0 Votes

Changes for page Research at a Glance

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/06/26 03:09

From version 105.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/04/16 02:46
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 92.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/04/16 00:27
Change comment: Rollback to version 89.1

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,7 +5,3 @@
1 -
2 -{{toc/}}
3 -
4 -
5 5  = Research at a Glance =
6 6  
7 7  
... ... @@ -11,8 +11,93 @@
11 11  
12 12   There is often an underlying hypocrisy or double standard, saying the quiet part out loud, or conclusions that are so much of an antithesis to what the data shows that made me want to include it. At least, thats the idea for once its polished. I have about 150 more studies to upload, so it will be a few weeks before I get through it all. Until such time, feel free to search for them yourself and edit in what you find, or add your own studies. If you like you can do it manually, or if you'd rather go the route I did, just rename the study to its doi number and feed the study into an AI and tell them to summarize the study using the following format:
13 13  
10 +{{example}}
11 +~= Study: [Study Title] =
14 14  
13 +~{~{expand title="Study: [Study Title] (Click to Expand)" expanded="false"}}
14 +~*~*Source:~*~* *[Journal/Institution Name]*
15 +~*~*Date of Publication:~*~* *[Publication Date]*
16 +~*~*Author(s):~*~* *[Author(s) Name(s)]*
17 +~*~*Title:~*~* *"[Study Title]"*
18 +~*~*DOI:~*~* [DOI or Link]
19 +~*~*Subject Matter:~*~* *[Broad Research Area, e.g., Social Psychology, Public Policy, Behavioral Economics]* 
15 15  
21 +~-~--
22 +
23 +~#~# ~*~*Key Statistics~*~*
24 +~1. ~*~*General Observations:~*~*
25 + - [Statistical finding or observation]
26 + - [Statistical finding or observation]
27 +
28 +2. ~*~*Subgroup Analysis:~*~*
29 + - [Breakdown of findings by gender, race, or other subgroups]
30 +
31 +3. ~*~*Other Significant Data Points:~*~*
32 + - [Any additional findings or significant statistics]
33 +
34 +~-~--
35 +
36 +~#~# ~*~*Findings~*~*
37 +~1. ~*~*Primary Observations:~*~*
38 + - [High-level findings or trends in the study]
39 +
40 +2. ~*~*Subgroup Trends:~*~*
41 + - [Disparities or differences highlighted in the study]
42 +
43 +3. ~*~*Specific Case Analysis:~*~*
44 + - [Detailed explanation of any notable specific findings]
45 +
46 +~-~--
47 +
48 +~#~# ~*~*Critique and Observations~*~*
49 +~1. ~*~*Strengths of the Study:~*~*
50 + - [Examples: strong methodology, large dataset, etc.]
51 +
52 +2. ~*~*Limitations of the Study:~*~*
53 + - [Examples: data gaps, lack of upstream analysis, etc.]
54 +
55 +3. ~*~*Suggestions for Improvement:~*~*
56 + - [Ideas for further research or addressing limitations]
57 +
58 +~-~--
59 +
60 +~#~# ~*~*Relevance to Subproject~*~*
61 +- [Explanation of how this study contributes to your subproject goals.]
62 +- [Any key arguments or findings that support or challenge your views.]
63 +
64 +~-~--
65 +
66 +~#~# ~*~*Suggestions for Further Exploration~*~*
67 +~1. [Research questions or areas to investigate further.]
68 +2. [Potential studies or sources to complement this analysis.]
69 +
70 +~-~--
71 +
72 +~#~# ~*~*Summary of Research Study~*~*
73 +This study examines ~*~*[core research question or focus]~*~*, providing insights into ~*~*[main subject area]~*~*. The research utilized ~*~*[sample size and methodology]~*~* to assess ~*~*[key variables or measured outcomes]~*~*. 
74 +
75 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
76 +
77 +~-~--
78 +
79 +~#~# ~*~*📄 Download Full Study~*~*
80 +~{~{velocity}}
81 +#set($doi = "[Insert DOI Here]")
82 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
83 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach~:$filename"))
84 +~[~[Download Full Study>>attach~:$filename]]
85 +#else
86 +~{~{html}}<span style="color:red; font-weight:bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>~{~{/html}}
87 +#end
88 +~{~{/velocity}}
89 +
90 +~{~{/expand}}
91 +
92 +
93 +{{/example}}
94 +
95 +
96 +
16 16  - Click on a **category** in the **Table of Contents** to browse studies related to that topic.
17 17  - Click on a **study title** to expand its details, including **key findings, critique, and relevance**.
18 18  - Use the **search function** (Ctrl + F or XWiki's built-in search) to quickly find specific topics or authors.
... ... @@ -20,16 +20,18 @@
20 20  - You'll also find a download link to the original full study in pdf form at the bottom of the collapsible block.
21 21  
22 22  
104 +{{toc/}}
23 23  
24 24  
25 25  
26 26  
27 27  
28 -
29 29  = Genetics =
30 30  
31 31  
32 -{{expandable summary="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
113 +== Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History ==
114 +
115 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Reconstructing Indian Population History"}}
33 33  **Source:** *Nature*
34 34  **Date of Publication:** *2009*
35 35  **Author(s):** *David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price, Lalji Singh*
... ... @@ -37,7 +37,10 @@
37 37  **DOI:** [10.1038/nature08365](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08365)
38 38  **Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Population History, South Asian Ancestry* 
39 39  
40 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
123 +----
124 +
125 +## **Key Statistics**##
126 +
41 41  1. **General Observations:**
42 42   - Study analyzed **132 individuals from 25 diverse Indian groups**.
43 43   - Identified two major ancestral populations: **Ancestral North Indians (ANI)** and **Ancestral South Indians (ASI)**.
... ... @@ -49,9 +49,11 @@
49 49  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
50 50   - ANI ancestry ranges from **39% to 71%** across Indian groups.
51 51   - **Caste and linguistic differences** strongly correlate with genetic variation.
52 -{{/expandable}}
53 53  
54 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
139 +----
140 +
141 +## **Findings**##
142 +
55 55  1. **Primary Observations:**
56 56   - The genetic landscape of India has been shaped by **thousands of years of endogamy**.
57 57   - Groups with **only ASI ancestry no longer exist** in mainland India.
... ... @@ -63,9 +63,11 @@
63 63  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
64 64   - **Founder effects** have maintained allele frequency differences among Indian groups.
65 65   - Predicts **higher incidence of recessive diseases** due to historical genetic isolation.
66 -{{/expandable}}
67 67  
68 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
155 +----
156 +
157 +## **Critique and Observations**##
158 +
69 69  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
70 70   - **First large-scale genetic analysis** of Indian population history.
71 71   - Introduces **new methods for ancestry estimation without direct ancestral reference groups**.
... ... @@ -77,34 +77,50 @@
77 77  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
78 78   - Future research should **expand sampling across more Indian tribal groups**.
79 79   - Use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer resolution of ancestry.
80 -{{/expandable}}
81 81  
82 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
171 +----
172 +
173 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
83 83  - Provides a **genetic basis for caste and linguistic diversity** in India.
84 84  - Highlights **founder effects and genetic drift** shaping South Asian populations.
85 -- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.
86 -{{/expandable}}
176 +- Supports research on **medical genetics and disease risk prediction** in Indian populations.##
87 87  
88 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
178 +----
179 +
180 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
181 +
89 89  1. Examine **genetic markers linked to disease susceptibility** in Indian subpopulations.
90 90  2. Investigate the impact of **recent migration patterns on ANI-ASI ancestry distribution**.
91 91  3. Study **gene flow between Indian populations and other global groups**.
92 -{{/expandable}}
93 93  
94 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
95 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]
96 -{{/expandable}}
97 -{{/expandable}}
186 +----
98 98  
99 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
100 -**Source:** *Nature*
101 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
102 -**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
103 -**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
104 -**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
105 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics*
188 +## **Summary of Research Study**
189 +This study reconstructs **the genetic history of India**, revealing two ancestral populations—**ANI (related to West Eurasians) and ASI (distinctly South Asian)**. By analyzing **25 diverse Indian groups**, the researchers demonstrate how **historical endogamy and founder effects** have maintained genetic differentiation. The findings have **implications for medical genetics, population history, and the study of South Asian ancestry**.##
106 106  
107 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
191 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
192 +
193 +----
194 +
195 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
196 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature08365.pdf]]##
197 +{{/expand}}
198 +
199 +
200 +== Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations ==
201 +
202 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"}}
203 +**Source:** *Nature*
204 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
205 +**Author(s):** *David Reich, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Mark Lipson, and others*
206 +**Title:** *"The Simons Genome Diversity Project: 300 Genomes from 142 Diverse Populations"*
207 +**DOI:** [10.1038/nature18964](https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18964)
208 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Genetic Diversity, Population History, Evolutionary Genomics* 
209 +
210 +----
211 +
212 +## **Key Statistics**##
213 +
108 108  1. **General Observations:**
109 109   - Analyzed **high-coverage genome sequences of 300 individuals from 142 populations**.
110 110   - Included **many underrepresented and indigenous groups** from Africa, Asia, Europe, and the Americas.
... ... @@ -116,9 +116,11 @@
116 116  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
117 117   - Identified **5.8 million base pairs absent from the human reference genome**.
118 118   - Estimated that **mutations have accumulated 5% faster in non-Africans than in Africans**.
119 -{{/expandable}}
120 120  
121 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
226 +----
227 +
228 +## **Findings**##
229 +
122 122  1. **Primary Observations:**
123 123   - **African populations harbor the greatest genetic diversity**, confirming an out-of-Africa dispersal model.
124 124   - Indigenous Australians and New Guineans **share a common ancestral population with other non-Africans**.
... ... @@ -130,9 +130,11 @@
130 130  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
131 131   - **Neanderthal ancestry is higher in East Asians than in Europeans**.
132 132   - African hunter-gatherer groups show **deep population splits over 100,000 years ago**.
133 -{{/expandable}}
134 134  
135 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
242 +----
243 +
244 +## **Critique and Observations**##
245 +
136 136  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
137 137   - **Largest global genetic dataset** outside of the 1000 Genomes Project.
138 138   - High sequencing depth allows **more accurate identification of genetic variants**.
... ... @@ -144,37 +144,50 @@
144 144  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
145 145   - Future studies should include **ancient genomes** to improve demographic modeling.
146 146   - Expand research into **how genetic variation affects health outcomes** across populations.
147 -{{/expandable}}
148 148  
149 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
258 +----
259 +
260 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
150 150  - Provides **comprehensive data on human genetic diversity**, useful for **evolutionary studies**.
151 151  - Supports research on **Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression** in modern human populations.
152 -- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.
153 -{{/expandable}}
263 +- Enhances understanding of **genetic adaptation and disease susceptibility across groups**.##
154 154  
155 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
265 +----
266 +
267 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
268 +
156 156  1. Investigate **functional consequences of genetic variation in underrepresented populations**.
157 157  2. Study **how selection pressures shaped genetic diversity across different environments**.
158 158  3. Explore **medical applications of population-specific genetic markers**.
