Skip to Content
0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09
From version 70.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 03:56
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 4.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 01:56
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -15,15 +15,14 @@
15 15  
16 16  == Research Studies Repository ==
17 17  
18 -
19 -= Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding =
20 -{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
18 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand..."}}
19 +title="Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding"}
21 21  **Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
22 22  **Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
23 23  **Author(s):** Smith et al.
24 24  **Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
25 25  **DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
26 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
25 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science 
27 27  
28 28  **Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
29 29  
... ... @@ -48,1243 +48,35 @@
48 48  - Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
49 49  {{/expand}}
50 50  
51 -{{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
52 -**Source:** [Journal/Institution Name]
53 -**Date of Publication:** [Publication Date]
54 -**Author(s):** [Author(s) Name(s)]
55 -**Title:** "[Study Title]"
56 -**DOI:** [DOI or Link]
57 -**Subject Matter:** [Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]
50 +title="Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding"}
51 +**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
52 +**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
53 +**Author(s):** Smith et al.
54 +**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
55 +**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
56 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science 
58 58  
59 ----
58 +**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
60 60  
61 -## **Key Statistics**
62 -1. **General Observations:**
63 - - [Statistical finding or observation]
64 - - [Statistical finding or observation]
60 +=== **Key Statistics** ===
65 65  
66 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
67 - - [Breakdown of findings by gender, race, or other subgroups]
68 -
69 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
70 - - [Any additional findings or significant statistics]
71 -
72 ----
73 -
74 -## **Findings**
75 -1. **Primary Observations:**
76 - - [High-level findings or trends in the study]
77 -
78 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
79 - - [Disparities or differences highlighted in the study]
80 -
81 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
82 - - [Detailed explanation of any notable specific findings]
83 -
84 ----
85 -
86 -## **Critique and Observations**
87 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
88 - - [Examples: strong methodology, large dataset, etc.]
89 -
90 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
91 - - [Examples: data gaps, lack of upstream analysis, etc.]
92 -
93 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
94 - - [Ideas for further research or addressing limitations]
95 -
96 ----
97 -
98 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
99 -- [Explanation of how this study contributes to your subproject goals.]
100 -- [Any key arguments or findings that support or challenge your views.]
101 -
102 ----
103 -
104 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
105 -1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
106 -2. [Potential studies or sources to complement this analysis.]
107 -
108 ----
109 -
110 -## **Summary of Research Study**
111 -This study examines **[core research question or focus]**, providing insights into **[main subject area]**. The research utilized **[sample size and methodology]** to assess **[key variables or measured outcomes]**.
112 -
113 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
114 -
115 ----
116 -
117 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
118 -{{velocity}}
119 -#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
120 -#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
121 -#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
122 -[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
123 -#else
124 -{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
125 -#end
126 -{{/velocity}}
127 -
128 -{{/expand}}
129 -
130 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
131 -
132 -
133 -
134 ----
135 -
136 -{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}}
137 -**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
138 -**Date of Publication:** *2020*
139 -**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
140 -**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
141 -**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
142 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*
143 -
144 ----
145 -
146 -## **Key Statistics**
147 147  1. **General Observations:**
148 - - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
149 - - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
63 + - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
64 + - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
150 150  
151 151  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
152 - - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
153 - - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
67 + - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
68 + - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
154 154  
155 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
156 - - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
157 - - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
70 +=== **Findings** ===
158 158  
159 ----
72 +- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
73 +- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
160 160  
161 -## **Findings**
162 -1. **Primary Observations:**
163 - - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
164 - - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
75 +=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
165 165  
166 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
167 - - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
168 - - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
77 +- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
78 +- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
169 169  
170 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
171 - - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
172 - - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
173 173  
174 ----
175 -
176 -## **Critique and Observations**
177 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
178 - - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
179 - - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
180 -
181 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
182 - - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
183 - - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
184 -
185 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
186 - - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
187 - - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
188 -
189 ----
190 -
191 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
192 -- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
193 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
194 -
195 ----
196 -
197 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
198 -1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
199 -2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
200 -
201 ----
202 -
203 -## **Summary of Research Study**
204 -This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.
