0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 110.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/06/19 02:53
Change comment: Uploaded new attachment "lenk-et-al-white-americans-preference-for-black-people-in-advertising-has-increased-in-the-past-66-years-a-meta-analysis.pdf", version 1.1
To version 88.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/03/30 12:03
Change comment: Uploaded new attachment "Cultural Voyeurism A New Framework for Understanding Race, Ethnicity, and Mediated Intergroup Intera.pdf", version 1.1

Summary

Details

Page properties
Parent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -Main Categories.Science & Research.WebHome
1 +Main.Studies.WebHome
Content
... ... @@ -1,17 +4,99 @@
1 -{{toc/}}
2 -
3 -
4 4  = Research at a Glance =
5 5  
6 6  
7 7  
8 - Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various important Racial themes. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout. I wanted to make this for a couple of reasons. Number one is organization. There are a ton of useful studies out there that expose the truth, sometimes inadvertently. You'll notice that in this initial draft the summaries are often woke and reflect the bias of the AI writing them as well as the researchers politically correct conclusion in most cases. That's because I haven't gotten to going through and pointing out the reasons I put all of them in here.
5 + Welcome to the **Research at a Glance** repository. This section serves as a **centralized reference hub** for key academic studies related to various important Racial themes. Each study is categorized for easy navigation and presented in a **collapsible format** to maintain a clean layout. I wanted to make this for a couple of reasons. Number one is organization. There are a ton of useful studies out there that expose the truth, sometimes inadvertently. You'll notice that in this initial draft the summaries are often woke and reflect the bias of the AI writing them as well as the researchers politically correct conclusions in most cases. That's because I haven't gotten to going through and pointing out the reasons I put all of them in here.
9 9  
10 10  
11 11   There is often an underlying hypocrisy or double standard, saying the quiet part out loud, or conclusions that are so much of an antithesis to what the data shows that made me want to include it. At least, thats the idea for once its polished. I have about 150 more studies to upload, so it will be a few weeks before I get through it all. Until such time, feel free to search for them yourself and edit in what you find, or add your own studies. If you like you can do it manually, or if you'd rather go the route I did, just rename the study to its doi number and feed the study into an AI and tell them to summarize the study using the following format:
12 12  
10 +{{example}}
11 +~= Study: [Study Title] =
13 13  
13 +~{~{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
14 +~*~*Source:~*~* *[Journal/Institution Name]*
15 +~*~*Date of Publication:~*~* *[Publication Date]*
16 +~*~*Author(s):~*~* *[Author(s) Name(s)]*
17 +~*~*Title:~*~* *"[Study Title]"*
18 +~*~*DOI:~*~* [DOI or Link]
19 +~*~*Subject Matter:~*~* *[Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]*ย 
14 14  
21 +~-~--
22 +
23 +~#~# ~*~*Key Statistics~*~*
24 +~1. ~*~*General Observations:~*~*
25 + - [Statistical finding or observation]
26 + - [Statistical finding or observation]
27 +
28 +2. ~*~*Subgroup Analysis:~*~*
29 + - [Breakdown of findings by gender, race, or other subgroups]
30 +
31 +3. ~*~*Other Significant Data Points:~*~*
32 + - [Any additional findings or significant statistics]
33 +
34 +~-~--
35 +
36 +~#~# ~*~*Findings~*~*
37 +~1. ~*~*Primary Observations:~*~*
38 + - [High-level findings or trends in the study]
39 +
40 +2. ~*~*Subgroup Trends:~*~*
41 + - [Disparities or differences highlighted in the study]
42 +
43 +3. ~*~*Specific Case Analysis:~*~*
44 + - [Detailed explanation of any notable specific findings]
45 +
46 +~-~--
47 +
48 +~#~# ~*~*Critique and Observations~*~*
49 +~1. ~*~*Strengths of the Study:~*~*
50 + - [Examples: strong methodology, large dataset, etc.]
51 +
52 +2. ~*~*Limitations of the Study:~*~*
53 + - [Examples: data gaps, lack of upstream analysis, etc.]
54 +
55 +3. ~*~*Suggestions for Improvement:~*~*
56 + - [Ideas for further research or addressing limitations]
57 +
58 +~-~--
59 +
60 +~#~# ~*~*Relevance to Subproject~*~*
61 +- [Explanation of how this study contributes to your subproject goals.]
62 +- [Any key arguments or findings that support or challenge your views.]
63 +
64 +~-~--
65 +
66 +~#~# ~*~*Suggestions for Further Exploration~*~*
67 +~1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
68 +2. [Potential studies or sources to complement this analysis.]
69 +
70 +~-~--
71 +
72 +~#~# ~*~*Summary of Research Study~*~*
73 +This study examines ~*~*[core research question or focus]~*~*, providing insights into ~*~*[main subject area]~*~*. The research utilized ~*~*[sample size and methodology]~*~* to assess ~*~*[key variables or measured outcomes]~*~*.ย 
74 +
75 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
76 +
77 +~-~--
78 +
79 +~#~# ~*~*๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study~*~*
80 +~{~{velocity}}
81 +#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
82 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
83 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach~:$filename"))
84 +~[~[Download Full Study>>attach~:$filename]]
85 +#else
86 +~{~{html}}<span style="color:red; font-weight:bold;">๐Ÿšจ PDF Not Available ๐Ÿšจ</span>~{~{/html}}
87 +#end
88 +~{~{/velocity}}
89 +
90 +~{~{/expand}}
91 +
92 +
93 +{{/example}}
94 +
95 +
96 +
15 15  - Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
16 16  - Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
17 17  - Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
... ... @@ -19,12 +19,18 @@
19 19  - You'll also find a download link to the original full study in pdf form at the bottom of the collapsible block.
