0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 72.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 05:13
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 79.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 06:48
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -11,544 +11,636 @@
11 11  - Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
12 12  - If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
13 13  
14 -{{toc/}}
15 15  
15 +
16 16  == Research Studies Repository ==
17 17  
18 18  
19 -= Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding =
20 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
21 -**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
22 -**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
23 -**Author(s):** Smith et al.
24 -**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
25 -**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
26 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
19 += Genetics =
27 27  
28 -**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
29 29  
30 -=== **Key Statistics** ===
22 +== Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History ==
31 31  
24 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
25 +**Source:** *Nature*
26 +**Date of Publication:** *2009*
27 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
28 +**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
29 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
30 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
31 +
32 +-----
33 +
34 +## **Key Statistics**##
35 +
32 32  1. **General Observations:**
33 - - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
34 - - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
37 + - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
38 + - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
35 35  
36 36  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
37 - - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
38 - - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
41 + - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
42 + - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
39 39  
40 -=== **Findings** ===
44 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
45 + - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
46 + - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
41 41  
42 -- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
43 -- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
48 +-----
44 44  
45 -=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
50 +## **Findings**##
46 46  
47 -- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
48 -- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
52 +1. **Primary Observations:**
53 + - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
54 + - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
55 +
56 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
57 + - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
58 + - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
59 +
60 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
61 + - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
62 + - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
63 +
64 +-----
65 +
66 +## **Critique and Observations**##
67 +
68 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
69 + - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
70 + - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
71 +
72 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
73 + - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
74 + - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
75 +
76 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
77 + - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
78 + - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
79 +
80 +-----
81 +
82 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
83 +- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
84 +- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
85 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
86 +
87 +-----
88 +
89 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
90 +
91 +1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
92 +2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
93 +3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
94 +
95 +-----
96 +
97 +## **Summary of Research Study**
98 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
99 +
100 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
101 +
102 +-----
103 +
104 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
105 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
49 49  {{/expand}}
50 50  
51 -{{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
52 -**Source:** [Journal/Institution Name]
53 -**Date of Publication:** [Publication Date]
54 -**Author(s):** [Author(s) Name(s)]
55 -**Title:** "[Study Title]"
56 -**DOI:** [DOI or Link]
57 -**Subject Matter:** [Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]
58 58  
59 ----
109 +== Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations ==
60 60  
61 -## **Key Statistics**
111 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
112 +**Source:** *Nature*
113 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
114 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
115 +**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
116 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
117 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
118 +
119 +-----
120 +
121 +## **Key Statistics**##
122 +
62 62  1. **General Observations:**
63 - - [Statistical finding or observation]
64 - - [Statistical finding or observation]
124 + - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
125 + - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
65 65  
66 66  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
67 - - [Breakdown of findings by gender, race, or other subgroups]
128 + - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
129 + - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
68 68  
69 69  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
70 - - [Any additional findings or significant statistics]
132 + - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
133 + - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
71 71  
72 ----
135 +-----
73 73  
74 -## **Findings**
137 +## **Findings**##
138 +
75 75  1. **Primary Observations:**
76 - - [High-level findings or trends in the study]
140 + - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
141 + - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
77 77  
78 78  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
79 - - [Disparities or differences highlighted in the study]
144 + - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
145 + - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
80 80  
81 81  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
82 - - [Detailed explanation of any notable specific findings]
148 + - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
149 + - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
83 83  
84 ----
151 +-----
85 85  
86 -## **Critique and Observations**
153 +## **Critique and Observations**##
154 +
87 87  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
88 - - [Examples: strong methodology, large dataset, etc.]
156 + - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
157 + - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
89 89  
90 90  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
91 - - [Examples: data gaps, lack of upstream analysis, etc.]
160 + - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
161 + - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
92 92  
93 93  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
94 - - [Ideas for further research or addressing limitations]
164 + - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
165 + - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
95 95  
96 ----
167 +-----
97 97  
98 98  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
99 -- [Explanation of how this study contributes to your subproject goals.]
100 -- [Any key arguments or findings that support or challenge your views.]
170 +- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
171 +- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
172 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
101 101  
102 ----
174 +-----
103 103  
104 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
105 -1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
106 -2. [Potential studies or sources to complement this analysis.]
176 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
107 107  
108 ----
178 +1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
179 +2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
180 +3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
109 109  
182 +-----
183 +
110 110  ## **Summary of Research Study**
111 -This study examines **[core research question or focus]**, providing insights into **[main subject area]**. The research utilized **[sample size and methodology]** to assess **[key variables or measured outcomes]**.
185 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
112 112  
113 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
187 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studys contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
114 114  
115 ----
189 +-----
116 116  
117 117  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
118 -{{velocity}}
119 -#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
120 -#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
121 -#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
122 -[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
123 -#else
124 -{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
125 -#end
126 -{{/velocity}}
127 -
192 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
128 128  {{/expand}}
129 129  
130 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
131 131  
196 +== Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies ==
132 132  
198 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
199 +**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
200 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
201 +**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
202 +**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
203 +**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
204 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
133 133  
134 ----
206 +-----
135 135  
136 -{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}}
137 -**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
138 -**Date of Publication:** *2020*
139 -**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
140 -**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
141 -**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
142 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*
208 +## **Key Statistics**##
143 143  
144 ----
145 -
146 -## **Key Statistics**
147 147  1. **General Observations:**
148 - - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
149 - - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
211 + - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
212 + - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
150 150  
151 151  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
152 - - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
153 - - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
215 + - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
216 + - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
154 154  
155 155  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
156 - - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
157 - - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
219 + - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
220 + - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
158 158  
159 ----
222 +-----
160 160  
161 -## **Findings**
224 +## **Findings**##
225 +
162 162  1. **Primary Observations:**
163 - - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
164 - - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
227 + - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
228 + - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
165 165  
166 166  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
167 - - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
168 - - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
231 + - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (70-80%)**.
232 + - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
169 169  
170 170  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
171 - - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
172 - - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
235 + - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
236 + - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
173 173  
174 ----
238 +-----
175 175  
176 -## **Critique and Observations**
240 +## **Critique and Observations**##
241 +
177 177  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
178 - - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
179 - - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
243 + - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
244 + - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
180 180  
181 181  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
182 - - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
183 - - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
247 + - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
248 + - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
184 184  
185 185  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
186 - - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
187 - - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
251 + - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
252 + - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
188 188  
189 ----
254 +-----
190 190  
191 191  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
192 -- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
193 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
257 +- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
258 +- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
259 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
194 194  
195 ----
261 +-----
196 196  
197 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
198 -1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
199 -2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
263 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
200 200  
201 ----
265 +1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
266 +2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
267 +3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
202 202  
269 +-----
270 +
203 203  ## **Summary of Research Study**
204 -This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.