205 -
206 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
207 -
208 ----
209 -
210 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
211 -{{velocity}}
212 -#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
213 -#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
214 -#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
215 -[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
216 -#else
217 -{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
218 -#end
219 -{{/velocity}}
220 -
221 -{{/expand}}
222 -
223 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
224 -
225 -
226 -{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}}
227 -**Source:** *Current Psychology*
228 -**Date of Publication:** *2024*
229 -**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
230 -**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
231 -**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
232 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
233 -
234 ----
235 -
236 -## **Key Statistics**
237 -1. **General Observations:**
238 - - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
239 - - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
240 -
241 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
242 - - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
243 - - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
244 -
245 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
246 - - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
247 - - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
248 -
249 ----
250 -
251 -## **Findings**
252 -1. **Primary Observations:**
253 - - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
254 - - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
255 -
256 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
257 - - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
258 - - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
259 -
260 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
261 - - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
262 - - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
263 -
264 ----
265 -
266 -## **Critique and Observations**
267 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
268 - - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
269 - - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
270 -
271 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
272 - - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
273 - - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
274 -
275 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
276 - - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
277 - - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
278 -
279 ----
280 -
281 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
282 -- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
283 -- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
284 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
285 -
286 ----
287 -
288 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
289 -1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
290 -2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
291 -3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
292 -
293 ----
294 -
295 -## **Summary of Research Study**
296 -This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.
297 -
298 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
299 -
300 ----
301 -
302 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
303 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
304 -
305 -{{/expand}}
306 -
307 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
308 -
309 -{{expand title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" expanded="false"}} Source: Addictive Behaviors
310 -Date of Publication: 2016
311 -Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
312 -Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
313 -DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
314 -Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
315 -
316 -Key Statistics
317 -General Observations:
318 -
319 -Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
320 -Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
321 -Subgroup Analysis:
322 -
323 -Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
324 -Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
325 -Other Significant Data Points:
326 -
327 -Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
328 -Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
329 -Findings
330 -Primary Observations:
331 -
332 -Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
333 -Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
334 -Subgroup Trends:
335 -
336 -Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
337 -College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
338 -Specific Case Analysis:
339 -
340 -Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
341 -Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
342 -Critique and Observations
343 -Strengths of the Study:
344 -
345 -Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
346 -Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
347 -Limitations of the Study:
348 -
349 -Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
350 -Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
351 -Suggestions for Improvement:
352 -
353 -Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
354 -Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
355 -Relevance to Subproject
356 -Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
357 -Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
358 -Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
359 -Suggestions for Further Exploration
360 -Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
361 -Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
362 -Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
363 -Summary of Research Study
364 -This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
365 -
366 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
367 -
368 -📄 Download Full Study
369 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
370 -
371 -{{/expand}}
372 -
373 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
374 -
375 -{{expand title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?" expanded="false"}}
376 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
377 -**Date of Publication:** *2014*
378 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
379 -**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
380 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
381 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
382 -
383 ----
384 -
385 -## **Key Statistics**
386 -1. **General Observations:**
387 - - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
388 - - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
389 -
390 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
391 - - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
392 - - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
393 -
394 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
395 - - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
396 - - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
397 -
398 ----
399 -
400 -## **Findings**
401 -1. **Primary Observations:**
402 - - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
403 - - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
404 -
405 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
406 - - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
407 - - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
408 -
409 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
410 - - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
411 - - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
412 -
413 ----
414 -
415 -## **Critique and Observations**
416 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
417 - - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
418 - - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
419 -
420 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
421 - - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
422 - - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
423 -
424 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
425 - - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
426 - - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
427 -
428 ----
429 -
430 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
431 -- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
432 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
433 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
434 -
435 ----
436 -
437 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
438 -1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
439 -2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
440 -3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
441 -
442 ----
443 -
444 -## **Summary of Research Study**
445 -This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.
