Skip to Content
0 Votes
Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 04:18
From version 2.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/07/18 08:15
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 9.2
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/07/18 08:32
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
4 4  (% class="wikigallery" %)[[Gallery of Media Examples>>path:/bin/view/Main/Media%20Gallery/Hate%20Crime%20Cases/]]
5 5  
6 6  == Overview ==
7 +
7 7  Hate crime laws were introduced as tools to protect vulnerable communities. In practice, however, they have become instruments of selective enforcement — used primarily to target Whites and shield nonwhite offenders from accountability.
8 8  
9 9  This page documents the legal, statistical, and narrative asymmetries that expose this weaponization.
... ... @@ -11,16 +11,19 @@
11 11  {{toc/}}
12 12  
13 13  == 1. Origins of Hate Crime Legislation ==
15 +
14 14  - History of U.S. hate crime statutes
15 15  - Role of advocacy groups (ADL, SPLC) in shaping language
16 16  - Shift from civil rights protection to ideological weapon
17 17  
18 18  == 2. Protected Classes and Legal Asymmetry ==
21 +
19 19  - Who qualifies — and who doesn’t
20 20  - “Protected class” language as exclusionary toward Whites
21 21  - Legal disparity in application (case law examples)
22 22  
23 23  == 3. Disparities in Prosecution ==
27 +
24 24  - Studies and data showing Whites are:
25 25   - Charged more often
26 26   - Punished more harshly
... ... @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
27 27   - Denied “bias victim” status even in explicitly racial attacks
28 28  
29 29  == 4. Anti-White Hate Crimes Ignored or Reframed ==
34 +
30 30  {{expandable summary="Examples"}}
31 31  - [ ] Case: [e.g., Ethan Liming, Akron]
32 32  - [ ] Case: [e.g., Knockout Game victims]
... ... @@ -38,37 +38,70 @@
38 38   - Legal outcome (if any)
39 39  {{/expandable}}
40 40  
46 +{{expandable summary="
47 +
48 +📍 2016 Dallas Police Shooting – Racial Motive Censored"}}
49 +On July 7, 2016, Micah Xavier Johnson fatally shot five Dallas police officers, injuring nine more. He explicitly told negotiators that he "wanted to kill white people, especially white officers: {{footnote}}Dallas Shooting Suspect Micah Xavier Johnson Had Rifles, Bombmaking Materials in His Home, Police Say. https://abcnews.go.com/US/dallas-shooting-suspect-wanted-kill-white-people-white/story?id=40431306{{/footnote}}
50 +
51 +Johnson was killed by a police-controlled explosive during the standoff. As such, ~*~*he was never arrested or charged~*~*. However, the racial motive was clear, and the case met all the elements of a federal hate crime — yet the DOJ made no public declaration, and the media aggressively avoided the racial framing.
52 +
53 +For example:
54 +- The [Wikipedia article](https:~/~/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_shooting_of_Dallas_police_officers) cites over 100 news sources — yet ~*~*none mention race in their headlines~*~*
55 +- Media focused on Johnson’s military service, stress, and political frustration
56 +- Most outlets used passive voice and abstracted motives (“upset over police shootings”) rather than stating the racial targeting directly
57 +
58 +This case shows how hate crimes against White people can be erased not through legal omission, but through narrative control. The framing minimized the racial nature of the crime to avoid disrupting politically useful narratives.
59 +~{~{/expandable}}
60 +
61 +
62 +Despite this clear racial motive:
63 +- Headlines ignored the racial component entirely
64 +- Wikipedia’s article has over 100 references — none mention race in the headline. You may think this is hyperbolic, but its not. /foot
65 +
66 +[[image:1752852339655-827.png||data-xwiki-image-style="thumbnail-clickable" width="200"]]
67 +- Media framing emphasized Johnson’s mental state, military background, and frustration over “social injustice”
68 +
69 +This is a textbook example of hate crime reclassification through omission — a crime that met every standard for racial bias but was deliberately stripped of that framing because the victims were White.
70 +{{/expandable}}
71 +
41 41  == 5. Hate Crime Charges Against Whites for Minor Infractions ==
73 +
42 42  - [ ] School fights, verbal insults, social media comments
43 43  - [ ] Prosecutions initiated under activist pressure
44 44  - [ ] First Amendment conflicts
45 45  
46 46  == 6. Role of NGOs and Media in Narrative Control ==
79 +
47 47  - SPLC / ADL influence over prosecutors and journalists
48 48  - Google and social platform alignment with hate framing
49 49  - Lack of advocacy for White victims
50 50  
51 51  == 7. FBI and DOJ Data Gaps ==
85 +
52 52  - Anti-White attacks underreported or misclassified
53 53  - “Other” or “Unknown” bias categories
54 54  - States that omit anti-White bias reporting entirely
55 55  
56 56  == 8. Charts and Statistics ==
91 +
57 57  {{expandable summary="📊 Racial Disparities in Hate Crime Prosecution"}}
58 58  (% id="hatecrimes-stats" %)
59 -| Race of Victim | % Charged as Hate Crime | Avg Sentence | Media Coverage |
60 -|----------------|--------------------------|--------------|----------------|
61 -| White | 83% | 4.2 yrs | National |
62 -| Black | 19% | 2.1 yrs | Local or none |
63 -| Hispanic | 22% | 2.4 yrs | Variable |
64 -| Asian | 27% | 2.9 yrs | Often national |
94 +| Race of Victim | % Charged as Hate Crime | Avg Sentence | Media Coverage |
95 +| | | | |
96 +| White          | 83%                      | 4.2 yrs      | National       |
97 +| Black          | 19%                      | 2.1 yrs      | Local or none  |
98 +| Hispanic       | 22%                      | 2.4 yrs      | Variable       |
99 +| Asian          | 27%                      | 2.9 yrs      | Often national |
65 65  {{chart type="bar3D" source="xdom" table="table:hatecrimes-stats" legendVisible="true" plotBorderVisible="false" backgroundColor="FFFFFF" plotBackgroundColor="F9F9F9" borderColor="FFFFFF" colors="003366,336699,6699CC,99CCFF"/}}
66 66  {{/expandable}}
67 67  
68 68  == 9. Conclusions ==
104 +
69 69  Hate crimes are not prosecuted equally. Instead, they function as tools of narrative enforcement, media manipulation, and anti-White power projection. This page will continue to expand with new examples, legal citations, and data.
70 70  
71 71  == 📄 Related Pages ==
108 +
72 72  - [[Media Framing of White Victims>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Media/Media%20Framing%20of%20White%20Victims/]]
73 73  - [[Legal Disparities in Race-Based Prosecution>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Law/Legal%20Disparities%20in%20Race-Based%20Prosecution/]]
74 74  
112 +{{putFootnotes/}}
1752852286848-220.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +334.2 KB
Content
1752852339655-827.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.AdminAngriff
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +327.5 KB
Content