... |
... |
@@ -1,100 +1,0 @@ |
1 |
|
-= Hate Crimes as a Weapon Against Whites = |
2 |
|
- |
3 |
|
-[[image:SomeRelevantImage.jpg||width="700px"]] |
4 |
|
-(% class="wikigallery" %)[[Gallery of Media Examples>>path:/bin/view/Main/Media%20Gallery/Hate%20Crime%20Cases/]] |
5 |
|
- |
6 |
|
-== Overview == |
7 |
|
- |
8 |
|
-Hate crime laws were introduced as tools to protect vulnerable communities. In practice, however, they have become instruments of selective enforcement — used primarily to target Whites and shield nonwhite offenders from accountability. |
9 |
|
- |
10 |
|
-This page documents the legal, statistical, and narrative asymmetries that expose this weaponization. |
11 |
|
- |
12 |
|
-{{toc/}} |
13 |
|
- |
14 |
|
-== 1. Origins of Hate Crime Legislation == |
15 |
|
- |
16 |
|
-- History of U.S. hate crime statutes |
17 |
|
-- Role of advocacy groups (ADL, SPLC) in shaping language |
18 |
|
-- Shift from civil rights protection to ideological weapon |
19 |
|
- |
20 |
|
-== 2. Protected Classes and Legal Asymmetry == |
21 |
|
- |
22 |
|
-- Who qualifies — and who doesn’t |
23 |
|
-- “Protected class” language as exclusionary toward Whites |
24 |
|
-- Legal disparity in application (case law examples) |
25 |
|
- |
26 |
|
-== 3. Disparities in Prosecution == |
27 |
|
- |
28 |
|
-- Studies and data showing Whites are: |
29 |
|
- - Charged more often |
30 |
|
- - Punished more harshly |
31 |
|
- - Denied “bias victim” status even in explicitly racial attacks |
32 |
|
- |
33 |
|
-== 4. Anti-White Hate Crimes Ignored or Reframed == |
34 |
|
- |
35 |
|
-{{expandable summary="Examples"}} |
36 |
|
-- [ ] Case: [e.g., Ethan Liming, Akron] |
37 |
|
-- [ ] Case: [e.g., Knockout Game victims] |
38 |
|
-- [ ] Case: [e.g., 2020 BLM riots, White deaths unreported] |
39 |
|
-Each example will follow this format: |
40 |
|
- - Description |
41 |
|
- - Source links |
42 |
|
- - Racial framing in media |
43 |
|
- - Legal outcome (if any) |
44 |
|
-{{/expandable}} |
45 |
|
- |
46 |
|
-{{expandable summary=" |
47 |
|
- |
48 |
|
-📍 2016 Dallas Police Shooting – Racial Motive Censored"}} |
49 |
|
-On July 7, 2016, Micah Xavier Johnson fatally shot five Dallas police officers, injuring nine more. He explicitly told negotiators that he "wanted to kill white people, especially white officers: {{footnote}}Dallas Shooting Suspect Micah Xavier Johnson Had Rifles, Bombmaking Materials in His Home, Police Say. https://abcnews.go.com/US/dallas-shooting-suspect-wanted-kill-white-people-white/story?id=40431306{{/footnote}} |
50 |
|
- |
51 |
|
-Despite this clear racial motive: |
52 |
|
-- No federal hate crime was pursued |
53 |
|
-- Headlines ignored the racial component entirely |
54 |
|
-- Wikipedia’s article has over 100 references — **none** mention race in the headline |
55 |
|
-- Media framing emphasized Johnson’s mental state, military background, and frustration over “social injustice” |
56 |
|
- |
57 |
|
-This is a textbook example of hate crime **reclassification through omission** — a crime that met every standard for racial bias but was **deliberately stripped of that framing** because the victims were White. |
58 |
|
-{{/expandable}} |
59 |
|
- |
60 |
|
-== 5. Hate Crime Charges Against Whites for Minor Infractions == |
61 |
|
- |
62 |
|
-- [ ] School fights, verbal insults, social media comments |
63 |
|
-- [ ] Prosecutions initiated under activist pressure |
64 |
|
-- [ ] First Amendment conflicts |
65 |
|
- |
66 |
|
-== 6. Role of NGOs and Media in Narrative Control == |
67 |
|
- |
68 |
|
-- SPLC / ADL influence over prosecutors and journalists |
69 |
|
-- Google and social platform alignment with hate framing |
70 |
|
-- Lack of advocacy for White victims |
71 |
|
- |
72 |
|
-== 7. FBI and DOJ Data Gaps == |
73 |
|
- |
74 |
|
-- Anti-White attacks underreported or misclassified |
75 |
|
-- “Other” or “Unknown” bias categories |
76 |
|
-- States that omit anti-White bias reporting entirely |
77 |
|
- |
78 |
|
-== 8. Charts and Statistics == |
79 |
|
- |
80 |
|
-{{expandable summary="📊 Racial Disparities in Hate Crime Prosecution"}} |
81 |
|
-(% id="hatecrimes-stats" %) |
82 |
|
-| Race of Victim | % Charged as Hate Crime | Avg Sentence | Media Coverage | |
83 |
|
-| | | | | |
84 |
|
-| White | 83% | 4.2 yrs | National | |
85 |
|
-| Black | 19% | 2.1 yrs | Local or none | |
86 |
|
-| Hispanic | 22% | 2.4 yrs | Variable | |
87 |
|
-| Asian | 27% | 2.9 yrs | Often national | |
88 |
|
-{{chart type="bar3D" source="xdom" table="table:hatecrimes-stats" legendVisible="true" plotBorderVisible="false" backgroundColor="FFFFFF" plotBackgroundColor="F9F9F9" borderColor="FFFFFF" colors="003366,336699,6699CC,99CCFF"/}} |
89 |
|
-{{/expandable}} |
90 |
|
- |
91 |
|
-== 9. Conclusions == |
92 |
|
- |
93 |
|
-Hate crimes are not prosecuted equally. Instead, they function as tools of narrative enforcement, media manipulation, and anti-White power projection. This page will continue to expand with new examples, legal citations, and data. |
94 |
|
- |
95 |
|
-== 📄 Related Pages == |
96 |
|
- |
97 |
|
-- [[Media Framing of White Victims>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Media/Media%20Framing%20of%20White%20Victims/]] |
98 |
|
-- [[Legal Disparities in Race-Based Prosecution>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Law/Legal%20Disparities%20in%20Race-Based%20Prosecution/]] |
99 |
|
- |
100 |
|
-{{putFootnotes/}} |