20 20  
21 21  
104 +{{toc/}}
22 22  
106 +
107 +
108 +
109 +
23 23  = Genetics =
24 24  
25 -{{expandable summary="
26 26  
27 -Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
113 +== Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History ==
114 +
115 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
28 28  **Source:** *Nature*
29 29  **Date of Publication:** *2009*
30 30  **Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
... ... @@ -32,7 +32,10 @@
32 32  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
33 33  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry*ย 
34 34  
35 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
123 +----
124 +
125 +## **Key Statistics**##
126 +
36 36  1. **General Observations:**
37 37   - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
38 38   - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
... ... @@ -44,9 +44,11 @@
44 44  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
45 45   - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
46 46   - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
47 -{{/expandable}}
48 48  
49 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
139 +----
140 +
141 +## **Findings**##
142 +
50 50  1. **Primary Observations:**
51 51   - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
52 52   - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
... ... @@ -58,9 +58,11 @@
58 58  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
59 59   - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
60 60   - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
61 -{{/expandable}}
62 62  
63 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
155 +----
156 +
157 +## **Critique and Observations**##
158 +
64 64  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
65 65   - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
66 66   - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
... ... @@ -72,34 +72,50 @@
72 72  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
73 73   - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
74 74   - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
75 -{{/expandable}}
76 76  
77 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
171 +----
172 +
173 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
78 78  - Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
79 79  - Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
80 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
81 -{{/expandable}}
176 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
82 82  
83 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
178 +----
179 +
180 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
181 +
84 84  1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
85 85  2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
86 86  3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
87 -{{/expandable}}
88 88  
89 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
90 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
91 -{{/expandable}}
92 -{{/expandable}}
186 +----
93 93  
94 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
95 -**Source:** *Nature*
96 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
97 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
98 -**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
99 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
100 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
188 +## **Summary of Research Study**
189 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populationsโ€”**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
101 101  
102 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
191 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
192 +
193 +----
194 +
195 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
196 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
197 +{{/expand}}
198 +
199 +
200 +== Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations ==
201 +
202 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
203 +**Source:** *Nature*
204 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
205 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
206 +**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
207 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
208 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*ย 
209 +
210 +----
211 +
212 +## **Key Statistics**##
213 +
103 103  1. **General Observations:**
104 104   - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
105 105   - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
... ... @@ -111,9 +111,11 @@
111 111  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
112 112   - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
113 113   - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
114 -{{/expandable}}
115 115  
116 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
226 +----
227 +
228 +## **Findings**##
229 +
117 117  1. **Primary Observations:**
118 118   - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
119 119   - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
... ... @@ -125,9 +125,11 @@
125 125  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
126 126   - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
127 127   - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
128 -{{/expandable}}
129 129  
130 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
242 +----
243 +
244 +## **Critique and Observations**##
245 +
131 131  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
132 132   - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
133 133   - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
... ... @@ -139,36 +139,50 @@
139 139  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
140 140   - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
141 141   - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
142 -{{/expandable}}
143 143  
144 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
258 +----
259 +
260 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
145 145  - Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
146 146  - Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
147 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
148 -{{/expandable}}
263 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
149 149  
150 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
265 +----
266 +
267 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
268 +
151 151  1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
152 152  2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
153 153  3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
154 -{{/expandable}}
155 155  
156 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
157 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
158 -{{/expandable}}
159 -{{/expandable}}
273 +----
160 160  
161 -{{expandable summary="
275 +## **Summary of Research Study**
276 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
162 162  
163 -Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
164 -**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
165 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
166 -**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
167 -**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
168 -**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
169 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
278 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
170 170  
171 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
280 +----
281 +
282 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
283 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
284 +{{/expand}}
285 +
286 +
287 +== Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies ==
288 +
289 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
290 +**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
291 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
292 +**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
293 +**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
294 +**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
295 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*ย 
296 +
297 +----
298 +
299 +## **Key Statistics**##
300 +
172 172  1. **General Observations:**
173 173   - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
174 174   - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
... ... @@ -180,9 +180,11 @@
180 180  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
181 181   - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
182 182   - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
183 -{{/expandable}}
184 184  
185 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
313 +----
314 +
315 +## **Findings**##
316 +
186 186  1. **Primary Observations:**
187 187   - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
188 188   - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
... ... @@ -194,9 +194,11 @@
194 194  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
195 195   - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
196 196   - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
197 -{{/expandable}}
198 198  
199 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
329 +----
330 +
331 +## **Critique and Observations**##
332 +
200 200  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
201 201   - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
202 202   - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
... ... @@ -208,28 +208,39 @@
208 208  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
209 209   - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
210 210   - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
211 -{{/expandable}}
212 212  
213 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
345 +----
346 +
347 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
214 214  - Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
215 215  - Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
216 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
217 -{{/expandable}}
350 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
218 218  
219 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
352 +----
353 +
354 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
355 +
220 220  1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
221 221  2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
222 222  3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
223 -{{/expandable}}
224 224  
225 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
226 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
227 -{{/expandable}}
228 -{{/expandable}}
360 +----
229 229  
230 -{{expandable summary="
362 +## **Summary of Research Study**
363 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
231 231  
232 -Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
365 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
366 +
367 +----
368 +
369 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
370 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
371 +{{/expand}}
372 +
373 +
374 +== Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease ==
375 +
376 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
233 233  **Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
234 234  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
235 235  **Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
... ... @@ -237,7 +237,10 @@
237 237  **DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
238 238  **Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases*ย 
239 239  
240 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
384 +----
385 +
386 +## **Key Statistics**##
387 +
241 241  1. **General Observations:**
242 242   - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
243 243   - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
... ... @@ -249,9 +249,11 @@
249 249  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
250 250   - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
251 251   - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
252 -{{/expandable}}
253 253  
254 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
400 +----
401 +
402 +## **Findings**##
403 +
255 255  1. **Primary Observations:**
256 256   - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
257 257   - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
... ... @@ -263,9 +263,11 @@
263 263  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
264 264   - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
265 265   - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
266 -{{/expandable}}
267 267  
268 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
416 +----
417 +
418 +## **Critique and Observations**##
419 +
269 269  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
270 270   - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
271 271   - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
... ... @@ -277,36 +277,50 @@
277 277  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
278 278   - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
279 279   - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
280 -{{/expandable}}
281 281  
282 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
432 +----
433 +
434 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
283 283  - Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
284 284  - Reinforces **Africaโ€™s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
285 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
286 -{{/expandable}}
437 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
287 287  
288 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
439 +----
440 +
441 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
442 +
289 289  1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
290 290  2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
291 291  3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
292 -{{/expandable}}
293 293  
294 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
295 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
296 -{{/expandable}}
297 -{{/expandable}}
447 +----
298 298  
299 -{{expandable summary="
449 +## **Summary of Research Study**
450 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africaโ€™s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
300 300  
301 -Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
302 -**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
303 -**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
304 -**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
305 -**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
306 -**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
307 -**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*
452 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
308 308  
309 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
454 +----
455 +
456 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
457 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
458 +{{/expand}}
459 +
460 +
461 +== Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA ==
462 +
463 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
464 +**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
465 +**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
466 +**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
467 +**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
468 +**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
469 +**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*ย 
470 +
471 +----
472 +
473 +## **Key Statistics**##
474 +
310 310  1. **General Observations:**
311 311   - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
312 312   - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
... ... @@ -318,9 +318,11 @@
318 318  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
319 319   - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
320 320   - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
321 -{{/expandable}}
322 322  
323 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
487 +----
488 +
489 +## **Findings**##
490 +
324 324  1. **Primary Observations:**
325 325   - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
326 326   - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
... ... @@ -333,9 +333,11 @@
333 333   - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
334 334   - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
335 335   - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
336 -{{/expandable}}
337 337  
338 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
504 +----
505 +
506 +## **Critique and Observations**##
507 +
339 339  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
340 340   - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
341 341   - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
... ... @@ -347,34 +347,48 @@
347 347  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
348 348   - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
349 349   - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
350 -{{/expandable}}
351 351  
352 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
520 +----
521 +
522 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
353 353  - Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
354 354  - Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
355 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.
