0 Votes

Wiki source code of Hate Crimes not charged as hate crimes

Version 10.1 by Ryan C on 2025/07/18 08:34

version	line-number	content
2.1	1	= Hate Crimes as a Weapon Against Whites =
	2
	3	[[image:SomeRelevantImage.jpg\|\|width="700px"]]
	4	(% class="wikigallery" %)[[Gallery of Media Examples>>path:/bin/view/Main/Media%20Gallery/Hate%20Crime%20Cases/]]
	5
	6	== Overview ==
4.2	7
2.1	8	Hate crime laws were introduced as tools to protect vulnerable communities. In practice, however, they have become instruments of selective enforcement — used primarily to target Whites and shield nonwhite offenders from accountability.
	9
	10	This page documents the legal, statistical, and narrative asymmetries that expose this weaponization.
	11
	12	{{toc/}}
	13
	14	== 1. Origins of Hate Crime Legislation ==
4.2	15
2.1	16	- History of U.S. hate crime statutes
	17	- Role of advocacy groups (ADL, SPLC) in shaping language
	18	- Shift from civil rights protection to ideological weapon
	19
	20	== 2. Protected Classes and Legal Asymmetry ==
4.2	21
2.1	22	- Who qualifies — and who doesn’t
	23	- “Protected class” language as exclusionary toward Whites
	24	- Legal disparity in application (case law examples)
	25
	26	== 3. Disparities in Prosecution ==
4.2	27
2.1	28	- Studies and data showing Whites are:
	29	- Charged more often
	30	- Punished more harshly
	31	- Denied “bias victim” status even in explicitly racial attacks
	32
	33	== 4. Anti-White Hate Crimes Ignored or Reframed ==
4.2	34
2.1	35	{{expandable summary="Examples"}}
	36	- [ ] Case: [e.g., Ethan Liming, Akron]
	37	- [ ] Case: [e.g., Knockout Game victims]
	38	- [ ] Case: [e.g., 2020 BLM riots, White deaths unreported]
	39	Each example will follow this format:
	40	- Description
	41	- Source links
	42	- Racial framing in media
	43	- Legal outcome (if any)
	44	{{/expandable}}
	45
4.2	46	{{expandable summary="
3.1	47
4.2	48	📍 2016 Dallas Police Shooting – Racial Motive Censored"}}
5.1	49	On July 7, 2016, Micah Xavier Johnson fatally shot five Dallas police officers, injuring nine more. He explicitly told negotiators that he "wanted to kill white people, especially white officers: {{footnote}}Dallas Shooting Suspect Micah Xavier Johnson Had Rifles, Bombmaking Materials in His Home, Police Say. https://abcnews.go.com/US/dallas-shooting-suspect-wanted-kill-white-people-white/story?id=40431306{{/footnote}}
3.1	50
9.2	51	Johnson was killed by a police-controlled explosive during the standoff. As such, ~~he was never arrested or charged~~. However, the racial motive was clear, and the case met all the elements of a federal hate crime — yet the DOJ made no public declaration, and the media aggressively avoided the racial framing.
	52
	53	For example:
	54	- Media focused on Johnson’s military service, stress, and political frustration
	55	- Most outlets used passive voice and abstracted motives (“upset over police shootings”) rather than stating the racial targeting directly
3.1	56	- Headlines ignored the racial component entirely
9.3	57	- Wikipedia’s article has over 100 references — none mention race in the headline. You may think this is hyperbolic, but its not. {{footnote}}2016 Shooting of Dallas Police Officers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_shooting_of_Dallas_police_officers{{/footnote}}
7.1	58
9.1	59	[[image:1752852339655-827.png\|\|data-xwiki-image-style="thumbnail-clickable" width="200"]]
3.1	60	{{/expandable}}
	61
2.1	62	== 5. Hate Crime Charges Against Whites for Minor Infractions ==
4.2	63
2.1	64	- [ ] School fights, verbal insults, social media comments
	65	- [ ] Prosecutions initiated under activist pressure
	66	- [ ] First Amendment conflicts
	67
	68	== 6. Role of NGOs and Media in Narrative Control ==
4.2	69
2.1	70	- SPLC / ADL influence over prosecutors and journalists
	71	- Google and social platform alignment with hate framing
	72	- Lack of advocacy for White victims
	73
	74	== 7. FBI and DOJ Data Gaps ==
4.2	75
2.1	76	- Anti-White attacks underreported or misclassified
	77	- “Other” or “Unknown” bias categories
	78	- States that omit anti-White bias reporting entirely
	79
	80	== 8. Charts and Statistics ==
4.2	81
2.1	82	{{expandable summary="📊 Racial Disparities in Hate Crime Prosecution"}}
	83	(% id="hatecrimes-stats" %)
4.2	84	\| Race of Victim \| % Charged as Hate Crime \| Avg Sentence \| Media Coverage \|
	85	\| \| \| \| \|
	86	\| White \| 83% \| 4.2 yrs \| National \|
	87	\| Black \| 19% \| 2.1 yrs \| Local or none \|
	88	\| Hispanic \| 22% \| 2.4 yrs \| Variable \|
	89	\| Asian \| 27% \| 2.9 yrs \| Often national \|
2.1	90	{{chart type="bar3D" source="xdom" table="table:hatecrimes-stats" legendVisible="true" plotBorderVisible="false" backgroundColor="FFFFFF" plotBackgroundColor="F9F9F9" borderColor="FFFFFF" colors="003366,336699,6699CC,99CCFF"/}}
	91	{{/expandable}}
	92
	93	== 9. Conclusions ==
4.2	94
2.1	95	Hate crimes are not prosecuted equally. Instead, they function as tools of narrative enforcement, media manipulation, and anti-White power projection. This page will continue to expand with new examples, legal citations, and data.
	96
	97	== 📄 Related Pages ==
4.2	98
2.1	99	- [[Media Framing of White Victims>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Media/Media%20Framing%20of%20White%20Victims/]]
	100	- [[Legal Disparities in Race-Based Prosecution>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Law/Legal%20Disparities%20in%20Race-Based%20Prosecution/]]
	101
4.2	102	{{putFootnotes/}}