Changes for page Research at a Glance


on 2025/06/19 19:12
Summary
-
- Banas et al. - 2020 - Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice.pdf
- Cultural Voyeurism A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Intera.pdf
- lai2014.pdf
- lenk-et-al-white-americans-preference-for-black-people-in-advertising-has-increased-in-the-past-66-years-a-meta-analysis.pdf
Details
- Page properties
-
- Parent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -Main Categories.Science & Research.WebHome1 +Main.Studies.WebHome - Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. XWikiGuest1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,583 +4,471 @@ 1 -{{toc/}} 2 - 3 - 4 4 = Research at a Glance = 5 5 3 +== Introduction == 6 6 5 +Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various fields such as **social psychology, public policy, behavioral economics, and more**. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout. 7 7 8 - Welcometothe **Researchat a Glance** repository.Thissection serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various importantRacial themes. Each study is categorized for easy navigation andpresented in a **collapsible format** tomaintain a clean layout. I wanted to make this fora couple of reasons. Number one is organization. There are a ton of useful studies out there that expose the truth, sometimes inadvertently.You'll notice that in this initial draft the summaries are often woke and reflect the bias of the AI writing them as well as the researchers politically correct conclusion in most cases. That's because I haven't gotten to going through and pointing out the reasons I put all of them in here.7 +=== How to Use This Repository === 9 9 10 - 11 - There is often an underlying hypocrisy or double standard, saying the quiet part out loud, or conclusions that are so much of an antithesis to what the data shows that made me want to include it. At least, thats the idea for once its polished. I have about 150 more studies to upload, so it will be a few weeks before I get through it all. Until such time, feel free to search for them yourself and edit in what you find, or add your own studies. If you like you can do it manually, or if you'd rather go the route I did, just rename the study to its doi number and feed the study into an AI and tell them to summarize the study using the following format: 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 15 - Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic. 16 16 - Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**. 17 17 - Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors. 18 18 - If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability. 19 -- You'll also find a download link to the original full study in pdf form at the bottom of the collapsible block. 20 20 14 +{{toc/}} 21 21 16 +== Research Studies Repository == 22 22 23 -= Genetics = 24 24 25 -{{expandable summary=" 19 += Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding = 20 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}} 21 +**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology 22 +**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15 23 +**Author(s):** Smith et al. 24 +**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies" 25 +**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235) 26 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science 26 26 27 -Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}} 28 -**Source:** *Nature* 29 -**Date of Publication:** *2009* 30 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh* 31 -**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"* 32 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365) 33 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 28 +**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research` 34 34 35 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 30 +=== **Key Statistics** === 31 + 36 36 1. **General Observations:** 37 - - Studyanalyzed**132individualsfrom 25 diverse Indiangroups**.38 - - Identified two major ancestral populations:**Ancestral NorthIndians (ANI)**and**Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.33 + - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed. 34 + - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**. 39 39 40 40 2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 41 - - ANI ancestryiscloselyrelatedto**Middle Easterners,CentralAsians, andEuropeans**.42 - - ASIancestryis **geneticallydistinctfromANIandEast Asians**.37 + - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**. 38 + - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage. 43 43 44 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 45 - - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups. 46 - - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation. 47 -{{/expandable}} 40 +=== **Findings** === 48 48 49 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 50 -1. **Primary Observations:** 51 - - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**. 52 - - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India. 42 +- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry. 43 +- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification. 53 53 54 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 55 - - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**. 56 - - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**. 45 +=== **Relevance to Subproject** === 57 57 58 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 59 - - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups. 60 - - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation. 61 -{{/expandable}} 47 +- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research. 48 +- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies. 49 +{{/expand}} 62 62 63 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 64 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 65 - - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history. 66 - - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**. 51 +{{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}} 52 +**Source:** [Journal/Institution Name] 53 +**Date of Publication:** [Publication Date] 54 +**Author(s):** [Author(s) Name(s)] 55 +**Title:** "[Study Title]" 56 +**DOI:** [DOI or Link] 57 +**Subject Matter:** [Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics] 67 67 68 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 69 - - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**. 70 - - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era. 59 +--- 71 71 72 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 73 - - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**. 74 - - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry. 75 -{{/expandable}} 76 - 77 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 78 -- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India. 79 -- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations. 80 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations. 81 -{{/expandable}} 82 - 83 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 84 -1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations. 85 -2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**. 86 -3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**. 87 -{{/expandable}} 88 - 89 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 90 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]] 91 -{{/expandable}} 92 -{{/expandable}} 93 - 94 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}} 95 -**Source:** *Nature* 96 -**Date of Publication:** *2016* 97 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others* 98 -**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"* 99 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964) 100 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 101 - 102 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 61 +## **Key Statistics** 103 103 1. **General Observations:** 104 - - Analyzed **high-coveragegenome sequences of300individualsfrom142 populations**.105 - - Included **many underrepresentedandindigenousgroups**from Africa,Asia, Europe,andthe Americas.63 + - [Statistical finding or observation] 64 + - [Statistical finding or observation] 106 106 107 107 2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 108 - - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups. 109 - - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania. 67 + - [Breakdown of findings by gender, race, or other subgroups] 110 110 111 111 3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 112 - - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**. 113 - - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**. 114 -{{/expandable}} 70 + - [Any additional findings or significant statistics] 115 115 116 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 72 +--- 73 + 74 +## **Findings** 117 117 1. **Primary Observations:** 118 - - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model. 119 - - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**. 76 + - [High-level findings or trends in the study] 120 120 121 121 2. **Subgroup Trends:** 122 - - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks. 123 - - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**. 79 + - [Disparities or differences highlighted in the study] 124 124 125 125 3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 126 - - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**. 127 - - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**. 128 -{{/expandable}} 82 + - [Detailed explanation of any notable specific findings] 129 129 130 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 84 +--- 85 + 86 +## **Critique and Observations** 131 131 1. **Strengths of the Study:** 132 - - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project. 133 - - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**. 88 + - [Examples: strong methodology, large dataset, etc.] 134 134 135 135 2. **Limitations of the Study:** 136 - - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability. 137 - - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully. 91 + - [Examples: data gaps, lack of upstream analysis, etc.] 138 138 139 139 3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 140 - - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling. 141 - - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations. 142 -{{/expandable}} 94 + - [Ideas for further research or addressing limitations] 143 143 144 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 145 -- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**. 146 -- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations. 147 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**. 148 -{{/expandable}} 96 +--- 149 149 150 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 151 -1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**. 152 -2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**. 153 -3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**. 154 -{{/expandable}} 98 +## **Relevance to Subproject** 99 +- [Explanation of how this study contributes to your subproject goals.] 100 +- [Any key arguments or findings that support or challenge your views.] 155 155 156 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 157 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]] 158 -{{/expandable}} 159 -{{/expandable}} 102 +--- 160 160 161 -{{expandable summary=" 104 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration** 105 +1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.] 106 +2. [Potential studies or sources to complement this analysis.] 162 162 163 -Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}} 164 -**Source:** *Nature Genetics* 165 -**Date of Publication:** *2015* 166 -**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma* 167 -**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"* 168 -**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328) 169 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 108 +--- 170 170 171 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 172 -1. **General Observations:** 173 - - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**. 174 - - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability. 110 +## **Summary of Research Study** 111 +This study examines **[core research question or focus]**, providing insights into **[main subject area]**. The research utilized **[sample size and methodology]** to assess **[key variables or measured outcomes]**. 175 175 176 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 177 - - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits. 178 - - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment. 113 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis. 179 179 180 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 181 - - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates. 182 - - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates. 183 -{{/expandable}} 115 +--- 184 184 185 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 186 -1. **Primary Observations:** 187 - - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences. 188 - - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**. 117 +## **📄 Download Full Study** 118 +{{velocity}} 119 +#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]") 120 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf") 121 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename")) 122 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]] 123 +#else 124 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}} 125 +#end 126 +{{/velocity}} 189 189 190 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 191 - - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (70-80%)**. 192 - - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**. 128 +{{/expand}} 193 193 194 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 195 - - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**. 196 - - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain. 197 -{{/expandable}} 130 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}} 198 198 199 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 200 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 201 - - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies. 202 - - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**. 203 203 204 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 205 - - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability. 206 - - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**. 207 207 208 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 209 - - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates. 210 - - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends. 211 -{{/expandable}} 134 +--- 212 212 213 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 214 -- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**. 215 -- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**. 216 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**. 217 -{{/expandable}} 136 +{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}} 137 +**Source:** *JAMA Network Open* 138 +**Date of Publication:** *2020* 139 +**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.* 140 +**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"* 141 +**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833) 142 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 218 218 219 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 220 -1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**. 221 -2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**. 222 -3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**. 223 -{{/expandable}} 144 +--- 224 224 225 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 226 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]] 227 -{{/expandable}} 228 -{{/expandable}} 229 - 230 -{{expandable summary=" 231 - 232 -Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}} 233 -**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics* 234 -**Date of Publication:** *2002* 235 -**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams* 236 -**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"* 237 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865) 238 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 239 - 240 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 146 +## **Key Statistics** 241 241 1. **General Observations:** 242 - - Africaharbors**thehighest genetic diversity**ofanyregion, making it keytounderstanding human evolution.243 - - The studyanalyzes**geneticvariationandlinkagedisequilibrium(LD)in Africanpopulations**.148 + - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data. 149 + - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults. 244 244 245 245 2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 246 - - Africanpopulations exhibit**greatergeneticdifferentiationcomparedto non-Africans**.247 - - **Migrationand admixture**haveshapedmodernAfrican genomesoverthepast**100,000years**.152 + - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**. 153 + - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency. 248 248 249 249 3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 250 - - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations. 251 - - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events. 252 -{{/expandable}} 156 + - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period. 157 + - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates. 253 253 254 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 159 +--- 160 + 161 +## **Findings** 255 255 1. **Primary Observations:** 256 - - Af ricanpopulations arethe**most geneticallydiverse**, supporting the*Recent AfricanOrigin*hypothesis.257 - - Genetic variationinAfrican populations can**help fine-mapcomplexdiseasegenes**.163 + - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**. 164 + - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend. 258 258 259 259 2. **Subgroup Trends:** 260 - - **West Africansexhibithighergenetic diversity**thanEast Africans duetodiffering migration patterns.261 - - PopulationssuchSan hunter-gatherersshowdeepgenetic divergence**.167 + - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**. 168 + - No major change observed for **married adults** over time. 262 262 263 263 3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 264 - - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**. 265 - - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**. 266 -{{/expandable}} 171 + - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity. 172 + - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors. 267 267 268 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 174 +--- 175 + 176 +## **Critique and Observations** 269 269 1. **Strengths of the Study:** 270 - - Provides**comprehensivegenetic analysis**of diverseAfricanpopulations.271 - - Highlights**how geneticdiversityimpacts health disparitiesanddiseaserisks**.178 + - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset. 179 + - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time. 272 272 273 273 2. **Limitations of the Study:** 274 - - Many **Africanpopulationsremainunderstudied**, limiting full understandingof diversity.275 - - Focusesmoreongeneticvariationthanon **specificdiseasemechanisms**.182 + - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**. 183 + - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity. 276 276 277 277 3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 278 - - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**. 279 - - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**. 280 -{{/expandable}} 186 + - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts. 187 + - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration. 281 281 282 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 283 -- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**. 284 -- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**. 285 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**. 286 -{{/expandable}} 189 +--- 287 287 288 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 289 -1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**. 290 -2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**. 291 -3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**. 292 -{{/expandable}} 191 +## **Relevance to Subproject** 192 +- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions. 193 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors. 293 293 294 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 295 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]] 296 -{{/expandable}} 297 -{{/expandable}} 195 +--- 298 298 299 -{{expandable summary=" 197 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration** 198 +1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics. 199 +2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends. 300 300 301 -Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}} 302 -**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint* 303 -**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024* 304 -**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.