356 -{{/expandable}}
525 +- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
357 357  
358 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
527 +----
528 +
529 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
530 +
359 359  1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
360 360  2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
361 361  3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
362 -{{/expandable}}
363 363  
364 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
365 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]
366 -{{/expandable}}
367 -{{/expandable}}
535 +----
368 368  
369 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
370 -**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
371 -**Date of Publication:** *2013*
372 -**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
373 -**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
374 -**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
375 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
537 +## **Summary of Research Study**
538 +This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
376 376  
377 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
540 +----
541 +
542 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
543 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
544 +{{/expand}}
545 +
546 +
547 +== Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age ==
548 +
549 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
550 +**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
551 +**Date of Publication:** *2013*
552 +**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
553 +**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
554 +**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
555 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*ย 
556 +
557 +----
558 +
559 +## **Key Statistics**##
560 +
378 378  1. **General Observations:**
379 379   - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
380 380   - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
... ... @@ -386,9 +386,11 @@
386 386  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
387 387   - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
388 388   - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
389 -{{/expandable}}
390 390  
391 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
573 +----
574 +
575 +## **Findings**##
576 +
392 392  1. **Primary Observations:**
393 393   - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
394 394   - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
... ... @@ -400,9 +400,11 @@
400 400  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
401 401   - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
402 402   - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
403 -{{/expandable}}
404 404  
405 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
589 +----
590 +
591 +## **Critique and Observations**##
592 +
406 406  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
407 407   - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
408 408   - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
... ... @@ -414,34 +414,50 @@
414 414  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
415 415   - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
416 416   - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
417 -{{/expandable}}
418 418  
419 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
605 +----
606 +
607 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
420 420  - Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
421 421  - Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
422 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
423 -{{/expandable}}
610 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
424 424  
425 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
612 +----
613 +
614 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
615 +
426 426  1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
427 427  2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
428 428  3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
429 -{{/expandable}}
430 430  
431 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
432 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
433 -{{/expandable}}
434 -{{/expandable}}
620 +----
435 435  
436 -{{expandable summary="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
437 -**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
438 -**Date of Publication:** *2010*
439 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
440 -**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
441 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
442 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
622 +## **Summary of Research Study**
623 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
443 443  
444 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
625 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
626 +
627 +----
628 +
629 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
630 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
631 +{{/expand}}
632 +
633 +
634 +== Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications ==
635 +
636 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
637 +**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
638 +**Date of Publication:** *2010*
639 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
640 +**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
641 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
642 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*ย 
643 +
644 +----
645 +
646 +## **Key Statistics**##
647 +
445 445  1. **General Observations:**
446 446   - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
447 447   - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
... ... @@ -453,9 +453,11 @@
453 453  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
454 454   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
455 455   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
456 -{{/expandable}}
457 457  
458 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
660 +----
661 +
662 +## **Findings**##
663 +
459 459  1. **Primary Observations:**
460 460   - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
461 461   - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
... ... @@ -467,9 +467,11 @@
467 467  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
468 468   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
469 469   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
470 -{{/expandable}}
471 471  
472 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
676 +----
677 +
678 +## **Critique and Observations**##
679 +
473 473  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
474 474   - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
475 475   - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
... ... @@ -481,36 +481,50 @@
481 481  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
482 482   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
483 483   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
484 -{{/expandable}}
485 485  
486 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
692 +----
693 +
694 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
487 487  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
488 488  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
489 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
490 -{{/expandable}}
697 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
491 491  
492 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
699 +----
700 +
701 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
702 +
493 493  1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
494 494  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
495 495  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
496 -{{/expandable}}
497 497  
498 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
499 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
500 -{{/expandable}}
501 -{{/expandable}}
707 +----
502 502  
503 -= IQ =
709 +## **Summary of Research Study**
710 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
504 504  
505 -{{expandable summary="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
506 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
507 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
508 -**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
509 -**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
510 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
511 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
712 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
512 512  
513 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
714 +----
715 +
716 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
717 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
718 +{{/expand}}
719 +
720 +
721 +== Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media ==
722 +
723 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
724 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
725 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
726 +**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
727 +**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
728 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
729 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*ย 
730 +
731 +----
732 +
733 +## **Key Statistics**##
734 +
514 514  1. **General Observations:**
515 515   - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
516 516   - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
... ... @@ -522,9 +522,11 @@
522 522  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
523 523   - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
524 524   - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
525 -{{/expandable}}
526 526  
527 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
747 +----
748 +
749 +## **Findings**##
750 +
528 528  1. **Primary Observations:**
529 529   - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
530 530   - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
... ... @@ -536,9 +536,11 @@
536 536  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
537 537   - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
538 538   - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
539 -{{/expandable}}
540 540  
541 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
763 +----
764 +
765 +## **Critique and Observations**##
766 +
542 542  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
543 543   - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
544 544   - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
... ... @@ -550,34 +550,50 @@
550 550  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
551 551   - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
552 552   - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
553 -{{/expandable}}
554 554  
555 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
779 +----
780 +
781 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
556 556  - Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
557 557  - Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
558 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
559 -{{/expandable}}
784 +- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
560 560  
561 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
786 +----
787 +
788 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
789 +
562 562  1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
563 563  2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
564 564  3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
565 -{{/expandable}}
566 566  
567 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
568 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
569 -{{/expandable}}
570 -{{/expandable}}
794 +----
571 571  
572 -{{expandable summary="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
573 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
574 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
575 -**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
576 -**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
577 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
578 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
796 +## **Summary of Research Study**
797 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
579 579  
580 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
799 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
800 +
801 +----
802 +
803 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
804 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
805 +{{/expand}}
806 +
807 +
808 +== Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation ==
809 +
810 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
811 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
812 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
813 +**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
814 +**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
815 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
816 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*ย 
817 +
818 +----
819 +
820 +## **Key Statistics**##
821 +
581 581  1. **General Observations:**
582 582   - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
583 583   - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
... ... @@ -589,9 +589,11 @@
589 589  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
590 590   - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
591 591   - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
592 -{{/expandable}}
593 593  
594 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
834 +----
835 +
836 +## **Findings**##
837 +
595 595  1. **Primary Observations:**
596 596   - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
597 597   - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
... ... @@ -603,9 +603,11 @@
603 603  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
604 604   - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
605 605   - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
606 -{{/expandable}}
607 607  
608 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
850 +----
851 +
852 +## **Critique and Observations**##
853 +
609 609  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
610 610   - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
611 611   - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
... ... @@ -617,37 +617,78 @@
617 617  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
618 618   - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
619 619   - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
620 -{{/expandable}}
621 621  
622 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
866 +----
867 +
868 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
623 623  - Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
624 624  - Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
625 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
626 -{{/expandable}}
871 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
627 627  
628 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
873 +----
874 +
875 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
876 +
629 629  1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
630 630  2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
631 631  3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
632 -{{/expandable}}
633 633  
634 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
635 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
636 -{{/expandable}}
637 -{{/expandable}}
881 +----
638 638  
639 -{{expandable summary="Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding"}}
640 -**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
641 -**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
642 -**Author(s):** Smith et al.