446 -
447 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
448 -
449 ----
450 -
451 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
452 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
453 -
454 -{{/expand}}
455 -
456 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
457 -
458 -{{expand title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation" expanded="false"}}
459 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
460 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
461 -**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
462 -**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
463 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
464 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
465 -
466 ----
467 -
468 -## **Key Statistics**
469 -1. **General Observations:**
470 - - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
471 - - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
472 -
473 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
474 - - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
475 - - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
476 -
477 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
478 - - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
479 - - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
480 -
481 ----
482 -
483 -## **Findings**
484 -1. **Primary Observations:**
485 - - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
486 - - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
487 -
488 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
489 - - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
490 - - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
491 -
492 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
493 - - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
494 - - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
495 -
496 ----
497 -
498 -## **Critique and Observations**
499 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
500 - - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
501 - - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
502 -
503 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
504 - - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
505 - - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
506 -
507 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
508 - - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
509 - - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
510 -
511 ----
512 -
513 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
514 -- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
515 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
516 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
517 -
518 ----
519 -
520 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
521 -1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
522 -2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
523 -3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
524 -
525 ----
526 -
527 -## **Summary of Research Study**
528 -This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.
529 -
530 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
531 -
532 ----
533 -
534 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
535 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
536 -
537 -{{/expand}}
538 -
539 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
540 -
541 -{{expand title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media" expanded="false"}}
542 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
543 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
544 -**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
545 -**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
546 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
547 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
548 -
549 ----
550 -
551 -## **Key Statistics**
552 -1. **General Observations:**
553 - - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
554 - - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
555 -
556 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
557 - - **90% of experts were from Western countries**, and **83% were male**.
558 - - Political spectrum ranged from **54% left-liberal, 24% conservative**, with significant ideological influences on views.
559 -
560 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
561 - - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
562 - - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
563 -
564 ----
565 -
566 -## **Findings**
567 -1. **Primary Observations:**
568 - - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
569 - - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
570 -
571 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
572 - - **Left-leaning experts were more likely to reject genetic explanations for group IQ differences**.
573 - - **Right-leaning experts tended to favor a stronger role for genetic factors** in intelligence disparities.
574 -
575 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
576 - - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
577 - - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
578 -
579 ----
580 -
581 -## **Critique and Observations**
582 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
583 - - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
584 - - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
585 -
586 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
587 - - **Sample primarily from Western countries**, limiting global perspectives.
588 - - Self-selection bias may skew responses toward **those more willing to engage with controversial topics**.
589 -
590 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
591 - - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
592 - - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
593 -
594 ----
595 -
596 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
597 -- Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
598 -- Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
599 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
600 -
601 ----
602 -
603 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
604 -1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
605 -2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
606 -3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
607 -
608 ----
609 -
610 -## **Summary of Research Study**
611 -This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.
612 -
613 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
614 -
615 ----
616 -
617 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
618 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
619 -
620 -{{/expand}}
621 -
622 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
623 -
624 -{{expand title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications" expanded="false"}}
625 -**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
626 -**Date of Publication:** *2010*
627 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
628 -**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
629 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
630 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
631 -
632 ----
633 -
634 -## **Key Statistics**
635 -1. **General Observations:**
636 - - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
637 - - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
638 -
639 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
640 - - Discusses **four primary definitions of race/subspecies**: Essentialist, Taxonomic, Population-based, and Lineage-based.
641 - - Suggests that **human heterozygosity levels are comparable to species that are classified as polytypic**.
642 -
643 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
644 - - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
645 - - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
646 -
647 ----
648 -
649 -## **Findings**
650 -1. **Primary Observations:**
651 - - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
652 - - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
653 -
654 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
655 - - Discusses **how race concepts evolved over time** in biological sciences.
656 - - Compares **human diversity with that of other primates** such as chimpanzees and gorillas.
657 -
658 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
659 - - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
660 - - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
661 -
662 ----
663 -
664 -## **Critique and Observations**
665 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
666 - - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
667 - - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
668 -
669 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
670 - - Controversial topic with **strong opposing views in anthropology and genetics**.
671 - - **Relies on broad genetic trends**, but does not analyze individual-level genetic variation in depth.
