Skip to Content

Register
Log-in
Search
- The Free Speech / Pro White Wiki
- Page Index
- User Index
- Global
- What's New
- Wiki Index

0.0
1
2
3
4
5

0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From 118.1 to 117.1 From 121.1 to 120.1

From version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/06/19 06:04

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/06/19 05:48

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -647,287 +647,6 @@
  = Dating =
--{{expandable summary="Study: Positioning Multiraciality in Cyberspace – Treatment of Multiracial Daters in an Online Dating Website"}}
--**Source:** *Social Forces*
--**Date of Publication:** *2016*
--**Author(s):** *Stephanie M. Curington, Kevin K. Anderson, and Jennifer Glass*
--**Title:** *"Positioning Multiraciality in Cyberspace: Treatment of Multiracial Daters in an Online Dating Website"*
--**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow007](https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow007)
--**Subject Matter:** *Race and Dating, Multiracial Identity, Online Behavior*
--
--{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
--1. **General Observations:**
--   - Data drawn from **over 1 million messaging records** from an online dating site.
--   - Focused on how **monoracial users** (especially Whites) interact with **multiracial daters**.
--
--2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
--   - **Multiracial Black/White and Asian/White women** received **fewer responses from White men** than their monoracial counterparts.
--   - White daters showed **stronger preferences for monoracial identities**, particularly **own-race pairings**.
--
--3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
--   - **Multiracial men** fared worse than multiracial women across most pairings.
--   - **Latina/White and Asian/White multiracial women** were **more positively received by Black and Hispanic men**.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
--1. **Primary Observations:**
--   - White users demonstrated a clear pattern of **in-group preference**, preferring other White users (monoracial or partially White) over more ambiguous multiracial identities.
--   - Authors suggest this reflects **"boundary-maintaining behavior"** and **"latent racial bias"**.
--
--2. **Subgroup Trends:**
--   - **Multiracial women with partial minority backgrounds** were more acceptable to non-White men than White men.
--   - Multiracial daters were **often treated as ambiguous or “less desirable”** in ways the authors frame as **resistance to racial integration**.
--
--3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
--   - The most rejected group? **Black/White multiracial men**, especially by **White women**, which the authors do not frame as bias in the same way.
--   - The study shows **asymmetrical concern** — when Whites select inwardly, it's seen as racial boundary policing; when minorities do it, it's not pathologized.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
--1. **Strengths of the Study:**
--   - Large, real-world dataset gives useful behavioral insight into **racial preferences in dating**.
--   - Raises legitimate questions about **how race, desire, and group identity intersect**.
--
--2. **Limitations of the Study:**
--   - Frames **normal in-group preference among Whites as "resistance to multiraciality"**, rather than neutral human patterning.
--   - Ignores **similar or stronger in-group preference among Black and Asian users**, which could indicate *universal patterns*, not White exceptionalism.
--   - Uses CRT framing to subtly **morally indict Whites for preferring Whites**, while exempting other groups.
--
--3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
--   - Treat all in-group preference equally across racial groups — not just when Whites do it.
--   - Disaggregate by age, education, and regional variation to control for confounds.
--   - Consider whether **multiracial identity is ambiguous** by nature and if that ambiguity reduces clarity of signals in dating.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
--- Provides a data point in the **ongoing academic effort to pathologize White selectiveness**, even in private, personal domains like dating.
--- Demonstrates how **racial preferences are only considered “problematic” when they preserve White group boundaries**.
--- Supports analysis of **how DEI-aligned narratives seek to dissolve in-group loyalty under the guise of openness and inclusion**.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
--1. Investigate how **media and dating platforms reinforce multiracialism as normative** despite evidence of natural in-group selection.
--2. Study the **psychological effects of being told your preferences are morally wrong if you're White**.
--3. Explore how **multiracial identities are strategically framed** depending on political or cultural goals — exoticization, integration, or guilt projection.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
--[[Download Full Study>>attach:Curington et al. - Positioning Multiraciality in Cyberspace Treatment of Multiracial Daters in an Online Dating Websit.pdf]]
--{{/expandable}}
--{{/expandable}}
--
--
--{{expandable summary="Study: The White Man’s Burden: Gonzo Pornography and the Construction of Black Masculinity"}}
--**Source:** *Porn Studies*
--**Date of Publication:** *2015*
--**Author(s):** *Noah Tsika*
--**Title:** *"The White Man’s Burden: Gonzo Pornography and the Construction of Black Masculinity"*
--**DOI:** [10.1080/23268743.2015.1025389](https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2015.1025389)
--**Subject Matter:** *Pornography Studies, Race and Sexuality, Cultural Critique*
--
--{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
--1. **General Observations:**
--   - This is a **qualitative content analysis** of gonzo pornography, particularly interracial porn involving Black men and White women.
