0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From 112.1 to 113.1 From 120.1 to 121.1

From version

113.1

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/06/19 03:53

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version

120.1

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/06/19 06:04

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Attachments (0 modified, 2 added, 0 removed)
- Banas et al. - 2020 - Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice.pdf
- lai2014.pdf

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -647,6 +647,287 @@
  = Dating =
++{{expandable summary="Study: Positioning Multiraciality in Cyberspace – Treatment of Multiracial Daters in an Online Dating Website"}}
++**Source:** *Social Forces*
++**Date of Publication:** *2016*
++**Author(s):** *Stephanie M. Curington, Kevin K. Anderson, and Jennifer Glass*
++**Title:** *"Positioning Multiraciality in Cyberspace: Treatment of Multiracial Daters in an Online Dating Website"*
++**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow007](https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow007)
++**Subject Matter:** *Race and Dating, Multiracial Identity, Online Behavior*
++
++{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
++1. **General Observations:**
++   - Data drawn from **over 1 million messaging records** from an online dating site.
++   - Focused on how **monoracial users** (especially Whites) interact with **multiracial daters**.
++
++2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
++   - **Multiracial Black/White and Asian/White women** received **fewer responses from White men** than their monoracial counterparts.
++   - White daters showed **stronger preferences for monoracial identities**, particularly **own-race pairings**.
++
++3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
++   - **Multiracial men** fared worse than multiracial women across most pairings.
++   - **Latina/White and Asian/White multiracial women** were **more positively received by Black and Hispanic men**.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
++1. **Primary Observations:**
++   - White users demonstrated a clear pattern of **in-group preference**, preferring other White users (monoracial or partially White) over more ambiguous multiracial identities.
++   - Authors suggest this reflects **"boundary-maintaining behavior"** and **"latent racial bias"**.
++
++2. **Subgroup Trends:**
++   - **Multiracial women with partial minority backgrounds** were more acceptable to non-White men than White men.
++   - Multiracial daters were **often treated as ambiguous or “less desirable”** in ways the authors frame as **resistance to racial integration**.
++
++3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
++   - The most rejected group? **Black/White multiracial men**, especially by **White women**, which the authors do not frame as bias in the same way.
++   - The study shows **asymmetrical concern** — when Whites select inwardly, it's seen as racial boundary policing; when minorities do it, it's not pathologized.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
++1. **Strengths of the Study:**
++   - Large, real-world dataset gives useful behavioral insight into **racial preferences in dating**.
++   - Raises legitimate questions about **how race, desire, and group identity intersect**.
++
++2. **Limitations of the Study:**
++   - Frames **normal in-group preference among Whites as "resistance to multiraciality"**, rather than neutral human patterning.
++   - Ignores **similar or stronger in-group preference among Black and Asian users**, which could indicate *universal patterns*, not White exceptionalism.
++   - Uses CRT framing to subtly **morally indict Whites for preferring Whites**, while exempting other groups.
++
++3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
++   - Treat all in-group preference equally across racial groups — not just when Whites do it.
++   - Disaggregate by age, education, and regional variation to control for confounds.
++   - Consider whether **multiracial identity is ambiguous** by nature and if that ambiguity reduces clarity of signals in dating.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
++- Provides a data point in the **ongoing academic effort to pathologize White selectiveness**, even in private, personal domains like dating.
++- Demonstrates how **racial preferences are only considered “problematic” when they preserve White group boundaries**.
++- Supports analysis of **how DEI-aligned narratives seek to dissolve in-group loyalty under the guise of openness and inclusion**.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
++1. Investigate how **media and dating platforms reinforce multiracialism as normative** despite evidence of natural in-group selection.
++2. Study the **psychological effects of being told your preferences are morally wrong if you're White**.
++3. Explore how **multiracial identities are strategically framed** depending on political or cultural goals — exoticization, integration, or guilt projection.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
++[[Download Full Study>>attach:Curington et al. - Positioning Multiraciality in Cyberspace Treatment of Multiracial Daters in an Online Dating Websit.pdf]]
++{{/expandable}}
++{{/expandable}}
++
++