643 -**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
644 -**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
645 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
646 -{{/expandable}}
883 +## **Summary of Research Study**
884 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.ย  ##
647 647  
648 -= Dating =
886 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
649 649  
650 -{{expandable summary="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
888 +----
889 +
890 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
891 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
892 +{{/expand}}
893 +
894 +
895 +== Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding ==
896 +
897 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
898 +**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
899 +**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
900 +**Author(s):** Smith et al.
901 +**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
902 +**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
903 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Scienceย 
904 +
905 +**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
906 +
907 + **Key Statistics**
908 +
909 +1. **General Observations:**
910 + - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
911 + - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
912 +
913 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
914 + - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
915 + - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
916 +
917 + **Findings**
918 +
919 +- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
920 +- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
921 +
922 + **Relevance to Subproject**
923 +
924 +- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
925 +- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
926 +{{/expand}}
927 +
928 +
929 +----
930 +
931 += Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
932 +
933 +
934 +== Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018 ==
935 +
936 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
651 651  **Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
652 652  **Date of Publication:** *2020*
653 653  **Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
... ... @@ -655,7 +655,10 @@
655 655  **DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
656 656  **Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography*ย 
657 657  
658 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
944 +----
945 +
946 +## **Key Statistics**##
947 +
659 659  1. **General Observations:**
660 660   - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
661 661   - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
... ... @@ -667,9 +667,11 @@
667 667  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
668 668   - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
669 669   - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
670 -{{/expandable}}
671 671  
672 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
960 +----
961 +
962 +## **Findings**##
963 +
673 673  1. **Primary Observations:**
674 674   - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
675 675   - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
... ... @@ -681,9 +681,11 @@
681 681  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
682 682   - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
683 683   - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
684 -{{/expandable}}
685 685  
686 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
976 +----
977 +
978 +## **Critique and Observations**##
979 +
687 687  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
688 688   - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
689 689   - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
... ... @@ -695,32 +695,55 @@
695 695  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
696 696   - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
697 697   - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
698 -{{/expandable}}
699 699  
700 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
992 +----
993 +
994 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
701 701  - Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
702 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
703 -{{/expandable}}
996 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
704 704  
705 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
998 +----
999 +
1000 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1001 +
706 706  1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
707 707  2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
708 -{{/expandable}}
709 709  
710 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
711 -
712 -{{/expandable}}
713 -{{/expandable}}
1005 +----
714 714  
715 -{{expandable summary="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes โ€“ A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
716 -**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
717 -**Date of Publication:** *2012*
718 -**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
719 -**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
720 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
721 -**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*
1007 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1008 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.ย  ##
722 722  
723 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1010 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1011 +
1012 +----
1013 +
1014 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1015 +{{velocity}}
1016 +#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
1017 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
1018 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
1019 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
1020 +#else
1021 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">๐Ÿšจ PDF Not Available ๐Ÿšจ</span>{{/html}}
1022 +#end {{/velocity}}##
1023 +{{/expand}}
1024 +
1025 +
1026 +== Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes โ€“ A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ==
1027 +
1028 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes โ€“ A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
1029 +**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
1030 +**Date of Publication:** *2012*
1031 +**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
1032 +**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
1033 +**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
1034 +**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*ย 
1035 +
1036 +----
1037 +
1038 +## **Key Statistics**##
1039 +
724 724  1. **General Observations:**
725 725   - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
726 726   - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
... ... @@ -734,9 +734,11 @@
734 734   - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black motherโ€“Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
735 735   - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
736 736   - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
737 -{{/expandable}}
738 738  
739 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
1054 +----
1055 +
1056 +## **Findings**##
1057 +
740 740  1. **Primary Observations:**
741 741   - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
742 742   - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
... ... @@ -748,9 +748,11 @@
748 748  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
749 749   - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
750 750   - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
751 -{{/expandable}}
752 752  
753 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1070 +----
1071 +
1072 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1073 +
754 754  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
755 755   - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
756 756   - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
... ... @@ -762,34 +762,48 @@
762 762  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
763 763   - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
764 764   - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
765 -{{/expandable}}
766 766  
767 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1086 +----
1087 +
1088 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
768 768  - Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
769 769  - Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
770 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.
771 -{{/expandable}}
1091 +- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
772 772  
773 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1093 +----
1094 +
1095 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1096 +
774 774  1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
775 775  2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
776 776  3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
777 -{{/expandable}}
778 778  
779 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
780 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]
781 -{{/expandable}}
782 -{{/expandable}}
1101 +----
783 783  
784 -{{expandable summary="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
785 -**Source:** *Current Psychology*
786 -**Date of Publication:** *2024*
787 -**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
788 -**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
789 -**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
790 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
1103 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1104 +This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
791 791  
792 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1106 +----
1107 +
1108 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1109 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
1110 +{{/expand}}
1111 +
1112 +
1113 +== Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness ==
1114 +
1115 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
1116 +**Source:** *Current Psychology*
1117 +**Date of Publication:** *2024*
1118 +**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
1119 +**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
1120 +**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
1121 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*ย 
1122 +
1123 +----
1124 +
1125 +## **Key Statistics**##
1126 +
793 793  1. **General Observations:**
794 794   - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
795 795   - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
... ... @@ -801,9 +801,11 @@
801 801  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
802 802   - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
803 803   - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
804 -{{/expandable}}
805 805  
806 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
1139 +----
1140 +
1141 +## **Findings**##
1142 +
807 807  1. **Primary Observations:**
808 808   - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
809 809   - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
... ... @@ -815,9 +815,11 @@
815 815  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
816 816   - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
817 817   - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
818 -{{/expandable}}
819 819  
820 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1155 +----
1156 +
1157 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1158 +
821 821  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
822 822   - **First quantitative study** on incelsโ€™ social isolation and mental health.