159 -{{/expandable}}
160 160  
161 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
162 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]
163 -{{/expandable}}
164 -{{/expandable}}
273 +----
165 165  
166 -{{expandable summary="
275 +## **Summary of Research Study**
276 +This study presents **high-coverage genome sequences from 300 individuals across 142 populations**, offering **new insights into global genetic diversity and human evolution**. The findings highlight **deep African population splits, widespread archaic ancestry in non-Africans, and unique variants absent from the human reference genome**. The research enhances our understanding of **migration patterns, adaptation, and evolutionary history**.##
167 167  
278 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
168 168  
169 -Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
170 -**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
171 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
172 -**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
173 -**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
174 -**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
175 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science*
280 +----
176 176  
177 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
282 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
283 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nature18964.pdf]]##
284 +{{/expand}}
285 +
286 +
287 +== Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies ==
288 +
289 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"}}
290 +**Source:** *Nature Genetics*
291 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
292 +**Author(s):** *Tinca J. C. Polderman, Beben Benyamin, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Patrick F. Sullivan, Arjen van Bochoven, Peter M. Visscher, Danielle Posthuma*
293 +**Title:** *"Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies"*
294 +**DOI:** [10.1038/ng.328](https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.328)
295 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Heritability, Twin Studies, Behavioral Science* 
296 +
297 +----
298 +
299 +## **Key Statistics**##
300 +
178 178  1. **General Observations:**
179 179   - Analyzed **17,804 traits from 2,748 twin studies** published between **1958 and 2012**.
180 180   - Included data from **14,558,903 twin pairs**, making it the largest meta-analysis on human heritability.
... ... @@ -186,9 +186,11 @@
186 186  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
187 187   - **Neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric traits** showed the highest heritability estimates.
188 188   - Traits related to **social values and environmental interactions** had lower heritability estimates.
189 -{{/expandable}}
190 190  
191 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
313 +----
314 +
315 +## **Findings**##
316 +
192 192  1. **Primary Observations:**
193 193   - Across all traits, genetic factors play a significant role in individual differences.
194 194   - The study contradicts models that **overestimate environmental effects in behavioral and cognitive traits**.
... ... @@ -200,9 +200,11 @@
200 200  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
201 201   - Twin correlations suggest **limited evidence for strong non-additive genetic influences**.
202 202   - The study highlights **missing heritability in complex traits**, which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have yet to fully explain.
203 -{{/expandable}}
204 204  
205 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
329 +----
330 +
331 +## **Critique and Observations**##
332 +
206 206  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
207 207   - **Largest-ever heritability meta-analysis**, covering nearly all published twin studies.
208 208   - Provides a **comprehensive framework for understanding gene-environment contributions**.
... ... @@ -214,29 +214,39 @@
214 214  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
215 215   - Future research should use **whole-genome sequencing** for finer-grained heritability estimates.
216 216   - **Incorporate non-Western populations** to assess global heritability trends.
217 -{{/expandable}}
218 218  
219 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
345 +----
346 +
347 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
220 220  - Establishes a **quantitative benchmark for heritability across human traits**.
221 221  - Reinforces **genetic influence on cognitive, behavioral, and physical traits**.
222 -- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.
223 -{{/expandable}}
350 +- Highlights the need for **genome-wide studies to identify missing heritability**.##
224 224  
225 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
352 +----
353 +
354 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
355 +
226 226  1. Investigate how **heritability estimates compare across different socioeconomic backgrounds**.
227 227  2. Examine **gene-environment interactions in cognitive and psychiatric traits**.
228 228  3. Explore **non-additive genetic effects on human traits using newer statistical models**.
229 -{{/expandable}}
230 230  
231 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
232 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]
233 -{{/expandable}}
234 -{{/expandable}}
360 +----
235 235  
236 -{{expandable summary="
362 +## **Summary of Research Study**
363 +This study presents a **comprehensive meta-analysis of human trait heritability**, covering **over 50 years of twin research**. The findings confirm **genes play a predominant role in shaping human traits**, with an **average heritability of 49%** across all measured characteristics. The research offers **valuable insights into genetic and environmental influences**, guiding future gene-mapping efforts and behavioral genetics studies.##
237 237  
365 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
238 238  
239 -Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
367 +----
368 +
369 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
370 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_ng.328.pdf]]##
371 +{{/expand}}
372 +
373 +
374 +== Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease ==
375 +
376 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Genetic Analysis of African Populations: Human Evolution and Complex Disease"}}
240 240  **Source:** *Nature Reviews Genetics*
241 241  **Date of Publication:** *2002*
242 242  **Author(s):** *Sarah A. Tishkoff, Scott M. Williams*
... ... @@ -244,7 +244,10 @@
244 244  **DOI:** [10.1038/nrg865](https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg865)
245 245  **Subject Matter:** *Population Genetics, Human Evolution, Complex Diseases* 
246 246  
247 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
384 +----
385 +
386 +## **Key Statistics**##
387 +
248 248  1. **General Observations:**
249 249   - Africa harbors **the highest genetic diversity** of any region, making it key to understanding human evolution.
250 250   - The study analyzes **genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in African populations**.
... ... @@ -256,9 +256,11 @@
256 256  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
257 257   - The **effective population size (Ne) of Africans** is higher than that of non-African populations.
258 258   - LD blocks are **shorter in African genomes**, suggesting more historical recombination events.
259 -{{/expandable}}
260 260  
261 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
400 +----
401 +
402 +## **Findings**##
403 +
262 262  1. **Primary Observations:**
263 263   - African populations are the **most genetically diverse**, supporting the *Recent African Origin* hypothesis.
264 264   - Genetic variation in African populations can **help fine-map complex disease genes**.
... ... @@ -270,9 +270,11 @@
270 270  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
271 271   - Admixture in African Americans includes **West African and European genetic contributions**.
272 272   - SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) diversity in African genomes **exceeds that of non-African groups**.
273 -{{/expandable}}
274 274  
275 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
416 +----
417 +
418 +## **Critique and Observations**##
419 +
276 276  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
277 277   - Provides **comprehensive genetic analysis** of diverse African populations.
278 278   - Highlights **how genetic diversity impacts health disparities and disease risks**.
... ... @@ -284,37 +284,50 @@
284 284  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
285 285   - Expand research into **underrepresented African populations**.
286 286   - Integrate **whole-genome sequencing for a more detailed evolutionary timeline**.
287 -{{/expandable}}
288 288  
289 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
432 +----
433 +
434 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
290 290  - Supports **genetic models of human evolution** and the **out-of-Africa hypothesis**.
291 291  - Reinforces **Africa’s key role in disease gene mapping and precision medicine**.
292 -- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.
293 -{{/expandable}}
437 +- Provides insight into **historical migration patterns and their genetic impact**.##
294 294  
295 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
439 +----
440 +
441 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
442 +
296 296  1. Investigate **genetic adaptations to local environments within Africa**.
297 297  2. Study **the role of African genetic diversity in disease resistance**.
298 298  3. Expand research on **how ancient migration patterns shaped modern genetic structure**.
299 -{{/expandable}}
300 300  
301 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
302 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]
303 -{{/expandable}}
304 -{{/expandable}}
447 +----
305 305  
306 -{{expandable summary="
449 +## **Summary of Research Study**
450 +This study explores the **genetic diversity of African populations**, analyzing their role in **human evolution and complex disease research**. The findings highlight **Africa’s unique genetic landscape**, confirming it as the most genetically diverse continent. The research provides valuable insights into **how genetic variation influences disease susceptibility, evolution, and population structure**.##
307 307  
452 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
308 308  
309 -Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
310 -**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
311 -**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
312 -**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
313 -**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
314 -**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
315 -**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection*
454 +----
316 316  
317 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
456 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
457 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1038_nrg865MODERN.pdf]]##
458 +{{/expand}}
459 +
460 +
461 +== Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA ==
462 +
463 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Pervasive Findings of Directional Selection in Ancient DNA"}}
464 +**Source:** *bioRxiv Preprint*
465 +**Date of Publication:** *September 15, 2024*
466 +**Author(s):** *Ali Akbari, Alison R. Barton, Steven Gazal, Zheng Li, Mohammadreza Kariminejad, et al.*
467 +**Title:** *"Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation"*
468 +**DOI:** [10.1101/2024.09.14.613021](https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021)
469 +**Subject Matter:** *Genomics, Evolutionary Biology, Natural Selection* 
470 +
471 +----
472 +
473 +## **Key Statistics**##
474 +
318 318  1. **General Observations:**
319 319   - Study analyzes **8,433 ancient individuals** from the past **14,000 years**.
320 320   - Identifies **347 genome-wide significant loci** showing strong selection.
... ... @@ -326,9 +326,11 @@
326 326  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
327 327   - **10,000 years of directional selection** affected metabolic, immune, and cognitive traits.
328 328   - **Strong selection signals** found for traits like **skin pigmentation, cognitive function, and immunity**.
329 -{{/expandable}}
330 330  
331 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
487 +----
488 +
489 +## **Findings**##
490 +
332 332  1. **Primary Observations:**
333 333   - **Hundreds of alleles have been subject to directional selection** over recent millennia.
334 334   - Traits like **immune function, metabolism, and cognitive performance** show strong selection.
... ... @@ -341,9 +341,11 @@
341 341   - **Celiac disease risk allele** increased from **0% to 20%** in 4,000 years.
342 342   - **Blood type B frequency rose from 0% to 8% in 6,000 years**.
343 343   - **Tuberculosis risk allele** fluctuated from **2% to 9% over 3,000 years before declining**.
344 -{{/expandable}}
345 345  
346 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
504 +----
505 +
506 +## **Critique and Observations**##
507 +
347 347  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
348 348   - **Largest dataset to date** on natural selection in human ancient DNA.
349 349   - Uses **direct allele frequency tracking instead of indirect measures**.
... ... @@ -355,34 +355,48 @@
355 355  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
356 356   - Expanding research to **other global populations** to assess universal trends.
357 357   - Investigating **long-term evolutionary trade-offs of selected alleles**.
358 -{{/expandable}}
359 359  
360 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
520 +----
521 +
522 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
361 361  - Provides **direct evidence of long-term genetic adaptation** in human populations.
362 362  - Supports theories on **polygenic selection shaping human cognition, metabolism, and immunity**.
363 -- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.
364 -{{/expandable}}
525 +- Highlights **how past selection pressures may still influence modern health and disease prevalence**.##
365 365  
366 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
527 +----
528 +
529 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
530 +
367 367  1. Examine **selection patterns in non-European populations** for comparison.
368 368  2. Investigate **how environmental and cultural shifts influenced genetic selection**.
369 369  3. Explore **the genetic basis of traits linked to past and present-day human survival**.
370 -{{/expandable}}
371 371  
372 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
373 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]
374 -{{/expandable}}
375 -{{/expandable}}
535 +----
376 376  
377 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
378 -**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
379 -**Date of Publication:** *2013*
380 -**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
381 -**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
382 -**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
383 -**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology*
537 +## **Summary of Research Study**
538 +This study examines **how human genetic adaptation has unfolded over 14,000 years**, using a **large dataset of ancient DNA**. It highlights **strong selection on immune function, metabolism, and cognitive traits**, revealing **hundreds of loci affected by directional selection**. The findings emphasize **the power of ancient DNA in tracking human evolution and adaptation**.##
384 384  
385 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
540 +----
541 +
542 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
543 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1101_2024.09.14.613021doi_.pdf]]##
544 +{{/expand}}
545 +
546 +
547 +== Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age ==
548 +
549 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"}}
550 +**Source:** *Twin Research and Human Genetics (Cambridge University Press)*
551 +**Date of Publication:** *2013*
552 +**Author(s):** *Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.*
553 +**Title:** *"The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age"*
554 +**DOI:** [10.1017/thg.2013.54](https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.54)
555 +**Subject Matter:** *Intelligence, Heritability, Developmental Psychology* 
556 +
557 +----
558 +
559 +## **Key Statistics**##
560 +
386 386  1. **General Observations:**
387 387   - The study documents how the **heritability of IQ increases with age**, reaching an asymptote at **0.80 by adulthood**.
