0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 71.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 05:06
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 94.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/04/16 00:43
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,554 +1,619 @@
1 1  = Research at a Glance =
2 2  
3 -== Introduction ==
4 4  
5 -Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various fields such as **social psychology, public policy, behavioral economics, and more**. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout.
6 6  
7 -=== How to Use This Repository ===
5 + Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various important Racial themes. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout. I wanted to make this for a couple of reasons. Number one is organization. There are a ton of useful studies out there that expose the truth, sometimes inadvertently. You'll notice that in this initial draft the summaries are often woke and reflect the bias of the AI writing them as well as the researchers politically correct conclusion in most cases. That's because I haven't gotten to going through and pointing out the reasons I put all of them in here.
8 8  
9 -- Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
10 -- Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
11 -- Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
12 -- If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
13 13  
14 -{{toc/}}
8 + There is often an underlying hypocrisy or double standard, saying the quiet part out loud, or conclusions that are so much of an antithesis to what the data shows that made me want to include it. At least, thats the idea for once its polished. I have about 150 more studies to upload, so it will be a few weeks before I get through it all. Until such time, feel free to search for them yourself and edit in what you find, or add your own studies. If you like you can do it manually, or if you'd rather go the route I did, just rename the study to its doi number and feed the study into an AI and tell them to summarize the study using the following format:
15 15  
16 -== Research Studies Repository ==
10 +{{example}}
11 +~= Study: [Study Title] =
17 17  
13 +~{~{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
14 +~*~*Source:~*~* *[Journal/Institution Name]*
15 +~*~*Date of Publication:~*~* *[Publication Date]*
16 +~*~*Author(s):~*~* *[Author(s) Name(s)]*
17 +~*~*Title:~*~* *"[Study Title]"*
18 +~*~*DOI:~*~* [DOI or Link]
19 +~*~*Subject Matter:~*~* *[Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]* 
18 18  
19 -= Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding =
20 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
21 -**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
22 -**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
23 -**Author(s):** Smith et al.
24 -**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
25 -**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
26 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
21 +~-~--
27 27  
28 -**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
29 -
30 -=== **Key Statistics** ===
31 -
32 -1. **General Observations:**
33 - - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
34 - - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
35 -
36 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
37 - - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
38 - - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
39 -
40 -=== **Findings** ===
41 -
42 -- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
43 -- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
44 -
45 -=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
46 -
47 -- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
48 -- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
49 -{{/expand}}
50 -
51 -{{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
52 -**Source:** [Journal/Institution Name]
53 -**Date of Publication:** [Publication Date]
54 -**Author(s):** [Author(s) Name(s)]
55 -**Title:** "[Study Title]"
56 -**DOI:** [DOI or Link]
57 -**Subject Matter:** [Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]
58 -
59 ----
60 -
61 -## **Key Statistics**
62 -1. **General Observations:**
23 +~#~# ~*~*Key Statistics~*~*
24 +~1. ~*~*General Observations:~*~*
63 63   - [Statistical finding or observation]
64 64   - [Statistical finding or observation]
65 65  
66 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
28 +2. ~*~*Subgroup Analysis:~*~*
67 67   - [Breakdown of findings by gender, race, or other subgroups]
68 68  
69 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
31 +3. ~*~*Other Significant Data Points:~*~*
70 70   - [Any additional findings or significant statistics]
71 71  
72 ----
34 +~-~--
73 73  
74 -## **Findings**
75 -1. **Primary Observations:**
36 +~#~# ~*~*Findings~*~*
37 +~1. ~*~*Primary Observations:~*~*
76 76   - [High-level findings or trends in the study]
77 77  
78 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
40 +2. ~*~*Subgroup Trends:~*~*
79 79   - [Disparities or differences highlighted in the study]
80 80  
81 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
43 +3. ~*~*Specific Case Analysis:~*~*
82 82   - [Detailed explanation of any notable specific findings]
83 83  
84 ----
46 +~-~--
85 85  
86 -## **Critique and Observations**
87 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
48 +~#~# ~*~*Critique and Observations~*~*
49 +~1. ~*~*Strengths of the Study:~*~*
88 88   - [Examples: strong methodology, large dataset, etc.]
89 89  
90 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
52 +2. ~*~*Limitations of the Study:~*~*
91 91   - [Examples: data gaps, lack of upstream analysis, etc.]
92 92  
93 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
55 +3. ~*~*Suggestions for Improvement:~*~*
94 94   - [Ideas for further research or addressing limitations]
95 95  
96 ----
58 +~-~--
97 97  
98 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
60 +~#~# ~*~*Relevance to Subproject~*~*
99 99  - [Explanation of how this study contributes to your subproject goals.]
100 100  - [Any key arguments or findings that support or challenge your views.]
101 101  
102 ----
64 +~-~--
103 103  
104 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
105 -1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
66 +~#~# ~*~*Suggestions for Further Exploration~*~*
67 +~1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
106 106  2. [Potential studies or sources to complement this analysis.]
107 107  
108 ----
70 +~-~--
109 109  
110 -## **Summary of Research Study**
111 -This study examines **[core research question or focus]**, providing insights into **[main subject area]**. The research utilized **[sample size and methodology]** to assess **[key variables or measured outcomes]**.
72 +~#~# ~*~*Summary of Research Study~*~*
73 +This study examines ~*~*[core research question or focus]~*~*, providing insights into ~*~*[main subject area]~*~*. The research utilized ~*~*[sample size and methodology]~*~* to assess ~*~*[key variables or measured outcomes]~*~*. 
112 112  
113 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
75 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studys contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
114 114  
115 ----
77 +~-~--
116 116  
117 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
118 -{{velocity}}
119 -#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
120 -#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
121 -#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
122 -[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
123 -#else
124 -{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
125 -#end
126 -{{/velocity}}
79 +~#~# ~*~*📄 Download Full Study~*~*
80 +~{~{velocity}}
81 +#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
82 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
83 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach~:$filename"))
84 +~[~[Download Full Study>>attach~:$filename]]
85 +#else
86 +~{~{html}}<span style="color:red; font-weight:bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>~{~{/html}}
87 +#end
88 +~{~{/velocity}}
127 127  
128 -{{/expand}}
90 +~{~{/expand}}
129 129  
130 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
92 +
93 +{{/example}}
131 131  
132 132  
133 133  
134 ----
97 +- Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
98 +- Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
99 +- Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
100 +- If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
101 +- You'll also find a download link to the original full study in pdf form at the bottom of the collapsible block.
