Changes for page White Genocide

Summary

• Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

...	...	@@ -113,12 +113,84 @@
113	113
114	114	=== ##Former Jewish Director of National Affairs, Stephen Steinlight, discussing how the changing demographics of America are occurring too quickly. Not because this is a bad thing for the country, but it risks awakening the former White majority.## ===
115	115
116		-{{expandable summary="📄 View/Download PDF"}}
117		-{{pdf filename="Steinlight_The_Jewish_Stake_in_America_s_Changing__4e1d2459.pdf"/}}
	116	+{{expandable summary="Study: The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography"}}
	117	+**Source:** *Center for Immigration Studies*
	118	+**Date of Publication:** *October 2001*
	119	+**Author(s):** *Stephen Steinlight*
	120	+**Title:** *"The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography: Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy"*
	121	+**DOI:** Unavailable
	122	+**Subject Matter:** *Immigration, Demographics, Jewish Political Interests, Assimilation*
118	118
119		-[[View/Download PDF>>attach:Steinlight - The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography.pdf]]
	124	+{{expandable summary="📊 Key Statistics"}}
	125	+1. **General Observations:**
	126	+ - By the 2000 census, Mexican immigration had surged from fewer than 800,000 in 1970 to nearly 9 million.
	127	+ - Muslims in the U.S. estimated between 2.5 to 6 million, with political activity rapidly increasing.
	128	+ - The Hispanic/Caribbean share of 1990s U.S. immigration was approximately 55%.
	129	+
	130	+2. **Subgroup Analysis:**
	131	+ - The Jewish community was described as maintaining high political influence despite declining fertility and increasing intermarriage.
	132	+ - Jewish organizations often supported large-scale immigration publicly, despite internal unease.
	133	+
	134	+3. **Other Significant Data Points:**
	135	+ - The author predicts a long-term decline in Jewish political power due to rising Latino and Muslim demographics.
	136	+ - Jewish organizations were heavily involved in coalitions promoting immigration, even when the grassroots Jewish population was increasingly skeptical.
120	120	{{/expandable}}
121	121
	139	+{{expandable summary="🔬 Findings"}}
	140	+1. **Primary Observations:**
	141	+ - Unchecked mass immigration is presented as a potential long-term threat to Jewish political influence and cultural security in America.
	142	+ - Jewish leadership was criticized for ignoring the potential consequences of demographic shifts.
	143	+
	144	+2. **Subgroup Trends:**
	145	+ - Jewish grassroots sentiment was already diverging from leadership’s pro-immigration advocacy.
	146	+ - The rise of Islamism was explicitly identified as a security threat to Jewish interests.
	147	+
	148	+3. **Specific Case Analysis:**
	149	+ - Jewish leadership was described as supporting open immigration out of historical habit, guilt over U.S. policies in the 1920s, and fear of returning nativist sentiment.
	150	+ - Latino immigration, specifically Mexican, was seen as politically transformative with limited alignment to Jewish interests.
	151	+{{/expandable}}
	152	+
	153	+{{expandable summary="📝 Racial Bias Examination"}}
	154	+1. **Pro-White Observations:**
	155	+ - The author’s concerns inadvertently validate pro-White critiques: mass immigration reshapes demographics to the detriment of the existing ethnic majority.
	156	+ - The explicit Jewish focus on maintaining group power while simultaneously promoting diversity for the host society reveals an asymmetrical racial strategy.
	157	+
	158	+2. **Pro-White Concerns:**
	159	+ - The double standard: Jewish organizations openly pursue ethnic self-preservation while promoting policies that erode the ethnic self-preservation of Whites.
	160	+ - The selective concern over Muslim immigration, while continuing to advocate for diversity elsewhere, suggests a targeted rather than universally principled opposition to demographic change.
	161	+
	162	+3. **Potential Racial Bias:**
	163	+ - Jewish anxieties over declining group influence mirror the exact same concerns often labeled “racist” when voiced by Whites.
	164	+ - The study demonstrates that when other groups face demographic decline, it is framed as a problem to be mitigated, but when Whites face decline, it is often framed as desirable progress.
	165	+{{/expandable}}
	166	+
	167	+{{expandable summary="📌 Relevance to Subproject"}}
	168	+- This study is critical for understanding the **ethnic double standards in demographic politics.**
	169	+- It reveals that **ethnic self-interest is normalized for some groups but pathologized for Whites.**
	170	+- The Jewish community’s historical support for immigration is not universalist—it is self-protective, with limits when their group power is threatened.
	171	+- The study directly supports critiques of modern immigration policy as a **targeted demographic strategy** rather than a purely humanitarian movement.
	172	+{{/expandable}}
	173	+
	174	+{{expandable summary="🔍 Other Wiki Pages That Should Reference This Study"}}
	175	+1. [[White Decline.The Great Replacement]]
	176	+2. [[Immigration and Politics.Immigration]]
	177	+3. [[Race.Racial Demographics]]
	178	+4. [[Media, Propaganda, and Conditioning.Media Bias]]
	179	+5. [[Discrimination.Discrimination Against White People]]
	180	+6. [[Jews.Jewish Power and Influence]]
	181	+7. [[Jews.Intermarriage and Ethnic Exclusivity]]
	182	+8. [[Jews.Jewish Influence on Foreign Affairs]]
	183	+9. [[Dating and Social Media.Miscegenation]]
	184	+10. [[Ethnic Double Standards in Demographic Policy]] (Suggested New Page)
	185	+{{/expandable}}
	186	+
	187	+
	188	+{{expandable summary="📄 Download Full Study"}}
	189	+[[Download Full Study>>attach:Steinlight - The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography.pdf]]
	190	+{{/expandable}}
	191	+{{/expandable}}
	192	+
	193	+
122	122	{{putFootnotes/}}
123	123
124	124