0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 111.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/06/19 03:15
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 76.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/16 05:33
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Parent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -Main Categories.Science & Research.WebHome
1 +Main.Studies.WebHome
Content
... ... @@ -1,516 +1,554 @@
1 -{{toc/}}
1 += Research at a Glance =
2 2  
3 +== Introduction ==
3 3  
4 -= Research at a Glance =
5 +Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various fields such as **social psychology, public policy, behavioral economics, and more**. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout.
5 5  
7 +=== How to Use This Repository ===
6 6  
9 +- Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
10 +- Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
11 +- Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
12 +- If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
7 7  
8 - Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various important Racial themes. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout. I wanted to make this for a couple of reasons. Number one is organization. There are a ton of useful studies out there that expose the truth, sometimes inadvertently. You'll notice that in this initial draft the summaries are often woke and reflect the bias of the AI writing them as well as the researchers politically correct conclusion in most cases. That's because I haven't gotten to going through and pointing out the reasons I put all of them in here.
9 9  
10 10  
11 - There is often an underlying hypocrisy or double standard, saying the quiet part out loud, or conclusions that are so much of an antithesis to what the data shows that made me want to include it. At least, thats the idea for once its polished. I have about 150 more studies to upload, so it will be a few weeks before I get through it all. Until such time, feel free to search for them yourself and edit in what you find, or add your own studies. If you like you can do it manually, or if you'd rather go the route I did, just rename the study to its doi number and feed the study into an AI and tell them to summarize the study using the following format:
16 +== Research Studies Repository ==
12 12  
13 13  
19 += Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding =
20 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
21 +**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
22 +**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
23 +**Author(s):** Smith et al.
24 +**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
25 +**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
26 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
14 14  
15 -- Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
16 -- Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
17 -- Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
18 -- If needed, you can export this page as **PDF or print-friendly format**, and all studies will automatically expand for readability.
19 -- You'll also find a download link to the original full study in pdf form at the bottom of the collapsible block.
28 +**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
20 20  
30 +=== **Key Statistics** ===
21 21  
32 +1. **General Observations:**
33 + - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
34 + - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
22 22  
23 -= Genetics =
36 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
37 + - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
38 + - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
24 24  
25 -{{expandable summary="
40 +=== **Findings** ===
26 26  
27 -Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
28 -**Source:** *Nature*
29 -**Date of Publication:** *2009*
30 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
31 -**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
32 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
33 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
42 +- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
43 +- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
34 34  
35 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
45 +=== **Relevance to Subproject** ===
46 +
47 +- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
48 +- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
49 +{{/expand}}
50 +
51 +{{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
52 +**Source:** [Journal/Institution Name]
53 +**Date of Publication:** [Publication Date]
54 +**Author(s):** [Author(s) Name(s)]
55 +**Title:** "[Study Title]"
56 +**DOI:** [DOI or Link]
57 +**Subject Matter:** [Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]
58 +
59 +---
60 +
61 +## **Key Statistics**
36 36  1. **General Observations:**
37 - - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
38 - - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
63 + - [Statistical finding or observation]
64 + - [Statistical finding or observation]
39 39  
40 40  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
41 - - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
42 - - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
67 + - [Breakdown of findings by gender, race, or other subgroups]
43 43  
44 44  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
45 - - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
46 - - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
47 -{{/expandable}}
70 + - [Any additional findings or significant statistics]
48 48  
49 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
72 +---
73 +
74 +## **Findings**
50 50  1. **Primary Observations:**
51 - - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
52 - - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
76 + - [High-level findings or trends in the study]
53 53  
54 54  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
55 - - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
56 - - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
79 + - [Disparities or differences highlighted in the study]
57 57  
58 58  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
59 - - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
60 - - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
61 -{{/expandable}}
82 + - [Detailed explanation of any notable specific findings]
62 62  
63 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
84 +---
85 +
86 +## **Critique and Observations**
64 64  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
65 - - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
66 - - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
88 + - [Examples: strong methodology, large dataset, etc.]
67 67  
68 68  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
69 - - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
70 - - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
91 + - [Examples: data gaps, lack of upstream analysis, etc.]
71 71  
72 72  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
73 - - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
74 - - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
75 -{{/expandable}}
94 + - [Ideas for further research or addressing limitations]
76 76  
77 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
78 -- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
79 -- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
80 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
81 -{{/expandable}}
96 +---
82 82  
83 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
84 -1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
85 -2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
86 -3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
87 -{{/expandable}}
98 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
99 +- [Explanation of how this study contributes to your subproject goals.]
100 +- [Any key arguments or findings that support or challenge your views.]
88 88  
89 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
90 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
91 -{{/expandable}}
92 -{{/expandable}}
102 +---
93 93  
94 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
95 -**Source:** *Nature*
96 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
97 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
98 -**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
99 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
100 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
104 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
105 +1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
106 +2. [Potential studies or sources to complement this analysis.]
101 101  
102 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
103 -1. **General Observations:**
104 - - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
105 - - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
108 +---
106 106  
107 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
108 - - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
109 - - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
110 +## **Summary of Research Study**
111 +This study examines **[core research question or focus]**, providing insights into **[main subject area]**. The research utilized **[sample size and methodology]** to assess **[key variables or measured outcomes]**.
110 110  
111 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
112 - - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
113 - - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
114 -{{/expandable}}
113 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
115 115  
116 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
117 -1. **Primary Observations:**
118 - - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
119 - - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
115 +---
120 120  
121 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
122 - - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
123 - - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
117 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
118 +{{velocity}}
119 +#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
120 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
121 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
122 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
123 +#else
124 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
125 +#end
126 +{{/velocity}}
124 124  
125 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
126 - - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
127 - - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
128 -{{/expandable}}
128 +{{/expand}}
129 129  
130 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
131 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
132 - - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
133 - - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
130 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
134 134  
135 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
136 - - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
137 - - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
138 138  
139 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
140 - - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
141 - - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
142 -{{/expandable}}
143 143  
144 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
145 -- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
146 -- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
147 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
148 -{{/expandable}}
134 +---
149 149  
150 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
151 -1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
152 -2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
153 -3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
154 -{{/expandable}}
136 +{{expand title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018" expanded="false"}}
137 +**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
138 +**Date of Publication:** *2020*
139 +**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
140 +**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
141 +**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
142 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*
155 155  
156 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
157 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
158 -{{/expandable}}
159 -{{/expandable}}
144 +---
160 160  
161 -{{expandable summary="
162 -
163 -Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
164 -**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
165 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
166 -**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
167 -**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
168 -**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
169 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
170 -
171 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
146 +## **Key Statistics**
172 172  1. **General Observations:**
173 - - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
174 - - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
148 + - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
149 + - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
175 175  
176 176  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
177 - - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
178 - - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
152 + - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
153 + - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
179 179  
180 180  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
181 - - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
182 - - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
183 -{{/expandable}}
156 + - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
157 + - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
184 184  
185 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
159 +---
160 +
161 +## **Findings**
186 186  1. **Primary Observations:**
187 - - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
188 - - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
163 + - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
164 + - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
189 189  
190 190  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
191 - - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (70-80%)**.
192 - - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
167 + - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
168 + - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
193 193  
194 194  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
195 - - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
196 - - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
197 -{{/expandable}}
171 + - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
172 + - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
198 198  
199 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
174 +---
175 +
176 +## **Critique and Observations**
200 200  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
201 - - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
202 - - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
178 + - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
179 + - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
203 203  
204 204  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
205 - - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
206 - - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
182 + - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
183 + - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
207 207  
208 208  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
209 - - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
210 - - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
211 -{{/expandable}}
186 + - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
187 + - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
212 212  
213 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
214 -- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
215 -- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
216 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
217 -{{/expandable}}
189 +---
218 218  
219 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
220 -1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
221 -2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
222 -3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
223 -{{/expandable}}
191 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
192 +- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
193 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
224 224  
225 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
226 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
227 -{{/expandable}}
228 -{{/expandable}}
195 +---
229 229  
230 -{{expandable summary="
197 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
198 +1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
199 +2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
231 231  
232 -Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
233 -**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
234 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
235 -**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
236 -**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
237 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
238 -**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
201 +---
239 239  
240 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
203 +## **Summary of Research Study**
204 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.