* 305 -**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"* 306 -**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021) 307 -**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 201 +--- 308 308 309 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 203 +## **Summary of Research Study** 204 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior. 205 + 206 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis. 207 + 208 +--- 209 + 210 +## **📄 Download Full Study** 211 +{{velocity}} 212 +#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833") 213 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf") 214 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename")) 215 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]] 216 +#else 217 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}} 218 +#end 219 +{{/velocity}} 220 + 221 +{{/expand}} 222 + 223 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}} 224 + 225 + 226 +{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}} 227 +**Source:** *Current Psychology* 228 +**Date of Publication:** *2024* 229 +**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver* 230 +**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"* 231 +**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z) 232 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 233 + 234 +--- 235 + 236 +## **Key Statistics** 310 310 1. **General Observations:** 311 - - Study analyze s**8,433ancientndividuals**from the past**14,000years**.312 - - I dentifies**347 genome-widesignificantloci**showingstrongselection.238 + - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**. 239 + - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels. 313 313 314 314 2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 315 - - Examines **WestEurasianpopulations**andtheirgeneticevolution.316 - - Tracks**changesin allelefrequenciesoverillennia**.242 + - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**. 243 + - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels. 317 317 318 318 3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 319 - - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits. 320 - - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**. 321 -{{/expandable}} 246 + - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis. 247 + - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification. 322 322 323 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 249 +--- 250 + 251 +## **Findings** 324 324 1. **Primary Observations:** 325 - - **Hundreds of alleleshavebeensubjecttodirectionalselection** overrecentmillennia.326 - - Traits like**immunefunction, metabolism,and cognitiveperformance**showstrongselection.253 + - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**. 254 + - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**. 327 327 328 328 2. **Subgroup Trends:** 329 - - Selectionpressure on **energystoragegenes** supports the**ThriftyGeneHypothesis**.330 - - ** Cognitive performance-related alleles**have undergoneselection,but their historical advantagesremainunclear.257 + - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity. 258 + - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels. 331 331 332 332 3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 333 - - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years. 334 - - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**. 335 - - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**. 336 -{{/expandable}} 261 + - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing. 262 + - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation. 337 337 338 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 264 +--- 265 + 266 +## **Critique and Observations** 339 339 1. **Strengths of the Study:** 340 - - ** Largestdataset todate** on natural selectionin humanancientDNA.341 - - Uses**direct allelefrequencytrackinginstead ofindirectmeasures**.268 + - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health. 269 + - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures. 342 342 343 343 2. **Limitations of the Study:** 344 - - Findingstranslatedirectly** to modernpopulations.345 - - ** Unclearwhetherobservedselectionpressurespersist today**.272 + - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels. 273 + - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research. 346 346 347 347 3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 348 - - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends. 349 - - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**. 350 -{{/expandable}} 276 + - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**. 277 + - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration. 351 351 352 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 353 -- Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations. 354 -- Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**. 355 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**. 356 -{{/expandable}} 279 +--- 357 357 358 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 359 -1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison. 360 -2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**. 361 -3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**. 362 -{{/expandable}} 281 +## **Relevance to Subproject** 282 +- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community. 283 +- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**. 284 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**. 363 363 364 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 365 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]] 366 -{{/expandable}} 367 -{{/expandable}} 286 +--- 368 368 369 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}} 370 -**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)* 371 -**Date of Publication:** *2013* 372 -**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.* 373 -**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"* 374 -**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54) 375 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 288 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration** 289 +1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health. 290 +2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels. 291 +3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation. 376 376 377 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 378 -1. **General Observations:** 379 - - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**. 380 - - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**. 293 +--- 381 381 382 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 383 - - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**. 384 - - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**. 295 +## **Summary of Research Study** 296 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**. 385 385 386 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 387 - - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings. 388 - - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**. 389 -{{/expandable}} 298 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis. 390 390 391 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 392 -1. **Primary Observations:** 393 - - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models. 394 - - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**. 300 +--- 395 395 396 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 397 - - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**. 398 - - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**. 302 +## **📄 Download Full Study** 303 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]] 399 399 400 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 401 - - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age. 402 - - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**. 403 -{{/expandable}} 305 +{{/expand}} 404 404 405 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 406 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 407 - - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**. 408 - - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence. 307 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}} 409 409 410 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 411 - - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability. 412 - - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time. 309 +{{expand title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" expanded="false"}} Source: Addictive Behaviors 310 +Date of Publication: 2016 311 +Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs 312 +Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" 313 +DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030 314 +Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development 413 413 414 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 415 - - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**. 416 - - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency. 417 -{{/expandable}} 316 +Key Statistics 317 +General Observations: 418 418 419 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 420 -- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**. 421 -- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**. 422 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**. 423 -{{/expandable}} 319 +Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time. 320 +Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms. 321 +Subgroup Analysis: 424 424 425 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 426 -1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**. 427 -2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**. 428 -3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**. 429 -{{/expandable}} 323 +Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts. 324 +Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use. 325 +Other Significant Data Points: 430 430 431 - {{expandablesummary="📄DownloadFullStudy"}}432 - [[DownloadFullStudy>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]433 - {{/expandable}}434 - {{/expandable}}327 +Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms. 328 +Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects. 329 +Findings 330 +Primary Observations: 435 435 436 -{{expandable summary="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}} 437 -**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)* 438 -**Date of Publication:** *2010* 439 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley* 440 -**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"* 441 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046) 442 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 332 +Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users. 333 +Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions. 334 +Subgroup Trends: 443 443 444 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 445 -1. **General Observations:** 446 - - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species. 447 - - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans. 336 +Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks. 337 +College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use. 338 +Specific Case Analysis: 448 448 449 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 450 - - Discusses **four primary definitions of race/subspecies**: Essentialist, Taxonomic, Population-based, and Lineage-based. 451 - - Suggests that **human heterozygosity levels are comparable to species that are classified as polytypic**. 340 +Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use. 341 +Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample. 342 +Critique and Observations 343 +Strengths of the Study: 452 452 453 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 454 - - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species. 455 - - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation. 456 -{{/expandable}} 345 +Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults. 346 +Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use. 347 +Limitations of the Study: 457 457 458 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 459 -1. **Primary Observations:** 460 - - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**. 461 - - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity. 349 +Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects. 350 +Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes. 351 +Suggestions for Improvement: 462 462 463 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 464 - - Discusses **how race concepts evolved over time** in biological sciences. 465 - - Compares **human diversity with that of other primates** such as chimpanzees and gorillas. 353 +Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health. 354 +Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure. 355 +Relevance to Subproject 356 +Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use. 357 +Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts. 358 +Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults. 359 +Suggestions for Further Exploration 360 +Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment. 361 +Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks. 362 +Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization. 363 +Summary of Research Study 364 +This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation. 466 466 467 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 468 - - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**. 469 - - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**. 470 -{{/expandable}} 366 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis. 471 471 472 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 473 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 474 - - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification. 475 - - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments. 368 +📄 Download Full Study 369 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]] 476 476 477 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 478 - - Controversial topic with **strong opposing views in anthropology and genetics**. 479 - - **Relies on broad genetic trends**, but does not analyze individual-level genetic variation in depth. 371 +{{/expand}} 480 480 481 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 482 - - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications. 483 - - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**. 484 -{{/expandable}} 373 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}} 485 485 486 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 487 -- Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**. 488 -- Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**. 489 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**. 490 -{{/expandable}} 375 +{{expand title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?" expanded="false"}} 376 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)* 377 +**Date of Publication:** *2014* 378 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy* 379 +**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"* 380 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012) 381 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 491 491 492 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 493 -1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**. 494 -2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**. 495 -3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**. 496 -{{/expandable}} 383 +--- 497 497 498 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 499 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]] 500 -{{/expandable}} 501 -{{/expandable}} 502 - 503 -= IQ = 504 - 505 -{{expandable summary="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}} 506 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)* 507 -**Date of Publication:** *2019* 508 -**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle* 509 -**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"* 510 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406) 511 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 512 - 513 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 385 +## **Key Statistics** 514 514 1. **General Observations:** 515 - - Surveyof **102experts**onintelligenceresearchandpublicdiscourse.516 - - Evaluatedexperts'backgrounds,political affiliations, andviewsoncontroversialtopicsin intelligenceresearch.387 + - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**. 388 + - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period. 517 517 518 518 2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 519 - - **90%ofexpertsefromWesterncountries**,and**83%weremale**.520 - - Political spectrum rangedfrom **54% left-liberal,24%conservative**,withsignificant ideologicalinfluencesonviews.391 + - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals. 392 + - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed. 521 521 522 522 3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 523 - - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**. 524 - - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**. 525 -{{/expandable}} 395 + - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**. 396 + - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**. 526 526 527 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 398 +--- 399 + 400 +## **Findings** 528 528 1. **Primary Observations:** 529 - - Experts overwhelmingly support**theg-factortheoryof intelligence**.530 - - **Heritabilityofintelligence**was widely accepted,though viewsdifferedonraceandgroupdifferences.402 + - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**. 403 + - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time. 531 531 532 532 2. **Subgroup Trends:** 533 - - ** Left-leaningexpertsweremorelikely torejectgeneticexplanationsfor groupIQ differences**.534 - - **Right-leaningexpertstendedtofavorstrongerroleforgenetic factors**nintelligencedisparities.406 + - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**. 407 + - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**. 535 535 536 536 3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 537 - - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions. 538 - - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues. 539 -{{/expandable}} 410 + - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**. 411 + - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute. 540 540 541 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 413 +--- 414 + 415 +## **Critique and Observations** 542 542 1. **Strengths of the Study:** 543 - - ** Largestexpertsurveyonntelligence research**to date.544 - - Providesinsightinto **how political orientationinfluencesscientificperspectives**.417 + - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data. 418 + - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies. 545 545 546 546 2. **Limitations of the Study:** 547 - - **Sampleprimarilyfrom Westerncountries**,limiting globalperspectives.548 - - Self-selectionbiasmayskewresponsestoward**thosemorewilling toengage withcontroversial topics**.421 + - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**. 422 + - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences. 549 549 550 550 3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 551 - - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**. 552 - - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**. 553 -{{/expandable}} 425 + - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**. 426 + - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time. 554 554 555 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 556 -- Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**. 557 -- Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science. 558 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research. 559 -{{/expandable}} 428 +--- 560 560 561 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 562 -1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence. 563 -2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**. 564 -3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings. 565 -{{/expandable}} 430 +## **Relevance to Subproject** 431 +- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**. 432 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**. 433 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**. 566 566 567 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 568 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]] 569 -{{/expandable}} 570 -{{/expandable}} 435 +--- 571 571 572 -{{expandable summary="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}} 573 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)* 574 -**Date of Publication:** *2015* 575 -**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer* 576 -**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"* 577 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008) 578 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 437 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration** 438 +1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline. 439 +2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**. 440 +3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**. 579 579 580 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 442 +--- 443 + 444 +## **Summary of Research Study** 445 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**. 