388 388   - Analysis is based on **longitudinal twin and adoption studies**.
... ... @@ -394,9 +394,11 @@
394 394  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
395 395   - Data from the **Louisville Longitudinal Twin Study and cross-national twin samples** support findings.
396 396   - IQ stability over time is **influenced more by genetics than by shared environmental factors**.
397 -{{/expandable}}
398 398  
399 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
573 +----
574 +
575 +## **Findings**##
576 +
400 400  1. **Primary Observations:**
401 401   - Intelligence heritability **strengthens throughout development**, contrary to early environmental models.
402 402   - Shared environmental effects **decrease by late adolescence**, emphasizing **genetic influence in adulthood**.
... ... @@ -408,9 +408,11 @@
408 408  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
409 409   - Longitudinal adoption studies show **declining impact of adoptive parental influence on IQ** as children age.
410 410   - Cross-sectional twin data confirm **higher IQ correlations for monozygotic twins in adulthood**.
411 -{{/expandable}}
412 412  
413 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
589 +----
590 +
591 +## **Critique and Observations**##
592 +
414 414  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
415 415   - **Robust dataset covering multiple twin and adoption studies over decades**.
416 416   - **Clear, replicable trend** demonstrating the increasing role of genetics in intelligence.
... ... @@ -422,34 +422,50 @@
422 422  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
423 423   - Future research should investigate **gene-environment interactions in cognitive aging**.
424 424   - Examine **heritability trends in non-Western populations** to determine cross-cultural consistency.
425 -{{/expandable}}
426 426  
427 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
605 +----
606 +
607 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
428 428  - Provides **strong evidence for the genetic basis of intelligence**.
429 429  - Highlights the **diminishing role of shared environment in cognitive development**.
430 -- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.
431 -{{/expandable}}
610 +- Supports research on **cognitive aging and heritability across the lifespan**.##
432 432  
433 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
612 +----
613 +
614 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
615 +
434 434  1. Investigate **neurogenetic pathways underlying IQ development**.
435 435  2. Examine **how education and socioeconomic factors interact with genetic IQ influences**.
436 436  3. Study **heritability trends in aging populations and cognitive decline**.
437 -{{/expandable}}
438 438  
439 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
440 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]
441 -{{/expandable}}
442 -{{/expandable}}
620 +----
443 443  
444 -{{expandable summary="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
445 -**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
446 -**Date of Publication:** *2010*
447 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
448 -**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
449 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
450 -**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology*
622 +## **Summary of Research Study**
623 +This study documents **The Wilson Effect**, demonstrating how the **heritability of IQ increases throughout development**, reaching a plateau of **0.80 by adulthood**. The findings indicate that **shared environmental effects diminish with age**, while **genetic influences on intelligence strengthen**. Using **longitudinal twin and adoption data**, the research provides **strong empirical support for the increasing role of genetics in cognitive ability over time**.##
451 451  
452 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
625 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
626 +
627 +----
628 +
629 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
630 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1017_thg.2013.54.pdf]]##
631 +{{/expand}}
632 +
633 +
634 +== Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications ==
635 +
636 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"}}
637 +**Source:** *Medical Hypotheses (Elsevier)*
638 +**Date of Publication:** *2010*
639 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley*
640 +**Title:** *"Is Homo sapiens polytypic? Human taxonomic diversity and its implications"*
641 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2009.07.046)
642 +**Subject Matter:** *Human Taxonomy, Evolutionary Biology, Anthropology* 
643 +
644 +----
645 +
646 +## **Key Statistics**##
647 +
453 453  1. **General Observations:**
454 454   - The study argues that **Homo sapiens is polytypic**, meaning it consists of multiple subspecies rather than a single monotypic species.
455 455   - Examines **genetic diversity, morphological variation, and evolutionary lineage** in humans.
... ... @@ -461,9 +461,11 @@
461 461  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
462 462   - The study evaluates **FST values (genetic differentiation measure)** and argues that human genetic differentiation is comparable to that of recognized subspecies in other species.
463 463   - Considers **phylogenetic species concepts** in defining human variation.
464 -{{/expandable}}
465 465  
466 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
660 +----
661 +
662 +## **Findings**##
663 +
467 467  1. **Primary Observations:**
468 468   - Proposes that **modern human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**.
469 469   - Highlights **medical and evolutionary implications** of human taxonomic diversity.
... ... @@ -475,9 +475,11 @@
475 475  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
476 476   - Evaluates how **genetic markers correlate with population structure**.
477 477   - Addresses the **controversy over race classification in modern anthropology**.
478 -{{/expandable}}
479 479  
480 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
676 +----
677 +
678 +## **Critique and Observations**##
679 +
481 481  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
482 482   - Uses **comparative species analysis** to assess human classification.
483 483   - Provides a **biological perspective** on the race concept, moving beyond social constructivism arguments.
... ... @@ -489,36 +489,50 @@
489 489  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
490 490   - Further research should **incorporate whole-genome studies** to refine subspecies classifications.
491 491   - Investigate **how admixture affects taxonomic classification over time**.
492 -{{/expandable}}
493 493  
494 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
692 +----
693 +
694 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
495 495  - Contributes to discussions on **evolutionary taxonomy and species classification**.
496 496  - Provides evidence on **genetic differentiation among human populations**.
497 -- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.
498 -{{/expandable}}
697 +- Highlights **historical and contemporary scientific debates on race and human variation**.##
499 499  
500 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
699 +----
700 +
701 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
702 +
501 501  1. Examine **FST values in modern and ancient human populations**.
502 502  2. Investigate how **adaptive evolution influences population differentiation**.
503 503  3. Explore **the impact of genetic diversity on medical treatments and disease susceptibility**.
504 -{{/expandable}}
505 505  
506 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
507 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]
508 -{{/expandable}}
509 -{{/expandable}}
707 +----
510 510  
511 -= IQ =
709 +## **Summary of Research Study**
710 +This study evaluates **whether Homo sapiens should be classified as a polytypic species**, analyzing **genetic diversity, evolutionary lineage, and morphological variation**. Using comparative analysis with other primates and mammals, the research suggests that **human populations meet biological criteria for subspecies classification**, with implications for **evolutionary biology, anthropology, and medicine**.##
512 512  
513 -{{expandable summary="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
514 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
515 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
516 -**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
517 -**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
518 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
519 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis*
712 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
520 520  
521 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
714 +----
715 +
716 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
717 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.mehy.2009.07.046.pdf]]##
718 +{{/expand}}
719 +
720 +
721 +== Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media ==
722 +
723 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"}}
724 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
725 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
726 +**Author(s):** *Heiner Rindermann, David Becker, Thomas R. Coyle*
727 +**Title:** *"Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence: Intelligence Research, Experts' Background, Controversial Issues, and the Media"*
728 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2019.101406)
729 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Intelligence Research, Expert Analysis* 
730 +
731 +----
732 +
733 +## **Key Statistics**##
734 +
522 522  1. **General Observations:**
523 523   - Survey of **102 experts** on intelligence research and public discourse.
524 524   - Evaluated experts' backgrounds, political affiliations, and views on controversial topics in intelligence research.
... ... @@ -530,9 +530,11 @@
530 530  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
531 531   - Experts rated media coverage of intelligence research as **poor (avg. 3.1 on a 9-point scale)**.
532 532   - **50% of experts attributed US Black-White IQ differences to genetic factors, 50% to environmental factors**.
533 -{{/expandable}}
534 534  
535 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
747 +----
748 +
749 +## **Findings**##
750 +
536 536  1. **Primary Observations:**
537 537   - Experts overwhelmingly support **the g-factor theory of intelligence**.
538 538   - **Heritability of intelligence** was widely accepted, though views differed on race and group differences.
... ... @@ -544,9 +544,11 @@
544 544  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
545 545   - The study compared **media coverage of intelligence research** with expert opinions.
546 546   - Found a **disconnect between journalists and intelligence researchers**, especially regarding politically sensitive issues.
547 -{{/expandable}}
548 548  
549 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
763 +----
764 +
765 +## **Critique and Observations**##
766 +
550 550  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
551 551   - **Largest expert survey on intelligence research** to date.
552 552   - Provides insight into **how political orientation influences scientific perspectives**.
... ... @@ -558,34 +558,50 @@
558 558  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
559 559   - Future studies should include **a broader range of global experts**.
560 560   - Additional research needed on **media biases and misrepresentation of intelligence research**.
561 -{{/expandable}}
562 562  
563 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
779 +----
780 +
781 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
564 564  - Provides insight into **expert consensus and division on intelligence research**.
565 565  - Highlights the **role of media bias** in shaping public perception of intelligence science.
566 -- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.
567 -{{/expandable}}
784 +- Useful for understanding **the intersection of science, politics, and public discourse** on intelligence research.##
568 568  
569 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
786 +----
787 +
788 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
789 +
570 570  1. Examine **cross-national differences** in expert opinions on intelligence.
571 571  2. Investigate how **media bias impacts public understanding of intelligence research**.
572 572  3. Conduct follow-up studies with **a more diverse expert pool** to test findings.
573 -{{/expandable}}
574 574  
575 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
576 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]
577 -{{/expandable}}
578 -{{/expandable}}
794 +----
579 579  
580 -{{expandable summary="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
581 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
582 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
583 -**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
584 -**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
585 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
586 -**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences*
796 +## **Summary of Research Study**
797 +This study surveys **expert opinions on intelligence research**, analyzing **how backgrounds, political ideologies, and media representation influence perspectives on intelligence**. The findings highlight **divisions in scientific consensus**, particularly on **genetic vs. environmental causes of IQ disparities**. Additionally, the research uncovers **widespread dissatisfaction with media portrayals of intelligence research**, pointing to **the impact of ideological biases on public discourse**.##
587 587  
588 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
799 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
800 +
801 +----
802 +
803 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
804 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2019.101406.pdf]]##
805 +{{/expand}}
806 +
807 +
808 +== Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation ==
809 +
810 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"}}
811 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
812 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
813 +**Author(s):** *Davide Piffer*
814 +**Title:** *"A Review of Intelligence GWAS Hits: Their Relationship to Country IQ and the Issue of Spatial Autocorrelation"*
815 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.08.008)
816 +**Subject Matter:** *Genetics, Intelligence, GWAS, Population Differences* 
817 +
818 +----
819 +
820 +## **Key Statistics**##
821 +
589 589  1. **General Observations:**
590 590   - Study analyzed **genome-wide association studies (GWAS) hits** linked to intelligence.
591 591   - Found a **strong correlation (r = .91) between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**.
... ... @@ -597,9 +597,11 @@
597 597  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
598 598   - GWAS intelligence SNPs predicted **IQ levels more strongly than random genetic markers**.
599 599   - Genetic differentiation (Fst values) showed that **selection pressure, rather than drift, influenced intelligence-related allele distributions**.
600 -{{/expandable}}
601 601  
602 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
834 +----
835 +
836 +## **Findings**##
837 +
603 603  1. **Primary Observations:**
604 604   - Intelligence-associated SNP frequencies correlate **highly with national IQ levels**.
605 605   - Genetic selection for intelligence appears **stronger than selection for height-related genes**.