823 823   - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
... ... @@ -829,36 +829,53 @@
829 829  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
830 830   - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
831 831   - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
832 -{{/expandable}}
833 833  
834 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1171 +----
1172 +
1173 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
835 835  - Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
836 836  - Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
837 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
838 -{{/expandable}}
1176 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
839 839  
840 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1178 +----
1179 +
1180 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1181 +
841 841  1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
842 842  2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
843 843  3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
844 -{{/expandable}}
845 845  
846 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
847 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
848 -{{/expandable}}
849 -{{/expandable}}
1186 +----
850 850  
1188 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1189 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
1190 +
1191 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1192 +
1193 +----
1194 +
1195 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1196 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
1197 +{{/expand}}
1198 +
1199 +
851 851  = Crime and Substance Abuse =
852 852  
853 -{{expandable summary="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
854 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
855 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
856 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
857 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
858 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
859 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
860 860  
861 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1203 +== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1204 +
1205 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1206 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1207 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1208 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1209 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1210 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1211 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*ย 
1212 +
1213 +----
1214 +
1215 +## **Key Statistics**##
1216 +
862 862  1. **General Observations:**
863 863   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
864 864   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -870,9 +870,11 @@
870 870  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
871 871   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
872 872   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
873 -{{/expandable}}
874 874  
875 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
1229 +----
1230 +
1231 +## **Findings**##
1232 +
876 876  1. **Primary Observations:**
877 877   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
878 878   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -884,9 +884,11 @@
884 884  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
885 885   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
886 886   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
887 -{{/expandable}}
888 888  
889 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1245 +----
1246 +
1247 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1248 +
890 890  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
891 891   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
892 892   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -898,34 +898,50 @@
898 898  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
899 899   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
900 900   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
901 -{{/expandable}}
902 902  
903 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1261 +----
1262 +
1263 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
904 904  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
905 905  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
906 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
907 -{{/expandable}}
1266 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
908 908  
909 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1268 +----
1269 +
1270 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1271 +
910 910  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
911 911  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
912 912  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
913 -{{/expandable}}
914 914  
915 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
916 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
917 -{{/expandable}}
918 -{{/expandable}}
1276 +----
919 919  
920 -{{expandable summary="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
921 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
922 -**Date of Publication:** *2003*
923 -**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
924 -**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
925 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
926 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1278 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1279 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
927 927  
928 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1281 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1282 +
1283 +----
1284 +
1285 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1286 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1287 +{{/expand}}
1288 +
1289 +
1290 +== Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1291 +
1292 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1293 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1294 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1295 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1296 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1297 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1298 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*ย 
1299 +
1300 +----
1301 +
1302 +## **Key Statistics**##
1303 +
929 929  1. **General Observations:**
930 930   - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
931 931   - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977โ€“2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
... ... @@ -937,62 +937,82 @@
937 937  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
938 938   - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
939 939   - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
940 -{{/expandable}}
941 941  
942 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
1316 +----
1317 +
1318 +## **Findings**##
1319 +
943 943  1. **Primary Observations:**
944 944   - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
945 945   - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
946 946  
947 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1324 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
948 948   - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
949 949   - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
950 950  
951 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1328 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
952 952   - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
953 953   - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
954 -{{/expandable}}
955 955  
956 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
957 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1332 +----
1333 +
1334 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1335 +
1336 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
958 958   - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
959 959   - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
960 960  
961 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1340 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
962 962   - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
963 963   - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
964 964  
965 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1344 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
966 966   - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
967 967   - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
968 -{{/expandable}}
969 969  
970 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1348 +----
1349 +
1350 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
971 971  - Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
972 972  - Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
973 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
974 -{{/expandable}}
1353 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
975 975  
976 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1355 +----
1356 +
1357 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1358 +
977 977  1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
978 978  2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
979 979  3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
980 -{{/expandable}}
981 981  
982 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
983 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
984 -{{/expandable}}
985 -{{/expandable}}
1363 +----
986 986  
987 -{{expandable summary="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
988 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
989 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
990 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
991 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
992 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
993 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1365 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1366 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
994 994  
995 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1368 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1369 +
1370 +----
1371 +
1372 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1373 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
1374 +{{/expand}}
1375 +
1376 +
1377 +== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1378 +
1379 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1380 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1381 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1382 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1383 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1384 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1385 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*ย 
1386 +
1387 +----
1388 +
1389 +## **Key Statistics**##
1390 +
996 996  1. **General Observations:**
997 997   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
998 998   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -1004,9 +1004,11 @@
1004 1004  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1005 1005   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1006 1006   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1007 -{{/expandable}}
1008 1008  
1009 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
1403 +----
1404 +
1405 +## **Findings**##
1406 +
1010 1010  1. **Primary Observations:**
1011 1011   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1012 1012   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -1018,9 +1018,11 @@
1018 1018  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1019 1019   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1020 1020   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1021 -{{/expandable}}
1022 1022  
1023 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1419 +----
1420 +
1421 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1422 +
1024 1024  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1025 1025   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1026 1026   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1032,36 +1032,117 @@
1032 1032  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1033 1033   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1034 1034   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1035 -{{/expandable}}
1036 1036  
1037 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1435 +----
1436 +
1437 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1038 1038  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1039 1039  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1040 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1041 -{{/expandable}}
1440 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1042 1042  
1043 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1442 +----
1443 +
1444 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1445 +
1044 1044  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1045 1045  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1046 1046  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1047 -{{/expandable}}
1048 1048  
1049 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1050 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1051 -{{/expandable}}
1052 -{{/expandable}}
1450 +----
1053 1053  
1054 -{{expandable summary="
1452 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1453 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1055 1055  
1056 -Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1057 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1058 -**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1059 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1060 -**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1061 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1062 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
1455 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1063 1063  
1064 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1457 +----
1458 +
1459 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1460 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1461 +{{/expand}}
1462 +
1463 +
1464 +== Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults ==
1465 +
1466 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1467 + Source: Addictive Behaviors
1468 +Date of Publication: 2016
1469 +Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
1470 +Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
1471 +DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
1472 +Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
1473 +
1474 +Key Statistics
1475 +General Observations:
1476 +
1477 +Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
1478 +Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
1479 +Subgroup Analysis:
1480 +
1481 +Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
1482 +Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
1483 +Other Significant Data Points:
1484 +
1485 +Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
1486 +Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
1487 +Findings
1488 +Primary Observations:
1489 +
1490 +Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
1491 +Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
1492 +Subgroup Trends:
1493 +
1494 +Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
1495 +College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
1496 +Specific Case Analysis:
1497 +
1498 +Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
1499 +Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
1500 +Critique and Observations
1501 +Strengths of the Study:
1502 +
1503 +Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
1504 +Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
1505 +Limitations of the Study:
1506 +
1507 +Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
1508 +Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
1509 +Suggestions for Improvement:
1510 +
1511 +Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
1512 +Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
1513 +Relevance to Subproject
1514 +Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
1515 +Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
1516 +Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
1517 +Suggestions for Further Exploration
1518 +Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
1519 +Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
1520 +Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
1521 +Summary of Research Study
1522 +This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
1523 +
1524 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1525 +
1526 +๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study
1527 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
1528 +{{/expand}}
1529 +
1530 +
1531 +== Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time? ==
1532 +
1533 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1534 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1535 +**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1536 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1537 +**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1538 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1539 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*ย 
1540 +
1541 +----
1542 +
1543 +## **Key Statistics**##
1544 +
1065 1065  1. **General Observations:**
1066 1066   - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884โ€“2004**.