--   - The author reviews **select films, not a dataset**, using them to extrapolate broad cultural claims about race and sexuality.
--
--2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
--   - Claims that **interracial porn “others” and dehumanizes Black men**, yet selectively **frames Black male sexual aggression as liberatory**.
--   - The author accuses White male consumers of **fetishizing Black men** as both threats and tools for their own “colonial guilt.”
--
--3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
--   - No empirical evidence, just interpretive readings of scenes and film dialogue.
--   - Repeatedly criticizes **White directors and actors** as complicit in perpetuating “White supremacy through porn.”
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
--1. **Primary Observations:**
--   - Argues that **gonzo interracial porn functions as racial propaganda**, reinforcing White guilt while commodifying Black masculinity.
--   - Portrays White women as willing participants in a fantasy of racial domination that allegedly “liberates” Black men.
--
--2. **Subgroup Trends:**
--   - White male viewers are pathologized as both sexually repressed and voyeuristically complicit in anti-Black racism.
--   - Black male performers are framed as both victims of racial commodification and **agents of resistance through hypersexuality**.
--
--3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
--   - Cites scenes where Black male actors degrade or dominate White women as **“transgressive acts” that destabilize White power**, rather than examples of racial hostility or objectification.
--   - The narrative treats **racially charged sexual violence as deconstructive**, only when it reverses traditional racial dynamics.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
--1. **Strengths of the Study:**
--   - Useful in showcasing how **critical race theory invades even the most apolitical domains** (porn consumption) and turns them into race war battlegrounds.
--   - Offers insight into how **White heterosexuality is recoded as colonialism** in activist academia.
--
--2. **Limitations of the Study:**
--   - **No statistical basis**, relies entirely on biased interpretive analysis of fringe media.
--   - Presumes **intent and audience motivation** without surveys, viewership data, or cross-cultural comparison.
--   - Treats Black aggression as empowering and White sexuality as inherently oppressive — a double standard.
--
--3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
--   - Include comparative data on how different racial groups are portrayed in pornography across genres.
--   - Analyze how **minority-run porn studios frame interracial themes** — not just White-directed media.
--   - Address how racial fetishization **harms all groups**, not just Black men.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
--- Exemplifies how **racialized sexual narratives are reinterpreted to indict White identity**, even in consumer entertainment.
--- Shows how **DEI and CRT frameworks are applied to pornographic material** to pathologize White maleness while sanctifying non-White hypermasculinity.
--- Highlights the **academic bias that treats transgressive content as empowering when it serves anti-White narratives**.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
--1. Study how **interracial porn narratives differ when produced by non-White vs. White directors**.
--2. Examine **how racial power is portrayed in same-sex vs. heterosexual interracial porn**.
--3. Investigate whether the **fetishization of Black masculinity fuels unrealistic expectations and destructive stereotypes** for both Black and White men.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
--[[Download Full Study>>attach:Dinest - The White Man's Burden Gonzo Pornography and the Construction of Black Masculinity.pdf]]
--{{/expandable}}
--{{/expandable}}
--
--
--{{expandable summary="Study: Gendered Racial Exclusion Among White Internet Daters"}}
--**Source:** *Social Science Research*
--**Date of Publication:** *2009*
--**Author(s):** *Cynthia Feliciano, Belinda Robnett, Golnaz Komaie*
--**Title:** *"Gendered Racial Exclusion Among White Internet Daters"*
--**DOI:** [10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.04.004](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.04.004)
--**Subject Matter:** *Online Dating, Racial Preferences, CRT Framing of White Intimacy*
--
--{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
--1. **General Observations:**
--   - Based on data from **Love@aol.com**, analyzing **over 6,000 profiles** from California.
--   - The study investigated **racial preferences listed explicitly** in dating profiles.
--
--2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
--   - **White women were least likely to express openness to interracial dating**, particularly with Black and Asian men.
--   - **White men also showed exclusion**, but were more open than White women.
--
--3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
--   - The authors labeled preference for one’s own race as **“racial exclusion”**.
--   - Profiles by non-White users expressing same-race preferences were **not similarly problematized**.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
--1. **Primary Observations:**
--   - **White in-group preference was framed as discriminatory**, regardless of intent or context.
--   - Dating preferences were interpreted as a **“reinforcement of racial hierarchies”**.
--
--2. **Subgroup Trends:**
--   - The study suggested **White women’s selectivity** stemmed from **cultural and structural advantages**, implying racial gatekeeping.
--   - Did not critically examine **non-White preferences** for their own race.
--
--3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
--   - Highlighted that **Latina and Asian women were more open to White men** than to men of their own ethnicity, which was not treated as exclusionary.
--   - **No racial preference was criticized except when it protected White boundaries.**