272 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
205 205  
206 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
274 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studys contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
207 207  
208 ----
276 +-----
209 209  
210 210  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
211 -{{velocity}}
212 -#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
213 -#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
214 -#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
215 -[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
216 -#else
217 -{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
218 -#end
219 -{{/velocity}}
220 -
279 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
221 221  {{/expand}}
222 222  
223 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
224 224  
283 +== Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease ==
225 225  
226 -{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}}
227 -**Source:** *Current Psychology*
228 -**Date of Publication:** *2024*
229 -**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
230 -**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
231 -**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
232 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
285 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
286 +**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
287 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
288 +**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
289 +**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
290 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
291 +**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
233 233  
234 ----
293 +-----
235 235  
236 -## **Key Statistics**
295 +## **Key Statistics**##
296 +
237 237  1. **General Observations:**
238 - - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
239 - - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
298 + - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
299 + - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
240 240  
241 241  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
242 - - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
243 - - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
302 + - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
303 + - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
244 244  
245 245  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
246 - - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
247 - - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
306 + - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
307 + - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
248 248  
249 ----
309 +-----
250 250  
251 -## **Findings**
311 +## **Findings**##
312 +
252 252  1. **Primary Observations:**
253 - - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
254 - - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
314 + - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
315 + - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
255 255  
256 256  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
257 - - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
258 - - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
318 + - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
319 + - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
259 259  
260 260  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
261 - - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
262 - - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
322 + - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
323 + - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
263 263  
264 ----
325 +-----
265 265  
266 -## **Critique and Observations**
327 +## **Critique and Observations**##
328 +
267 267  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
268 - - **First quantitative study** on incels social isolation and mental health.
269 - - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
330 + - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
331 + - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
270 270  
271 271  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
272 - - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
273 - - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
334 + - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
335 + - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
274 274  
275 275  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
276 - - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
277 - - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
338 + - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
339 + - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
278 278  
279 ----
341 +-----
280 280  
281 281  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
282 -- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
283 -- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
284 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
344 +- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
345 +- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
346 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
285 285  
286 ----
348 +-----
287 287  
288 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
289 -1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
290 -2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
291 -3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
350 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
292 292  
293 ----
352 +1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
353 +2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
354 +3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
294 294  
356 +-----
357 +
295 295  ## **Summary of Research Study**
296 -This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.
359 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
297 297  
298 298  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
299 299  
300 ----
363 +-----
301 301  
302 302  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
303 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
304 -
366 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
305 305  {{/expand}}
306 306  
307 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
308 308  
309 -{{expand title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" expanded="false"}} Source: Addictive Behaviors
310 -Date of Publication: 2016
311 -Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
312 -Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
313 -DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
314 -Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
370 +== Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA ==
315 315  
316 -Key Statistics
317 -General Observations:
372 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
373 +**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
374 +**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
375 +**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
376 +**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
377 +**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
378 +**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
318 318  
319 -Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
320 -Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
321 -Subgroup Analysis:
380 +-----
322 322  
323 -Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
324 -Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
325 -Other Significant Data Points:
382 +## **Key Statistics**##
326 326  
327 -Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
328 -Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
329 -Findings
330 -Primary Observations:
384 +1. **General Observations:**
385 + - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
386 + - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
331 331  
332 -Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
333 -Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
334 -Subgroup Trends:
388 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
389 + - Examines **West Eurasian populations** and their genetic evolution.
390 + - Tracks **changes in allele frequencies over millennia**.
335 335  
336 -Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
337 -College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
338 -Specific Case Analysis:
392 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
393 + - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
394 + - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
339 339  
340 -Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
341 -Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
342 -Critique and Observations
343 -Strengths of the Study:
396 +-----
344 344  
345 -Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
346 -Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
347 -Limitations of the Study:
398 +## **Findings**##
348 348  
349 -Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
350 -Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
351 -Suggestions for Improvement:
400 +1. **Primary Observations:**
401 + - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
402 + - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
352 352  
353 -Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
354 -Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
355 -Relevance to Subproject
356 -Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
357 -Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
358 -Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
359 -Suggestions for Further Exploration
360 -Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
361 -Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
362 -Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
363 -Summary of Research Study
364 -This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
404 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
405 + - Selection pressure on **energy storage genes** supports the **Thrifty Gene Hypothesis**.
406 + - **Cognitive performance-related alleles** have undergone selection, but their historical advantages remain unclear.
365 365  
366 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
408 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
409 + - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
410 + - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
411 + - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
367 367  
368 -📄 Download Full Study
369 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
413 +-----
370 370  
415 +## **Critique and Observations**##
416 +
417 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
418 + - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
419 + - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
420 +
421 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
422 + - Findings **may not translate directly** to modern populations.
423 + - **Unclear whether observed selection pressures persist today**.
424 +
425 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
426 + - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
427 + - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
428 +
429 +-----
430 +
431 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
432 +- Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
433 +- Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
434 +- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
435 +
436 +-----
437 +
438 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
439 +
440 +1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
441 +2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
442 +3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
443 +
444 +-----
445 +
446 +## **Summary of Research Study**
447 +This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
448 +
449 +-----
450 +
451 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
452 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
371 371  {{/expand}}
372 372  
373 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
374 374  
375 -{{expand title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?" expanded="false"}}
376 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
377 -**Date of Publication:** *2014*
378 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
379 -**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
380 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
381 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
456 +== Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age ==
382 382  
383 ----
458 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
459 +**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
460 +**Date of Publication:** *2013*
461 +**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
462 +**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
463 +**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
464 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
384 384  
385 -## **Key Statistics**
466 +-----
467 +
468 +## **Key Statistics**##
469 +
386 386  1. **General Observations:**
387 - - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
388 - - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
471 + - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
472 + - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
389 389  
390 390  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
391 - - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
392 - - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
475 + - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
476 + - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
393 393  
394 394  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
395 - - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
396 - - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
479 + - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
480 + - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
397 397  
398 ----
482 +-----
399 399  
400 -## **Findings**
484 +## **Findings**##
485 +
401 401  1. **Primary Observations:**
402 - - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
403 - - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
487 + - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
488 + - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
404 404  
405 405  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
406 - - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
407 - - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
491 + - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
492 + - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
408 408  
409 409  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
410 - - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
411 - - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
495 + - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
496 + - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
412 412  
413 ----
498 +-----
414 414  
415 -## **Critique and Observations**
500 +## **Critique and Observations**##
501 +
416 416  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
417 - - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
418 - - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
503 + - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
504 + - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
419 419  
420 420  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
421 - - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
422 - - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
507 + - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
508 + - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
423 423  
424 424  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
425 - - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
426 - - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
511 + - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
512 + - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
427 427  
428 ----
514 +-----
429 429  
430 430  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
431 -- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
432 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
433 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
517 +- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
518 +- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
519 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
434 434  
435 ----
521 +-----
436 436  
437 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
438 -1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
439 -2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
440 -3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
523 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
441 441  
442 ----
525 +1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
526 +2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
527 +3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
443 443  
529 +-----
530 +
444 444  ## **Summary of Research Study**
445 -This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.
