Skip to Content
0 Votes
Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 04:18
From version 9.2
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/07/18 08:32
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 9.3
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/07/18 08:33
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -56,17 +56,13 @@
56 56  - Most outlets used passive voice and abstracted motives (“upset over police shootings”) rather than stating the racial targeting directly
57 57  
58 58  This case shows how hate crimes against White people can be erased not through legal omission, but through narrative control. The framing minimized the racial nature of the crime to avoid disrupting politically useful narratives.
59 -~{~{/expandable}}
60 60  
61 61  
62 62  Despite this clear racial motive:
63 63  - Headlines ignored the racial component entirely
64 -- Wikipedia’s article has over 100 references — none mention race in the headline. You may think this is hyperbolic, but its not. /foot
63 +- Wikipedia’s article has over 100 references — none mention race in the headline. You may think this is hyperbolic, but its not. {{footnote}}2016 Shooting of Dallas Police Officers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_shooting_of_Dallas_police_officers{{/footnote}}
65 65  
66 66  [[image:1752852339655-827.png||data-xwiki-image-style="thumbnail-clickable" width="200"]]
67 -- Media framing emphasized Johnson’s mental state, military background, and frustration over “social injustice”
68 -
69 -This is a textbook example of hate crime reclassification through omission — a crime that met every standard for racial bias but was deliberately stripped of that framing because the victims were White.
70 70  {{/expandable}}
71 71  
72 72  == 5. Hate Crime Charges Against Whites for Minor Infractions ==