++{{expandable summary="Study: The White Man’s Burden: Gonzo Pornography and the Construction of Black Masculinity"}}
++**Source:** *Porn Studies*
++**Date of Publication:** *2015*
++**Author(s):** *Noah Tsika*
++**Title:** *"The White Man’s Burden: Gonzo Pornography and the Construction of Black Masculinity"*
++**DOI:** [10.1080/23268743.2015.1025389](https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2015.1025389)
++**Subject Matter:** *Pornography Studies, Race and Sexuality, Cultural Critique*
++
++{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
++1. **General Observations:**
++   - This is a **qualitative content analysis** of gonzo pornography, particularly interracial porn involving Black men and White women.
++   - The author reviews **select films, not a dataset**, using them to extrapolate broad cultural claims about race and sexuality.
++
++2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
++   - Claims that **interracial porn “others” and dehumanizes Black men**, yet selectively **frames Black male sexual aggression as liberatory**.
++   - The author accuses White male consumers of **fetishizing Black men** as both threats and tools for their own “colonial guilt.”
++
++3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
++   - No empirical evidence, just interpretive readings of scenes and film dialogue.
++   - Repeatedly criticizes **White directors and actors** as complicit in perpetuating “White supremacy through porn.”
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
++1. **Primary Observations:**
++   - Argues that **gonzo interracial porn functions as racial propaganda**, reinforcing White guilt while commodifying Black masculinity.
++   - Portrays White women as willing participants in a fantasy of racial domination that allegedly “liberates” Black men.
++
++2. **Subgroup Trends:**
++   - White male viewers are pathologized as both sexually repressed and voyeuristically complicit in anti-Black racism.
++   - Black male performers are framed as both victims of racial commodification and **agents of resistance through hypersexuality**.
++
++3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
++   - Cites scenes where Black male actors degrade or dominate White women as **“transgressive acts” that destabilize White power**, rather than examples of racial hostility or objectification.
++   - The narrative treats **racially charged sexual violence as deconstructive**, only when it reverses traditional racial dynamics.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
++1. **Strengths of the Study:**
++   - Useful in showcasing how **critical race theory invades even the most apolitical domains** (porn consumption) and turns them into race war battlegrounds.
++   - Offers insight into how **White heterosexuality is recoded as colonialism** in activist academia.
++
++2. **Limitations of the Study:**
++   - **No statistical basis**, relies entirely on biased interpretive analysis of fringe media.
++   - Presumes **intent and audience motivation** without surveys, viewership data, or cross-cultural comparison.
++   - Treats Black aggression as empowering and White sexuality as inherently oppressive — a double standard.
++
++3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
++   - Include comparative data on how different racial groups are portrayed in pornography across genres.
++   - Analyze how **minority-run porn studios frame interracial themes** — not just White-directed media.
++   - Address how racial fetishization **harms all groups**, not just Black men.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
++- Exemplifies how **racialized sexual narratives are reinterpreted to indict White identity**, even in consumer entertainment.
++- Shows how **DEI and CRT frameworks are applied to pornographic material** to pathologize White maleness while sanctifying non-White hypermasculinity.
++- Highlights the **academic bias that treats transgressive content as empowering when it serves anti-White narratives**.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
++1. Study how **interracial porn narratives differ when produced by non-White vs. White directors**.
++2. Examine **how racial power is portrayed in same-sex vs. heterosexual interracial porn**.
++3. Investigate whether the **fetishization of Black masculinity fuels unrealistic expectations and destructive stereotypes** for both Black and White men.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
++[[Download Full Study>>attach:Dinest - The White Man's Burden Gonzo Pornography and the Construction of Black Masculinity.pdf]]
++{{/expandable}}
++{{/expandable}}
++
++
++{{expandable summary="Study: Gendered Racial Exclusion Among White Internet Daters"}}
++**Source:** *Social Science Research*
++**Date of Publication:** *2009*
++**Author(s):** *Cynthia Feliciano, Belinda Robnett, Golnaz Komaie*
++**Title:** *"Gendered Racial Exclusion Among White Internet Daters"*
++**DOI:** [10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.04.004](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.04.004)
++**Subject Matter:** *Online Dating, Racial Preferences, CRT Framing of White Intimacy*
++
++{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
++1. **General Observations:**
++   - Based on data from **Love@aol.com**, analyzing **over 6,000 profiles** from California.