532 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
446 446  
447 447  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
448 448  
449 ----
536 +-----
450 450  
451 451  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
452 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
453 -
539 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
454 454  {{/expand}}
455 455  
456 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
457 457  
458 -{{expand title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation" expanded="false"}}
459 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
460 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
461 -**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
462 -**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
463 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
464 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
543 +== Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications ==
465 465  
466 ----
545 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
546 +**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
547 +**Date of Publication:** *2010*
548 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
549 +**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
550 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
551 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
467 467  
468 -## **Key Statistics**
553 +-----
554 +
555 +## **Key Statistics**##
556 +
469 469  1. **General Observations:**
470 - - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
471 - - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
558 + - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
559 + - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
472 472  
473 473  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
474 - - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
475 - - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
562 + - Discusses **four primary definitions of race/subspecies**: Essentialist, Taxonomic, Population-based, and Lineage-based.
563 + - Suggests that **human heterozygosity levels are comparable to species that are classified as polytypic**.
476 476  
477 477  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
478 - - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
479 - - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
566 + - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
567 + - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
480 480  
481 ----
569 +-----
482 482  
483 -## **Findings**
571 +## **Findings**##
572 +
484 484  1. **Primary Observations:**
485 - - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
486 - - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
574 + - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
575 + - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
487 487  
488 488  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
489 - - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
490 - - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
578 + - Discusses **how race concepts evolved over time** in biological sciences.
579 + - Compares **human diversity with that of other primates** such as chimpanzees and gorillas.
491 491  
492 492  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
493 - - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
494 - - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
582 + - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
583 + - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
495 495  
496 ----
585 +-----
497 497  
498 -## **Critique and Observations**
587 +## **Critique and Observations**##
588 +
499 499  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
500 - - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
501 - - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
590 + - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
591 + - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
502 502  
503 503  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
504 - - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
505 - - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
594 + - Controversial topic with **strong opposing views in anthropology and genetics**.
595 + - **Relies on broad genetic trends**, but does not analyze individual-level genetic variation in depth.
506 506  
507 507  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
508 - - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
509 - - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
598 + - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
599 + - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
510 510  
511 ----
601 +-----
512 512  
513 513  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
514 -- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
515 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
516 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
604 +- Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
605 +- Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
606 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
517 517  
518 ----
608 +-----
519 519  
520 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
521 -1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
522 -2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
523 -3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
610 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
524 524  
525 ----
612 +1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
613 +2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
614 +3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
526 526  
616 +-----
617 +
527 527  ## **Summary of Research Study**
528 -This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.
619 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
529 529  
530 530  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
531 531  
532 ----
623 +-----
533 533  
534 534  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
535 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
536 -
626 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
537 537  {{/expand}}
538 538  
539 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
540 540  
541 -{{expand title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media" expanded="false"}}
630 +== Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media ==
631 +
632 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
542 542  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
543 543  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
544 544  **Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
545 545  **Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
546 546  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
547 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
638 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
548 548  
549 ----
640 +-----
550 550  
551 -## **Key Statistics**
642 +## **Key Statistics**##
643 +
552 552  1. **General Observations:**
553 553   - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
554 554   - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
... ... @@ -561,9 +561,10 @@
561 561   - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
562 562   - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
563 563  
564 ----
656 +-----
565 565  
566 -## **Findings**
658 +## **Findings**##
659 +
567 567  1. **Primary Observations:**
568 568   - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
569 569   - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
... ... @@ -576,9 +576,10 @@
576 576   - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
577 577   - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
578 578  
579 ----
672 +-----
580 580  
581 -## **Critique and Observations**
674 +## **Critique and Observations**##
675 +
582 582  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
583 583   - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
584 584   - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
... ... @@ -591,631 +591,948 @@
591 591   - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
592 592   - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
593 593  
594 ----
688 +-----
595 595  
596 596  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
597 597  - Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
598 598  - Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
599 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
693 +- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
600 600  
601 ----
695 +-----
602 602  
603 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
697 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
698 +
604 604  1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
605 605  2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
606 606  3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
607 607  
608 ----
703 +-----
609 609  
610 610  ## **Summary of Research Study**
611 -This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.
706 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
612 612  
613 613  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
614 614  
615 ----
710 +-----
616 616  
617 617  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
618 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
619 -
713 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
620 620  {{/expand}}
621 621  
622 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
623 623  
624 -{{expand title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications" expanded="false"}}
625 -**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
626 -**Date of Publication:** *2010*
627 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
628 -**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
629 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
630 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
717 +== Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation ==
631 631  
632 ----
719 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
720 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
721 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
722 +**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
723 +**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
724 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
725 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
633 633  
634 -## **Key Statistics**
727 +-----
728 +
729 +## **Key Statistics**##
730 +
635 635  1. **General Observations:**
636 - - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
637 - - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
732 + - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
733 + - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
638 638  
639 639  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
640 - - Discusses **four primary definitions of race/subspecies**: Essentialist, Taxonomic, Population-based, and Lineage-based.
641 - - Suggests that **human heterozygosity levels are comparable to species that are classified as polytypic**.
736 + - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
737 + - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
642 642  
643 643  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
644 - - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
645 - - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
740 + - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
741 + - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
646 646  
647 ----
743 +-----
648 648  
649 -## **Findings**
745 +## **Findings**##
746 +
650 650  1. **Primary Observations:**
651 - - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
652 - - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
748 + - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
749 + - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
653 653  
654 654  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
655 - - Discusses **how race concepts evolved over time** in biological sciences.
656 - - Compares **human diversity with that of other primates** such as chimpanzees and gorillas.
752 + - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
753 + - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
657 657  
658 658  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
659 - - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
660 - - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
756 + - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
757 + - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
661 661  
662 ----
759 +-----
663 663  
664 -## **Critique and Observations**
761 +## **Critique and Observations**##
762 +
665 665  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
666 - - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
667 - - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
764 + - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
765 + - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
668 668  
669 669  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
670 - - Controversial topic with **strong opposing views in anthropology and genetics**.
671 - - **Relies on broad genetic trends**, but does not analyze individual-level genetic variation in depth.
