Skip to Content
0 Votes
Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 04:18
From version 2.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/07/18 08:15
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 5.1
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/07/18 08:21
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
4 4  (% class="wikigallery" %)[[Gallery of Media Examples>>path:/bin/view/Main/Media%20Gallery/Hate%20Crime%20Cases/]]
5 5  
6 6  == Overview ==
7 +
7 7  Hate crime laws were introduced as tools to protect vulnerable communities. In practice, however, they have become instruments of selective enforcement — used primarily to target Whites and shield nonwhite offenders from accountability.
8 8  
9 9  This page documents the legal, statistical, and narrative asymmetries that expose this weaponization.
... ... @@ -11,16 +11,19 @@
11 11  {{toc/}}
12 12  
13 13  == 1. Origins of Hate Crime Legislation ==
15 +
14 14  - History of U.S. hate crime statutes
15 15  - Role of advocacy groups (ADL, SPLC) in shaping language
16 16  - Shift from civil rights protection to ideological weapon
17 17  
18 18  == 2. Protected Classes and Legal Asymmetry ==
21 +
19 19  - Who qualifies — and who doesn’t
20 20  - “Protected class” language as exclusionary toward Whites
21 21  - Legal disparity in application (case law examples)
22 22  
23 23  == 3. Disparities in Prosecution ==
27 +
24 24  - Studies and data showing Whites are:
25 25   - Charged more often
26 26   - Punished more harshly
... ... @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
27 27   - Denied “bias victim” status even in explicitly racial attacks
28 28  
29 29  == 4. Anti-White Hate Crimes Ignored or Reframed ==
34 +
30 30  {{expandable summary="Examples"}}
31 31  - [ ] Case: [e.g., Ethan Liming, Akron]
32 32  - [ ] Case: [e.g., Knockout Game victims]
... ... @@ -38,37 +38,58 @@
38 38   - Legal outcome (if any)
39 39  {{/expandable}}
40 40  
46 +{{expandable summary="
47 +
48 +📍 2016 Dallas Police Shooting – Racial Motive Censored"}}
49 +On July 7, 2016, Micah Xavier Johnson fatally shot five Dallas police officers, injuring nine more. He explicitly told negotiators that he "wanted to kill white people, especially white officers: {{footnote}}Dallas Shooting Suspect Micah Xavier Johnson Had Rifles, Bombmaking Materials in His Home, Police Say. https://abcnews.go.com/US/dallas-shooting-suspect-wanted-kill-white-people-white/story?id=40431306{{/footnote}}
50 +
51 +Despite this clear racial motive:
52 +- No federal hate crime was pursued
53 +- Headlines ignored the racial component entirely
54 +- Wikipedia’s article has over 100 references — **none** mention race in the headline
55 +- Media framing emphasized Johnson’s mental state, military background, and frustration over “social injustice”
56 +
57 +This is a textbook example of hate crime **reclassification through omission** — a crime that met every standard for racial bias but was **deliberately stripped of that framing** because the victims were White.
58 +{{/expandable}}
59 +
41 41  == 5. Hate Crime Charges Against Whites for Minor Infractions ==
61 +
42 42  - [ ] School fights, verbal insults, social media comments
43 43  - [ ] Prosecutions initiated under activist pressure
44 44  - [ ] First Amendment conflicts
45 45  
46 46  == 6. Role of NGOs and Media in Narrative Control ==
67 +
47 47  - SPLC / ADL influence over prosecutors and journalists
48 48  - Google and social platform alignment with hate framing
49 49  - Lack of advocacy for White victims
50 50  
51 51  == 7. FBI and DOJ Data Gaps ==
73 +
52 52  - Anti-White attacks underreported or misclassified
53 53  - “Other” or “Unknown” bias categories
54 54  - States that omit anti-White bias reporting entirely
55 55  
56 56  == 8. Charts and Statistics ==
79 +
57 57  {{expandable summary="📊 Racial Disparities in Hate Crime Prosecution"}}
58 58  (% id="hatecrimes-stats" %)
59 -| Race of Victim | % Charged as Hate Crime | Avg Sentence | Media Coverage |
60 -|----------------|--------------------------|--------------|----------------|
61 -| White | 83% | 4.2 yrs | National |
62 -| Black | 19% | 2.1 yrs | Local or none |
63 -| Hispanic | 22% | 2.4 yrs | Variable |
64 -| Asian | 27% | 2.9 yrs | Often national |
82 +| Race of Victim | % Charged as Hate Crime | Avg Sentence | Media Coverage |
83 +| | | | |
84 +| White          | 83%                      | 4.2 yrs      | National       |
85 +| Black          | 19%                      | 2.1 yrs      | Local or none  |
86 +| Hispanic       | 22%                      | 2.4 yrs      | Variable       |
87 +| Asian          | 27%                      | 2.9 yrs      | Often national |
65 65  {{chart type="bar3D" source="xdom" table="table:hatecrimes-stats" legendVisible="true" plotBorderVisible="false" backgroundColor="FFFFFF" plotBackgroundColor="F9F9F9" borderColor="FFFFFF" colors="003366,336699,6699CC,99CCFF"/}}
66 66  {{/expandable}}
67 67  
68 68  == 9. Conclusions ==
92 +
69 69  Hate crimes are not prosecuted equally. Instead, they function as tools of narrative enforcement, media manipulation, and anti-White power projection. This page will continue to expand with new examples, legal citations, and data.
70 70  
71 71  == 📄 Related Pages ==
96 +
72 72  - [[Media Framing of White Victims>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Media/Media%20Framing%20of%20White%20Victims/]]
73 73  - [[Legal Disparities in Race-Based Prosecution>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Law/Legal%20Disparities%20in%20Race-Based%20Prosecution/]]
74 74  
100 +{{putFootnotes/}}