++   - The study investigated **racial preferences listed explicitly** in dating profiles.
++
++2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
++   - **White women were least likely to express openness to interracial dating**, particularly with Black and Asian men.
++   - **White men also showed exclusion**, but were more open than White women.
++
++3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
++   - The authors labeled preference for one’s own race as **“racial exclusion”**.
++   - Profiles by non-White users expressing same-race preferences were **not similarly problematized**.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
++1. **Primary Observations:**
++   - **White in-group preference was framed as discriminatory**, regardless of intent or context.
++   - Dating preferences were interpreted as a **“reinforcement of racial hierarchies”**.
++
++2. **Subgroup Trends:**
++   - The study suggested **White women’s selectivity** stemmed from **cultural and structural advantages**, implying racial gatekeeping.
++   - Did not critically examine **non-White preferences** for their own race.
++
++3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
++   - Highlighted that **Latina and Asian women were more open to White men** than to men of their own ethnicity, which was not treated as exclusionary.
++   - **No racial preference was criticized except when it protected White boundaries.**
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
++1. **Strengths of the Study:**
++   - Large dataset from real-world dating profiles.
++   - Provides rare insight into **gendered patterns of racial preference**.
++
++2. **Limitations of the Study:**
++   - **Frames personal preference as political discrimination** when expressed by White users.
++   - **Fails to control for cultural compatibility, attraction patterns, or religious values.**
++   - **Double standard** in analysis — **non-White selectivity is ignored or justified.**
++
++3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
++   - Should distinguish **racial animus from in-group preference**.
++   - Include **psychological, aesthetic, and cultural compatibility data**.
++   - Apply **equal critical lens to all racial groups**, not just Whites.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
++- Reinforces how CRT-aligned research pathologizes **White in-group dating preferences**.
++- Supports the claim that **White intimacy boundaries are uniquely scrutinized** and politicized.
++- Demonstrates how even non-political behavior (e.g., dating) is racialized when it involves Whites.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
++1. Study how **dating preferences vary by upbringing, media influence, and culture**, not just race.
++2. Analyze **racial preferences across all groups** with equal rigor and skepticism.
++3. Examine the **mental health impact of stigmatizing in-group preference** among Whites.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
++[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.ssresearch.2009.04.004.pdf]]
++{{/expandable}}
++{{/expandable}}
++
++
++{{expandable summary="Study: Black Penis and the Demoralization of the Western World"}}
++**Source:** *Journal of European Psychoanalysis*
++**Date of Publication:** *2009*
++**Author(s):** *Kristen Fink* *Jewish*))
++**Title:** *"Black Penis and the Demoralization of the Western World: Sexual relationships between black men and white women as a cause of decline"*
++**DOI:** *Unavailable – Psychoanalytic essay publication*
++**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sexuality, Psychoanalysis, Cultural Demoralization*
++
++{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
++1. **General Observations:**
++   - This is a **psychoanalytic essay**, not an empirical study.
++   - Uses **Freudian and Lacanian theory** to explore symbolic meanings of interracial sex.
++   - Frames **Black male–White female pairings** as psychologically disruptive to the White male ego and Western civilization.
++
++2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
++   - Positions **Black men as symbolic rivals** to emasculated Western (White) men.
++   - **White women’s interracial attraction** is framed as rebellion or rejection of Western order.
++
++3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
++   - The essay proposes that **sexual representation in media** is demoralizing to White culture.
++   - Uses **high theory language** to justify what is ultimately an anti-White cultural narrative.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
++1. **Primary Observations:**
++   - **Interracial sexual dynamics** are framed as central to **Western decline**.
++   - **White masculinity is portrayed as passive, obsolete, or neurotic** in contrast to hypermasculinized Blackness.
++
++2. **Subgroup Trends:**
++   - Suggests White men internalize emasculation through exposure to interracial symbolism.
++   - Sees **cultural loss of confidence** in White society as stemming from racial-sexual symbolism.
++
++3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
++   - Analyzes media tropes (e.g., interracial porn, pop culture) through the lens of psychoanalytic guilt and transgression.
++   - Never critiques the **ideological project of glorifying Blackness at the expense of White identity**.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