... ... @@ -611,9 +611,11 @@
611 611  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
612 612   - Polygenic scores using **intelligence-related alleles significantly outperformed random SNPs** in predicting IQ.
613 613   - Selection pressures **may explain differences in global intelligence distribution** beyond genetic drift effects.
614 -{{/expandable}}
615 615  
616 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
850 +----
851 +
852 +## **Critique and Observations**##
853 +
617 617  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
618 618   - **Comprehensive genetic analysis** of intelligence-linked SNPs.
619 619   - Uses **multiple statistical methods (factor analysis, Fst analysis) to confirm results**.
... ... @@ -625,37 +625,78 @@
625 625  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
626 626   - Larger **cross-population GWAS studies** needed to validate findings.
627 627   - Investigate **non-genetic contributors to IQ variance** in addition to genetic factors.
628 -{{/expandable}}
629 629  
630 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
866 +----
867 +
868 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
631 631  - Supports research on **genetic influences on intelligence at a population level**.
632 632  - Aligns with broader discussions on **cognitive genetics and natural selection effects**.
633 -- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.
634 -{{/expandable}}
871 +- Provides a **quantitative framework for analyzing polygenic selection in intelligence studies**.##
635 635  
636 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
873 +----
874 +
875 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
876 +
637 637  1. Conduct **expanded GWAS studies** including diverse populations.
638 638  2. Investigate **gene-environment interactions influencing intelligence**.
639 639  3. Explore **historical selection pressures shaping intelligence-related alleles**.
640 -{{/expandable}}
641 641  
642 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
643 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]
644 -{{/expandable}}
645 -{{/expandable}}
881 +----
646 646  
647 -{{expandable summary="Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding"}}
648 -**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
649 -**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
650 -**Author(s):** Smith et al.
651 -**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
652 -**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
653 -**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science
654 -{{/expandable}}
883 +## **Summary of Research Study**
884 +This study reviews **genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings on intelligence**, demonstrating a **strong correlation between polygenic intelligence scores and national IQ levels**. The research highlights how **genetic selection may explain population-level cognitive differences beyond genetic drift effects**. Intelligence-linked alleles showed **higher variability across populations than height-related alleles**, suggesting stronger selection pressures.  ##
655 655  
656 -= Dating =
886 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
657 657  
658 -{{expandable summary="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
888 +----
889 +
890 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
891 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2015.08.008.pdf]]##
892 +{{/expand}}
893 +
894 +
895 +== Study: Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding ==
896 +
897 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Click here to expand details"}}
898 +**Source:** Journal of Genetic Epidemiology
899 +**Date of Publication:** 2024-01-15
900 +**Author(s):** Smith et al.
901 +**Title:** "Genetic Structure, Self-Identified Race/Ethnicity, and Confounding in Case-Control Association Studies"
902 +**DOI:** [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235](https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235)
903 +**Subject Matter:** Genetics, Social Science 
904 +
905 +**Tags:** `Genetics` `Race & Ethnicity` `Biomedical Research`
906 +
907 + **Key Statistics**
908 +
909 +1. **General Observations:**
910 + - A near-perfect alignment between self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry was observed.
911 + - Misclassification rate: **0.14%**.
912 +
913 +2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
914 + - Four groups analyzed: **White, African American, East Asian, and Hispanic**.
915 + - Hispanic genetic clusters showed significant European and Native American lineage.
916 +
917 + **Findings**
918 +
919 +- Self-identified race strongly aligns with genetic ancestry.
920 +- Minor discrepancies exist but do not significantly impact classification.
921 +
922 + **Relevance to Subproject**
923 +
924 +- Reinforces the reliability of **self-reported racial identity** in genetic research.
925 +- Highlights **policy considerations** in biomedical studies.
926 +{{/expand}}
927 +
928 +
929 +----
930 +
931 += Dating and Interpersonal Relationships =
932 +
933 +
934 +== Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018 ==
935 +
936 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018"}}
659 659  **Source:** *JAMA Network Open*
660 660  **Date of Publication:** *2020*
661 661  **Author(s):** *Ueda P, Mercer CH, Ghaznavi C, Herbenick D.*
... ... @@ -663,7 +663,10 @@
663 663  **DOI:** [10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833](https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3833)
664 664  **Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Sexual Behavior, Demography* 
665 665  
666 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
944 +----
945 +
946 +## **Key Statistics**##
947 +
667 667  1. **General Observations:**
668 668   - Study analyzed **General Social Survey (2000-2018)** data.
669 669   - Found **declining trends in sexual activity** among young adults.
... ... @@ -675,9 +675,11 @@
675 675  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
676 676   - Frequency of sexual activity decreased by **8-10%** over the studied period.
677 677   - Number of sexual partners remained **relatively stable** despite declining activity rates.
678 -{{/expandable}}
679 679  
680 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
960 +----
961 +
962 +## **Findings**##
963 +
681 681  1. **Primary Observations:**
682 682   - A significant decline in sexual frequency, especially among **younger men**.
683 683   - Shifts in relationship dynamics and economic stressors may contribute to the trend.
... ... @@ -689,9 +689,11 @@
689 689  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
690 690   - **Mental health and employment status** were correlated with decreased activity.
691 691   - Social factors such as **screen time and digital entertainment consumption** are potential contributors.
692 -{{/expandable}}
693 693  
694 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
976 +----
977 +
978 +## **Critique and Observations**##
979 +
695 695  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
696 696   - **Large sample size** from a nationally representative dataset.
697 697   - **Longitudinal design** enables trend analysis over time.
... ... @@ -703,31 +703,55 @@
703 703  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
704 704   - Further studies should incorporate **qualitative data** on behavioral shifts.
705 705   - Additional factors such as **economic shifts and social media usage** need exploration.
706 -{{/expandable}}
707 707  
708 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
992 +----
993 +
994 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
709 709  - Provides evidence on **changing demographic behaviors** in relation to relationships and social interactions.
710 -- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.
711 -{{/expandable}}
996 +- Highlights the role of **mental health, employment, and societal changes** in personal behaviors.##
712 712  
713 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
998 +----
999 +
1000 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1001 +
714 714  1. Investigate the **impact of digital media consumption** on relationship dynamics.
715 715  2. Examine **regional and cultural differences** in sexual activity trends.
716 -{{/expandable}}
717 717  
718 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
719 -{{/expandable}}
720 -{{/expandable}}
1005 +----
721 721  
722 -{{expandable summary="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
723 -**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
724 -**Date of Publication:** *2012*
725 -**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
726 -**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
727 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
728 -**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities*
1007 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1008 +This study examines **trends in sexual frequency and number of partners among U.S. adults (2000-2018)**, highlighting significant **declines in sexual activity, particularly among young men**. The research utilized **General Social Survey data** to analyze the impact of **sociodemographic factors, employment status, and mental well-being** on sexual behavior.  ##
729 729  
730 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1010 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study's contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1011 +
1012 +----
1013 +
1014 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1015 +{{velocity}}
1016 +#set($doi = "10.1001_jamanetworkopen.2020.3833")
1017 +#set($filename = "${doi}.pdf")
1018 +#if($xwiki.exists("attach:$filename"))
1019 +[[Download>>attach:$filename]]
1020 +#else
1021 +{{html}}<span style="color: red; font-weight: bold;">🚨 PDF Not Available 🚨</span>{{/html}}
1022 +#end {{/velocity}}##
1023 +{{/expand}}
1024 +
1025 +
1026 +== Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ==
1027 +
1028 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"}}
1029 +**Source:** *Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica*
1030 +**Date of Publication:** *2012*
1031 +**Author(s):** *Ravisha M. Srinivasjois, Shreya Shah, Prakesh S. Shah, Knowledge Synthesis Group on Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births*
1032 +**Title:** *"Biracial Couples and Adverse Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"*
1033 +**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01501.x)
1034 +**Subject Matter:** *Neonatal Health, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Racial Disparities* 
1035 +
1036 +----
1037 +
1038 +## **Key Statistics**##
1039 +
731 731  1. **General Observations:**
732 732   - Meta-analysis of **26,335,596 singleton births** from eight studies.
733 733   - **Higher risk of adverse birth outcomes in biracial couples** than White couples, but lower than Black couples.
... ... @@ -741,9 +741,11 @@
741 741   - **Low birthweight (LBW):** WMBF (1.21), BMWF (1.75), Black mother–Black father (BMBF) (2.08).
742 742   - **Preterm births (PTB):** WMBF (1.17), BMWF (1.37), BMBF (1.78).
743 743   - **Stillbirths:** WMBF (1.43), BMWF (1.51), BMBF (1.85).
744 -{{/expandable}}
745 745  
746 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1054 +----
1055 +
1056 +## **Findings**##
1057 +
747 747  1. **Primary Observations:**
748 748   - **Biracial couples face a gradient of risk**: higher than White couples but lower than Black couples.
749 749   - **Maternal race plays a more significant role** in pregnancy outcomes.
... ... @@ -755,9 +755,11 @@
755 755  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
756 756   - The **weathering hypothesis** suggests that **long-term stress exposure** contributes to higher adverse birth risks in Black mothers.
757 757   - **Genetic and environmental factors** may interact to influence birth outcomes.
758 -{{/expandable}}
759 759  
760 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1070 +----
1071 +
1072 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1073 +
761 761  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
762 762   - **Largest meta-analysis** on racial disparities in birth outcomes.
763 763   - Uses **adjusted statistical models** to account for confounding variables.
... ... @@ -769,34 +769,48 @@
769 769  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
770 770   - Future studies should examine **Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous biracial couples**.
771 771   - Investigate **long-term health effects on infants from biracial pregnancies**.
772 -{{/expandable}}
773 773  
774 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1086 +----
1087 +
1088 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
775 775  - Provides **critical insights into racial disparities** in maternal and infant health.
776 776  - Supports **research on genetic and environmental influences on neonatal health**.
777 -- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.
778 -{{/expandable}}
1091 +- Highlights **how maternal race plays a more significant role than paternal race** in birth outcomes.##
779 779  
780 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1093 +----
1094 +
1095 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1096 +
781 781  1. Investigate **the role of prenatal care quality in mitigating racial disparities**.
782 782  2. Examine **how social determinants of health impact biracial pregnancy outcomes**.
783 783  3. Explore **gene-environment interactions influencing birthweight and prematurity risks**.
784 -{{/expandable}}
785 785  
786 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
787 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]
788 -{{/expandable}}
789 -{{/expandable}}
1101 +----
790 790  
791 -{{expandable summary="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
792 -**Source:** *Current Psychology*
793 -**Date of Publication:** *2024*
794 -**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
795 -**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
796 -**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
797 -**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation*
1103 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1104 +This meta-analysis examines **the impact of biracial parentage on birth outcomes**, showing that **biracial couples face a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White couples but lower than Black couples**. The findings emphasize **maternal race as a key factor in birth risks**, with **Black mothers having the highest rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, regardless of paternal race**.##
798 798  
799 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1106 +----
1107 +
1108 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1109 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1600-0412.2012.01501.xAbstract.pdf]]##
1110 +{{/expand}}
1111 +
1112 +
1113 +== Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness ==
1114 +
1115 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"}}
1116 +**Source:** *Current Psychology*
1117 +**Date of Publication:** *2024*
1118 +**Author(s):** *Brandon Sparks, Alexandra M. Zidenberg, Mark E. Olver*
1119 +**Title:** *"One is the Loneliest Number: Involuntary Celibacy (Incel), Mental Health, and Loneliness"*
1120 +**DOI:** [10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04275-z)
1121 +**Subject Matter:** *Psychology, Mental Health, Social Isolation* 
1122 +
1123 +----
1124 +
1125 +## **Key Statistics**##
1126 +
800 800  1. **General Observations:**
801 801   - Study analyzed **67 self-identified incels** and **103 non-incel men**.