205 +
206 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
207 +
208 +---
209 +
210 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
211 +{{velocity}}
212 +#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
213 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
214 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
215 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
216 +#else
217 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
218 +#end
219 +{{/velocity}}
220 +
221 +{{/expand}}
222 +
223 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
224 +
225 +
226 +{{expand title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness" expanded="false"}}
227 +**Source:** *Current Psychology*
228 +**Date of Publication:** *2024*
229 +**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
230 +**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
231 +**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
232 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
233 +
234 +---
235 +
236 +## **Key Statistics**
241 241  1. **General Observations:**
242 - - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
243 - - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
238 + - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
239 + - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
244 244  
245 245  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
246 - - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
247 - - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
242 + - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
243 + - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
248 248  
249 249  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
250 - - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
251 - - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
252 -{{/expandable}}
246 + - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
247 + - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
253 253  
254 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
249 +---
250 +
251 +## **Findings**
255 255  1. **Primary Observations:**
256 - - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
257 - - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
253 + - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
254 + - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
258 258  
259 259  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
260 - - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
261 - - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
257 + - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
258 + - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
262 262  
263 263  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
264 - - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
265 - - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
266 -{{/expandable}}
261 + - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
262 + - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
267 267  
268 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
264 +---
265 +
266 +## **Critique and Observations**
269 269  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
270 - - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
271 - - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
268 + - **First quantitative study** on incels social isolation and mental health.
269 + - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
272 272  
273 273  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
274 - - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
275 - - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
272 + - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
273 + - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
276 276  
277 277  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
278 - - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
279 - - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
280 -{{/expandable}}
276 + - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
277 + - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
281 281  
282 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
283 -- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
284 -- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
285 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
286 -{{/expandable}}
279 +---
287 287  
288 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
289 -1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
290 -2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
291 -3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
292 -{{/expandable}}
281 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
282 +- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
283 +- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
284 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
293 293  
294 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
295 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
296 -{{/expandable}}
297 -{{/expandable}}
286 +---
298 298  
299 -{{expandable summary="
288 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
289 +1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
290 +2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
291 +3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
300 300  
301 -Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
302 -**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
303 -**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
304 -**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
305 -**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
306 -**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
307 -**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*
293 +---
308 308  
309 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
310 -1. **General Observations:**
311 - - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
312 - - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
295 +## **Summary of Research Study**
296 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.
313 313  
314 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
315 - - Examines **West Eurasian populations** and their genetic evolution.
316 - - Tracks **changes in allele frequencies over millennia**.
298 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
317 317  
318 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
319 - - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
320 - - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
321 -{{/expandable}}
300 +---
322 322  
323 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
324 -1. **Primary Observations:**
325 - - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
326 - - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
302 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
303 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
327 327  
328 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
329 - - Selection pressure on **energy storage genes** supports the **Thrifty Gene Hypothesis**.
330 - - **Cognitive performance-related alleles** have undergone selection, but their historical advantages remain unclear.
305 +{{/expand}}
331 331  
332 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
333 - - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
334 - - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
335 - - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
336 -{{/expandable}}
307 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
337 337  
338 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
339 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
340 - - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
341 - - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
309 +{{expand title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults" expanded="false"}} Source: Addictive Behaviors
310 +Date of Publication: 2016
311 +Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
312 +Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
313 +DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
314 +Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
342 342  
343 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
344 - - Findings **may not translate directly** to modern populations.
345 - - **Unclear whether observed selection pressures persist today**.
316 +Key Statistics
317 +General Observations:
346 346  
347 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
348 - - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
349 - - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
350 -{{/expandable}}
319 +Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
320 +Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
321 +Subgroup Analysis:
351 351  
352 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
353 -- Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
354 -- Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
355 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.
356 -{{/expandable}}
323 +Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
324 +Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
325 +Other Significant Data Points:
357 357  
358 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
359 -1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
360 -2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
361 -3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
362 -{{/expandable}}
327 +Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
328 +Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
329 +Findings
330 +Primary Observations:
363 363  
364 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
365 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]
366 -{{/expandable}}
367 -{{/expandable}}
332 +Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
333 +Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
334 +Subgroup Trends:
368 368  
369 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
370 -**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
371 -**Date of Publication:** *2013*
372 -**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
373 -**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
374 -**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
375 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
336 +Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
337 +College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
338 +Specific Case Analysis:
376 376  
377 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
340 +Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
341 +Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
342 +Critique and Observations
343 +Strengths of the Study:
344 +
345 +Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
346 +Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
347 +Limitations of the Study:
348 +
349 +Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
350 +Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
351 +Suggestions for Improvement:
352 +
353 +Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
354 +Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
355 +Relevance to Subproject
356 +Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
357 +Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
358 +Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
359 +Suggestions for Further Exploration
360 +Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
361 +Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
362 +Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
363 +Summary of Research Study
364 +This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
365 +
366 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
367 +
368 +📄 Download Full Study
369 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
370 +
371 +{{/expand}}
372 +
373 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
374 +
375 +{{expand title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?" expanded="false"}}
376 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
377 +**Date of Publication:** *2014*
378 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
379 +**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
380 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
381 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
382 +
383 +---
384 +
385 +## **Key Statistics**
378 378  1. **General Observations:**
379 - - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
380 - - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
387 + - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
388 + - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
381 381  
382 382  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
383 - - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
384 - - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
391 + - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
392 + - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
385 385  
386 386  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
387 - - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
388 - - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
389 -{{/expandable}}
395 + - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
396 + - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
390 390  
391 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
398 +---
399 +
400 +## **Findings**
392 392  1. **Primary Observations:**
393 - - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
394 - - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
402 + - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
403 + - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
395 395  
396 396  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
397 - - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
398 - - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
406 + - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
407 + - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
399 399  
400 400  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
401 - - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
402 - - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
403 -{{/expandable}}
410 + - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
411 + - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
404 404  
405 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
413 +---
414 +
415 +## **Critique and Observations**
406 406  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
407 - - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
408 - - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
417 + - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
418 + - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
409 409  
410 410  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
411 - - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
412 - - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
421 + - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
422 + - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
413 413  
414 414  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
415 - - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
416 - - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
417 -{{/expandable}}
425 + - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
426 + - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
418 418  
419 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
420 -- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
421 -- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
422 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
423 -{{/expandable}}
428 +---
424 424  
425 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
426 -1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
427 -2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
428 -3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
429 -{{/expandable}}
430 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
431 +- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
432 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
433 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
430 430  
431 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
432 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
433 -{{/expandable}}
434 -{{/expandable}}
435 +---
435 435  
436 -{{expandable summary="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
437 -**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
438 -**Date of Publication:** *2010*
439 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
440 -**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
441 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
442 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
437 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
438 +1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
439 +2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
440 +3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
443 443  
444 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
442 +---
443 +
444 +## **Summary of Research Study**
445 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.
446 +
447 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
448 +
449 +---
450 +
451 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
452 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
453 +
454 +{{/expand}}
455 +
456 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
457 +
458 +{{expand title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation" expanded="false"}}
459 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
460 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
461 +**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
462 +**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
463 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
464 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
465 +
466 +---
467 +
468 +## **Key Statistics**
445 445  1. **General Observations:**
446 - - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
447 - - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
470 + - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
471 + - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
448 448  
449 449  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
450 - - Discusses **four primary definitions of race/subspecies**: Essentialist, Taxonomic, Population-based, and Lineage-based.
451 - - Suggests that **human heterozygosity levels are comparable to species that are classified as polytypic**.
474 + - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
475 + - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
452 452  
453 453  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
454 - - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
455 - - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
456 -{{/expandable}}
478 + - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
479 + - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
457 457  
458 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
481 +---
482 +
483 +## **Findings**
459 459  1. **Primary Observations:**
460 - - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
461 - - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
485 + - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
486 + - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
462 462  
463 463  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
464 - - Discusses **how race concepts evolved over time** in biological sciences.
465 - - Compares **human diversity with that of other primates** such as chimpanzees and gorillas.
489 + - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
490 + - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
466 466  
467 467  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
468 - - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
469 - - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
470 -{{/expandable}}
493 + - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
494 + - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
471 471  
472 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
496 +---
497 +
498 +## **Critique and Observations**
473 473  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
474 - - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
475 - - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
500 + - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
501 + - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
476 476  
477 477  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
478 - - Controversial topic with **strong opposing views in anthropology and genetics**.
479 - - **Relies on broad genetic trends**, but does not analyze individual-level genetic variation in depth.
504 + - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
505 + - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
480 480  
481 481  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
482 - - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
483 - - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
484 -{{/expandable}}
508 + - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
509 + - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
485 485  
486 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
487 -- Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
488 -- Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
489 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
490 -{{/expandable}}
511 +---
491 491  
492 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
493 -1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
494 -2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
495 -3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
496 -{{/expandable}}
513 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
514 +- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
515 +- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
516 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
497 497  
498 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
499 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
500 -{{/expandable}}
501 -{{/expandable}}
518 +---
502 502  
503 -= IQ =
520 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
521 +1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
522 +2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
523 +3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
504 504  
505 -{{expandable summary="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
506 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
507 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
508 -**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
509 -**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
510 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
511 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
525 +---
512 512  
513 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
527 +## **Summary of Research Study**
528 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.