768 + - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
769 + - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
672 672  
673 673  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
674 - - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
675 - - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
772 + - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
773 + - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
676 676  
677 ----
775 +-----
678 678  
679 679  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
680 -- Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
681 -- Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
682 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
778 +- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
779 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
780 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
683 683  
684 ----
782 +-----
685 685  
686 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
687 -1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
688 -2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
689 -3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
784 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
690 690  
691 ----
786 +1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
787 +2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
788 +3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
692 692  
790 +-----
791 +
693 693  ## **Summary of Research Study**
694 -This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.
793 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.  ##
695 695  
696 696  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
697 697  
698 ----
797 +-----
699 699  
700 700  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
701 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
800 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
801 +{{/expand}}
702 702  
803 +
804 +== Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding ==
805 +
806 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
807 +**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
808 +**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
809 +**Author(s):** Smith et al.
810 +**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
811 +**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
812 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science 
813 +
814 +**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
815 +
816 +=== **Key Statistics** ===
817 +
818 +1. **General Observations:**
819 + - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
820 + - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
821 +
822 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
823 + - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
824 + - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
825 +
826 +=== **Findings** ===
827 +
828 +- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
829 +- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
830 +
831 +=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
832 +
833 +- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
834 +- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
703 703  {{/expand}}
704 704  
705 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
706 706  
707 -{{expand title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age" expanded="false"}}
708 -**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
709 -**Date of Publication:** *2013*
710 -**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
711 -**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
712 -**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
713 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
838 +-----
714 714  
715 ----
840 += Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
716 716  
717 -## **Key Statistics**
842 +
843 +== Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018 ==
844 +
845 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
846 +**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
847 +**Date of Publication:** *2020*
848 +**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
849 +**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
850 +**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
851 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
852 +
853 +-----
854 +
855 +## **Key Statistics**##
856 +
718 718  1. **General Observations:**
719 - - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
720 - - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
858 + - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
859 + - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
721 721  
722 722  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
723 - - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
724 - - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
862 + - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
863 + - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
725 725  
726 726  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
727 - - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
728 - - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
866 + - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
867 + - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
729 729  
730 ----
869 +-----
731 731  
732 -## **Findings**
871 +## **Findings**##
872 +
733 733  1. **Primary Observations:**
734 - - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
735 - - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
874 + - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
875 + - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
736 736  
737 737  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
738 - - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
739 - - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
878 + - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
879 + - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
740 740  
741 741  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
742 - - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
743 - - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
882 + - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
883 + - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
744 744  
745 ----
885 +-----
746 746  
747 -## **Critique and Observations**
887 +## **Critique and Observations**##
888 +
748 748  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
749 - - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
750 - - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
890 + - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
891 + - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
751 751  
752 752  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
753 - - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
754 - - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
894 + - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
895 + - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
755 755  
756 756  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
757 - - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
758 - - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
898 + - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
899 + - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
759 759  
760 ----
901 +-----
761 761  
762 762  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
763 -- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
764 -- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
765 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
904 +- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
905 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
766 766  
767 ----
907 +-----
768 768  
769 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
770 -1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
771 -2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
772 -3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
909 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
773 773  
774 ----
911 +1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
912 +2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
775 775  
914 +-----
915 +
776 776  ## **Summary of Research Study**
777 -This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.
917 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.  ##
778 778  
779 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studys contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
919 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
780 780  
781 ----
921 +-----
782 782  
783 783  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
784 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
924 +{{velocity}}
925 +#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
926 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
927 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
928 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
929 +#else
930 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
931 +#end {{/velocity}}##
932 +{{/expand}}
785 785  
934 +
935 +== Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ==
936 +
937 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
938 +**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
939 +**Date of Publication:** *2012*
940 +**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
941 +**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
942 +**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
943 +**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
944 +
945 +-----
946 +
947 +## **Key Statistics**##
948 +
949 +1. **General Observations:**
950 + - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
951 + - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
952 +
953 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
954 + - **Maternal race had a stronger influence than paternal race** on birth outcomes.
955 + - **Black mother–White father (BMWF) couples** had a higher risk than **White mother–Black father (WMBF) couples**.
956 +
957 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
958 + - **Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for key outcomes:**
959 + - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
960 + - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
961 + - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
962 +
963 +-----
964 +
965 +## **Findings**##
966 +
967 +1. **Primary Observations:**
968 + - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
969 + - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
970 +
971 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
972 + - **Black mothers (regardless of paternal race) had the highest risk of LBW and PTB**.
973 + - **White mothers with Black fathers had a lower risk** than Black mothers with White fathers.
974 +
975 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
976 + - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
977 + - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
978 +
979 +-----
980 +
981 +## **Critique and Observations**##
982 +
983 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
984 + - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
985 + - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
986 +
987 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
988 + - Data limited to **Black-White biracial couples**, excluding other racial groups.
989 + - **Socioeconomic and healthcare access factors** not fully explored.
990 +
991 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
992 + - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
993 + - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
994 +
995 +-----
996 +
997 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
998 +- Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
999 +- Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
1000 +- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
1001 +
1002 +-----
1003 +
1004 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1005 +
1006 +1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
1007 +2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
1008 +3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
1009 +
1010 +-----
1011 +
1012 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1013 +This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
1014 +
1015 +-----
1016 +
1017 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1018 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
786 786  {{/expand}}
787 787  
788 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
789 789  
790 -{{expand title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports" expanded="false"}}
791 -**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
792 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
793 -**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
794 -**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
795 -**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
796 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
1022 +== Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness ==
797 797  
798 ----
1024 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
1025 +**Source:** *Current Psychology*
1026 +**Date of Publication:** *2024*
1027 +**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
1028 +**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
1029 +**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
1030 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
799 799  
800 -## **Key Statistics**
1032 +-----
1033 +
1034 +## **Key Statistics**##
1035 +
801 801  1. **General Observations:**
802 - - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
803 - - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
1037 + - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
1038 + - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
804 804  
805 805  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
806 - - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
807 - - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
1041 + - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
1042 + - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
808 808  
809 809  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
810 - - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
811 - - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1045 + - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
1046 + - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
812 812  
813 ----
1048 +-----
814 814  
815 -## **Findings**
1050 +## **Findings**##
1051 +
816 816  1. **Primary Observations:**
817 - - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
818 - - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
1053 + - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
1054 + - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
819 819  
820 820  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
821 - - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
822 - - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
1057 + - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
1058 + - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
823 823  
824 824  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
825 - - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
826 - - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1061 + - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
1062 + - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
827 827  
828 ----
1064 +-----
829 829  
830 -## **Critique and Observations**
1066 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1067 +
831 831  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
832 - - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
833 - - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
1069 + - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
1070 + - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
834 834  
835 835  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
836 - - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
837 - - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
1073 + - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
1074 + - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
838 838  
839 839  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
840 - - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
841 - - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1077 + - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
1078 + - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
842 842  
843 ----
1080 +-----
844 844  
845 845  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
846 -- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
847 -- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
848 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
1083 +- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
1084 +- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
1085 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
849 849  
850 ----
1087 +-----
851 851  
852 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
853 -1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
854 -2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
855 -3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1089 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
856 856  
857 ----
1091 +1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
1092 +2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
1093 +3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
858 858  
1095 +-----
1096 +
859 859  ## **Summary of Research Study**
860 -This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.