++1. **Strengths of the Study:**
++   - Reveals how **elite academic disciplines like psychoanalysis** are used to mask anti-White narratives in esoteric jargon.
++   - Serves as **ideological evidence** of demoralization tactics embedded in cultural theory.
++
++2. **Limitations of the Study:**
++   - No empirical data, surveys, or statistical analysis — purely speculative.
++   - **Does not critique hypersexualization of Black men** or the dehumanizing aspects of the fetish.
++   - Assumes **White masculinity must passively accept its symbolic erasure** as psychoanalytically “natural.”
++
++3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
++   - Include **perspectives from White men and women** on how these portrayals affect their psychological well-being.
++   - Disentangle psychoanalytic theory from **racial guilt ideology**.
++   - Explore **mutual respect-based frameworks** for interracial dynamics rather than ones rooted in humiliation or power symbolism.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
++- Illustrates how **race, sex, and culture are manipulated to undermine White self-perception**.
++- Demonstrates how **academic elites frame White decline as psychologically necessary or deserved**.
++- Provides ideological background for modern media trends that eroticize racial power imbalance.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
++1. Analyze how psychoanalytic language is used to **justify racial inversion in cultural dominance**.
++2. Examine the **role of pornography in demoralization campaigns** targeting White men.
++3. Explore how elite journals create **ideological cover for overt anti-White sentiment**.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
++[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.Fink_Black_Penis_Demoralization.pdf]]
++{{/expandable}}
++{{/expandable}}
++
++
  {{expandable summary="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
  **Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
  **Date of Publication:** *2020*
@@ -1122,6 +1122,76 @@
  = Whiteness & White Guilt =
++{{expandable summary="Study: Reducing Implicit Racial Preferences: I. A Comparative Investigation of 17 Interventions"}}
++**Source:** *Psychological Science*
++**Date of Publication:** *2014*
++**Author(s):** *Caleb E. Lai, Anthony G. Greenwald, et al.*
++**Title:** *"Reducing Implicit Racial Preferences: I. A Comparative Investigation of 17 Interventions"*
++**DOI:** [10.1177/0956797614535812](https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614535812)
++**Subject Matter:** *Implicit Bias, Racial Psychology, Psychological Conditioning*
++
++{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
++1. **General Observations:**
++   - Tested **17 different interventions** across **6,321 participants**, all measured via IAT (Implicit Association Test).
++   - Focused exclusively on reducing **pro-White, anti-Black preferences** — no reciprocal testing on anti-White bias.
++
++2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
++   - Educational and exposure-based interventions (e.g., multiculturalism, egalitarian messaging) failed to reduce bias significantly.
++   - Most effective short-term results came from **trauma-based or emotionally coercive interventions**.
++
++3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
++   - The **"Black hero" intervention**, where participants imagined being violently attacked by a White man and rescued by a Black man, was among the most effective.
++   - Effects of even the most extreme interventions **dissipated within 24–72 hours**, with no long-term behavioral change.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
++1. **Primary Observations:**
++   - The interventions that produced the most dramatic IAT changes used **emotionally graphic narratives** depicting Whites as violent aggressors and Blacks as saviors.
++   - Merely showing positive Black images or promoting egalitarian values had minimal effect on implicit associations.
++
++2. **Subgroup Trends:**
++   - In the **"Black hero" condition**, participants were asked to imagine being physically beaten by a White person and then rescued by a Black person — an intentionally vivid and disturbing scenario.
++   - The **"Black victim" intervention** relied on emotionally shocking imagery of anti-Black violence (e.g., lynching) to induce guilt and disrupt positive associations with Whiteness.
++
++3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
++   - None of the scenarios reversed the framing (e.g., Black aggressor/White victim), confirming the ideological goal was **to degrade White identity**, not merely reduce bias.
++   - The study was **cited by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)** to justify DEI-aligned policy recommendations.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
++1. **Strengths of the Study:**
++   - Large sample size and systematic comparison across diverse intervention types.
++   - Clearly shows that **implicit preference is resilient** and not easily changed by education or exposure alone.
++
++2. **Limitations of the Study:**
++   - The most “effective” methods **relied on emotional manipulation, not persuasion or evidence**.
++   - Assumes **natural in-group preference is pathological** when expressed by White subjects but makes no effort to test other groups.