802 802   - Incels reported **higher loneliness and lower social support** compared to non-incels.
... ... @@ -808,9 +808,11 @@
808 808  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
809 809   - 95% of incels in the study reported **having depression**, with 38% receiving a formal diagnosis.
810 810   - **Higher externalization of blame** was linked to stronger incel identification.
811 -{{/expandable}}
812 812  
813 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1139 +----
1140 +
1141 +## **Findings**##
1142 +
814 814  1. **Primary Observations:**
815 815   - Incels experience **heightened rejection sensitivity and loneliness**.
816 816   - Lack of social support correlates with **worse mental health outcomes**.
... ... @@ -822,9 +822,11 @@
822 822  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
823 823   - Incels **engaged in fewer positive coping mechanisms** such as emotional support or positive reframing.
824 824   - Instead, they relied on **solitary coping strategies**, worsening their isolation.
825 -{{/expandable}}
826 826  
827 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1155 +----
1156 +
1157 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1158 +
828 828  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
829 829   - **First quantitative study** on incels’ social isolation and mental health.
830 830   - **Robust sample size** and validated psychological measures.
... ... @@ -836,36 +836,53 @@
836 836  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
837 837   - Future studies should **compare incel forum users vs. non-users**.
838 838   - Investigate **potential intervention strategies** for social integration.
839 -{{/expandable}}
840 840  
841 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1171 +----
1172 +
1173 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
842 842  - Highlights **mental health vulnerabilities** within the incel community.
843 843  - Supports research on **loneliness, attachment styles, and social dominance orientation**.
844 -- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.
845 -{{/expandable}}
1176 +- Examines how **peer rejection influences self-perceived mate value**.##
846 846  
847 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1178 +----
1179 +
1180 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1181 +
848 848  1. Explore how **online community participation** affects incel mental health.
849 849  2. Investigate **cognitive biases** influencing self-perceived rejection among incels.
850 850  3. Assess **therapeutic interventions** to address incel social isolation.
851 -{{/expandable}}
852 852  
853 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
854 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]
855 -{{/expandable}}
856 -{{/expandable}}
1186 +----
857 857  
1188 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1189 +This study examines the **psychological characteristics of self-identified incels**, comparing them with non-incel men in terms of **mental health, loneliness, and coping strategies**. The research found **higher depression, anxiety, and avoidant attachment styles among incels**, as well as **greater reliance on solitary coping mechanisms**. It suggests that **lack of social support plays a critical role in exacerbating incel identity and related mental health concerns**.##
1190 +
1191 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1192 +
1193 +----
1194 +
1195 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1196 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1007_s12144-023-04275-z.pdf]]##
1197 +{{/expand}}
1198 +
1199 +
858 858  = Crime and Substance Abuse =
859 859  
860 -{{expandable summary="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
861 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
862 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
863 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
864 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
865 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
866 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
867 867  
868 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1203 +== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1204 +
1205 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1206 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1207 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1208 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1209 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1210 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1211 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1212 +
1213 +----
1214 +
1215 +## **Key Statistics**##
1216 +
869 869  1. **General Observations:**
870 870   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
871 871   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -877,9 +877,11 @@
877 877  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
878 878   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
879 879   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
880 -{{/expandable}}
881 881  
882 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1229 +----
1230 +
1231 +## **Findings**##
1232 +
883 883  1. **Primary Observations:**
884 884   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
885 885   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -891,9 +891,11 @@
891 891  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
892 892   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
893 893   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
894 -{{/expandable}}
895 895  
896 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1245 +----
1246 +
1247 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1248 +
897 897  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
898 898   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
899 899   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -905,34 +905,50 @@
905 905  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
906 906   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
907 907   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
908 -{{/expandable}}
909 909  
910 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1261 +----
1262 +
1263 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
911 911  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
912 912  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
913 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
914 -{{/expandable}}
1266 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
915 915  
916 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1268 +----
1269 +
1270 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1271 +
917 917  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
918 918  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
919 919  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
920 -{{/expandable}}
921 921  
922 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
923 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
924 -{{/expandable}}
925 -{{/expandable}}
1276 +----
926 926  
927 -{{expandable summary="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
928 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
929 -**Date of Publication:** *2003*
930 -**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
931 -**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
932 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
933 -**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research*
1278 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1279 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
934 934  
935 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1281 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1282 +
1283 +----
1284 +
1285 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1286 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1287 +{{/expand}}
1288 +
1289 +
1290 +== Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys ==
1291 +
1292 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"}}
1293 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1294 +**Date of Publication:** *2003*
1295 +**Author(s):** *Timothy P. Johnson, Phillip J. Bowman*
1296 +**Title:** *"Cross-Cultural Sources of Measurement Error in Substance Use Surveys"*
1297 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120023394](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120023394)
1298 +**Subject Matter:** *Survey Methodology, Racial Disparities, Substance Use Research* 
1299 +
1300 +----
1301 +
1302 +## **Key Statistics**##
1303 +
936 936  1. **General Observations:**
937 937   - Study examined **how racial and cultural factors influence self-reported substance use data**.
938 938   - Analyzed **36 empirical studies from 1977–2003** on survey reliability across racial/ethnic groups.
... ... @@ -944,62 +944,82 @@
944 944  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
945 945   - **Surveys using biological validation (urinalysis, hair tests) revealed underreporting trends**.
946 946   - **Higher recantation rates** (denying past drug use) were observed among minority respondents.
947 -{{/expandable}}
948 948  
949 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1316 +----
1317 +
1318 +## **Findings**##
1319 +
950 950  1. **Primary Observations:**
951 951   - Racial/ethnic disparities in **substance use reporting bias survey-based research**.
952 952   - **Social desirability and cultural norms impact data reliability**.
953 953  
954 -2. **Subgroup Trends:**
1324 +2. **Subgroup Trends:**
955 955   - White respondents were **more likely to overreport** substance use.
956 956   - Black and Latino respondents **had higher recantation rates**, particularly in face-to-face interviews.
957 957  
958 -3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1328 +3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
959 959   - Mode of survey administration **significantly influenced reporting accuracy**.
960 960   - **Self-administered surveys produced more reliable data than interviewer-administered surveys**.
961 -{{/expandable}}
962 962  
963 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
964 -1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1332 +----
1333 +
1334 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1335 +
1336 +1. **Strengths of the Study:**
965 965   - **Comprehensive review of 36 studies** on measurement error in substance use reporting.
966 966   - Identifies **systemic biases affecting racial/ethnic survey reliability**.
967 967  
968 -2. **Limitations of the Study:**
1340 +2. **Limitations of the Study:**
969 969   - Relies on **secondary data analysis**, limiting direct experimental control.
970 970   - Does not explore **how measurement error impacts policy decisions**.
971 971  
972 -3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1344 +3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
973 973   - Future research should **incorporate mixed-method approaches** (qualitative & quantitative).
974 974   - Investigate **how survey design can reduce racial reporting disparities**.
975 -{{/expandable}}
976 976  
977 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1348 +----
1349 +
1350 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
978 978  - Supports research on **racial disparities in self-reported health behaviors**.
979 979  - Highlights **survey methodology issues that impact substance use epidemiology**.
980 -- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.
981 -{{/expandable}}
1353 +- Provides insights for **improving data accuracy in public health research**.##
982 982  
983 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1355 +----
1356 +
1357 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1358 +
984 984  1. Investigate **how survey design impacts racial disparities in self-reported health data**.
985 985  2. Study **alternative data collection methods (biometric validation, passive data tracking)**.
986 986  3. Explore **the role of social stigma in self-reported health behaviors**.
987 -{{/expandable}}
988 988  
989 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
990 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]
991 -{{/expandable}}
992 -{{/expandable}}
1363 +----
993 993  
994 -{{expandable summary="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
995 -**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
996 -**Date of Publication:** *2002*
997 -**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
998 -**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
999 -**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1000 -**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts*
1365 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1366 +This study examines **cross-cultural biases in self-reported substance use surveys**, showing that **racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to underreport drug use** due to **social stigma, research distrust, and survey administration methods**. The findings highlight **critical issues in public health data collection and the need for improved survey design**.##
1001 1001  
1002 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1368 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1369 +
1370 +----
1371 +
1372 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1373 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120023394.pdf]]##
1374 +{{/expand}}
1375 +
1376 +
1377 +== Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program ==
1378 +
1379 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"}}
1380 +**Source:** *Substance Use & Misuse*
1381 +**Date of Publication:** *2002*
1382 +**Author(s):** *Clifford A. Butzin, Christine A. Saum, Frank R. Scarpitti*
1383 +**Title:** *"Factors Associated with Completion of a Drug Treatment Court Diversion Program"*
1384 +**DOI:** [10.1081/JA-120014424](https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120014424)
1385 +**Subject Matter:** *Substance Use, Criminal Justice, Drug Courts* 
1386 +
1387 +----
1388 +
1389 +## **Key Statistics**##
1390 +
1003 1003  1. **General Observations:**
1004 1004   - Study examined **drug treatment court success rates** among first-time offenders.
1005 1005   - Strongest predictors of **successful completion were employment status and race**.
... ... @@ -1011,9 +1011,11 @@
1011 1011  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1012 1012   - **Education level was positively correlated** with program completion.
1013 1013   - Frequency of **drug use before enrollment affected treatment outcomes**.
1014 -{{/expandable}}
1015 1015  
1016 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1403 +----
1404 +
1405 +## **Findings**##
1406 +
1017 1017  1. **Primary Observations:**
1018 1018   - **Social stability factors** (employment, education) were key to treatment success.
1019 1019   - **Race and pre-existing substance use patterns** influenced completion rates.
... ... @@ -1025,9 +1025,11 @@
1025 1025  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1026 1026   - **Individuals with strong social ties were more likely to finish the program**.
1027 1027   - Success rates were **significantly higher for participants with case management support**.
1028 -{{/expandable}}
1029 1029  
1030 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1419 +----
1420 +
1421 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1422 +
1031 1031  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1032 1032   - **First empirical study on drug court program success factors**.
1033 1033   - Uses **longitudinal data** for post-treatment analysis.
... ... @@ -1039,35 +1039,117 @@
1039 1039  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1040 1040   - Future research should examine **racial disparities in drug court outcomes**.
1041 1041   - Study **how community resources impact long-term recovery**.
1042 -{{/expandable}}
1043 1043  
1044 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1435 +----
1436 +
1437 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1045 1045  - Provides insight into **what factors contribute to drug court program success**.
1046 1046  - Highlights **racial disparities in criminal justice-based rehabilitation programs**.
1047 -- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.
1048 -{{/expandable}}
1440 +- Supports **policy discussions on improving access to drug treatment for marginalized groups**.##
1049 1049  
1050 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1442 +----
1443 +
1444 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1445 +
1051 1051  1. Investigate **the role of mental health in drug court success rates**.
1052 1052  2. Assess **long-term relapse prevention strategies post-treatment**.
1053 1053  3. Explore **alternative diversion programs beyond traditional drug courts**.