1098 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
861 861  
862 862  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
863 863  
864 ----
1102 +-----
865 865  
866 866  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
867 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
868 -
1105 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
869 869  {{/expand}}
870 870  
871 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
872 872  
873 -{{expand title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History" expanded="false"}}
874 -**Source:** *Nature*
875 -**Date of Publication:** *2009*
876 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
877 -**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
878 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
879 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*
1109 += Crime and Substance Abuse =
880 880  
881 ----
882 882  
883 -## **Key Statistics**
1112 +== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1113 +
1114 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1115 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1116 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1117 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1118 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1119 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1120 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1121 +
1122 +-----
1123 +
1124 +## **Key Statistics**##
1125 +
884 884  1. **General Observations:**
885 - - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
886 - - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
1127 + - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1128 + - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
887 887  
888 888  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
889 - - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
890 - - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
1131 + - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1132 + - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
891 891  
892 892  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
893 - - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
894 - - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
1135 + - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1136 + - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
895 895  
896 ----
1138 +-----
897 897  
898 -## **Findings**
1140 +## **Findings**##
1141 +
899 899  1. **Primary Observations:**
900 - - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
901 - - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
1143 + - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1144 + - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
902 902  
903 903  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
904 - - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
905 - - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
1147 + - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1148 + - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
906 906  
907 907  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
908 - - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
909 - - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
1151 + - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1152 + - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
910 910  
911 ----
1154 +-----
912 912  
913 -## **Critique and Observations**
1156 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1157 +
914 914  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
915 - - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
916 - - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
1159 + - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1160 + - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
917 917  
918 918  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
919 - - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
920 - - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
1163 + - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1164 + - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
921 921  
922 922  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
923 - - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
924 - - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
1167 + - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1168 + - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
925 925  
926 ----
1170 +-----
927 927  
928 928  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
929 -- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
930 -- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
931 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
1173 +- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1174 +- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1175 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
932 932  
933 ----
1177 +-----
934 934  
935 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
936 -1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
937 -2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
938 -3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
1179 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
939 939  
940 ----
1181 +1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1182 +2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1183 +3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
941 941  
1185 +-----
1186 +
942 942  ## **Summary of Research Study**
943 -This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.
1188 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
944 944  
945 945  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
946 946  
947 ----
1192 +-----
948 948  
949 949  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
950 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
1195 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1196 +{{/expand}}
951 951  
1198 +
1199 +== Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1200 +
1201 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1202 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1203 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1204 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1205 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1206 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1207 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1208 +
1209 +-----
1210 +
1211 +## **Key Statistics**##
1212 +
1213 +1. **General Observations:**
1214 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1215 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1216 +
1217 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1218 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1219 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1220 +
1221 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1222 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1223 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1224 +
1225 +-----
1226 +
1227 +## **Findings**##
1228 +
1229 +1. **Primary Observations:**
1230 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1231 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1232 +
1233 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1234 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1235 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1236 +
1237 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1238 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1239 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1240 +
1241 +-----
1242 +
1243 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1244 +
1245 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1246 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1247 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1248 +
1249 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1250 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1251 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1252 +
1253 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1254 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1255 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1256 +
1257 +-----
1258 +
1259 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1260 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1261 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1262 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
1263 +
1264 +-----
1265 +
1266 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1267 +
1268 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1269 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1270 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1271 +
1272 +-----
1273 +
1274 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1275 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
1276 +
1277 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1278 +
1279 +-----
1280 +
1281 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1282 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
952 952  {{/expand}}
953 953  
954 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
955 955  
1286 +== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
956 956  
957 -{{expand title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations" expanded="false"}}
958 -**Source:** *Nature*
959 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
960 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
961 -**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
962 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
963 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
1288 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1289 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1290 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1291 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1292 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1293 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1294 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
964 964  
965 ----
1296 +-----
966 966  
967 -## **Key Statistics**
1298 +## **Key Statistics**##
1299 +
968 968  1. **General Observations:**
969 - - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
970 - - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
1301 + - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1302 + - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
971 971  
972 972  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
973 - - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
974 - - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
1305 + - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1306 + - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
975 975  
976 976  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
977 - - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
978 - - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
1309 + - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1310 + - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
979 979  
980 ----
1312 +-----
981 981  
982 -## **Findings**
1314 +## **Findings**##
1315 +
983 983  1. **Primary Observations:**
984 - - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
985 - - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
1317 + - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1318 + - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
986 986  
987 987  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
988 - - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
989 - - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
1321 + - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1322 + - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
990 990  
991 991  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
992 - - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
993 - - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
1325 + - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1326 + - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
994 994  
995 ----
1328 +-----
996 996  
997 -## **Critique and Observations**
1330 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1331 +
998 998  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
999 - - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
1000 - - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
1333 + - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1334 + - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1001 1001  
1002 1002  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1003 - - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
1004 - - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
1337 + - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1338 + - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1005 1005  
1006 1006  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1007 - - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
1008 - - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
1341 + - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1342 + - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1009 1009  
1010 ----
1344 +-----
1011 1011  
1012 1012  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1013 -- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
1014 -- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
1015 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
1347 +- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1348 +- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1349 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1016 1016  
1017 ----
1351 +-----
1018 1018  
1019 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1020 -1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
1021 -2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
1022 -3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
1353 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1023 1023  
1024 ----
1355 +1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1356 +2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1357 +3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1025 1025  
1359 +-----
1360 +
1026 1026  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1027 -This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.