446 + 447 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis. 448 + 449 +--- 450 + 451 +## **📄 Download Full Study** 452 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]] 453 + 454 +{{/expand}} 455 + 456 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}} 457 + 458 +{{expand title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation" expanded="false"}} 459 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)* 460 +**Date of Publication:** *2015* 461 +**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer* 462 +**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"* 463 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008) 464 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 465 + 466 +--- 467 + 468 +## **Key Statistics** 581 581 1. **General Observations:** 582 582 - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence. 583 583 - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. ... ... @@ -589,9 +589,10 @@ 589 589 3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 590 590 - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**. 591 591 - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**. 592 -{{/expandable}} 593 593 594 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 481 +--- 482 + 483 +## **Findings** 595 595 1. **Primary Observations:** 596 596 - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**. 597 597 - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**. ... ... @@ -603,9 +603,10 @@ 603 603 3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 604 604 - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ. 605 605 - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects. 606 -{{/expandable}} 607 607 608 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 496 +--- 497 + 498 +## **Critique and Observations** 609 609 1. **Strengths of the Study:** 610 610 - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs. 611 611 - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**. ... ... @@ -617,1781 +617,784 @@ 617 617 3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 618 618 - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings. 619 619 - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors. 620 -{{/expandable}} 621 621 622 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 511 +--- 512 + 513 +## **Relevance to Subproject** 623 623 - Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**. 624 624 - Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**. 625 625 - Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**. 626 -{{/expandable}} 627 627 628 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 518 +--- 519 + 520 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration** 629 629 1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations. 630 630 2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**. 631 631 3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**. 632 -{{/expandable}} 633 633 634 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 635 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]] 636 -{{/expandable}} 637 -{{/expandable}} 525 +--- 638 638 639 -{{expandable summary="Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding"}} 640 -**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology 641 -**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15 642 -**Author(s):** Smith et al. 643 -**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies" 644 -**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235) 645 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science 646 -{{/expandable}} 527 +## **Summary of Research Study** 528 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures. 647 647 648 - =Dating=530 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis. 649 649 650 -{{expandable summary="Study: Positioning Multiraciality in Cyberspace – Treatment of Multiracial Daters in an Online Dating Website"}} 651 -**Source:** *Social Forces* 652 -**Date of Publication:** *2016* 653 -**Author(s):** *Stephanie M. Curington, Kevin K. Anderson, and Jennifer Glass* 654 -**Title:** *"Positioning Multiraciality in Cyberspace: Treatment of Multiracial Daters in an Online Dating Website"* 655 -**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow007](https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow007) 656 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Dating, Multiracial Identity, Online Behavior* 532 +--- 657 657 658 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 659 -1. **General Observations:** 660 - - Data drawn from **over 1 million messaging records** from an online dating site. 661 - - Focused on how **monoracial users** (especially Whites) interact with **multiracial daters**. 534 +## **📄 Download Full Study** 535 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]] 662 662 663 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 664 - - **Multiracial Black/White and Asian/White women** received **fewer responses from White men** than their monoracial counterparts. 665 - - White daters showed **stronger preferences for monoracial identities**, particularly **own-race pairings**. 537 +{{/expand}} 666 666 667 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 668 - - **Multiracial men** fared worse than multiracial women across most pairings. 669 - - **Latina/White and Asian/White multiracial women** were **more positively received by Black and Hispanic men**. 670 -{{/expandable}} 539 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}} 671 671 672 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 673 -1. **Primary Observations:** 674 - - White users demonstrated a clear pattern of **in-group preference**, preferring other White users (monoracial or partially White) over more ambiguous multiracial identities. 675 - - Authors suggest this reflects **"boundary-maintaining behavior"** and **"latent racial bias"**. 541 +{{expand title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media" expanded="false"}} 542 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)* 543 +**Date of Publication:** *2019* 544 +**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle* 545 +**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"* 546 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406) 547 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 676 676 677 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 678 - - **Multiracial women with partial minority backgrounds** were more acceptable to non-White men than White men. 679 - - Multiracial daters were **often treated as ambiguous or “less desirable”** in ways the authors frame as **resistance to racial integration**. 549 +--- 680 680 681 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 682 - - The most rejected group? **Black/White multiracial men**, especially by **White women**, which the authors do not frame as bias in the same way. 683 - - The study shows **asymmetrical concern** — when Whites select inwardly, it's seen as racial boundary policing; when minorities do it, it's not pathologized. 684 -{{/expandable}} 685 - 686 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 687 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 688 - - Large, real-world dataset gives useful behavioral insight into **racial preferences in dating**. 689 - - Raises legitimate questions about **how race, desire, and group identity intersect**. 690 - 691 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 692 - - Frames **normal in-group preference among Whites as "resistance to multiraciality"**, rather than neutral human patterning. 693 - - Ignores **similar or stronger in-group preference among Black and Asian users**, which could indicate *universal patterns*, not White exceptionalism. 694 - - Uses CRT framing to subtly **morally indict Whites for preferring Whites**, while exempting other groups. 695 - 696 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 697 - - Treat all in-group preference equally across racial groups — not just when Whites do it. 698 - - Disaggregate by age, education, and regional variation to control for confounds. 699 - - Consider whether **multiracial identity is ambiguous** by nature and if that ambiguity reduces clarity of signals in dating. 700 -{{/expandable}} 701 - 702 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 703 -- Provides a data point in the **ongoing academic effort to pathologize White selectiveness**, even in private, personal domains like dating. 704 -- Demonstrates how **racial preferences are only considered “problematic” when they preserve White group boundaries**. 705 -- Supports analysis of **how DEI-aligned narratives seek to dissolve in-group loyalty under the guise of openness and inclusion**. 706 -{{/expandable}} 707 - 708 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 709 -1. Investigate how **media and dating platforms reinforce multiracialism as normative** despite evidence of natural in-group selection. 710 -2. Study the **psychological effects of being told your preferences are morally wrong if you're White**. 711 -3. Explore how **multiracial identities are strategically framed** depending on political or cultural goals — exoticization, integration, or guilt projection. 712 -{{/expandable}} 713 - 714 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 715 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:Curington et al. - Positioning Multiraciality in Cyberspace Treatment of Multiracial Daters in an Online Dating Websit.pdf]] 716 -{{/expandable}} 717 -{{/expandable}} 718 - 719 - 720 -{{expandable summary="Study: “A Little More Ghetto, a Little Less Cultured”: Are There Racial Stereotypes about Interracial Daters?"}} 721 -**Source:** *Sociology of Race and Ethnicity* 722 -**Date of Publication:** *2020* 723 -**Author(s):** *Andrew R. Flores and Ariela Schachter* 724 -**Title:** *"“A Little More Ghetto, a Little Less Cultured”: Are There Racial Stereotypes about Interracial Daters?"* 725 -**DOI:** [10.1177/2332649219871232](https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649219871232) 726 -**Subject Matter:** *Interracial Dating, Racial Stereotyping, Online Behavior* 727 - 728 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 551 +## **Key Statistics** 729 729 1. **General Observations:** 730 - - Used**experimentalsurvey data**from anationallyrepresentativesample(N = 1,070).731 - - Participants evaluatedhypotheticaldating profilesofWhiteindividualswhoexpressed interestin Black,Latino, or Asianpartners.553 + - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse. 554 + - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research. 732 732 733 733 2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 734 - - **White men interested in Black women** were rated as **less cultured, more aggressive, and lower class**. 735 - - White women interested in Black men were **viewed as less intelligent and more promiscuous**. 736 - - **Interest in Asian partners** did not carry the same negative stereotypes; in some cases, it improved perceived desirability. 557 + - **90% of experts were from Western countries**, and **83% were male**. 558 + - Political spectrum ranged from **54% left-liberal, 24% conservative**, with significant ideological influences on views. 737 737 738 738 3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 739 - - **Latino partners** were seen more neutrally, though men who dated them were seen as more “dominant.” 740 - - Across the board, **Whites who dated within their race were viewed most favorably**. 741 -{{/expandable}} 561 + - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**. 562 + - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**. 742 742 743 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 744 -1. **Primary Observations:** 745 - - Interracial daters—especially those dating Black individuals—are **subject to negative assumptions** about intelligence, class, and morality. 746 - - Stereotypes persist even in **hypothetical online contexts**, showing deep cultural associations. 564 +--- 747 747 748 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 749 - - White men who prefer Black women face **masculinity-linked stigma**, often tied to “urban” or “ghetto” tropes. 750 - - White women dating Black men are **framed as sexually deviant or socially undesirable**, particularly by other Whites. 751 - 752 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 753 - - The most negatively perceived pairing was **White woman/Black man**, reinforcing long-standing cultural anxieties. 754 - - Respondents judged interracial daters not just by race but by **projected cultural assimilation or rejection**. 755 -{{/expandable}} 756 - 757 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 758 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 759 - - Reveals **latent racial boundaries** in contemporary dating preferences. 760 - - Uses **controlled experimental design** to expose socially unacceptable but real biases. 761 - 762 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 763 - - Relies on **self-reported reactions to profiles**, not real-world dating behavior. 764 - - **Fails to analyze anti-White framing** in the assumptions about White participants who prefer other races. 765 - - Assumes stigma is irrational without investigating **rational in-group preference or cultural concerns**. 766 - 767 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 768 - - Include **reverse scenarios** (e.g., Black or Latino individuals expressing preference for Whites). 769 - - Examine how **media portrayal of interracial couples** influences perception and desirability. 770 - - Account for **class and education overlaps** that could explain perceived traits. 771 -{{/expandable}} 772 - 773 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 774 -- Highlights how **Whites who date outside their race—particularly with Blacks—are pathologized**, even within their own community. 775 -- Shows that **Whiteness is penalized** when paired with non-Whiteness, reinforcing social costs for racial mixing. 776 -- Useful for understanding **how stigma around interracial relationships is unevenly applied**, with anti-White moral overtones. 777 -{{/expandable}} 778 - 779 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 780 -1. Study how **in-group dating preferences differ across races** and are morally interpreted. 781 -2. Investigate how **class and education** affect perceptions of interracial relationships. 782 -3. Examine whether **Whites are disproportionately judged** when deviating from group norms vs. other races. 783 -{{/expandable}} 784 - 785 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 786 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1177_2332649219871232.pdf]] 787 -{{/expandable}} 788 -{{/expandable}} 789 - 790 - 791 -{{expandable summary="Study: E Pluribus, Pauciores (Out of Many, Fewer): Diversity and Birth Rates"}} 792 -**Source:** *National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)* 793 -**Date of Publication:** *2024* 794 -**Author(s):** *Umit Gurun, Daniel Solomon* 795 -**Title:** *"E Pluribus, Pauciores (Out of Many, Fewer): Diversity and Birth Rates"* 796 -**DOI:** [10.3386/w31978](https://doi.org/10.3386/w31978) 797 -**Subject Matter:** *Demography, Social Cohesion, Diversity Effects on Fertility* 798 - 799 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 800 -1. **General Observations:** 801 - - Used large-scale demographic, economic, and census data across **1,800+ U.S. counties**. 802 - - Found a **strong negative correlation between local diversity and White fertility rates**. 803 - - Quantified impact: a 1 SD increase in ethnic diversity leads to a **4–6% drop in birth rates**. 804 - 805 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 806 - - Decline most pronounced among **non-Hispanic Whites**, especially in suburban and semi-urban areas. 807 - - **No significant birth rate drop observed among Hispanic or Black populations** under the same conditions. 808 - 809 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 810 - - Diversity increases linked to **reduced marriage rates**, especially among Whites. 811 - - Authors suggest **“erosion of social cohesion and trust”** as mediating factors. 812 -{{/expandable}} 813 - 814 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 566 +## **Findings** 815 815 1. **Primary Observations:** 816 - - Et hnicdiversity significantly**reducestotal fertilityrates**, independentofeconomicoreducationalvariables.817 - - ** Social fragmentation** andperceiveddissimilaritydrive fertilitysuppression.568 + - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**. 569 + - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences. 818 818 819 819 2. **Subgroup Trends:** 820 - - Whitepopulationsrespond to diversitywith lowerfamilyformation.821 - - ** Cultural distance**andlossofsharednormsarepossibleauses.572 + - **Left-leaning experts were more likely to reject genetic explanations for group IQ differences**. 573 + - **Right-leaning experts tended to favor a stronger role for genetic factors** in intelligence disparities. 822 822 823 823 3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 824 - - High-diversity metro areas saw steepest declines in White birth rates over the past two decades. 825 - - Study challenges mainstream assumptions that diversity has neutral or positive demographic effects. 826 -{{/expandable}} 576 + - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions. 577 + - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues. 827 827 828 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 829 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 830 - - Offers **quantitative backing for claims long treated as taboo** in public discourse. 831 - - Applies **robust statistical methods** and cross-validates with multiple data sources. 579 +--- 832 832 833 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 834 - - Avoids discussing **racial preference, ethnic tension, or cultural conflict** explicitly. 835 - - Authors stop short of acknowledging **the demographic replacement implication** of sustained low White fertility. 836 - 837 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 838 - - Include **qualitative data on reasons for delayed or avoided parenthood** among Whites in diverse areas. 839 - - Examine **media messaging and policy environments** that could accelerate these trends. 840 -{{/expandable}} 841 - 842 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 843 -- Confirms a **central premise** of the White demographic decline thesis. 844 -- Demonstrates that **diversity is not neutral** but **functionally suppressive to White reproduction**. 845 -- Offers solid **empirical support against the utopian assumptions** of multiculturalism. 846 -{{/expandable}} 847 - 848 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 849 -1. Examine **fertility effects of diversity in European countries** experiencing immigration-driven change. 850 -2. Study **how school demographics and crime perception** affect reproductive decision-making. 851 -3. Explore **policy frameworks that support demographic stability for founding populations**. 852 -{{/expandable}} 853 - 854 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 855 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:12.Gurun_Solomon_Diversity_BirthRates.pdf]] 856 -{{/expandable}} 857 -{{/expandable}} 858 - 859 - 860 -{{expandable summary="Study: The White Man’s Burden: Gonzo Pornography and the Construction of Black Masculinity"}} 861 -**Source:** *Porn Studies* 862 -**Date of Publication:** *2015* 863 -**Author(s):** *Noah Tsika* 864 -**Title:** *"The White Man’s Burden: Gonzo Pornography and the Construction of Black Masculinity"* 865 -**DOI:** [10.1080/23268743.2015.1025389](https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2015.1025389) 866 -**Subject Matter:** *Pornography Studies, Race and Sexuality, Cultural Critique* 867 - 868 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 869 -1. **General Observations:** 870 - - This is a **qualitative content analysis** of gonzo pornography, particularly interracial porn involving Black men and White women. 871 - - The author reviews **select films, not a dataset**, using them to extrapolate broad cultural claims about race and sexuality. 872 - 873 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 874 - - Claims that **interracial porn “others” and dehumanizes Black men**, yet selectively **frames Black male sexual aggression as liberatory**. 875 - - The author accuses White male consumers of **fetishizing Black men** as both threats and tools for their own “colonial guilt.” 876 - 877 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 878 - - No empirical evidence, just interpretive readings of scenes and film dialogue. 879 - - Repeatedly criticizes **White directors and actors** as complicit in perpetuating “White supremacy through porn.” 880 -{{/expandable}} 881 - 882 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 883 -1. **Primary Observations:** 884 - - Argues that **gonzo interracial porn functions as racial propaganda**, reinforcing White guilt while commodifying Black masculinity. 885 - - Portrays White women as willing participants in a fantasy of racial domination that allegedly “liberates” Black men. 886 - 887 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 888 - - White male viewers are pathologized as both sexually repressed and voyeuristically complicit in anti-Black racism. 