1054 -{{/expandable}}
1055 1055  
1056 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1057 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]
1058 -{{/expandable}}
1059 -{{/expandable}}
1450 +----
1060 1060  
1452 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1453 +This study examines **factors influencing the completion of drug treatment court programs**, identifying **employment, education, and race as key predictors**. The research underscores **systemic disparities in drug court outcomes**, emphasizing the need for **improved support systems for at-risk populations**.##
1061 1061  
1062 -{{expandable summary="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1063 -**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1064 -**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1065 -**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1066 -**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1067 -**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1068 -**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics*
1455 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1069 1069  
1070 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1457 +----
1458 +
1459 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1460 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1081_JA-120014424.pdf]]##
1461 +{{/expand}}
1462 +
1463 +
1464 +== Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults ==
1465 +
1466 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"}}
1467 + Source: Addictive Behaviors
1468 +Date of Publication: 2016
1469 +Author(s): Andrea Hussong, Christy Capron, Gregory T. Smith, Jennifer L. Maggs
1470 +Title: "Associations Between Cannabis Use and Mental Health Symptoms in Young Adults"
1471 +DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030
1472 +Subject Matter: Substance Use, Mental Health, Adolescent Development
1473 +
1474 +Key Statistics
1475 +General Observations:
1476 +
1477 +Study examined cannabis use trends in young adults over time.
1478 +Found significant correlations between cannabis use and increased depressive symptoms.
1479 +Subgroup Analysis:
1480 +
1481 +Males exhibited higher rates of cannabis use, but females reported stronger mental health impacts.
1482 +Individuals with pre-existing anxiety disorders were more likely to report problematic cannabis use.
1483 +Other Significant Data Points:
1484 +
1485 +Frequent cannabis users showed a 23% higher likelihood of developing anxiety symptoms.
1486 +Co-occurring substance use (e.g., alcohol) exacerbated negative psychological effects.
1487 +Findings
1488 +Primary Observations:
1489 +
1490 +Cannabis use was linked to higher depressive and anxiety symptoms, particularly in frequent users.
1491 +Self-medication patterns emerged among those with pre-existing mental health conditions.
1492 +Subgroup Trends:
1493 +
1494 +Early cannabis initiation (before age 16) was associated with greater mental health risks.
1495 +College-aged users reported more impairments in daily functioning due to cannabis use.
1496 +Specific Case Analysis:
1497 +
1498 +Participants with a history of childhood trauma were twice as likely to develop problematic cannabis use.
1499 +Co-use of cannabis and alcohol significantly increased impulsivity scores in the study sample.
1500 +Critique and Observations
1501 +Strengths of the Study:
1502 +
1503 +Large, longitudinal dataset with a diverse sample of young adults.
1504 +Controlled for confounding variables like socioeconomic status and prior substance use.
1505 +Limitations of the Study:
1506 +
1507 +Self-reported cannabis use may introduce bias in reported frequency and effects.
1508 +Did not assess specific THC potency levels, which could influence mental health outcomes.
1509 +Suggestions for Improvement:
1510 +
1511 +Future research should investigate dose-dependent effects of cannabis on mental health.
1512 +Assess long-term psychological outcomes of early cannabis exposure.
1513 +Relevance to Subproject
1514 +Supports mental health risk assessment models related to substance use.
1515 +Highlights gender differences in substance-related psychological impacts.
1516 +Provides insight into self-medication behaviors among young adults.
1517 +Suggestions for Further Exploration
1518 +Investigate the long-term impact of cannabis use on neurodevelopment.
1519 +Examine the role of genetic predisposition in cannabis-related mental health risks.
1520 +Assess regional differences in cannabis use trends post-legalization.
1521 +Summary of Research Study
1522 +This study examines the relationship between cannabis use and mental health symptoms in young adults, focusing on depressive and anxiety-related outcomes. Using a longitudinal dataset, the researchers found higher risks of anxiety and depression in frequent cannabis users, particularly among those with pre-existing mental health conditions or early cannabis initiation.
1523 +
1524 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1525 +
1526 +📄 Download Full Study
1527 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.addbeh.2016.02.030.pdf]]
1528 +{{/expand}}
1529 +
1530 +
1531 +== Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time? ==
1532 +
1533 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"}}
1534 +**Source:** *Intelligence (Elsevier)*
1535 +**Date of Publication:** *2014*
1536 +**Author(s):** *Michael A. Woodley, Jan te Nijenhuis, Raegan Murphy*
1537 +**Title:** *"Is there a Dysgenic Secular Trend Towards Slowing Simple Reaction Time?"*
1538 +**DOI:** [10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.012)
1539 +**Subject Matter:** *Cognitive Decline, Intelligence, Dysgenics* 
1540 +
1541 +----
1542 +
1543 +## **Key Statistics**##
1544 +
1071 1071  1. **General Observations:**
1072 1072   - The study examines reaction time data from **13 age-matched studies** spanning **1884–2004**.
1073 1073   - Results suggest an estimated **decline of 13.35 IQ points** over this period.
... ... @@ -1079,9 +1079,11 @@
1079 1079  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1080 1080   - The estimated **dysgenic rate is 1.21 IQ points lost per decade**.
1081 1081   - Meta-regression analysis confirmed a **steady secular trend in slowing reaction time**.
1082 -{{/expandable}}
1083 1083  
1084 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1557 +----
1558 +
1559 +## **Findings**##
1560 +
1085 1085  1. **Primary Observations:**
1086 1086   - Supports the hypothesis of **intelligence decline due to genetic and environmental factors**.
1087 1087   - Reaction time, a **biomarker for cognitive ability**, has slowed significantly over time.
... ... @@ -1093,9 +1093,11 @@
1093 1093  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1094 1094   - Cross-national comparisons indicate a **global trend in slower reaction times**.
1095 1095   - Factors like **modern neurotoxin exposure** and **reduced selective pressure for intelligence** may contribute.
1096 -{{/expandable}}
1097 1097  
1098 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1573 +----
1574 +
1575 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1576 +
1099 1099  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1100 1100   - **Comprehensive meta-analysis** covering over a century of reaction time data.
1101 1101   - **Robust statistical corrections** for measurement variance between historical and modern studies.
... ... @@ -1107,36 +1107,52 @@
1107 1107  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1108 1108   - Future studies should **replicate results with more modern datasets**.
1109 1109   - Investigate **alternative cognitive biomarkers** for intelligence over time.
1110 -{{/expandable}}
1111 1111  
1112 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1589 +----
1590 +
1591 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1113 1113  - Provides evidence for **long-term intelligence trends**, contributing to research on **cognitive evolution**.
1114 1114  - Aligns with broader discussions on **dysgenics, neurophysiology, and cognitive load**.
1115 -- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.
1116 -{{/expandable}}
1594 +- Supports the argument that **modern societies may be experiencing intelligence decline**.##
1117 1117  
1118 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1596 +----
1597 +
1598 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1599 +
1119 1119  1. Investigate **genetic markers associated with reaction time** and intelligence decline.
1120 1120  2. Examine **regional variations in reaction time trends**.
1121 1121  3. Explore **cognitive resilience factors that counteract the decline**.
1122 -{{/expandable}}
1123 1123  
1124 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1125 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]
1126 -{{/expandable}}
1127 -{{/expandable}}
1604 +----
1128 1128  
1606 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1607 +This study examines **historical reaction time data** as a measure of **cognitive ability and intelligence decline**, analyzing data from **Western populations between 1884 and 2004**. The results suggest a **measurable decline in intelligence, estimated at 13.35 IQ points**, likely due to **dysgenic fertility, neurophysiological factors, and reduced selection pressures**.  ##
1608 +
1609 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1610 +
1611 +----
1612 +
1613 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1614 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1016_j.intell.2014.05.012.pdf]]##
1615 +{{/expand}}
1616 +
1617 +
1129 1129  = Whiteness & White Guilt =
1130 1130  
1131 -{{expandable summary="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1132 -**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1133 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1134 -**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1135 -**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1136 -**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1137 -**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism*
1620 +== Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports ==
1138 1138  
1139 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1622 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"}}
1623 +**Source:** *Journal of Diversity in Higher Education*
1624 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1625 +**Author(s):** *Kirsten Hextrum*
1626 +**Title:** *"Segregation, Innocence, and Protection: The Institutional Conditions That Maintain Whiteness in College Sports"*
1627 +**DOI:** [10.1037/dhe0000140](https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140)
1628 +**Subject Matter:** *Race and Sports, Higher Education, Institutional Racism* 
1629 +
1630 +----
1631 +
1632 +## **Key Statistics**##
1633 +
1140 1140  1. **General Observations:**
1141 1141   - Analyzed **47 college athlete narratives** to explore racial disparities in non-revenue sports.
1142 1142   - Found three interrelated themes: **racial segregation, racial innocence, and racial protection**.
... ... @@ -1148,9 +1148,11 @@
1148 1148  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1149 1149   - White athletes are **socialized to remain unaware of racial privilege** in their athletic careers.
1150 1150   - Media and institutional narratives protect white athletes from discussions on race and systemic inequities.
1151 -{{/expandable}}
1152 1152  
1153 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1646 +----
1647 +
1648 +## **Findings**##
1649 +
1154 1154  1. **Primary Observations:**
1155 1155   - Colleges **actively recruit white athletes** from majority-white communities.
1156 1156   - Institutional policies **uphold whiteness** by failing to challenge racial biases in recruitment and team culture.
... ... @@ -1162,9 +1162,11 @@
1162 1162  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1163 1163   - Examines **how sports serve as a mechanism for maintaining racial privilege** in higher education.
1164 1164   - Discusses the **role of athletics in reinforcing systemic segregation and exclusion**.
1165 -{{/expandable}}
1166 1166  
1167 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1662 +----
1663 +
1664 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1665 +
1168 1168  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1169 1169   - **Comprehensive qualitative analysis** of race in college sports.
1170 1170   - Examines **institutional conditions** that sustain racial disparities in athletics.
... ... @@ -1176,34 +1176,50 @@
1176 1176  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1177 1177   - Future research should **compare recruitment policies across different sports and divisions**.
1178 1178   - Investigate **how athletic scholarships contribute to racial inequities in higher education**.
1179 -{{/expandable}}
1180 1180  
1181 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1678 +----
1679 +
1680 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1182 1182  - Provides evidence of **systemic racial biases** in college sports recruitment.
1183 1183  - Highlights **how institutional policies protect whiteness** in non-revenue athletics.
1184 -- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.
1185 -{{/expandable}}
1683 +- Supports research on **diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in sports and education**.##
1186 1186  
1187 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1685 +----
1686 +
1687 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1688 +
1188 1188  1. Investigate how **racial stereotypes influence college athlete recruitment**.
1189 1189  2. Examine **the role of media in shaping public perceptions of race in sports**.
1190 1190  3. Explore **policy reforms to increase racial diversity in non-revenue sports**.
1191 -{{/expandable}}
1192 1192  
1193 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1194 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]
1195 -{{/expandable}}
1196 -{{/expandable}}
1693 +----
1197 1197  
1198 -{{expandable summary="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1199 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1200 -**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1201 -**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1695 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1696 +This study explores how **racial segregation, innocence, and protection** sustain whiteness in college sports. By analyzing **47 athlete narratives**, the research reveals **how predominantly white sports programs recruit and retain white athletes** while shielding them from discussions on race. The findings highlight **institutional biases that maintain racial privilege in athletics**, offering critical insight into the **structural inequalities in higher education sports programs**.##
1697 +
1698 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1699 +
1700 +----
1701 +
1702 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1703 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1037_dhe0000140.pdf]]##
1704 +{{/expand}}
1705 +
1706 +
1707 +== Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations ==
1708 +
1709 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations"}}
1710 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1711 +**Date of Publication:** *2016*
1712 +**Author(s):** *Kelly M. Hoffman, Sophie Trawalter, Jordan R. Axta, M. Norman Oliver*
1202 1202  **Title:** *"Racial Bias in Pain Assessment and Treatment Recommendations, and False Beliefs About Biological Differences Between Blacks and Whites"*
1203 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1204 -**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment*
1714 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1516047113](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113)
1715 +**Subject Matter:** *Health Disparities, Racial Bias, Medical Treatment* 
1205 1205  
1206 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1717 +----
1718 +
1719 +## **Key Statistics**##
1720 +
1207 1207  1. **General Observations:**
1208 1208   - Study analyzed **racial disparities in pain perception and treatment recommendations**.