135 135  
136 -{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}}
137 -**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
138 -**Date of Publication:** *2020*
139 -**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
140 -**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
141 -**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
142 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*
143 143  
144 ----
104 +{{toc/}}
145 145  
146 -## **Key Statistics**
106 +
107 +
108 +
109 +
110 += Genetics =
111 +
112 +
113 +{{expandable summary="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
114 +**Source:** *Nature*
115 +**Date of Publication:** *2009*
116 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
117 +**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
118 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
119 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
120 +
121 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
147 147  1. **General Observations:**
148 - - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
149 - - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
123 + - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
124 + - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
150 150  
151 151  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
152 - - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
153 - - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
127 + - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
128 + - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
154 154  
155 155  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
156 - - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
157 - - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
131 + - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
132 + - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
133 +{{/expandable}}
158 158  
159 ----
160 -
161 -## **Findings**
135 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
162 162  1. **Primary Observations:**
163 - - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
164 - - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
137 + - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
138 + - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
165 165  
166 166  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
167 - - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
168 - - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
141 + - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
142 + - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
169 169  
170 170  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
171 - - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
172 - - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
145 + - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
146 + - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
147 +{{/expandable}}
173 173  
174 ----
175 -
176 -## **Critique and Observations**
149 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
177 177  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
178 - - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
179 - - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
151 + - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
152 + - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
180 180  
181 181  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
182 - - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
183 - - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
155 + - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
156 + - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
184 184  
185 185  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
186 - - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
187 - - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
159 + - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
160 + - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
161 +{{/expandable}}
188 188  
189 ----
163 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
164 +- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
165 +- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
166 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
167 +{{/expandable}}
190 190  
191 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
192 -- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
193 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
169 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
170 +1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
171 +2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
172 +3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
173 +{{/expandable}}
194 194  
195 ----
175 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
176 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
177 +##
178 + ##
179 +{{/expandable}}
180 +{{/expandable}}
196 196  
197 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
198 -1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
199 -2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
182 +{{expandable summary="
200 200  
201 ----
202 202  
203 -## **Summary of Research Study**
204 -This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.
185 +Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
186 +**Source:** *Nature*
187 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
188 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
189 +**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
190 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
191 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
205 205  
206 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
193 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
194 +1. **General Observations:**
195 + - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
196 + - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
207 207  
208 ----
198 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
199 + - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
200 + - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
209 209  
210 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
211 -{{velocity}}
212 -#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
213 -#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
214 -#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
215 -[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
216 -#else
217 -{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
218 -#end
219 -{{/velocity}}
202 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
203 + - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
204 + - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
205 +{{/expandable}}
220 220  
221 -{{/expand}}
207 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
208 +1. **Primary Observations:**
209 + - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
210 + - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
222 222  
223 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
212 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
213 + - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
214 + - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
224 224  
216 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
217 + - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
218 + - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
219 +{{/expandable}}
225 225  
226 -{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}}
227 -**Source:** *Current Psychology*
228 -**Date of Publication:** *2024*
229 -**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
230 -**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
231 -**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
232 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
221 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
222 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
223 + - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
224 + - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
233 233  
234 ----
226 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
227 + - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
228 + - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
235 235  
236 -## **Key Statistics**
230 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
231 + - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
232 + - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
233 +{{/expandable}}
234 +
235 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
236 +- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
237 +- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
238 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
239 +{{/expandable}}
240 +
241 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
242 +1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
243 +2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
244 +3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
245 +{{/expandable}}
246 +
247 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
248 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
249 +##
250 + ##
251 +{{/expandable}}
252 +{{/expandable}}
253 +
254 +{{expandable summary="
255 +
256 +
257 +Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
258 +**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
259 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
260 +**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
261 +**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
262 +**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
263 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
264 +
265 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
237 237  1. **General Observations:**
238 - - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
239 - - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
267 + - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
268 + - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
240 240  
241 241  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
242 - - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
243 - - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
271 + - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
272 + - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
244 244  
245 245  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
246 - - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
247 - - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
275 + - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
276 + - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
277 +{{/expandable}}
248 248  
249 ----
250 -
251 -## **Findings**
279 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
252 252  1. **Primary Observations:**
253 - - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
254 - - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
281 + - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
282 + - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
255 255  
256 256  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
257 - - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
258 - - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
285 + - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (70-80%)**.
286 + - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
259 259  
260 260  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
261 - - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
262 - - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
289 + - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
290 + - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
291 +{{/expandable}}
263 263  
264 ----
265 -
266 -## **Critique and Observations**
293 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
267 267  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
268 - - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
269 - - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
295 + - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
296 + - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
270 270  
271 271  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
272 - - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
273 - - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
299 + - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
300 + - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
274 274  
275 275  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
276 - - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
277 - - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
303 + - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
304 + - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
305 +{{/expandable}}
278 278  
279 ----
307 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
308 +- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
309 +- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
310 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
311 +{{/expandable}}
280 280  
281 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
282 -- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
283 -- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
284 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
313 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
314 +1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
315 +2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
316 +3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
317 +{{/expandable}}
285 285  
286 ----
319 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
320 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
321 +{{/expandable}}
322 +{{/expandable}}
287 287  
288 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
289 -1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
290 -2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
291 -3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
324 +{{expandable summary="
292 292  
293 ----
294 294  
295 -## **Summary of Research Study**
296 -This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.