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
--1. **Strengths of the Study:**
--   - Large dataset from real-world dating profiles.
--   - Provides rare insight into **gendered patterns of racial preference**.
--
--2. **Limitations of the Study:**
--   - **Frames personal preference as political discrimination** when expressed by White users.
--   - **Fails to control for cultural compatibility, attraction patterns, or religious values.**
--   - **Double standard** in analysis — **non-White selectivity is ignored or justified.**
--
--3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
--   - Should distinguish **racial animus from in-group preference**.
--   - Include **psychological, aesthetic, and cultural compatibility data**.
--   - Apply **equal critical lens to all racial groups**, not just Whites.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
--- Reinforces how CRT-aligned research pathologizes **White in-group dating preferences**.
--- Supports the claim that **White intimacy boundaries are uniquely scrutinized** and politicized.
--- Demonstrates how even non-political behavior (e.g., dating) is racialized when it involves Whites.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
--1. Study how **dating preferences vary by upbringing, media influence, and culture**, not just race.
--2. Analyze **racial preferences across all groups** with equal rigor and skepticism.
--3. Examine the **mental health impact of stigmatizing in-group preference** among Whites.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
--[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.ssresearch.2009.04.004.pdf]]
--{{/expandable}}
--{{/expandable}}
--
--
--{{expandable summary="Study: Black Penis and the Demoralization of the Western World"}}
--**Source:** *Journal of European Psychoanalysis*
--**Date of Publication:** *2009*
--**Author(s):** *Kristen Fink* *Jewish*))
--**Title:** *"Black Penis and the Demoralization of the Western World: Sexual relationships between black men and white women as a cause of decline"*
--**DOI:** *Unavailable – Psychoanalytic essay publication*
--**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sexuality, Psychoanalysis, Cultural Demoralization*
--
--{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
--1. **General Observations:**
--   - This is a **psychoanalytic essay**, not an empirical study.
--   - Uses **Freudian and Lacanian theory** to explore symbolic meanings of interracial sex.
--   - Frames **Black male–White female pairings** as psychologically disruptive to the White male ego and Western civilization.
--
--2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
--   - Positions **Black men as symbolic rivals** to emasculated Western (White) men.
--   - **White women’s interracial attraction** is framed as rebellion or rejection of Western order.
--
--3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
--   - The essay proposes that **sexual representation in media** is demoralizing to White culture.
--   - Uses **high theory language** to justify what is ultimately an anti-White cultural narrative.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
--1. **Primary Observations:**
--   - **Interracial sexual dynamics** are framed as central to **Western decline**.
--   - **White masculinity is portrayed as passive, obsolete, or neurotic** in contrast to hypermasculinized Blackness.
--
--2. **Subgroup Trends:**
--   - Suggests White men internalize emasculation through exposure to interracial symbolism.
--   - Sees **cultural loss of confidence** in White society as stemming from racial-sexual symbolism.
--
--3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
--   - Analyzes media tropes (e.g., interracial porn, pop culture) through the lens of psychoanalytic guilt and transgression.
--   - Never critiques the **ideological project of glorifying Blackness at the expense of White identity**.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
--1. **Strengths of the Study:**
--   - Reveals how **elite academic disciplines like psychoanalysis** are used to mask anti-White narratives in esoteric jargon.
--   - Serves as **ideological evidence** of demoralization tactics embedded in cultural theory.
--
--2. **Limitations of the Study:**
--   - No empirical data, surveys, or statistical analysis — purely speculative.
--   - **Does not critique hypersexualization of Black men** or the dehumanizing aspects of the fetish.
--   - Assumes **White masculinity must passively accept its symbolic erasure** as psychoanalytically “natural.”
--
--3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
--   - Include **perspectives from White men and women** on how these portrayals affect their psychological well-being.
--   - Disentangle psychoanalytic theory from **racial guilt ideology**.
--   - Explore **mutual respect-based frameworks** for interracial dynamics rather than ones rooted in humiliation or power symbolism.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
--- Illustrates how **race, sex, and culture are manipulated to undermine White self-perception**.
--- Demonstrates how **academic elites frame White decline as psychologically necessary or deserved**.
--- Provides ideological background for modern media trends that eroticize racial power imbalance.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
--1. Analyze how psychoanalytic language is used to **justify racial inversion in cultural dominance**.
--2. Examine the **role of pornography in demoralization campaigns** targeting White men.
--3. Explore how elite journals create **ideological cover for overt anti-White sentiment**.
--{{/expandable}}
--
--{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
--[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.Fink_Black_Penis_Demoralization.pdf]]
--{{/expandable}}
--{{/expandable}}
--
--
  {{expandable summary="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
  **Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
  **Date of Publication:** *2020*