889 - - Black male performers are framed as both victims of racial commodification and **agents of resistance through hypersexuality**. 890 - 891 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 892 - - Cites scenes where Black male actors degrade or dominate White women as **“transgressive acts” that destabilize White power**, rather than examples of racial hostility or objectification. 893 - - The narrative treats **racially charged sexual violence as deconstructive**, only when it reverses traditional racial dynamics. 894 -{{/expandable}} 895 - 896 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 581 +## **Critique and Observations** 897 897 1. **Strengths of the Study:** 898 - - Useful in showcasing how**criticalraceheoryinvadeseventhe mostapoliticaldomains**(porn consumption)and turns themintorace war battlegrounds.899 - - Offers insight into how**Whiteheterosexualityisrecoded as colonialism**in activist academia.583 + - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date. 584 + - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**. 900 900 901 901 2. **Limitations of the Study:** 902 - - **No statistical basis**, relies entirely on biased interpretive analysis of fringe media. 903 - - Presumes **intent and audience motivation** without surveys, viewership data, or cross-cultural comparison. 904 - - Treats Black aggression as empowering and White sexuality as inherently oppressive — a double standard. 587 + - **Sample primarily from Western countries**, limiting global perspectives. 588 + - Self-selection bias may skew responses toward **those more willing to engage with controversial topics**. 905 905 906 906 3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 907 - - Include comparative data on how different racial groups are portrayed in pornography across genres. 908 - - Analyze how **minority-run porn studios frame interracial themes** — not just White-directed media. 909 - - Address how racial fetishization **harms all groups**, not just Black men. 910 -{{/expandable}} 591 + - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**. 592 + - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**. 911 911 912 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 913 -- Exemplifies how **racialized sexual narratives are reinterpreted to indict White identity**, even in consumer entertainment. 914 -- Shows how **DEI and CRT frameworks are applied to pornographic material** to pathologize White maleness while sanctifying non-White hypermasculinity. 915 -- Highlights the **academic bias that treats transgressive content as empowering when it serves anti-White narratives**. 916 -{{/expandable}} 594 +--- 917 917 918 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 919 -1. Study how **interracial porn narratives differ when produced by non-White vs. White directors**. 920 -2. Examine **how racial power is portrayed in same-sex vs. heterosexual interracial porn**. 921 -3. Investigate whether the **fetishization of Black masculinity fuels unrealistic expectations and destructive stereotypes** for both Black and White men. 922 -{{/expandable}} 596 +## **Relevance to Subproject** 597 +- Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**. 598 +- Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science. 599 +- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research. 923 923 924 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 925 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:Dinest - The White Man's Burden Gonzo Pornography and the Construction of Black Masculinity.pdf]] 926 -{{/expandable}} 927 -{{/expandable}} 601 +--- 928 928 603 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration** 604 +1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence. 605 +2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**. 606 +3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings. 929 929 930 -{{expandable summary="Study: Gendered Racial Exclusion Among White Internet Daters"}} 931 -**Source:** *Social Science Research* 932 -**Date of Publication:** *2009* 933 -**Author(s):** *Cynthia Feliciano, Belinda Robnett, Golnaz Komaie* 934 -**Title:** *"Gendered Racial Exclusion Among White Internet Daters"* 935 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.04.004](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.04.004) 936 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Dating, Racial Preferences, CRT Framing of White Intimacy* 608 +--- 937 937 938 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 939 -1. **General Observations:** 940 - - Based on data from **Love@aol.com**, analyzing **over 6,000 profiles** from California. 941 - - The study investigated **racial preferences listed explicitly** in dating profiles. 610 +## **Summary of Research Study** 611 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**. 942 942 943 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 944 - - **White women were least likely to express openness to interracial dating**, particularly with Black and Asian men. 945 - - **White men also showed exclusion**, but were more open than White women. 613 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis. 946 946 947 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 948 - - The authors labeled preference for one’s own race as **“racial exclusion”**. 949 - - Profiles by non-White users expressing same-race preferences were **not similarly problematized**. 950 -{{/expandable}} 615 +--- 951 951 952 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 953 -1. **Primary Observations:** 954 - - **White in-group preference was framed as discriminatory**, regardless of intent or context. 955 - - Dating preferences were interpreted as a **“reinforcement of racial hierarchies”**. 617 +## **📄 Download Full Study** 618 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]] 956 956 957 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 958 - - The study suggested **White women’s selectivity** stemmed from **cultural and structural advantages**, implying racial gatekeeping. 959 - - Did not critically examine **non-White preferences** for their own race. 620 +{{/expand}} 960 960 961 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 962 - - Highlighted that **Latina and Asian women were more open to White men** than to men of their own ethnicity, which was not treated as exclusionary. 963 - - **No racial preference was criticized except when it protected White boundaries.** 964 -{{/expandable}} 622 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}} 965 965 966 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 967 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 968 - - Large dataset from real-world dating profiles. 969 - - Provides rare insight into **gendered patterns of racial preference**. 624 +{{expand title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications" expanded="false"}} 625 +**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)* 626 +**Date of Publication:** *2010* 627 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley* 628 +**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"* 629 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046) 630 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 970 970 971 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 972 - - **Frames personal preference as political discrimination** when expressed by White users. 973 - - **Fails to control for cultural compatibility, attraction patterns, or religious values.** 974 - - **Double standard** in analysis — **non-White selectivity is ignored or justified.** 632 +--- 975 975 976 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 977 - - Should distinguish **racial animus from in-group preference**. 978 - - Include **psychological, aesthetic, and cultural compatibility data**. 979 - - Apply **equal critical lens to all racial groups**, not just Whites. 980 -{{/expandable}} 981 - 982 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 983 -- Reinforces how CRT-aligned research pathologizes **White in-group dating preferences**. 984 -- Supports the claim that **White intimacy boundaries are uniquely scrutinized** and politicized. 985 -- Demonstrates how even non-political behavior (e.g., dating) is racialized when it involves Whites. 986 -{{/expandable}} 987 - 988 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 989 -1. Study how **dating preferences vary by upbringing, media influence, and culture**, not just race. 990 -2. Analyze **racial preferences across all groups** with equal rigor and skepticism. 991 -3. Examine the **mental health impact of stigmatizing in-group preference** among Whites. 992 -{{/expandable}} 993 - 994 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 995 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.ssresearch.2009.04.004.pdf]] 996 -{{/expandable}} 997 -{{/expandable}} 998 - 999 - 1000 -{{expandable summary="Study: Black Penis and the Demoralization of the Western World"}} 1001 -**Source:** *Journal of European Psychoanalysis* 1002 -**Date of Publication:** *2009* 1003 -**Author(s):** *Kristen Fink* *Jewish*)) 1004 -**Title:** *"Black Penis and the Demoralization of the Western World: Sexual relationships between black men and white women as a cause of decline"* 1005 -**DOI:** *Unavailable – Psychoanalytic essay publication* 1006 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sexuality, Psychoanalysis, Cultural Demoralization* 1007 - 1008 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 634 +## **Key Statistics** 1009 1009 1. **General Observations:** 1010 - - This is a **psychoanalytic essay**, not an empirical study. 1011 - - Uses **Freudian and Lacanian theory** to explore symbolic meanings of interracial sex. 1012 - - Frames **Black male–White female pairings** as psychologically disruptive to the White male ego and Western civilization. 636 + - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species. 637 + - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans. 1013 1013 1014 1014 2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 1015 - - Positions **Blackmenassymbolicrivals**toemasculatedWestern(White) men.1016 - - **Whitewomen’sinterracial attraction**isframedasrebellionorrejectionofWesternorder.640 + - Discusses **four primary definitions of race/subspecies**: Essentialist, Taxonomic, Population-based, and Lineage-based. 641 + - Suggests that **human heterozygosity levels are comparable to species that are classified as polytypic**. 1017 1017 1018 1018 3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 1019 - - The essay proposes that **sexual representation in media** is demoralizing to White culture. 1020 - - Uses **high theory language** to justify what is ultimately an anti-White cultural narrative. 1021 -{{/expandable}} 644 + - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species. 645 + - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation. 1022 1022 1023 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 1024 -1. **Primary Observations:** 1025 - - **Interracial sexual dynamics** are framed as central to **Western decline**. 1026 - - **White masculinity is portrayed as passive, obsolete, or neurotic** in contrast to hypermasculinized Blackness. 647 +--- 1027 1027 1028 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 1029 - - Suggests White men internalize emasculation through exposure to interracial symbolism. 1030 - - Sees **cultural loss of confidence** in White society as stemming from racial-sexual symbolism. 1031 - 1032 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 1033 - - Analyzes media tropes (e.g., interracial porn, pop culture) through the lens of psychoanalytic guilt and transgression. 1034 - - Never critiques the **ideological project of glorifying Blackness at the expense of White identity**. 1035 -{{/expandable}} 1036 - 1037 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 1038 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 1039 - - Reveals how **elite academic disciplines like psychoanalysis** are used to mask anti-White narratives in esoteric jargon. 1040 - - Serves as **ideological evidence** of demoralization tactics embedded in cultural theory. 1041 - 1042 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 1043 - - No empirical data, surveys, or statistical analysis — purely speculative. 1044 - - **Does not critique hypersexualization of Black men** or the dehumanizing aspects of the fetish. 1045 - - Assumes **White masculinity must passively accept its symbolic erasure** as psychoanalytically “natural.” 1046 - 1047 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 1048 - - Include **perspectives from White men and women** on how these portrayals affect their psychological well-being. 1049 - - Disentangle psychoanalytic theory from **racial guilt ideology**. 1050 - - Explore **mutual respect-based frameworks** for interracial dynamics rather than ones rooted in humiliation or power symbolism. 1051 -{{/expandable}} 1052 - 1053 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 1054 -- Illustrates how **race, sex, and culture are manipulated to undermine White self-perception**. 1055 -- Demonstrates how **academic elites frame White decline as psychologically necessary or deserved**. 1056 -- Provides ideological background for modern media trends that eroticize racial power imbalance. 1057 -{{/expandable}} 1058 - 1059 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 1060 -1. Analyze how psychoanalytic language is used to **justify racial inversion in cultural dominance**. 1061 -2. Examine the **role of pornography in demoralization campaigns** targeting White men. 1062 -3. Explore how elite journals create **ideological cover for overt anti-White sentiment**. 1063 -{{/expandable}} 1064 - 1065 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 1066 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.Fink_Black_Penis_Demoralization.pdf]] 1067 -{{/expandable}} 1068 -{{/expandable}} 1069 - 1070 - 1071 -{{expandable summary="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}} 1072 -**Source:** *JAMA Network Open* 1073 -**Date of Publication:** *2020* 1074 -**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.* 1075 -**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"* 1076 -**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833) 1077 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 1078 - 1079 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 1080 -1. **General Observations:** 1081 - - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data. 1082 - - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults. 1083 - 1084 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 1085 - - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**. 1086 - - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency. 1087 - 1088 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 1089 - - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period. 1090 - - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates. 1091 -{{/expandable}} 1092 - 1093 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 649 +## **Findings** 1094 1094 1. **Primary Observations:** 1095 - - Asignificant decline insexualfrequency,especiallyamong**younger men**.1096 - - Shifts inrelationship dynamics andeconomicstressorsmay contribute to the trend.651 + - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**. 652 + - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity. 1097 1097 1098 1098 2. **Subgroup Trends:** 1099 - - Morepronounceddeclineamong **unmarriedindividuals**.1100 - - Nojorchangeobservedfor**marriedadults**overtime.655 + - Discusses **how race concepts evolved over time** in biological sciences. 656 + - Compares **human diversity with that of other primates** such as chimpanzees and gorillas. 1101 1101 1102 1102 3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 1103 - - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity. 1104 - - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors. 1105 -{{/expandable}} 659 + - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**. 660 + - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**. 1106 1106 1107 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 1108 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 1109 - - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset. 1110 - - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time. 662 +--- 1111 1111 1112 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 1113 - - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**. 1114 - - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity. 1115 - 1116 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 1117 - - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts. 1118 - - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration. 1119 -{{/expandable}} 1120 - 1121 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 1122 -- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions. 1123 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors. 1124 -{{/expandable}} 1125 - 1126 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 1127 -1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics. 1128 -2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends. 1129 -{{/expandable}} 1130 - 1131 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 1132 - 1133 -{{/expandable}} 1134 -{{/expandable}} 1135 - 1136 -{{expandable summary="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}} 1137 -**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica* 1138 -**Date of Publication:** *2012* 1139 -**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births* 1140 -**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"* 1141 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x) 1142 -**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 1143 - 1144 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 1145 -1. **General Observations:** 1146 - - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies. 1147 - - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples. 1148 - 1149 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 1150 - - **Maternal race had a stronger influence than paternal race** on birth outcomes. 1151 - - **Black mother–White father (BMWF) couples** had a higher risk than **White mother–Black father (WMBF) couples**. 1152 - 1153 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 1154 - - **Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for key outcomes:** 1155 - - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08). 1156 - - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78). 1157 - - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85). 1158 -{{/expandable}} 1159 - 1160 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 1161 -1. **Primary Observations:** 1162 - - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples. 1163 - - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes. 1164 - 1165 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 1166 - - **Black mothers (regardless of paternal race) had the highest risk of LBW and PTB**. 1167 - - **White mothers with Black fathers had a lower risk** than Black mothers with White fathers. 1168 - 1169 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 1170 - - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers. 1171 - - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes. 1172 -{{/expandable}} 1173 - 1174 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 664 +## **Critique and Observations** 1175 1175 1. **Strengths of the Study:** 1176 - - ** Largestmeta-analysis** onracial disparitiesinbirthoutcomes.1177 - - Uses**adjustedstatisticalmodels**to accountforconfoundingvariables.666 + - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification. 667 + - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments. 1178 1178 1179 1179 2. **Limitations of the Study:** 1180 - - Dataimitedto**Black-Whitebiracialcouples**,excludingotherracialgroups.1181 - - ** Socioeconomicandhealthcareaccessfactors**notfully explored.670 + - Controversial topic with **strong opposing views in anthropology and genetics**. 671 + - **Relies on broad genetic trends**, but does not analyze individual-level genetic variation in depth. 1182 1182 1183 1183 3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 1184 - - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**. 1185 - - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**. 1186 -{{/expandable}} 674 + - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications. 675 + - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**. 1187 1187 1188 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 1189 -- Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health. 1190 -- Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**. 1191 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes. 1192 -{{/expandable}} 677 +--- 1193 1193 1194 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 1195 -1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**. 1196 -2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**. 1197 -3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**. 1198 -{{/expandable}} 679 +## **Relevance to Subproject** 680 +- Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**. 681 +- Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**. 