529 +
530 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
531 +
532 +---
533 +
534 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
535 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
536 +
537 +{{/expand}}
538 +
539 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
540 +
541 +{{expand title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media" expanded="false"}}
542 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
543 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
544 +**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
545 +**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
546 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
547 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
548 +
549 +---
550 +
551 +## **Key Statistics**
514 514  1. **General Observations:**
515 515   - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
516 516   - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
... ... @@ -522,9 +522,10 @@
522 522  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
523 523   - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
524 524   - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
525 -{{/expandable}}
526 526  
527 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
564 +---
565 +
566 +## **Findings**
528 528  1. **Primary Observations:**
529 529   - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
530 530   - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
... ... @@ -536,9 +536,10 @@
536 536  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
537 537   - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
538 538   - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
539 -{{/expandable}}
540 540  
541 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
579 +---
580 +
581 +## **Critique and Observations**
542 542  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
543 543   - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
544 544   - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
... ... @@ -550,657 +550,632 @@
550 550  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
551 551   - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
552 552   - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
553 -{{/expandable}}
554 554  
555 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
594 +---
595 +
596 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
556 556  - Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
557 557  - Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
558 558  - Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
559 -{{/expandable}}
560 560  
561 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
601 +---
602 +
603 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
562 562  1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
563 563  2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
564 564  3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
565 -{{/expandable}}
566 566  
567 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
608 +---
609 +
610 +## **Summary of Research Study**
611 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.
612 +
613 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
614 +
615 +---
616 +
617 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
568 568  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
569 -{{/expandable}}
570 -{{/expandable}}
571 571  
572 -{{expandable summary="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
573 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
574 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
575 -**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
576 -**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
577 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
578 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
620 +{{/expand}}
579 579  
580 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
622 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
623 +
624 +{{expand title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications" expanded="false"}}
625 +**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
626 +**Date of Publication:** *2010*
627 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
628 +**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
629 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
630 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
631 +
632 +---
633 +
634 +## **Key Statistics**
581 581  1. **General Observations:**
582 - - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
583 - - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
636 + - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
637 + - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
584 584  
585 585  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
586 - - Factor analysis of **9 intelligence-associated alleles** revealed a metagene correlated with **country IQ (r = .86)**.
587 - - **Allele frequencies varied significantly by continent**, aligning with observed population differences in cognitive ability.
640 + - Discusses **four primary definitions of race/subspecies**: Essentialist, Taxonomic, Population-based, and Lineage-based.
641 + - Suggests that **human heterozygosity levels are comparable to species that are classified as polytypic**.
588 588  
589 589  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
590 - - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
591 - - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
592 -{{/expandable}}
644 + - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
645 + - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
593 593  
594 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
647 +---
648 +
649 +## **Findings**
595 595  1. **Primary Observations:**
596 - - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
597 - - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
651 + - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
652 + - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
598 598  
599 599  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
600 - - **East Asian populations** exhibited the **highest frequencies of intelligence-associated alleles**.
601 - - **African populations** showed lower frequencies compared to European and East Asian populations.
655 + - Discusses **how race concepts evolved over time** in biological sciences.
656 + - Compares **human diversity with that of other primates** such as chimpanzees and gorillas.
602 602  
603 603  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
604 - - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
605 - - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
606 -{{/expandable}}
659 + - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
660 + - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
607 607  
608 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
662 +---
663 +
664 +## **Critique and Observations**
609 609  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
610 - - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
611 - - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
666 + - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
667 + - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
612 612  
613 613  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
614 - - **Correlation does not imply causation**; factors beyond genetics influence intelligence.
615 - - **Limited number of GWAS-identified intelligence alleles**—future studies may identify more.
670 + - Controversial topic with **strong opposing views in anthropology and genetics**.
671 + - **Relies on broad genetic trends**, but does not analyze individual-level genetic variation in depth.
616 616  
617 617  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
618 - - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
619 - - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
620 -{{/expandable}}
674 + - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
675 + - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
621 621  
622 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
623 -- Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
624 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
625 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
626 -{{/expandable}}
677 +---
627 627  
628 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
629 -1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
630 -2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
631 -3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
632 -{{/expandable}}
679 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
680 +- Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
681 +- Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
682 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
633 633  
634 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
635 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
636 -{{/expandable}}
637 -{{/expandable}}
684 +---
638 638  
639 -{{expandable summary="Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding"}}
640 -**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
641 -**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
642 -**Author(s):** Smith et al.
643 -**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
644 -**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
645 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
646 -{{/expandable}}
686 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
687 +1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
688 +2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
689 +3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
647 647  
648 -= Dating =
691 +---
649 649  
650 -{{expandable summary="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
651 -**Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
652 -**Date of Publication:** *2020*
653 -**Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
654 -**Title:** *"Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"*
655 -**DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
656 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
693 +## **Summary of Research Study**
694 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.
657 657  
658 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
696 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
697 +
698 +---
699 +
700 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
701 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
702 +
703 +{{/expand}}
704 +
705 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
706 +
707 +{{expand title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age" expanded="false"}}
708 +**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
709 +**Date of Publication:** *2013*
710 +**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
711 +**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
712 +**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
713 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
714 +
715 +---
716 +
717 +## **Key Statistics**
659 659  1. **General Observations:**
660 - - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
661 - - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
719 + - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
720 + - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
662 662  
663 663  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
664 - - Decreases in sexual activity were most prominent among **men aged 18-34**.
665 - - Factors like **marital status, employment, and psychological well-being** were associated with changes in sexual frequency.
723 + - Shared environmental influence on IQ **declines with age**, reaching **0.10 in adulthood**.
724 + - Monozygotic twins show **increasing genetic similarity in IQ over time**, while dizygotic twins become **less concordant**.
666 666  
667 667  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
668 - - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
669 - - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
670 -{{/expandable}}
727 + - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
728 + - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
671 671  
672 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
730 +---
731 +
732 +## **Findings**
673 673  1. **Primary Observations:**
674 - - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
675 - - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
734 + - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
735 + - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
676 676  
677 677  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
678 - - More pronounced decline among **unmarried individuals**.
679 - - No major change observed for **married adults** over time.
738 + - Studies from **Scotland, Netherlands, and the US** show **consistent patterns of increasing heritability with age**.
739 + - Findings hold across **varied socio-economic and educational backgrounds**.
680 680  
681 681  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
682 - - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
683 - - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
684 -{{/expandable}}
742 + - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
743 + - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
685 685  
686 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
745 +---
746 +
747 +## **Critique and Observations**
687 687  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
688 - - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
689 - - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
749 + - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
750 + - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
690 690  
691 691  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
692 - - Self-reported data may introduce **response bias**.
693 - - No direct causal mechanisms tested for the decline in sexual activity.
753 + - Findings apply primarily to **Western industrialized nations**, limiting generalizability.
754 + - **Lack of neurobiological mechanisms** explaining how genes express their influence over time.
694 694  
695 695  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
696 - - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
697 - - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
698 -{{/expandable}}
757 + - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
758 + - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
699 699  
700 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
701 -- Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
702 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
703 -{{/expandable}}
760 +---
704 704  
705 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
706 -1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
707 -2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
708 -{{/expandable}}
762 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
763 +- Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
764 +- Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
765 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
709 709  
710 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
711 -
712 -{{/expandable}}
713 -{{/expandable}}
767 +---
714 714  
715 -{{expandable summary="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
716 -**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
717 -**Date of Publication:** *2012*
718 -**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
719 -**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
720 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
721 -**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*
769 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
770 +1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
771 +2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
772 +3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
722 722  
723 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
724 -1. **General Observations:**
725 - - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
726 - - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
774 +---
727 727  
728 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
729 - - **Maternal race had a stronger influence than paternal race** on birth outcomes.
730 - - **Black mother–White father (BMWF) couples** had a higher risk than **White mother–Black father (WMBF) couples**.
776 +## **Summary of Research Study**
777 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.
731 731  
732 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
733 - - **Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for key outcomes:**
734 - - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
735 - - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
736 - - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
737 -{{/expandable}}
779 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
738 738  
739 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
740 -1. **Primary Observations:**
741 - - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
742 - - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
781 +---
743 743  
744 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
745 - - **Black mothers (regardless of paternal race) had the highest risk of LBW and PTB**.
746 - - **White mothers with Black fathers had a lower risk** than Black mothers with White fathers.
