Changes for page Research at a Glance
Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09
From 112.1 to 111.1
Show context
Hide context
Summary
Details
-
Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1254,15 +1254,9 @@ 1254 1254 {{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 1255 1255 1. Study whether **DEI training reduces false beliefs** or simply **induces White guilt**. 1256 1256 2. Investigate **biases against White rural patients**, especially regarding **opioid or pain management stigma**. 1257 -3. Conduct **clinical outcome studies**, not self-reported vignettes, to test **real-world disparities**. 1258 -{{/expandable}} 1257 +3. Conduct **clinical outcome studies**, not self-reported vignettes, to test **real-world disparities**. 1259 1259 1260 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 1261 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]] 1262 -{{/expandable}} 1263 -{{/expandable}} 1264 1264 1265 - 1266 1266 {{expandable summary="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}} 1267 1267 **Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)* 1268 1268 **Date of Publication:** *2015* ... ... @@ -1700,73 +1700,3 @@ 1700 1700 [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.2501_JAR-2022-028.pdf]] 1701 1701 {{/expandable}} 1702 1702 {{/expandable}} 1703 - 1704 -{{expandable summary="Study: Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice"}} 1705 -**Source:** *Journal of Communication* 1706 -**Date of Publication:** *2020* 1707 -**Author(s):** *John A. Banas, Lauren L. Miller, David A. Braddock, Sun Kyong Lee* 1708 -**Title:** *"Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice"* 1709 -**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqz032](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz032) 1710 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Psychology, Prejudice Reduction, Intergroup Relations* 1711 - 1712 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}} 1713 -1. **General Observations:** 1714 - - Aggregated **71 studies involving 27,000+ participants**. 1715 - - Focused on how **media portrayals of out-groups (primarily minorities)** affect attitudes among dominant in-groups (i.e., Whites). 1716 - 1717 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:** 1718 - - **Fictional entertainment** had stronger effects than news. 1719 - - **Positive portrayals of minorities** correlated with significant reductions in “prejudice”. 1720 - 1721 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:** 1722 - - Effects were stronger when minority characters were portrayed as **warm, competent, and morally relatable**. 1723 - - Contact was more effective when it mimicked **face-to-face friendship narratives**. 1724 -{{/expandable}} 1725 - 1726 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}} 1727 -1. **Primary Observations:** 1728 - - Media is a **powerful tool for shaping racial attitudes**, capable of reducing “prejudice” without real-world contact. 1729 - - **Repeated exposure** to positive portrayals of minorities led to increased acceptance and reduced negative bias. 1730 - 1731 -2. **Subgroup Trends:** 1732 - - **White participants** were the primary targets of reconditioning. 1733 - - Minority participants were not studied in terms of **prejudice against Whites**. 1734 - 1735 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:** 1736 - - “Parasocial” relationships with minority characters (TV/movie exposure) had comparable psychological effects to actual friendships. 1737 - - Media framing functioned as a **top-down mechanism for social engineering**, not just passive reflection of society. 1738 -{{/expandable}} 1739 - 1740 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}} 1741 -1. **Strengths of the Study:** 1742 - - High-quality quantitative meta-analysis with clear design and robust statistical handling. 1743 - - Acknowledges **media’s ability to alter long-held social beliefs** without physical contact. 1744 - 1745 -2. **Limitations of the Study:** 1746 - - Only defines “prejudice” as **negative attitudes from Whites toward minorities** — no exploration of anti-White media narratives or bias. 1747 - - Ignores the effects of **overexposure to minority portrayals** on cultural alienation or backlash. 1748 - - Assumes **assimilation into DEI norms is inherently positive**, and any reluctance to accept them is “prejudice”. 1749 - 1750 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:** 1751 - - Study reciprocal dynamics — how **minority media portrayals impact attitudes toward Whites**. 1752 - - Investigate whether constant valorization of minorities leads to **resentment, guilt, or political disengagement** among White viewers. 1753 - - Analyze **media saturation effects**, especially in multicultural propaganda and corporate DEI messaging. 1754 -{{/expandable}} 1755 - 1756 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}} 1757 -- Provides **direct evidence** that media is being used to **reshape racial attitudes** through emotional, parasocial contact. 1758 -- Reinforces concern that **“tolerance” is engineered via asymmetric emotional exposure**, not organic consensus. 1759 -- Useful for documenting how **Whiteness is often treated as a bias to be corrected**, not a culture to be respected. 1760 -{{/expandable}} 1761 - 1762 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}} 1763 -1. Investigate **reverse parasocial effects** — how negative portrayals of White men affect self-perception and mental health. 1764 -2. Study how **mass entertainment normalizes demographic shifts** and silences native concerns. 1765 -3. Compare effects of **Western vs. non-Western media systems** in promoting diversity narratives. 1766 -{{/expandable}} 1767 - 1768 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}} 1769 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:Banas et al. - 2020 - Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice.pdf]] 1770 -{{/expandable}} 1771 -{{/expandable}} 1772 -