682 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**. 1199 1199 1200 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 1201 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]] 1202 -{{/expandable}} 1203 -{{/expandable}} 684 +--- 1204 1204 1205 -{{expandable summary="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}} 1206 -**Source:** *Current Psychology* 1207 -**Date of Publication:** *2024* 1208 -**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver* 1209 -**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"* 1210 -**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z) 1211 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 686 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration** 687 +1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**. 688 +2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**. 689 +3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**. 1212 1212 1213 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 1214 -1. **General Observations:** 1215 - - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**. 1216 - - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels. 691 +--- 1217 1217 1218 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 1219 - - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**. 1220 - - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels. 693 +## **Summary of Research Study** 694 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**. 1221 1221 1222 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 1223 - - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis. 1224 - - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification. 1225 -{{/expandable}} 696 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis. 1226 1226 1227 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 1228 -1. **Primary Observations:** 1229 - - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**. 1230 - - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**. 698 +--- 1231 1231 1232 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 1233 - - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity. 1234 - - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels. 700 +## **📄 Download Full Study** 701 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]] 1235 1235 1236 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 1237 - - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing. 1238 - - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation. 1239 -{{/expandable}} 703 +{{/expand}} 1240 1240 1241 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 1242 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 1243 - - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health. 1244 - - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures. 705 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}} 1245 1245 1246 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 1247 - - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels. 1248 - - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research. 707 +{{expand title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age" expanded="false"}} 708 +**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)* 709 +**Date of Publication:** *2013* 710 +**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.* 711 +**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"* 712 +**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54) 713 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 1249 1249 1250 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 1251 - - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**. 1252 - - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration. 1253 -{{/expandable}} 715 +--- 1254 1254 1255 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 1256 -- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community. 1257 -- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**. 1258 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**. 1259 -{{/expandable}} 1260 - 1261 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 1262 -1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health. 1263 -2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels. 1264 -3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation. 1265 -{{/expandable}} 1266 - 1267 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 1268 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]] 1269 -{{/expandable}} 1270 -{{/expandable}} 1271 - 1272 -= Crime and Substance Abuse = 1273 - 1274 -{{expandable summary="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}} 1275 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse* 1276 -**Date of Publication:** *2002* 1277 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti* 1278 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"* 1279 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424) 1280 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 1281 - 1282 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 717 +## **Key Statistics** 1283 1283 1. **General Observations:** 1284 - - Studyexamined**drugtreatmentcourtsuccessrates** amongfirst-time offenders.1285 - - Strongestpredictors of**successfulcompletion wereemploymentstatus andrace**.719 + - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**. 720 + - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**. 1286 1286 1287 1287 2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 1288 - - Individualswith**stablejobs weremorelikelytocomplete the program**.1289 - - **Blackparticipants had lowersuccessrates**,suggestingpotentialsystemicdisparities.723 + - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**. 724 + - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**. 1290 1290 1291 1291 3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 1292 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion. 1293 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**. 1294 -{{/expandable}} 727 + - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings. 728 + - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**. 1295 1295 1296 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 1297 -1. **Primary Observations:** 1298 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success. 1299 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates. 730 +--- 1300 1300 1301 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 1302 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders. 1303 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**. 1304 - 1305 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 1306 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**. 1307 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**. 1308 -{{/expandable}} 1309 - 1310 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 1311 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 1312 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**. 1313 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis. 1314 - 1315 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 1316 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**. 1317 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**. 1318 - 1319 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 1320 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**. 1321 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**. 1322 -{{/expandable}} 1323 - 1324 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 1325 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**. 1326 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**. 1327 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**. 1328 -{{/expandable}} 1329 - 1330 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 1331 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**. 1332 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**. 1333 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**. 1334 -{{/expandable}} 1335 - 1336 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 1337 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]] 1338 -{{/expandable}} 1339 -{{/expandable}} 1340 - 1341 -{{expandable summary="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}} 1342 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse* 1343 -**Date of Publication:** *2003* 1344 -**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman* 1345 -**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"* 1346 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394) 1347 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 1348 - 1349 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 1350 -1. **General Observations:** 1351 - - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**. 1352 - - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups. 1353 - 1354 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 1355 - - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents. 1356 - - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy. 1357 - 1358 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 1359 - - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**. 1360 - - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents. 1361 -{{/expandable}} 1362 - 1363 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 732 +## **Findings** 1364 1364 1. **Primary Observations:** 1365 - - Racial/ethnicdisparitiesin**substanceusereportingbias survey-basedresearch**.1366 - - **Socialdesirabilityandulturalnormsimpactdatareliability**.734 + - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models. 735 + - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**. 1367 1367 1368 1368 2. **Subgroup Trends:** 1369 - - White respondentswere**morelikelytooverreport** substanceuse.1370 - - Black andLatino respondents **had higherrecantationrates**,particularlyin face-to-face interviews.738 + - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**. 739 + - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**. 1371 1371 1372 1372 3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 1373 - - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**. 1374 - - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**. 1375 -{{/expandable}} 742 + - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age. 743 + - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**. 1376 1376 1377 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 745 +--- 746 + 747 +## **Critique and Observations** 1378 1378 1. **Strengths of the Study:** 1379 - - ** Comprehensivereviewof 36 studies**onmeasurementerrorin substanceusereporting.1380 - - Identifies**systemic biasesaffecting racial/ethnicurveyreliability**.749 + - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**. 750 + - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence. 1381 1381 1382 1382 2. **Limitations of the Study:** 1383 - - Relies on**secondarydataanalysis**, limitingdirectexperimentalcontrol.1384 - - Doesnotexplore**howmeasurementerrorimpacts policydecisions**.753 + - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability. 754 + - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time. 1385 1385 1386 1386 3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 1387 - - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative). 1388 - - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**. 1389 -{{/expandable}} 757 + - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**. 758 + - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency. 1390 1390 1391 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 1392 -- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**. 1393 -- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**. 1394 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**. 1395 -{{/expandable}} 760 +--- 1396 1396 1397 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 1398 -1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**. 1399 -2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**. 1400 -3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**. 1401 -{{/expandable}} 762 +## **Relevance to Subproject** 763 +- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**. 764 +- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**. 765 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**. 1402 1402 1403 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 1404 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]] 1405 -{{/expandable}} 1406 -{{/expandable}} 767 +--- 1407 1407 1408 -{{expandable summary="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}} 1409 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse* 1410 -**Date of Publication:** *2002* 1411 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti* 1412 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"* 1413 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424) 1414 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 769 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration** 770 +1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**. 771 +2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**. 772 +3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**. 1415 1415 1416 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 1417 -1. **General Observations:** 1418 - - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders. 1419 - - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**. 774 +--- 1420 1420 1421 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 1422 - - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**. 1423 - - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities. 776 +## **Summary of Research Study** 777 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**. 1424 1424 1425 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 1426 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion. 1427 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**. 1428 -{{/expandable}} 779 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis. 1429 1429 1430 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 1431 -1. **Primary Observations:** 1432 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success. 1433 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates. 781 +--- 1434 1434 1435 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 1436 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders. 1437 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**. 783 +## **📄 Download Full Study** 784 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]] 1438 1438 1439 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 1440 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**. 1441 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**. 1442 -{{/expandable}} 786 +{{/expand}} 1443 1443 1444 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 1445 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 1446 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**. 1447 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis. 788 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}} 1448 1448 1449 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 1450 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**. 1451 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**. 790 +{{expand title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports" expanded="false"}} 791 +**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education* 792 +**Date of Publication:** *2019* 793 +**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum* 794 +**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"* 795 +**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140) 796 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 1452 1452 1453 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 1454 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**. 1455 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**. 1456 -{{/expandable}} 798 +--- 1457 1457 1458 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 1459 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**. 1460 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**. 1461 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**. 1462 -{{/expandable}} 1463 - 1464 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 1465 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**. 1466 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**. 1467 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**. 1468 -{{/expandable}} 1469 - 1470 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 1471 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]] 1472 -{{/expandable}} 1473 -{{/expandable}} 1474 - 1475 -{{expandable summary=" 1476 - 1477 -Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}} 1478 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)* 1479 -**Date of Publication:** *2014* 1480 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy* 1481 -**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"* 1482 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012) 1483 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 1484 - 1485 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 800 +## **Key Statistics** 1486 1486 1. **General Observations:** 1487 - - Thestudyexaminesreaction timedatafrom**13age-matchedstudies**spanning**1884–2004**.1488 - - Resultssuggestanestimated **declineof13.35 IQ points**overthisperiod.802 + - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports. 803 + - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**. 1489 1489 1490 1490 2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 1491 - - The study found**slowerreactionmesin modernpopulations**compared to Victorian-era individuals.1492 - - Data from**Westerncountries(US, UK, Canada, Australia,Finland)**were analyzed.806 + - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics. 807 + - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds. 1493 1493 1494 1494 3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 1495 - - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**. 1496 - - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**. 1497 -{{/expandable}} 810 + - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers. 811 + - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities. 1498 1498 1499 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 813 +--- 814 + 815 +## **Findings** 1500 1500 1. **Primary Observations:** 1501 - - Supports thehypothesisof**intelligencedeclinedue to genetic andenvironmentalfactors**.1502 - - Reactiontime,a**biomarkerfor cognitiveability**,has slowedsignificantlyover time.817 + - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities. 818 + - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture. 1503 1503 1504 1504 2. **Subgroup Trends:** 1505 - - A stronger**correlation betweenslowerreaction time andlowergeneralintelligence(g)**.1506 - - Flynneffect(IQ gains)doesotcontradictthis finding,asreaction time isa **biological, not environmental,measure**.821 + - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports. 822 + - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams. 1507 1507 1508 1508 3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 1509 - - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**. 1510 - - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute. 1511 -{{/expandable}} 825 + - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education. 826 + - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**. 1512 1512 1513 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 828 +--- 829 + 830 +## **Critique and Observations** 1514 1514 1. **Strengths of the Study:** 1515 - - **Comprehensive meta-analysis**coveringovernturyof reactiontimedata.1516 - - ** Robuststatistical corrections**for measurementvariancebetween historicalandmodernstudies.832 + - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports. 833 + - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics. 1517 1517 1518 1518 2. **Limitations of the Study:** 1519 - - Somehistoricaldatasources**lackmethodologicalconsistency**.1520 - - **Reactiontimemeasurementsaryby study**, requiringadjustmentsforequipmentdifferences.836 + - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions. 837 + - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics. 1521 1521 1522 1522 3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 1523 - - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**. 1524 - - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time. 1525 -{{/expandable}} 840 + - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**. 841 + - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**. 1526 1526 1527 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 1528 -- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**. 1529 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**. 1530 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**. 1531 -{{/expandable}} 843 +--- 1532 1532 1533 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 1534 -1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline. 1535 -2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**. 1536 -3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**. 1537 -{{/expandable}} 845 +## **Relevance to Subproject** 846 +- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment. 847 +- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics. 848 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**. 