Skip to Content

Register
Log-in
Search
- The Free Speech / Pro White Wiki
- Page Index
- User Index
- Global
- What's New
- Wiki Index

0.0
1
2
3
4
5

0 Votes

Changes for page Hate Crimes not charged as hate crimes

Last modified by Ryan C on 2025/08/18 04:18

From 14.1 to 13.1 From 16.1 to 15.1

From version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 01:34

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

To version

edited by Ryan C
on 2025/08/18 01:22

Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Raw
Rendered

Summary

Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)

Details

Page properties

Content

@@ -1,52 +1,48 @@
  = Hate Crimes as a Weapon Against Whites =
++[[image:SomeRelevantImage.jpg||width="700px"]]
++(% class="wikigallery" %)[[Gallery of Media Examples>>path:/bin/view/Main/Media%20Gallery/Hate%20Crime%20Cases/]]
  == Overview ==
--Hate crime laws were originally presented as protections for vulnerable communities. In practice, however, they have evolved into instruments of selective enforcement — applied disproportionately against Whites while ignoring or downplaying attacks committed against them.
++Hate crime laws were introduced as tools to protect vulnerable communities. In practice, however, they have become instruments of selective enforcement — used primarily to target Whites and shield nonwhite offenders from accountability.
--This page examines the origins of hate crime statutes, their unequal application, and the way media and government institutions use them as tools of narrative control.
++This page documents the legal, statistical, and narrative asymmetries that expose this weaponization.
  {{toc/}}
  == 1. Origins of Hate Crime Legislation ==
--The first modern hate crime statutes in the United States were introduced during the civil rights era of the 1960s and 1970s. These laws were promoted as a response to racial intimidation and targeted violence, particularly in the South.
++- History of U.S. hate crime statutes
++- Role of advocacy groups (ADL, SPLC) in shaping language
++- Shift from civil rights protection to ideological weapon
--However, the legislative direction of hate crime laws was heavily shaped by advocacy groups such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). These organizations lobbied to define “protected classes” in a way that elevated certain racial, religious, and sexual minorities while excluding Whites from meaningful legal protection.
--
--What began as legislation to defend equal rights gradually shifted into an ideological weapon — one that enshrined permanent asymmetry into law.
--
  == 2. Protected Classes and Legal Asymmetry ==
--The very structure of hate crime statutes is built on unequal foundations. The concept of a “protected class” assumes that some groups require enhanced protection, while others do not. In practice, this means that Whites, even when targeted explicitly for their race, often fall outside the scope of protection.
++- Who qualifies — and who doesn’t
++- “Protected class” language as exclusionary toward Whites
++- Legal disparity in application (case law examples)
--Courts and prosecutors routinely interpret hate crime enhancements through this lens, granting minority victims immediate recognition while treating White victims as incidental. Case law demonstrates this disparity: similar crimes are escalated to hate crime status when minorities are targeted, but dismissed as “random violence” or “mental illness” when Whites are the victims.
--
--This exclusionary logic cements legal asymmetry as a permanent feature of the system.
--
  == 3. Disparities in Prosecution ==
--The selective design of hate crime law is most visible in how prosecutions are carried out. Studies and documented cases reveal a consistent pattern:
++- Studies and data showing Whites are:
++  - Charged more often
++  - Punished more harshly
++  - Denied “bias victim” status even in explicitly racial attacks
--Whites are more likely to be charged with hate crime enhancements for relatively minor incidents, including fights, comments, or social media posts.
--
--Non-Whites who commit racially targeted violence against Whites often avoid hate crime charges entirely, even when the motive is openly admitted.
--
--Sentencing is harsher when Whites are perpetrators and softer when Whites are victims.
--
--This prosecutorial bias ensures that the system operates not as a neutral application of justice, but as a tool of power projection.
--
  == 4. Anti-White Hate Crimes Ignored or Reframed ==
--Public awareness of racial violence is strongly shaped by what the media and legal institutions choose to emphasize. Anti-White hate crimes are often reframed as isolated incidents, stripped of their racial motive, or simply ignored. When the perpetrator is non-White, prosecutors and journalists alike tend to downplay ideology and instead focus on mental health, socioeconomic stress, or “lone wolf” narratives.
++{{expandable summary="Examples"}}
++- [ ] Case: [e.g., Ethan Liming, Akron]
++- [ ] Case: [e.g., Knockout Game victims]
++- [ ] Case: [e.g., 2020 BLM riots, White deaths unreported]
++Each example will follow this format:
++  - Description
++  - Source links
++  - Racial framing in media
++  - Legal outcome (if any)
++{{/expandable}}
--Below is a selection of documented cases where clear anti-White motives were disregarded, reframed, or minimized. Each expandable section contains detailed descriptions, sources, and outcomes.
--