783 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
784 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
747 747  
748 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
749 - - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
750 - - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
751 -{{/expandable}}
786 +{{/expand}}
752 752  
753 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
754 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
755 - - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
756 - - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
788 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
757 757  
758 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
759 - - Data limited to **Black-White biracial couples**, excluding other racial groups.
760 - - **Socioeconomic and healthcare access factors** not fully explored.
790 +{{expand title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports" expanded="false"}}
791 +**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
792 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
793 +**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
794 +**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
795 +**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
796 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
761 761  
762 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
763 - - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
764 - - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
765 -{{/expandable}}
798 +---
766 766  
767 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
768 -- Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
769 -- Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
770 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.
771 -{{/expandable}}
772 -
773 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
774 -1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
775 -2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
776 -3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
777 -{{/expandable}}
778 -
779 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
780 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]
781 -{{/expandable}}
782 -{{/expandable}}
783 -
784 -{{expandable summary="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
785 -**Source:** *Current Psychology*
786 -**Date of Publication:** *2024*
787 -**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
788 -**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
789 -**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
790 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
791 -
792 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
800 +## **Key Statistics**
793 793  1. **General Observations:**
794 - - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
795 - - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
802 + - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
803 + - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
796 796  
797 797  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
798 - - Incels exhibited **higher levels of depression, anxiety, and self-critical rumination**.
799 - - **Social isolation was a key factor** differentiating incels from non-incels.
806 + - **Predominantly white sports programs** reinforce racial hierarchies in college athletics.
807 + - **Recruitment policies favor white athletes** from affluent, suburban backgrounds.
800 800  
801 801  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
802 - - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
803 - - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
804 -{{/expandable}}
810 + - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
811 + - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
805 805  
806 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
813 +---
814 +
815 +## **Findings**
807 807  1. **Primary Observations:**
808 - - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
809 - - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
817 + - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
818 + - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
810 810  
811 811  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
812 - - **Avoidant attachment styles** were a strong predictor of incel identity.
813 - - **Mate value perceptions** significantly differed between incels and non-incels.
821 + - **White athletes show limited awareness** of their racial advantage in sports.
822 + - **Black athletes are overrepresented** in revenue-generating sports but underrepresented in non-revenue teams.
814 814  
815 815  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
816 - - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
817 - - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
818 -{{/expandable}}
825 + - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
826 + - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
819 819  
820 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
828 +---
829 +
830 +## **Critique and Observations**
821 821  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
822 - - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
823 - - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
832 + - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
833 + - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
824 824  
825 825  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
826 - - Sample drawn from **Reddit communities**, which may not represent all incels.
827 - - **No causal conclusions**—correlations between isolation and inceldom need further research.
836 + - Focuses primarily on **Division I non-revenue sports**, limiting generalizability to other divisions.
837 + - Lacks extensive **quantitative data on racial demographics** in college athletics.
828 828  
829 829  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
830 - - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
831 - - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
832 -{{/expandable}}
840 + - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
841 + - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
833 833  
834 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
835 -- Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
836 -- Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
837 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
838 -{{/expandable}}
843 +---
839 839  
840 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
841 -1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
842 -2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
843 -3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
844 -{{/expandable}}
845 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
846 +- Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
847 +- Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
848 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
845 845  
846 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
847 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
848 -{{/expandable}}
849 -{{/expandable}}
850 +---
850 850  
851 -= Crime and Substance Abuse =
852 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
853 +1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
854 +2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
855 +3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
852 852  
853 -{{expandable summary="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
854 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
855 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
856 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
857 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
858 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
859 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
857 +---
860 860  
861 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
859 +## **Summary of Research Study**
860 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.
861 +
862 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
863 +
864 +---
865 +
866 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
867 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
868 +
869 +{{/expand}}
870 +
871 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
872 +
873 +{{expand title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History" expanded="false"}}
874 +**Source:** *Nature*
875 +**Date of Publication:** *2009*
876 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
877 +**Title:** *"Reconstructing Indian Population History"*
878 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
879 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*
880 +
881 +---
882 +
883 +## **Key Statistics**
862 862  1. **General Observations:**
863 - - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
864 - - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
885 + - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
886 + - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
865 865  
866 866  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
867 - - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
868 - - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
889 + - ANI ancestry is closely related to **Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans**.
890 + - ASI ancestry is **genetically distinct from ANI and East Asians**.
869 869  
870 870  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
871 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
872 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
873 -{{/expandable}}
893 + - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
894 + - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
874 874  
875 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
896 +---
897 +
898 +## **Findings**
876 876  1. **Primary Observations:**
877 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
878 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
900 + - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
901 + - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
879 879  
880 880  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
881 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
882 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
904 + - **Higher ANI ancestry in upper-caste and Indo-European-speaking groups**.
905 + - **Andaman Islanders** are unique in having **ASI ancestry without ANI influence**.
883 883  
884 884  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
885 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
886 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
887 -{{/expandable}}
908 + - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
909 + - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
888 888  
889 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
911 +---
912 +
913 +## **Critique and Observations**
890 890  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
891 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
892 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
915 + - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
916 + - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
893 893  
894 894  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
895 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
896 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
919 + - Limited **sample size relative to India's population diversity**.
920 + - Does not include **recent admixture events** post-colonial era.
897 897  
898 898  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
899 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
900 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
901 -{{/expandable}}
923 + - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
924 + - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
902 902  
903 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
904 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
905 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
906 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
907 -{{/expandable}}
926 +---
908 908  
909 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
910 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
911 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
912 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
913 -{{/expandable}}
928 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
929 +- Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
930 +- Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
931 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
914 914  
915 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
916 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
917 -{{/expandable}}
918 -{{/expandable}}
933 +---
919 919  
920 -{{expandable summary="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
921 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
922 -**Date of Publication:** *2003*
923 -**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
924 -**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
925 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
926 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
935 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
936 +1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
937 +2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
938 +3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
927 927  
928 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
929 -1. **General Observations:**
930 - - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
931 - - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
940 +---
932 932  
933 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
934 - - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
935 - - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
942 +## **Summary of Research Study**
943 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.
936 936  
937 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
938 - - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
939 - - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
940 -{{/expandable}}
945 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
941 941  
942 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
943 -1. **Primary Observations:**
944 - - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
945 - - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
947 +---
946 946  
947 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
948 - - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
949 - - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
949 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
950 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
950 950  
951 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
952 - - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
953 - - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
954 -{{/expandable}}
952 +{{/expand}}
955 955  
956 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
957 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
958 - - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
959 - - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
954 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
960 960  
961 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
962 - - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
963 - - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
964 964  
965 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
966 - - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
967 - - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
968 -{{/expandable}}
957 +{{expand title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations" expanded="false"}}
958 +**Source:** *Nature*
959 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
960 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
961 +**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
962 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
963 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
969 969  
970 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
971 -- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
972 -- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
973 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
974 -{{/expandable}}
965 +---
975 975  
976 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
977 -1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
978 -2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
979 -3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
980 -{{/expandable}}
981 -
982 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
983 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
984 -{{/expandable}}
985 -{{/expandable}}
986 -
987 -{{expandable summary="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
988 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
989 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
990 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
991 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
992 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
993 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
994 -
995 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
967 +## **Key Statistics**
996 996  1. **General Observations:**
997 - - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
998 - - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
969 + - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
970 + - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
999 999  
1000 1000  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1001 - - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1002 - - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
973 + - Found **higher genetic diversity within African populations** compared to non-African groups.
974 + - Showed **Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in non-African populations**, particularly in Oceania.
1003 1003  
1004 1004  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1005 - - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1006 - - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1007 -{{/expandable}}
977 + - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
978 + - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
1008 1008  
1009 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
980 +---
981 +
982 +## **Findings**
1010 1010  1. **Primary Observations:**
1011 - - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1012 - - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
984 + - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
985 + - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
1013 1013  
1014 1014  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1015 - - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1016 - - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
988 + - **Lower heterozygosity in non-Africans** due to founder effects from migration bottlenecks.
989 + - **Denisovan ancestry in South Asians is higher than previously thought**.
1017 1017  
1018 1018  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1019 - - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1020 - - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1021 -{{/expandable}}
992 + - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
993 + - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
1022 1022  
1023 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
995 +---
996 +
997 +## **Critique and Observations**
1024 1024  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1025 - - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1026 - - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
999 + - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
1000 + - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
1027 1027  
1028 1028  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1029 - - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1030 - - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1003 + - **Limited sample sizes for some populations**, restricting generalizability.
1004 + - Lacks ancient DNA comparisons, making it difficult to reconstruct deep ancestry fully.