1538 1538 1539 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 1540 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]] 1541 -{{/expandable}} 1542 -{{/expandable}} 850 +--- 1543 1543 1544 -= Whiteness & White Guilt = 852 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration** 853 +1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**. 854 +2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**. 855 +3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**. 1545 1545 1546 -{{expandable summary="Study: Reducing Implicit Racial Preferences: I. A Comparative Investigation of 17 Interventions"}} 1547 -**Source:** *Psychological Science* 1548 -**Date of Publication:** *2014* 1549 -**Author(s):** *Caleb E. Lai, Anthony G. Greenwald, et al.* 1550 -**Title:** *"Reducing Implicit Racial Preferences: I. A Comparative Investigation of 17 Interventions"* 1551 -**DOI:** [10.1177/0956797614535812](https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614535812) 1552 -**Subject Matter:** *Implicit Bias, Racial Psychology, Psychological Conditioning* 857 +--- 1553 1553 1554 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 1555 -1. **General Observations:** 1556 - - Tested **17 different interventions** across **6,321 participants**, all measured via IAT (Implicit Association Test). 1557 - - Focused exclusively on reducing **pro-White, anti-Black preferences** — no reciprocal testing on anti-White bias. 859 +## **Summary of Research Study** 860 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**. 1558 1558 1559 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 1560 - - Educational and exposure-based interventions (e.g., multiculturalism, egalitarian messaging) failed to reduce bias significantly. 1561 - - Most effective short-term results came from **trauma-based or emotionally coercive interventions**. 862 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis. 1562 1562 1563 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 1564 - - The **"Black hero" intervention**, where participants imagined being violently attacked by a White man and rescued by a Black man, was among the most effective. 1565 - - Effects of even the most extreme interventions **dissipated within 24–72 hours**, with no long-term behavioral change. 1566 -{{/expandable}} 864 +--- 1567 1567 1568 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 1569 -1. **Primary Observations:** 1570 - - The interventions that produced the most dramatic IAT changes used **emotionally graphic narratives** depicting Whites as violent aggressors and Blacks as saviors. 1571 - - Merely showing positive Black images or promoting egalitarian values had minimal effect on implicit associations. 866 +## **📄 Download Full Study** 867 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]] 1572 1572 1573 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 1574 - - In the **"Black hero" condition**, participants were asked to imagine being physically beaten by a White person and then rescued by a Black person — an intentionally vivid and disturbing scenario. 1575 - - The **"Black victim" intervention** relied on emotionally shocking imagery of anti-Black violence (e.g., lynching) to induce guilt and disrupt positive associations with Whiteness. 869 +{{/expand}} 1576 1576 1577 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 1578 - - None of the scenarios reversed the framing (e.g., Black aggressor/White victim), confirming the ideological goal was **to degrade White identity**, not merely reduce bias. 1579 - - The study was **cited by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)** to justify DEI-aligned policy recommendations. 1580 -{{/expandable}} 871 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}} 1581 1581 1582 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 1583 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 1584 - - Large sample size and systematic comparison across diverse intervention types. 1585 - - Clearly shows that **implicit preference is resilient** and not easily changed by education or exposure alone. 873 +{{expand title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History" expanded="false"}} 874 +**Source:** *Nature* 875 +**Date of Publication:** *2009* 876 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh* 877 +**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"* 878 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365) 879 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 1586 1586 1587 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 1588 - - The most “effective” methods **relied on emotional manipulation, not persuasion or evidence**. 1589 - - Assumes **natural in-group preference is pathological** when expressed by White subjects but makes no effort to test other groups. 1590 - - **Zero attention to pro-Black or anti-White bias** — only White attitudes are pathologized. 881 +--- 1591 1591 1592 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 1593 - - Test the **psychological harm** and ethical implications of using graphic racial trauma to coerce attitude change. 1594 - - Include interventions that **strengthen ingroup empathy** without demonizing other groups. 1595 - - Disaggregate bias by **class, region, and individual experience**, rather than racially reducing all bias to “Whiteness.” 1596 -{{/expandable}} 1597 - 1598 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 1599 -- Provides direct evidence that **DEI-style implicit bias training** is based on emotionally abusive and **anti-White psychological framing**. 1600 -- Shows how **social science selectively targets Whites for attitude correction**, often using fictionalized racial trauma scenarios. 1601 -- Demonstrates that even extreme interventions **fail to achieve long-term change**, undermining the scientific justification for such policies. 1602 -{{/expandable}} 1603 - 1604 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 1605 -1. Investigate **implicit bias training outcomes** in real-world institutional settings. 1606 -2. Study **the ethical limits of psychological reprogramming** in DEI policies. 1607 -3. Explore **natural ingroup preference across all races** using morally neutral frameworks. 1608 -{{/expandable}} 1609 - 1610 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 1611 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:lai2014.pdf]] 1612 -{{/expandable}} 1613 -{{/expandable}} 1614 - 1615 - 1616 -{{expandable summary="Study: School Choice Is Not Enough: The Impact of Critical Social Justice Ideology in American Education"}} 1617 -**Source:** *Social Science Research Network (SSRN)* 1618 -**Date of Publication:** *2020* 1619 -**Author(s):** *Eric Kaufmann, David Goldberg* 1620 -**Title:** *"School Choice Is Not Enough: The Impact of Critical Social Justice Ideology in American Education"* 1621 -**DOI:** [10.2139/ssrn.3730517](https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3730517) 1622 -**Subject Matter:** *K–12 Education, CRT, Indoctrination, Teacher Training* 1623 - 1624 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 883 +## **Key Statistics** 1625 1625 1. **General Observations:** 1626 - - Su rveyed**over 800 educators** andanalyzed **curricula,training materials,andadministratorcommunications**.1627 - - Found that**CSJ ideologyis deeplyembedded inpublic schoolsystems**, includingcharterandmagnetschools.885 + - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**. 886 + - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**. 1628 1628 1629 1629 2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 1630 - - Teachersreportedbeing trained tobelieve**Whiteness= privilege+ harm**, notjust historical context.1631 - - A dministratorsdisproportionately**disciplinedorsuppresseddissentingWhite teachers or parents**.889 + - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**. 890 + - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**. 1632 1632 1633 1633 3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 1634 - - **Majority of educators fear retribution** if they question CSJ orthodoxy. 1635 - - **Curriculum mandates racial self-critique** primarily for White students, often starting in elementary grades. 1636 -{{/expandable}} 893 + - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups. 894 + - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation. 1637 1637 1638 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 896 +--- 897 + 898 +## **Findings** 1639 1639 1. **Primary Observations:** 1640 - - CSJideology**functionsasanimplicit worldview**, notutralteaching tool.1641 - - “Equity”in practicemeans**dismantlingofperceived White dominance**, oftenthroughemotionalmanipulationof students.900 + - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**. 901 + - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India. 1642 1642 1643 1643 2. **Subgroup Trends:** 1644 - - Whitestudentsand teachersreport**feelingtargeted ordehumanized**indiversity sessions.1645 - - Minoritystudentswereoften**placedin victim-centricidentityframeworks**,reinforcing grievancepolitics.904 + - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**. 905 + - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**. 1646 1646 1647 1647 3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 1648 - - In several documented districts, **student activities included “unlearning Whiteness” workshops**. 1649 - - One district mandated that teachers **“de-center White perspectives”** in all classroom subjects. 1650 -{{/expandable}} 908 + - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups. 909 + - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation. 1651 1651 1652 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 911 +--- 912 + 913 +## **Critique and Observations** 1653 1653 1. **Strengths of the Study:** 1654 - - One ofthefew empiricalstudiesdocumenting**systemicideologicalbias ineducation**.1655 - - Strong evidentiary basedrawnfrom**firsthand educatortestimony**andtrainingmaterials.915 + - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history. 916 + - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**. 1656 1656 1657 1657 2. **Limitations of the Study:** 1658 - - Studyis basedon**self-reportedperceptions**,thoughmanyaresubstantiatedwithexamples.1659 - - FocusisprimarilyU.S.-centric;international parallelsnotexplored.919 + - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**. 920 + - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era. 1660 1660 1661 1661 3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 1662 - - Future studies could **quantify the academic and emotional impact** on White students. 1663 - - Comparative analysis with **non-CSJ schools** (e.g., classical models) would clarify causal impact. 1664 -{{/expandable}} 923 + - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**. 924 + - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry. 1665 1665 1666 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 1667 -- Documents how **CRT-aligned ideology disproportionately targets White students and teachers**. 1668 -- Confirms that **school choice fails to protect against ideological indoctrination** when CSJ is systemic. 1669 -- Supports the need for **explicitly anti-indoctrination educational frameworks** grounded in neutrality and merit. 1670 -{{/expandable}} 926 +--- 1671 1671 1672 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 1673 -1. Investigate **legal protections for students against compelled ideological speech**. 1674 -2. Study **alternatives to CSJ pedagogy**, such as classical liberal education or civic humanism. 1675 -3. Examine **psychological outcomes** of guilt-based racial framing among White children. 1676 -{{/expandable}} 928 +## **Relevance to Subproject** 929 +- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India. 930 +- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations. 931 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations. 1677 1677 1678 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 1679 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:11.Goldberg_Kaufmann_CSJ_Education_Impact.pdf]] 1680 -{{/expandable}} 1681 -{{/expandable}} 933 +--- 1682 1682 935 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration** 936 +1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations. 937 +2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**. 938 +3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**. 1683 1683 1684 -{{expandable summary="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}} 1685 -**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education* 1686 -**Date of Publication:** *2019* 1687 -**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum* 1688 -**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"* 1689 -**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140) 1690 -**Subject Matter:** *Critical Race Theory, Sports Sociology, Anti-White Institutional Framing* 940 +--- 1691 1691 1692 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 1693 -1. **General Observations:** 1694 - - Based on **47 athlete interviews**, cherry-picked from non-revenue Division I sports. 1695 - - The study claims **“segregation”**, but presents no evidence of actual exclusion or policy bias — just demographic imbalance. 942 +## **Summary of Research Study** 943 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**. 1696 1696 1697 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 1698 - - Attributes **White participation** in certain sports to "systemic racism", ignoring **self-selection, geography, and cultural affinity**. 1699 - - Claims White athletes are “protected” from race discussions — but never engages with **Black overrepresentation in revenue sports**. 945 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis. 1700 1700 1701 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 1702 - - White athletes are portrayed as **ignorant of their privilege**, a claim drawn entirely from CRT frameworks rather than behavior or outcome. 1703 - - **No empirical data** is offered on policy, scholarship distribution, or team selection criteria. 1704 -{{/expandable}} 947 +--- 1705 1705 1706 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 1707 -1. **Primary Observations:** 1708 - - Frames **normal demographic patterns** (e.g., majority-White rosters in tennis or rowing) as "institutional whiteness". 1709 - - **Ignores the structural dominance** of Black athletes in high-profile revenue sports like football and basketball. 949 +## **📄 Download Full Study** 950 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]] 1710 1710 1711 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 1712 - - White athletes are criticized for **lacking racial awareness**, reinforcing the moral framing of **Whiteness as inherently problematic**. 1713 - - **Cultural preference, individual merit, and athletic subculture** are all excluded from consideration. 952 +{{/expand}} 1714 1714 1715 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 1716 - - Argues that college sports **reinforce racial hierarchy** without ever showing how White athletes benefit more than Black athletes. 1717 - - Offers **no comparative analysis** of scholarships, graduation rates, or media portrayal by race. 1718 -{{/expandable}} 954 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}} 1719 1719 1720 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 1721 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 1722 - - Useful as a clear example of **how CRT ideologues weaponize demography** to frame White majority spaces as inherently suspect. 1723 - - Shows how **academic literature systematically avoids symmetrical analysis** when outcomes favor White participants. 1724 1724 1725 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 1726 - - **Excludes revenue sports**, where Black athletes dominate by numbers, prestige, and compensation. 1727 - - **Fails to explain** how team composition emerges from voluntary participation, geography, or subcultural identity. 1728 - - Treats **racial imbalance as proof of racism**, bypassing merit, interest, or socioeconomic context. 1729 - 1730 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 1731 - - Include **White athlete perspectives** without pre-framing them as racially naive or complicit. 1732 - - **Compare all sports**, including those where Black athletes thrive and lead. 1733 - - Remove CRT framing and **evaluate outcomes empirically**, not ideologically. 1734 -{{/expandable}} 1735 - 1736 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 1737 -- Demonstrates how **DEI-aligned research reframes benign patterns** as oppressive when White majorities are involved. 1738 -- Illustrates **anti-White academic framing** in environments where no institutional barrier exists. 1739 -- Provides a concrete example of how **CRT avoids acknowledging Black dominance in elite spaces** (revenue athletics). 1740 -{{/expandable}} 1741 - 1742 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 1743 -1. Investigate **racial self-sorting and cultural affiliation** in athletic participation. 1744 -2. Compare **media framing of White-majority vs. Black-majority sports**. 1745 -3. Study **how CRT narratives distort athletic merit and demographic outcomes**. 1746 -{{/expandable}} 1747 - 1748 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 1749 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]] 1750 -{{/expandable}} 1751 -{{/expandable}} 1752 - 1753 - 1754 -{{expandable summary="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}} 1755 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)* 957 +{{expand title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations" expanded="false"}} 958 +**Source:** *Nature* 1756 1756 **Date of Publication:** *2016* 1757 -**Author(s):** * Kelly M. Hoffman, SophieTrawalter,JordanR. Axt, M.NormanOliver*1758 -**Title:** *" RacialBiasinPain Assessmentand TreatmentRecommendations,and False Beliefs AboutBiologicalDifferencesBetweenBlacks and Whites"*1759 -**DOI:** [10.10 73/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)1760 -**Subject Matter:** * MedicalEthics, RaceinMedicine,ImplicitBias*960 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others* 961 +**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"* 962 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964) 963 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 1761 1761 1762 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 1763 -1. **General Observations:** 1764 - - Analyzed responses from **222 white medical students and residents**. 1765 - - Investigated belief in **false biological differences between Black and White people**. 1766 - - Measured how those beliefs affected **pain ratings and treatment recommendations**. 965 +--- 1767 1767 1768 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 1769 - - **50% of participants endorsed at least one false belief** (e.g., Black people have thicker skin or less sensitive nerve endings). 1770 - - Those who endorsed false beliefs were **more likely to underestimate Black patients' pain**. 1771 - 1772 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 1773 - - Bias was **most prominent among first-year students**, diminishing slightly with experience. 1774 - - Study used **hypothetical case vignettes**, not real patient data. 1775 -{{/expandable}} 1776 - 1777 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 1778 -1. **Primary Observations:** 1779 - - False biological beliefs were **strongly correlated with racial disparity** in pain assessment. 1780 - - Endorsement of such beliefs led to **less appropriate treatment for Black patients** in fictional cases. 1781 - 1782 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 1783 - - Medical students with **no false beliefs showed no treatment bias**. 1784 - - No evidence was presented of **active discrimination** — bias appeared linked to **misinformation, not malice**. 1785 - 1786 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 1787 - - Fictional vignettes demonstrated that **misinformation about biology**, not systemic malice, led to unequal care. 1788 - - The study **did not show bias against White patients**, nor explore disparities affecting them. 1789 -{{/expandable}} 1790 - 1791 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 1792 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 1793 - - Provides valuable insight into **how medical myths can affect judgment**. 1794 - - Demonstrates the importance of **clinical education and evidence-based practice**. 1795 - 1796 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 1797 - - Fails to examine **bias affecting White patients**, including under-treatment of opioid dependence or mental health. 1798 - - Only focuses on one direction of disparity, treating **White patients as a control** rather than a population worthy of study. 1799 - - **Overemphasizes "racial bias"** narrative despite the findings being more about **ignorance than intent**. 1800 - 1801 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 1802 - - Include **comparison groups for all races**, not just a binary Black–White framework. 1803 - - Investigate **systemic neglect of poor rural White populations**, especially in Appalachia and the Midwest. 1804 - - Clarify the **distinction between false belief and racial animus**, which the study conflates under CRT framing. 1805 -{{/expandable}} 1806 - 1807 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 1808 -- Shows how **DEI-aligned narratives exploit limited findings** to vilify White professionals. 