672 -
673 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
674 - - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
675 - - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
676 -
677 ----
678 -
679 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
680 -- Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
681 -- Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
682 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
683 -
684 ----
685 -
686 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
687 -1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
688 -2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
689 -3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
690 -
691 ----
692 -
693 -## **Summary of Research Study**
694 -This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.
695 -
696 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
697 -
698 ----
699 -
700 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
701 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
702 -
703 -{{/expand}}
704 -
705 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
706 -
707 -{{expand title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age" expanded="false"}}
708 -**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
709 -**Date of Publication:** *2013*
710 -**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
711 -**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
712 -**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
713 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
714 -
715 ----
716 -
717 -## **Key Statistics**
718 -1. **General Observations:**
719 - - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
720 - - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
721 -
722 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
723 - - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
724 - - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
725 -
726 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
727 - - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
728 - - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
729 -
730 ----
731 -
732 -## **Findings**
733 -1. **Primary Observations:**
734 - - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
735 - - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
736 -
737 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
738 - - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
739 - - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
740 -
741 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
742 - - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
743 - - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
744 -
745 ----
746 -
747 -## **Critique and Observations**
748 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
749 - - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
750 - - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
751 -
752 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
753 - - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
754 - - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
755 -
756 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
757 - - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
758 - - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
759 -
760 ----
761 -
762 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
763 -- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
764 -- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
765 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
766 -
767 ----
768 -
769 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
770 -1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
771 -2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
772 -3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
773 -
774 ----
775 -
776 -## **Summary of Research Study**
777 -This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.
778 -
779 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
780 -
781 ----
782 -
783 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
784 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
785 -
786 -{{/expand}}
787 -
788 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
789 -
790 -{{expand title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports" expanded="false"}}
791 -**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
792 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
793 -**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
794 -**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
795 -**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
796 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
797 -
798 ----
799 -
800 -## **Key Statistics**
801 -1. **General Observations:**
802 - - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
803 - - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
804 -
805 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
806 - - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
807 - - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
808 -
809 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
810 - - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
811 - - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
812 -
813 ----
814 -
815 -## **Findings**
816 -1. **Primary Observations:**
817 - - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
818 - - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
819 -
820 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
821 - - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
822 - - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
823 -
824 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
825 - - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
826 - - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
827 -
828 ----
829 -
830 -## **Critique and Observations**
831 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
832 - - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
833 - - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
834 -
835 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
836 - - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
837 - - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
838 -
839 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
840 - - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
841 - - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
842 -
843 ----
844 -
845 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
846 -- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
847 -- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
848 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
849 -
850 ----
851 -
852 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
853 -1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
854 -2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
855 -3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
856 -
857 ----
858 -
859 -## **Summary of Research Study**
860 -This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.
861 -
862 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
863 -
864 ----
865 -
866 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
867 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
868 -
869 -{{/expand}}
870 -
871 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
872 -
873 -{{expand title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History" expanded="false"}}
874 -**Source:** *Nature*
875 -**Date of Publication:** *2009*
876 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
877 -**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
878 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
879 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*
880 -
881 ----
882 -
883 -## **Key Statistics**
884 -1. **General Observations:**
885 - - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
886 - - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
887 -
888 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
889 - - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
890 - - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
891 -
892 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
893 - - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
894 - - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
895 -
896 ----
897 -
898 -## **Findings**
899 -1. **Primary Observations:**
900 - - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
901 - - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
902 -
903 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
904 - - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
905 - - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
906 -
907 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
908 - - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
909 - - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
910 -
911 ----
912 -
913 -## **Critique and Observations**
914 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
915 - - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
916 - - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
917 -
918 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
919 - - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
920 - - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
921 -
922 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
923 - - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
924 - - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
925 -
926 ----
927 -
928 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
929 -- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
930 -- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
931 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
932 -
933 ----
934 -
935 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
936 -1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
937 -2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
938 -3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
939 -
940 ----
941 -
942 -## **Summary of Research Study**
943 -This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.