1362 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1028 1028  
1029 1029  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1030 1030  
1031 ----
1366 +-----
1032 1032  
1033 1033  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1034 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
1369 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1370 +{{/expand}}
1035 1035  
1372 +
1373 +== Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults ==
1374 +
1375 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1376 + Source: Addictive Behaviors
1377 +Date of Publication: 2016
1378 +Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
1379 +Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
1380 +DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
1381 +Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
1382 +
1383 +Key Statistics
1384 +General Observations:
1385 +
1386 +Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
1387 +Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
1388 +Subgroup Analysis:
1389 +
1390 +Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
1391 +Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
1392 +Other Significant Data Points:
1393 +
1394 +Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
1395 +Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
1396 +Findings
1397 +Primary Observations:
1398 +
1399 +Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
1400 +Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
1401 +Subgroup Trends:
1402 +
1403 +Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
1404 +College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
1405 +Specific Case Analysis:
1406 +
1407 +Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
1408 +Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
1409 +Critique and Observations
1410 +Strengths of the Study:
1411 +
1412 +Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
1413 +Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
1414 +Limitations of the Study:
1415 +
1416 +Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
1417 +Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
1418 +Suggestions for Improvement:
1419 +
1420 +Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
1421 +Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
1422 +Relevance to Subproject
1423 +Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
1424 +Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
1425 +Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
1426 +Suggestions for Further Exploration
1427 +Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
1428 +Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
1429 +Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
1430 +Summary of Research Study
1431 +This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
1432 +
1433 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1434 +
1435 +📄 Download Full Study
1436 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
1036 1036  {{/expand}}
1037 1037  
1038 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1039 1039  
1040 -{{expand title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies" expanded="false"}}
1041 -**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
1042 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1043 -**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
1044 -**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
1045 -**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
1046 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
1440 +== Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time? ==
1047 1047  
1048 ----
1442 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1443 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1444 +**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1445 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1446 +**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1447 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1448 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1049 1049  
1050 -## **Key Statistics**
1450 +-----
1451 +
1452 +## **Key Statistics**##
1453 +
1051 1051  1. **General Observations:**
1052 - - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
1053 - - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
1455 + - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1456 + - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
1054 1054  
1055 1055  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1056 - - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
1057 - - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
1459 + - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
1460 + - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
1058 1058  
1059 1059  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1060 - - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
1061 - - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
1463 + - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1464 + - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1062 1062  
1063 ----
1466 +-----
1064 1064  
1065 -## **Findings**
1468 +## **Findings**##
1469 +
1066 1066  1. **Primary Observations:**
1067 - - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
1068 - - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
1471 + - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1472 + - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
1069 1069  
1070 1070  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1071 - - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (~70-80%)**.
1072 - - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
1475 + - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
1476 + - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
1073 1073  
1074 1074  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1075 - - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
1076 - - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
1479 + - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1480 + - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1077 1077  
1078 ----
1482 +-----
1079 1079  
1080 -## **Critique and Observations**
1484 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1485 +
1081 1081  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1082 - - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
1083 - - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
1487 + - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1488 + - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
1084 1084  
1085 1085  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1086 - - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
1087 - - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
1491 + - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
1492 + - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
1088 1088  
1089 1089  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1090 - - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
1091 - - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
1495 + - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1496 + - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1092 1092  
1093 ----
1498 +-----
1094 1094  
1095 1095  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1096 -- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
1097 -- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
1098 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
1501 +- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1502 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1503 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1099 1099  
1100 ----
1505 +-----
1101 1101  
1102 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1103 -1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
1104 -2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
1105 -3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
1507 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1106 1106  
1107 ----
1509 +1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1510 +2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1511 +3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1108 1108  
1513 +-----
1514 +
1109 1109  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1110 -This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.
1516 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.  ##
1111 1111  
1112 1112  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1113 1113  
1114 ----
1520 +-----
1115 1115  
1116 1116  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1117 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
1118 -
1523 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
1119 1119  {{/expand}}
1120 1120  
1121 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1122 1122  
1123 -{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}}
1124 -**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
1125 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1126 -**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
1127 -**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
1128 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
1129 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*
1527 += Whiteness & White Guilt =
1130 1130  
1131 ----
1529 +== Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports ==
1132 1132  
1133 -## **Key Statistics**
1531 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1532 +**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1533 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1534 +**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1535 +**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1536 +**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1537 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1538 +
1539 +-----
1540 +
1541 +## **Key Statistics**##
1542 +
1134 1134  1. **General Observations:**
1135 - - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
1136 - - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
1544 + - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1545 + - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
1137 1137  
1138 1138  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1139 - - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
1140 - - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
1548 + - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
1549 + - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
1141 1141  
1142 1142  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1143 - - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
1144 - - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
1552 + - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1553 + - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1145 1145  
1146 ----
1555 +-----
1147 1147  
1148 -## **Findings**
1557 +## **Findings**##
1558 +
1149 1149  1. **Primary Observations:**
1150 - - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
1151 - - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
1560 + - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1561 + - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
1152 1152  
1153 1153  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1154 - - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
1155 - - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
1564 + - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
1565 + - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
1156 1156  
1157 1157  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1158 - - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
1159 - - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
1568 + - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1569 + - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1160 1160  
1161 ----
1571 +-----
1162 1162  
1163 -## **Critique and Observations**
1573 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1574 +
1164 1164  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1165 - - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
1166 - - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
1576 + - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1577 + - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
1167 1167  
1168 1168  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1169 - - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
1170 - - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
1580 + - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
1581 + - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
1171 1171  
1172 1172  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1173 - - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
1174 - - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
1584 + - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1585 + - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1175 1175  
1176 ----
1587 +-----
1177 1177  
1178 1178  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1179 -- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
1180 -- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
1181 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
1590 +- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1591 +- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1592 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1182 1182  
1183 ----
1594 +-----
1184 1184  
1185 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1186 -1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
1187 -2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
1188 -3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
1596 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1189 1189  
1190 ----
1598 +1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1599 +2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1600 +3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1191 1191  
1602 +-----
1603 +
1192 1192  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1193 -This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.
1605 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
1194 1194  
1195 1195  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1196 1196  
1197 ----
1609 +-----
1198 1198  
1199 1199  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1200 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
1201 -
1612 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
1202 1202  {{/expand}}
1203 1203  
1204 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1205 1205  
1616 +== Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations ==
1206 1206  
1207 -
1208 -{{expand title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations" expanded="false"}}
1618 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1209 1209  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1210 1210  **Date of Publication:** *2016*
1211 1211  **Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1212 1212  **Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1213 1213  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1214 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1624 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1215 1215  
1216 ----
1626 +-----
1217 1217  
1218 -## **Key Statistics**
1628 +## **Key Statistics**##
1629 +
1219 1219  1. **General Observations:**
1220 1220   - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1221 1221   - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
... ... @@ -1228,9 +1228,10 @@
1228 1228   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1229 1229   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1230 1230  
1231 ----
1642 +-----
1232 1232  
1233 -## **Findings**
1644 +## **Findings**##
1645 +
1234 1234  1. **Primary Observations:**
1235 1235   - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1236 1236   - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
... ... @@ -1243,9 +1243,10 @@
1243 1243   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1244 1244   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1245 1245  
1246 ----
1658 +-----
1247 1247  
1248 -## **Critique and Observations**
1660 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1661 +
1249 1249  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1250 1250   - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1251 1251   - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
... ... @@ -1258,48 +1258,49 @@
1258 1258   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1259 1259   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1260 1260  
1261 ----
1674 +-----
1262 1262  
1263 1263  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1264 1264  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1265 1265  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1266 -- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1679 +- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1267 1267  
1268 ----
1681 +-----
1269 1269  
1270 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1683 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1684 +
1271 1271  1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1272 1272  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1273 1273  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1274 1274  
1275 ----
1689 +-----
1276 1276  
1277 1277  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1278 -This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.