327 +Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
328 +**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
329 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
330 +**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
331 +**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
332 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
333 +**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
297 297  
298 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
335 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
336 +1. **General Observations:**
337 + - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
338 + - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
299 299  
300 ----
340 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
341 + - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
342 + - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
301 301  
302 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
303 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
344 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
345 + - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
346 + - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
347 +{{/expandable}}
304 304  
305 -{{/expand}}
349 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
350 +1. **Primary Observations:**
351 + - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
352 + - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
306 306  
307 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
354 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
355 + - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
356 + - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
308 308  
309 -{{expand title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" expanded="false"}} Source: Addictive Behaviors
310 -Date of Publication: 2016
311 -Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
312 -Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
313 -DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
314 -Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
358 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
359 + - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
360 + - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
361 +{{/expandable}}
315 315  
316 -Key Statistics
317 -General Observations:
363 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
364 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
365 + - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
366 + - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
318 318  
319 -Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
320 -Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
321 -Subgroup Analysis:
368 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
369 + - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
370 + - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
322 322  
323 -Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
324 -Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
325 -Other Significant Data Points:
372 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
373 + - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
374 + - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
375 +{{/expandable}}
326 326  
327 -Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
328 -Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
329 -Findings
330 -Primary Observations:
377 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
378 +- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
379 +- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
380 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
381 +{{/expandable}}
331 331  
332 -Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
333 -Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
334 -Subgroup Trends:
383 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
384 +1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
385 +2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
386 +3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
387 +{{/expandable}}
335 335  
336 -Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
337 -College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
338 -Specific Case Analysis:
389 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
390 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
391 +{{/expandable}}
392 +{{/expandable}}
339 339  
340 -Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
341 -Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
342 -Critique and Observations
343 -Strengths of the Study:
394 +{{expandable summary="
344 344  
345 -Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
346 -Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
347 -Limitations of the Study:
348 348  
349 -Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
350 -Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
351 -Suggestions for Improvement:
397 +Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
398 +**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
399 +**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
400 +**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
401 +**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
402 +**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
403 +**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
352 352  
353 -Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
354 -Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
355 -Relevance to Subproject
356 -Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
357 -Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
358 -Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
359 -Suggestions for Further Exploration
360 -Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
361 -Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
362 -Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
363 -Summary of Research Study
364 -This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
365 -
366 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
367 -
368 -📄 Download Full Study
369 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
370 -
371 -{{/expand}}
372 -
373 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
374 -
375 -{{expand title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?" expanded="false"}}
376 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
377 -**Date of Publication:** *2014*
378 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
379 -**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
380 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
381 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
382 -
383 ----
384 -
385 -## **Key Statistics**
405 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
386 386  1. **General Observations:**
387 - - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
388 - - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
407 + - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
408 + - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
389 389  
390 390  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
391 - - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
392 - - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
411 + - Examines **West Eurasian populations** and their genetic evolution.
412 + - Tracks **changes in allele frequencies over millennia**.
393 393  
394 394  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
395 - - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
396 - - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
415 + - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
416 + - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
417 +{{/expandable}}
397 397  
398 ----
399 -
400 -## **Findings**
419 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
401 401  1. **Primary Observations:**
402 - - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
403 - - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
421 + - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
422 + - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
404 404  
405 405  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
406 - - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
407 - - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
425 + - Selection pressure on **energy storage genes** supports the **Thrifty Gene Hypothesis**.
426 + - **Cognitive performance-related alleles** have undergone selection, but their historical advantages remain unclear.
408 408  
409 409  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
410 - - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
411 - - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
429 + - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
430 + - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
431 + - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
432 +{{/expandable}}
412 412  
413 ----
414 -
415 -## **Critique and Observations**
434 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
416 416  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
417 - - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
418 - - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
436 + - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
437 + - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
419 419  
420 420  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
421 - - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
422 - - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
440 + - Findings **may not translate directly** to modern populations.
441 + - **Unclear whether observed selection pressures persist today**.
423 423  
424 424  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
425 - - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
426 - - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
444 + - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
445 + - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
446 +{{/expandable}}
427 427  
428 ----
448 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
449 +- Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
450 +- Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
451 +- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.
452 +{{/expandable}}
429 429  
430 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
431 -- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
432 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
433 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
454 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
455 +1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
456 +2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
457 +3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
458 +{{/expandable}}
434 434  
435 ----
460 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
461 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]
462 +{{/expandable}}
463 +{{/expandable}}
436 436  
437 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
438 -1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
439 -2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
440 -3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
465 +{{expandable summary="
441 441  
442 ----
443 443  
444 -## **Summary of Research Study**
445 -This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.
468 +Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
469 +**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
470 +**Date of Publication:** *2013*
471 +**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
472 +**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
473 +**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
474 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
446 446  
447 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
476 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
477 +1. **General Observations:**
478 + - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
479 + - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
448 448  
449 ----
481 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
482 + - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
483 + - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
450 450  
451 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
452 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
485 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
486 + - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
487 + - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
488 +{{/expandable}}
453 453  
454 -{{/expand}}
490 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
491 +1. **Primary Observations:**
492 + - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
493 + - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
455 455  
456 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
495 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
496 + - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
497 + - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
457 457  
458 -{{expand title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation" expanded="false"}}
459 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
460 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
461 -**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
462 -**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
463 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
464 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
499 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
500 + - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
501 + - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
502 +{{/expandable}}
465 465  
466 ----
504 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
505 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
506 + - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
507 + - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
467 467  
468 -## **Key Statistics**
509 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
510 + - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
511 + - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
512 +
513 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
514 + - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
515 + - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
516 +{{/expandable}}
517 +
518 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
519 +- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
520 +- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
521 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
522 +{{/expandable}}
523 +
524 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
525 +1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
526 +2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
527 +3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
528 +{{/expandable}}
529 +
530 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
531 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
532 +{{/expandable}}
533 +{{/expandable}}
534 +
535 +{{expandable summary="
536 +
537 +
538 +Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
539 +**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
540 +**Date of Publication:** *2010*
541 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
542 +**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
543 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
544 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
545 +
546 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
469 469  1. **General Observations:**
470 - - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
471 - - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
548 + - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
549 + - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
472 472  
473 473  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
474 - - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
475 - - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
552 + - Discusses **four primary definitions of race/subspecies**: Essentialist, Taxonomic, Population-based, and Lineage-based.
553 + - Suggests that **human heterozygosity levels are comparable to species that are classified as polytypic**.
476 476  
477 477  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
478 - - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
479 - - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
556 + - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
557 + - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
558 +{{/expandable}}
480 480  
481 ----
482 -
483 -## **Findings**
560 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
484 484  1. **Primary Observations:**
485 - - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
486 - - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
562 + - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
563 + - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
487 487  
488 488  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
489 - - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
490 - - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
566 + - Discusses **how race concepts evolved over time** in biological sciences.
567 + - Compares **human diversity with that of other primates** such as chimpanzees and gorillas.
