0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 64.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 02:40
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 67.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 02:59
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -46,12 +46,14 @@
46 46  
47 47  - Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
48 48  - Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
49 +{{/expand}}
49 49  
51 +{{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
50 50  **Source:** [Journal/Institution Name]
51 51  **Date of Publication:** [Publication Date]
52 52  **Author(s):** [Author(s) Name(s)]
53 53  **Title:** "[Study Title]"
54 -**DOI:** 10.1093_sf_soaa026
56 +**DOI:** [DOI or Link]
55 55  **Subject Matter:** [Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]
56 56  
57 57  ---
... ... @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@
114 114  
115 115  ## **📄 Download Full Study**
116 116  {{velocity}}
117 -#set($doi = "10.1093_sf_soaa026")
119 +#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
118 118  #set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
119 119  #if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
120 120  [[Download>>attach:$filename]]
... ... @@ -123,20 +123,198 @@
123 123  #end
124 124  {{/velocity}}
125 125  
128 +{{/expand}}
129 +
130 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
131 +
132 +
133 +💥 If this works, we can move on to the next study! 🚀 Let me know how it looks!
134 +
135 +I'll process the next study and populate the template accordingly. Let me extract the key details from the uploaded document now.
136 +
137 +Here's the structured summary for the next study:
138 +
126 126  ---
127 127  
128 -### **🔹 Key Fixes & Features**
129 -✅ **The DOI is now embedded** (`10.1093_sf_soaa026`)
130 -✅ **PDF Auto-Linking Enabled** → If the PDF is uploaded, it **automatically appears**
131 -✅ **Clearer "🚨 PDF Not Available"** → Now in **bright red** to separate sections
141 +{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}}
142 +**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
143 +**Date of Publication:** *2020*
144 +**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
145 +**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
146 +**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
147 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*
132 132  
133 133  ---
134 134  
135 -### **🚀 What to Do Next**
136 -1️⃣ **Copy this updated entry into XWiki.**
137 -2️⃣ **Confirm that the PDF (`10.1093_sf_soaa026.pdf`) is uploaded in Attachments.**
138 -3️⃣ **Save & Check If the Link Works.**
139 -4️⃣ **If it works, we move to the next study!**
151 +## **Key Statistics**
152 +1. **General Observations:**
153 + - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
154 + - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
140 140  
141 -💥 **Let me know once this one is done, and we’ll continue!** 🚀
156 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
157 + - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
158 + - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
142 142  
160 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
161 + - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
162 + - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
163 +
164 +---
165 +
166 +## **Findings**
167 +1. **Primary Observations:**
168 + - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
169 + - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
170 +
171 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
172 + - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
173 + - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
174 +
175 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
176 + - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
177 + - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
178 +
179 +---
180 +
181 +## **Critique and Observations**
182 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
183 + - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
184 + - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
185 +
186 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
187 + - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
188 + - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
189 +
190 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
191 + - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
192 + - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
193 +
194 +---
195 +
196 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
197 +- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
198 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
199 +
200 +---
201 +
202 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
203 +1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
204 +2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
205 +
206 +---
207 +
208 +## **Summary of Research Study**
209 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.
210 +
211 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
212 +
213 +---
214 +
215 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
216 +{{velocity}}
217 +#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
218 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
219 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
220 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
221 +#else
222 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
223 +#end
224 +{{/velocity}}
225 +
226 +{{/expand}}
227 +
228 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
229 +
230 +
231 +{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}}
232 +**Source:** *Current Psychology*
233 +**Date of Publication:** *2024*
234 +**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
235 +**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
236 +**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
237 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
238 +
239 +---
240 +
241 +## **Key Statistics**
242 +1. **General Observations:**
243 + - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
244 + - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
245 +
246 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
247 + - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
248 + - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
249 +
250 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
251 + - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
252 + - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
253 +
254 +---
255 +
256 +## **Findings**
257 +1. **Primary Observations:**
258 + - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
259 + - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
260 +
261 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
262 + - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
263 + - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
264 +
265 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
266 + - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
267 + - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
268 +
269 +---
270 +
271 +## **Critique and Observations**
272 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
273 + - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
274 + - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
275 +
276 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
277 + - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
278 + - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
279 +
280 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
281 + - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
282 + - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
283 +
284 +---
285 +
286 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
287 +- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
288 +- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
289 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
290 +
291 +---
292 +
293 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
294 +1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
295 +2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
296 +3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
297 +
298 +---
299 +
300 +## **Summary of Research Study**
301 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.
302 +
303 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
304 +
305 +---
306 +
307 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
308 +{{velocity}}
309 +#set($doi = "10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z")
310 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
311 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
312 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
313 +#else
314 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
315 +#end
316 +{{/velocity}}
317 +
318 +{{/expand}}
319 +
320 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
321 +
322 +