944 -
945 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
946 -
947 ----
948 -
949 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
950 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
951 -
952 -{{/expand}}
953 -
954 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
955 -
956 -
957 -{{expand title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations" expanded="false"}}
958 -**Source:** *Nature*
959 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
960 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
961 -**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
962 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
963 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
964 -
965 ----
966 -
967 -## **Key Statistics**
968 -1. **General Observations:**
969 - - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
970 - - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
971 -
972 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
973 - - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
974 - - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
975 -
976 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
977 - - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
978 - - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
979 -
980 ----
981 -
982 -## **Findings**
983 -1. **Primary Observations:**
984 - - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
985 - - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
986 -
987 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
988 - - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
989 - - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
990 -
991 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
992 - - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
993 - - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
994 -
995 ----
996 -
997 -## **Critique and Observations**
998 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
999 - - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
1000 - - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
1001 -
1002 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1003 - - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
1004 - - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
1005 -
1006 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1007 - - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
1008 - - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
1009 -
1010 ----
1011 -
1012 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1013 -- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
1014 -- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
1015 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
1016 -
1017 ----
1018 -
1019 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1020 -1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
1021 -2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
1022 -3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
1023 -
1024 ----
1025 -
1026 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1027 -This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.
1028 -
1029 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1030 -
1031 ----
1032 -
1033 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1034 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
1035 -
1036 -{{/expand}}
1037 -
1038 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1039 -
1040 -{{expand title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies" expanded="false"}}
1041 -**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
1042 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1043 -**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
1044 -**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
1045 -**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
1046 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
1047 -
1048 ----
1049 -
1050 -## **Key Statistics**
1051 -1. **General Observations:**
1052 - - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
1053 - - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
1054 -
1055 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1056 - - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
1057 - - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
1058 -
1059 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1060 - - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
1061 - - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
1062 -
1063 ----
1064 -
1065 -## **Findings**
1066 -1. **Primary Observations:**
1067 - - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
1068 - - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
1069 -
1070 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1071 - - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (~70-80%)**.
1072 - - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
1073 -
1074 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1075 - - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
1076 - - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
1077 -
1078 ----
1079 -
1080 -## **Critique and Observations**
1081 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1082 - - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
1083 - - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
1084 -
1085 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1086 - - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
1087 - - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
1088 -
1089 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1090 - - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
1091 - - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
1092 -
1093 ----
1094 -
1095 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1096 -- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
1097 -- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
1098 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
1099 -
1100 ----
1101 -
1102 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1103 -1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
1104 -2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
1105 -3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
1106 -
1107 ----
1108 -
1109 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1110 -This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.
1111 -
1112 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1113 -
1114 ----
1115 -
1116 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1117 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
1118 -
1119 -{{/expand}}
1120 -
1121 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1122 -
1123 -{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}}
1124 -**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
1125 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1126 -**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
1127 -**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
1128 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
1129 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*
1130 -
1131 ----
1132 -
1133 -## **Key Statistics**
1134 -1. **General Observations:**
1135 - - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
1136 - - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
1137 -
1138 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1139 - - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
1140 - - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
1141 -
1142 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1143 - - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
1144 - - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
1145 -
1146 ----
1147 -
1148 -## **Findings**
1149 -1. **Primary Observations:**
1150 - - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
1151 - - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
1152 -
1153 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1154 - - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
1155 - - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
1156 -
1157 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1158 - - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
1159 - - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
1160 -
1161 ----
1162 -
1163 -## **Critique and Observations**
1164 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1165 - - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
1166 - - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
1167 -
1168 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1169 - - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
1170 - - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
1171 -
1172 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1173 - - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
1174 - - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
1175 -
1176 ----
1177 -
1178 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1179 -- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
1180 -- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
1181 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
1182 -
1183 ----
1184 -
1185 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1186 -1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
1187 -2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
1188 -3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
1189 -
1190 ----
1191 -
1192 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1193 -This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.