491 491  
492 492  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
493 - - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
494 - - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
570 + - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
571 + - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
572 +{{/expandable}}
495 495  
496 ----
497 -
498 -## **Critique and Observations**
574 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
499 499  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
500 - - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
501 - - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
576 + - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
577 + - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
502 502  
503 503  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
504 - - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
505 - - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
580 + - Controversial topic with **strong opposing views in anthropology and genetics**.
581 + - **Relies on broad genetic trends**, but does not analyze individual-level genetic variation in depth.
506 506  
507 507  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
508 - - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
509 - - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
584 + - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
585 + - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
586 +{{/expandable}}
510 510  
511 ----
588 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
589 +- Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
590 +- Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
591 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
592 +{{/expandable}}
512 512  
513 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
514 -- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
515 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
516 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
594 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
595 +1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
596 +2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
597 +3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
598 +{{/expandable}}
517 517  
518 ----
600 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
601 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
602 +{{/expandable}}
603 +{{/expandable}}
519 519  
520 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
521 -1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
522 -2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
523 -3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
605 +{{expandable summary="
524 524  
525 ----
526 526  
527 -## **Summary of Research Study**
528 -This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.
529 -
530 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
531 -
532 ----
533 -
534 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
535 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
536 -
537 -{{/expand}}
538 -
539 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
540 -
541 -{{expand title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media" expanded="false"}}
608 +Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
542 542  **Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
543 543  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
544 544  **Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
545 545  **Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
546 546  **DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
547 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
614 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
548 548  
549 ----
550 -
551 -## **Key Statistics**
616 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
552 552  1. **General Observations:**
553 553   - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
554 554   - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
... ... @@ -560,10 +560,9 @@
560 560  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
561 561   - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
562 562   - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
628 +{{/expandable}}
563 563  
564 ----
565 -
566 -## **Findings**
630 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
567 567  1. **Primary Observations:**
568 568   - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
569 569   - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
... ... @@ -575,10 +575,9 @@
575 575  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
576 576   - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
577 577   - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
642 +{{/expandable}}
578 578  
579 ----
580 -
581 -## **Critique and Observations**
644 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
582 582  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
583 583   - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
584 584   - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
... ... @@ -590,632 +590,693 @@
590 590  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
591 591   - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
592 592   - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
656 +{{/expandable}}
593 593  
594 ----
595 -
596 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
658 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
597 597  - Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
598 598  - Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
599 599  - Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
662 +{{/expandable}}
600 600  
601 ----
602 -
603 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
664 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
604 604  1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
605 605  2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
606 606  3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
668 +{{/expandable}}
607 607  
608 ----
609 -
610 -## **Summary of Research Study**
611 -This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.
612 -
613 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
614 -
615 ----
616 -
617 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
670 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
618 618  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
672 +{{/expandable}}
673 +{{/expandable}}
619 619  
620 -{{/expand}}
675 +{{expandable summary="
621 621  
622 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
623 623  
624 -{{expand title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications" expanded="false"}}
625 -**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
626 -**Date of Publication:** *2010*
627 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
628 -**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
629 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
630 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
678 +Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
679 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
680 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
681 +**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
682 +**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
683 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
684 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
631 631  
632 ----
633 -
634 -## **Key Statistics**
686 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
635 635  1. **General Observations:**
636 - - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
637 - - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
688 + - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
689 + - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
638 638  
639 639  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
640 - - Discusses **four primary definitions of race/subspecies**: Essentialist, Taxonomic, Population-based, and Lineage-based.
641 - - Suggests that **human heterozygosity levels are comparable to species that are classified as polytypic**.
692 + - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
693 + - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
642 642  
643 643  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
644 - - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
645 - - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
696 + - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
697 + - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
698 +{{/expandable}}
646 646  
647 ----
648 -
649 -## **Findings**
700 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
650 650  1. **Primary Observations:**
651 - - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
652 - - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
702 + - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
703 + - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
653 653  
654 654  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
655 - - Discusses **how race concepts evolved over time** in biological sciences.
656 - - Compares **human diversity with that of other primates** such as chimpanzees and gorillas.
706 + - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
707 + - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
657 657  
658 658  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
659 - - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
660 - - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
710 + - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
711 + - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
712 +{{/expandable}}
661 661  
662 ----
663 -
664 -## **Critique and Observations**
714 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
665 665  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
666 - - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
667 - - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
716 + - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
717 + - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
668 668  
669 669  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
670 - - Controversial topic with **strong opposing views in anthropology and genetics**.
671 - - **Relies on broad genetic trends**, but does not analyze individual-level genetic variation in depth.
720 + - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
721 + - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
672 672  
673 673  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
674 - - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
675 - - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
724 + - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
725 + - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
726 +{{/expandable}}
676 676  
677 ----
728 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
729 +- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
730 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
731 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
732 +{{/expandable}}
678 678  
679 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
680 -- Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
681 -- Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
682 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
734 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
735 +1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
736 +2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
737 +3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
738 +{{/expandable}}
683 683  
684 ----
740 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
741 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
742 +{{/expandable}}
743 +{{/expandable}}
685 685  
686 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
687 -1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
688 -2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
689 -3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
745 +{{expandable summary="
690 690  
691 ----
692 692  
693 -## **Summary of Research Study**
694 -This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.
748 +Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding"}}
749 +**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
750 +**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
751 +**Author(s):** Smith et al.