1067 1067   - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
... ... @@ -1073,9 +1073,11 @@
1073 1073  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1074 1074   - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1075 1075   - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1076 -{{/expandable}}
1077 1077  
1078 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
1557 +----
1558 +
1559 +## **Findings**##
1560 +
1079 1079  1. **Primary Observations:**
1080 1080   - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1081 1081   - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
... ... @@ -1087,9 +1087,11 @@
1087 1087  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1088 1088   - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1089 1089   - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1090 -{{/expandable}}
1091 1091  
1092 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1573 +----
1574 +
1575 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1576 +
1093 1093  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1094 1094   - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1095 1095   - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
... ... @@ -1101,36 +1101,52 @@
1101 1101  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1102 1102   - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1103 1103   - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1104 -{{/expandable}}
1105 1105  
1106 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1589 +----
1590 +
1591 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1107 1107  - Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1108 1108  - Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1109 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
1110 -{{/expandable}}
1594 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1111 1111  
1112 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1596 +----
1597 +
1598 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1599 +
1113 1113  1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1114 1114  2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1115 1115  3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1116 -{{/expandable}}
1117 1117  
1118 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1119 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
1120 -{{/expandable}}
1121 -{{/expandable}}
1604 +----
1122 1122  
1606 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1607 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.ย  ##
1608 +
1609 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1610 +
1611 +----
1612 +
1613 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1614 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
1615 +{{/expand}}
1616 +
1617 +
1123 1123  = Whiteness & White Guilt =
1124 1124  
1125 -{{expandable summary="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1126 -**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1127 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1128 -**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1129 -**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1130 -**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1131 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
1620 +== Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports ==
1132 1132  
1133 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1622 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1623 +**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1624 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1625 +**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1626 +**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1627 +**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1628 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*ย 
1629 +
1630 +----
1631 +
1632 +## **Key Statistics**##
1633 +
1134 1134  1. **General Observations:**
1135 1135   - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1136 1136   - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
... ... @@ -1142,9 +1142,11 @@
1142 1142  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1143 1143   - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1144 1144   - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1145 -{{/expandable}}
1146 1146  
1147 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
1646 +----
1647 +
1648 +## **Findings**##
1649 +
1148 1148  1. **Primary Observations:**
1149 1149   - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1150 1150   - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
... ... @@ -1156,9 +1156,11 @@
1156 1156  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1157 1157   - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1158 1158   - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1159 -{{/expandable}}
1160 1160  
1161 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1662 +----
1663 +
1664 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1665 +
1162 1162  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1163 1163   - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1164 1164   - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
... ... @@ -1170,34 +1170,50 @@
1170 1170  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1171 1171   - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1172 1172   - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1173 -{{/expandable}}
1174 1174  
1175 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1678 +----
1679 +
1680 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1176 1176  - Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1177 1177  - Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1178 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
1179 -{{/expandable}}
1683 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1180 1180  
1181 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1685 +----
1686 +
1687 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1688 +
1182 1182  1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1183 1183  2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1184 1184  3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1185 -{{/expandable}}
1186 1186  
1187 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1188 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
1189 -{{/expandable}}
1190 -{{/expandable}}
1693 +----
1191 1191  
1192 -{{expandable summary="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1193 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1194 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1195 -**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1695 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1696 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
1697 +
1698 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1699 +
1700 +----
1701 +
1702 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1703 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
1704 +{{/expand}}
1705 +
1706 +
1707 +== Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations ==
1708 +
1709 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1710 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1711 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1712 +**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1196 1196  **Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1197 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1198 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1714 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1715 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*ย 
1199 1199  
1200 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1717 +----
1718 +
1719 +## **Key Statistics**##
1720 +
1201 1201  1. **General Observations:**
1202 1202   - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1203 1203   - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
... ... @@ -1209,9 +1209,11 @@
1209 1209  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1210 1210   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1211 1211   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1212 -{{/expandable}}
1213 1213  
1214 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
1733 +----
1734 +
1735 +## **Findings**##
1736 +
1215 1215  1. **Primary Observations:**
1216 1216   - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1217 1217   - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
... ... @@ -1223,9 +1223,11 @@
1223 1223  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1224 1224   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1225 1225   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1226 -{{/expandable}}
1227 1227  
1228 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1749 +----
1750 +
1751 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1752 +
1229 1229  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1230 1230   - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1231 1231   - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
... ... @@ -1237,34 +1237,50 @@
1237 1237  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1238 1238   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1239 1239   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1240 -{{/expandable}}
1241 1241  
1242 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1765 +----
1766 +
1767 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1243 1243  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1244 1244  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1245 -- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1246 -{{/expandable}}
1770 +- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1247 1247  
1248 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1772 +----
1773 +
1774 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1775 +
1249 1249  1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1250 1250  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1251 1251  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1252 -{{/expandable}}
1253 1253  
1254 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1255 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1256 -{{/expandable}}
1257 -{{/expandable}}
1780 +----
1258 1258  
1259 -{{expandable summary="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1260 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1261 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1262 -**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1263 -**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1264 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1265 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1782 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1783 +This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
1266 1266  
1267 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1785 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1786 +
1787 +----
1788 +
1789 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1790 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
1791 +{{/expand}}
1792 +
1793 +
1794 +== Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans ==
1795 +
1796 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1797 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1798 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1799 +**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1800 +**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1801 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1802 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*ย 
1803 +
1804 +----
1805 +
1806 +## **Key Statistics**##
1807 +
1268 1268  1. **General Observations:**
1269 1269   - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45โ€“54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1270 1270   - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
... ... @@ -1276,9 +1276,11 @@
1276 1276  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1277 1277   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1278 1278   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1279 -{{/expandable}}
1280 1280  
1281 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
1820 +----
1821 +
1822 +## **Findings**##
1823 +
1282 1282  1. **Primary Observations:**
1283 1283   - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1284 1284   - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
... ... @@ -1290,9 +1290,11 @@
1290 1290  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1291 1291   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1292 1292   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1293 -{{/expandable}}
1294 1294  
1295 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1836 +----
1837 +
1838 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1839 +