1194 -
1195 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1196 -
1197 ----
1198 -
1199 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1200 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
1201 -
1202 -{{/expand}}
1203 -
1204 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1205 -
1206 -{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}}
1207 -**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
1208 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1209 -**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
1210 -**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
1211 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
1212 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*
1213 -
1214 ----
1215 -
1216 -## **Key Statistics**
1217 -1. **General Observations:**
1218 - - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
1219 - - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
1220 -
1221 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1222 - - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
1223 - - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
1224 -
1225 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1226 - - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
1227 - - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
1228 -
1229 ----
1230 -
1231 -## **Findings**
1232 -1. **Primary Observations:**
1233 - - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
1234 - - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
1235 -
1236 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1237 - - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
1238 - - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
1239 -
1240 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1241 - - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
1242 - - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
1243 -
1244 ----
1245 -
1246 -## **Critique and Observations**
1247 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1248 - - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
1249 - - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
1250 -
1251 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1252 - - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
1253 - - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
1254 -
1255 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1256 - - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
1257 - - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
1258 -
1259 ----
1260 -
1261 -## **Relevance to Subproject**
1262 -- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
1263 -- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
1264 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
1265 -
1266 ----
1267 -
1268 -## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1269 -1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
1270 -2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
1271 -3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
1272 -
1273 ----
1274 -
1275 -## **Summary of Research Study**
1276 -This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.
1277 -
1278 -This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1279 -
1280 ----
1281 -
1282 -## **📄 Download Full Study**
1283 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
1284 -
1285 -{{/expand}}
1286 -
1287 -{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1288 -
1289 -
1290 -
81 +
10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -1.2 MB
Content
10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -627.5 KB
Content
10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -280.8 KB
Content
10.1016_j.drugalcdep.2006.02.010.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -523.1 KB
Content
10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -755.3 KB
Content
10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -440.0 KB
Content
10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2.1 MB
Content
10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -210.7 KB
Content
10.1016_j.paid.2009.09.007E-mail.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -122.0 KB
Content
10.1016_j.shpsc.2013.04.010E-mail.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -776.8 KB
Content
10.1016_j.ssresearch.2005.09.001qThis.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -217.7 KB
Content
10.1016_j.tig.2007.08.013.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2.1 MB
Content
10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -519.3 KB
Content
10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -279.4 KB
Content
10.1038_nature08365.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -585.7 KB
Content
10.1038_nature18964.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -5.7 MB
Content
10.1038_ng.328.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -9.9 MB
Content
10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -372.1 KB
Content
10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -632.5 KB
Content
10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -682.2 KB
Content
10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2.6 MB
Content
10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182549.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2.4 MB
Content
10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -313.8 KB
Content
10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -307.1 KB
Content
10.1093_acrefore_9780190228613.013.502.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2.0 MB
Content
10.1093_hcr_hqaa004.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -472.9 KB
Content
10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -274.5 KB
Content
10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -114.1 KB
Content
10.1093_restud_rdz003.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -1.1 MB
Content
10.1093_sf_soaa026Downloaded.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -1.9 MB
Content
10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -21.8 MB
Content
10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -1023.1 KB
Content
10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -341.7 KB
Content
10.1126_science.1078311.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -738.4 KB
Content
10.1177_0003122415591268http___asr.sagepub.com.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -837.6 KB
Content
10.1177_0011000017717705The.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -387.6 KB
Content
10.1177_0021934718803737Journal.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -97.1 KB
Content
10.1177_0146167209338524.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -162.6 KB
Content
10.1177_0956797611427918.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -3.3 MB
Content
10.1177_0956797618813087Psychological.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -301.7 KB
Content
10.1177_09567976221084257Psychological.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2.1 MB
Content
10.1177_13684302211023551Group.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -458.3 KB
Content
10.1177_1948550618783713.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -263.1 KB
Content
10.1300_J233v05n02_01.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -656.4 KB
Content
10.15195_v4.a19.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -308.6 KB
Content
10.1891_1946.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -523.1 KB
Content
10.3109_10826087709027235.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -698.4 KB
Content
10.3390_jintelligence5010001.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -288.1 KB
Content
10.3968_j.ccc.1923670020120803.1189.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -112.5 KB
Content
10.4054_DemRes.2019.40.45.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -831.0 KB
Content
10.4054_DemRes.2022.46.33.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -339.3 KB
Content
40_047_7007844_036_021_2017 [pdf_ pdfs].pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -5.2 MB
Content