1809 -- Provides an example of a **legitimate medical education issue being repackaged as “racial bias.”** 1810 -- Highlights the **lack of reciprocal scrutiny** of how minorities may receive **preferential narrative framing** or **programmatic support**. 1811 -{{/expandable}} 1812 - 1813 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 1814 -1. Study whether **DEI training reduces false beliefs** or simply **induces White guilt**. 1815 -2. Investigate **biases against White rural patients**, especially regarding **opioid or pain management stigma**. 1816 -3. Conduct **clinical outcome studies**, not self-reported vignettes, to test **real-world disparities**. 1817 -{{/expandable}} 1818 - 1819 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 1820 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]] 1821 -{{/expandable}} 1822 -{{/expandable}} 1823 - 1824 - 1825 -{{expandable summary="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}} 1826 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)* 1827 -**Date of Publication:** *2015* 1828 -**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton* 1829 -**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"* 1830 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112) 1831 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 1832 - 1833 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 967 +## **Key Statistics** 1834 1834 1. **General Observations:** 1835 - - Mortalityratesamong**middle-agedwhiten-HispanicAmericans(ages45–54)**increasedfrom 1999to2013.1836 - - This reversalinmortalitytrendsisuniquetothe U.S.;**nootherwealthycountry experiencedasimilarrise**.969 + - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**. 970 + - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas. 1837 1837 1838 1838 2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 1839 - - Theincreasewas **mostpronouncedamongthose withahighschooleducationorless**.1840 - - HispanicandBlacknon-Hispanicmortalitycontinuedtodeclineoverhe sameperiod.973 + - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups. 974 + - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania. 1841 1841 1842 1842 3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 1843 - - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**. 1844 - - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**. 1845 -{{/expandable}} 977 + - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**. 978 + - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**. 1846 1846 1847 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 980 +--- 981 + 982 +## **Findings** 1848 1848 1. **Primary Observations:** 1849 - - Therise inmortalityis attributed to**substance abuse,economic distress,and deterioratingmentalhealth**.1850 - - Theincrease in **suicidesandopioidoverdoses parallelsbroader socioeconomicdecline**.984 + - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model. 985 + - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**. 1851 1851 1852 1852 2. **Subgroup Trends:** 1853 - - The**largestmortality increases**occurredamong**whiteswithouta collegedegree**.1854 - - Chronic pain,functionallimitations,andself-reportedmentaldistress **rose significantlyin affected groups**.988 + - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks. 989 + - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**. 1855 1855 1856 1856 3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 1857 - - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates. 1858 - - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations. 1859 -{{/expandable}} 992 + - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**. 993 + - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**. 1860 1860 1861 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 995 +--- 996 + 997 +## **Critique and Observations** 1862 1862 1. **Strengths of the Study:** 1863 - - ** First majorudytohighlightrisingmidlifemortalityamongU.S. whites**.1864 - - Uses **CDC andCensusmortalitydataspanningovera decade**.999 + - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project. 1000 + - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**. 1865 1865 1866 1866 2. **Limitations of the Study:** 1867 - - Does nottablish**causality**between economicdeclineand increased mortality.1868 - - Lacks **granular dataonopioid prescribingpatternsand regionaldifferences**.1003 + - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability. 1004 + - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully. 1869 1869 1870 1870 3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 1871 - - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**. 1872 - - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed. 1873 -{{/expandable}} 1007 + - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling. 1008 + - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations. 1874 1874 1875 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 1876 -- Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes. 1877 -- Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**. 1878 -- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**. 1879 -{{/expandable}} 1010 +--- 1880 1880 1881 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 1882 -1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**. 1883 -2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**. 1884 -3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**. 1885 -{{/expandable}} 1012 +## **Relevance to Subproject** 1013 +- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**. 1014 +- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations. 1015 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**. 1886 1886 1887 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 1888 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]] 1889 -{{/expandable}} 1890 -{{/expandable}} 1017 +--- 1891 1891 1892 -{{expandable summary="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}} 1893 -**Source:** *Urban Studies* 1894 -**Date of Publication:** *2023* 1895 -**Author(s):** *Nina Glick Schiller, Jens Schneider, Ayşe Çağlar* 1896 -**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"* 1897 -**DOI:** [10.1177/00420980231170057](https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231170057) 1898 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Diversity, Migration, Identity Politics* 1019 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration** 1020 +1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**. 1021 +2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**. 1022 +3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**. 1899 1899 1900 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 1901 -1. **General Observations:** 1902 - - Based on interviews with **White European residents** in three major European cities. 1903 - - Focused on how **"non-migrants" (code for native Whites)** perceive and adapt to so-called “superdiversity”. 1024 +--- 1904 1904 1905 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 1906 - - Interviewees were **overwhelmingly framed as obstacles** to multicultural harmony. 1907 - - Researchers **pathologized attachment to local culture or ethnic identity** as “resistance to change”. 1026 +## **Summary of Research Study** 1027 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**. 1908 1908 1909 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 1910 - - Claims that even positive civic participation by Whites may **“reinforce white privilege.”** 1911 - - Provides **no quantitative data** on actual neighborhood changes or crime statistics. 1912 -{{/expandable}} 1029 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis. 1913 1913 1914 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 1915 -1. **Primary Observations:** 1916 - - Argues that White natives, by simply existing and having a historical presence, **“shape urban inequality.”** 1917 - - Positions White cultural norms as inherently oppressive or exclusionary. 1031 +--- 1918 1918 1919 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 1920 - - Critiques White residents for seeking **cultural familiarity or demographic continuity.** 1921 - - Presents **White neighborhood cohesion** as a form of “invisible boundary-making.” 1033 +## **📄 Download Full Study** 1034 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]] 1922 1922 1923 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 1924 - - Interviews frame **normal concerns about safety, schooling, or housing** as coded “racism.” 1925 - - Treats **multicultural disruption** as inherently positive, and **resistance as bigotry.** 1926 -{{/expandable}} 1036 +{{/expand}} 1927 1927 1928 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 1929 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 1930 - - Reveals how **social scientists increasingly treat Whiteness itself as a problem.** 1931 - - Offers an **unintentional case study in academic anti-White framing.** 1038 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}} 1932 1932 1933 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 1934 - - **Completely ignores migrant-driven displacement** of working-class Whites. 1935 - - Makes **no attempt to understand White residents sympathetically**, only as barriers. 1936 - - Lacks analysis of **economic factors, crime, housing scarcity, or policy failures** contributing to discontent. 1040 +{{expand title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies" expanded="false"}} 1041 +**Source:** *Nature Genetics* 1042 +**Date of Publication:** *2015* 1043 +**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma* 1044 +**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"* 1045 +**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328) 1046 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 1937 1937 1938 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 1939 - - Include **White perspectives without presuming guilt or fragility.** 1940 - - Disaggregate “White” by **class, locality, or experience** — not treat as a monolith. 1941 - - Balance cultural analysis with **hard demographic and economic data.** 1942 -{{/expandable}} 1048 +--- 1943 1943 1944 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 1945 -- Demonstrates how **academic literature increasingly stigmatizes White presence** in urban life. 1946 -- Shows how **“diversity” is defined as the absence or silence of native populations.** 1947 -- Useful for exposing how **CRT and superdiversity discourse erase White communities' legitimacy.** 1948 -{{/expandable}} 1949 - 1950 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 1951 -1. Study the **psychological impact of demographic displacement** on native European populations. 1952 -2. Examine **rising crime and social fragmentation** in “superdiverse” zones. 1953 -3. Analyze how **housing, schooling, and local economies** are impacted by mass migration. 1954 -{{/expandable}} 1955 - 1956 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 1957 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1177_00420980231170057.pdf]] 1958 -{{/expandable}} 1959 -{{/expandable}} 1960 - 1961 - 1962 -= Media = 1963 - 1964 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic"}} 1965 -**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication* 1966 -**Date of Publication:** *2021* 1967 -**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick* 1968 -**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"* 1969 -**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003) 1970 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 1971 - 1972 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 1050 +## **Key Statistics** 1973 1973 1. **General Observations:** 1974 - - Analyzed ** over 500,000socialmediainteractions**related to intergroupconflict.1975 - - Foundthat**computer-mediatedcommunication(CMC)intensifiespolarization**.1052 + - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**. 1053 + - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability. 1976 1976 1977 1977 2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 1978 - - **Anonymity and reducedsocialcues**in CMC increased hostility.1979 - - ** Echochambers formedmorefrequentlyinalgorithm-driven environments**.1056 + - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits. 1057 + - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment. 1980 1980 1981 1981 3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 1982 - - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions. 1983 - - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**. 1984 -{{/expandable}} 1060 + - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates. 1061 + - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates. 1985 1985 1986 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 1063 +--- 1064 + 1065 +## **Findings** 1987 1987 1. **Primary Observations:** 1988 - - **Onlineinteractionsamplify intergroup conflict**due toselectiveexposure andconfirmationbias.1989 - - **Algorithmicsortingcontributestoideologicalsegmentation**.1067 + - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences. 1068 + - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**. 1990 1990 1991 1991 2. **Subgroup Trends:** 1992 - - Participants with**strong pre-existingbiasesbecame morepolarized**afterexposuretoconflicting views.1993 - - ** Moderateusers weremorekely to disengage**fromconflict-heavydiscussions.1071 + - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (~70-80%)**. 1072 + - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**. 1994 1994 1995 1995 3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 1996 - - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces. 1997 - - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content. 1998 -{{/expandable}} 1075 + - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**. 1076 + - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain. 1999 1999 2000 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 1078 +--- 1079 + 1080 +## **Critique and Observations** 2001 2001 1. **Strengths of the Study:** 2002 - - **Largest dataset**to dateanalyzing**CMCandintergroupconflict**.2003 - - Uses **longitudinaldatatrackinguser behaviorvertime**.1082 + - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies. 1083 + - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**. 2004 2004 2005 2005 2. **Limitations of the Study:** 2006 - - Lacks**qualitative analysisofusermotivations**.2007 - - Focuseson**Westernsocial mediaplatforms**, missing globalperspectives.1086 + - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability. 1087 + - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**. 2008 2008 2009 2009 3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 2010 - - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics. 2011 - - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**. 2012 -{{/expandable}} 1090 + - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates. 1091 + - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends. 2013 2013 2014 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 2015 -- Explores how **digital communication influences social division**. 2016 -- Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**. 2017 -- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**. 2018 -{{/expandable}} 1093 +--- 2019 2019 2020 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 2021 -1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**. 2022 -2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**. 2023 -3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**. 2024 -{{/expandable}} 1095 +## **Relevance to Subproject** 1096 +- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**. 1097 +- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**. 1098 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**. 2025 2025 2026 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 2027 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]] 2028 -{{/expandable}} 2029 -{{/expandable}} 1100 +--- 2030 2030 2031 -{{expandable summary="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}} 2032 -**Source:** *Politics & Policy* 2033 -**Date of Publication:** *2007* 2034 -**Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson* 2035 -**Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"* 2036 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x) 2037 -**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 1102 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration** 1103 +1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**. 1104 +2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**. 1105 +3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**. 2038 2038 2039 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 2040 -1. **General Observations:** 2041 - - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**. 2042 - - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights. 1107 +--- 2043 2043 2044 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 2045 - - **Equality-based framing decreases opposition** to same-sex marriage. 2046 - - **Morality-based framing increases opposition** to same-sex marriage. 1109 +## **Summary of Research Study** 1110 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies. 2047 2047 2048 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 2049 - - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines. 2050 - - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates. 2051 -{{/expandable}} 1112 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis. 2052 2052 2053 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 2054 -1. **Primary Observations:** 2055 - - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights. 2056 - - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage. 1114 +--- 2057 2057 2058 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 2059 - - **Religious and conservative audiences** respond more to morality-based framing. 2060 - - **Younger and progressive audiences** respond more to equality-based framing. 1116 +## **📄 Download Full Study** 1117 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]] 2061 2061 2062 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 2063 - - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**. 2064 - - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**. 2065 -{{/expandable}} 1119 +{{/expand}} 2066 2066 2067 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 2068 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 2069 - - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**. 2070 - - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**. 1121 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}} 2071 2071 2072 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 2073 - - Focuses **only on U.S. media coverage**, limiting global applicability. 2074 - - Does not account for **social media's growing influence** on public opinion. 1123 +{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}} 1124 +**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics* 1125 +**Date of Publication:** *2002* 1126 +**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams* 1127 +**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"* 1128 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865) 1129 +**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 2075 2075 2076 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 2077 - - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**. 2078 - - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**. 2079 -{{/expandable}} 1131 +--- 2080 2080 2081 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 2082 -- Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**. 2083 -- Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**. 2084 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**. 2085 -{{/expandable}} 2086 - 2087 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 2088 -1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**. 2089 -2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**. 2090 -3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**. 2091 -{{/expandable}} 2092 - 2093 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 2094 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]] 2095 -{{/expandable}} 2096 -{{/expandable}} 2097 - 2098 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}} 2099 -**Source:** *Journal of Communication* 2100 -**Date of Publication:** *2019* 2101 -**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor* 2102 -**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"* 2103 -**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021) 2104 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 2105 - 2106 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 1133 +## **Key Statistics** 2107 2107 1. **General Observations:** 2108 - - Conducted**12experimentalstudies** on**digitalmedia'simpactonpoliticalbeliefs**.2109 - - **58%ofparticipants**showed shifts inpoliticalopinionbasedononlinecontent.1135 + - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution. 1136 + - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**. 2110 2110 2111 2111 2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 2112 - - **Video-basedcontent was2xmorepersuasive**thantext-basedcontent.2113 - - Participants**underage 35 weremore susceptibletopoliticalmessagingshifts**.1139 + - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**. 