1692 +This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
1279 1279  
1280 1280  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1281 1281  
1282 ----
1696 +-----
1283 1283  
1284 1284  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1285 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1286 -
1699 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
1287 1287  {{/expand}}
1288 1288  
1289 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1290 1290  
1703 +== Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans ==
1291 1291  
1292 -{{expand title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans" expanded="false"}}
1705 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1293 1293  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1294 1294  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
1295 1295  **Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1296 1296  **Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1297 1297  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1298 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1711 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1299 1299  
1300 ----
1713 +-----
1301 1301  
1302 -## **Key Statistics**
1715 +## **Key Statistics**##
1716 +
1303 1303  1. **General Observations:**
1304 1304   - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1305 1305   - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
... ... @@ -1312,9 +1312,10 @@
1312 1312   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1313 1313   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1314 1314  
1315 ----
1729 +-----
1316 1316  
1317 -## **Findings**
1731 +## **Findings**##
1732 +
1318 1318  1. **Primary Observations:**
1319 1319   - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1320 1320   - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
... ... @@ -1327,9 +1327,10 @@
1327 1327   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1328 1328   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1329 1329  
1330 ----
1745 +-----
1331 1331  
1332 -## **Critique and Observations**
1747 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1748 +
1333 1333  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1334 1334   - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1335 1335   - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
... ... @@ -1342,47 +1342,49 @@
1342 1342   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1343 1343   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1344 1344  
1345 ----
1761 +-----
1346 1346  
1347 1347  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1348 1348  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1349 1349  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1350 -- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1766 +- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1351 1351  
1352 ----
1768 +-----
1353 1353  
1354 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1770 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1771 +
1355 1355  1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1356 1356  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1357 1357  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1358 1358  
1359 ----
1776 +-----
1360 1360  
1361 1361  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1362 -This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.
1779 +This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
1363 1363  
1364 1364  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1365 1365  
1366 ----
1783 +-----
1367 1367  
1368 1368  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1369 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1370 -
1786 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
1371 1371  {{/expand}}
1372 1372  
1373 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1374 1374  
1375 -{{expand title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?" expanded="false"}}
1790 +== Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities? ==
1791 +
1792 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1376 1376  **Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1377 1377  **Date of Publication:** *2023*
1378 1378  **Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1379 1379  **Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1380 1380  **DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1381 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1798 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1382 1382  
1383 ----
1800 +-----
1384 1384  
1385 -## **Key Statistics**
1802 +## **Key Statistics**##
1803 +
1386 1386  1. **General Observations:**
1387 1387   - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1388 1388   - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
... ... @@ -1395,9 +1395,10 @@
1395 1395   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1396 1396   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1397 1397  
1398 ----
1816 +-----
1399 1399  
1400 -## **Findings**
1818 +## **Findings**##
1819 +
1401 1401  1. **Primary Observations:**
1402 1402   - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1403 1403   - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
... ... @@ -1410,9 +1410,10 @@
1410 1410   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1411 1411   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1412 1412  
1413 ----
1832 +-----
1414 1414  
1415 -## **Critique and Observations**
1834 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1835 +
1416 1416  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1417 1417   - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1418 1418   - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
... ... @@ -1425,366 +1425,291 @@
1425 1425   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1426 1426   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1427 1427  
1428 ----
1848 +-----
1429 1429  
1430 1430  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1431 1431  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1432 1432  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1433 -- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1853 +- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
1434 1434  
1435 ----
1855 +-----
1436 1436  
1437 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1857 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1858 +
1438 1438  1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1439 1439  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1440 1440  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1441 1441  
1442 ----
1863 +-----
1443 1443  
1444 1444  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1445 -This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.
1866 +This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
1446 1446  
1447 1447  This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1448 1448  
1449 ----
1870 +-----
1450 1450  
1451 1451  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1452 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1453 -
1873 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
1454 1454  {{/expand}}
1455 1455  
1456 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1457 1457  
1458 -{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1459 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1460 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1461 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1462 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1463 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1464 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1877 += Media =
1465 1465  
1466 ----
1467 1467  
1468 -## **Key Statistics**
1880 +== Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic ==
1881 +
1882 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"}}
1883 +**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1884 +**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1885 +**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1886 +**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1887 +**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1888 +**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1889 +
1890 +-----
1891 +
1892 +## **Key Statistics**##
1893 +
1469 1469  1. **General Observations:**
1470 - - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1471 - - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1895 + - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1896 + - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
1472 1472  
1473 1473  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1474 - - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1475 - - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1899 + - **Anonymity and reduced social cues** in CMC increased hostility.
1900 + - **Echo chambers formed more frequently in algorithm-driven environments**.
1476 1476  
1477 1477  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1478 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1479 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1903 + - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1904 + - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1480 1480  
1481 ----
1906 +-----
1482 1482  
1483 -## **Findings**
1908 +## **Findings**##
1909 +
1484 1484  1. **Primary Observations:**
1485 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1486 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1911 + - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1912 + - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
1487 1487  
1488 1488  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1489 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1490 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1915 + - Participants with **strong pre-existing biases became more polarized** after exposure to conflicting views.
1916 + - **Moderate users were more likely to disengage** from conflict-heavy discussions.
1491 1491  
1492 1492  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1493 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1494 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1919 + - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1920 + - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1495 1495  
1496 ----
1922 +-----
1497 1497  
1498 -## **Critique and Observations**
1924 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1925 +
1499 1499  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1500 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1501 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1927 + - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1928 + - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
1502 1502  
1503 1503  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1504 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1505 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1931 + - Lacks **qualitative analysis of user motivations**.
1932 + - Focuses on **Western social media platforms**, missing global perspectives.