1296 1296  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1297 1297   - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1298 1298   - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
... ... @@ -1304,34 +1304,50 @@
1304 1304  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1305 1305   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1306 1306   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1307 -{{/expandable}}
1308 1308  
1309 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1852 +----
1853 +
1854 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1310 1310  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1311 1311  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1312 -- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1313 -{{/expandable}}
1857 +- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1314 1314  
1315 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1859 +----
1860 +
1861 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1862 +
1316 1316  1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1317 1317  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1318 1318  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1319 -{{/expandable}}
1320 1320  
1321 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1322 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1323 -{{/expandable}}
1324 -{{/expandable}}
1867 +----
1325 1325  
1326 -{{expandable summary="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Todayโ€™s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1327 -**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1328 -**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1329 -**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1330 -**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Todayโ€™s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1331 -**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1332 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1869 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1870 +This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
1333 1333  
1334 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1872 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1873 +
1874 +----
1875 +
1876 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1877 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
1878 +{{/expand}}
1879 +
1880 +
1881 +== Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Todayโ€™s Superdiverse Cities? ==
1882 +
1883 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Todayโ€™s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1884 +**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1885 +**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1886 +**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1887 +**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Todayโ€™s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1888 +**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1889 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*ย 
1890 +
1891 +----
1892 +
1893 +## **Key Statistics**##
1894 +
1335 1335  1. **General Observations:**
1336 1336   - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1337 1337   - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
... ... @@ -1343,9 +1343,11 @@
1343 1343  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1344 1344   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1345 1345   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1346 -{{/expandable}}
1347 1347  
1348 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
1907 +----
1908 +
1909 +## **Findings**##
1910 +
1349 1349  1. **Primary Observations:**
1350 1350   - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1351 1351   - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
... ... @@ -1357,9 +1357,11 @@
1357 1357  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1358 1358   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1359 1359   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1360 -{{/expandable}}
1361 1361  
1362 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1923 +----
1924 +
1925 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1926 +
1363 1363  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1364 1364   - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1365 1365   - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
... ... @@ -1371,36 +1371,53 @@
1371 1371  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1372 1372   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1373 1373   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1374 -{{/expandable}}
1375 1375  
1376 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1939 +----
1940 +
1941 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1377 1377  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1378 1378  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1379 -- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1380 -{{/expandable}}
1944 +- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
1381 1381  
1382 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1946 +----
1947 +
1948 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1949 +
1383 1383  1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1384 1384  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1385 1385  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1386 -{{/expandable}}
1387 1387  
1388 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1389 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1390 -{{/expandable}}
1391 -{{/expandable}}
1954 +----
1392 1392  
1956 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1957 +This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
1958 +
1959 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the studyโ€™s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1960 +
1961 +----
1962 +
1963 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
1964 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
1965 +{{/expand}}
1966 +
1967 +
1393 1393  = Media =
1394 1394  
1395 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic"}}
1396 -**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1397 -**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1398 -**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1399 -**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1400 -**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1401 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*
1402 1402  
1403 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
1971 +== Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic ==
1972 +
1973 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"}}
1974 +**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1975 +**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1976 +**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1977 +**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1978 +**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1979 +**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*ย 
1980 +
1981 +----
1982 +
1983 +## **Key Statistics**##
1984 +
1404 1404  1. **General Observations:**
1405 1405   - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1406 1406   - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
... ... @@ -1412,9 +1412,11 @@
1412 1412  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1413 1413   - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1414 1414   - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1415 -{{/expandable}}
1416 1416  
1417 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
1997 +----
1998 +
1999 +## **Findings**##
2000 +
1418 1418  1. **Primary Observations:**
1419 1419   - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1420 1420   - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
... ... @@ -1426,9 +1426,11 @@
1426 1426  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1427 1427   - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1428 1428   - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1429 -{{/expandable}}
1430 1430  
1431 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
2013 +----
2014 +
2015 +## **Critique and Observations**##
2016 +
1432 1432  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1433 1433   - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1434 1434   - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
... ... @@ -1440,34 +1440,48 @@
1440 1440  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1441 1441   - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1442 1442   - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1443 -{{/expandable}}
1444 1444  
1445 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
2029 +----
2030 +
2031 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1446 1446  - Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
1447 1447  - Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1448 -- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
1449 -{{/expandable}}
2034 +- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
1450 1450  
1451 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
2036 +----
2037 +
2038 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2039 +
1452 1452  1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
1453 1453  2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1454 1454  3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1455 -{{/expandable}}
1456 1456  
1457 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1458 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
1459 -{{/expandable}}
1460 -{{/expandable}}
2044 +----
1461 1461  
1462 -{{expandable summary="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
1463 -**Source:** *Politics & Policy*
1464 -**Date of Publication:** *2007*
1465 -**Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
1466 -**Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
1467 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
1468 -**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*
2046 +## **Summary of Research Study**
2047 +This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
1469 1469  
1470 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
2049 +----
2050 +
2051 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
2052 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
2053 +{{/expand}}
2054 +
2055 +
2056 +== Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions ==
2057 +
2058 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
2059 +**Source:** *Politics & Policy*
2060 +**Date of Publication:** *2007*
2061 +**Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
2062 +**Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
2063 +**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
2064 +**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*ย 
2065 +
2066 +----
2067 +
2068 +## **Key Statistics**##
2069 +
1471 1471  1. **General Observations:**
1472 1472   - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
1473 1473   - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
... ... @@ -1479,9 +1479,11 @@
1479 1479  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1480 1480   - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
1481 1481   - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
1482 -{{/expandable}}
1483 1483  
1484 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
2082 +----
2083 +
2084 +## **Findings**##
2085 +
1485 1485  1. **Primary Observations:**
1486 1486   - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
1487 1487   - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
... ... @@ -1493,9 +1493,11 @@
1493 1493  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1494 1494   - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
1495 1495   - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
1496 -{{/expandable}}
1497 1497  
1498 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
2098 +----
2099 +
2100 +## **Critique and Observations**##
2101 +
1499 1499  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1500 1500   - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
1501 1501   - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
... ... @@ -1507,34 +1507,48 @@
1507 1507  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1508 1508   - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
1509 1509   - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
1510 -{{/expandable}}
1511 1511  
1512 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
2114 +----
2115 +
2116 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1513 1513  - Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
1514 1514  - Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
1515 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.