1140 + - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**. 2114 2114 2115 2115 3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 2116 - - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**. 2117 - - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**. 2118 -{{/expandable}} 1143 + - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations. 1144 + - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events. 2119 2119 2120 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 1146 +--- 1147 + 1148 +## **Findings** 2121 2121 1. **Primary Observations:** 2122 - - **Digital media significantlyinfluencespoliticalopinions**,with youngeraudiencesbeing themostimpacted.2123 - - **Multimediacontentismorepersuasive**thantraditionaltext-basedarguments.1150 + - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis. 1151 + - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**. 2124 2124 2125 2125 2. **Subgroup Trends:** 2126 - - ** Social media platforms had strongerpersuasiveeffects** than newswebsites.2127 - - Pa rticipantswhoengagedin**onlinediscussions retained morepoliticalknowledge**.1154 + - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns. 1155 + - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**. 2128 2128 2129 2129 3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 2130 - - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content. 2131 - - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**. 2132 -{{/expandable}} 1158 + - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**. 1159 + - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**. 2133 2133 2134 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 1161 +--- 1162 + 1163 +## **Critique and Observations** 2135 2135 1. **Strengths of the Study:** 2136 - - ** Large-scale experimentaldesign**allows forontrolledcomparisons.2137 - - Covers **multipledigitalplatforms**,ensuring robustfindings.1165 + - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations. 1166 + - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**. 2138 2138 2139 2139 2. **Limitations of the Study:** 2140 - - Limitedto**short-termpersuasion effects**,without long-termfollow-up.2141 - - Doesnot explore**the roleof misinformationinpoliticalpersuasion**.1169 + - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity. 1170 + - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**. 2142 2142 2143 2143 3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 2144 - - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions. 2145 - - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**. 2146 -{{/expandable}} 1173 + - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**. 1174 + - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**. 2147 2147 2148 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 2149 -- Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**. 2150 -- Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**. 2151 -- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**. 2152 -{{/expandable}} 1176 +--- 2153 2153 2154 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 2155 -1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**. 2156 -2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**. 2157 -3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**. 2158 -{{/expandable}} 1178 +## **Relevance to Subproject** 1179 +- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**. 1180 +- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**. 1181 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**. 2159 2159 2160 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 2161 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]] 2162 -{{/expandable}} 2163 -{{/expandable}} 1183 +--- 2164 2164 2165 -{{expandable summary="Study: White Americans’ Preference for Black People in Advertising Has Increased in the Past 66 Years"}} 2166 -Source: Journal of Advertising Research 2167 -Date of Publication: 2022 2168 -Author(s): Peter M. Lenk, Eric T. Bradlow, Randolph E. Bucklin, Sungeun (Clara) Kim 2169 -Title: "White Americans’ Preference for Black People in Advertising Has Increased in the Past 66 Years: A Meta-Analysis" 2170 -DOI: 10.2501/JAR-2022-028 2171 -Subject Matter: Advertising Trends, Racial Representation, Cultural Shifts 1185 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration** 1186 +1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**. 1187 +2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**. 1188 +3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**. 2172 2172 2173 - {{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}1190 +--- 2174 2174 2175 -**General Observations:** 1192 +## **Summary of Research Study** 1193 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**. 2176 2176 2177 - Meta-analysisof74studies conductedbetween1955and2020onracialrepresentationinadvertising.1195 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis. 2178 2178 2179 - Sample included mostly White U.S. participants, with consistent tracking of their preferences.1197 +--- 2180 2180 2181 -**Subgroup Analysis:** 1199 +## **📄 Download Full Study** 1200 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]] 2182 2182 2183 - Found a steady increase inpositive responses toward Black models/actors inads by White viewers.1202 +{{/expand}} 2184 2184 2185 - Recentdecades showequalgreater preferencefor Blackfaces comparedto White ones.1204 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}} 2186 2186 2187 -**Other Significant Data Points:** 1206 +{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}} 1207 +**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics* 1208 +**Date of Publication:** *2002* 1209 +**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams* 1210 +**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"* 1211 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865) 1212 +**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 2188 2188 2189 - Study frames this shift as a positive move toward diversity, ignoring implications for displaced White cultural representation.1214 +--- 2190 2190 2191 -No equivalent data was collected on Black or Hispanic attitudes toward White representation. 2192 -{{/expandable}} 2193 - 2194 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 2195 - 2196 -**Primary Observations:** 2197 - 2198 -White Americans have become increasingly receptive or favorable toward Black figures in advertising, even over timeframes of widespread cultural change. 2199 - 2200 -These preferences held across product types, media formats, and ad genres. 2201 - 2202 -**Subgroup Trends:** 2203 - 2204 -Studies from the 1960s–1980s showed preference for in-group racial representation, which has dropped sharply for Whites in recent decades. 2205 - 2206 -The largest positive attitudinal shift occurred between 1995–2020, coinciding with major DEI and cultural programming trends. 2207 - 2208 -**Specific Case Analysis:** 2209 - 2210 -The authors position this as “progress,” but offer no critical reflection on the effects of displacing White imagery from national advertising narratives. 2211 - 2212 -Completely omits consumer preference studies in countries outside the U.S., especially in more homogeneous nations. 2213 -{{/expandable}} 2214 - 2215 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 2216 - 2217 -**Strengths of the Study:** 2218 - 2219 -Large-scale dataset across decades provides a clear empirical view of long-term trends. 2220 - 2221 -Useful as a benchmark of how White American preferences have evolved under sociocultural pressure. 2222 - 2223 -**Limitations of the Study:** 2224 - 2225 -Fails to ask whether increasing diversity is consumer-driven or culturally imposed. 2226 - 2227 -Ignores the potential alienation or displacement of White cultural identity from mainstream advertising. 2228 - 2229 -Assumes “diverse equals better” without testing economic or emotional impact of those shifts. 2230 - 2231 -**Suggestions for Improvement:** 2232 - 2233 -Include non-White viewer reactions to all-White or traditional American imagery for balance. 2234 - 2235 -Test whether consumers notice racial proportions or experience fatigue from overcorrection. 2236 - 2237 -Explore regional or class-based variance among White viewers, not just aggregate averages. 2238 -{{/expandable}} 2239 - 2240 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 2241 - 2242 -Demonstrates how White cultural imagery has been steadily replaced or downplayed in the public sphere. 2243 - 2244 -Useful for showing how marketing professionals and researchers frame White displacement as “progress.” 2245 - 2246 -Empirically supports the decline of White in-group preference — possibly due to reeducation, guilt framing, or media saturation. 2247 -{{/expandable}} 2248 - 2249 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 2250 - 2251 -Study how overrepresentation of minorities in advertising compares to actual demographics. 2252 - 2253 -Examine whether consumers feel represented or alienated by identity-based marketing. 2254 - 2255 -Investigate the psychological and cultural impact of long-term demographic displacement in national advertising. 2256 -{{/expandable}} 2257 - 2258 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 2259 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.2501_JAR-2022-028.pdf]] 2260 -{{/expandable}} 2261 -{{/expandable}} 2262 - 2263 -{{expandable summary="Study: Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice"}} 2264 -**Source:** *Journal of Communication* 2265 -**Date of Publication:** *2020* 2266 -**Author(s):** *John A. Banas, Lauren L. Miller, David A. Braddock, Sun Kyong Lee* 2267 -**Title:** *"Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice"* 2268 -**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqz032](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz032) 2269 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Psychology, Prejudice Reduction, Intergroup Relations* 2270 - 2271 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 1216 +## **Key Statistics** 2272 2272 1. **General Observations:** 2273 - - A ggregated**71studiesvolving27,000+participants**.2274 - - Focused onhow **mediaportrayalsof out-groups(primarilyminorities)**affect attitudesamongdominantin-groups(i.e.,Whites).1218 + - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution. 1219 + - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**. 2275 2275 2276 2276 2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 2277 - - **Fictionalentertainment**hadstrongereffects thannews.2278 - - ** Positive portrayalsofminorities**correlatedwith significantreductionsin“prejudice”.1222 + - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**. 1223 + - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**. 2279 2279 2280 2280 3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 2281 - - Effects were stronger when minority characters were portrayed as **warm, competent, and morally relatable**. 2282 - - Contact was more effective when it mimicked **face-to-face friendship narratives**. 2283 -{{/expandable}} 1226 + - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations. 1227 + - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events. 2284 2284 2285 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 1229 +--- 1230 + 1231 +## **Findings** 2286 2286 1. **Primary Observations:** 2287 - - Mediais a **powerfulolforshapingracialattitudes**,capableofreducing“prejudice” withoutreal-worldcontact.2288 - - **Repeatedexposure** to positive portrayalsof minoritiesledtoincreasedacceptanceand reducednegativebias.1233 + - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis. 1234 + - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**. 2289 2289 2290 2290 2. **Subgroup Trends:** 2291 - - **W hiteparticipants**weretheprimary targetsofeconditioning.2292 - - Minorityparticipantswere notstudiedin terms of**prejudiceagainstWhites**.1237 + - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns. 1238 + - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**. 2293 2293 2294 2294 3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 2295 - - “Parasocial” relationships with minority characters (TV/movie exposure) had comparable psychological effects to actual friendships. 2296 - - Media framing functioned as a **top-down mechanism for social engineering**, not just passive reflection of society. 2297 -{{/expandable}} 1241 + - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**. 1242 + - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**. 2298 2298 2299 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 1244 +--- 1245 + 1246 +## **Critique and Observations** 2300 2300 1. **Strengths of the Study:** 2301 - - High-qualityquantitativemeta-analysiswithcleardesignandrobust statistical handling.2302 - - Acknowledges **media’sabilitytoalterlong-heldsocial beliefs**withoutphysicalcontact.1248 + - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations. 1249 + - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**. 2303 2303 2304 2304 2. **Limitations of the Study:** 2305 - - Only defines “prejudice” as **negative attitudes from Whites toward minorities** — no exploration of anti-White media narratives or bias. 2306 - - Ignores the effects of **overexposure to minority portrayals** on cultural alienation or backlash. 2307 - - Assumes **assimilation into DEI norms is inherently positive**, and any reluctance to accept them is “prejudice”. 1252 + - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity. 1253 + - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**. 2308 2308 2309 2309 3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 2310 - - Study reciprocal dynamics — how **minority media portrayals impact attitudes toward Whites**. 2311 - - Investigate whether constant valorization of minorities leads to **resentment, guilt, or political disengagement** among White viewers. 2312 - - Analyze **media saturation effects**, especially in multicultural propaganda and corporate DEI messaging. 2313 -{{/expandable}} 1256 + - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**. 1257 + - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**. 2314 2314 2315 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 2316 -- Provides **direct evidence** that media is being used to **reshape racial attitudes** through emotional, parasocial contact. 2317 -- Reinforces concern that **“tolerance” is engineered via asymmetric emotional exposure**, not organic consensus. 2318 -- Useful for documenting how **Whiteness is often treated as a bias to be corrected**, not a culture to be respected. 2319 -{{/expandable}} 1259 +--- 2320 2320 2321 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 2322 -1. Investigate **reverse parasocial effects** — how negative portrayals of White men affect self-perception and mental health. 2323 -2. Study how **mass entertainment normalizes demographic shifts** and silences native concerns. 2324 -3. Compare effects of **Western vs. non-Western media systems** in promoting diversity narratives. 2325 -{{/expandable}} 1261 +## **Relevance to Subproject** 1262 +- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**. 1263 +- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**. 1264 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**. 2326 2326 2327 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 2328 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:Banas et al. - 2020 - Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice.pdf]] 2329 -{{/expandable}} 2330 -{{/expandable}} 1266 +--- 2331 2331 1268 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration** 1269 +1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**. 1270 +2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**. 1271 +3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**. 2332 2332 2333 -{{expandable summary="Study: Cultural Voyeurism – A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Interaction"}} 2334 -**Source:** *Journal of Communication* 2335 -**Date of Publication:** *2018* 2336 -**Author(s):** *Osei Appiah* 2337 -**Title:** *"Cultural Voyeurism: A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Interaction"* 2338 -**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021) 2339 -**Subject Matter:** *Intergroup contact, racial stereotypes, media, identity formation* 1273 +--- 2340 2340 2341 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 2342 -1. **No empirical dataset** — this is a theoretical framework paper, not a quantitative study. 2343 -2. **Heavily cites prior empirical work**, including: 2344 - - Czopp & Monteith (2006) on “complimentary stereotypes” 2345 - - Armstrong et al. (1992), Entman & Rojecki (2000) on media distortion of race 2346 - - Pettigrew et al. (2011) on intergroup contact 1275 +## **Summary of Research Study** 1276 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**. 2347 2347 2348 -3. **Statistical implications:** Repeatedly emphasizes the role of media in shaping racial beliefs when direct interracial contact is absent. 2349 -{{/expandable}} 1278 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis. 2350 2350 2351 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 2352 -1. **Primary Observations:** 2353 - - Defines *cultural voyeurism* as the process of using media to observe and learn about other racial/ethnic groups. 2354 - - Claims it can both reinforce stereotypes and reduce prejudice depending on context. 2355 - - Suggests that Whites’ fascination with Black culture (e.g., hip-hop, athleticism) is a driver of empathy and improved race relations. 1280 +--- 2356 2356 2357 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 2358 - - White youth are singled out as cultural voyeurs increasingly emulating Black identity for social cachet (“coolness”). 2359 - - Positive media portrayals of Blacks (e.g., in entertainment) said to reduce racial bias. 1282 +## **📄 Download Full Study** 1283 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]] 2360 2360 2361 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 2362 - - No case study provided, but mentions “Duck Dynasty” and “hip-hop culture” as stereotyped White/Black identity constructs respectively. 2363 -{{/expandable}} 1285 +{{/expand}} 2364 2364 2365 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 2366 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 2367 - - Recognizes media’s dual role in shaping intergroup perception. 2368 - - Accurately captures the obsession with racial “coolness” as a social phenomenon. 1287 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}} 2369 2369 2370 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 2371 - - Frames White identification with Black culture as inherently progressive, ignoring issues of **anti-White displacement**. 2372 - - Treats *positive stereotypes of minorities* (e.g., athleticism, musicality) as meaningful substitutes for structural reality. 2373 - - Lacks any meaningful inquiry into *reverse cultural voyeurism* (i.e., non-Whites voyeuristically consuming and appropriating White identity or values). 2374 2374 2375 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 2376 - - Should confront whether “cultural voyeurism” ultimately erodes group boundaries and majority cultural integrity. 2377 - - Needs empirical validation of claims. 2378 - - Avoids uncomfortable realities about how White identity is increasingly stigmatized in media — which undermines genuine empathy or parity. 2379 -{{/expandable}} 2380 2380 2381 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 2382 -- Helps explain how **media conditioning** primes young Whites to *admire, emulate, and eventually submit* to Black cultural dominance. 2383 -- Directly supports the narrative that **pro-White identity is systematically delegitimized**, while pro-Black identity is commodified and glamorized — then sold back to White youth. 2384 -- Useful in chapters/sections covering cultural appropriation *in reverse* — not by Whites, but **of Whiteness** by outsiders for critique and exploitation. 2385 -{{/expandable}} 2386 - 2387 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 2388 -1. Are there longitudinal studies showing cultural voyeurism weakening in-group preference among Whites? 2389 -2. Does this phenomenon correspond to decreased fertility, civic participation, or political alignment with group interest? 2390 -3. How do non-Western societies handle voyeuristic consumption of majority culture — do they permit or punish it? 2391 -{{/expandable}} 2392 - 2393 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 2394 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:Cultural Voyeurism A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Intera.pdf]] 2395 -{{/expandable}} 2396 -{{/expandable}} 2397 -
- Banas et al. - 2020 - Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice.pdf
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -472.9 KB - Content
- Cultural Voyeurism A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Intera.pdf
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -103.1 KB - Content
- lai2014.pdf
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -15.4 MB - Content
- lenk-et-al-white-americans-preference-for-black-people-in-advertising-has-increased-in-the-past-66-years-a-meta-analysis.pdf
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2.1 MB - Content