752 +**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
753 +**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
754 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science 
755 +{{/expandable}}
695 695  
696 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
757 +{{expandable summary="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
758 +**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
759 +**Date of Publication:** *2020*
760 +**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
761 +**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
762 +**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
763 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
697 697  
698 ----
699 -
700 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
701 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
702 -
703 -{{/expand}}
704 -
705 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
706 -
707 -{{expand title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age" expanded="false"}}
708 -**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
709 -**Date of Publication:** *2013*
710 -**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
711 -**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
712 -**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
713 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
714 -
715 ----
716 -
717 -## **Key Statistics**
765 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
718 718  1. **General Observations:**
719 - - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
720 - - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
767 + - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
768 + - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
721 721  
722 722  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
723 - - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
724 - - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
771 + - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
772 + - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
725 725  
726 726  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
727 - - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
728 - - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
775 + - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
776 + - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
777 +{{/expandable}}
729 729  
730 ----
731 -
732 -## **Findings**
779 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
733 733  1. **Primary Observations:**
734 - - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
735 - - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
781 + - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
782 + - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
736 736  
737 737  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
738 - - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
739 - - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
785 + - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
786 + - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
740 740  
741 741  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
742 - - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
743 - - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
789 + - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
790 + - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
791 +{{/expandable}}
744 744  
745 ----
746 -
747 -## **Critique and Observations**
793 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
748 748  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
749 - - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
750 - - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
795 + - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
796 + - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
751 751  
752 752  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
753 - - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
754 - - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
799 + - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
800 + - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
755 755  
756 756  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
757 - - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
758 - - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
803 + - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
804 + - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
805 +{{/expandable}}
759 759  
760 ----
807 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
808 +- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
809 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
810 +{{/expandable}}
761 761  
762 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
763 -- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
764 -- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
765 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
812 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
813 +1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
814 +2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
815 +{{/expandable}}
766 766  
767 ----
817 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
818 +{{velocity}}
819 +
820 +#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
821 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
822 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
823 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
824 +#else
825 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
826 +#end
827 +{{/velocity}}
828 +{{/expandable}}
829 +{{/expandable}}
768 768  
769 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
770 -1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
771 -2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
772 -3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
831 +{{expandable summary="
773 773  
774 ----
775 775  
776 -## **Summary of Research Study**
777 -This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.
834 +Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
835 +**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
836 +**Date of Publication:** *2012*
837 +**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
838 +**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
839 +**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
840 +**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
778 778  
779 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
842 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
843 +1. **General Observations:**
844 + - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
845 + - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
780 780  
781 ----
847 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
848 + - **Maternal race had a stronger influence than paternal race** on birth outcomes.
849 + - **Black mother–White father (BMWF) couples** had a higher risk than **White mother–Black father (WMBF) couples**.
782 782  
783 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
784 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
851 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
852 + - **Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for key outcomes:**
853 + - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
854 + - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
855 + - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
856 +{{/expandable}}
785 785  
786 -{{/expand}}
858 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
859 +1. **Primary Observations:**
860 + - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
861 + - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
787 787  
788 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
863 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
864 + - **Black mothers (regardless of paternal race) had the highest risk of LBW and PTB**.
865 + - **White mothers with Black fathers had a lower risk** than Black mothers with White fathers.
789 789  
790 -{{expand title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports" expanded="false"}}
791 -**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
792 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
793 -**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
794 -**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
795 -**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
796 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
867 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
868 + - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
869 + - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
870 +{{/expandable}}
797 797  
798 ----
872 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
873 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
874 + - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
875 + - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
799 799  
800 -## **Key Statistics**
877 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
878 + - Data limited to **Black-White biracial couples**, excluding other racial groups.
879 + - **Socioeconomic and healthcare access factors** not fully explored.
880 +
881 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
882 + - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
883 + - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
884 +{{/expandable}}
885 +
886 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
887 +- Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
888 +- Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
889 +- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.
890 +{{/expandable}}
891 +
892 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
893 +1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
894 +2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
895 +3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
896 +{{/expandable}}
897 +
898 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
899 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]
900 +{{/expandable}}
901 +{{/expandable}}
902 +
903 +{{expandable summary="
904 +
905 +
906 +Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
907 +**Source:** *Current Psychology*
908 +**Date of Publication:** *2024*
909 +**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
910 +**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
911 +**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
912 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
913 +
914 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
801 801  1. **General Observations:**
802 - - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
803 - - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
916 + - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
917 + - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
804 804  
805 805  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
806 - - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
807 - - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
920 + - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
921 + - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
808 808  
809 809  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
810 - - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
811 - - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
924 + - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
925 + - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
926 +{{/expandable}}
812 812  
813 ----
814 -
815 -## **Findings**
928 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
816 816  1. **Primary Observations:**
817 - - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
818 - - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
930 + - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
931 + - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
819 819  
820 820  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
821 - - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
822 - - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
934 + - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
935 + - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
823 823  
824 824  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
825 - - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
826 - - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
938 + - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
939 + - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
940 +{{/expandable}}
827 827  
828 ----
829 -
830 -## **Critique and Observations**
942 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
831 831  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
832 - - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
833 - - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
944 + - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
945 + - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
834 834  
835 835  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
836 - - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
837 - - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
948 + - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
949 + - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
838 838  
839 839  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
840 - - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
841 - - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
952 + - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
953 + - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
954 +{{/expandable}}
842 842  
843 ----
956 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
957 +- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
958 +- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
959 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
960 +{{/expandable}}
844 844  
845 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
846 -- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
847 -- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
848 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
962 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
963 +1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
964 +2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
965 +3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
966 +{{/expandable}}
849 849  
850 ----
968 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
969 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
970 +{{/expandable}}
851 851  
852 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
853 -1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
854 -2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
855 -3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
972 += Crime and Substance Abuse =
973 +{{/expandable}}
856 856  
857 ----
975 +{{expandable summary="
858 858  
859 -## **Summary of Research Study**
860 -This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.
861 861  
862 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
978 +Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
979 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
980 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
981 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
982 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
983 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
984 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
863 863  
864 ----
865 -
866 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
867 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
868 -
869 -{{/expand}}
870 -
871 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
872 -
873 -{{expand title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History" expanded="false"}}
874 -**Source:** *Nature*
875 -**Date of Publication:** *2009*
876 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
877 -**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
878 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
879 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*
880 -
881 ----
882 -
883 -## **Key Statistics**
986 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
884 884  1. **General Observations:**
885 - - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
886 - - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
988 + - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
989 + - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
887 887  
888 888  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
889 - - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
890 - - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
992 + - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
993 + - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
891 891  
892 892  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
893 - - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
894 - - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
996 + - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
997 + - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
998 +{{/expandable}}
895 895  
896 ----
897 -
898 -## **Findings**
1000 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
899 899  1. **Primary Observations:**
900 - - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
901 - - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
1002 + - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1003 + - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
902 902  
903 903  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
904 - - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
905 - - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
1006 + - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1007 + - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
906 906  
907 907  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
908 - - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
909 - - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
1010 + - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1011 + - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1012 +{{/expandable}}
910 910  
911 ----
912 -
913 -## **Critique and Observations**
1014 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
914 914  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
915 - - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
916 - - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
1016 + - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1017 + - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
917 917  
918 918  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
919 - - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
920 - - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
1020 + - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1021 + - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
921 921  
922 922  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
923 - - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
924 - - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
1024 + - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1025 + - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1026 +{{/expandable}}
925 925  
926 ----
1028 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1029 +- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1030 +- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1031 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1032 +{{/expandable}}
927 927  
928 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
929 -- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
930 -- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
931 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
1034 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1035 +1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1036 +2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1037 +3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1038 +{{/expandable}}
932 932  
933 ----
1040 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1041 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1042 +{{/expandable}}
1043 +{{/expandable}}
934 934  
935 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
936 -1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
937 -2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
938 -3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
1045 +{{expandable summary="
939 939  
940 ----
941 941  
942 -## **Summary of Research Study**
943 -This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.