++   - **Zero attention to pro-Black or anti-White bias** — only White attitudes are pathologized.
++
++3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
++   - Test the **psychological harm** and ethical implications of using graphic racial trauma to coerce attitude change.
++   - Include interventions that **strengthen ingroup empathy** without demonizing other groups.
++   - Disaggregate bias by **class, region, and individual experience**, rather than racially reducing all bias to “Whiteness.”
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
++- Provides direct evidence that **DEI-style implicit bias training** is based on emotionally abusive and **anti-White psychological framing**.
++- Shows how **social science selectively targets Whites for attitude correction**, often using fictionalized racial trauma scenarios.
++- Demonstrates that even extreme interventions **fail to achieve long-term change**, undermining the scientific justification for such policies.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
++1. Investigate **implicit bias training outcomes** in real-world institutional settings.
++2. Study **the ethical limits of psychological reprogramming** in DEI policies.
++3. Explore **natural ingroup preference across all races** using morally neutral frameworks.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
++[[Download Full Study>>attach:lai2014.pdf]]
++{{/expandable}}
++{{/expandable}}
++
++
  {{expandable summary="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
  **Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
  **Date of Publication:** *2019*
@@ -1700,3 +1700,139 @@
  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.2501_JAR-2022-028.pdf]]
  {{/expandable}}
  {{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="Study: Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice"}}
++**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
++**Date of Publication:** *2020*
++**Author(s):** *John A. Banas, Lauren L. Miller, David A. Braddock, Sun Kyong Lee*
++**Title:** *"Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice"*
++**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqz032](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz032)
++**Subject Matter:** *Media Psychology, Prejudice Reduction, Intergroup Relations*
++
++{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
++1. **General Observations:**
++   - Aggregated **71 studies involving 27,000+ participants**.
++   - Focused on how **media portrayals of out-groups (primarily minorities)** affect attitudes among dominant in-groups (i.e., Whites).
++
++2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
++   - **Fictional entertainment** had stronger effects than news.
++   - **Positive portrayals of minorities** correlated with significant reductions in “prejudice”.
++
++3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
++   - Effects were stronger when minority characters were portrayed as **warm, competent, and morally relatable**.
++   - Contact was more effective when it mimicked **face-to-face friendship narratives**.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
++1. **Primary Observations:**
++   - Media is a **powerful tool for shaping racial attitudes**, capable of reducing “prejudice” without real-world contact.
++   - **Repeated exposure** to positive portrayals of minorities led to increased acceptance and reduced negative bias.
++
++2. **Subgroup Trends:**
++   - **White participants** were the primary targets of reconditioning.
++   - Minority participants were not studied in terms of **prejudice against Whites**.
++
++3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
++   - “Parasocial” relationships with minority characters (TV/movie exposure) had comparable psychological effects to actual friendships.
++   - Media framing functioned as a **top-down mechanism for social engineering**, not just passive reflection of society.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
++1. **Strengths of the Study:**
++   - High-quality quantitative meta-analysis with clear design and robust statistical handling.
++   - Acknowledges **media’s ability to alter long-held social beliefs** without physical contact.
++
++2. **Limitations of the Study:**
++   - Only defines “prejudice” as **negative attitudes from Whites toward minorities** — no exploration of anti-White media narratives or bias.
++   - Ignores the effects of **overexposure to minority portrayals** on cultural alienation or backlash.
++   - Assumes **assimilation into DEI norms is inherently positive**, and any reluctance to accept them is “prejudice”.
++
++3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
++   - Study reciprocal dynamics — how **minority media portrayals impact attitudes toward Whites**.
++   - Investigate whether constant valorization of minorities leads to **resentment, guilt, or political disengagement** among White viewers.
++   - Analyze **media saturation effects**, especially in multicultural propaganda and corporate DEI messaging.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
++- Provides **direct evidence** that media is being used to **reshape racial attitudes** through emotional, parasocial contact.
++- Reinforces concern that **“tolerance” is engineered via asymmetric emotional exposure**, not organic consensus.