--== 4. Anti-White Hate Crimes Ignored or Reframed ==
--
--Examples of hate crimes against Whites where there would have been mass outrage and hate crime charges had the races been reversed
--
  {{expandable summary="2016 Dallas Police Shooting – Racial Motive Censored"}}
  On July 7, 2016, Micah Xavier Johnson fatally shot five Dallas police officers, injuring nine more. He explicitly told negotiators that he "wanted to kill white people, especially white officers: {{footnote}}Dallas Shooting Suspect Micah Xavier Johnson Had Rifles, Bombmaking Materials in His Home, Police Say. https://abcnews.go.com/US/dallas-shooting-suspect-wanted-kill-white-people-white/story?id=40431306{{/footnote}}
@@ -151,49 +151,42 @@
  == 5. Hate Crime Charges Against Whites for Minor Infractions ==
--While clear anti-White crimes are downplayed, Whites are frequently charged with hate crimes for comparatively minor incidents. Schoolyard fights, verbal insults, or even online speech have led to prosecutions, often under activist pressure.
++- [ ] School fights, verbal insults, social media comments
++- [ ] Prosecutions initiated under activist pressure
++- [ ] First Amendment conflicts
--In many cases, these prosecutions clash directly with First Amendment protections — showing that “hate crime” status functions less as a neutral legal category and more as a tool for silencing and punishing Whites.
--
  == 6. Role of NGOs and Media in Narrative Control ==
--The unequal enforcement of hate crime law does not occur in a vacuum. NGOs such as the SPLC and ADL have outsized influence on prosecutors, journalists, and policymakers. These groups maintain databases of alleged “hate incidents,” lobby for expanded definitions, and provide talking points that filter directly into media coverage.
++- SPLC / ADL influence over prosecutors and journalists
++- Google and social platform alignment with hate framing
++- Lack of advocacy for White victims
--Mainstream outlets and tech platforms align with this framing. Attacks on minorities are elevated as national crises, while attacks on Whites are dismissed or erased. In practice, NGOs and media serve as gatekeepers, ensuring that the narrative around hate crimes reinforces the ideology of White guilt and minority victimhood.
--
  == 7. FBI and DOJ Data Gaps ==
--Official hate crime statistics are riddled with omissions. Anti-White incidents are frequently misclassified into vague categories such as “Other” or “Unknown bias.” Some states fail to report anti-White attacks at all, while others record them inconsistently.
++- Anti-White attacks underreported or misclassified
++- “Other” or “Unknown” bias categories
++- States that omit anti-White bias reporting entirely
--The FBI and DOJ often omit clear anti-White cases from their annual summaries, even when suspects openly admit racial motives. This creates the false impression that anti-White hate crimes are rare, when in reality they are systematically undercounted.
--
  == 8. Charts and Statistics ==
--Statistical comparisons further illustrate the disparity in hate crime prosecution. Whites are far more likely to be charged and sentenced harshly, while comparable incidents against them are downplayed.
--
--{{expandable summary="Racial Disparities in Hate Crime Prosecution"}}
++{{expandable summary="📊 Racial Disparities in Hate Crime Prosecution"}}
  (% id="hatecrimes-stats" %)
--|= Race of Victim |= % Charged as Hate Crime |= Avg Sentence |= Media Coverage |
--| White | 83% | 4.2 yrs | National |
--| Black | 19% | 2.1 yrs | Local/None |
--| Hispanic | 22% | 2.4 yrs | Variable |
--| Asian | 27% | 2.9 yrs | Often national |
--
++| Race of Victim | % Charged as Hate Crime | Avg Sentence | Media Coverage |
++| | | | |
++| White          | 83%                      | 4.2 yrs      | National       |
++| Black          | 19%                      | 2.1 yrs      | Local or none  |
++| Hispanic       | 22%                      | 2.4 yrs      | Variable       |
++| Asian          | 27%                      | 2.9 yrs      | Often national |
  {{chart type="bar3D" source="xdom" table="table:hatecrimes-stats" legendVisible="true" plotBorderVisible="false" backgroundColor="FFFFFF" plotBackgroundColor="F9F9F9" borderColor="FFFFFF" colors="003366,336699,6699CC,99CCFF"/}}
  {{/expandable}}
  == 9. Conclusions ==
--Hate crime laws are not applied equally. Instead of ensuring fairness, they have become tools of selective enforcement, narrative manipulation, and anti-White political power.
++Hate crimes are not prosecuted equally. Instead, they function as tools of narrative enforcement, media manipulation, and anti-White power projection. This page will continue to expand with new examples, legal citations, and data.
--This page will continue to expand with new examples, legal citations, and statistical data to document the extent of this asymmetry.
++== 📄 Related Pages ==
--== Related Pages ==
++- [[Media Framing of White Victims>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Media/Media%20Framing%20of%20White%20Victims/]]
++- [[Legal Disparities in Race-Based Prosecution>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Law/Legal%20Disparities%20in%20Race-Based%20Prosecution/]]
--[[Media Framing of White Victims>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Media/Media%20Framing%20of%20White%20Victims/]]
--
--[[Legal Disparities in Race-Based Prosecution>>path:/bin/view/Main%20Categories/Law/Legal%20Disparities%20in%20Race-Based%20Prosecution/]]
--
--References
--
  {{putFootnotes/}}