1048 +Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1049 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1050 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1051 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1052 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1053 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1054 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
944 944  
945 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1056 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1057 +1. **General Observations:**
1058 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1059 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
946 946  
947 ----
1061 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1062 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1063 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
948 948  
949 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
950 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
1065 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1066 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1067 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1068 +{{/expandable}}
951 951  
952 -{{/expand}}
1070 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1071 +1. **Primary Observations:**
1072 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1073 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
953 953  
954 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1075 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1076 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1077 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
955 955  
1079 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1080 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1081 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1082 +{{/expandable}}
956 956  
957 -{{expand title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations" expanded="false"}}
958 -**Source:** *Nature*
959 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
960 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
961 -**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
962 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
963 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
1084 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1085 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1086 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1087 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
964 964  
965 ----
1089 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1090 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1091 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
966 966  
967 -## **Key Statistics**
1093 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1094 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1095 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1096 +{{/expandable}}
1097 +
1098 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1099 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1100 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1101 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1102 +{{/expandable}}
1103 +
1104 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1105 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1106 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1107 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1108 +{{/expandable}}
1109 +
1110 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1111 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1112 +{{/expandable}}
1113 +{{/expandable}}
1114 +
1115 +{{expandable summary="
1116 +
1117 +
1118 +Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1119 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1120 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1121 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1122 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1123 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1124 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1125 +
1126 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
968 968  1. **General Observations:**
969 - - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
970 - - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
1128 + - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1129 + - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
971 971  
972 972  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
973 - - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
974 - - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
1132 + - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1133 + - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
975 975  
976 976  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
977 - - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
978 - - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
1136 + - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1137 + - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1138 +{{/expandable}}
979 979  
980 ----
981 -
982 -## **Findings**
1140 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
983 983  1. **Primary Observations:**
984 - - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
985 - - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
1142 + - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1143 + - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
986 986  
987 987  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
988 - - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
989 - - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
1146 + - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1147 + - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
990 990  
991 991  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
992 - - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
993 - - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
1150 + - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1151 + - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1152 +{{/expandable}}
994 994  
995 ----
996 -
997 -## **Critique and Observations**
1154 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
998 998  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
999 - - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
1000 - - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
1156 + - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1157 + - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1001 1001  
1002 1002  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1003 - - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
1004 - - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
1160 + - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1161 + - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1005 1005  
1006 1006  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1007 - - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
1008 - - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
1164 + - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1165 + - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1166 +{{/expandable}}
1009 1009  
1010 ----
1168 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1169 +- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1170 +- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1171 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1172 +{{/expandable}}
1011 1011  
1012 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1013 -- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
1014 -- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
1015 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
1174 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1175 +1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1176 +2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1177 +3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1178 +{{/expandable}}
1016 1016  
1017 ----
1180 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1181 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1182 +{{/expandable}}
1183 +{{/expandable}}
1018 1018  
1019 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1020 -1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
1021 -2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
1022 -3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
1185 +{{expandable summary="
1023 1023  
1024 ----
1025 1025  
1026 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1027 -This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.
1188 +Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1189 +
1190 +{{/expandable}}
1028 1028  
1029 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1192 +{{expandable summary="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1193 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1194 +**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1195 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1196 +**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1197 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1198 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1030 1030  
1031 ----
1032 -
1033 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1034 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
1035 -
1036 -{{/expand}}
1037 -
1038 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1039 -
1040 -{{expand title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies" expanded="false"}}
1041 -**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
1042 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1043 -**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
1044 -**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
1045 -**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
1046 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
1047 -
1048 ----
1049 -
1050 -## **Key Statistics**
1200 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1051 1051  1. **General Observations:**
1052 - - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
1053 - - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
1202 + - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1203 + - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
1054 1054  
1055 1055  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1056 - - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
1057 - - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
1206 + - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
1207 + - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
1058 1058  
1059 1059  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1060 - - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
1061 - - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
1210 + - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1211 + - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1212 +{{/expandable}}
1062 1062  
1063 ----
1064 -
1065 -## **Findings**
1214 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1066 1066  1. **Primary Observations:**
1067 - - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
1068 - - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
1216 + - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1217 + - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
1069 1069  
1070 1070  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1071 - - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (~70-80%)**.
1072 - - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
1220 + - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
1221 + - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
1073 1073  
1074 1074  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1075 - - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
1076 - - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
1224 + - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1225 + - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1226 +{{/expandable}}
1077 1077  
1078 ----
1079 -
1080 -## **Critique and Observations**
1228 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1081 1081  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1082 - - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
1083 - - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
1230 + - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1231 + - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
1084 1084  
1085 1085  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1086 - - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
1087 - - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
1234 + - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
1235 + - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
1088 1088  
1089 1089  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1090 - - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
1091 - - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
1238 + - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1239 + - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1240 +{{/expandable}}
1092 1092  
1093 ----
1242 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1243 +- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1244 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1245 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
1246 +{{/expandable}}
1094 1094  
1095 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1096 -- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
1097 -- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
1098 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
1248 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1249 +1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1250 +2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1251 +3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1252 +{{/expandable}}
1099 1099  
1100 ----
1254 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1255 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
1256 +{{/expandable}}
1101 1101  
1102 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1103 -1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
1104 -2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
1105 -3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
1258 += Whiteness & White Guilt =
1259 +{{/expandable}}
1106 1106  
1107 ----
1261 +{{expandable summary="
1108 1108  
1109 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1110 -This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.