1506 1506  
1507 1507  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1508 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1509 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1935 + - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1936 + - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1510 1510  
1511 ----
1938 +-----
1512 1512  
1513 1513  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1514 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1515 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1516 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1941 +- Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
1942 +- Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1943 +- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
1517 1517  
1518 ----
1945 +-----
1519 1519  
1520 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1521 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1522 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1523 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1947 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1524 1524  
1525 ----
1949 +1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
1950 +2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1951 +3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1526 1526  
1953 +-----
1954 +
1527 1527  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1528 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1956 +This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
1529 1529  
1530 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1958 +-----
1531 1531  
1532 ----
1533 -
1534 1534  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1535 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1536 -
1961 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
1537 1537  {{/expand}}
1538 1538  
1539 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1540 1540  
1965 +== Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions ==
1541 1541  
1542 -{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1543 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1544 -**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1545 -**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1546 -**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1547 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1548 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1967 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
1968 +**Source:** *Politics & Policy*
1969 +**Date of Publication:** *2007*
1970 +**Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
1971 +**Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
1972 +**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
1973 +**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
1549 1549  
1550 ----
1975 +-----
1551 1551  
1552 -## **Key Statistics**
1977 +## **Key Statistics**##
1978 +
1553 1553  1. **General Observations:**
1554 - - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1555 - - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1980 + - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
1981 + - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
1556 1556  
1557 1557  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1558 - - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1559 - - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1984 + - **Equality-based framing decreases opposition** to same-sex marriage.
1985 + - **Morality-based framing increases opposition** to same-sex marriage.
1560 1560  
1561 1561  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1562 - - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1563 - - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1988 + - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
1989 + - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
1564 1564  
1565 ----
1991 +-----
1566 1566  
1567 -## **Findings**
1993 +## **Findings**##
1994 +
1568 1568  1. **Primary Observations:**
1569 - - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1570 - - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1996 + - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
1997 + - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
1571 1571  
1572 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1573 - - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1574 - - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1999 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
2000 + - **Religious and conservative audiences** respond more to morality-based framing.
2001 + - **Younger and progressive audiences** respond more to equality-based framing.
1575 1575  
1576 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1577 - - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1578 - - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
2003 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
2004 + - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
2005 + - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
1579 1579  
1580 ----
2007 +-----
1581 1581  
1582 -## **Critique and Observations**
1583 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1584 - - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1585 - - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
2009 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1586 1586  
1587 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1588 - - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1589 - - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
2011 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2012 + - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
2013 + - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
1590 1590  
1591 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1592 - - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1593 - - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
2015 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
2016 + - Focuses **only on U.S. media coverage**, limiting global applicability.
2017 + - Does not account for **social media's growing influence** on public opinion.
1594 1594  
1595 ----
2019 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
2020 + - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
2021 + - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
1596 1596  
2023 +-----
2024 +
1597 1597  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1598 -- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1599 -- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1600 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
2026 +- Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
2027 +- Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
2028 +- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
1601 1601  
1602 ----
2030 +-----
1603 1603  
1604 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1605 -1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1606 -2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1607 -3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
2032 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1608 1608  
1609 ----
2034 +1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
2035 +2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
2036 +3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
1610 1610  
2038 +-----
2039 +
1611 1611  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1612 -This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
2041 +This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
1613 1613  
1614 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
2043 +-----
1615 1615  
1616 ----
1617 -
1618 1618  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1619 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1620 -
2046 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
1621 1621  {{/expand}}
1622 1622  
1623 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1624 1624  
1625 -{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1626 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1627 -**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1628 -**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1629 -**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1630 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1631 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
2050 +== Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion ==
1632 1632  
1633 ----
2052 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
2053 +**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
2054 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
2055 +**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
2056 +**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
2057 +**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2058 +**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
1634 1634  
1635 -## **Key Statistics**
1636 -1. **General Observations:**
1637 - - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1638 - - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
2060 +-----
1639 1639  
1640 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1641 - - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1642 - - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
2062 +## **Key Statistics**##
1643 1643  
1644 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1645 - - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1646 - - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1647 -
1648 ----
1649 -
1650 -## **Findings**
1651 -1. **Primary Observations:**
1652 - - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1653 - - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1654 -
1655 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1656 - - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1657 - - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1658 -
1659 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1660 - - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1661 - - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1662 -
1663 ----
1664 -
1665 -## **Critique and Observations**
1666 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1667 - - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1668 - - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1669 -
1670 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1671 - - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1672 - - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1673 -
1674 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1675 - - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1676 - - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1677 -
1678 ----
1679 -
1680 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1681 -- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1682 -- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1683 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1684 -
1685 ----
1686 -
1687 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1688 -1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1689 -2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1690 -3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1691 -
1692 ----
1693 -
1694 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1695 -This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1696 -
1697 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1698 -
1699 ----
1700 -
1701 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1702 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1703 -
1704 -{{/expand}}
1705 -
1706 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1707 -
1708 -{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1709 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1710 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1711 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1712 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1713 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1714 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1715 -
1716 ----
1717 -
1718 -## **Key Statistics**
1719 1719  1. **General Observations:**
1720 - - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1721 - - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
2065 + - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
2066 + - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
1722 1722  
1723 1723  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1724 - - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1725 - - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
2069 + - **Video-based content was 2x more persuasive** than text-based content.
2070 + - Participants **under age 35 were more susceptible to political messaging shifts**.
1726 1726  
1727 1727  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1728 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1729 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
2073 + - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
2074 + - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
1730 1730  
1731 ----
2076 +-----
1732 1732  
1733 -## **Findings**
2078 +## **Findings**##
2079 +
1734 1734  1. **Primary Observations:**
1735 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1736 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
2081 + - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
2082 + - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
1737 1737  
1738 1738  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1739 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1740 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
2085 + - **Social media platforms had stronger persuasive effects** than news websites.
2086 + - Participants who engaged in **online discussions retained more political knowledge**.
1741 1741  
1742 1742  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1743 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1744 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
2089 + - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
2090 + - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
1745 1745  
1746 ----
2092 +-----
1747 1747  
1748 -## **Critique and Observations**
2094 +## **Critique and Observations**##
2095 +
1749 1749  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1750 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1751 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
2097 + - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
2098 + - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
1752 1752  
1753 1753  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1754 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1755 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
2101 + - Limited to **short-term persuasion effects**, without long-term follow-up.
2102 + - Does not explore **the role of misinformation in political persuasion**.
1756 1756  
1757 1757  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1758 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1759 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
2105 + - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
2106 + - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
1760 1760  
1761 ----
2108 +-----
1762 1762  
1763 1763  ## **Relevance to Subproject**
1764 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1765 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1766 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
2111 +- Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
2112 +- Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
2113 +- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
1767 1767  
1768 ----
2115 +-----
1769 1769  
1770 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1771 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1772 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1773 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
2117 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1774 1774  
1775 ----
2119 +1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
2120 +2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
2121 +3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
1776 1776  
2123 +-----
2124 +
1777 1777  ## **Summary of Research Study**
1778 -This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
2126 +This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
1779 1779  
1780 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
2128 +-----
1781 1781  
1782 ----
1783 -
1784 1784  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
1785 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1786 -
2131 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
1787 1787  {{/expand}}
1788 1788  
1789 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1790 1790  
2135 +