960 -**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*
1791 +== Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities? ==
1961 1961  
1962 ----
1793 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1794 +**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1795 +**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1796 +**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1797 +**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1798 +**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1799 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1963 1963  
1964 -## **Key Statistics**
1801 +-----
1802 +
1803 +## **Key Statistics**##
1804 +
1965 1965  1. **General Observations:**
1966 - - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
1967 - - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
1806 + - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1807 + - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
1968 1968  
1969 1969  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1970 - - Examines **West Eurasian populations** and their genetic evolution.
1971 - - Tracks **changes in allele frequencies over millennia**.
1810 + - Explores differences in **integration, social interactions, and perceptions of diversity**.
1811 + - Studies how **class, education, and neighborhood composition** affect adaptation to urban diversity.
1972 1972  
1973 1973  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1974 - - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
1975 - - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
1814 + - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1815 + - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1976 1976  
1977 ----
1817 +-----
1978 1978  
1979 -## **Findings**
1819 +## **Findings**##
1820 +
1980 1980  1. **Primary Observations:**
1981 - - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
1982 - - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
1822 + - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1823 + - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
1983 1983  
1984 1984  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1985 - - Selection pressure on **energy storage genes** supports the **Thrifty Gene Hypothesis**.
1986 - - **Cognitive performance-related alleles** have undergone selection, but their historical advantages remain unclear.
1826 + - Young, educated individuals in urban areas **are more open to cultural diversity**.
1827 + - Older and less mobile residents **report feelings of displacement and social isolation**.
1987 1987  
1988 1988  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1989 - - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
1990 - - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
1991 - - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
1830 + - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1831 + - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1992 1992  
1993 ----
1833 +-----
1994 1994  
1995 -## **Critique and Observations**
1835 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1836 +
1996 1996  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1997 - - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
1998 - - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
1838 + - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1839 + - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
1999 1999  
2000 2000  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
2001 - - Findings **may not translate directly** to modern populations.
2002 - - **Unclear whether observed selection pressures persist today**.
1842 + - Limited to **Western European urban settings**, missing perspectives from other global regions.
1843 + - Does not fully explore **policy interventions for fostering social cohesion**.
2003 2003  
2004 2004  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
2005 - - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
2006 - - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
1846 + - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1847 + - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
2007 2007  
2008 ----
1849 +-----
2009 2009  
2010 2010  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2011 -- Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
2012 -- Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
2013 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.
1852 +- Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1853 +- Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1854 +- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
2014 2014  
2015 ----
1856 +-----
2016 2016  
2017 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2018 -1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
2019 -2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
2020 -3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
1858 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2021 2021  
2022 ----
1860 +1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1861 +2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1862 +3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
2023 2023  
1864 +-----
1865 +
2024 2024  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2025 -This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.
1867 +This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
2026 2026  
2027 ----
1869 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
2028 2028  
2029 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
2030 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]
1871 +-----
2031 2031  
1873 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1874 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
2032 2032  {{/expand}}
2033 2033  
2034 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
2035 2035  
2036 -{{expand title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" expanded="false"}}
2037 -**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
2038 -**Date of Publication:** *2012*
2039 -**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
2040 -**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
2041 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
2042 -**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*
1878 += Media =
2043 2043  
2044 ----
2045 2045  
2046 -## **Key Statistics**
1881 +== Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic ==
1882 +
1883 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"}}
1884 +**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1885 +**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1886 +**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1887 +**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1888 +**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1889 +**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1890 +
1891 +-----
1892 +
1893 +## **Key Statistics**##
1894 +
2047 2047  1. **General Observations:**
2048 - - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
2049 - - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
1896 + - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1897 + - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
2050 2050  
2051 2051  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
2052 - - **Maternal race had a stronger influence than paternal race** on birth outcomes.
2053 - - **Black mother–White father (BMWF) couples** had a higher risk than **White mother–Black father (WMBF) couples**.
1900 + - **Anonymity and reduced social cues** in CMC increased hostility.
1901 + - **Echo chambers formed more frequently in algorithm-driven environments**.
2054 2054  
2055 2055  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
2056 - - **Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for key outcomes:**
2057 - - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
2058 - - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
2059 - - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
1904 + - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1905 + - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
2060 2060  
2061 ----
1907 +-----
2062 2062  
2063 -## **Findings**
1909 +## **Findings**##
1910 +
2064 2064  1. **Primary Observations:**
2065 - - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
2066 - - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
1912 + - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1913 + - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
2067 2067  
2068 2068  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
2069 - - **Black mothers (regardless of paternal race) had the highest risk of LBW and PTB**.
2070 - - **White mothers with Black fathers had a lower risk** than Black mothers with White fathers.
1916 + - Participants with **strong pre-existing biases became more polarized** after exposure to conflicting views.
1917 + - **Moderate users were more likely to disengage** from conflict-heavy discussions.