1031 1031  
1032 1032  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1033 - - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1034 - - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1035 -{{/expandable}}
1007 + - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
1008 + - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
1036 1036  
1037 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1038 -- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1039 -- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1040 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1041 -{{/expandable}}
1010 +---
1042 1042  
1043 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1044 -1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1045 -2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1046 -3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1047 -{{/expandable}}
1012 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1013 +- Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
1014 +- Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
1015 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
1048 1048  
1049 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1050 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1051 -{{/expandable}}
1052 -{{/expandable}}
1017 +---
1053 1053  
1054 -{{expandable summary="
1019 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1020 +1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
1021 +2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
1022 +3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
1055 1055  
1056 -Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1057 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1058 -**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1059 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1060 -**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1061 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1062 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
1024 +---
1063 1063  
1064 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1026 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1027 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.
1028 +
1029 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1030 +
1031 +---
1032 +
1033 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1034 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
1035 +
1036 +{{/expand}}
1037 +
1038 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1039 +
1040 +{{expand title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies" expanded="false"}}
1041 +**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
1042 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1043 +**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
1044 +**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
1045 +**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
1046 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
1047 +
1048 +---
1049 +
1050 +## **Key Statistics**
1065 1065  1. **General Observations:**
1066 - - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1067 - - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
1052 + - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
1053 + - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
1068 1068  
1069 1069  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1070 - - The study found **slower reaction times in modern populations** compared to Victorian-era individuals.
1071 - - Data from **Western countries (US, UK, Canada, Australia, Finland)** were analyzed.
1056 + - Found **49% average heritability** across all traits.
1057 + - **69% of traits follow a simple additive genetic model**, meaning most variance is due to genes, not environment.
1072 1072  
1073 1073  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1074 - - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1075 - - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1076 -{{/expandable}}
1060 + - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
1061 + - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
1077 1077  
1078 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1063 +---
1064 +
1065 +## **Findings**
1079 1079  1. **Primary Observations:**
1080 - - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1081 - - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
1067 + - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
1068 + - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
1082 1082  
1083 1083  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1084 - - A stronger **correlation between slower reaction time and lower general intelligence (g)**.
1085 - - Flynn effect (IQ gains) does not contradict this finding, as reaction time is a **biological, not environmental, measure**.
1071 + - **Eye and brain-related traits showed the highest heritability (~70-80%)**.
1072 + - **Shared environmental effects were negligible (<10%) for most traits**.
1086 1086  
1087 1087  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1088 - - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1089 - - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1090 -{{/expandable}}
1075 + - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
1076 + - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
1091 1091  
1092 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1078 +---
1079 +
1080 +## **Critique and Observations**
1093 1093  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1094 - - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1095 - - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
1082 + - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
1083 + - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
1096 1096  
1097 1097  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1098 - - Some historical data sources **lack methodological consistency**.
1099 - - **Reaction time measurements vary by study**, requiring adjustments for equipment differences.
1086 + - **Underrepresentation of African, South American, and Asian twin cohorts**, limiting global generalizability.
1087 + - Cannot **fully separate genetic influences from potential cultural/environmental confounders**.
1100 1100  
1101 1101  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1102 - - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1103 - - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1104 -{{/expandable}}
1090 + - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
1091 + - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
1105 1105  
1106 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1107 -- Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1108 -- Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1109 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
1110 -{{/expandable}}
1093 +---
1111 1111  
1112 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1113 -1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1114 -2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1115 -3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1116 -{{/expandable}}
1095 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1096 +- Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
1097 +- Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
1098 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
1117 1117  
1118 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1119 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
1120 -{{/expandable}}
1121 -{{/expandable}}
1100 +---
1122 1122  
1123 -= Whiteness & White Guilt =
1102 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1103 +1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
1104 +2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
1105 +3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
1124 1124  
1125 -{{expandable summary="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1126 -**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1127 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1128 -**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1129 -**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1130 -**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1131 -**Subject Matter:** *Critical Race Theory, Sports Sociology, Anti-White Institutional Framing*
1107 +---
1132 1132  
1133 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1109 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1110 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.
1111 +
1112 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1113 +
1114 +---
1115 +
1116 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1117 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
1118 +
1119 +{{/expand}}
1120 +
1121 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1122 +
1123 +{{expand title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease" expanded="false"}}
1124 +**Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
1125 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1126 +**Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
1127 +**Title:** *"Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"*
1128 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
1129 +**Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*
1130 +
1131 +---
1132 +
1133 +## **Key Statistics**
1134 1134  1. **General Observations:**
1135 - - Based on **47 athlete interviews**, cherry-picked from non-revenue Division I sports.
1136 - - The study claims **“segregation”**, but presents no evidence of actual exclusion or policy bias just demographic imbalance.
1135 + - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
1136 + - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
1137 1137  
1138 1138  2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1139 - - Attributes **White participation** in certain sports to "systemic racism", ignoring **self-selection, geography, and cultural affinity**.
1140 - - Claims White athletes are protected from race discussions — but never engages with **Black overrepresentation in revenue sports**.
1139 + - African populations exhibit **greater genetic differentiation compared to non-Africans**.
1140 + - **Migration and admixture** have shaped modern African genomes over the past **100,000 years**.
1141 1141  
1142 1142  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1143 - - White athletes are portrayed as **ignorant of their privilege**, a claim drawn entirely from CRT frameworks rather than behavior or outcome.
1144 - - **No empirical data** is offered on policy, scholarship distribution, or team selection criteria.
1145 -{{/expandable}}
1143 + - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
1144 + - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
1146 1146  
1147 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1146 +---
1147 +
1148 +## **Findings**
1148 1148  1. **Primary Observations:**
1149 - - Frames **normal demographic patterns** (e.g., majority-White rosters in tennis or rowing) as "institutional whiteness".
1150 - - **Ignores the structural dominance** of Black athletes in high-profile revenue sports like football and basketball.
1150 + - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
1151 + - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
1151 1151  
1152 1152  2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1153 - - White athletes are criticized for **lacking racial awareness**, reinforcing the moral framing of **Whiteness as inherently problematic**.
1154 - - **Cultural preference, individual merit, and athletic subculture** are all excluded from consideration.
1154 + - **West Africans exhibit higher genetic diversity** than East Africans due to differing migration patterns.
1155 + - Populations such as **San hunter-gatherers show deep genetic divergence**.
1155 1155  
1156 1156  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1157 - - Argues that college sports **reinforce racial hierarchy** without ever showing how White athletes benefit more than Black athletes.
1158 - - Offers **no comparative analysis** of scholarships, graduation rates, or media portrayal by race.
1159 -{{/expandable}}
1158 + - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
1159 + - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
1160 1160  
1161 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1161 +---
1162 +
1163 +## **Critique and Observations**
1162 1162  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1163 - - Useful as a clear example of **how CRT ideologues weaponize demography** to frame White majority spaces as inherently suspect.
1164 - - Shows how **academic literature systematically avoids symmetrical analysis** when outcomes favor White participants.
1165 + - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
1166 + - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
1165 1165  
1166 1166  2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1167 - - **Excludes revenue sports**, where Black athletes dominate by numbers, prestige, and compensation.
1168 - - **Fails to explain** how team composition emerges from voluntary participation, geography, or subcultural identity.
1169 - - Treats **racial imbalance as proof of racism**, bypassing merit, interest, or socioeconomic context.
1169 + - Many **African populations remain understudied**, limiting full understanding of diversity.
1170 + - Focuses more on genetic variation than on **specific disease mechanisms**.
1170 1170  
1171 1171  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1172 - - Include **White athlete perspectives** without pre-framing them as racially naive or complicit.
1173 - - **Compare all sports**, including those where Black athletes thrive and lead.
1174 - - Remove CRT framing and **evaluate outcomes empirically**, not ideologically.
1175 -{{/expandable}}
1173 + - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
1174 + - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
1176 1176  
1177 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1178 -- Demonstrates how **DEI-aligned research reframes benign patterns** as oppressive when White majorities are involved.
1179 -- Illustrates **anti-White academic framing** in environments where no institutional barrier exists.
1180 -- Provides a concrete example of how **CRT avoids acknowledging Black dominance in elite spaces** (revenue athletics).
1181 -{{/expandable}}
1176 +---
1182 1182  
1183 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1184 -1. Investigate **racial self-sorting and cultural affiliation** in athletic participation.
1185 -2. Compare **media framing of White-majority vs. Black-majority sports**.
1186 -3. Study **how CRT narratives distort athletic merit and demographic outcomes**.