++- Useful for documenting how **Whiteness is often treated as a bias to be corrected**, not a culture to be respected.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
++1. Investigate **reverse parasocial effects** — how negative portrayals of White men affect self-perception and mental health.
++2. Study how **mass entertainment normalizes demographic shifts** and silences native concerns.
++3. Compare effects of **Western vs. non-Western media systems** in promoting diversity narratives.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
++[[Download Full Study>>attach:Banas et al. - 2020 - Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice.pdf]]
++{{/expandable}}
++{{/expandable}}
++
++
++{{expandable summary="Study: Cultural Voyeurism – A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Interaction"}}
++**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
++**Date of Publication:** *2018*
++**Author(s):** *Osei Appiah*
++**Title:** *"Cultural Voyeurism: A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Interaction"*
++**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
++**Subject Matter:** *Intergroup contact, racial stereotypes, media, identity formation*
++
++{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
++1. **No empirical dataset** — this is a theoretical framework paper, not a quantitative study.
++2. **Heavily cites prior empirical work**, including:
++   - Czopp & Monteith (2006) on “complimentary stereotypes”
++   - Armstrong et al. (1992), Entman & Rojecki (2000) on media distortion of race
++   - Pettigrew et al. (2011) on intergroup contact
++
++3. **Statistical implications:** Repeatedly emphasizes the role of media in shaping racial beliefs when direct interracial contact is absent.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
++1. **Primary Observations:**
++   - Defines *cultural voyeurism* as the process of using media to observe and learn about other racial/ethnic groups.
++   - Claims it can both reinforce stereotypes and reduce prejudice depending on context.
++   - Suggests that Whites’ fascination with Black culture (e.g., hip-hop, athleticism) is a driver of empathy and improved race relations.
++
++2. **Subgroup Trends:**
++   - White youth are singled out as cultural voyeurs increasingly emulating Black identity for social cachet (“coolness”).
++   - Positive media portrayals of Blacks (e.g., in entertainment) said to reduce racial bias.
++
++3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
++   - No case study provided, but mentions “Duck Dynasty” and “hip-hop culture” as stereotyped White/Black identity constructs respectively.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
++1. **Strengths of the Study:**
++   - Recognizes media’s dual role in shaping intergroup perception.
++   - Accurately captures the obsession with racial “coolness” as a social phenomenon.
++
++2. **Limitations of the Study:**
++   - Frames White identification with Black culture as inherently progressive, ignoring issues of **anti-White displacement**.
++   - Treats *positive stereotypes of minorities* (e.g., athleticism, musicality) as meaningful substitutes for structural reality.
++   - Lacks any meaningful inquiry into *reverse cultural voyeurism* (i.e., non-Whites voyeuristically consuming and appropriating White identity or values).
++
++3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
++   - Should confront whether “cultural voyeurism” ultimately erodes group boundaries and majority cultural integrity.
++   - Needs empirical validation of claims.
++   - Avoids uncomfortable realities about how White identity is increasingly stigmatized in media — which undermines genuine empathy or parity.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
++- Helps explain how **media conditioning** primes young Whites to *admire, emulate, and eventually submit* to Black cultural dominance.
++- Directly supports the narrative that **pro-White identity is systematically delegitimized**, while pro-Black identity is commodified and glamorized — then sold back to White youth.
++- Useful in chapters/sections covering cultural appropriation *in reverse* — not by Whites, but **of Whiteness** by outsiders for critique and exploitation.
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
++1. Are there longitudinal studies showing cultural voyeurism weakening in-group preference among Whites?
++2. Does this phenomenon correspond to decreased fertility, civic participation, or political alignment with group interest?
++3. How do non-Western societies handle voyeuristic consumption of majority culture — do they permit or punish it?
++{{/expandable}}
++
++{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
++[[Download Full Study>>attach:Cultural Voyeurism A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Intera.pdf]]
++{{/expandable}}
++{{/expandable}}
++

Banas et al. - 2020 - Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice.pdf

Author

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+XWiki.AdminAngriff

Size

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+472.9 KB

Content

lai2014.pdf

Author

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+XWiki.AdminAngriff

Size

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+15.4 MB

Content

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Summary

Details

Quick Links

Categories