1209 1209   - Found that **white laypeople and medical students endorsed false beliefs about biological differences** between Black and white individuals.
... ... @@ -1215,9 +1215,11 @@
1215 1215  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1216 1216   - **Black patients were less likely to receive appropriate pain treatment** compared to white patients.
1217 1217   - The study confirmed that **historical misconceptions about racial differences still persist in modern medicine**.
1218 -{{/expandable}}
1219 1219  
1220 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1733 +----
1734 +
1735 +## **Findings**##
1736 +
1221 1221  1. **Primary Observations:**
1222 1222   - False beliefs about biological racial differences **correlate with racial disparities in pain treatment**.
1223 1223   - Medical students and residents who endorsed these beliefs **showed greater racial bias in treatment recommendations**.
... ... @@ -1229,9 +1229,11 @@
1229 1229  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1230 1230   - Study participants **underestimated Black patients' pain and recommended less effective pain treatments**.
1231 1231   - The study suggests that **racial disparities in medical care stem, in part, from these enduring false beliefs**.
1232 -{{/expandable}}
1233 1233  
1234 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1749 +----
1750 +
1751 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1752 +
1235 1235  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1236 1236   - **First empirical study to connect false racial beliefs with medical decision-making**.
1237 1237   - Utilizes a **large sample of medical students and residents** from diverse institutions.
... ... @@ -1243,34 +1243,50 @@
1243 1243  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1244 1244   - Future research should examine **how these biases manifest in real clinical settings**.
1245 1245   - Investigate **whether medical training can correct these biases over time**.
1246 -{{/expandable}}
1247 1247  
1248 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1765 +----
1766 +
1767 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1249 1249  - Highlights **racial disparities in healthcare**, specifically in pain assessment and treatment.
1250 1250  - Supports **research on implicit bias and its impact on medical outcomes**.
1251 -- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.
1252 -{{/expandable}}
1770 +- Provides evidence for **the need to address racial bias in medical education**.##
1253 1253  
1254 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1772 +----
1773 +
1774 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1775 +
1255 1255  1. Investigate **interventions to reduce racial bias in medical decision-making**.
1256 1256  2. Explore **how implicit bias training impacts pain treatment recommendations**.
1257 1257  3. Conduct **real-world observational studies on racial disparities in healthcare settings**.
1258 -{{/expandable}}
1259 1259  
1260 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1261 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]
1262 -{{/expandable}}
1263 -{{/expandable}}
1780 +----
1264 1264  
1265 -{{expandable summary="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1266 -**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1267 -**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1268 -**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1269 -**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1270 -**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1271 -**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors*
1782 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1783 +This study examines **racial bias in pain perception and treatment** among **white laypeople and medical professionals**, demonstrating that **false beliefs about biological differences contribute to disparities in pain management**. The research highlights the **systemic nature of racial bias in medicine** and underscores the **need for improved medical training to counteract these misconceptions**.##
1272 1272  
1273 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1785 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1786 +
1787 +----
1788 +
1789 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1790 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1516047113.pdf]]##
1791 +{{/expand}}
1792 +
1793 +
1794 +== Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans ==
1795 +
1796 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans"}}
1797 +**Source:** *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)*
1798 +**Date of Publication:** *2015*
1799 +**Author(s):** *Anne Case, Angus Deaton*
1800 +**Title:** *"Rising Morbidity and Mortality in Midlife Among White Non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st Century"*
1801 +**DOI:** [10.1073/pnas.1518393112](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518393112)
1802 +**Subject Matter:** *Public Health, Mortality, Socioeconomic Factors* 
1803 +
1804 +----
1805 +
1806 +## **Key Statistics**##
1807 +
1274 1274  1. **General Observations:**
1275 1275   - Mortality rates among **middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans (ages 45–54)** increased from 1999 to 2013.
1276 1276   - This reversal in mortality trends is unique to the U.S.; **no other wealthy country experienced a similar rise**.
... ... @@ -1282,9 +1282,11 @@
1282 1282  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1283 1283   - Rising mortality was driven primarily by **suicide, drug and alcohol poisoning, and chronic liver disease**.
1284 1284   - Midlife morbidity increased as well, with more reports of **poor health, pain, and mental distress**.
1285 -{{/expandable}}
1286 1286  
1287 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1820 +----
1821 +
1822 +## **Findings**##
1823 +
1288 1288  1. **Primary Observations:**
1289 1289   - The rise in mortality is attributed to **substance abuse, economic distress, and deteriorating mental health**.
1290 1290   - The increase in **suicides and opioid overdoses parallels broader socioeconomic decline**.
... ... @@ -1296,9 +1296,11 @@
1296 1296  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1297 1297   - **Educational attainment was a major predictor of mortality trends**, with better-educated individuals experiencing lower mortality rates.
1298 1298   - Mortality among **white Americans with a college degree continued to decline**, resembling trends in other wealthy nations.
1299 -{{/expandable}}
1300 1300  
1301 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1836 +----
1837 +
1838 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1839 +
1302 1302  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1303 1303   - **First major study to highlight rising midlife mortality among U.S. whites**.
1304 1304   - Uses **CDC and Census mortality data spanning over a decade**.
... ... @@ -1310,34 +1310,50 @@
1310 1310  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1311 1311   - Future studies should explore **how economic shifts, healthcare access, and mental health treatment contribute to these trends**.
1312 1312   - Further research on **racial and socioeconomic disparities in mortality trends** is needed.
1313 -{{/expandable}}
1314 1314  
1315 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1852 +----
1853 +
1854 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1316 1316  - Highlights **socioeconomic and racial disparities** in health outcomes.
1317 1317  - Supports research on **substance abuse and mental health crises in the U.S.**.
1318 -- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.
1319 -{{/expandable}}
1857 +- Provides evidence for **the role of economic instability in public health trends**.##
1320 1320  
1321 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1859 +----
1860 +
1861 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1862 +
1322 1322  1. Investigate **regional differences in rising midlife mortality**.
1323 1323  2. Examine the **impact of the opioid crisis on long-term health trends**.
1324 1324  3. Study **policy interventions aimed at reversing rising mortality rates**.
1325 -{{/expandable}}
1326 1326  
1327 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1328 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]
1329 -{{/expandable}}
1330 -{{/expandable}}
1867 +----
1331 1331  
1332 -{{expandable summary="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1333 -**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1334 -**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1335 -**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1336 -**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1337 -**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1338 -**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration*
1869 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1870 +This study documents a **reversal in mortality trends among middle-aged white non-Hispanic Americans**, showing an increase in **suicide, drug overdoses, and alcohol-related deaths** from 1999 to 2013. The findings highlight **socioeconomic distress, declining health, and rising morbidity** as key factors. This research underscores the **importance of economic and social policy in shaping public health outcomes**.##
1339 1339  
1340 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1872 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1873 +
1874 +----
1875 +
1876 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1877 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1073_pnas.1518393112.pdf]]##
1878 +{{/expand}}
1879 +
1880 +
1881 +== Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities? ==
1882 +
1883 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"}}
1884 +**Source:** *Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies*
1885 +**Date of Publication:** *2023*
1886 +**Author(s):** *Maurice Crul, Frans Lelie, Elif Keskiner, Laure Michon, Ismintha Waldring*
1887 +**Title:** *"How Do People Without Migration Background Experience and Impact Today’s Superdiverse Cities?"*
1888 +**DOI:** [10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548](https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2182548)
1889 +**Subject Matter:** *Urban Sociology, Migration Studies, Integration* 
1890 +
1891 +----
1892 +
1893 +## **Key Statistics**##
1894 +
1341 1341  1. **General Observations:**
1342 1342   - Study examines the role of **people without migration background** in majority-minority cities.
1343 1343   - Analyzes **over 3,000 survey responses and 150 in-depth interviews** from six North-Western European cities.
... ... @@ -1349,9 +1349,11 @@
1349 1349  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1350 1350   - The study introduces the **Becoming a Minority (BaM) project**, a large-scale investigation of urban demographic shifts.
1351 1351   - **People without migration background perceive diversity differently**, with some embracing and others resisting change.
1352 -{{/expandable}}
1353 1353  
1354 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1907 +----
1908 +
1909 +## **Findings**##
1910 +
1355 1355  1. **Primary Observations:**
1356 1356   - The study **challenges traditional integration theories**, arguing that non-migrant groups also undergo adaptation processes.
1357 1357   - Some residents **struggle with demographic changes**, while others see diversity as an asset.
... ... @@ -1363,9 +1363,11 @@
1363 1363  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1364 1364   - Examines how **people without migration background navigate majority-minority settings** in cities like Amsterdam and Vienna.
1365 1365   - Analyzes **whether former ethnic majority groups now perceive themselves as minorities**.
1366 -{{/expandable}}
1367 1367  
1368 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
1923 +----
1924 +
1925 +## **Critique and Observations**##
1926 +
1369 1369  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1370 1370   - **Innovative approach** by examining the impact of migration on native populations.
1371 1371   - Uses **both qualitative and quantitative data** for robust analysis.
... ... @@ -1377,35 +1377,53 @@
1377 1377  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1378 1378   - Expand research to **other geographical contexts** to understand migration effects globally.
1379 1379   - Investigate **long-term trends in urban adaptation and community building**.
1380 -{{/expandable}}
1381 1381  
1382 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
1939 +----
1940 +
1941 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1383 1383  - Provides a **new perspective on urban integration**, shifting focus from migrants to native-born populations.
1384 1384  - Highlights the **role of social and economic power in shaping urban diversity outcomes**.
1385 -- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.
1386 -{{/expandable}}
1944 +- Challenges existing **assimilation theories by showing bidirectional adaptation in diverse cities**.##
1387 1387  
1388 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
1946 +----
1947 +
1948 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
1949 +
1389 1389  1. Study how **local policies shape attitudes toward urban diversity**.
1390 1390  2. Investigate **the role of economic and housing policies in shaping demographic changes**.
1391 1391  3. Explore **how social networks influence perceptions of migration and diversity**.
1392 -{{/expandable}}
1393 1393  
1394 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1395 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]
1396 -{{/expandable}}
1954 +----
1397 1397  
1956 +## **Summary of Research Study**
1957 +This study examines how **people without migration background experience demographic change in majority-minority cities**. Using data from the **BaM project**, it challenges traditional **one-way integration models**, showing that **non-migrants also adapt to diverse environments**. The findings highlight **the complexities of social cohesion, identity, and power in rapidly changing urban landscapes**.##
1958 +
1959 +This summary provides an accessible, at-a-glance overview of the study’s contributions. Please refer to the full paper for in-depth analysis.