1187 -{{/expandable}}
1178 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1179 +- Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
1180 +- Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
1181 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
1188 1188  
1189 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1190 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
1191 -{{/expandable}}
1192 -{{/expandable}}
1183 +---
1193 1193  
1185 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1186 +1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
1187 +2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
1188 +3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
1194 1194  
1195 -{{expandable summary="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1196 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1197 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1198 -**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1190 +---
1191 +
1192 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1193 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.
1194 +
1195 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1196 +
1197 +---
1198 +
1199 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1200 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
1201 +
1202 +{{/expand}}
1203 +
1204 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1205 +
1206 +
1207 +
1208 +{{expand title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations" expanded="false"}}
1209 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1210 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1211 +**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1199 1199  **Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1200 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1201 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1213 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1214 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1202 1202  
1203 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1216 +---
1217 +
1218 +## **Key Statistics**
1204 1204  1. **General Observations:**
1205 1205   - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1206 1206   - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
... ... @@ -1212,9 +1212,10 @@
1212 1212  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1213 1213   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1214 1214   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1215 -{{/expandable}}
1216 1216  
1217 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1231 +---
1232 +
1233 +## **Findings**
1218 1218  1. **Primary Observations:**
1219 1219   - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1220 1220   - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
... ... @@ -1226,9 +1226,10 @@
1226 1226  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1227 1227   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1228 1228   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1229 -{{/expandable}}
1230 1230  
1231 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1246 +---
1247 +
1248 +## **Critique and Observations**
1232 1232  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1233 1233   - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1234 1234   - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
... ... @@ -1240,34 +1240,49 @@
1240 1240  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1241 1241   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1242 1242   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1243 -{{/expandable}}
1244 1244  
1245 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1261 +---
1262 +
1263 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1246 1246  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1247 1247  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1248 1248  - Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1249 -{{/expandable}}
1250 1250  
1251 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1268 +---
1269 +
1270 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1252 1252  1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1253 1253  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1254 1254  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1255 -{{/expandable}}
1256 1256  
1257 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1275 +---
1276 +
1277 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1278 +This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.
1279 +
1280 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1281 +
1282 +---
1283 +
1284 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1258 1258  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1259 -{{/expandable}}
1260 -{{/expandable}}
1261 1261  
1262 -{{expandable summary="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1263 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1264 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1265 -**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1266 -**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1267 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1268 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1287 +{{/expand}}
1269 1269  
1270 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1289 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1290 +
1291 +
1292 +{{expand title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans" expanded="false"}}
1293 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1294 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1295 +**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1296 +**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1297 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1298 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1299 +
1300 +---
1301 +
1302 +## **Key Statistics**
1271 1271  1. **General Observations:**
1272 1272   - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1273 1273   - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
... ... @@ -1279,9 +1279,10 @@
1279 1279  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1280 1280   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1281 1281   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1282 -{{/expandable}}
1283 1283  
1284 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1315 +---
1316 +
1317 +## **Findings**
1285 1285  1. **Primary Observations:**
1286 1286   - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1287 1287   - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
... ... @@ -1293,9 +1293,10 @@
1293 1293  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1294 1294   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1295 1295   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1296 -{{/expandable}}
1297 1297  
1298 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1330 +---
1331 +
1332 +## **Critique and Observations**
1299 1299  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1300 1300   - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1301 1301   - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
... ... @@ -1307,34 +1307,48 @@
1307 1307  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1308 1308   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1309 1309   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1310 -{{/expandable}}
1311 1311  
1312 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1345 +---
1346 +
1347 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1313 1313  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1314 1314  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1315 1315  - Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1316 -{{/expandable}}
1317 1317  
1318 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1352 +---
1353 +
1354 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1319 1319  1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1320 1320  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1321 1321  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1322 -{{/expandable}}
1323 1323  
1324 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1359 +---
1360 +
1361 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1362 +This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.
1363 +
1364 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1365 +
1366 +---
1367 +
1368 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1325 1325  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1326 -{{/expandable}}
1327 -{{/expandable}}
1328 1328  
1329 -{{expandable summary="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1330 -**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1331 -**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1332 -**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1333 -**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1334 -**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1335 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1371 +{{/expand}}
1336 1336  
1337 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1373 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1374 +
1375 +{{expand title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?" expanded="false"}}
1376 +**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1377 +**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1378 +**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1379 +**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1380 +**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1381 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1382 +
1383 +---
1384 +
1385 +## **Key Statistics**
1338 1338  1. **General Observations:**
1339 1339   - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1340 1340   - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
... ... @@ -1346,9 +1346,10 @@
1346 1346  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1347 1347   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1348 1348   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1349 -{{/expandable}}
1350 1350  
1351 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1398 +---
1399 +
1400 +## **Findings**
1352 1352  1. **Primary Observations:**
1353 1353   - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1354 1354   - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
... ... @@ -1360,9 +1360,10 @@
1360 1360  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1361 1361   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1362 1362   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1363 -{{/expandable}}
1364 1364  
1365 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1413 +---
1414 +
1415 +## **Critique and Observations**
1366 1366  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1367 1367   - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1368 1368   - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
... ... @@ -1374,37 +1374,382 @@
1374 1374  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1375 1375   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1376 1376   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1377 -{{/expandable}}
1378 1378  
1379 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1428 +---
1429 +
1430 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1380 1380  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1381 1381  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1382 1382  - Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1383 -{{/expandable}}
1384 1384  
1385 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1435 +---
1436 +
1437 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1386 1386  1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1387 1387  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1388 1388  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1389 -{{/expandable}}
1390 1390  
1391 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1442 +---
1443 +
1444 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1445 +This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.
1446 +
1447 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1448 +
1449 +---
1450 +
1451 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1392 1392  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1393 -{{/expandable}}
1394 -{{/expandable}}
1395 1395  
1396 -= Media =
1454 +{{/expand}}
1397 1397  
1398 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic"}}
1399 -**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1400 -**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1401 -**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1402 -**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1403 -**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1404 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*
1456 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1405 1405  
1406 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1458 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1459 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1460 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1461 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1462 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1463 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1464 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1465 +
1466 +---
1467 +
1468 +## **Key Statistics**
1407 1407  1. **General Observations:**
1470 + - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1471 + - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1472 +
1473 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1474 + - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1475 + - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1476 +
1477 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1478 + - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1479 + - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1480 +
1481 +---
1482 +
1483 +## **Findings**
1484 +1. **Primary Observations:**
1485 + - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1486 + - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1487 +
1488 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1489 + - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1490 + - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1491 +
1492 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1493 + - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1494 + - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1495 +
1496 +---
1497 +
1498 +## **Critique and Observations**
1499 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1500 + - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1501 + - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1502 +
1503 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1504 + - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1505 + - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1506 +
1507 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1508 + - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1509 + - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1510 +
1511 +---
1512 +
1513 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1514 +- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1515 +- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1516 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1517 +
1518 +---
1519 +
1520 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1521 +1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1522 +2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1523 +3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1524 +
1525 +---
1526 +
1527 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1528 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1529 +
1530 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1531 +
1532 +---
1533 +
1534 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1535 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1536 +
1537 +{{/expand}}
1538 +
1539 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1540 +
1541 +
1542 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1543 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1544 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1545 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1546 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1547 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1548 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1549 +
1550 +---
1551 +
1552 +## **Key Statistics**
1553 +1. **General Observations:**
1554 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1555 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1556 +
1557 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1558 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1559 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1560 +
1561 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1562 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1563 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1564 +
1565 +---
1566 +
1567 +## **Findings**
1568 +1. **Primary Observations:**
1569 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1570 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1571 +
1572 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1573 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1574 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1575 +
1576 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1577 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1578 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1579 +
1580 +---
1581 +
1582 +## **Critique and Observations**
1583 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1584 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1585 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1586 +
1587 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1588 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1589 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1590 +
1591 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1592 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1593 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1594 +
1595 +---
1596 +
1597 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1598 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1599 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1600 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1601 +
1602 +---
1603 +
1604 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1605 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1606 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1607 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1608 +
1609 +---
1610 +
1611 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1612 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1613 +
1614 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1615 +
1616 +---
1617 +
1618 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1619 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1620 +
1621 +{{/expand}}
1622 +
1623 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1624 +
1625 +{{expand title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys" expanded="false"}}
1626 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1627 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1628 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1629 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1630 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1631 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1632 +
1633 +---
1634 +
1635 +## **Key Statistics**
1636 +1. **General Observations:**
1637 + - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
1638 + - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
1639 +
1640 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1641 + - Black and Latino respondents **were more likely to underreport drug use** compared to White respondents.
1642 + - **Cultural stigma and distrust in research institutions** affected self-report accuracy.