1516 -{{/expandable}}
2119 +- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
1517 1517  
1518 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
2121 +----
2122 +
2123 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2124 +
1519 1519  1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
1520 1520  2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
1521 1521  3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
1522 -{{/expandable}}
1523 1523  
1524 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1525 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]
1526 -{{/expandable}}
1527 -{{/expandable}}
2129 +----
1528 1528  
1529 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
1530 -**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
1531 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1532 -**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
1533 -**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
1534 -**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
1535 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*
2131 +## **Summary of Research Study**
2132 +This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
1536 1536  
1537 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
2134 +----
2135 +
2136 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
2137 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
2138 +{{/expand}}
2139 +
2140 +
2141 +== Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion ==
2142 +
2143 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
2144 +**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
2145 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
2146 +**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
2147 +**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
2148 +**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2149 +**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*ย 
2150 +
2151 +----
2152 +
2153 +## **Key Statistics**##
2154 +
1538 1538  1. **General Observations:**
1539 1539   - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
1540 1540   - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
... ... @@ -1546,9 +1546,11 @@
1546 1546  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1547 1547   - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
1548 1548   - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
1549 -{{/expandable}}
1550 1550  
1551 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
2167 +----
2168 +
2169 +## **Findings**##
2170 +
1552 1552  1. **Primary Observations:**
1553 1553   - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
1554 1554   - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
... ... @@ -1560,9 +1560,11 @@
1560 1560  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1561 1561   - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
1562 1562   - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
1563 -{{/expandable}}
1564 1564  
1565 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
2183 +----
2184 +
2185 +## **Critique and Observations**##
2186 +
1566 1566  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1567 1567   - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
1568 1568   - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
... ... @@ -1574,127 +1574,29 @@
1574 1574  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1575 1575   - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
1576 1576   - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
1577 -{{/expandable}}
1578 1578  
1579 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
2199 +----
2200 +
2201 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1580 1580  - Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
1581 1581  - Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
1582 -- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
1583 -{{/expandable}}
2204 +- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
1584 1584  
1585 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
2206 +----
2207 +
2208 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2209 +
1586 1586  1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
1587 1587  2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
1588 1588  3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
1589 -{{/expandable}}
1590 1590  
1591 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1592 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
1593 -{{/expandable}}
1594 -{{/expandable}}
2214 +----
1595 1595  
1596 -{{expandable summary="Study: White Americansโ€™ Preference for Black People in Advertising Has Increased in the Past 66 Years"}}
1597 -Source: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1598 -Date of Publication: February 20, 2024
1599 -Author(s): Julia Diana Lenk, Jochen Hartmann, Henrik Sattler
1600 -Title: "White Americansโ€™ Preference for Black People in Advertising Has Increased in the Past 66 Years: A Meta-Analysis"
1601 -DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2307505121
1602 -Subject Matter: Advertising, Race, Consumer Behavior, Meta-Analysis
2216 +## **Summary of Research Study**
2217 +This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
1603 1603  
1604 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Š Key Statistics"}}
2219 +----
1605 1605  
1606 -Study Scale:
1607 -
1608 -62 studies, 332 effect sizes, 10,186 participants (Black and White Americans).
1609 -
1610 -Covers the period 1956โ€“2022.
1611 -
1612 -Cohenโ€™s d Effect Sizes (Model-Free):
1613 -
1614 -Black viewers: d = 0.50 โ†’ strong, consistent ingroup preference for Black models.
1615 -
1616 -White viewers: d = โ€“0.08 overall; pre-2000: d = โ€“0.16 (ingroup); post-2000: d = +0.02 (outgroup leaning).
1617 -
1618 -Regression Findings:
1619 -
1620 -White viewersโ€™ preference for Black models increases by ~0.0128 d/year since 1956 (p < 0.05).
1621 -
1622 -By 2022, White viewers showed positive directional preference for Black endorsers.
1623 -
1624 -Black viewer preferences remained stable across the 66 years.
1625 -{{/expandable}}
1626 -
1627 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ”ฌ Findings"}}
1628 -
1629 -Primary Observations:
1630 -
1631 -Ingroup favoritism is evident: Black viewers consistently prefer Black endorsers.
1632 -
1633 -White viewersโ€™ preferences have shifted significantly over time toward favoring Black endorsers.
1634 -
1635 -Temporal Trends:
1636 -
1637 -Turning point: Around 2002โ€“2003, White viewers began showing a positive (though small) preference for Black endorsers.
1638 -
1639 -Moderator Effects:
1640 -
1641 -Low anti-Black prejudice and low White ethnic identification correlate with greater White preference for Black endorsers.
1642 -
1643 -Economic hardship (e.g., high unemployment) slightly reduces White preference for Black endorsers.
1644 -
1645 -Identification Model:
1646 -
1647 -Preference changes are stronger when outcomes measure identification with endorsers (e.g., similarity, attractiveness).
1648 -{{/expandable}}
1649 -
1650 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“ Critique & Observations"}}
1651 -
1652 -Strengths of the Study:
1653 -
1654 -Longest-running meta-analysis on interracial preferences in advertising.
1655 -
1656 -Includes multilevel modeling and 21 meta-analytic covariates.
1657 -
1658 -Accounts for both perceiver and societal context, and controls for publication bias.
1659 -
1660 -Limitations:
1661 -
1662 -Only examines Black and White racial dynamicsโ€”doesnโ€™t cover Hispanic, Asian, or multiracial groups.
1663 -
1664 -72% of effect sizes are from student samples (not fully generalizable).
1665 -
1666 -Social desirability bias may affect lab-based responses.
1667 -
1668 -Suggestions for Improvement:
1669 -
1670 -Include field experiments and more representative samples (age, class, ideology).
1671 -
1672 -Examine how Black models are portrayed, not just if they are shown.
1673 -
1674 -Extend research to other racial groups and multiracial representations.
1675 -{{/expandable}}
1676 -
1677 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“Œ Relevance to Subproject"}}
1678 -
1679 -Provides empirical support for the dynamic shift in White American attitudes over time.
1680 -
1681 -Directly informs discussions about media representation, consumer behavior, and racial identity.
1682 -
1683 -Supports policy and commercial arguments for including more diverse models in advertising.
1684 -{{/expandable}}
1685 -
1686 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ” Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1687 -
1688 -Expand analysis to Latino, Asian, and multiracial models in media.
1689 -
1690 -Study real-world (non-lab) consumer reactions to racial diversity in advertising.
1691 -
1692 -Investigate how economic anxiety influences racial preferences in other domains (e.g., hiring, education).
1693 -
1694 -Explore how virtual influencers or AI-generated models affect racial perceptions.
1695 -{{/expandable}}
1696 -
1697 -{{expandable summary="๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study"}}
1698 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:lenk-et-al-white-americans-preference-for-black-people-in-advertising-has-increased-in-the-past-66-years-a-meta-analysis.pdf]]
1699 -{{/expandable}}
1700 -{{/expandable}}
2221 +## **๐Ÿ“„ Download Full Study**
2222 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
2223 +{{/expand}}
lenk-et-al-white-americans-preference-for-black-people-in-advertising-has-increased-in-the-past-66-years-a-meta-analysis.pdf
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2.1 MB
Content