Skip to Content

Register
Log-in
Search
- The Free Speech / Pro White Wiki
- Page Index
- User Index
- Global
- What's New
- Wiki Index

0.0
1
2
3
4
5

0 Votes

Changes for page Common Arguments

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 01:13

From 31.1 to 31.2 From 31.3 to 31.4

From version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 00:52

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 00:54

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@
  {{/expandable}}
  {{expandable summary="Would Christ turn away sufferers?"}}
--**Claim:**It's not Chrtistianlike to prioritize race
++**Claim: **It's not Chrtistianlike to prioritize race
  **Rebuttal:**
  * Aren't Jews Gods chosen people? Didn't he give them Israel?
@@ -475,57 +475,42 @@
  {{expandable summary="We can't alienate potential non-white voters."}}
  **Claim**: We must avoid alienating potential non-white voters.
  **Rebuttal:**
--*Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
--*Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
++Appeasing non-white voters cannot come at the expense of White survival.
++Political strategies do not justify policies that enable or excuse White demographic replacement.
  A policy that alienates Whites in their own countries is inherently illegitimate, regardless of electoral calculus.
  Explanation: Framing White survival as secondary to vote-getting assumes that demographics are expendable for politics. Survival is not negotiable; “votes” cannot justify population displacement or replacement.
  {{/expandable}}
--{{expandable summary="“For votes” doesn’t justify genocidal policies."}}
--Claim: Vote-getting justifies demographic policies.
--Rebuttal:
--
--A vote motive does not excuse replacement or dispossession.
--
--No political system is legitimate if it requires destroying its founding people.
--
--Claiming “votes” is a distraction from the reality of demographic attack.
--Explanation: Political expediency is not a moral shield. Policies leading to White decline remain genocidal regardless of intent.
--{{/expandable}}
--
  {{expandable summary="Whites stole America."}}
--Claim: Whites stole America.
--Rebuttal:
++**Claim**: Whites stole America.
++**Rebuttal:**
--All peoples have conquered land; conquest is universal in history.
++* All peoples have conquered land; conquest is universal in history.
++* Native tribes themselves displaced, fought, and exterminated one another long before Europeans arrived.
--Native tribes themselves displaced, fought, and exterminated one another long before Europeans arrived.
--
  Calling White conquest “theft” implies illegitimacy, but never applies that label to non-Whites doing the same.
  Explanation: If conquest voids legitimacy, then no nation or people can claim land. Singling out Whites is hypocrisy.
  {{/expandable}}
  {{expandable summary="Contradictory anti-White logic on land and borders."}}
--Claim: Whites stole land, yet borders don’t exist.
--Rebuttal:
++**Claim: **Whites stole land, yet borders don’t exist.
++**Rebuttal:**
--If land ownership is illegitimate, then no one can accuse Whites of stealing.
++* If land ownership is illegitimate, then no one can accuse Whites of stealing.
++* If land can be stolen, then borders and ownership clearly exist, making conquest legitimate.
--If land can be stolen, then borders and ownership clearly exist, making conquest legitimate.
--
  Anti-White rhetoric contradicts itself depending on which argument is convenient.
  Explanation: This reveals the agenda: delegitimizing White presence regardless of logic. It is not a principled stance, but a targeted attack.
  {{/expandable}}
  {{expandable summary="Conquest is universal, Whites have equal right."}}
--Claim: Whites conquered America, making it illegitimate.
--Rebuttal:
++**Claim: **Whites conquered America, making it illegitimate.
++**Rebuttal:**
--Conquest is how nearly all nations formed, across all races.
++* Conquest is how nearly all nations formed, across all races.
++* Whites are singled out while non-White conquests (Turks in Constantinople, Bantus in southern Africa) are ignored.
--Whites are singled out while non-White conquests (Turks in Constantinople, Bantus in southern Africa) are ignored.
--
  If conquest is universal, Whites’ claim is as legitimate as anyone else’s.
  Explanation: History cannot be selectively weaponized only against Whites.
  {{/expandable}}