Skip to Content
0 Votes
Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 04:18
From version 19.3
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 03:58
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 20.2
edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 04:09
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -174,24 +174,20 @@
174 174  == Charts and Statistics ==
175 175  
176 176  The gap between raw victimization data and official hate crime reporting is stark. Bureau of Justice Statistics victimization surveys (2018 data) reveal:
177 -\\[[image:file-UFDDDW8zXThEKNok4UtqhM||alt="Uploaded image" height="251" width="1011"]]
177 +\\
178 178  
179 -Approximately 550,000 Black-on-White violent incidents occurred in a single year, compared to only 90,000 White-on-Black incidents.
179 +[[Caption ~[~[https:~~~~/~~~~/www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/117762/documents/HHRG-118-JU08-20241217-SD004-U4.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com~>~>https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/117762/documents/HHRG-118-JU08-20241217-SD004-U4.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com~]~]>>image:file-UFDDDW8zXThEKNok4UtqhM||alt="Uploaded image" height="251" width="1011"]]
180 180  
181 -42% of the victims of Black offenders were White, whereas only 3.5% of the victims of White offenders were Black.
181 +Approximately 550,000 Black-on-White violent incidents occurred in a single year, compared to only 90,000 White-on-Black incidents. 42 percent of the victims of Black offenders were White, whereas only 3.5 percent of the victims of White offenders were Black. From the victim’s perspective, 14 percent of White violent-crime victims were attacked by Blacks, while 13 percent of Black victims were attacked by Whites. 
182 182  
183 -From the victim’s perspective, 14% of White violent-crime victims were attacked by Blacks, while 13% of Black victims were attacked by Whites.
183 +These numbers demonstrate two realities. First, Whites are disproportionately targeted by interracial violence, far beyond the reverse. Second, when measured as a share of offending, Black perpetrators select White victims at vastly higher rates. Yet FBI hate crime reports obscure this picture, presenting Whites mainly as perpetrators while suppressing or misclassifying anti-White victimization. This disconnect shows how statistics are weaponized — not to describe reality, but to enforce a narrative of White guilt and minority victimhood. 
184 184  
185 -These numbers demonstrate two realities. First, Whites are disproportionately targeted by interracial violence, far beyond the reverse. Second, when measured as a share of offending, Black perpetrators select White victims at vastly higher rates.
185 +Additional survey evidence confirms this asymmetry. The American National Election Studies (ANES) 2020 Time Series data shows that Whites rate all groups roughly equally, with little in-group preference, while every other racial group rates itself highest and Whites lowest. Black respondents, in particular, display the strongest negative bias toward Whites. This makes Whites the least ethnocentric and least racially biased group in the United States. 
186 186  
187 -Yet FBI hate crime reports obscure this picture, presenting Whites mainly as perpetrators while suppressing or misclassifying anti-White victimization. This disconnect shows how statistics are weaponized — not to describe reality, but to enforce a narrative of White guilt and minority victimhood.
188 -
189 189  == Conclusions ==
190 190  
191 -Hate crime statutes, originally introduced under the banner of civil rights, have evolved into instruments of selective prosecution and ideological control. Whites are punished more harshly when offenders, but denied recognition and equal protection when victims.
189 +Hate crime statutes, originally introduced under the banner of civil rights, have evolved into instruments of selective prosecution and ideological control. Whites are punished more harshly when offenders, but denied recognition and equal protection when victims.Through advocacy pressure, media framing, and statistical manipulation, the reality of anti-White victimization is erased while prosecutions of Whites are expanded. The law thus functions not as a shield of justice, but as a permanent mechanism of racial asymmetry.
192 192  
193 -Through advocacy pressure, media framing, and statistical manipulation, the reality of anti-White victimization is erased while prosecutions of Whites are expanded. The law thus functions not as a shield of justice, but as a permanent mechanism of racial asymmetry.
194 -
195 195  This page will continue to expand with new examples, legal citations, and statistical data to document the extent of this asymmetry.
196 196  
197 197  == Related Pages ==