1111 1111  
1112 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1264 +Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1265 +**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1266 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1267 +**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1268 +**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1269 +**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1270 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1113 1113  
1114 ----
1115 -
1116 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1117 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
1118 -
1119 -{{/expand}}
1120 -
1121 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1122 -
1123 -{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}}
1124 -**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
1125 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1126 -**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
1127 -**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
1128 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
1129 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*
1130 -
1131 ----
1132 -
1133 -## **Key Statistics**
1272 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1134 1134  1. **General Observations:**
1135 - - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
1136 - - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
1274 + - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1275 + - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
1137 1137  
1138 1138  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1139 - - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
1140 - - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
1278 + - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
1279 + - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
1141 1141  
1142 1142  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1143 - - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
1144 - - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
1282 + - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1283 + - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1284 +{{/expandable}}
1145 1145  
1146 ----
1147 -
1148 -## **Findings**
1286 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1149 1149  1. **Primary Observations:**
1150 - - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
1151 - - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
1288 + - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1289 + - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
1152 1152  
1153 1153  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1154 - - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
1155 - - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
1292 + - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
1293 + - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
1156 1156  
1157 1157  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1158 - - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
1159 - - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
1296 + - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1297 + - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1298 +{{/expandable}}
1160 1160  
1161 ----
1162 -
1163 -## **Critique and Observations**
1300 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1164 1164  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1165 - - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
1166 - - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
1302 + - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1303 + - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
1167 1167  
1168 1168  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1169 - - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
1170 - - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
1306 + - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
1307 + - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
1171 1171  
1172 1172  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1173 - - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
1174 - - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
1310 + - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1311 + - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1312 +{{/expandable}}
1175 1175  
1176 ----
1314 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1315 +- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1316 +- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1317 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
1318 +{{/expandable}}
1177 1177  
1178 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1179 -- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
1180 -- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
1181 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
1320 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1321 +1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1322 +2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1323 +3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1324 +{{/expandable}}
1182 1182  
1183 ----
1326 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1327 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
1328 +{{/expandable}}
1329 +{{/expandable}}
1184 1184  
1185 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1186 -1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
1187 -2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
1188 -3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
1331 +{{expandable summary="
1189 1189  
1190 ----
1191 1191  
1192 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1193 -This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.
1194 -
1195 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1196 -
1197 ----
1198 -
1199 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1200 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
1201 -
1202 -{{/expand}}
1203 -
1204 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1205 -
1206 -
1207 -
1208 -{{expand title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations" expanded="false"}}
1334 +Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1209 1209  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1210 1210  **Date of Publication:** *2016*
1211 1211  **Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1212 1212  **Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1213 1213  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1214 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1340 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1215 1215  
1216 ----
1217 -
1218 -## **Key Statistics**
1342 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1219 1219  1. **General Observations:**
1220 1220   - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1221 1221   - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
... ... @@ -1227,10 +1227,9 @@
1227 1227  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1228 1228   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1229 1229   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1354 +{{/expandable}}
1230 1230  
1231 ----
1232 -
1233 -## **Findings**
1356 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1234 1234  1. **Primary Observations:**
1235 1235   - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1236 1236   - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
... ... @@ -1242,10 +1242,9 @@
1242 1242  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1243 1243   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1244 1244   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1368 +{{/expandable}}
1245 1245  
1246 ----
1247 -
1248 -## **Critique and Observations**
1370 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1249 1249  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1250 1250   - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1251 1251   - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
... ... @@ -1257,49 +1257,37 @@
1257 1257  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1258 1258   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1259 1259   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1382 +{{/expandable}}
1260 1260  
1261 ----
1262 -
1263 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1384 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1264 1264  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1265 1265  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1266 1266  - Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1388 +{{/expandable}}
1267 1267  
1268 ----
1269 -
1270 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1390 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1271 1271  1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1272 1272  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1273 1273  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1394 +{{/expandable}}
1274 1274  
1275 ----
1276 -
1277 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1278 -This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.
1279 -
1280 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1281 -
1282 ----
1283 -
1284 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1396 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1285 1285  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1398 +{{/expandable}}
1399 +{{/expandable}}
1286 1286  
1287 -{{/expand}}
1401 +{{expandable summary="
1288 1288  
1289 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1290 1290  
1291 -
1292 -{{expand title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans" expanded="false"}}
1404 +Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1293 1293  **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1294 1294  **Date of Publication:** *2015*
1295 1295  **Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1296 1296  **Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1297 1297  **DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1298 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1410 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1299 1299  
1300 ----
1301 -
1302 -## **Key Statistics**
1412 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1303 1303  1. **General Observations:**
1304 1304   - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1305 1305   - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
... ... @@ -1311,10 +1311,9 @@
1311 1311  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1312 1312   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1313 1313   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1424 +{{/expandable}}
1314 1314  
1315 ----
1316 -
1317 -## **Findings**
1426 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1318 1318  1. **Primary Observations:**
1319 1319   - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1320 1320   - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
... ... @@ -1326,10 +1326,9 @@
1326 1326  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1327 1327   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1328 1328   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1438 +{{/expandable}}
1329 1329  
1330 ----
1331 -
1332 -## **Critique and Observations**
1440 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1333 1333  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1334 1334   - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1335 1335   - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
... ... @@ -1341,48 +1341,37 @@
1341 1341  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1342 1342   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1343 1343   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1452 +{{/expandable}}
1344 1344  
1345 ----
1346 -
1347 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1454 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1348 1348  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1349 1349  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1350 1350  - Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1458 +{{/expandable}}
1351 1351  
1352 ----
1353 -
1354 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1460 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1355 1355  1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1356 1356  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1357 1357  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1464 +{{/expandable}}
1358 1358  
1359 ----
1360 -
1361 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1362 -This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.