1643 +
1644 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1645 + - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
1646 + - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
1647 +
1648 +---
1649 +
1650 +## **Findings**
1651 +1. **Primary Observations:**
1652 + - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
1653 + - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
1654 +
1655 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1656 + - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
1657 + - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
1658 +
1659 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1660 + - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
1661 + - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
1662 +
1663 +---
1664 +
1665 +## **Critique and Observations**
1666 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1667 + - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
1668 + - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
1669 +
1670 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1671 + - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
1672 + - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
1673 +
1674 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1675 + - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
1676 + - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
1677 +
1678 +---
1679 +
1680 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1681 +- Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
1682 +- Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
1683 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
1684 +
1685 +---
1686 +
1687 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1688 +1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
1689 +2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
1690 +3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
1691 +
1692 +---
1693 +
1694 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1695 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.
1696 +
1697 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1698 +
1699 +---
1700 +
1701 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1702 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
1703 +
1704 +{{/expand}}
1705 +
1706 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1707 +
1708 +{{expand title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program" expanded="false"}}
1709 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1710 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1711 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1712 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1713 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1714 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1715 +
1716 +---
1717 +
1718 +## **Key Statistics**
1719 +1. **General Observations:**
1720 + - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1721 + - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
1722 +
1723 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1724 + - Individuals with **stable jobs were more likely to complete the program**.
1725 + - **Black participants had lower success rates**, suggesting potential systemic disparities.
1726 +
1727 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1728 + - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1729 + - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1730 +
1731 +---
1732 +
1733 +## **Findings**
1734 +1. **Primary Observations:**
1735 + - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1736 + - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
1737 +
1738 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1739 + - White offenders had **higher completion rates** than Black offenders.
1740 + - Drug court success was **higher for those with lower initial drug use frequency**.
1741 +
1742 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1743 + - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1744 + - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1745 +
1746 +---
1747 +
1748 +## **Critique and Observations**
1749 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1750 + - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1751 + - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
1752 +
1753 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1754 + - Lacks **qualitative data on personal motivation and treatment engagement**.
1755 + - Focuses on **short-term program success** without tracking **long-term relapse rates**.
1756 +
1757 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1758 + - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1759 + - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1760 +
1761 +---
1762 +
1763 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1764 +- Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1765 +- Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1766 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1767 +
1768 +---
1769 +
1770 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1771 +1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1772 +2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1773 +3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1774 +
1775 +---
1776 +
1777 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1778 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.
1779 +
1780 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1781 +
1782 +---
1783 +
1784 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1785 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1786 +
1787 +{{/expand}}
1788 +
1789 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1790 +
1791 +{{expand title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict" expanded="false"}}
1792 +**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1793 +**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1794 +**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1795 +**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1796 +**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1797 +**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*
1798 +
1799 +---
1800 +
1801 +## **Key Statistics**
1802 +1. **General Observations:**
1408 1408   - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1409 1409   - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
1410 1410  
... ... @@ -1415,9 +1415,10 @@
1415 1415  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1416 1416   - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1417 1417   - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1418 -{{/expandable}}
1419 1419  
1420 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1814 +---
1815 +
1816 +## **Findings**
1421 1421  1. **Primary Observations:**
1422 1422   - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1423 1423   - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
... ... @@ -1429,9 +1429,10 @@
1429 1429  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1430 1430   - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1431 1431   - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1432 -{{/expandable}}
1433 1433  
1434 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1829 +---
1830 +
1831 +## **Critique and Observations**
1435 1435  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1436 1436   - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1437 1437   - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
... ... @@ -1443,101 +1443,47 @@
1443 1443  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1444 1444   - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1445 1445   - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1446 -{{/expandable}}
1447 1447  
1448 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1844 +---
1845 +
1846 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1449 1449  - Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
1450 1450  - Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1451 1451  - Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
1452 -{{/expandable}}
1453 1453  
1454 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1851 +---
1852 +
1853 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1455 1455  1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
1456 1456  2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1457 1457  3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1458 -{{/expandable}}
1459 1459  
1460 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1461 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
1462 -{{/expandable}}
1463 -{{/expandable}}
1858 +---
1464 1464  
1465 -{{expandable summary="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
1466 -**Source:** *Politics & Policy*
1467 -**Date of Publication:** *2007*
1468 -**Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
1469 -**Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
1470 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
1471 -**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*
1860 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1861 +This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.
1472 1472  
1473 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1474 -1. **General Observations:**
1475 - - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
1476 - - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
1863 +---
1477 1477  
1478 -2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1479 - - **Equality-based framing decreases opposition** to same-sex marriage.
1480 - - **Morality-based framing increases opposition** to same-sex marriage.
1865 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1866 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
1481 1481  
1482 -3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1483 - - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
1484 - - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
1485 -{{/expandable}}
1868 +{{/expand}}
1486 1486  
1487 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1488 -1. **Primary Observations:**
1489 - - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
1490 - - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
1870 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1491 1491  
1492 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1493 - - **Religious and conservative audiences** respond more to morality-based framing.
1494 - - **Younger and progressive audiences** respond more to equality-based framing.
1495 1495  
1496 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1497 - - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
1498 - - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
1499 -{{/expandable}}
1873 +{{expand title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion" expanded="false"}}
1874 +**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
1875 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1876 +**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
1877 +**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
1878 +**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
1879 +**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*
1500 1500  
1501 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1502 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1503 - - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
1504 - - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
1881 +---
1505 1505  
1506 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1507 - - Focuses **only on U.S. media coverage**, limiting global applicability.
1508 - - Does not account for **social media's growing influence** on public opinion.
1509 -
1510 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1511 - - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
1512 - - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
1513 -{{/expandable}}
1514 -
1515 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1516 -- Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
1517 -- Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
1518 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.
1519 -{{/expandable}}
1520 -
1521 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1522 -1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
1523 -2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
1524 -3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
1525 -{{/expandable}}
1526 -
1527 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1528 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]
1529 -{{/expandable}}
1530 -{{/expandable}}
1531 -
1532 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
1533 -**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
1534 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1535 -**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
1536 -**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
1537 -**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
1538 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*
1539 -
1540 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1883 +## **Key Statistics**
1541 1541  1. **General Observations:**
1542 1542   - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
1543 1543   - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
... ... @@ -1549,9 +1549,10 @@
1549 1549  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1550 1550   - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
1551 1551   - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
1552 -{{/expandable}}
1553 1553  
1554 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1896 +---
1897 +
1898 +## **Findings**
1555 1555  1. **Primary Observations:**
1556 1556   - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
1557 1557   - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
... ... @@ -1563,9 +1563,10 @@
1563 1563  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1564 1564   - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
1565 1565   - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
1566 -{{/expandable}}
1567 1567  
1568 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1911 +---
1912 +
1913 +## **Critique and Observations**
1569 1569  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1570 1570   - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
1571 1571   - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
... ... @@ -1577,127 +1577,278 @@
1577 1577  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1578 1578   - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
1579 1579   - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
1580 -{{/expandable}}
1581 1581  
1582 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1926 +---
1927 +
1928 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1583 1583  - Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
1584 1584  - Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
1585 1585  - Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
1586 -{{/expandable}}
1587 1587  
1588 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1933 +---
1934 +
1935 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
1589 1589  1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
1590 1590  2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
1591 1591  3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
1592 -{{/expandable}}
1593 1593  
1594 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1940 +---
1941 +
1942 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1943 +This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.
1944 +
1945 +---
1946 +
1947 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1595 1595  [[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
1596 -{{/expandable}}
1597 -{{/expandable}}
1598 1598  
1599 -{{expandable summary="Study: White Americans’ Preference for Black People in Advertising Has Increased in the Past 66 Years"}}
1600 -Source: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1601 -Date of Publication: February 20, 2024
1602 -Author(s): Julia Diana Lenk, Jochen Hartmann, Henrik Sattler
1603 -Title: "White Americans’ Preference for Black People in Advertising Has Increased in the Past 66 Years: A Meta-Analysis"
1604 -DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2307505121
1605 -Subject Matter: Advertising, Race, Consumer Behavior, Meta-Analysis
1950 +{{/expand}}
1606 1606  
1607 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1952 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1608 1608  
1609 -Study Scale:
1954 +{{expand title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA" expanded="false"}}
1955 +**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
1956 +**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
1957 +**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
1958 +**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
1959 +**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
1960 +**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*
1610 1610  
1611 -62 studies, 332 effect sizes, 10,186 participants (Black and White Americans).
1962 +---
1612 1612  
1613 -Covers the period 1956–2022.