2071 2071  
2072 2072  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
2073 - - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
2074 - - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
1920 + - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1921 + - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
2075 2075  
2076 ----
1923 +-----
2077 2077  
2078 -## **Critique and Observations**
1925 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1926 +
2079 2079  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2080 - - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
2081 - - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
1928 + - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1929 + - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
2082 2082  
2083 2083  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
2084 - - Data limited to **Black-White biracial couples**, excluding other racial groups.
2085 - - **Socioeconomic and healthcare access factors** not fully explored.
1932 + - Lacks **qualitative analysis of user motivations**.
1933 + - Focuses on **Western social media platforms**, missing global perspectives.
2086 2086  
2087 2087  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
2088 - - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
2089 - - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
1936 + - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1937 + - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
2090 2090  
2091 ----
1939 +-----
2092 2092  
2093 2093  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2094 -- Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
2095 -- Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
2096 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.
1942 +- Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
1943 +- Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1944 +- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
2097 2097  
2098 ----
1946 +-----
2099 2099  
2100 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2101 -1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
2102 -2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
2103 -3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
1948 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2104 2104  
2105 ----
1950 +1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
1951 +2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1952 +3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
2106 2106  
1954 +-----
1955 +
2107 2107  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2108 -This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.
1957 +This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
2109 2109  
2110 ----
1959 +-----
2111 2111  
2112 2112  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2113 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]
2114 -
1962 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
2115 2115  {{/expand}}
2116 2116  
2117 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
2118 2118  
2119 -{{expand title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions" expanded="false"}}
1966 +== Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions ==
1967 +
1968 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
2120 2120  **Source:** *Politics & Policy*
2121 2121  **Date of Publication:** *2007*
2122 2122  **Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
2123 2123  **Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
2124 2124  **DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
2125 -**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*
1974 +**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
2126 2126  
2127 ----
1976 +-----
2128 2128  
2129 -## **Key Statistics**
1978 +## **Key Statistics**##
1979 +
2130 2130  1. **General Observations:**
2131 2131   - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
2132 2132   - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
... ... @@ -2139,9 +2139,10 @@
2139 2139   - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
2140 2140   - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
2141 2141  
2142 ----
1992 +-----
2143 2143  
2144 -## **Findings**
1994 +## **Findings**##
1995 +
2145 2145  1. **Primary Observations:**
2146 2146   - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
2147 2147   - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
... ... @@ -2154,9 +2154,10 @@
2154 2154   - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
2155 2155   - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
2156 2156  
2157 ----
2008 +-----
2158 2158  
2159 -## **Critique and Observations**
2010 +## **Critique and Observations**##
2011 +
2160 2160  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2161 2161   - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
2162 2162   - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
... ... @@ -2169,31 +2169,115 @@
2169 2169   - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
2170 2170   - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
2171 2171  
2172 ----
2024 +-----
2173 2173  
2174 2174  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
2175 2175  - Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
2176 2176  - Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
2177 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.
2029 +- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
2178 2178  
2179 ----
2031 +-----
2180 2180  
2181 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2033 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2034 +
2182 2182  1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
2183 2183  2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
2184 2184  3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
2185 2185  
2186 ----
2039 +-----
2187 2187  
2188 2188  ## **Summary of Research Study**
2189 -This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.
2042 +This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
2190 2190  
2191 ----
2044 +-----
2192 2192  
2193 2193  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
2194 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]
2047 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
2048 +{{/expand}}
2195 2195  
2050 +
2051 +== Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion ==
2052 +
2053 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
2054 +**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
2055 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
2056 +**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
2057 +**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
2058 +**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2059 +**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
2060 +
2061 +-----
2062 +
2063 +## **Key Statistics**##
2064 +
2065 +1. **General Observations:**
2066 + - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
2067 + - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
2068 +
2069 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
2070 + - **Video-based content was 2x more persuasive** than text-based content.
2071 + - Participants **under age 35 were more susceptible to political messaging shifts**.
2072 +
2073 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
2074 + - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
2075 + - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
2076 +
2077 +-----
2078 +
2079 +## **Findings**##
2080 +
2081 +1. **Primary Observations:**
2082 + - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
2083 + - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
2084 +
2085 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
2086 + - **Social media platforms had stronger persuasive effects** than news websites.
2087 + - Participants who engaged in **online discussions retained more political knowledge**.
2088 +
2089 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
2090 + - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
2091 + - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
2092 +
2093 +-----
2094 +
2095 +## **Critique and Observations**##
2096 +
2097 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2098 + - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
2099 + - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
2100 +
2101 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
2102 + - Limited to **short-term persuasion effects**, without long-term follow-up.
2103 + - Does not explore **the role of misinformation in political persuasion**.
2104 +
2105 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
2106 + - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
2107 + - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
2108 +
2109 +-----
2110 +
2111 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
2112 +- Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
2113 +- Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
2114 +- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
2115 +
2116 +-----
2117 +
2118 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2119 +
2120 +1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
2121 +2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
2122 +3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
2123 +
2124 +-----
2125 +
2126 +## **Summary of Research Study**
2127 +This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
2128 +
2129 +-----
2130 +
2131 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
2132 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
2196 2196  {{/expand}}
2197 2197  
2198 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
2199 2199