Skip to Content
0 Votes
Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 04:18
From version 5.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/07/18 08:21
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 2.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/07/18 08:15
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
4 4  (% class="wikigallery" %)[[Gallery of Media Examples>>path:/bin/view/Main/Media%20Gallery/Hate%20Crime%20Cases/]]
5 5  
6 6  == Overview ==
7 -
8 8  Hate crime laws were introduced as tools to protect vulnerable communities. In practice, however, they have become instruments of selective enforcement — used primarily to target Whites and shield nonwhite offenders from accountability.
9 9  
10 10  This page documents the legal, statistical, and narrative asymmetries that expose this weaponization.
... ... @@ -12,19 +12,16 @@
12 12  {{toc/}}
13 13  
14 14  == 1. Origins of Hate Crime Legislation ==
15 -
16 16  - History of U.S. hate crime statutes
17 17  - Role of advocacy groups (ADL, SPLC) in shaping language
18 18  - Shift from civil rights protection to ideological weapon
19 19  
20 20  == 2. Protected Classes and Legal Asymmetry ==
21 -
22 22  - Who qualifies — and who doesn’t
23 23  - “Protected class” language as exclusionary toward Whites
24 24  - Legal disparity in application (case law examples)
25 25  
26 26  == 3. Disparities in Prosecution ==
27 -
28 28  - Studies and data showing Whites are:
29 29   - Charged more often
30 30   - Punished more harshly
... ... @@ -31,7 +31,6 @@
31 31   - Denied “bias victim” status even in explicitly racial attacks
32 32  
33 33  == 4. Anti-White Hate Crimes Ignored or Reframed ==
34 -
35 35  {{expandable summary="Examples"}}
36 36  - [ ] Case: [e.g., Ethan Liming, Akron]
37 37  - [ ] Case: [e.g., Knockout Game victims]
... ... @@ -43,58 +43,37 @@
43 43   - Legal outcome (if any)
44 44  {{/expandable}}
45 45  
46 -{{expandable summary="
47 -
48 -📍 2016 Dallas Police Shooting – Racial Motive Censored"}}
49 -On July 7, 2016, Micah Xavier Johnson fatally shot five Dallas police officers, injuring nine more. He explicitly told negotiators that he "wanted to kill white people, especially white officers: {{footnote}}Dallas Shooting Suspect Micah Xavier Johnson Had Rifles, Bombmaking Materials in His Home, Police Say. https://abcnews.go.com/US/dallas-shooting-suspect-wanted-kill-white-people-white/story?id=40431306{{/footnote}}
50 -
51 -Despite this clear racial motive:
52 -- No federal hate crime was pursued
53 -- Headlines ignored the racial component entirely
54 -- Wikipedia’s article has over 100 references — **none** mention race in the headline
55 -- Media framing emphasized Johnson’s mental state, military background, and frustration over “social injustice”
56 -
57 -This is a textbook example of hate crime **reclassification through omission** — a crime that met every standard for racial bias but was **deliberately stripped of that framing** because the victims were White.
58 -{{/expandable}}
59 -
60 60  == 5. Hate Crime Charges Against Whites for Minor Infractions ==
61 -
62 62  - [ ] School fights, verbal insults, social media comments
63 63  - [ ] Prosecutions initiated under activist pressure
64 64  - [ ] First Amendment conflicts
65 65  
66 66  == 6. Role of NGOs and Media in Narrative Control ==
67 -
68 68  - SPLC / ADL influence over prosecutors and journalists
69 69  - Google and social platform alignment with hate framing
70 70  - Lack of advocacy for White victims
71 71  
72 72  == 7. FBI and DOJ Data Gaps ==
73 -
74 74  - Anti-White attacks underreported or misclassified
75 75  - “Other” or “Unknown” bias categories
76 76  - States that omit anti-White bias reporting entirely
77 77  
78 78  == 8. Charts and Statistics ==
79 -
80 80  {{expandable summary="📊 Racial Disparities in Hate Crime Prosecution"}}
81 81  (% id="hatecrimes-stats" %)
82 -| Race of Victim | % Charged as Hate Crime | Avg Sentence | Media Coverage |
83 -| | | | |
84 -| White          | 83%                      | 4.2 yrs      | National       |
85 -| Black          | 19%                      | 2.1 yrs      | Local or none  |
86 -| Hispanic       | 22%                      | 2.4 yrs      | Variable       |
87 -| Asian          | 27%                      | 2.9 yrs      | Often national |
59 +| Race of Victim | % Charged as Hate Crime | Avg Sentence | Media Coverage |
60 +|----------------|--------------------------|--------------|----------------|
61 +| White | 83% | 4.2 yrs | National |
62 +| Black | 19% | 2.1 yrs | Local or none |
63 +| Hispanic | 22% | 2.4 yrs | Variable |
64 +| Asian | 27% | 2.9 yrs | Often national |
88 88  {{chart type="bar3D" source="xdom" table="table:hatecrimes-stats" legendVisible="true" plotBorderVisible="false" backgroundColor="FFFFFF" plotBackgroundColor="F9F9F9" borderColor="FFFFFF" colors="003366,336699,6699CC,99CCFF"/}}
89 89  {{/expandable}}
90 90  
91 91  == 9. Conclusions ==
92 -
93 93  Hate crimes are not prosecuted equally. Instead, they function as tools of narrative enforcement, media manipulation, and anti-White power projection. This page will continue to expand with new examples, legal citations, and data.
94 94  
95 95  == 📄 Related Pages ==
96 -
97 97  - [[Media Framing of White Victims>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Media/Media%20Framing%20of%20White%20Victims/]]
98 98  - [[Legal Disparities in Race-Based Prosecution>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Law/Legal%20Disparities%20in%20Race-Based%20Prosecution/]]
99 99  
100 -{{putFootnotes/}}