1363 -
1364 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1365 -
1366 ----
1367 -
1368 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1466 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1369 1369  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1468 +{{/expandable}}
1469 +{{/expandable}}
1370 1370  
1371 -{{/expand}}
1471 +{{expandable summary="
1372 1372  
1373 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1374 1374  
1375 -{{expand title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?" expanded="false"}}
1474 +Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1376 1376  **Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1377 1377  **Date of Publication:** *2023*
1378 1378  **Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1379 1379  **Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1380 1380  **DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1381 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1480 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1382 1382  
1383 ----
1384 -
1385 -## **Key Statistics**
1482 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1386 1386  1. **General Observations:**
1387 1387   - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1388 1388   - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
... ... @@ -1394,10 +1394,9 @@
1394 1394  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1395 1395   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1396 1396   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1494 +{{/expandable}}
1397 1397  
1398 ----
1399 -
1400 -## **Findings**
1496 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1401 1401  1. **Primary Observations:**
1402 1402   - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1403 1403   - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
... ... @@ -1409,10 +1409,9 @@
1409 1409  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1410 1410   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1411 1411   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1508 +{{/expandable}}
1412 1412  
1413 ----
1414 -
1415 -## **Critique and Observations**
1510 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1416 1416  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1417 1417   - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1418 1418   - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
... ... @@ -1424,35 +1424,234 @@
1424 1424  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1425 1425   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1426 1426   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1522 +{{/expandable}}
1427 1427  
1428 ----
1429 -
1430 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1524 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1431 1431  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1432 1432  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1433 1433  - Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1528 +{{/expandable}}
1434 1434  
1435 ----
1436 -
1437 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1530 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1438 1438  1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1439 1439  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1440 1440  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1534 +{{/expandable}}
1441 1441  
1442 ----
1536 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1537 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1538 +{{/expandable}}
1443 1443  
1444 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1445 -This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.
1540 += Media =
1541 +{{/expandable}}
1446 1446  
1447 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1543 +{{expandable summary="
1448 1448  
1449 ----
1450 1450  
1451 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1452 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1546 +Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic"}}
1547 +**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1548 +**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1549 +**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1550 +**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1551 +**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1552 +**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1453 1453  
1454 -{{/expand}}
1554 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1555 +1. **General Observations:**
1556 + - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1557 + - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
1455 1455  
1456 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1559 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1560 + - **Anonymity and reduced social cues** in CMC increased hostility.
1561 + - **Echo chambers formed more frequently in algorithm-driven environments**.
1457 1457  
1563 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1564 + - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1565 + - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1566 +{{/expandable}}
1458 1458  
1568 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1569 +1. **Primary Observations:**
1570 + - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1571 + - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
1572 +
1573 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1574 + - Participants with **strong pre-existing biases became more polarized** after exposure to conflicting views.
1575 + - **Moderate users were more likely to disengage** from conflict-heavy discussions.
1576 +
1577 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1578 + - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1579 + - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1580 +{{/expandable}}
1581 +
1582 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1583 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1584 + - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1585 + - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
1586 +
1587 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1588 + - Lacks **qualitative analysis of user motivations**.
1589 + - Focuses on **Western social media platforms**, missing global perspectives.
1590 +
1591 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1592 + - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1593 + - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1594 +{{/expandable}}
1595 +
1596 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1597 +- Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
1598 +- Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1599 +- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
1600 +{{/expandable}}
1601 +
1602 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1603 +1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
1604 +2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1605 +3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1606 +{{/expandable}}
1607 +
1608 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1609 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
1610 +{{/expandable}}
1611 +{{/expandable}}
1612 +
1613 +{{expandable summary="
1614 +
1615 +
1616 +Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
1617 +**Source:** *Politics & Policy*
1618 +**Date of Publication:** *2007*
1619 +**Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
1620 +**Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
1621 +**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
1622 +**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
1623 +
1624 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1625 +1. **General Observations:**
1626 + - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
1627 + - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
1628 +
1629 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1630 + - **Equality-based framing decreases opposition** to same-sex marriage.
1631 + - **Morality-based framing increases opposition** to same-sex marriage.
1632 +
1633 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1634 + - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
1635 + - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
1636 +{{/expandable}}
1637 +
1638 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1639 +1. **Primary Observations:**
1640 + - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
1641 + - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
1642 +
1643 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1644 + - **Religious and conservative audiences** respond more to morality-based framing.
1645 + - **Younger and progressive audiences** respond more to equality-based framing.
1646 +
1647 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1648 + - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
1649 + - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
1650 +{{/expandable}}
1651 +
1652 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1653 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1654 + - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
1655 + - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
1656 +
1657 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1658 + - Focuses **only on U.S. media coverage**, limiting global applicability.
1659 + - Does not account for **social media's growing influence** on public opinion.
1660 +
1661 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1662 + - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
1663 + - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
1664 +{{/expandable}}
1665 +
1666 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1667 +- Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
1668 +- Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
1669 +- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.
1670 +{{/expandable}}
1671 +
1672 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1673 +1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
1674 +2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
1675 +3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
1676 +{{/expandable}}
1677 +
1678 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1679 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]
1680 +{{/expandable}}
1681 +{{/expandable}}
1682 +
1683 +{{expandable summary="
1684 +
1685 +
1686 +Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
1687 +**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
1688 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1689 +**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
1690 +**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
1691 +**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
1692 +**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
1693 +
1694 +{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1695 +1. **General Observations:**
1696 + - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
1697 + - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
1698 +
1699 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1700 + - **Video-based content was 2x more persuasive** than text-based content.
1701 + - Participants **under age 35 were more susceptible to political messaging shifts**.
1702 +
1703 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1704 + - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
1705 + - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
1706 +{{/expandable}}
1707 +
1708 +{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1709 +1. **Primary Observations:**
1710 + - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
1711 + - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
1712 +
1713 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1714 + - **Social media platforms had stronger persuasive effects** than news websites.
1715 + - Participants who engaged in **online discussions retained more political knowledge**.
1716 +
1717 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1718 + - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
1719 + - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
1720 +{{/expandable}}
1721 +
1722 +{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1723 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1724 + - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
1725 + - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
1726 +
1727 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1728 + - Limited to **short-term persuasion effects**, without long-term follow-up.
1729 + - Does not explore **the role of misinformation in political persuasion**.
1730 +
1731 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1732 + - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
1733 + - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
1734 +{{/expandable}}
1735 +
1736 +{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1737 +- Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
1738 +- Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
1739 +- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
1740 +{{/expandable}}
1741 +
1742 +{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1743 +1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
1744 +2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
1745 +3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
1746 +{{/expandable}}
1747 +
1748 +{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1749 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
1750 +##~{~{/expand}}##
1751 +{{/expandable}}
1752 +{{/expandable}}
Cultural Voyeurism A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Intera.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +103.1 KB
Content