1964 +## **Key Statistics**
1965 +1. **General Observations:**
1966 + - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
1967 + - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
1614 1614  
1615 -Cohen’s d Effect Sizes (Model-Free):
1969 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
1970 + - Examines **West Eurasian populations** and their genetic evolution.
1971 + - Tracks **changes in allele frequencies over millennia**.
1616 1616  
1617 -Black viewers: d = 0.50 → strong, consistent ingroup preference for Black models.
1973 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1974 + - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
1975 + - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
1618 1618  
1619 -White viewers: d = –0.08 overall; pre-2000: d = –0.16 (ingroup); post-2000: d = +0.02 (outgroup leaning).
1977 +---
1620 1620  
1621 -Regression Findings:
1979 +## **Findings**
1980 +1. **Primary Observations:**
1981 + - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
1982 + - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
1622 1622  
1623 -White viewers’ preference for Black models increases by ~0.0128 d/year since 1956 (p < 0.05).
1984 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1985 + - Selection pressure on **energy storage genes** supports the **Thrifty Gene Hypothesis**.
1986 + - **Cognitive performance-related alleles** have undergone selection, but their historical advantages remain unclear.
1624 1624  
1625 -By 2022, White viewers showed positive directional preference for Black endorsers.
1988 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1989 + - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
1990 + - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
1991 + - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
1626 1626  
1627 -Black viewer preferences remained stable across the 66 years.
1628 -{{/expandable}}
1993 +---
1629 1629  
1630 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1995 +## **Critique and Observations**
1996 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1997 + - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
1998 + - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
1631 1631  
1632 -Primary Observations:
2000 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
2001 + - Findings **may not translate directly** to modern populations.
2002 + - **Unclear whether observed selection pressures persist today**.
1633 1633  
1634 -Ingroup favoritism is evident: Black viewers consistently prefer Black endorsers.
2004 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
2005 + - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
2006 + - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
1635 1635  
1636 -White viewers’ preferences have shifted significantly over time toward favoring Black endorsers.
2008 +---
1637 1637  
1638 -Temporal Trends:
2010 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
2011 +- Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
2012 +- Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
2013 +- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.
1639 1639  
1640 -Turning point: Around 2002–2003, White viewers began showing a positive (though small) preference for Black endorsers.
2015 +---
1641 1641  
1642 -Moderator Effects:
2017 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2018 +1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
2019 +2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
2020 +3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
1643 1643  
1644 -Low anti-Black prejudice and low White ethnic identification correlate with greater White preference for Black endorsers.
2022 +---
1645 1645  
1646 -Economic hardship (e.g., high unemployment) slightly reduces White preference for Black endorsers.
2024 +## **Summary of Research Study**
2025 +This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.
1647 1647  
1648 -Identification Model:
2027 +---
1649 1649  
1650 -Preference changes are stronger when outcomes measure identification with endorsers (e.g., similarity, attractiveness).
1651 -{{/expandable}}
2029 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
2030 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]
1652 1652  
1653 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
2032 +{{/expand}}
1654 1654  
1655 -Strengths of the Study:
2034 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
1656 1656  
1657 -Longest-running meta-analysis on interracial preferences in advertising.
2036 +{{expand title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" expanded="false"}}
2037 +**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
2038 +**Date of Publication:** *2012*
2039 +**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
2040 +**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
2041 +**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
2042 +**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*
1658 1658  
1659 -Includes multilevel modeling and 21 meta-analytic covariates.
2044 +---
1660 1660  
1661 -Accounts for both perceiver and societal context, and controls for publication bias.
2046 +## **Key Statistics**
2047 +1. **General Observations:**
2048 + - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
2049 + - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
1662 1662  
1663 -Limitations:
2051 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
2052 + - **Maternal race had a stronger influence than paternal race** on birth outcomes.
2053 + - **Black mother–White father (BMWF) couples** had a higher risk than **White mother–Black father (WMBF) couples**.
1664 1664  
1665 -Only examines Black and White racial dynamics—doesn’t cover Hispanic, Asian, or multiracial groups.
2055 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
2056 + - **Adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) for key outcomes:**
2057 + - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
2058 + - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
2059 + - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
1666 1666  
1667 -72% of effect sizes are from student samples (not fully generalizable).
2061 +---
1668 1668  
1669 -Social desirability bias may affect lab-based responses.
2063 +## **Findings**
2064 +1. **Primary Observations:**
2065 + - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
2066 + - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
1670 1670  
1671 -Suggestions for Improvement:
2068 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
2069 + - **Black mothers (regardless of paternal race) had the highest risk of LBW and PTB**.
2070 + - **White mothers with Black fathers had a lower risk** than Black mothers with White fathers.
1672 1672  
1673 -Include field experiments and more representative samples (age, class, ideology).
2072 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
2073 + - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
2074 + - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
1674 1674  
1675 -Examine how Black models are portrayed, not just if they are shown.
2076 +---
1676 1676  
1677 -Extend research to other racial groups and multiracial representations.
1678 -{{/expandable}}
2078 +## **Critique and Observations**
2079 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2080 + - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
2081 + - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
1679 1679  
1680 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
2083 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
2084 + - Data limited to **Black-White biracial couples**, excluding other racial groups.
2085 + - **Socioeconomic and healthcare access factors** not fully explored.
1681 1681  
1682 -Provides empirical support for the dynamic shift in White American attitudes over time.
2087 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
2088 + - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
2089 + - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
1683 1683  
1684 -Directly informs discussions about media representation, consumer behavior, and racial identity.
2091 +---
1685 1685  
1686 -Supports policy and commercial arguments for including more diverse models in advertising.
1687 -{{/expandable}}
2093 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
2094 +- Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
2095 +- Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
2096 +- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.
1688 1688  
1689 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
2098 +---
1690 1690  
1691 -Expand analysis to Latino, Asian, and multiracial models in media.
2100 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2101 +1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
2102 +2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
2103 +3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
1692 1692  
1693 -Study real-world (non-lab) consumer reactions to racial diversity in advertising.
2105 +---
1694 1694  
1695 -Investigate how economic anxiety influences racial preferences in other domains (e.g., hiring, education).
2107 +## **Summary of Research Study**
2108 +This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.
1696 1696  
1697 -Explore how virtual influencers or AI-generated models affect racial perceptions.
1698 -{{/expandable}}
2110 +---
1699 1699  
1700 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1701 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:lenk-et-al-white-americans-preference-for-black-people-in-advertising-has-increased-in-the-past-66-years-a-meta-analysis.pdf]]
1702 -{{/expandable}}
1703 -{{/expandable}}
2112 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
2113 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]
2114 +
2115 +{{/expand}}
2116 +
2117 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
2118 +
2119 +{{expand title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions" expanded="false"}}
2120 +**Source:** *Politics & Policy*
2121 +**Date of Publication:** *2007*
2122 +**Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
2123 +**Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
2124 +**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
2125 +**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*
2126 +
2127 +---
2128 +
2129 +## **Key Statistics**
2130 +1. **General Observations:**
2131 + - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
2132 + - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
2133 +
2134 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
2135 + - **Equality-based framing decreases opposition** to same-sex marriage.
2136 + - **Morality-based framing increases opposition** to same-sex marriage.
2137 +
2138 +3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
2139 + - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
2140 + - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
2141 +
2142 +---
2143 +
2144 +## **Findings**
2145 +1. **Primary Observations:**
2146 + - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
2147 + - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
2148 +
2149 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
2150 + - **Religious and conservative audiences** respond more to morality-based framing.
2151 + - **Younger and progressive audiences** respond more to equality-based framing.
2152 +
2153 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
2154 + - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
2155 + - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
2156 +
2157 +---
2158 +
2159 +## **Critique and Observations**
2160 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
2161 + - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
2162 + - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
2163 +
2164 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
2165 + - Focuses **only on U.S. media coverage**, limiting global applicability.
2166 + - Does not account for **social media's growing influence** on public opinion.
2167 +
2168 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
2169 + - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
2170 + - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
2171 +
2172 +---
2173 +
2174 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
2175 +- Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
2176 +- Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
2177 +- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.
2178 +
2179 +---
2180 +
2181 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
2182 +1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
2183 +2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
2184 +3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
2185 +
2186 +---
2187 +
2188 +## **Summary of Research Study**
2189 +This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.
2190 +
2191 +---
2192 +
2193 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
2194 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]
2195 +
2196 +{{/expand}}
2197 +
2198 +{{html}}<hr style="border: 3px solid red;">{{/html}}
2199 +
Cultural Voyeurism A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Intera.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -103.1 KB
Content
lenk-et-al-white-americans-preference-for-black-people-in-advertising-has-increased-in-the-past-66-years-a-meta-analysis.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2.1 MB
Content