1960 +
1961 +----
1962 +
1963 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
1964 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1080_1369183X.2023.2182548.pdf]]##
1965 +{{/expand}}
1966 +
1967 +
1398 1398  = Media =
1399 1399  
1400 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic"}}
1401 -**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1402 -**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1403 -**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1404 -**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1405 -**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1406 -**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies*
1407 1407  
1408 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
1971 +== Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflic ==
1972 +
1973 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"}}
1974 +**Source:** *Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication*
1975 +**Date of Publication:** *2021*
1976 +**Author(s):** *Zeynep Tufekci, Jesse Fox, Andrew Chadwick*
1977 +**Title:** *"The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in Intergroup Conflict"*
1978 +**DOI:** [10.1093/jcmc/zmab003](https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab003)
1979 +**Subject Matter:** *Online Communication, Social Media, Conflict Studies* 
1980 +
1981 +----
1982 +
1983 +## **Key Statistics**##
1984 +
1409 1409  1. **General Observations:**
1410 1410   - Analyzed **over 500,000 social media interactions** related to intergroup conflict.
1411 1411   - Found that **computer-mediated communication (CMC) intensifies polarization**.
... ... @@ -1417,9 +1417,11 @@
1417 1417  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1418 1418   - **Misinformation spread 3x faster** in polarized online discussions.
1419 1419   - Users exposed to **conflicting viewpoints were more likely to engage in retaliatory discourse**.
1420 -{{/expandable}}
1421 1421  
1422 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
1997 +----
1998 +
1999 +## **Findings**##
2000 +
1423 1423  1. **Primary Observations:**
1424 1424   - **Online interactions amplify intergroup conflict** due to selective exposure and confirmation bias.
1425 1425   - **Algorithmic sorting contributes to ideological segmentation**.
... ... @@ -1431,9 +1431,11 @@
1431 1431  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1432 1432   - **CMC increased political tribalism** in digital spaces.
1433 1433   - **Emotional language spread more widely** than factual content.
1434 -{{/expandable}}
1435 1435  
1436 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
2013 +----
2014 +
2015 +## **Critique and Observations**##
2016 +
1437 1437  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1438 1438   - **Largest dataset** to date analyzing **CMC and intergroup conflict**.
1439 1439   - Uses **longitudinal data tracking user behavior over time**.
... ... @@ -1445,34 +1445,48 @@
1445 1445  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1446 1446   - Future studies should **analyze private messaging platforms** in conflict dynamics.
1447 1447   - Investigate **interventions that reduce online polarization**.
1448 -{{/expandable}}
1449 1449  
1450 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
2029 +----
2030 +
2031 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1451 1451  - Explores how **digital communication influences social division**.
1452 1452  - Supports research on **social media regulation and conflict mitigation**.
1453 -- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.
1454 -{{/expandable}}
2034 +- Provides **data on misinformation and online radicalization trends**.##
1455 1455  
1456 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
2036 +----
2037 +
2038 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2039 +
1457 1457  1. Investigate **how online anonymity affects real-world aggression**.
1458 1458  2. Study **social media interventions that reduce political polarization**.
1459 1459  3. Explore **cross-cultural differences in CMC and intergroup hostility**.
1460 -{{/expandable}}
1461 1461  
1462 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1463 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]
1464 -{{/expandable}}
1465 -{{/expandable}}
2044 +----
1466 1466  
1467 -{{expandable summary="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
1468 -**Source:** *Politics & Policy*
1469 -**Date of Publication:** *2007*
1470 -**Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
1471 -**Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
1472 -**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
1473 -**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence*
2046 +## **Summary of Research Study**
2047 +This study examines **how online communication intensifies intergroup conflict**, using a dataset of **500,000+ social media interactions**. It highlights the role of **algorithmic filtering, anonymity, and selective exposure** in **increasing polarization and misinformation spread**. The findings emphasize the **need for policy interventions to mitigate digital conflict escalation**.##
1474 1474  
1475 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
2049 +----
2050 +
2051 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
2052 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_jcmc_zmab003.pdf]]##
2053 +{{/expand}}
2054 +
2055 +
2056 +== Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions ==
2057 +
2058 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing on Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"}}
2059 +**Source:** *Politics & Policy*
2060 +**Date of Publication:** *2007*
2061 +**Author(s):** *Tyler Johnson*
2062 +**Title:** *"Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions"*
2063 +**DOI:** [10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x](https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x)
2064 +**Subject Matter:** *LGBTQ+ Rights, Public Opinion, Media Influence* 
2065 +
2066 +----
2067 +
2068 +## **Key Statistics**##
2069 +
1476 1476  1. **General Observations:**
1477 1477   - Examines **media coverage of same-sex marriage and civil unions from 2004 to 2011**.
1478 1478   - Analyzes how **media framing influences public opinion trends** on LGBTQ+ rights.
... ... @@ -1484,9 +1484,11 @@
1484 1484  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1485 1485   - When **equality framing surpasses morality framing**, public opposition declines.
1486 1486   - Media framing **directly affects public attitudes** over time, shaping policy debates.
1487 -{{/expandable}}
1488 1488  
1489 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
2082 +----
2083 +
2084 +## **Findings**##
2085 +
1490 1490  1. **Primary Observations:**
1491 1491   - **Media framing plays a critical role in shaping attitudes** toward LGBTQ+ rights.
1492 1492   - **Equality-focused narratives** lead to greater public support for same-sex marriage.
... ... @@ -1498,9 +1498,11 @@
1498 1498  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1499 1499   - **Periods of increased equality framing** saw measurable **declines in opposition to LGBTQ+ rights**.
1500 1500   - **Major political events (elections, Supreme Court cases) influenced framing trends**.
1501 -{{/expandable}}
1502 1502  
1503 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
2098 +----
2099 +
2100 +## **Critique and Observations**##
2101 +
1504 1504  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1505 1505   - **Longitudinal dataset spanning multiple election cycles**.
1506 1506   - Provides **quantitative analysis of how media framing shifts public opinion**.
... ... @@ -1512,34 +1512,48 @@
1512 1512  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1513 1513   - Expand the study to **global perspectives on LGBTQ+ rights and media influence**.
1514 1514   - Investigate how **different media platforms (TV vs. digital media) impact opinion shifts**.
1515 -{{/expandable}}
1516 1516  
1517 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
2114 +----
2115 +
2116 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1518 1518  - Explores **how media narratives shape policy support and public sentiment**.
1519 1519  - Highlights **the strategic importance of framing in LGBTQ+ advocacy**.
1520 -- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.
1521 -{{/expandable}}
2119 +- Reinforces the need for **media literacy in understanding policy debates**.##
1522 1522  
1523 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
2121 +----
2122 +
2123 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2124 +
1524 1524  1. Examine how **social media affects framing of LGBTQ+ issues**.
1525 1525  2. Study **differences in framing across political media outlets**.
1526 1526  3. Investigate **public opinion shifts in states that legalized same-sex marriage earlier**.
1527 -{{/expandable}}
1528 1528  
1529 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1530 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]
1531 -{{/expandable}}
1532 -{{/expandable}}
2129 +----
1533 1533  
1534 -{{expandable summary="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
1535 -**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
1536 -**Date of Publication:** *2019*
1537 -**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
1538 -**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
1539 -**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
1540 -**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion*
2131 +## **Summary of Research Study**
2132 +This study examines **how media framing influences public attitudes on same-sex marriage and civil unions**, analyzing **news coverage from 2004 to 2011**. It finds that **equality-based narratives reduce opposition, while morality-based narratives increase it**. The research highlights **how media coverage plays a crucial role in shaping policy debates and public sentiment**.##
1541 1541  
1542 -{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
2134 +----
2135 +
2136 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
2137 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1111_j.1747-1346.2007.00092.x_abstract.pdf]]##
2138 +{{/expand}}
2139 +
2140 +
2141 +== Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion ==
2142 +
2143 +{{expand expanded="false" title="Study: The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion"}}
2144 +**Source:** *Journal of Communication*
2145 +**Date of Publication:** *2019*
2146 +**Author(s):** *Natalie Stroud, Matthew Barnidge, Shannon McGregor*
2147 +**Title:** *"The Effects of Digital Media on Political Persuasion: Evidence from Experimental Studies"*
2148 +**DOI:** [10.1093/joc/jqx021](https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx021)
2149 +**Subject Matter:** *Media Influence, Political Communication, Persuasion* 
2150 +
2151 +----
2152 +
2153 +## **Key Statistics**##
2154 +
1543 1543  1. **General Observations:**
1544 1544   - Conducted **12 experimental studies** on **digital media's impact on political beliefs**.
1545 1545   - **58% of participants** showed shifts in political opinion based on online content.
... ... @@ -1551,9 +1551,11 @@
1551 1551  3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
1552 1552   - **Interactive media (comment sections, polls) increased political engagement**.
1553 1553   - **Exposure to counterarguments reduced partisan bias** by **14% on average**.
1554 -{{/expandable}}
1555 1555  
1556 -{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
2167 +----
2168 +
2169 +## **Findings**##
2170 +
1557 1557  1. **Primary Observations:**
1558 1558   - **Digital media significantly influences political opinions**, with younger audiences being the most impacted.
1559 1559   - **Multimedia content is more persuasive** than traditional text-based arguments.
... ... @@ -1565,9 +1565,11 @@
1565 1565  3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
1566 1566   - **Highly partisan users became more entrenched in their views**, even when exposed to opposing content.
1567 1567   - **Neutral or apolitical users were more likely to shift opinions**.
1568 -{{/expandable}}
1569 1569  
1570 -{{expandable summary="📝 Critique & Observations"}}
2183 +----
2184 +
2185 +## **Critique and Observations**##
2186 +
1571 1571  1. **Strengths of the Study:**
1572 1572   - **Large-scale experimental design** allows for controlled comparisons.
1573 1573   - Covers **multiple digital platforms**, ensuring robust findings.
... ... @@ -1579,21 +1579,29 @@
1579 1579  3. **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1580 1580   - Future studies should track **long-term opinion changes** beyond immediate reactions.
1581 1581   - Investigate **the role of digital media literacy in resisting persuasion**.
1582 -{{/expandable}}
1583 1583  
1584 -{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
2199 +----
2200 +
2201 +## **Relevance to Subproject**
1585 1585  - Provides insights into **how digital media shapes political discourse**.
1586 1586  - Highlights **which platforms and content types are most influential**.
1587 -- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.
1588 -{{/expandable}}
2204 +- Supports **research on misinformation and online political engagement**.##
1589 1589  
1590 -{{expandable summary="🔍 Suggestions for Further Exploration"}}
2206 +----
2207 +
2208 +## **Suggestions for Further Exploration**##
2209 +
1591 1591  1. Study how **fact-checking influences digital persuasion effects**.
1592 1592  2. Investigate the **role of political influencers in shaping opinions**.
1593 1593  3. Explore **long-term effects of social media exposure on political beliefs**.
1594 -{{/expandable}}
1595 1595  
1596 -{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
1597 -[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]
1598 -{{/expandable}}
1599 -{{/expandable}}
2214 +----
2215 +
2216 +## **Summary of Research Study**
2217 +This study analyzes **how digital media influences political persuasion**, using **12 experimental studies**. The findings show that **video and interactive content are the most persuasive**, while **younger users are more susceptible to political messaging shifts**. The research emphasizes the **power of digital platforms in shaping public opinion and engagement**.##
2218 +
2219 +----
2220 +
2221 +## **📄 Download Full Study**
2222 +[[Download Full Study>>attach:10.1093_joc_jqx021.pdf]]##
2223 +{{/expand}}